RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
Better yet, create a DL with no members and add all the SMTP addresses. No muss, no fuss, no record, nothing. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Akerlund, Scott Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees The best method I have seen for this is to create a dummy mailbox. Assign it all the SMTP addresses for the former employees. Open this mailbox and set up an inbox rule wizard to permanently delete the messages as they come in. For all practical purposes they become vaporized. Not exactly RCW and such compliant, but it works. Scott -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 9:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Is there some brilliant way to delete all of the junk e-mail that ex-employees get? I.E. I have it (Exchange 2000) set to send me any e-mail message that does not resolve to one of our employees. When we kill their old e-mail box, they have inevitably set them selves to receive every piece of junk e-mail known to man so I get tons of them. I realize I could just create a rule in my e-mail box to kill it as it comes to me, but is there some kid of way to return an e-mail to the sender that acts like the domain is no longer available (I.E. it would act like it bounced and we no longer exist). For example, when our server went down during the conversion, all of the e-mails I get for this list service got bounced back and my account get set to on-hold. What ever it looks like when my e-mail gets bounced is what I would like to do for specific addresses. Does this make sense or am I barking up the wrong tree? Thanks, Arch Willingham _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees
Read, actually. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 3:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Hear? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Glaman, Mark Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 3:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees don't tell Scharff he makes sense.. We'll never here the end of it. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 1:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees Now those are some answers that make sense!G -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 4:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Kill new e-mail messages to previous employees -Original Message- 1. Believe it or not, some of the people that are on this list are not only Exch Admins but also server double duty by working in other functions in their company. In the case a vice president of a construction company...I.E. work on Exchange...build buildings, get screamed at by owner's, holler at subcontractors, estimate jobs, pay roll, accounts payable, job cost, maintain the other software on the network, etc, etc, etc. all in a crappy construction market where you can't hire a full time MIS person as money is too tight. Hmm.. I need a new house, wonder if we could work something out in trade. 2. Sometimes, your brain goes numb and something just does not ring a bell. Have you ever forgotten a person's name? I'm sorry, who are you again? 3. 100% of the things we all know in life were taught to us by someone else. I have learned a ton by reading this list when possible and, every once in a while, dipping my toe in the water and asking a question. I once dropped a brick on my foot, didn't really need someone else to tell me not to do that again. Damn brick. 4. Have you ever used some type of software for years and had someone walk up and do something that, while you thought you knew it backwards and forwards, you had no idea it would do? Someone told me the other day that people actually use Excel can be used to tally up numbers. Who knew? We have always had problems with young carpenters not asking enough questions because some old superintendent that knew everything bit their head off for asking what they thought was a stupid question...sound familiar? Um... let's not use any of those young carpenters on my new house ok? Or, at least give them an Exchange manual to read before they start... I'll bring the coffee and doughnuts to the job site. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Default folders in Exchange
I thought you could just use the old mail client to fix these kinds of things. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 6:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Default folders in Exchange While this isn't supposed to happen, I have witnessed something similar myself. I had a user who had her inbox renamed to the subject of an email. I would probably exmerge all the data out to PST, blow away the mailbox, recreate it, and then exmerge everything back in and massage the data to the correct folders. -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 3:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Default folders in Exchange User Group Exchange 2000 SP2 Outlook 2000 SR1 I have a user who has their drafts folder below the deleted items folder and their inbox below the drafts folder. Can any one tell me how I can get these folders back at the root level of the users mailbox. This is not the first time that this has happened and am wondering what would cause this problem. I can't see this as a user error. Deleted Items\Drafts\Inbox Actions: 1. Look on TechNet 2. Use Exchange 5.0 Client to try and move the folders back 3. Run Outlook.exe with /ResetFolders 4. Moving the users mailbox in the past did not cure the problem I know as a last resort I can export the users mailbox out into a pst and recreate the mailbox. Constructive comments would be very much appreciated. Regards Marc Mearns Mobile - 07775-630508 Office - 020 7695 0286 ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Haiku Friday
USA lost to Poland. USA beat Portugal. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Woodruff, Michael Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 7:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Haiku Friday USA lost to Portugal Portugal Sucks USA still advancing though:-) -Original Message- From: Ali Wilkes (IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 10:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Haiku Friday The Wings won last night Stanley is home in Detroit Now I can get sleep. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] personalmail _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Default folders in Exchange
I seem to remember that I did something similar. I thought all I did was click on the folder and drop it on the top level folder, which IIRC is Mailbox - name -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Marc Mearns Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Default folders in Exchange Thanks for all the responses. 1. I did not use the move user function intially as this had not fixed my problem on previous occassions. On this occasion it did. 2. /ResetFolderNames Resets the language of the default folders to the language of the Outlook client.( This does not look as if this would fix my problem ( Also don't have XP). I did try resetfolders. 3. I did not know that you can move the folders with Exchange Client. I have only been able to rename folders? 4. With OWA I was not able to do this I got access denied when trying to move a system folder. Thanks again. Regards Marc Mearns -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 June 2002 15:43 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Default folders in Exchange This is just one way to fix it. Another one is running Outlook 2002 with the /resetfoldernames switch (as per Q296192). http://www.slipstick.com has a list of other possible ways to accomplish that without killing the whole mailbox. Unfortunately I was unable to find it a direct link the moment. Cheers:Siegfried runat=server / -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 4:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Default folders in Exchange You can, I have done so myself using the Exchange 4.0 client. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 9:00 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Default folders in Exchange I thought you could just use the old mail client to fix these kinds of things. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 6:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Default folders in Exchange While this isn't supposed to happen, I have witnessed something similar myself. I had a user who had her inbox renamed to the subject of an email. I would probably exmerge all the data out to PST, blow away the mailbox, recreate it, and then exmerge everything back in and massage the data to the correct folders. -Original Message- From: Marc Mearns [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 3:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Default folders in Exchange User Group Exchange 2000 SP2 Outlook 2000 SR1 I have a user who has their drafts folder below the deleted items folder and their inbox below the drafts folder. Can any one tell me how I can get these folders back at the root level of the users mailbox. This is not the first time that this has happened and am wondering what would cause this problem. I can't see this as a user error. Deleted Items\Drafts\Inbox Actions: 1. Look on TechNet 2. Use Exchange 5.0 Client to try and move the folders back 3. Run Outlook.exe with /ResetFolders 4. Moving the users mailbox in the past did not cure the problem I know as a last resort I can export the users mailbox out into a pst and recreate the mailbox. Constructive comments would be very much appreciated. Regards Marc Mearns Mobile - 07775-630508 Office - 020 7695 0286 ** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). The format of address is: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This footnote also confirms that this email message has been swept by MAILsweeper for the presence of computer viruses. J Sainsbury plc (185647 England) Sainsbury's Supermarkets Limited (3261722 England) Registered Offices: 33 Holborn London EC1N 2HT ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL
RE: Wal-Mart
Doesn't Kevin already have that job? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Baker, Jennifer Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 9:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wal-Mart That and my own personal feather fan boy. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 4:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wal-Mart Doesn't decent pay in Arkansas equate to being enough to afford the Learjet to commute home to a real state every night? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wal-Mart They were hiring for that same job 2 1/2 years ago. The pay was decent...but it's still in Arkansas. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 7:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Wal-Mart I have a opportunity to work there. Just curious if anyone else worked there and what they thought about the working environment. They are switching from 5.5 to 2000. - Original Message - From: Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:43 AM Subject: RE: Wal-Mart Hmm, yes. Anyone, please spill all the details about their infrastructure. Juuust curious. :-) -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 June 2002 09:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Wal-Mart Anyone here working or has worked for Wal-Mart in Bentonville on their email system? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wal-Mart
Indoor plumbing? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Wal-Mart Jeez where as this thread gone? Had the interview yesterday went well. They are hiring for 3 Exchange positions. When I asked him what is Bentonville is like, all he said was it has all the modern amenities. - Original Message - From: Baker, Jennifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:01 PM Subject: RE: Wal-Mart That and my own personal feather fan boy. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 4:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wal-Mart Doesn't decent pay in Arkansas equate to being enough to afford the Learjet to commute home to a real state every night? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wal-Mart They were hiring for that same job 2 1/2 years ago. The pay was decent...but it's still in Arkansas. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 7:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Wal-Mart I have a opportunity to work there. Just curious if anyone else worked there and what they thought about the working environment. They are switching from 5.5 to 2000. - Original Message - From: Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:43 AM Subject: RE: Wal-Mart Hmm, yes. Anyone, please spill all the details about their infrastructure. Juuust curious. :-) -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 June 2002 09:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Wal-Mart Anyone here working or has worked for Wal-Mart in Bentonville on their email system? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Wal-Mart
Currently 97 here. Not too many IT jobs though. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jim Helfer Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wal-Mart An-y-where! As long as it's HOT ! -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wal-Mart What's that mean? Indoor plumbing and double glaized windows?[1] -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA [1] Beer at MEC from me for the first person to get the reference. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Wal-Mart Jeez where as this thread gone? Had the interview yesterday went well. They are hiring for 3 Exchange positions. When I asked him what is Bentonville is like, all he said was it has all the modern amenities. - Original Message - From: Baker, Jennifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:01 PM Subject: RE: Wal-Mart That and my own personal feather fan boy. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 4:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wal-Mart Doesn't decent pay in Arkansas equate to being enough to afford the Learjet to commute home to a real state every night? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Baker, Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Wal-Mart They were hiring for that same job 2 1/2 years ago. The pay was decent...but it's still in Arkansas. -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 7:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Wal-Mart I have a opportunity to work there. Just curious if anyone else worked there and what they thought about the working environment. They are switching from 5.5 to 2000. - Original Message - From: Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 9:43 AM Subject: RE: Wal-Mart Hmm, yes. Anyone, please spill all the details about their infrastructure. Juuust curious. :-) -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 June 2002 09:59 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT: Wal-Mart Anyone here working or has worked for Wal-Mart in Bentonville on their email system? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5
As a couple of ultimately frustrated people have pointed out, if you have the time and the tape, and it works for you, what's the big deal? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 8:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 It takes a long time, and it takes a lot of tape space. And you know what? I don't think I have ever heard of anyone ever needing to use one, especially with deleted item retention. So, why waste time, tape, bandwidth (assuming you are backing up over a network) and CPU cycles? ~ -K.Borndale IT Manager Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |-+--- | | kanee | | | [EMAIL PROTECTED]| | | Sent by:| | | bounce-exchange-148870@l| | | s.swynk.com | | | | | | | | | 06/12/2002 10:20 PM | | | Please respond to | | | Exchange Discussions | | | | |-+--- --- | | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 | --- | So its wrong because other people said it is. You make your own conclusions thru experience and i have not found any issues so far with running brick level backups. So andy give me some more logical reasons as to why brick level backup is not good rather than just because other admins said so -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 8:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 WRONG! Issue Number Four: If Brick Level Backups are so absolutely necessary, why is it that so many Exchange Admins on this list recommend you do not use them? -Original Message- From: kanee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 7:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 This has been a known issue with veritas products. The mapi32.dll file is very sensitive and reports errors on messages as cannot open and thus will show the status of backup as failed. There isnt really much you can do about this, except ask the user to delete the message its referencing in the error message from his mailbox and empty it from deleted items. I have spent some time with veritas and they point fingers at microsoft and i spoke to microsoft and they point the fingers back to veritas, veritas knows of this issue and they say they are looking at a solution and should be out in the next build for backup exec8.6, i know you use netbackup so maybe you should look into their next build for netbackup. Even though this error pops up and the overall status of the backup job shows up as failed, the backup in actuality is successful, you can restore the users mailbox and the only thing missing would be those messages that it reported as corrupted or cannot open. So dont loose any sleep over this you are fine. dONT LISTEN TO PEOPLE TELLING YOU NOT TO DO BRICK LEVEL BACKUPS, ITS ABSOLUTELY NECCESSARY TO DO BRICK LEVEL BACKUPS, IT WILL SAVE YOU SO MUCH HEADACHE AND HEART ACHE LATER..TRUST ME. -Original Message- From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 Thanks for the info. Well then, might i suggest, as Andy and no doubt other admins would recommend, that you should stop doing BLB's. Here are a few links for you to ponder over. http://mail.tekscan.com/nomailboxes.htm http://www.exchangefaq.org/recovery/0004.php3 Regards Mr Louis Joyce Data Support Analyst -Original Message- From: Kulwinder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 June 2002 15:21 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Veritas Netbackup error on MSX 5.5 we get the error when doing a BLB only. when doing normal full backups of the store - everything is fine - the mailbox account that we use has the exchange service account set as the nt account, sop has the permissions set. Im sorry, im getting confused now. Do you get the error when doing a brick level back-up? Or when you just back up the store on its own? Are you saying you only carry out BLB's when you get this type of
RE: OWA
Say it with diamonds. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 2:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA I love you, Jennifer. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Baker, Jennifer Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA He's a suck-up. We all know who really wrote it. -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Hey!!! I'm the author of the how to move Exchange servers to a different domain [1]. Sheesh . . Ed gets all the credit around here mutter -Original Message- From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 5:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Hi Ed, Thanks very much for the tip. I tried using his SMTP address and can now access his inbox via OWA. The strange thing is, there doesn't seem to be an alias even remotely like this guys one. I'll go through my mailboxes and check though because there must be a similar alias, as you suggested. By the way, thanks a lot for all your highly informative info on the swinc site. I've learned heaps about changing first servers, Exchange service accounts and moving Exchange servers between domains. This stuff just isn't covered in any Exchange 5.5 book I've read and without your articles I would have been lost. Regards Tony See if the user can get to the mailbox with his SMTP address instead of the alias. That would suggest that this user's alias is a substring of another alias. For example, his alias is joe and you have a joel already. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony McCarthy Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Hi Everyone, I have a problem with a mailbox that, for some reason cannot be found with OWA. The user gets the following error message OWA was unable to get to your inbox. There is nothing overtly unusual about this particular user's setup. I have tried pointing his mailbox to both servers in the site in his mailboxes Advanced Properties. I've also tried leaving this field blank with no success. Apart from the OWA problem his mailbox works fine. I've just about reached a point where I'm going to delete his mailbox and recreate it. No one else in the site has this problem. Does anyone know what could be causing this? Regards Tony Tony McCarthy Systems Engineer OSI Software Auckland New Zealand Ph: 64 09 522 5909 (Auckland) Fax: 64 09 522 5901 (Auckland) Mob: 021 703035 (NZ) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
RE: OWA
Mark Green died. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 2:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA We only get supporting roles. Ed is still the star. He is kind of like the Dr Mark Green of Swynk. Except not as nice. -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 10:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Hey!!! I'm the author of the how to move Exchange servers to a different domain [1]. Sheesh . . Ed gets all the credit around here mutter -Original Message- From: Tony McCarthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 5:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Hi Ed, Thanks very much for the tip. I tried using his SMTP address and can now access his inbox via OWA. The strange thing is, there doesn't seem to be an alias even remotely like this guys one. I'll go through my mailboxes and check though because there must be a similar alias, as you suggested. By the way, thanks a lot for all your highly informative info on the swinc site. I've learned heaps about changing first servers, Exchange service accounts and moving Exchange servers between domains. This stuff just isn't covered in any Exchange 5.5 book I've read and without your articles I would have been lost. Regards Tony See if the user can get to the mailbox with his SMTP address instead of the alias. That would suggest that this user's alias is a substring of another alias. For example, his alias is joe and you have a joel already. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony McCarthy Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Hi Everyone, I have a problem with a mailbox that, for some reason cannot be found with OWA. The user gets the following error message OWA was unable to get to your inbox. There is nothing overtly unusual about this particular user's setup. I have tried pointing his mailbox to both servers in the site in his mailboxes Advanced Properties. I've also tried leaving this field blank with no success. Apart from the OWA problem his mailbox works fine. I've just about reached a point where I'm going to delete his mailbox and recreate it. No one else in the site has this problem. Does anyone know what could be causing this? Regards Tony Tony McCarthy Systems Engineer OSI Software Auckland New Zealand Ph: 64 09 522 5909 (Auckland) Fax: 64 09 522 5901 (Auckland) Mob: 021 703035 (NZ) _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: stupid disclaimers
Wickieup AZ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 12:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers I figure there's that town in the southwest that has the annual rattlesnake round up. Where they capture as many rattlesnakes and then kill them. Couldn't we have something like that for lawyers? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mellott, Bill Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 11:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers now youre trying to get on my good side ;-) bill -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers Wouldn't the easiest solution to all of this be killing all lawyers? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 11:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers Also, I could simply claim that I am not bound by contracts which I did not sign. Copyrights (note the spelling) are enforceable by law. You could, I imagine, copyright an e-mail, but you I don't think that I have ever seen a disclaimer that has the line: C2002 Ed Crowley or the like, which is all that is technically required to apply a copyright to a publication (as I understand it but I am not an attorney). So the issue is not copyright. By receiving an item by e-mail I do not submit to being bound to any contractural agreement, just like I am not bound by any contractural agreement associated with every single piece of postal junk mail I receive. As far as I am aware, no law says that I am. So, in your judgment (you aren't a lawyer either, are you?) should I reply to every piece of e-mail that has a disclaimer with a message of my own notifying said correspondent that I am not bound by the legalese of their disclaimer? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Carerros Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 10:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers I wasn't clear..sorry palm pilot has taken up two days because I cant get it to sync..and I'm way beyond being frustrated bye it.. But to clarify. Adding a disclaimer to an e-mail is like adding a citation to item under copywrite. You show, very plainly, that you understand the sensitivity of the information and because you have to manually enter the e-mail address you show that you are aware of who you send it to. To add to that you can go into contract law and pull out court cases that argue wither online click Ok to agree type of contracts are not legal. You only need to argue that if digital contracts are not always legal, how can you claim that a disclaimer that is placed on the end of an e-mail (and you can argue that as a standard practice that you stop reading the e-mail if you get to one) can some how hold a legal suit against you. They can't, because disclaimer are not law (where being ignorant of law does not protect you from punishment) you cannot legal enter a contract (such as is implied with a disclaimer) without some proof of knowledge of it. So, if you add the disclaimer to your e-mail, you are stating, Yea, I _know_ that this is sensitive stuff but if I send it out no one can use it in anyway or I can sue them. I'm not sure, but I bet a good lawyer could use that type of angle to destroy all legal ramifications that would favor a disclaimer. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 9:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers I don't understand how this relates to disclaimers one way or another. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant hp Services Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Charles Carerros Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 5:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: stupid disclaimers If you get a lawyer out of the office and talking like a human being, (I did this once) you get really interesting information. Like one told me once that if you create a website with all borrowed copywrited materials you should NEVER site the source of the materials in thinking that if you site the source all obligations go away. What you are really doing is giving the lawyer half of what he needs to prosecute you. (Fair use and copyright is based on knowledge of use and then the extent that the use effects the market, in a nutshell that's it). So if you steal something or want to make a lawyer work you DON'T put a disclaimer on it, that way
RE: Exporting from Outlook 98
You setup the DR server, restore the priv and use exmerge. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Kuhl Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exporting from Outlook 98 Is exporting to a .pst unreliable? We were having trouble with Outlook on one pc and a consultant did an export and not all the email came back. We are still using Arcserve 2000 for backup and I turned off the bricks level because of reading it was bad news. So how then do I recover a single mailbox. Microsoft is so wonderful, NOT _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging)
Why are giving her such a hard time? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Doug Hampshire Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging) I just heard back from one of my contacts at the insert guv'ment agency that does not exist and they said you were a Troll. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging) I just heard back from one of my contacts at Microsoft. He said that he can't comment on it. But he did say that there are some wild theories out there. Some are crazy and some are more sane --Felicity Sadly enough, true. Conclusion: unless it is a released product there is nothing you can really rely on, even a press announcement. Sig / -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging) =20 At ATE 2 years ago, we spent a lot of time answering questions about the amazing E2K WebDav features in Outlook 2002 based on the presentations given there eh Sig? I don't exactly trust things I read on http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/default.asp as gospel either. =20 -Original Message- From: Siegfried Weber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging) From the http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/20879.html: quote The pending announcement is vitally important for Microsoft, because the rumors suggest that Kodiak, the next major release of Exchange Server, will use Yukon as its store rather than the current JET/EDB/ESE storage engine. If that is the case, then Yukon will need to handle the extraordinary storage flexibility that Exchange Server offers today. /quote Read it closely. It doesn't say the next version of Exchange. It talks a about a future MAJOR release code named Kodiak. Also note that both articles is from 07/08/2001, about a year old! I wouldn't count on anything which isn't officially from Microsoft and current. And of course, these are all rumors unless it is officially confirmed in public by Microsoft. So, unless I read it on http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/default.asp I do not believe it is true. Can we now get back to our daily work and stop feeding the rumor mill? Siegfried / -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging) I apologize for leading anyone astray, but Siegfried I was absolutely stunned to hear you say it wasn't so. I have been following this for a long time and I though it was a done deal. Please give me your comments on the following links. http://www.dnjonline.com/TechEd2001/reports/sess_keynote_jon.htm l http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/20879.html I am checking with a few of my SQL contacts who work for Microsoft to hear what they can officially say about this. I know a few who work on part of the teams who are involved in the SQL.NET File System which you may or may not know if very similar to WSS, and is optimized for handling the sort of non-rectangular record sets that Exchange has. --Felicity Neither will ESE98 being ported to SQL Server nor does the next version of Exchange have an SQL Server based database engine. As I mentioned already. Please check that information with the source you got it from and stop posting plain wrong information here which might confuse other people. Siegfried / -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:21 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Messaging collaboration (Unified Messaging) = =3D20 I know that, I was making a dumb joke about the fact that SQL Server will be providing the next database engine for the next version of Exchange. And the code name for the next version of SQL Server is Yukon. =3D20 Can you confirm that ESE98 is being ported to SQL Server? =3D20 TIA =3D20 --Felicity The next version of Exchange is not codenamed Yukon. William *Titanium* Racing Bikes Why ride when you can fly? - William Lefkovics www.airborne.net
RE: Where is everyone?
Hi John. I'm in Phoenix too. Too hot, too dry. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Where is everyone? Phoenix, 98° F . . . .getting hot. Data Center: 68° F I'll stay inside today. - Original Message - From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:31 AM Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Richland, WA...SE Corner of Washington State. 3.5 hours SE of Seattle. Temperature 73° F (supposed to get to 85) Windchill 76° F (means it's a hot wind) Humidity 41% Wind Southwest at 13 mph Conditions Fair Visibility 10.0 miles -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
Sons of Hercules on Channel 9 (WOR?)! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 3:06 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Hi, I'm Andy and I like gladiator movies and margaritas. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Hi John. I'm in Phoenix too. Too hot, too dry. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Q Jr. Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Where is everyone? Phoenix, 98° F . . . .getting hot. Data Center: 68° F I'll stay inside today. - Original Message - From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 9:31 AM Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Richland, WA...SE Corner of Washington State. 3.5 hours SE of Seattle. Temperature 73° F (supposed to get to 85) Windchill 76° F (means it's a hot wind) Humidity 41% Wind Southwest at 13 mph Conditions Fair Visibility 10.0 miles -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
Phoenix, AZ. Send rain. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? I'm in Las Vegas, NV. Where are you? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
We were all at the Tony Awards. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? NYC - everyone is coming on line at once, you must all be getting back from something. --Felicity Mmm... World Cup. Sleepless nights... Lot of people think Argentina will get this one. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Off celebrating the World Cup? Naw, we wouldn't give you the silent treatment. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
Only the secret cabal knows, which of course doesn't exist. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? You're home? Are you there to stay? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? I'm in Las Vegas, NV. Where are you? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Where is everyone?
Yup. Way too dry. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Sanborn, John Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? We've just brought our new volunteer fire dept[1] into operation this past weekend. Looks like it's going to busy summer ... [1] outside of Maricopa - south of Phoenix. -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Where is everyone? Got plenty of that here - Original Message - From: Ray Zorz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:43 PM Subject: RE: Where is everyone? Phoenix, AZ. Send rain. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Where is everyone? I'm in Las Vegas, NV. Where are you? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Where is everyone? Where is everyone? Is there some party going for Exchange admins that I wasn't invited to? Or is everyone hung over from the weekend? Or am I getting the silent treatment yet again? Sigh! -Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cable Modems
If you didn't kill each other first. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Don and I working in the same office would be downright scary. All the other techs would be crying and shaking. -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Dear Martin and Don, If you are that good, I could get both of you jobs on the Network and Communications Team here at Wawa. The VPN Project at Wawa was (and is) not easy. Think about it, you could drink all of the Wawa brand drinks for free, all work day long, and have access to all the Scrapple you could eat Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 02:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Putting the rack mount brackets on -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems It takes you that long??? Or are you including removing it from the box? :P -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems I think it depends on the VPN. A Cisco VPN device can be configured in about 5 minutes. -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Dear Dot, I apologize. I have misled you. VPN is not easy. VPN is not easy, but it can accomplish what you are looking to do. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 01:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Thanks for the responses, it looks as though the VPN route is going to be the easiest to implement for us. Dot -Original Message- From: John Matteson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems VPN. Secure, authenticated. Just like at the office. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cable Modems With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email via these services. Our mail server is not publicly accessible. Does any one have a good way of handling these requests? Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To
RE: Cable Modems
Torchering? Is that English Flashlight tag? I dunno, given 2 my way or die attitudes, I wouldn't want to be there. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ely, Don Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems We'd not kill each other. Torchering others... Now that's fun! -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 5:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems If you didn't kill each other first. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:46 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Don and I working in the same office would be downright scary. All the other techs would be crying and shaking. -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 1:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Dear Martin and Don, If you are that good, I could get both of you jobs on the Network and Communications Team here at Wawa. The VPN Project at Wawa was (and is) not easy. Think about it, you could drink all of the Wawa brand drinks for free, all work day long, and have access to all the Scrapple you could eat Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 02:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Putting the rack mount brackets on -Original Message- From: Ely, Don [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems It takes you that long??? Or are you including removing it from the box? :P -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems I think it depends on the VPN. A Cisco VPN device can be configured in about 5 minutes. -Original Message- From: Garrish, Robert B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 11:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Dear Dot, I apologize. I have misled you. VPN is not easy. VPN is not easy, but it can accomplish what you are looking to do. Rob Garrish Exchange Administrator Wawa Inc. 610-558-8371 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 01:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems Thanks for the responses, it looks as though the VPN route is going to be the easiest to implement for us. Dot -Original Message- From: John Matteson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 12:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cable Modems VPN. Secure, authenticated. Just like at the office. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Defeat is a state of mind. No one is ever defeated until defeat has been accepted as a reality. To me, defeat in anything is merely temporary, and its punishment is but an urge for me to greater effort to achieve my goal. Defeat simply tells me that something is wrong in my doing; it is a path leading to success and truth. --Bruce Lee -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, June 03, 2002 8:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cable Modems With the current wave of cable modems and DSL links offered by Ameritech, ATT and, of late, DirecTV our users are asking for access to their email via these services. Our mail server is not publicly accessible. Does any one have a good way of handling these requests? Personally, I don't want to enable access to my mail servers via Ameritech.net or whatever. Your thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Dot Harris William Blair Company [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange
RE: IE access to Outlook calendar
We've all done one-handed typing.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 7:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: IE access to Outlook calendar You should use the Outlook View Control. I will paste the code in my next email and you can run it. I fear that if I post it in this message the antivirus detectors for everyone who subscribes to this list will howl. This is so sexy when I first discovered it I almost... well, I'd better not get into that here, it would just encourage you perverts, or the perverts amongst you. --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
LOL! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Felicity Smith Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Pardon me for asking, but who is Ed Crowley and why should I worship at his feet? --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Test
Like Fluke? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 11:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Especially a hot looking vendor who you are not going to buy from. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 11:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Food always tastes better when someone else pays for it. Ed Crowley hp Services --- Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Check the FAQ. Read section 2.6, Appendix A, and Appendix B. BTW, Ed hates feet worship. However I don't ever recall him turning down an offer of a free lunch. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 11:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Test Pardon me for asking, but who is Ed Crowley and why should I worship at his feet? --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Drive m:????
Keep looking. Their ad is next to the Equalizers. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Clark, John A (FUSA) Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:37 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: Does anyone know how to hire the A-Team? I can't find their ad in my local papers. -Original Message- From: HANNA, Keith (TSL Shirley) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 10:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: Happy Birthday to Mr. T. today. :) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 May 2002 15:27 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: There is no A-Team -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: Right. There is no M: drive. -Original Message- From: Felicity Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 7:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: pardon me for sounding so partonizing, but the M drive is the installable file system that ships with exchange. As you know all internet protocols (http, smtp, nntp, pop, imap) are now server by the same engine that does IIS. IIS consults the Exhcange store and a file handle to the item you are looking for in the Exchange store is returned. This is a true NTFS file handle and is provided by the EPoxy or EXIPC mechanism which masquarades exchange items as NTFS file handles using an asynchornous work queue which is extremely fast and provides little context switching. Think of it as another file system driver just the same as FAT, NTFS, CDFS, HPFS. The reason some of you do and some of you don't see an M drive is because IIS launches (specifically the W3svc service) before your exchange store service completes it start up process. Hence no M drive. All you do is bounce your w3svc service and you will have an M Drive. I chose to change HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\W3SVC and make DependOnService have the value of MSExchangeIS. You can change the drive letter by editing the following registry key. HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\EXIFS\Parameters On the Edit menu, click Add Value, and then add the following registry value: Value Name: DriveLetter Data Type: REG_SZ Value: P NOTE: If the DriveLetter value already exists, double-click the value, and then change the drive to n: or another letter. One more point about the EXIFS (Exchange Installable File System) - there are three methods of application deployment - xcopy from the file system, ftp, or email or sending data to an exchange public folder. NT admins like xcopy, web admins like ftp or webdave, exchange admins like to deploy to public folders. EXIFS provides a mechisim to keep everyone happy. --Felicity _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: Drive m:????
Sure there is. He has evidence. I have evidence. We've all seen it. It was just an unfortunate implementation on MS part. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: There is no M: drive... --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Muqeem Syed Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: WELL SUPRPRISE SURPRISE GUYS. I have M: and there are some reports that I can forward you .. I mean my anti-virus software tries to scan the M: and gets an error thrown... my backup software.. which also uses the disaster recovery otpion tries to do the same... and it gets an access denied.. and when I log in with the enetrprise admin as well. and try to check it.. shows me all the folders of the informtaion store.. but nothing beyond that.. says that I can see the permissions.. but cant change anything on that... I think we should check the microsoft site for more info.. and evidently the norton anti-virus site recommends that a filter be set on the anti-virus software to avoid scanning the M: -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 9:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: There is no M: drive. Ignore the M: drive. Forget you ever even heard the possibility of the existence of such a thing. -Original Message- From: Arch Willingham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 1:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Drive m: Okwhat's this Drive M: everyone talks about? I just installed Exchange 2000 last night and I don't see diddly squat about a drive m:. Note, that the server (and all of our workstations) already map to a drive we call m:. Is that the conflict? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Drive m:????
Ghostbusters? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jeremy Pinquist Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: There is only Zuul. (2 gold stars for whomever gets the reference) JP -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Drive m: There is no M: drive... --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT Upgrade question
The only reason you have to upgrade is the fact that NT4 E5.5 are closer to becoming non-supported. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Omilian Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT Upgrade question We're a smaller company( 40 users) and we currently run NT 4.0 and Exchange 5.5. Both run great and have been very stable (knock on wood). My question is how do you approach upper management asking to upgrade to Windows and Exchange 2000 when they have the if it ain't broke, don't fix it mentality? I've already tried the additional functionality route, but they're not buying it. Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT Upgrade question
The last thing you want to hear, when or if you need it, is Dude, you are so not supported. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chuck Bryant Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT Upgrade question If its not broke you don't need support so who cares if support is available? Eventually the increased functionality may be of value to the higher ups, after one of them hears about some great thing from a buddy on the golf course, etc. Address it then. Meanwhile, show them how much money you've saved them by not upgrading and ask for a portion of those savings as a bonus. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT Upgrade question The only reason you have to upgrade is the fact that NT4 E5.5 are closer to becoming non-supported. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Omilian Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2002 12:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OT Upgrade question We're a smaller company( 40 users) and we currently run NT 4.0 and Exchange 5.5. Both run great and have been very stable (knock on wood). My question is how do you approach upper management asking to upgrade to Windows and Exchange 2000 when they have the if it ain't broke, don't fix it mentality? I've already tried the additional functionality route, but they're not buying it. Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] == Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this electronic document is considered a confidential and/or privileged communication between John Burnham Insurance Services and the addressee(s). If the recipient(s) of this email communication is not the addressee(s), such recipient(s) is strictly prohibited from photocopying, distributing or otherwise using this email or its contents and/or attachment(s) in any way. If you received this message in error, please contact the sender listed above by any contact means listed. Thank you! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
New people. Old pissed off people. Etc. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Why do we go through this every three to six months? William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Certs are not a sign of competency. They just mean that the person is capable of memorizing braindumps. I interviewed MCSEs that answered the question Explain your NT domain structure in your previous job with an answer like We had ATM coming to the back of our PCs. You've got to be careful with MCSEs that come with huge resumes. There are some ways you can tell if they're good or not though. For example if the candidate writes MCSE with a larger font than his own name, you probably have a clueless wall-licker in your hands. If a person doesn't have certification, it means that he/she has not sat through the tests. That person can be the most knowledgeable guy out there. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question That guy is a knucklehead. The Best Cert is the one you need or help you do your job better. That is the best cert. I have a CCNP and CCDP and I really do not work in that industry. I really am an admin working with M$, Cisco, Citrix, Unix etc I studied the Cisco stuff because we were converting from x.25 to frame relay and I wanted to do it so I asked the company to give me a shot. I used the knowledge again when we switched to NVPN. My only point is that the Certs were about what I needed to improve my skill set. I had to hire a guy recently (echoing Lori and Ray) and I hired the guy that had very little Practical experience but he did have an MCSE. I thought that at least showed that he wanted to learn. I interviewed a few others that had more experience and never took the time to educate themselves in their chosen craft. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Don't invite that speaker again. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cerification question There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Ximian Exchange 2000
Flamed? I hope you continue to report on how it's going. Lotsa interest in non-Windows clients. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of tom Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Ximian Exchange 2000 Hoping I don't get flamed for this, but here goes. I've got a shop with numerous Linux users, but we also use exchange. I'm tired of the IMAP mess and want to enable them to participate in the calendaring, etc. that exchange provides. My question is, has anyone tried the GNOME (Ximian) Evolution software with exchange 2000 connector? If so, what are some of the bugs/pitfalls that you've experienced? I don't want to waste a lot of time if it's not ready for prime time yet. Cheers, Tom _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
While I agree, it's hard to put that on your resume. I'd rather hire people like me that don't immediately assume there's only one way to set up a network, and screw up the network even more because they don't why know things were done the way they were done. But again, while you can put that in the cover letter, you don't even know if they read it. I agree with the certs not being a measure of ability, just like you've probably met doctors, lawyers, certified ASE mechanics, etc, that aren't too good. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stephen Mynhier Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 5:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question I deal with (new and different) people daily who have worked with Exchange for years but don't know their database from their check file. I wouldn't let them within 20 feet of any Exchange server that I worked on but they are the hired Exchange expert for their company. The fact is that people are people, and certified people are not inherently better than experienced people or vice versa. I think that the best bet is the person who realizes that, regardless of how much he knows, he does not know everything and is always willing and wanting to learn more than he currently knows. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:43 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Cerification question Subject: RE: Cerification question Very good points. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question You people talk like you can't have both. Sure there are some paper MCSEs out there but there are also many MCSEs that have mucho experience. Most hiring managers, all things being equal will look at experience first but... then certs. Additionally while experience is the best there are people that have worked in one environment for so long that they know NOTHING about any other capabilities of the hardware/software. They are nearly as bad as the paper MSCE because the scope of their knowledge is so very limited and because of their experience think the only way to run a network is the way they did it at their last job. At least the Paper boyz know they are limited, are willing to learn, cost half as much and don't cause half the drama the experience guy does. They piss me off so much more, that and they usually have no idea as to WHY their last network was set up that way but that it is just the best way. Experience is NOT always the best qualifier either _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
Wraith w/ Charlie Sheen? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Glaman, Mark Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Ok how aboutThe Raith very cool movie -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question mallrats (classic) a really messed up movie that made me go what the hell did i watch was (Lost Highway) -Original Message- From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Ok so I was wrong and BlockBuster does carry it.. Silly me, when will I realize that Cooperate America rules all that is molecular... http://www.blockbuster.com/bb/movie/details/0,7286,VID-V+++237115,00.html? ~John -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question So where does one find this film? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question I just caught it last week, and was blown away. After watching it, I immediately played it again with the director's commentary. Who knew Bubble Boy could act? -Original Message- From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question I know that this is wyyy OT, but if you haven't watched 'Donnie Darko' yet, then go out and rent it..!! Trust me it is amazing, and not (sic) like some of my favz. It is an indy flick so BlockBuster most likely doesn't carry it... www.donniedarko.com Seriously this film is a dark comedy and is the best flick I have seen in awhile. A refreshing change from Patriotic inspired Police society big explosion trash.. -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Dang right, you're disfunctional with Clockwork Organge being one of your favorites. I didn't care for a bit; although Malcom McDowell (sic?) was good in it. Now, if you're looking for a favorite off-the-wall movie,I'd vote for Being John Malcovich. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question 2001 A Space Odyssey Clockwork Orange Full Metal Jacket Does that mean that I should only work for a dysfunctional company...? -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cerification question Well, I just realized that my three current favorites really aren't chick flicks, so maybe I misspoke. But there's no Monty Python, so... 1. Dogma 2. Apollo 13 3. 12 Angry Men They may up my estrogen allotment when they find out about this, though... - Original Message - From: Randal, Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:15 AM Subject: RE: Cerification question Go on, tell us, and we can put it to the test :-) Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 May 2002 16:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cerification question That is so not fair. I doubt that my three favorite movies would endear me to a group of men, who tend to be a bit more, shall we say, neandrathal, in their choices. M _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: Cerification question
http://www.fast-rewind.com/index.html - Seems to be either in a UK or AU format. I did a google search for Wraith DVD and got a few hits. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Glaman, Mark Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question ok so spelling is not my strong point.. Yep that's the one.. I've been trying to find it on DVD -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Wraith w/ Charlie Sheen? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Glaman, Mark Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Ok how aboutThe Raith very cool movie -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question mallrats (classic) a really messed up movie that made me go what the hell did i watch was (Lost Highway) -Original Message- From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 3:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Ok so I was wrong and BlockBuster does carry it.. Silly me, when will I realize that Cooperate America rules all that is molecular... http://www.blockbuster.com/bb/movie/details/0,7286,VID-V+++237115,00.html? ~John -Original Message- From: Orr, Dale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question So where does one find this film? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question I just caught it last week, and was blown away. After watching it, I immediately played it again with the director's commentary. Who knew Bubble Boy could act? -Original Message- From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question I know that this is wyyy OT, but if you haven't watched 'Donnie Darko' yet, then go out and rent it..!! Trust me it is amazing, and not (sic) like some of my favz. It is an indy flick so BlockBuster most likely doesn't carry it... www.donniedarko.com Seriously this film is a dark comedy and is the best flick I have seen in awhile. A refreshing change from Patriotic inspired Police society big explosion trash.. -Original Message- From: Chinnery Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:03 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Dang right, you're disfunctional with Clockwork Organge being one of your favorites. I didn't care for a bit; although Malcom McDowell (sic?) was good in it. Now, if you're looking for a favorite off-the-wall movie,I'd vote for Being John Malcovich. Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: King, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 1:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question 2001 A Space Odyssey Clockwork Orange Full Metal Jacket Does that mean that I should only work for a dysfunctional company...? -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cerification question Well, I just realized that my three current favorites really aren't chick flicks, so maybe I misspoke. But there's no Monty Python, so... 1. Dogma 2. Apollo 13 3. 12 Angry Men They may up my estrogen allotment when they find out about this, though... - Original Message - From: Randal, Phil [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 11:15 AM Subject: RE: Cerification question Go on, tell us, and we can put it to the test :-) Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 May 2002 16:05 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cerification question That is so not fair. I doubt that my three favorite movies would endear me to a group of men, who tend to be a bit more, shall we say, neandrathal, in their choices. M _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http
RE: Cerification question
Depends on what you want to be when you grow up. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cerification question There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
You, and others on this list, have for whatever reason been able to get past this certification ceiling because someone liked your personality, took a chance on you, and you were able to successfully run with it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question I have yet to pick up an exchange or Cisco Book. Infact I was given my first exchange book just yesterday by a friend. Have not had the time to read them. Yet I have worked with installs as large 30,000 users in exchange, As a hired consultant. Yesterday I added a few new T1's to a few of the 100's of routers the company I work for, as a day job, owns. I am solely responsible for all of those routers as well the rest of the network and a 5,000 user install of Exchange. Books and paper mean very little... Would you hire a paper MCSE over me? Would you hire someone who could Quote the OSI model over me? Why memorize what I have one the wall and in Text files. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question They had very little experience, and I asked them what the last book they read and neither could name a book- would you hire them? But you are right, I could use some education, no denying that. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question So to you the lack of a MCSE means they werent interested in educating themselves? Sheesh. Sounds like you need some education yourself. -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question That guy is a knucklehead. The Best Cert is the one you need or help you do your job better. That is the best cert. I have a CCNP and CCDP and I really do not work in that industry. I really am an admin working with M$, Cisco, Citrix, Unix etc I studied the Cisco stuff because we were converting from x.25 to frame relay and I wanted to do it so I asked the company to give me a shot. I used the knowledge again when we switched to NVPN. My only point is that the Certs were about what I needed to improve my skill set. I had to hire a guy recently (echoing Lori and Ray) and I hired the guy that had very little Practical experience but he did have an MCSE. I thought that at least showed that he wanted to learn. I interviewed a few others that had more experience and never took the time to educate themselves in their chosen craft. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Don't invite that speaker again. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cerification question There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly
RE: Cerification question
Very good points. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question You people talk like you can't have both. Sure there are some paper MCSEs out there but there are also many MCSEs that have mucho experience. Most hiring managers, all things being equal will look at experience first but... then certs. Additionally while experience is the best there are people that have worked in one environment for so long that they know NOTHING about any other capabilities of the hardware/software. They are nearly as bad as the paper MSCE because the scope of their knowledge is so very limited and because of their experience think the only way to run a network is the way they did it at their last job. At least the Paper boyz know they are limited, are willing to learn, cost half as much and don't cause half the drama the experience guy does. They piss me off so much more, that and they usually have no idea as to WHY their last network was set up that way but that it is just the best way. Experience is NOT always the best qualifier either _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
I saw your haircut, so the answer would be no. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question It is all about having good hair?? --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ray Zorz Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question You, and others on this list, have for whatever reason been able to get past this certification ceiling because someone liked your personality, took a chance on you, and you were able to successfully run with it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question I have yet to pick up an exchange or Cisco Book. Infact I was given my first exchange book just yesterday by a friend. Have not had the time to read them. Yet I have worked with installs as large 30,000 users in exchange, As a hired consultant. Yesterday I added a few new T1's to a few of the 100's of routers the company I work for, as a day job, owns. I am solely responsible for all of those routers as well the rest of the network and a 5,000 user install of Exchange. Books and paper mean very little... Would you hire a paper MCSE over me? Would you hire someone who could Quote the OSI model over me? Why memorize what I have one the wall and in Text files. --Kevinm KMAP-SR, M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond http://www.daughtry.ca/ For Graphics and WebDesign, GO here! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Gordon Olson Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question They had very little experience, and I asked them what the last book they read and neither could name a book- would you hire them? But you are right, I could use some education, no denying that. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question So to you the lack of a MCSE means they werent interested in educating themselves? Sheesh. Sounds like you need some education yourself. -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question That guy is a knucklehead. The Best Cert is the one you need or help you do your job better. That is the best cert. I have a CCNP and CCDP and I really do not work in that industry. I really am an admin working with M$, Cisco, Citrix, Unix etc I studied the Cisco stuff because we were converting from x.25 to frame relay and I wanted to do it so I asked the company to give me a shot. I used the knowledge again when we switched to NVPN. My only point is that the Certs were about what I needed to improve my skill set. I had to hire a guy recently (echoing Lori and Ray) and I hired the guy that had very little Practical experience but he did have an MCSE. I thought that at least showed that he wanted to learn. I interviewed a few others that had more experience and never took the time to educate themselves in their chosen craft. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Don't invite that speaker again. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cerification question There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http
RE: Cerification question
I know a couple others already. It could be a technical witches coven. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Florea Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Cool. You should create a course and offer a cert in it...I'd sign up! -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:02 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question No shit. Most of these companies don't know that many of us don't have certs, but are most definitely the best person for the job. It is their loss. never took the time to educate themselves in their chosen craft. Bullshit. I am fully versed in witchcraft. -Original Message- From: missy koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 3:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Cerification question Shiminy. I was with ya until you hired the MCSE instead of me. - Original Message - From: Gordon Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:29 PM Subject: RE: Cerification question That guy is a knucklehead. The Best Cert is the one you need or help you do your job better. That is the best cert. I have a CCNP and CCDP and I really do not work in that industry. I really am an admin working with M$, Cisco, Citrix, Unix etc I studied the Cisco stuff because we were converting from x.25 to frame relay and I wanted to do it so I asked the company to give me a shot. I used the knowledge again when we switched to NVPN. My only point is that the Certs were about what I needed to improve my skill set. I had to hire a guy recently (echoing Lori and Ray) and I hired the guy that had very little Practical experience but he did have an MCSE. I thought that at least showed that he wanted to learn. I interviewed a few others that had more experience and never took the time to educate themselves in their chosen craft. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Don't invite that speaker again. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cerification question There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
The answer is: Kelly Borndale -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question I'll take teasers for $200 Alex. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 5:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Even with studying and knowing the material on the cert exams doesn't guarantee that one will be able to apply said knowledge to reall life system administration problems. I would rather give someone a brain teaser and see how their brain works, rather than see a cert. ~ -K.Borndale IT Manager Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:cc: bounce-exchange-148870@lSubject: RE: Cerification question s.swynk.com 05/01/02 04:55 PM Please respond to Exchange Discussions Certs are not a sign of competency. They just mean that the person is capable of memorizing braindumps. I interviewed MCSEs that answered the question Explain your NT domain structure in your previous job with an answer like We had ATM coming to the back of our PCs. You've got to be careful with MCSEs that come with huge resumes. There are some ways you can tell if they're good or not though. For example if the candidate writes MCSE with a larger font than his own name, you probably have a clueless wall-licker in your hands. If a person doesn't have certification, it means that he/she has not sat through the tests. That person can be the most knowledgeable guy out there. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Gordon Olson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question That guy is a knucklehead. The Best Cert is the one you need or help you do your job better. That is the best cert. I have a CCNP and CCDP and I really do not work in that industry. I really am an admin working with M$, Cisco, Citrix, Unix etc I studied the Cisco stuff because we were converting from x.25 to frame relay and I wanted to do it so I asked the company to give me a shot. I used the knowledge again when we switched to NVPN. My only point is that the Certs were about what I needed to improve my skill set. I had to hire a guy recently (echoing Lori and Ray) and I hired the guy that had very little Practical experience but he did have an MCSE. I thought that at least showed that he wanted to learn. I interviewed a few others that had more experience and never took the time to educate themselves in their chosen craft. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 12:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Cerification question Don't invite that speaker again. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cerification question There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: List or one of its members has some BAS
Perhaps someone changed his internal chip. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 7:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: List or one of its members has some BAS Wow Bruce, I didn't know you used slang words like ain't. This is like hearing Data use a contraction when he speaks! ;) -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: List or one of its members has some BAS Importance: High It ain't just you .. Martin - Original Message - From: Erik Sojka [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 4:14 PM Subject: OT: List or one of its members has some BAS My two recent postings to this list triggered two resubs to the Exchange list, and a sub to a fscking food ezine? I can't imagine how annoying this is for a regular list contributor... Can a list moderator please fix this Don Ely Broken-Ass sh!t? /Don Ely Exhibit 1: Re: your subscribe request subscribe Sorry, but the email address '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' is already a member of 'exchange'. Because you are already subscribed, internet.com did not subscribe you again. To unsubscribe, send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% Exhibit 2: Re: your subscribe request subscribe Sorry, but the email address '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' is already a member of 'myfooddirectory'. Because you are already subscribed, SparkLIST.com did not subscribe you again. To unsubscribe, send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exhibit 3: Re: your subscribe request subscribe Sorry, but the email address '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' is already a member of 'exchange'. Because you are already subscribed, internet.com did not subscribe you again. To unsubscribe, send a blank email to %%email.unsub%% Exhibit 4: Thank you for registering for the MyFoodDirectory.com newsletter. You should receive your first newsletter within the week. We welcome your comments and suggestions about the newsletter and the site. You may contact us any time at: http://www.myfooddirectory.com/contact.cfm _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server
MG came close though. Their cars wouldn't start. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stephen Mynhier Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2002 2:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server And no car manufacturer has made a car yet that will not crash -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, April 25, 2002 1:19 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Well, Microsoft has not designed a fix yet that will cure all the problems. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 12:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: scheduling automatic rebooting of server Rebooting servers periodically is not a solution; it is just burying your head in the sand and pretending everything is fine. If that is acceptable/expected quality of service in your environment, then I guess it's ok. Serdar Soysal _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Virus Question
I got a couple too. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 8:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Virus Question This morning I received the following e-mail: -Original Message- From: ANTIGEN_PELLIG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 7:55 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Antigen Notification:Antigen found VIRUS= VHP-361 (CA(InoculateIT)) virus Antigen for Exchange found Body of Message infected with VIRUS= VHP-361 (CA(InoculateIT)) virus. The file is currently Cleaned. The message, RE: SMTP message size limits, was sent from Christopher Hummert and was discovered in PINK, Nathaniel\Inbox located at FPM Netops/FPMMAIL/PELLIG. -End of Original Message- Now I've checked around and I've failed to find any information about this virus, furthermore even with our most recent updates to Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition it didn't find anything either. Does anyone thing this is something I should worry about or does anyone know what this virus is? -Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: NT 4.0 Clients and Exchange 2000
Perhaps WINS was the reason for questioning. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Winzenz Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 9:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: NT 4.0 Clients and Exchange 2000 Hope you're not trying to imply that an NT 4.0 client can't be part of a native mode domain . . . Pardon me if I misread your comment. James Winzenz, MCSE, A+ Associate Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems, Inc. -Original Message- From: Jerzy Setmajer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: NT 4.0 Clients and Exchange 2000 Recommend reading description of what NATIVE MODE means From: John Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2002/04/17 Wed PM 04:26:42 EDT To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: NT 4.0 Clients and Exchange 2000 I have NO IDEA why...my NT workstation clients cannot connect to Exchange 2000. I have name resolution for both WINS and DNS and even got so desperate as to put entries in the LMHOSTS and HOSTS files! Win2k Machines connect no problem. I am in native mode. Any help would be greatly appreciated Thanks John _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: SMTP message size limits
I never had a limit nor had a problem. But we were sending lots of graphics files. As Martin said, it's a company-by-company decision. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: SMTP message size limits 15MB... I think that is an ideal size. But you need to base it on your companies needs. As an example at a multimedia company, 15MB may be way too small. But here, 15MB is just fine. -Original Message- From: Moore, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 10:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SMTP message size limits I am being hammered by management on restricting SMTP message limits to 15MB. What limit are you using? Thanks, Jim Moore Systems Engineer / DBA Saint Luke's Hospital Voice: 816.932.6990 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Full access
Is this the 6'4 built-like-a-NFL-linebacker Mr. Seielstad you're talking about? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Doug Hampshire Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:02 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access The talented and ever popular Mr. Seielstad is neither my boss, nor a C-Level exec. And he has graduated beyond SSM status. He can actually get dressed all by himself now each morning. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access ShavedSeielstad.exe? Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:38:20 -0700 From: Doug Hampshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Full access To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] But how am I supposed to monitor my boss's and all the C- level exec's mailboxes then. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 10:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Prevent the forwarding of an email message.
They were for us too. We even had a never-busy fax service which queued up incoming faxes in case of problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prevent the forwarding of an email message. Oh yea. You betcha. We use those new-fangled Facsimile Machines out here in the Midwest we do. Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:04:11 -0500 From: Hunter, Lori [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Prevent the forwarding of an email message. To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] You betcha!! -Original Message- From: Schwartz, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prevent the forwarding of an email message. Fax machines are still considered Mission Critical eh? -Original Message- From:Hunter, Lori [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prevent the forwarding of an email message. I am here to tell you that there is no e in Citi. Every frigging thing is on paper. They won't even use Remedy - they use a fax machine! -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prevent the forwarding of an email message. Since you work for a bank, Im betting that you guys still type out memos. Original message Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:16:30 -0400 From: Schwartz, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Prevent the forwarding of an email message. To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll use the same argument Doug used for the BCC question. How did you prevent someone from taking a typed memo and making photocopies of it? -Original Message- From: Bibel, Laura Y. [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prevent the forwarding of an email message. Ok, let me try this again. If I send a message marked private, when the recipient opens it, he CANNOT modify anything in the message box. He CAN hit reply or forward, but he CANNOT modify my message and he CANNOT copy any of my message while composing the reply. I was looking at this only from a reply/forward perspective. I just realized that when the recipient opens the original message, he CAN copy the contents elsewhere. I think that's wierd though. It would be nice if you couldn't copy in either read or compose mode. I apologize for my error (even though I was partly right, I think!!!) I feel stupid enough so be nice, ok? Laura Bibel Allegheny Energy: Information Services Voice (724) 830-5966 Fax (724) 853-3600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Prevent the forwarding of an email message. Okay if you say so. - Original Message - From: Bibel, Laura Y. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 9:23 PM Subject: RE: Prevent the forwarding of an email message. If the message composed in Outlook is marked private, the contents can't be copied/pasted. Laura Bibel Allegheny Energy: Information Services Voice (724) 830-5966 Fax (724) 853-3600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Kevin Beron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 3:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Prevent the forwarding of an email message. Was wondering if there was a way to prevent someone from forwarding the email message or any content of the message. (ie cutting and pasting to a new message. We are using exchange 5.5 server and outlook 97, 98 and 2000 clients. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kevin Beron. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Andy David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
RE: Full access
I exmerged out of my production box twice to fix corruption problems, both times per PSS. No big deal. -Original Message- From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access Sometimes? Sometimes when? I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years. - Original Message - From: Andrey Fyodorov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM Subject: RE: Full access Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day work. 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the smallest group of users possible. I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Why is this a bad design? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Full access Asked and answered at least once this week already I think. Q258183. I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that particular question implies. -Original Message- From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Full access What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to all PFs and Mailboxes in Exchange2k? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Restoring an old (no longer existing) server
I suppose you can create another server, and use Exmerge to search. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michel, David Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 12:27 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Restoring an old (no longer existing) server As I seem to recall you mentioning once that you USED to work for MS, is it really fair to expect the same rates as MS Consulting currently charges? By the way, I don't think my question was posed in such a way as to require a step-by-step answer. I know how to do the restore, I was looking to see if there was an easier way that I had not thought of and if anyone has been through a similar process. I kind of thought that's what these lists were supposed to be about??? -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 3:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Restoring an old (no longer existing) server I was about to give step-by-step info but realized that that does not put bread on the table. My services are available at $225/hr plus TE. - Original Message - From: Michel, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 1:57 PM Subject: Restoring an old (no longer existing) server Current setup: - Exchange 2000 sp2 on mailbox servers and a single 5.5 sp4 IMC server - Currently using NTBackup for backups and Antigen 6.5 for virus/content filtering I was just informed that, due to a lawsuit, I must restore an old 5.5 server that no longer exists and restore the entire database (not brick-level) for a period of about different 8 months. I have the databases on a month-end tape from each of those months and those tapes were made use ArcServe. I also have long since reused that server. Once the database is restored on the new server, I must then go through every email from every user and search for text in either the subject AND the body. After this is done for one month I'm to blow everything away and start all over again with the next month's tape. My question is how in the hell am I going to accomplish this? Building the server and recreating the Exchange environment is easy enough but I'm confused on the restore and the searching parts. If I have to buy something like Trend for the searching I guess it could be done and charged to the client but I prefer not to. As for the backups, since I cannot bring this server onto our network and the backup server that has ArcServe is obviously on the network, how do I do this? My best guess is to use a cross-connect cable and bring the backup server offline during the restore time. Any other suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks. David Michel Ruden McClosky Smith Schuster Russell, P.A. NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster, Russell, P.A. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware
8 to 5 in IT? What's wrong with 5pm to 8am to accomplish this? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rowell, John (AFIT) Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my organization and so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small window in the mornings between 7am and 8am, before users arrive. That does not give a lot of time to move users, and moving a mailbox of, say, 100 MB can take some time. Try moving 500 mailboxes with an average of 30 MB each and I think you'll find it takes longer than a backup and restore. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a Friday and Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on a LAN and actual impact to any single user would likely be only a matter of minutes. -Original Message- From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware Over 500. Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here? -Original Message- From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very effective, I would not discount the backup and restore method, where you do the whole move within one day. I've used the Ed Crawley Server Move method and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take months to move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if they are big. As a result, recently I used the server move method, and had great success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner. I wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to back out of it. There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup restore, ii) using off-line backup restore, and I found the latter easier. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 25 March 2002 18:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware I suggest rebuilding your plan from the ground up. Read the FAQ (Link is below) - there is a well developed set of steps to doing it the right way. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Sebastian, Didy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 25, 2002 4:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware I have to move my existing Exchange 5.5 to new hardware. I am restoring from an online backup and will basically install everything from CD - NT4, Service Pack 6, Exchange 5.5, Exchange Service Pack 3 and then use my Legato backup to restore the Information Store and Directory Store. Can anybody offer any advice or pointers on what to watch out for? Thanks in advance for you help. Regards, Didy _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of
RE: Dead Letter Mailbox
Or use the black hole method - create a DL with nobody on the list, and put the smtp addresses of the departed in the address list. They just disappear. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Matteson Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 1:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Dead Letter Mailbox You can create a Public folder to hold all the NDR's and set a low retention time, like 2 days. Then they get automagically flushed every time maintenance runs. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 Be not afraid of growing slowly, be afraid only of standing still. --Chinese Proverb -Original Message- From: Ward, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 2:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Dead Letter Mailbox Appropriate NDR's forward to Admin Mailbox -Original Message- From: Hawkins, Stuart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Dead Letter Mailbox Hi there Does anyone know of a solution for handling incoming messages that are going to NDR because the recipient doesn't exist? I would like the NDRs to happen normally, but also the mail to be forwarded to a 'Dead Letter Office' for manual processing. Thanks Stuart Hawkins Network Systems Manager Bovis Homes Limited Cheltenham, UK Tel: 01242 662635 Fax: 01242 662667 www.bovishomes.co.uk The information in this e-mail and any files transmitted with it is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee and others authorised to receive it. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or action taken in reliance on its contents is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any files attached to this email have been checked with virus detection software before transmission. However, you should carry out your own virus check before opening any attachment. Bovis Homes Limited accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by software viruses. If you have received this e-mail in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Delay Outgoing Mail
You set it up once, and it stays that way. This PHB happens to have technical skills. He could do it himself in a minute. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 7:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail Yes. But I'm sure the PHB CEO doesn't want to have to do this himself. This would probably be one of those times We have looked into possible options, and the answer is no on the server side. On the client side you could do this (show him Rays and Williams methods), or we could bring in a programming consultant to make OL ask yes or no. What is the budget for this project? -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail Can't you delay the sending via Outlook? Give him a minute, or 5. Tools-Options-Mail Delivery? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rasey, Dennis Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail Get ready to laugh (I sure did) Looks like our CEO sent out an e-mail that either he shouldn't have, or wasn't quite ready to send (hit the Send key by accident, has happened to me also). Regardless, now I have to look into delaying out-going e-mails so that we have a chance to intercept it if we encounter this again. RANT To be quite honest, even if this is possible, I'm not really thrilled about implementing it, and I may go as far as saying it's not possible ;) I think delaying the e-mails would cause other problems that I'm not willing to deal with, plus I'm sure it would be difficult to delay just out-bound stuff (versus internal mails), and there is no way folks would take kindly to me delaying our internal stuff (and it wouldn't matter who 'wanted' it to be done). /RANT At this point, I'm curious if this is do-able, but I'm not that worried about it Another funny thing is this is the most techno-savvy CEO I've dealt with in my career. He's also smart enough to know it was %100 his fault (you should have heard him rag on himself for doing this). Usually we'll get bitched at for not being able to stop it (i.e. we'll get crap because the e-mail system works too fast). I'll shut up now.. Thanks all, Dennis -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 5:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail Jinx. Pinch, Poke. You owe me a coke. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail To attain what goal? Just curious. -Original Message- From: Rasey, Dennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 5:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Delay Outgoing Mail I'm trying to find an option to allow us to delay outgoing e-mails. I'm using Exchange 5.5 (sp4), and I've been asked by one of my superiors to see about adding in a delay for e-mails going out to the Internet. We would like to delay those messages about 3-5 minutes. We also would like to NOT delay internal e-mails (if possible). Is this possible? If this is possible, any potential problems with this setup? Thanks, Dennis Rasey Systems Administrator PDS - Premier Dealer Services 9449 Balboa Ave. Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92123 858-810-1734 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ
RE: Delay Outgoing Mail
That would work for Milton Dogg, not everyone else. g -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Setmajer, Jerzy Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail Simply putting a checkmark in the always check spelling before sending could do the trick :=) (this assumes that the signature has something that is not in the spellchecker list) -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail You set it up once, and it stays that way. This PHB happens to have technical skills. He could do it himself in a minute. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 7:12 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail Yes. But I'm sure the PHB CEO doesn't want to have to do this himself. This would probably be one of those times We have looked into possible options, and the answer is no on the server side. On the client side you could do this (show him Rays and Williams methods), or we could bring in a programming consultant to make OL ask yes or no. What is the budget for this project? -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail Can't you delay the sending via Outlook? Give him a minute, or 5. Tools-Options-Mail Delivery? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rasey, Dennis Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail Get ready to laugh (I sure did) Looks like our CEO sent out an e-mail that either he shouldn't have, or wasn't quite ready to send (hit the Send key by accident, has happened to me also). Regardless, now I have to look into delaying out-going e-mails so that we have a chance to intercept it if we encounter this again. RANT To be quite honest, even if this is possible, I'm not really thrilled about implementing it, and I may go as far as saying it's not possible ;) I think delaying the e-mails would cause other problems that I'm not willing to deal with, plus I'm sure it would be difficult to delay just out-bound stuff (versus internal mails), and there is no way folks would take kindly to me delaying our internal stuff (and it wouldn't matter who 'wanted' it to be done). /RANT At this point, I'm curious if this is do-able, but I'm not that worried about it Another funny thing is this is the most techno-savvy CEO I've dealt with in my career. He's also smart enough to know it was %100 his fault (you should have heard him rag on himself for doing this). Usually we'll get bitched at for not being able to stop it (i.e. we'll get crap because the e-mail system works too fast). I'll shut up now.. Thanks all, Dennis -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 5:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail Jinx. Pinch, Poke. You owe me a coke. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail To attain what goal? Just curious. -Original Message- From: Rasey, Dennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 5:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Delay Outgoing Mail I'm trying to find an option to allow us to delay outgoing e-mails. I'm using Exchange 5.5 (sp4), and I've been asked by one of my superiors to see about adding in a delay for e-mails going out to the Internet. We would like to delay those messages about 3-5 minutes. We also would like to NOT delay internal e-mails (if possible). Is this possible? If this is possible, any potential problems with this setup? Thanks, Dennis Rasey Systems Administrator PDS - Premier Dealer Services 9449 Balboa Ave. Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92123 858-810-1734 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please
RE: Delay Outgoing Mail
Really? Tools -Options-Mail Delivery isn't there? Maybe it's not there in exchange-mode? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rasey, Dennis Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 10:21 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail Ray, Where is this option? I don't have a 'Mail Delivery' tab in my Outlook2K. Dennis -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail Can't you delay the sending via Outlook? Give him a minute, or 5. Tools-Options-Mail Delivery? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rasey, Dennis Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail Get ready to laugh (I sure did) Looks like our CEO sent out an e-mail that either he shouldn't have, or wasn't quite ready to send (hit the Send key by accident, has happened to me also). Regardless, now I have to look into delaying out-going e-mails so that we have a chance to intercept it if we encounter this again. RANT To be quite honest, even if this is possible, I'm not really thrilled about implementing it, and I may go as far as saying it's not possible ;) I think delaying the e-mails would cause other problems that I'm not willing to deal with, plus I'm sure it would be difficult to delay just out-bound stuff (versus internal mails), and there is no way folks would take kindly to me delaying our internal stuff (and it wouldn't matter who 'wanted' it to be done). /RANT At this point, I'm curious if this is do-able, but I'm not that worried about it Another funny thing is this is the most techno-savvy CEO I've dealt with in my career. He's also smart enough to know it was %100 his fault (you should have heard him rag on himself for doing this). Usually we'll get bitched at for not being able to stop it (i.e. we'll get crap because the e-mail system works too fast). I'll shut up now.. Thanks all, Dennis -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 5:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail Jinx. Pinch, Poke. You owe me a coke. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail To attain what goal? Just curious. -Original Message- From: Rasey, Dennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 5:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Delay Outgoing Mail I'm trying to find an option to allow us to delay outgoing e-mails. I'm using Exchange 5.5 (sp4), and I've been asked by one of my superiors to see about adding in a delay for e-mails going out to the Internet. We would like to delay those messages about 3-5 minutes. We also would like to NOT delay internal e-mails (if possible). Is this possible? If this is possible, any potential problems with this setup? Thanks, Dennis Rasey Systems Administrator PDS - Premier Dealer Services 9449 Balboa Ave. Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92123 858-810-1734 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version
RE: Prep
Not just anybody. CJ. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 3:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prep Why do people keep saying that? It is *SO* the opposite. William -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 1:58 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prep I think he said if Exchange 5.5 was cruel, E2K was downright sadistic. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prep Ok...let's try that again...I'm POST-Mr. Jones. :o) Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prep Which was? (Sorry...I'm pre-Mr. Jones) Jim Blunt -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 1:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prep I suspect he is... Nonetheless, the more I work with E2k, the more I think Mr. Jones was correct in his initial assessment of it. -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 4:09 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Prep _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.343 / Virus Database: 190 - Release Date: 3/22/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.343 / Virus Database: 190 - Release Date: 3/22/2002 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Prep
It's just Andy being Andy. Like most of the truly helpful people on the list, they add a little levity when they can. You need to get over it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prep You know it would be one thing if he did this only once in awhile.but every single time I post a question to the list I always get shit from him..what's his problem? Does he get off on attacking people he'll never meet? -Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Prep My thoughts exactly, but I'll hold back on the plonk. It's always amusing to watch newbies flounder in the waves. - Original Message - From: Thomas Di Nardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 6:47 PM Subject: RE: Prep If there ever was a fast way to get on a kill list, you just found it. You haven't been here long, and with comments like that (particularly to Andy), you won't be staying long. Plunk. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prep Ha ha.why don't you just keep on topic asshole -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prep Well Sir, you obviously have the writing skills I need to take my show on the road. My agent will be contacting you. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prep Ha ha your funny..with your talent why are you in the comedy industry and not the comic circuit? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prep No, that would be fdisk. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prep So you can run it even after the exchange server has been installed? -Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prep You can run them anytime. If you have a large enterprise with remote DC's, it's best to leave some time. William -Original Message- From: Mike Woodruff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Prep Can I run Forest and Domain Prep on AD and not install exchange2k until later? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information
RE: Prep
Good point. That's why lurking is a good choice for awhile, and secondly, never get too upset. Next time you have the urge to say something in anger, type it up, use lot's of expletives deletives, and press Delete instead of Send. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prep So how the hell was I supposed to know that this guy didn't have something against me for just being a newbie? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ray Zorz Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:14 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prep It's just Andy being Andy. Like most of the truly helpful people on the list, they add a little levity when they can. You need to get over it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Christopher Hummert Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:59 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prep You know it would be one thing if he did this only once in awhile.but every single time I post a question to the list I always get shit from him..what's his problem? Does he get off on attacking people he'll never meet? -Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 4:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Prep My thoughts exactly, but I'll hold back on the plonk. It's always amusing to watch newbies flounder in the waves. - Original Message - From: Thomas Di Nardo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 6:47 PM Subject: RE: Prep If there ever was a fast way to get on a kill list, you just found it. You haven't been here long, and with comments like that (particularly to Andy), you won't be staying long. Plunk. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:13 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prep Ha ha.why don't you just keep on topic asshole -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 12:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prep Well Sir, you obviously have the writing skills I need to take my show on the road. My agent will be contacting you. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prep Ha ha your funny..with your talent why are you in the comedy industry and not the comic circuit? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prep No, that would be fdisk. -Original Message- From: Christopher Hummert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prep So you can run it even after the exchange server has been installed? -Chris -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Prep You can run them anytime. If you have a large enterprise with remote DC's, it's best to leave some time. William -Original Message- From: Mike Woodruff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 10:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Prep Can I run Forest and Domain Prep on AD and not install exchange2k until later? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you
RE: Delay Outgoing Mail
Can't you delay the sending via Outlook? Give him a minute, or 5. Tools-Options-Mail Delivery? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rasey, Dennis Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 7:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail Get ready to laugh (I sure did) Looks like our CEO sent out an e-mail that either he shouldn't have, or wasn't quite ready to send (hit the Send key by accident, has happened to me also). Regardless, now I have to look into delaying out-going e-mails so that we have a chance to intercept it if we encounter this again. RANT To be quite honest, even if this is possible, I'm not really thrilled about implementing it, and I may go as far as saying it's not possible ;) I think delaying the e-mails would cause other problems that I'm not willing to deal with, plus I'm sure it would be difficult to delay just out-bound stuff (versus internal mails), and there is no way folks would take kindly to me delaying our internal stuff (and it wouldn't matter who 'wanted' it to be done). /RANT At this point, I'm curious if this is do-able, but I'm not that worried about it Another funny thing is this is the most techno-savvy CEO I've dealt with in my career. He's also smart enough to know it was %100 his fault (you should have heard him rag on himself for doing this). Usually we'll get bitched at for not being able to stop it (i.e. we'll get crap because the e-mail system works too fast). I'll shut up now.. Thanks all, Dennis -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 5:37 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail Jinx. Pinch, Poke. You owe me a coke. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 8:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Delay Outgoing Mail To attain what goal? Just curious. -Original Message- From: Rasey, Dennis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 5:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Delay Outgoing Mail I'm trying to find an option to allow us to delay outgoing e-mails. I'm using Exchange 5.5 (sp4), and I've been asked by one of my superiors to see about adding in a delay for e-mails going out to the Internet. We would like to delay those messages about 3-5 minutes. We also would like to NOT delay internal e-mails (if possible). Is this possible? If this is possible, any potential problems with this setup? Thanks, Dennis Rasey Systems Administrator PDS - Premier Dealer Services 9449 Balboa Ave. Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92123 858-810-1734 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.343 / Virus Database: 190 - Release Date: 3/22/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.343 / Virus Database: 190 - Release Date: 3/22/2002 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Authentication issues
Perhaps Double-take on the www.sunbelt-software.com list. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bravo, Liliana Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 1:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Authentication issues Importance: High Hi Folks, We are looking for any software or idea for to create one image of my Exchange Server. We want to prevent if my exchange Server is unavailble or failed it can be recover with all my data completed. We want tohave the data update on line automatically on the image(like replication) without data loss. Do you know about any software that permit it us ? Thanks in Advance. Liliana _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.343 / Virus Database: 190 - Release Date: 3/22/2002 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.343 / Virus Database: 190 - Release Date: 3/22/2002 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Groups and such
Only if they're on the endangered species list. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Morgan, Joshua Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 1:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Groups and such How do you experienced Exchange Admins feel about nesting groups within Exchange 5.5? Joshua Morgan PROFITLAB Network Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] One is glad to be of service --Robin Williams (Bicentennial Man)-- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.338 / Virus Database: 189 - Release Date: 3/14/2002 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server?
You get to join the secret cabal. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jennifer Baker Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 12:24 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server? I know.. I KNOW!! http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq_appxj.htm What did I win? -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 8:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server? Any idea where I can find a comprehensive list of attachments I could block from entering my exchange server, assuming I have an application that will do such? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server? You are my hero. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 6:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server? It doesn't really make a good list server, but there are applications that will help. Such as: http://www.ikakura.com/ Others include: www.lyris.com www.lsoft.com William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Baer, Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server? Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server? I was told it is possible with some plug-ins. If so were can the plug-ins be found? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.338 / Virus Database: 189 - Release Date: 3/14/2002 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to delete a mailbox (manually)
/Kramer I'm out! /Kramer -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to delete a mailbox (manually) I rule nothing. But I am the master of my own domain. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 4:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: How to delete a mailbox (manually) Thou wouldst not even dare to commit such a treasonous act! I have in my possession an official Letter of Marque from the good and noble Prince Andy, joint ruler of this list and all that he can see from his computer chair. Now, shouldst thou wish to join young John in walking the plank, that can be arranged good sir. That sounds like a simple solution. So simple in fact that there is no way that it could work. You sir are out of line for even suggesting it. Now play nice, before I go after your other eye and mark my territory. Milton R Dogg Of The Dogg Foundation.. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 11:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: How to delete a mailbox (manually) Hmmm...well, here's a stupid thought. How about highlight it and hit the delete key? I have a mailbox that has no account associated with it. When I run clean up agent I does not mark the account for deletion, how can I delete it? - John Q _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.338 / Virus Database: 189 - Release Date: 3/14/2002 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Splitting up emails to multiple recipients
How about Mail Merge? That should send out 1 per recipient. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Parker Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 12:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Splitting up emails to multiple recipients Hello, I have some people who want to send out one-time mailings to a few hundred recipients. They don't want to go through the effort of setting up a listserv, however. One of our main recipient domains has a limit of 100 recipients max per email. So, when we send out these mass emails, they get stuck in our queue (they're rejected by the server receiving the emails), and it clogs up the works. I've been told by some other SMTP admins that ESMTP supports splitting up an email to multiple recipients into individual messages, with one recipient per message. I realize that mailing list software does this as well, but does Exchange 2000 support this feature? Any other thoughts about how to get around this issue? Thanks in advance _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.338 / Virus Database: 189 - Release Date: 3/14/2002 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Building an Exchange 5.5 server
You don't need no stinkin docs. If you push everything out to a local PST, won't your backups run faster? Look at all the time, disk space and tape you'll save. Isn't that IT's mission, to do more with less? Sheesh. Exchange rookies. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 10:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building an Exchange 5.5 server Do you have any documentation to back that up. I personally think you are wrong. How can Exchange work if you dont take it offline and run a defrag? PSTS are the default so they must be good. --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Verio can Burn in hell, While Qwest.net can bite my ARSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Akerlund, Scott Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building an Exchange 5.5 server Fair... Turn off circular logging, put the mail from the users pst's back in the information store as that is why it exists, turn on the deleted recovery dumpster for at least 10 days, and lastly I wish you the best with Arcserve for backups. Have a great weekend. I am going home now. :o) footnote: 1 PST=BAD 2 Arcserve = BAD get BackupExec for Veritas instead. as per the majority of users on this List. -Original Message- From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 8:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building an Exchange 5.5 server Yahoo groups goes down, and all of the offline comedy gets focused here. This is going to be a fun weekend. OK I have a new server that I just installed, I turned on circular loggined, run eseutil every Friday, then ghost the server to have a backup. I have 800 users all with PSTs, all of them are stored on the email server, how am I doing with my first exchange install. I just bought Arcserve and inoculateIT --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Verio can Burn in hell, While Qwest.net can bite my ARSE -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Edgington, Jeffrey Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 6:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building an Exchange 5.5 server If you fake it, Dell will break it, then you will yell. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 8:28 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building an Exchange 5.5 server If you want to fake it, buy a Dell. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 9:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building an Exchange 5.5 server If you break it, they will yell. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 6:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Building an Exchange 5.5 server If you build it, they will come. -Original Message- From: Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 8:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Building an Exchange 5.5 server Anyone know of any good sites (besides TechNet) for getting some info on building an Exchange server. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- - -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. === = == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- The
RE: Splitting up emails to multiple recipients
I dunno. I didn't mess with it too much. But you have to have the e-mail addresses somewhere. We used www.gammadyne.com mailer instead. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Parker Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Splitting up emails to multiple recipients Isn't mail merge only for word and excel documents? Can I mail merge into an email? Also, is there any way to do this on the server side, so that users don't have to remember to do the mail merge (and so that I don't have to show them how?) Thanks -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ray Zorz Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Splitting up emails to multiple recipients How about Mail Merge? That should send out 1 per recipient. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of David Parker Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 12:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Splitting up emails to multiple recipients Hello, I have some people who want to send out one-time mailings to a few hundred recipients. They don't want to go through the effort of setting up a listserv, however. One of our main recipient domains has a limit of 100 recipients max per email. So, when we send out these mass emails, they get stuck in our queue (they're rejected by the server receiving the emails), and it clogs up the works. I've been told by some other SMTP admins that ESMTP supports splitting up an email to multiple recipients into individual messages, with one recipient per message. I realize that mailing list software does this as well, but does Exchange 2000 support this feature? Any other thoughts about how to get around this issue? Thanks in advance _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.338 / Virus Database: 189 - Release Date: 3/14/2002 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.338 / Virus Database: 189 - Release Date: 3/14/2002 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: eseutil /d
I remember an excellent explanation of how this will actually hurt Exchange performance by one of the Ed's. I saved it, then lost it somehow. Maybe someone still has it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Couch, Nate Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: eseutil /d Try reading Jim McBee's book - Exchange 247. It talks about this very issue. Basically, it comes down to the view, from my reading, that if it ain't broke - leave it alone. If you aren't seeing any errors in the Event logs that clue you into a problem with the databases don't go begging for trouble - you are likely to find it. All the best in your battle with your coworkers. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: paragon400 Reply To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:32 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: eseutil /d I have some team members here that believe that regular defragmentation (offline) should be done as routine maintenance. I don't share this opinion, but I am having a hard time finding evidence to support my belief. Does anyone know of any links that support the theory that eseutil should not be used for regular maintenance or am I wrong and should it be part of regular maintenance? Exchange 5.5 environment. Thanks for any help anyone can provide. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.338 / Virus Database: 189 - Release Date: 3/14/2002 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server?
Just use *.* -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of William Lefkovics Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 9:00 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server? Any idea where I can find a comprehensive list of attachments I could block from entering my exchange server, assuming I have an application that will do such? -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 7:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server? You are my hero. -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 6:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server? It doesn't really make a good list server, but there are applications that will help. Such as: http://www.ikakura.com/ Others include: www.lyris.com www.lsoft.com William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+ -Original Message- From: Baer, Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 8:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server? Can exchange 5.5 be set up as a list server? I was told it is possible with some plug-ins. If so were can the plug-ins be found? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.336 / Virus Database: 188 - Release Date: 3/11/2002 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and Mac client
You shouldn't need a HOST file. I sure don't remember setting one up on the MAC when we bought a new one, and I sure didn't change anything when we changed IP addresses. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Drewski Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 3:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and Mac client no, but if you changed the IP address of your Exchange server, you'll have to change that record on the HOST file on the Mac, I bet... -- Drew Visit http://www.drewncapris.net! Go! Go there now! You don't promote the cause of peace by talking only to people with whom you agree. - Dwight David Eisenhower -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Julian Risnoveanu Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 3:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and Mac client I use pacbell,s DNS and I don't have any problem with any other pc clients. Do they have to ad an MX record for this client alone. -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 1:55 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and Mac client Could be A DNS problem. Maybe you need to add an MX record to your DNS -Original Message- From: Julian Risnoveanu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 4:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and Mac client I have exchange 5.5 and recently I had to reinstall the server. I have one Mac client and I can send e-mail inside my lan or receive mail from outside my lan but I can not send e-mail outside the lan. Can anybody help. Thank you. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: My Salary(exchange)
Does that mean yes? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Daniel Chenault Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 7:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: My Salary(exchange) Ah... now there's the rub, is it not? Are we to seek and achieve a certain milestone and, in so doing, look around and say, This is good and there cease our labors? Or are we to continue to endeavor to find happiness throughout a continuous journey? Mayhaps some combination serves best in that one may enjoy the best of both whilst not being burdened with either for not only is ceaseless work less of a joy so to is the ennui of the idle. - Original Message - From: Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 6:58 PM Subject: Re: My Salary(exchange) But more importantly, are you happy? - Original Message - From: Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 3:01 PM Subject: Re: My Salary(exchange) I'm not working. - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 1:47 PM Subject: Re: My Salary(exchange) Be happy your working - Original Message - From: Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 10:58 AM Subject: Re: My Salary(exchange) Based on his English usage and the way he phrased his question I'd wager that Mark is not in America. It's really difficult to make salary comparisons across borders. Hell, it's hard to do it within borders - the cost of living in San Francisco is demonstrably higher than, say, Tyler, Texas. It would be difficult to compare salaries between those two locations. - Original Message - From: Slinger, Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 2:44 AM Subject: RE: My Salary(exchange) However, Rocky is overpaid, regardless of what he earns, and doesn't work, so ignore that. 1) Your question seemed to be in reasonable English, but either your grammar/spelling or your typing needs some work. Go see how much that adds to your salary. 2) Try somewhere productive like http://www.salary.com 3) Think about it - number of servers is completely irrelevant. We'd need to know what kind of work you actually do with those servers, where you're located, what training/experience you have, what industry you're in, comparative rates for your location, localized inflation rates, etc. 4) All of which would be more suited for a Human Resources discussion list, not a FRIGGIN' EXCHANGE TECHNICAL LIST! G. -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 01:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: My Salary(exchange) If you're doing this by yourself you're a little underpaid and a little overworked. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Vidmarka Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 8:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: My Salary(exchange) Hi All, I was wondring what the average salary was for Admins. My salary is about $45,000 US Dollars In my position i have to look after the following 6 Exchange servers 4 sql Servers 2 mailsweepers 25 Various NT Servers 6 Unix boxes, running Solaris 2 and 7 2 of the boxes are used for Raptor (Load balanced) and the res is for banking system.There are also 200 NT 4 Clients. I dont just bay sit the SQL servers. Thanks in advance Mark __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ:
RE: My Salary(exchange)
I'm still working on figuring out what he said. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Smith Joseph Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 9:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: My Salary(exchange) I was just thinking the same thing... -Original Message- From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 8:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: My Salary(exchange) Ah... now there's the rub, is it not? Are we to seek and achieve a certain milestone and, in so doing, look around and say, This is good and there cease our labors? Or are we to continue to endeavor to find happiness throughout a continuous journey? Mayhaps some combination serves best in that one may enjoy the best of both whilst not being burdened with either for not only is ceaseless work less of a joy so to is the ennui of the idle. - Original Message - From: Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2002 6:58 PM Subject: Re: My Salary(exchange) But more importantly, are you happy? - Original Message - From: Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 3:01 PM Subject: Re: My Salary(exchange) I'm not working. - Original Message - From: Tony Hlabse [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 1:47 PM Subject: Re: My Salary(exchange) Be happy your working - Original Message - From: Daniel Chenault [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 10:58 AM Subject: Re: My Salary(exchange) Based on his English usage and the way he phrased his question I'd wager that Mark is not in America. It's really difficult to make salary comparisons across borders. Hell, it's hard to do it within borders - the cost of living in San Francisco is demonstrably higher than, say, Tyler, Texas. It would be difficult to compare salaries between those two locations. - Original Message - From: Slinger, Gary [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 2:44 AM Subject: RE: My Salary(exchange) However, Rocky is overpaid, regardless of what he earns, and doesn't work, so ignore that. 1) Your question seemed to be in reasonable English, but either your grammar/spelling or your typing needs some work. Go see how much that adds to your salary. 2) Try somewhere productive like http://www.salary.com 3) Think about it - number of servers is completely irrelevant. We'd need to know what kind of work you actually do with those servers, where you're located, what training/experience you have, what industry you're in, comparative rates for your location, localized inflation rates, etc. 4) All of which would be more suited for a Human Resources discussion list, not a FRIGGIN' EXCHANGE TECHNICAL LIST! G. -Original Message- From: Rocky Stefano [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2002 01:07 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: My Salary(exchange) If you're doing this by yourself you're a little underpaid and a little overworked. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Vidmarka Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 8:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: My Salary(exchange) Hi All, I was wondring what the average salary was for Admins. My salary is about $45,000 US Dollars In my position i have to look after the following 6 Exchange servers 4 sql Servers 2 mailsweepers 25 Various NT Servers 6 Unix boxes, running Solaris 2 and 7 2 of the boxes are used for Raptor (Load balanced) and the res is for banking system.There are also 200 NT 4 Clients. I dont just bay sit the SQL servers. Thanks in advance Mark __ Do You Yahoo!? Send FREE Valentine eCards with Yahoo! Greetings! http://greetings.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives:
RE: VBA In Outlook 2002 to replace Rules Wizard
go to www.slipstick.com for all things Outlook. Sue has a developers group. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dean Michael Dorman Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 2:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: VBA In Outlook 2002 to replace Rules Wizard Folks, I just want to replace my rules wizard with my own VBA code. Simply want to trigger an event when a message arrives and do filtering based mostly on the To: line. I want to move certain messages to certain folders, etc. Nothing too complicated but I can't seem to find any clear info that rings a bell for me. I am a VB programmer but definitely not used to the VBA (object) model in dealing with Outlook. Any help / advise would be appreciated .. Dean M. Dorman Systems Administrator Putnam Company / Acorn Markets http://www.acornmarkets.com PGP Key fingerprint: 6ABF BAF4 7784 1F54 18A6 C8A6 C788 4C14 22C2 5A75 .. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Utility to save attachments
Doesn't veritas offer something like that? Not sure if it's configurable down to the individual mailboxes though - I think it's all or nothing. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 7:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Utility to save attachments Well, good luck with that then! -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Utility to save attachments Preferably something that will not be client side dependent. Thanks -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:33 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Utility to save attachments Outlook? SlipStick! -Original Message- From: Ed Esgro [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Utility to save attachments Hi all, Does anyone know of an application that will remove all attachments for a particular mailbox and save them to a defined location? Preferably something that will not be client side dependent. It kind of has to be a service that runs in the back ground. TIA Ed _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- The information contained in this email message is privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message. Thank you. == _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon?
Exchange is where you go to change euros into dollars. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 3:15 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon? Neither did I and I got it. What's Exchange? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: QUINN, Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 06 February 2002 10:01 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon? I never went to MEC01 and I got it -Original Message- From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 05 February 2002 22:44 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon? I did; I just assumed it was marketing drivel from MEC01. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 5:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Anyone else get Spammed directly by this goon? Invitation to Subscribe You're invited to subscribe to Exchange Messaging News. This printed newsletter contains user case studies, product announcement, and debate on issues pertinent to the Microsoft Exchange Administrator. The forthcoming issue covers Disaster Recovery Planning Procedures, Content Management - Why is this an issue?, Capacity Management Archiving for Exchange as well as how one law firm manages intellectual property protection and monitoring within Exchange. I'd like to include you in the mailing for the next issue. It's free. It's from C2C Systems. You'll receive your copy in about two weeks. All you need to do is provide me with the correct information below: Your Name Company Name Address Line 1 Address Line 2 City State Country Postal Code Pick One: [ ] Please send me the free newsletter. [ ] Please delete me from your database because I've got absolutely no interest in anything related to Microsoft Exchange Server Administration. Received: from [EMAIL PROTECTED] by mr-new.bhi-erc.com with qmail-scanner-0.94 (. Clean. Processed in 0.071276 secs); 05/02/2002 12:35:25 Received: from c2c.adsl.spfdma.crocker.net (HELO c2c.com) (205.246.6.99) by mr.bhi-erc.com with SMTP; 5 Feb 2002 20:35:25 - From: Jonathan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Exchange Messaging News Sender: Jonathan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 17:19:18 -0500 Reply-To: Jonathan Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit == c2c.adsl.spfdma.crocker.net resolves to 205.246.6.99 Checking VISI.com Relay Stop List (RSL), Osirus Relays List (OSIRUS), Dorkslayers ORBS-clone (DORKS), Dorkslayers Zero Tolerance List (DORKZTL), Open Relay Database (ORDB), Arbitrary Blackhole List (ABL), DevNull (DEVNULL), Five Ten (FIVETEN), ORBZ Inputs (ORBZIN), ORBZ Outputs (ORBZOUT), SpamCop Blacklist (SPAMCOP), Intersil (INTERSIL), Extreme Blocking List (XBL), Compunet (COMPU), FloNetworks List (FLOWGO), Summit Blocking List (SBL), Spam Prevention Early Warning System (SPEWS), Blitzed Open Proxy Monitor (BOPM), Spamhaus Block List (SBL), 205.246.6.99 listed in FIVETEN(127.0.0.7) XBL(127.0.0.4) Five Ten (FIVETEN): added 2002-02-01; spam support - dns servers at 65.169.9.21 and 65.169.9.22 supporting Empire Towers bzah.com added 2002-01-05; spam support - dns server at 65.174.218.253 supporting http://www.poxteam2001.com added 2002-01-07; spam support - dns server at 65.174.218.253 supporting http://compower.numberop.com see also http://www.spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBX272 sprint finally removed that dns server on 2002-01-24, so this listing was scheduled to be removed on 2002-02-02 added 2002-01-26; spam support - dns server at 65.173.116.25 supporting http://compower.numberop.com sprint finally removed that dns server on 2002-01-28, so this listing was scheduled to be removed on 2002-02-02 Extreme Blocking List (XBL): hosting webqwest $1000 commission for $89 sale marketing-2000.net scelson webpower Registrant: Crocker Communication (CROCKER-DOM) PO Box 710 Greenfield, MA 01302 US Domain Name: CROCKER.NET Administrative Contact, Technical Contact, Billing Contact: Crocker, Matthew (MC331) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Crocker Communications PO BOX 710 Greenfield, MA 01302-0710 (413) 585-5164 (FAX) (413) 587-3352 Record last updated on 20-Sep-2001. Record expires on 30-Aug-2006. Record created on 29-Aug-1994. Database last updated on 5-Feb-2002 07:42:00 EST.
RE: Procomm and Exchange
to follow that star -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 7:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Procomm and Exchange What is your quest? -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Procomm and Exchange And how many restores did you do from that configuration? How often did you get a corrupt DB? Were you able to restore to a different machine? -- Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE Sr. Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA -Original Message- From: Morgan, Joshua [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Procomm and Exchange No not at all we even wrote custom scripts to do snapshots and get and instant picture of the Exchange DB Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 Fax: (413) 581-4936 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Dennis Depp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 4:05 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Procomm and Exchange Joshua, Did you have any problems with running Exchange on a NetApps box? Denny At 03:24 PM 2/5/2002 -0500, Morgan, Joshua wrote: I have run that type of environment but instead of Procom we had it on a NetApps box Joshua Morgan PH: (864) 250-1350 Ext 133 Fax: (413) 581-4936 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Procomm and Exchange We have that environment. Yes, MS said don't do it, but Procom said it's OK What else do you want to know? - Original Message - From: Camara, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 9:48 AM Subject: Procomm and Exchange I was wondering if anyone has put their exchange production environment on a Procomm NAS device. I know, I know, NAS is not supported but Procomm claims that MS supports them on exchange. I just want to find out if someone uses it for Exchange. Thanks! Jose David P. Camara II IT-NT Administration Credit Lyonnais *** Credit Lyonnais This e-mail contains confidential information or information belonging to Credit Lyonnais and is intended solely for the addressees. The unauthorized disclosure, use, dissemination or copying (either whole or partial) of this e-mail, or any information it contains, is prohibited. E-mails are susceptible to alteration and their integrity cannot be guaranteed. Credit Lyonnais shall not be liable for this e-mail if modified or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please delete it immediately from your system and notify the sender of the wrong delivery and the mail deletion. Credit Lyonnais in the Americas: Credit Lyonnais, S.A., Credit Lyonnais Bank New York Branch, Credit Lyonnais Securities (USA) Inc., Credit Lyonnais Securities Asia Ltd., Credit Lyonnais Rouse (USA) Ltd., and Credit Lyonnais Rouse Ltd. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The day after superbowl
I'll have to take your word for it. I've only barely watched a few aussie rules football games on TV. Keep in mind part the padding is just as much a weapon as it is for protection. My point about taking the hit is the Rugby Union guy might not get back up. The World Football league plays during the summer in several European cities, and seems to be getting more popular. Each team is mandated to have a few local players, so I assume there are local tryouts. I'm also guessing that rugby players would try, and that local reporters would get their impressions. AFAIK, none of them excel, even though our game is very simple, nice and slow, and has all that padding. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 3:43 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: The day after superbowl Ray, Well possibly that could be a good / bad thing (not knowing who Ray Lewis or Levon Kirkland are), but they would hit you a few times, then have to go and have a lie down. A Rugby Union player can keep it up all day, and with FAR less padding ;) I agree that some specialisation is a good idea, but come on. To quote your other post Best of the best. Kind of like hiring an Exchange admin as opposed to just a network admin. Well granted, but using your analogy, you would need 10 exchange admins, one to fire up the console, another to create a recipient, another to create a public folder, yet another to stop and start the store, and need I go on ? Since I dont follow the sport at all that may be an unfair comparison, but it seems to me that level of specialisation is just plain wrong. Having one guy who's sole job it is to kick the little ball through the posts seems rather pointless. *shrug* Glenn - Original Message - From: Ray Zorz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:45 PM Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Yeah well MINIMUM wage in the NFL is about $220,000/yr. And perhaps those tough guys ought to put the pads on and take a hit from Ray Lewis or Levon Kirkland. In the early days of the NFL, many players did play offense and defense. But as the game became more popular, it also became more sophisticated, and as such lead to specialization. The idea is it's the best of the best doing what they do best - run, catch, block, hit, throw. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 3:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: The day after superbowl I think the reason more Aussies dont try is that American football is right down near the bottom of the list of career choices. Soccer (Real Football), Aussie Rules, Rugby Union, Basketball, Rugby League, Baseball, and even Cricket (possibly even Curling) are above American Football. Aussie rules is a bit of a wierd game, sort of a cross between soccer (strategy) and rugby (voilence). Its those damn tight shorts I think. I dont want to spend my weekend looking at lots of men running around in tight shorts *shudder*. Basically the yanks are seen as wimpy for putting on all that padding before playing a game of footy. Rugby League (whilst I cant be called a fan), has about 1/4 the padding of AF, but the tackles are as equally violent. Also those breaks seem to interrupt the flow of the game IMHO damn, we ran 10 yards, better stop for a few minutes to compose ourselves. Oh, and whats the deal with that ghey dancing when they score a touchdown ? Are they surprised they managed to make it to the end of the field without a map ?? I can understand the carrying on with soccer, since goals are few and far between (typically). And why do they have an Defensive and Offensive team, cant the Americans manage to do both ? :) Glenn Australian by Choice - Original Message - From: Ray Zorz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 8:55 AM Subject: RE: The day after superbowl I dunno how that would be. While I appreciate Aussie rules football as a game, there seems to be more effort to not have the bone-jarring collisions american football encourages. But I am speaking from very limited experience. On the other hand, if the Aussies were so tough, I'd think more would try American football. I think there are a couple playing, notably a punter, and I think an offensive lineman. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: Supporting Outlook as an Exchange Admin - Poll
Depends on the size of the organization. I had about 50 users, so it wasn't that big a deal. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Supporting Outlook as an Exchange Admin - Poll What is the general consensus on supporting the client as an Exchange admin. To me it would seem helpful to know all the toys/options/features in exchange's clients to test, and to implement new options to the users... but what if users call about client issues? would that be a helpdesk function? I'm just curious if your jobs combine supporting the client side as well as the server side. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Automatically printing eMAILs
The title, Andy, not you. Stay seated awhile, think about Barbara Bush or something. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 12:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Automatically printing eMAILs It is now. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Automatically printing eMAILs I am the IT Mistress... is that inflation? ~ -K.Borndale IT Mistress Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:cc: bounce-exchange-148870@ls Subject: RE: Automatically printing eMAILs .swynk.com 02/05/02 02:13 PM Please respond to Exchange Discussions I hate title inflation. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I EXCHANGE GOD Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dupler, Craig Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 11:05 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Automatically printing eMAILs The thing that I always found amazing was that as secretaries became office administrators and clerks became accountants (in their minds), if you called them by their earlier titles they took offense. The thing that was given in lieu of money was treated as though its value was real. I would have thought that higher paid clerks and secretaries would have had more status than lower paid accountants (!) and secretaries, but apparently not. -Original Message- From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 10:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Automatically printing eMAILs Some of us arent as old as you and don't remember that. -Original Message- From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Automatically printing eMAILs Which is especially silly if you happen to know that most secretaries were male until sometime this century. -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 8:27 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Automatically printing eMAILs That, and the fact that there are a lot more males in the Personal Assistant field than there used to be and they took offense at being called a secretary...even though that's really what they are. -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 8:22 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Automatically printing eMAILs Well, the term secretary wasn't retired so much because it wasn't PC as that executives wanted to elevate the self-esteem of the secretaries without raising their pay. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Automatically printing eMAILs Nahh, no problems here, just though I would point it out for some of the more PC list readers. Glenn - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 1:15 PM Subject: RE: Automatically printing eMAILs Not politically correct for you, Glenn? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Automatically printing eMAILs Ed, I think the term secretaries went out a few years ago, they're called personal assistants or executive assistants these days. Glenn - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 7:29 AM Subject: RE: Automatically printing eMAILs Naw, CEOs have secretaries that can print their e-mail for them. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Martin
RE: The day after superbowl
now that's funny. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Matteson Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 7:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl The only real football game worth watching any more is Army-Navy. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Patriots (finally a sports team to celebrate in boston) :) -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Who won? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl No change there then. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 14:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The day after superbowl Just sitting here starring at the computer screen. Feels like some took my Brain out of my head and just poured Budweiser on in all night. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The day after superbowl
Unfortunately football/soccer is also boring. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl haha, correction - the only 'real football' game worth watching is the one that actually _is_ football, you know, the one based around using your feet to kick the ball... seriously, i do really like 'american football', but it's a bit stop-start and there are way too many stats and ad-breaks. The only real football game worth watching any more is Army-Navy. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Patriots (finally a sports team to celebrate in boston) :) -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Who won? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl No change there then. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 14:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The day after superbowl Just sitting here starring at the computer screen. Feels like some took my Brain out of my head and just poured Budweiser on in all night. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The day after superbowl
There's lot's of theories about that, the number 1 being it's cheap. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl yes, that's why it's the most popular sport in the world. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 15:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Unfortunately football/soccer is also boring. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl haha, correction - the only 'real football' game worth watching is the one that actually _is_ football, you know, the one based around using your feet to kick the ball... seriously, i do really like 'american football', but it's a bit stop-start and there are way too many stats and ad-breaks. The only real football game worth watching any more is Army-Navy. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Patriots (finally a sports team to celebrate in boston) :) -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Who won? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl No change there then. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 14:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The day after superbowl Just sitting here starring at the computer screen. Feels like some took my Brain out of my head and just poured Budweiser on in all night. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
RE: The day after superbowl
nope -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kishore Vara Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl You might change your mind if you watch Manchester United play.. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 15:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Unfortunately football/soccer is also boring. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl haha, correction - the only 'real football' game worth watching is the one that actually _is_ football, you know, the one based around using your feet to kick the ball... seriously, i do really like 'american football', but it's a bit stop-start and there are way too many stats and ad-breaks. The only real football game worth watching any more is Army-Navy. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Patriots (finally a sports team to celebrate in boston) :) -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Who won? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl No change there then. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 14:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The day after superbowl Just sitting here starring at the computer screen. Feels like some took my Brain out of my head and just poured Budweiser on in all night. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER: This email (including attachments) is confidential. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender immediately and delete
RE: The day after superbowl
Someday they may be able to add some other countries to the mix I suppose. But not too many countries play baseball at our level in their country. Japan has a very established league. Not sure about the Central and South American countries. No question they are a great source of outstanding ballplayers. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Neil Hobson Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl A man convinced against his will, Is of the same opinion still. You're all right and you're all wrong. However, I still don't understand the world series baseball, or whatever it's called, that only has 1 country playing it (or is it 2 with Canada?) :-) Neil Hobson Silversands http://www.silversands.co.uk Microsoft Gold Certified Partner For Enterprise Systems For Collaborative Solutions -Original Message- From: Kishore Vara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: 04 February 2002 15:30 Posted To: Exchange Mailing List Conversation: The day after superbowl Subject: RE: The day after superbowl You might change your mind if you watch Manchester United play.. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 15:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Unfortunately football/soccer is also boring. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl haha, correction - the only 'real football' game worth watching is the one that actually _is_ football, you know, the one based around using your feet to kick the ball... seriously, i do really like 'american football', but it's a bit stop-start and there are way too many stats and ad-breaks. The only real football game worth watching any more is Army-Navy. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Patriots (finally a sports team to celebrate in boston) :) -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Who won? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl No change there then. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 14:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The day after superbowl Just sitting here starring at the computer screen. Feels like some took my Brain out of my head and just poured Budweiser on in all night. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
RE: The day after superbowl
running isn't a team sport. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Running is cheaper but it's not as popular. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl There's lot's of theories about that, the number 1 being it's cheap. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl yes, that's why it's the most popular sport in the world. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 15:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Unfortunately football/soccer is also boring. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl haha, correction - the only 'real football' game worth watching is the one that actually _is_ football, you know, the one based around using your feet to kick the ball... seriously, i do really like 'american football', but it's a bit stop-start and there are way too many stats and ad-breaks. The only real football game worth watching any more is Army-Navy. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Patriots (finally a sports team to celebrate in boston) :) -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Who won? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl No change there then. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 14:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The day after superbowl Just sitting here starring at the computer screen. Feels like some took my Brain out of my head and just poured Budweiser on in all night. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: The day after superbowl
Right. I'm sure the kids in neighborhoods all around the world get together and say let's run a relay. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Tuip Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: The day after superbowl The 4x400 meters is. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: Ray Zorz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 7:49 PM Subject: RE: The day after superbowl running isn't a team sport. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Running is cheaper but it's not as popular. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl There's lot's of theories about that, the number 1 being it's cheap. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl yes, that's why it's the most popular sport in the world. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 15:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Unfortunately football/soccer is also boring. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl haha, correction - the only 'real football' game worth watching is the one that actually _is_ football, you know, the one based around using your feet to kick the ball... seriously, i do really like 'american football', but it's a bit stop-start and there are way too many stats and ad-breaks. The only real football game worth watching any more is Army-Navy. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Patriots (finally a sports team to celebrate in boston) :) -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Who won? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl No change there then. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 14:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The day after superbowl Just sitting here starring at the computer screen. Feels like some took my Brain out of my head and just poured Budweiser on in all night. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe
RE: The day after superbowl
We were actually talking about how football(soccer) became the world's number 1 sport, although not necessarily in the US. Yeah, organized sports has it's problems, usually with the parents. And those of us that actually played a lot of those organized sports appreciated having our parents there (usually). I did, and still do, however, feel sorry for those kids whose parents were out of control, or never show up or dump their kids off on the coaches. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Helfer Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl I'm pretty sure all non-organized youth team sports were formally banned in the U.S. sometime during the Reagan administration. Completely replaced by relentlessly organized sporting leagues where all parents strictly attend every event so as to not too cause a psychic breach in Jr.'s self-esteem by implying that he or she is not at all times the center of the universe. Sort of boring for the adults so they spend game time viciously cursing the officials and the other team's spectators. Works really well. Parents at these events rarely bludgeon each other to death over arguments about the officiating or Princess's playing time. Jim Helfer -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Right. I'm sure the kids in neighborhoods all around the world get together and say let's run a relay. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Tuip Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: The day after superbowl The 4x400 meters is. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: Ray Zorz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 7:49 PM Subject: RE: The day after superbowl running isn't a team sport. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Running is cheaper but it's not as popular. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl There's lot's of theories about that, the number 1 being it's cheap. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl yes, that's why it's the most popular sport in the world. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 15:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Unfortunately football/soccer is also boring. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl haha, correction - the only 'real football' game worth watching is the one that actually _is_ football, you know, the one based around using your feet to kick the ball... seriously, i do really like 'american football', but it's a bit stop-start and there are way too many stats and ad-breaks. The only real football game worth watching any more is Army-Navy. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Patriots (finally a sports team to celebrate in boston) :) -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Who won? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl No change there then. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions
RE: The day after superbowl
yabbut compared to many other countries, we don't follow soccer that much. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Ahem. And what country's team is the current Women's World Cup Champion? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ray Zorz Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 12:22 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl We were actually talking about how football(soccer) became the world's number 1 sport, although not necessarily in the US. Yeah, organized sports has it's problems, usually with the parents. And those of us that actually played a lot of those organized sports appreciated having our parents there (usually). I did, and still do, however, feel sorry for those kids whose parents were out of control, or never show up or dump their kids off on the coaches. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Helfer Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:14 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl I'm pretty sure all non-organized youth team sports were formally banned in the U.S. sometime during the Reagan administration. Completely replaced by relentlessly organized sporting leagues where all parents strictly attend every event so as to not too cause a psychic breach in Jr.'s self-esteem by implying that he or she is not at all times the center of the universe. Sort of boring for the adults so they spend game time viciously cursing the officials and the other team's spectators. Works really well. Parents at these events rarely bludgeon each other to death over arguments about the officiating or Princess's playing time. Jim Helfer -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Right. I'm sure the kids in neighborhoods all around the world get together and say let's run a relay. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Tuip Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: The day after superbowl The 4x400 meters is. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: Ray Zorz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 7:49 PM Subject: RE: The day after superbowl running isn't a team sport. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Running is cheaper but it's not as popular. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl There's lot's of theories about that, the number 1 being it's cheap. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl yes, that's why it's the most popular sport in the world. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 15:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Unfortunately football/soccer is also boring. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl haha, correction - the only 'real football' game worth watching is the one that actually _is_ football, you know, the one based around using your feet to kick the ball... seriously, i do really like 'american football', but it's a bit stop-start and there are way too many stats and ad-breaks. The only real football game worth watching any more is Army-Navy. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Patriots (finally a sports team to celebrate in boston) :) -Original Message
RE: The day after superbowl
It's also of limited fun. I ran track for years, and for the life of me I can't figure out why. I really liked playing soccer and baseball. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Matteson Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:16 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Yeah... it's half mental and the other half mental. The majority don't have capacity to keep their mind focused for as long as it takes to complete a 5K, 10K or longer race. John M. -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Running is cheaper but it's not as popular. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl There's lot's of theories about that, the number 1 being it's cheap. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl yes, that's why it's the most popular sport in the world. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 15:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Unfortunately football/soccer is also boring. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl haha, correction - the only 'real football' game worth watching is the one that actually _is_ football, you know, the one based around using your feet to kick the ball... seriously, i do really like 'american football', but it's a bit stop-start and there are way too many stats and ad-breaks. The only real football game worth watching any more is Army-Navy. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Patriots (finally a sports team to celebrate in boston) :) -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Who won? John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl No change there then. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 14:20 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: The day after superbowl Just sitting here starring at the computer screen. Feels like some took my Brain out of my head and just poured Budweiser on in all night. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
RE: The day after superbowl
I dunno how that would be. While I appreciate Aussie rules football as a game, there seems to be more effort to not have the bone-jarring collisions american football encourages. But I am speaking from very limited experience. On the other hand, if the Aussies were so tough, I'd think more would try American football. I think there are a couple playing, notably a punter, and I think an offensive lineman. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Wedderburn Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:12 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: The day after superbowl send them down under for a real game of football, you know, no nancy armour, no swapping players, that sort of thing. - Original Message - From: Ben Schorr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:02 PM Subject: RE: The day after superbowl If you have another contender perhaps they can arrange a match. :) Aloha, -Ben- Ben M. Schorr, MVP-Outlook, CNA, MCPx3 Director of Information Services Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert http://www.hawaiilawyer.com -Original Message- From: Martin Tuip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: The day after superbowl Same counts for winning the Superbowl and naming yourself World Champions ;) -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: Soysal, Serdar [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:57 PM Subject: RE: The day after superbowl LOL! And in wintertime, they block the iced street and it's curling time! -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 2:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Right. I'm sure the kids in neighborhoods all around the world get together and say let's run a relay. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Tuip Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 12:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: The day after superbowl The 4x400 meters is. -- Martin Tuip MVP Exchange Exchange2000 List owner www.exchange-mail.org www.sharepointserver.com -- - Original Message - From: Ray Zorz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 7:49 PM Subject: RE: The day after superbowl running isn't a team sport. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Soysal, Serdar Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Running is cheaper but it's not as popular. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 10:38 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl There's lot's of theories about that, the number 1 being it's cheap. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl yes, that's why it's the most popular sport in the world. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 04 February 2002 15:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Unfortunately football/soccer is also boring. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl haha, correction - the only 'real football' game worth watching is the one that actually _is_ football, you know, the one based around using your feet to kick the ball... seriously, i do really like 'american football', but it's a bit stop-start and there are way too many stats and ad-breaks. The only real football game worth watching any more is Army-Navy. John Matteson; Exchange Manager Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards (404) 239 - 2981 My toys! My toys! I can't do this job without my toys! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9
RE: The day after superbowl
Best of the best. Kind of like hiring an Exchange admin as opposed to just a network admin. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Peoples Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Not ones for multi-tasking are they? -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 5 February 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Yeah well MINIMUM wage in the NFL is about $220,000/yr. And perhaps those tough guys ought to put the pads on and take a hit from Ray Lewis or Levon Kirkland. In the early days of the NFL, many players did play offense and defense. But as the game became more popular, it also became more sophisticated, and as such lead to specialization. The idea is it's the best of the best doing what they do best - run, catch, block, hit, throw. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 3:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: The day after superbowl I think the reason more Aussies dont try is that American football is right down near the bottom of the list of career choices. Soccer (Real Football), Aussie Rules, Rugby Union, Basketball, Rugby League, Baseball, and even Cricket (possibly even Curling) are above American Football. Aussie rules is a bit of a wierd game, sort of a cross between soccer (strategy) and rugby (voilence). Its those damn tight shorts I think. I dont want to spend my weekend looking at lots of men running around in tight shorts *shudder*. Basically the yanks are seen as wimpy for putting on all that padding before playing a game of footy. Rugby League (whilst I cant be called a fan), has about 1/4 the padding of AF, but the tackles are as equally violent. Also those breaks seem to interrupt the flow of the game IMHO damn, we ran 10 yards, better stop for a few minutes to compose ourselves. Oh, and whats the deal with that ghey dancing when they score a touchdown ? Are they surprised they managed to make it to the end of the field without a map ?? I can understand the carrying on with soccer, since goals are few and far between (typically). And why do they have an Defensive and Offensive team, cant the Americans manage to do both ? :) Glenn Australian by Choice - Original Message - From: Ray Zorz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 8:55 AM Subject: RE: The day after superbowl I dunno how that would be. While I appreciate Aussie rules football as a game, there seems to be more effort to not have the bone-jarring collisions american football encourages. But I am speaking from very limited experience. On the other hand, if the Aussies were so tough, I'd think more would try American football. I think there are a couple playing, notably a punter, and I think an offensive lineman. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: The day after superbowl
It's a build-your-own rice dish at Samurai Sam's Fast Food Oriental Restaurant. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sakti Chakravarty Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:54 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl What's a superbowl? -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 5 February 2002 15:14 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Best of the best. Kind of like hiring an Exchange admin as opposed to just a network admin. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Peoples Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 8:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Not ones for multi-tasking are they? -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, 5 February 2002 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: The day after superbowl Yeah well MINIMUM wage in the NFL is about $220,000/yr. And perhaps those tough guys ought to put the pads on and take a hit from Ray Lewis or Levon Kirkland. In the early days of the NFL, many players did play offense and defense. But as the game became more popular, it also became more sophisticated, and as such lead to specialization. The idea is it's the best of the best doing what they do best - run, catch, block, hit, throw. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Glenn Corbett Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 3:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: The day after superbowl I think the reason more Aussies dont try is that American football is right down near the bottom of the list of career choices. Soccer (Real Football), Aussie Rules, Rugby Union, Basketball, Rugby League, Baseball, and even Cricket (possibly even Curling) are above American Football. Aussie rules is a bit of a wierd game, sort of a cross between soccer (strategy) and rugby (voilence). Its those damn tight shorts I think. I dont want to spend my weekend looking at lots of men running around in tight shorts *shudder*. Basically the yanks are seen as wimpy for putting on all that padding before playing a game of footy. Rugby League (whilst I cant be called a fan), has about 1/4 the padding of AF, but the tackles are as equally violent. Also those breaks seem to interrupt the flow of the game IMHO damn, we ran 10 yards, better stop for a few minutes to compose ourselves. Oh, and whats the deal with that ghey dancing when they score a touchdown ? Are they surprised they managed to make it to the end of the field without a map ?? I can understand the carrying on with soccer, since goals are few and far between (typically). And why do they have an Defensive and Offensive team, cant the Americans manage to do both ? :) Glenn Australian by Choice - Original Message - From: Ray Zorz [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 8:55 AM Subject: RE: The day after superbowl I dunno how that would be. While I appreciate Aussie rules football as a game, there seems to be more effort to not have the bone-jarring collisions american football encourages. But I am speaking from very limited experience. On the other hand, if the Aussies were so tough, I'd think more would try American football. I think there are a couple playing, notably a punter, and I think an offensive lineman. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: Outlook Rules Problem
Wouldn't it make more sense to forward the e-mails to the correct person and let them answer it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bowles, John L. Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 7:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem Yea I know this is a bad idea. But they want to use this for 30 days because someone important left the company and they want everyone sending him email to know that he no longer works here. Not my idea! I already told them I don't like it. So if that happens, I'll just sit back here laughing at their stupid a$$es. ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Randal, Phil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:29 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Outlook Rules Problem And what happens to you when someone auto-replies to your auto-reply??? BAD IDEA! Phil - Phil Randal Network Engineer Herefordshire Council Hereford, UK -Original Message- From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 January 2002 14:25 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: FW: Outlook Rules Problem All, I'm trying to setup Auto Reply's to the internet. I've unchecked the box Disable Auto-Replies to the internet Now when I go into Outlook to setup this Rule. I have the rule to check messages when they arrive that was sent to my name. Then I have server send reply using basically an email message back to the user. In the email box I just put in the things I want the user to know, hit save and close. But when I send messages to my mailbox it's not auto-replying back to the internet. It works internally, but not externally. Any suggestions? Thanks, ___ John Bowles Exchange Administrator Enterprise Support Engineering Celera Genomics [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: outlook programming
Go to www.slipstick.com. Lots of products listed, and therefore companies that program. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tener, Richard Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:03 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outlook programming Joyce, Does microsoft do custom programming for companys? Thanks Rich -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 11:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: outlook programming Microsoft. You may of heard of them. Then again, maybe not. Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 31 January 2002 16:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: outlook programming Does anyone know of a company that can program outlook to our companys need? RGDS Rich _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's
He meant Orange County in NY. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's That was just hurtful. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's In ActiveSync - Tools, Options, select Inbox and click the Settings button. Check the boxes of folders you want to sync. [1] [1] I typed this slowly so you boys in Orange County can follow along. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's Under what? :) -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's You just need to select which additional folders you want to sync in ActiveSync. No magic involved. Did you look at the options? -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's I'm going to address this question to Ed Missy primarily, since I'm assuming that working at Compaq, they have a lot of experience with e-mail over an iPaq. But if anyone else knows the answer to this question, feel free to respond. Everyone in our Operations group has an iPaq, Model 3670 with a Socket Low Power Ethernet PCMCIA card in the expansion pack. We have them successfully connecting to the network and sync'ing with the workstations over a 100 mbps switched connection. Here's the difficult part: After sync'ing and opening your Inbox, you have 4 folders to choose from, to look in. They are: Deleted (local) Inbox Outbox Sent I know this behaviour is by default and that there MAY be no workaround for it. However, does a third-party product or a workaround exist that would allow us to see sub-folders to our Inbox, like you can in OWA? TIA, Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network / Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's
Good memory! Anyway, I had to leave. Failed all the tack tests. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy David Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:53 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's Ha! Naw, we Orange County, NY residents are sharp as tacks. Of course, you would know that since you used to be one. -Original Message- From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:26 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's He meant Orange County in NY. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin Blackstone Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's That was just hurtful. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's In ActiveSync - Tools, Options, select Inbox and click the Settings button. Check the boxes of folders you want to sync. [1] [1] I typed this slowly so you boys in Orange County can follow along. -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's Under what? :) -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's You just need to select which additional folders you want to sync in ActiveSync. No magic involved. Did you look at the options? -Original Message- From: Blunt, James H (Jim) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 8:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E-mail and Compaq iPaq's I'm going to address this question to Ed Missy primarily, since I'm assuming that working at Compaq, they have a lot of experience with e-mail over an iPaq. But if anyone else knows the answer to this question, feel free to respond. Everyone in our Operations group has an iPaq, Model 3670 with a Socket Low Power Ethernet PCMCIA card in the expansion pack. We have them successfully connecting to the network and sync'ing with the workstations over a 100 mbps switched connection. Here's the difficult part: After sync'ing and opening your Inbox, you have 4 folders to choose from, to look in. They are: Deleted (local) Inbox Outbox Sent I know this behaviour is by default and that there MAY be no workaround for it. However, does a third-party product or a workaround exist that would allow us to see sub-folders to our Inbox, like you can in OWA? TIA, Jim Blunt Network / E-mail Admin Network / Infrastructure Group Bechtel Hanford, Inc. 509-372-9188 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
RE: MEC 2002: Predictions of a psychic dog
no problem with yahoo. no joy with oracle. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Kevin Miller Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 9:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2002: Predictions of a psychic dog Is it just me can no one else get to www.yahoo.com or www.oracle.com?? --Kevinm M, WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, And Beyond Did I just say that out loud? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Joyce, Louis Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 8:42 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2002: Predictions of a psychic dog Who is the psychic dog? Does Milton have a crystal ball next to his monitor or something? Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 January 2002 16:40 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: MEC 2002: Predictions of a psychic dog Only 3 days? Oh well, at least I can make this one! -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: MEC 2002: Predictions of a psychic dog I bet you all wish you had a psychic dog consultant... well, actually I'll be happy to rent out mine. $12.95 per question and I believe he accepts PayPaw. MEC 2002: Anaheim, CA in October http://www.mail-resources.com/modules.php?op=modloadname=Newsfile=arti cle sid=126mode=order=0 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: How to get sender e-mail addresses from deleted items folder in MS Outlook
I'd suggest you search for some software from bulk e-mailers. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Sachin Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 4:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: How to get sender e-mail addresses from deleted items folder in MS Outlook I have a problem here my boss recieves hundreds of emails every day so he keeps on deleting many of them without giving a serious look at the contents and adresses. Now he wants that even if the mail gets deleted and gets stored in the deleted items folder, he should run a utility and be able to get the email ids of senders of all such messages in the deleted item folder by running the utility at the end of each day. Can any body guide me how to go about writing such a utility or get it somewhere for outlook. The mail server used is MS Exchange 5.5 thanks Sachin _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
