Starting to wind down here... Seasons Greetings!
Well, things are starting to wind down here for the long Christmas Break (5 days is a long time for me!!). I am hoping and praying that none of the servers start singing, RAID arrays roasting on an open fire and that we all get some much needed time with our friends and families. To everyone on the list, I hope you all have a wonderful Christmas (or whatever you celebrate). Peace, Sirius _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics
Oh for the love of God will you take this crap off list... Are you really this challenged that you need to blow your own horn in a virual pissing match on a mailing list? Open a window, stick your head out and breathe the fresh air... Might do you some good. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 1:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics You can be offended all you want, it does not change the FACT that accepting a direct gift from a vendor creates an obvious problem with basic conflict of interest rules. I don't make these rules up all I have stated is that a real or perceived conflict exists. If the argument held no water, then there would be no reason to be offended. It's not exactly a gift. It's a recognition for a contribution pefrormed. There are, admittedly, strings attached, although there are none that I consider to be ethical issues. I completely resent your entire assertion that I am somehow unethical because I accept the title and gifts associated with being an MVP. I will defend my standards of ethics against anyone's, including your poorly defined and indefensible set. In fact, I was nearly fired from my current job because I defended ethical behavior, but the system worked and I am still here. (This was completely unrelated to anything surrounding Microsoft or MVP.) So, let's get back to the real argument. Please either (1) prove how being an MVP is unethical, or (2) go away and let this thread rest. I tire of your repeated extrapolations, digressions, and less-than-brilliant treatises. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 9:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics The flaw here is that that Cisco Certified has clearly defined things that must be met and requires a payment to the vendor to achieve. You must PAY to get the required material. You must PAY to take the tests. You must PAY for the certification. MVP is a gift. There are no explicit requirements and there is no exchange of currency. This is the CLEAR difference between certifications and gifts like MVP. Titles based on criteria that has been successfully met, as in MVP or Cisco Certified, etc., has no ethical issues. It is an earned title that denotes an area of expertise. It is up to those who view the title to determine if the criteria for getting the title warrants a level of trust and respect. Personal gifts from vendors that you make purchasing decisions regarding is unethical. Rules of ethics are necessary in this business. Ceaselessly arguing in order to have the last word is poor use of brain power, poor use of this list and poor use of ethics. Anyone whose priority is to *always* win the fight must sacrifice the truth and good judgment, thereby violating basic ethics. Just another opinion :-) Best Regards,=20 Dan Bartley -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 12:24 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics I got to the first paragraph in your post and pretty much quit reading.=20 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode =lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics SPAM
Yo tickturd... Was it really necessary for you to reply to all these messages with SPAM? Just unsubscribe yourself... Or gripe to the admin's like the rest of us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Troels Majlandt Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 2:24 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: SV: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics SPAM SPAM -Oprindelig meddelelse- Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] På vegne af Jeremy T. Slater Sendt: 22. december 2003 19:54 Til: Exchange Discussions Emne: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics Of course they don't... And we'd prefer not to get involved as well, so kindly, take this off the list. -Original Message- From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics Actually, I have had plenty of people step forward, privately and support me. But they don't want to get involved in the list discussion. I don't need to. I'm not the one spouting ridiculous opinions about ethics. It's clear that you've lost the argument when you can't prove your case, and To whom is it clear? Noone has EVER proven wrong that accepting direct gifts from vendors when you are in an industry that provides services to clients and customers for that vendor that it is NOT a conflict of interest. instead challenge me to prove you wrong. Since you can't prove your assertion, it is not a fact, and therefore it is an opinion. Since your opinion is yours alone (noone else has stepped forward to agree with you) then you have a very small minority opinion. An opinion, I'm afraid to have to explain to you, are only as important as the stature and number of those who hold it. So, it would seem that my position prevails, and your opinion is marginal. Unless you can prove the contrary, you have no basis for arguing that there is an ethical problem with the MVP program. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 10:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics OK, I can be childish as well. You PROVE it. Prove to me that accepting gifts from vendors and then turning around to clients and providing information and services about and from those vendors is NOT a real or perceived conflict of interest. You prove that false. Prove it. It is your opinion, not a fact. Everything you cite is made up in your own mind. Again, you are mixing up fact and opinion. What you believe is not necessarily what is true. That appears to be especially true in that special place known as Deckler-Land. By the way, surrounding your claimed invitation to be an MVP, who invited you and when? I don't recall you ever offering much positive peer support in the forums, but I do recall that you were considered to be a heckler way back before Exchange was even a product with a SKU. I find it hard to believe that you would ever have been welcomed as an MVP. Care to prove this assertion as well? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 10:10 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics You can be offended all you want, it does not change the FACT that accepting a direct gift from a vendor creates an obvious problem with basic conflict of interest rules. I don't make these rules up all I have stated is that a real or perceived conflict exists. If the argument held no water, then there would be no reason to be offended. It's not exactly a gift. It's a recognition for a contribution pefrormed. There are, admittedly, strings attached, although there are none that I consider to be ethical issues. I completely resent your entire assertion that I am somehow unethical because I accept the title and gifts associated with being an MVP. I will defend my standards of ethics against anyone's, including your poorly defined and indefensible set. In fact, I was nearly fired from my current job because I defended ethical behavior, but the system worked and I am still here. (This was completely unrelated to anything surrounding Microsoft or MVP.) So, let's get back to the real argument. Please either (1) prove how being an MVP is unethical, or (2) go away and let this thread rest. I tire of your repeated extrapolations, digressions, and less-than-brilliant
RE: Vicodin, pain medication available
I'm not sure about this one... This is almost on topic. Ever met an Exchange Admin that didn't need a good dose of Vicodin to make it through the day? j/k Sirius -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 12:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, Swynk? Anyone home? -Original Message- From: Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Vicodin, pain medication available take off list http://www.rxsuperstore.biz/a.html _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang = english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HOPE ALIVE FOR THE HOPELESS
Scumbag Spammer. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JOHN SMITH Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 6:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Dear Brethen, May the peace of God the father, the Son and the Holy Spirit be with you all. We are a non profit organisation resides in part of Afica. Our organisation's name is Moses's Hand Foundation. We've decided to erased child abuse and some other things which make the youths to be idles. Our recent research made us to realised that many youths in Africa were initiated to be a frauders, they don't have any good intention or any room for the Lord in their hearts. When you asked them, they have some reasons which might be genuine in their own eyes but in God's eyes there are no excuse. This Foundation now decided to stand on it's feet believing that it will get a good support from International countries to say no to Child Abuse and change the mind of youths for Christ. We decided to have a National Seminars for youth and some other programmes that will make these youths to know that if they can study and work and trust God they can do good in the land by not stealing or do frauding all around. Brethen, we need your assistance, either in monetary terms or materials. Your assistance may be some christian books that we can give these people after this program. whatsoever. Let's join hands to say no child abuse in any form, prostitutions and stealing and frauding in any form. Remember that our Moses needed somebody to raise his hand so that victory can be sure. We shall be glad to read from you if you want to assist us financially or materially.you can visit us online at www.hopealive.wsmcafe.com Shalom Best Regards Bro. John Smith _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement
If this is the original exchange server in the group, there is some additional steps to perform, if memory serves me correct. Sirius -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeremy T. Slater Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:51 PM To: Exchange Discussions This will occur at the same time that we are physically moving these folks in to a new office, so maybe its not the best time to go testing DR plans. :o) -Original Message- From: Waters, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement They will move with MAPI, however if you really wanted to keep the same server name, this sounds like a great time to test your DR plans and procedures. -Original Message- From: Jeremy T. Slater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 5:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange 2000 Server Replacement Greetings! I am going to throw out a question, showing my obvious exchange ignorance. We have 4 Exchange Mail Servers in our Organization and we need to replace one of them, as the box is old and slow. This server serves about 100 mailboxes. I am assuming I can build out the new server, install exchange and just move the mailboxes to the new server. The only problem I see with this, is having to reconfigure all of the clients to point to the new server. I would really like to keep the server name the same, but don't think it is possible. Any ideas? Thanks, Jeremy --- Jeremy T. Slater Network Administrator MMA Financial, LLC - http://www.mmafin.com 727.373.8153 - Direct 727.461.4801 - Receptionist 727.443.6067 - Fax [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and SAN
We have an exchange 2k server with 800 users, roughly 71 gb private store running on an HP MSA1000 and it works great. I would even venture to say that it runs better than it did on the local drives. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rosales, Mario Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Has anyone ran Exchange in a SAN, and were there any issues with it? I've always had a raid array attached to it which could be the same thing but did not know if there were any major differences? Any help would be appreciate it. Thanks, Mario *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
We've been testing it on a 400 node network and have been fairly impressed with it. It does have some flaws, but so far, does it's job. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 10:45 AM To: Exchange Discussions As subject really, trialling it now on some of our servers and it looks quite impressive for the cost (which isn't very much). Anyone using it and have any good experiences or any horror stories using it? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
Yeah, that has been our observation as well. We have scanned machines in batches of 50 and it does get VERY SLOW during the scans. Hoping it is something they will work on in future releases. Sirius -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions The free version is certainly worth the price, but the memory usage and slow response when trying to execute against even the maximum number of free supported servers has prompted me to look elsewhere for a solution I'd invest $ in. YMMV -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, September 08, 2003 9:45 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it? Subject: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it? As subject really, trialling it now on some of our servers and it looks quite impressive for the cost (which isn't very much). Anyone using it and have any good experiences or any horror stories using it? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
Takes us about 30-40 minutes to do full scans on 50 machines. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Could you define slow? I mean hours or ?/machine From: Sirius F. Crackhoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it? Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:07:44 -0400 Yeah, that has been our observation as well. We have scanned machines in batches of 50 and it does get VERY SLOW during the scans. Hoping it is something they will work on in future releases. Sirius -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions The free version is certainly worth the price, but the memory usage and slow response when trying to execute against even the maximum number of free supported servers has prompted me to look elsewhere for a solution I'd invest $ in. YMMV -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, September 08, 2003 9:45 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it? Subject: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it? As subject really, trialling it now on some of our servers and it looks quite impressive for the cost (which isn't very much). Anyone using it and have any good experiences or any horror stories using it? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Fast, faster, fastest: Upgrade to Cable or DSL today! https://broadband.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it?
IMHO, it's slow to me, especially when scanning 400+ machines. :) It's all in the eyes of the beholder. :) Sirius -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hutchings Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions See I wouldn't call that particularly slow, I don't know if I could put a figure on what I would consider slow, but that's the sort of figure that sounds acceptable, but it probably bloody annoying idf you're sat watching it :-) I think I read something on the shavlik newsgroups about a registry patch that increases the simultaneous connections/performance? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Sirius F. Crackhoe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 September 2003 18:17 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it? Takes us about 30-40 minutes to do full scans on 50 machines. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 12:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Could you define slow? I mean hours or ?/machine From: Sirius F. Crackhoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it? Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:07:44 -0400 Yeah, that has been our observation as well. We have scanned machines in batches of 50 and it does get VERY SLOW during the scans. Hoping it is something they will work on in future releases. Sirius -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 11:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions The free version is certainly worth the price, but the memory usage and slow response when trying to execute against even the maximum number of free supported servers has prompted me to look elsewhere for a solution I'd invest $ in. YMMV -Original Message- From: Paul Hutchings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Posted At: Monday, September 08, 2003 9:45 AM Posted To: swynk Conversation: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it? Subject: OT - Shavlik HFNetchkPro, anyone use it? As subject really, trialling it now on some of our servers and it looks quite impressive for the cost (which isn't very much). Anyone using it and have any good experiences or any horror stories using it? regards, Paul -- Paul Hutchings Network Administrator, MIRA Ltd. Tel: 44 (0)24 7635 5378, Fax: 44 (0)24 7635 8378 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode= lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Fast, faster, fastest: Upgrade to Cable or DSL today! https://broadband.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http
RE: Cant create public fodler(plz help)
ROTFLMAO That made my day!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David J. Taylor Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 5:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Try new public fondle instead, doesn't work any better but feels great :) Hi all, Im having problem in creating Public fodles using ESM. when i click on new + public fodler it is not showing me the create new public folder screen.Rather it is sitting idle. Neither prompting error not creating public fodler. However, when i tried to create new folder using OWA it is reporting error in application log: [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed an operation on folder /O=4RT6JU8EXU/OU=137FRGJU9E/CN=RECIPIENTS/CN=INTERNE T NEWSGROUPS on database First Storage Group\Public Folder Store (XCHANGE) because the user did not have the following access rights: 'Delete' 'Read Property' 'Write Property' 'Create Message' 'View Item' 'Create Subfolder' 'Write Security Descriptor' 'Write Owner' 'Read Security Descriptor' 'Contact' The entry ID of the folder is in the data section of this event. I have tried by giving Full control to every one using ESM. Still not able to create Public folders. I have installed Exchange 2000 server on WIndows service pack4.(Is ther any issues with service pack4). So waht i m supposed to do..Plz help me Thx regards satish jupalli _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
