RE: Single Use E-Mail?
I will. For my personal mail I have a catch-all account. When I sign up for paypal for example I use paypal@mypersonaldomain.com. If I start to get spam on [EMAIL PROTECTED] I just start sending mail sent to that address into a black hole. Note: I'm not suggesting that Paypal sells address's. Although this method is a good way to find out who does. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David, Andy Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 5:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Single Use E-Mail? I dont think this will reduce unwanted email. -Original Message- From: David Hekimian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 5:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Single Use E-Mail? I'd like to allow my users to create a single use e-mail address to help reduce unwanted e-mail. - User mailbox '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' This user can create any new e-mail address by adding a suffix (with a special char '-' for example) such as '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'. All suffixes are by default allowed. There would need to be a method that would allow the user to blacklist a specific suffix. My idea would be to create an EventSink for Exch 2000/2003 that when a message is addressed to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' it would parse the LHS of the @ and then do a lookup in a table to see if the blacklist existed. If it did, then it would return a '550 Mailbox does not exist' error code. If it does not exist, then the To: Field would be rewritten to strip out the '-suffix' and deliver the mail to the intended recipient '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Questions: 1. Does something already exist today that does this? An event sink? 3rd Party App (MailMarshal, GFI MailEssentials)? Freeware on Linux, etc? 2. I've already coded the basic functionality for the database look and web interface to modify the blacklist but the Event Sink is causing me some issues. Anyone have experience in Event Sink programming willing to jump in an help with the development? 3. Is this a crazy idea and I should just abandon it? - David _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exch2003 GAL update problem?
Which version of Outlook? If it's Outlook 2003 in cached mode it's because Outlook is using a OAB, which is only updated by default once a night. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message- From: Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 2:45 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exch2003 GAL update problem? When creating new mail objects it is taking roughly 24 hours before they appear in the GAL to MAPI clients. My first thought was the RUS, but I have created some new objects and done the following: 1. Opened the default GAL object in ESM and did a preview to see if the new objects appeared there. They do. 2. Verified that the new objects have teh showinAddressbook attribute populated (along with the other attributes that the RUS populates...all checked out ok). I can send mail to the new objects though thier proxy addresses, but the object do not appear in the GAL and I am having a rough time figuring out why. My environment is a native Exchange 2003\Windows 2003 environment (inplace upgraded). Has anyone else seen this or have a suggestion on something that I might try or check? Thanks, Steve _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations
MailScanner with SpamAssassin. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message- From: Chinnery, Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 8:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations They didn't rank very high in Network World's test of anti-spam vendors, though. NWfusion has a nice table though: http://www.nwfusion.com/bg/2003/spam/results.jsp?category=Server (I've been tasked to find almost the same thing except they're more concerned about spam. We already use Trend's AV product which I swear by. Ever since we installed Trend we haven't had a virus outbreak.) Paul Chinnery Network Administrator Mem Med Ctr -Original Message- From: Rob Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: New AV Gateway Recommendations Something from GFI? Regards, Rob Ellis IT Manager Samsara Group plc Tel 023 9224 7979 Mob 07974 111867 MCP BEng(hons) -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 01 October 2003 16:29 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: New AV Gateway Recommendations I'm looking for a new AV gateway product. I'm looking for something that has the following features. Right now we use NAI Websheild SMTP gateway which does a pretty good job but is getting rather dated and it does not appear that this program will updated past its 4.5 version. The program has some nice features, but anything NAI blows, the support gets worse by the day, so I want to move on. The current setup I have is a single server that receives to WebSheild for AV scanning and keyword content filtering. Then it passes it on via port 26 to my MailFrontier for antispam scanning (both run on the same box) which then finally passes it on to the Exchange server boxen on port 25 just like usual. Here are the features I am looking for * Keyword Blocking * The ability to turn anti spam off and just use keyword blocking. * AV scanner * Ability to pass the mail on another port (such as when an AV gateway and an Antispam gateway are on the same box) * Recipient Exclusion * Sender exclusion (allow mail to pass directly from specified email addresses without scanning for content or virus's) * Originator Blocking (just dump any email that comes from specified persons) * A bonus would be that if it could do a lookup against my GAL and just dump any email for an address that does not exist * Must run on Wintel platform * Customizeable NDR's for content filtering, etc Martin Blackstone Director, Information Technologies Microsoft Exchange MVP Superior Access Insurance Services 949.470.2111 x279 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and SAN
Yeah but that's not necessarily because it was a SAN. If you double the number of disks the databases are on for example your going to see a performance increase, whether it's DAS or SAN. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 6:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and SAN Just to add my 2 bits We moved our Exchange 5.5 running on win2k from direct attached disk raid 5 to a IBM ESS 2105 Shark, and we saw about 300 to 400% performance increase. -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 10:19 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and SAN Clarification Windows 2000 and Exchange 5.5 -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 11:17 AM To: 'Exchange Discussions' Subject: Exchange and SAN Has anyone ran Exchange in a SAN, and were there any issues with it? I've always had a raid array attached to it which could be the same thing but did not know if there were any major differences? Any help would be appreciate it. Thanks, Mario *** The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. *** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and SAN
Mark Twain said: Put all your eggs in one basket, and watch that basket. Seriously though if you have good SAN hardware, the uptime on that equipment is amazing. You have to remember that everything is redundant. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message- From: Dean Cunningham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 3:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and SAN I can't get past the concept that if the SAN dies (ie FC card or Power Supplies) then all teh servers you have attached to it are dead in the water. Sounds like a quasi mainframe to me. I still prefer many eggs and many baskets and take the disk hit. Mind you I would be interested in SAN technology just to put the tape drives external to the server room (like a few miles away via fibre) cheers Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED] 20/09/2003 7:52:42 a.m. I'll kindly ask you to get off of my soapbox. My favorite one I've heard lately: Well, it uses fiber to attach to the SAN so it's much faster for Exchange. -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 2:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and SAN As long as you don't buy into the great white lie of SAN's, you're golden. That lie is that there's no performance hit created by taking a single large array and carving it into a bunch of LUNs - there's a physics issue there. Other than that, its just a bunch of disks, just like the SCSI attached ones you probably have now. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Rosales, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 12:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange and SAN Has anyone ran Exchange in a SAN, and were there any issues with it? I've always had a raid array attached to it which could be the same thing but did not know if there were any major differences? Any help would be appreciate it. Thanks, Mario ** * The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. ** * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** Northland State of the Environment Report 2002 now online at www.nrc.govt.nz ** NORTHLAND REGIONAL COUNCIL This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Exchange and SAN
Anything newer than a F840 is a NAS/SAN. It's a traditional NAS and you can have block level access to a LUN via FC, just like a traditonal SAN. It would be like taking an EMC and sticking a Ethernet NIC on it. Also anything newer than the 800 series gives you iSCSI for free. It will be interesting to see how quickly Exchange and iSCSI come along. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message- From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 11:51 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and SAN I thought NetApp only made NAS boxes, not SANs. Oh, yeah - snapshots don't work, but a local backup to disk (with NTBackup) would most likely smoke. -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange and SAN I have run into this in a couple of situations. One where we had a cluster communicating to a SAN and the other where we had a single member server talking to a SAN. In both cases I have seen network communications problems result in the IS shutting down because the SA can't talk to it. In the cluster environment the Cluster Server restarts the service just fine after about 5 minutes. In the single server environment I have seen this occur as well. However, I have also seen where the SAN (Network Appliance) corrupted the file because there was a backup going on at the same time the snapshot was being taken. In this case we simply do a snapshot restore and we are back up in about 15-20 minutes. In this case we adjusted the backup job to start well after the snapshot was taken and haven't had any problems since. I hope this helps. Nate Couch EDS Messaging -- From: Rosales, Mario Reply To: Exchange Discussions Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 11:16 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:Exchange and SAN Has anyone ran Exchange in a SAN, and were there any issues with it? I've always had a raid array attached to it which could be the same thing but did not know if there were any major differences? Any help would be appreciate it. Thanks, Mario ** * The contents of this communication are intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose this communication and notify the sender. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this communication that do not relate to the official business of my company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. ** * _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=la ng=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security
It doesn't, but it keeps people from reusing credentials. At least I believe that's the posters point. Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security I don't see how that would stop key-logging. Ed --- Greg Marr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have set up our OWA to require two-factor authentication (SecurID) which eliminates any key-logging concerns but this system is not cheap at approx $300 AU ($160 US) per user. The upside is that you can use the same system to authenticate all of your remote access users (dial-up, VPN, etc) and this is the function that really allows me to sleep well at night. I guess that it all depends on how many people are going to require this functionality and of course, your budget. Greg -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 18 September 2003 10:07 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security We talked about this exact scenario. We decided that given how easy it is to install a key logger, and other malware, on public systems we decided it was too risky. We are planning on using public folders quite heavily with data that we can't risk getting out. Same with the address books. We are trying to figure out a way to give people access to email only from a public terminal. No public folders or address books. If you have any suggestions, that would be great. Erick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Crowley Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 4:40 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security ISA is a better solution in a DMZ because it doesn't require the plethora of holes in the internal firewall. http://www.microsoft.com/technet/treeview/default.asp?url=/tec hnet/prodtechnol/isa/deploy/isaexch.asp Requiring VPN (your other message) is a good idea, however, you may be coming back to ISA or some other idea when your users demand to be able to get e-mail from a coffeehouse kiosk terminal. Ed --- Erick Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have to admit to being a little confused, how would ISA help, aside from being a proxy? Which isn't nothing, but I'm wondering if I'm missing something else. Thanks, Erick -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Webb, Andy Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 7:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security Don't forget you also have to fully protect the front end server from all the other servers on the DMZ from which it is not isolated. Those other systems may have been placed on the DMZ in an insecure state with the thought that if anyone broke them, they would be isolated from the internal LAN. What happens when you put the FE in the DMZ is you break that theory. The DMZ is no longer isolated from the LAN. You definitely have to secure the FE, but once you have, why not put it inside where it is not at risk from questionable systems on the DMZ? Better to put an ISA server in the DMZ as was suggested earlier. Regarding IPSEC, Exchange 2003 explicitly states that IPSEC is now supported between front end and back end. So if you upgrade, that's perhaps an option. Though a lesser one than using ISA imho. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leeann McCallum Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 6:32 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security You could throw an OWA front end server in the DMZ, put certificate on as Ed suggests, and then wrap everything up in an IPSEC packet that goes between the front end and backend. Between the client on the net and the front end, you would use SSL, so just open 443. -Original Message- From: Erick Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 17 September 2003 11:29 a.m. To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA front end server - licensing and security Ed, I'm a little confused. You're recommending that I put in a front end server, but not in the DMZ? It seems to me that I might have to open a bunch of ports, but if the front end server is in the LAN, all ports are by default open. Just to clarify, I have one Exchange server which lives on my LAN
RE: Mailbox moves completed, but....
Where does AD say the mailbox is? Has c run on the old database lately? Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message- From: Mitchell Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 3:30 PM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: Duncan Scott Subject: Mailbox moves completed, but Good afternoon, I have completed moving 1700+ mailboxes from one server to the other. We are using Outlook 98 Exchange Windows 2000. After the moves were completed I have a few stray mailboxes that are hanging around that are duplicated on the two servers. Under total K they show 0K, even though the mailbox on the correct server (the one moved to) show the correct space 58,098K. I am afraid if we delete the mailbox on the almost empty server, we will delete the real mailbox. So we don't want to do that. We could dump the mailbox to a PST, delete the mailbox and restore the mailbox, but that would cause problems because all communications to the old mailbox would be severed and people couldn't do replies to the eMAILs that are sitting in the mailbox. Meetings couldn't be canceled. What a quandary. What do we do? Just turn off the server and clean it off.. I don't think so. Thanks for any help you might have. Regards, Mike Mitchell Systems email Administrator Alverno Information Services * [EMAIL PROTECTED] *:(317) 783-9341 EXT. 6211 Education is when you read the fine print, experience is what you get when you don't! - Pete Seeger _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Another NAV for Exchange Question
It does. You list it as a file in a file filter, then don't check the box that says block (or something along those lines) Steve Evans SDSU Foundation -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 12:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Another NAV for Exchange Question I'm not sure that exists in Antigen either, though I don't have their latest Beta yet. -Original Message- From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 11:57 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Another NAV for Exchange Question I have not seen this ability in NAV for Exchange. -Original Message- From: Woods, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 1:53 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Another NAV for Exchange Question Hello, NT 4 SP6a Exch 5.5 SP4 NAV for Exch 2.18 With the attachment blocking in NAV, is it possible to exclude certain files by exact file name? We have Faxination here and it's forms call two exe's to produce the forms. Their support said that Antigen and/or Trend have the ability to exclude certain files from the file blocking process. Does NAV? They weren't sure and I can't find anything to that effect on their support site. Thanks in advance. Cheers, Tony _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Securing Outlook
Then anyone can go in and change it back. Steve Evans Computing Services SDSU Foundation 619 594-0653 -Original Message- From: Slinger, Gary [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 9:11 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Securing Outlook Set her authentication type to None instead of Password. -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 17:06 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Securing Outlook Dear All, We have a reception computer that is logged on under the receptionists name 24/7 This is because it runs Zetafax, which in standard form, needs to have a single person nominated for receiving all our faxes. This receptionist works until 3:00pm at which time the PC is left switched on and logged on under her name so that others can distribute faxes. The issue has arisen of securing her email, which when logged on under her username, can just be viewed by opening Exchange. I don't want her to have to log off and back on under another user name to access her email, it needs to be available from her logon. I also want to stay away from configuring Outlook in internet mode and having messages delivered to a PST. I have played around with the settings, but as far as I can see, you cant set a password on a profile, only on a data file such as a PST. Outlook XP on Win2k with Exchange 5.5 Thanks for any advice Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Attachments to block
http://www.swinc.com/resource/e2kfaq_appxj.htm Steve Evans Computing Services SDSU Foundation 619 594-0653 -Original Message- From: Niki Blowfield : Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 1:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Attachments to block Dear All, I havent had any success searching the archives to get the answer to this no doubt frequentley asked question Does anyone have a resource for a list of attachments that should be blocked at our Exchange Server? We have Trend Scanmail which makes it very easy to block attachments, and I have put into here manually some extensions that I believe should be stopped, as well as some I have picked up from web searches. Is it reasonable to block all htm/html attachments? One of our clients got an alert about the Klez virus last week, which it found in an attached htm file which was in the Temp internet folder cache, Officescan quarantined it okay. This threw me somewhat as I assumed we would be protected by an up to date Scanmail looking for the various BAT EXE or SCR extensions Any examples of a list of file extensions you block would be great Also, apart from the newest MS Security Bulletins, is the windowsupdate site a reliable way of keeping clients and servers secure? Obviously we pay particular attention to updates on our servers, but rely on windowsupdate alone to keep our clients up to date Thanks... Nik _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Really annoying when you disable an account.
Set the account to expire after a certain date (like today). That way no one can use the account but it doesn't cause the same problems as disabling the account. Steve Evans Computing Services SDSU Foundation 619 594-0653 -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 12:36 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Really annoying when you disable an account. Well that kind of sucks. That's what I was hoping you weren't saying :P Crud... what's the point of disabling an account if you have to create a temp account to associate with the old mailbox? Since you can only have one account associated with a mailbox, I will have to create a lot of accounts to do this. Wow, how lame. Thanks a lot for the help though. wilson -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 9:49 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Really annoying when you disable an account. You explained it perfectly. I responded with what I thought was a perfectly clear solution, which is also explained in the text of the event log error message. Go create another, active account named Zaphod Beeblebrox and associate that mailbox with it. Note that it doesn't have to be named Zaphod Beeblebrox, it could also be named Peter Tosh. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Friday, May 03, 2002 11:10 AM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Really annoying when you disable an account. Subject: RE: Really annoying when you disable an account. Yes Exchange 2000. I think I didn't explain this too well. I WANT to disable an account because the user left the firm. I DON'T want to delete the account and mailbox for 30 to 60 days just in case someone needs to access it. But once I disable the account, the damn errors pop up constantly. How do I tell the system, hey, this user is no longer with the firm so I'm going to disable his account. But don't delete the account and quit sending me dumb errors? Thanks, Wilson -Original Message- From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 10:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Really annoying when you disable an account. Exchange 2000? Associate an active account with the mailbox. -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 11:11 PM Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List Conversation: Haiku Friday Subject: RE: Really annoying when you disable an account. Anyone have any info on this or am I SOL? Thank in advance. Wilson -Original Message- From: Varghese, Wilson Sent: Friday, April 26, 2002 8:48 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Really annoying when you disable an account. How come when you disable an account for a user that has left the company, you get a billion event 9548s? This is so damn annoying, is there a way to turn it off? Besides, I just disabled the account, I didn't remove it's master account SID so what's the problem? Is there a way to stop this event error from popping up all the time? Thanks, Wilson _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Cerification question
Depends what you want to do now doesn't it. I'm an E-mail Administrator. I have an Exchange server and an iPlanet Mail server. I should know about Windows 2000, Active Directory, SMTP, Exchange, iPlanet, Sun, etc. Having an understanding of TCP/IP is nice, but I don't need to know how to configure a Cisco router. That's not what I do. That's why we have a Network Adminstrator. To say Cisco is the premier certification is bull crap. That's like saying everyone should become a Lawyer because that is the premier field to study. Steve Evans Computing Services SDSU Foundation 619 594-0653 -Original Message- From: Smith Thomas Contr 911 SPTG/SC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 11:58 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Cerification question There is a big sqaubble about the best certification to get( and this was being discussed at Ohio State) That if you was going to get any type of certification EXCHANGE IS NOT THE ONE to get, Cisco is the premier certification.One of the speakers was telling a senior class this before graduation starts. Do anyone agree with that or does it make a difference? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: What hotfixes/patches after Sp2?
http://www.microsoft.com/exchange/techinfo/deployment/2000/BestConfig.as p Steve Evans Computing Services SDSU Foundation 619 594-0653 -Original Message- From: Leo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 8:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: What hotfixes/patches after Sp2? William, thanks for your reply but what I am looking for is a list of post Exchange SP2 patches that may need applying regardless of whether we are seeing any errors. For example security patches that plug holes that we may have and don't know about etc. Leo _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Pulling a email out of the DB?
That's why we suggested exmerge. Steve Evans Computing Services SDSU Foundation 619 594-0653 -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:47 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pulling a email out of the DB? I went with the recall, mostly cause I didn't have any exmerge experience(I'll play with that in a dev environment). Oddly enough the recall got the job done in a less then desirable fashion. It emailed everyone in the company that so and so want to recall the message and it didn't actually recall the message till each person opened the recall notice. It was kind of confusing to the users. I wish it actually had just deleted the emails and kept quiet. I'll use exmerge next time. e- -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 9:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject:RE: Pulling a email out of the DB? Aah that's right. My bad. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 11:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pulling a email out of the DB? Unless users had delivery set to a PST file (reason 6,397 PST=BAD). -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 10:25 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pulling a email out of the DB? The recall message crap is not guaranteed to work. The only way he can be 100% sure that it is removed is to use ExMerge with the filters and archive option in place, as was suggested by several fine individuals already. Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Moore, David K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 11:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Pulling a email out of the DB? Log into the users mailbox, go to their sent items folder, open the message, ACTIONS|RECALL MESSAGE. It will recall all messages but then again they should have never sent out a message that large and the MTA's should have had a limit set on them (such as 4/8/12mb). david -Original Message- From: Hansen, Eric [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 15, 2002 10:31 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Pulling a email out of the DB? Hi In a bit of frustration here, I had a new employee form our HR department decide to send out a 16 meg word document to everyone in the company. This wouldn't normally effect most of the users but it will effect our 40 or so remote users who use modems and possibly some other users who have more stuff in their mailboxes. Is there a way I can pull this email from the system in its entirety without downing the server or restarting any major services? Any help is greatly appreciated. e- _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Installing Exchange Server through TS
Correct me if I'm wrong, but you can't install Exchange 5.5 on Windows 2000. The only way you can have Exchange 5.5 on Windows 2000 is if you had 5.5 and NT4 and you upgraded to Windows 2000. Steve Evans Computing Services SDSU Foundation 619 594-0653 -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 11:01 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Installing Exchange Server through TS You don't need to modify any registry key to do it. What is the exact error you're getting? Serdar Soysal -Original Message- From: Chris H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 1:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Installing Exchange Server through TS Does anyone recall the registry key you have to modify to allow you to install Exchange Server 5.5 while logged in though a windows 2000 Terminal Session (admin mode)? TIA Chris _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: I need to send emails as another ....
On a new message click view - From Field. There you can put in any name as long as you have permission to send as that person. Steve Evans Computing Services SDSU Foundation 619 594-0653 -Original Message- From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 3:04 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: I need to send emails as another Did I get this right? - You are an Exchange administrator. - You want to send an e-mail message from your PC. - You want to be logged in as you. - You want to be in your personal copy of Outlook. - You want the header of the message, when it is received, to indicate that the sender was someone else. Nah, I must have read it wrong. -Original Message- From: Culebro, Enrique [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 2:43 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: I need to send emails as another Hello everyone: I need to send emails as another (not on behalf of) from my personal Outlook account, is this possible?. Also, the other person should not be accessible when users create an email. Thanks for your help... Enrique _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
