Re: HTTP error 404 and OWA
that is right it only works on the BE server. - Original Message - From: Neil Hobson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 12:16 AM Subject: RE: HTTP error 404 and OWA Does OWA work on the back-end server only? Neil -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of M2web Posted At: 22 December 2003 21:39 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days) Conversation: HTTP error 404 and OWA Subject: HTTP error 404 and OWA I have a FE/BE configuration with Exchange 2003. When I use the URL http://FE server/Exchange, I get the Window's Security popup but after login I get two frames each of them with HTTP error 404, File or Directory not found. I do not have URLScan nor have I run IISlockdown tool. Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any view or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Silversands. If you have received this email in error, or if you believe this email is unsolicited and wish to be removed from any future mailings, please contact our Support Desk immediately on 01202 360360 or email [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.silversands.co.uk _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
HTTP error 404 and OWA
I have a FE/BE configuration with Exchange 2003. When I use the URL http://FE server/Exchange, I get the Window's Security popup but after login I get two frames each of them with HTTP error 404, File or Directory not found. I do not have URLScan nor have I run IISlockdown tool. Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA Front/back end in Cluster
If I'd asked, he probably would have answered why cluster etc? (I have seen his responses to other folks wanting to cluster), Which frankly I do not think it is any ones business why we want to cluster. I asked a question if he does not have an intelligent answer he should not reply no matter if you think he is one of the biggest folks or not. - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 1:44 PM Subject: RE: OWA Front/back end in Cluster Ed C. is one of the brightest folks we have here. He may have 'alternative' answers and very 'direct' answers, but they will never be 'unintelligent.' You'd do well to ask him to explain what he meant, you might learn something. Good luck. David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of M2web Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: OWA Front/back end in Cluster I am trying to be very professional on this discussion group and ask a question that I have a problem with and if no one has an answer or wishes not to comment on it that is fine. However if your brain is clogged or you are having a bad day and can not give any constructive comments (because you have no idea how an E2K3 cluster works) then keep your unintelligent remarks to yourself. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 7:55 PM Subject: RE: OWA Front/back end in Cluster While you're doing all that, you might as well enable brick backups, have all your users download all their mail to their PSTs using POP, collect your mail from your ISP using a POP remailer, and have your file-based virus scanner scan the M: drive. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of M2web Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Front/back end in Cluster I have setup an Active/passive cluster with a front end/backend config behind a firewall. Firewall has been configured to pass HTTP to the front end server. If on a computer outside the firewall I type the URL of the OWA, I get the Windows authentication screen but having entered the username and password the URL changes to the inside FQN of the EVS and I get a blank white screen. However if I do the same thing from a computer from within the firewall I still get the FQN of EVS in the URL address but I also get the OWA! What have I not done or done that it is causing this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=; lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA Front/back end in Cluster
I am trying to be very professional on this discussion group and ask a question that I have a problem with and if no one has an answer or wishes not to comment on it that is fine. However if your brain is clogged or you are having a bad day and can not give any constructive comments (because you have no idea how an E2K3 cluster works) then keep your unintelligent remarks to yourself. - Original Message - From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 7:55 PM Subject: RE: OWA Front/back end in Cluster While you're doing all that, you might as well enable brick backups, have all your users download all their mail to their PSTs using POP, collect your mail from your ISP using a POP remailer, and have your file-based virus scanner scan the M: drive. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of M2web Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Front/back end in Cluster I have setup an Active/passive cluster with a front end/backend config behind a firewall. Firewall has been configured to pass HTTP to the front end server. If on a computer outside the firewall I type the URL of the OWA, I get the Windows authentication screen but having entered the username and password the URL changes to the inside FQN of the EVS and I get a blank white screen. However if I do the same thing from a computer from within the firewall I still get the FQN of EVS in the URL address but I also get the OWA! What have I not done or done that it is causing this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: OWA Front/back end in Cluster
I had done your suggestions actually before sending the email by both entering the domain name and removing it for both cases of Integrated and/or basic authentication. Thanks - Original Message - From: Brian Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 1:57 AM Subject: RE: OWA Front/back end in Cluster I think Ed must have had a bad day!! Try looking at the IIS authentication settings of your back-end servers (possibly front-end as well) and set the authentication to disable anonymous and enable Integrated Windows and/or Basic (and set the domain). Regards Brian Brian Davies - Network Operations Manager University of East London E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: 0208 223 2091 Mobile: 07711 198349 -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [MVP] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 November 2003 03:56 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: OWA Front/back end in Cluster While you're doing all that, you might as well enable brick backups, have all your users download all their mail to their PSTs using POP, collect your mail from your ISP using a POP remailer, and have your file-based virus scanner scan the M: drive. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of M2web Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: OWA Front/back end in Cluster I have setup an Active/passive cluster with a front end/backend config behind a firewall. Firewall has been configured to pass HTTP to the front end server. If on a computer outside the firewall I type the URL of the OWA, I get the Windows authentication screen but having entered the username and password the URL changes to the inside FQN of the EVS and I get a blank white screen. However if I do the same thing from a computer from within the firewall I still get the FQN of EVS in the URL address but I also get the OWA! What have I not done or done that it is causing this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang= english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OWA Front/back end in Cluster
I have setup an Active/passive cluster with a front end/backend config behind a firewall. Firewall has been configured to pass HTTP to the front end server. If on a computer outside the firewall I type the URL of the OWA, I get the Windows authentication screen but having entered the username and password the URL changes to the inside FQN of the EVS and I get a blank white screen. However if I do the same thing from a computer from within the firewall I still get the FQN of EVS in the URL address but I also get the OWA! What have I not done or done that it is causing this? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MailMarshal
Has anyone been able to get help or even download MailMarshal's latest updates since they were bought by NetIQ? It seems that they never answer any calls and have become as bad as GFI. Trend Micro is sounding better and better every day. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clustering questions
I have setup a 2+1 cluster node in our lab (two active one passive)as back-end server plus a front-end server. It looks like that the cluster works as far as when one shuts down a node the passive node takes over the services of that node, or even when the network cable is unplugged. However, there are three qustions that I have not been able to answer or find any on, would anyone have any insight, any help would be appreciated? they are: 1. when one node is shut down, the services are seen in the cluster administrator to be taken over by the passive node Should not the services fall back to the original node when it is on line again? Or must this be done manually which then does it not mean that the serivces to be moved must first be taken offline and then the ownership moved which defeats clustering purpose? 2. When the node which had taken over all the services was shut down , I got errors that MTA data could not be saved and looking at the cluster administrator on the first node it says that the cluster has failed! But should not the first node server take over immediately (10 secs)? 3. In all the papers that I read, it is mentioned that if one has a front-end server that on each exchange virtual node an HTTP connection be mapped to the front-end. Follwing the procedure of creating the HTTP, I can not start the service unless I take offline the automatically created HTTP service which was created when Exchange SA was installed by the server itself! But according to the papers I should have, not only the one which was created automatially but also have the mapped ones too!? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marshal Software for Exchange
Does anyone use Mail Marshal. What has your experience been with them lately regarding their Support? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size?
No I am not lying. We took over their company and the Management did not want to offend them so I was told to leave them alone. it takes them about 11.3 hrs to back up fully and they use Arcghhh Serve too! We just got bigger by also taking over another company but their admin has a sense of reality. - Original Message - From: Woodruff, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:43 AM Subject: RE: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? Please say you are lying... I would hate to see your company get any bigger. If so, you are in trouble. -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? We have in of our sites 100 people and 121GB IS (one VP has 2.53 Million emails with 2.1 M of them unread since 1999 and will not allow anyone to delete them), use DLT to backup. - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:59 AM Subject: RE: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? About 25gbs(200 users), Using Benchmark DLT1 backup device with native Microsoft Windows 2000 backup module (NTBackup). Raj -Original Message- From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? Pete, We have about ~55 gb or so (Exchange 2k w/3 storage groups) Using Backup Exec and a Compaq TL890 Storage Library. === Arron S. King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] v: 614.251.4515 f: 614.252.2650 -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? Exchange 5.5 SP4 I'm curious to find out what other Exchange Administrators see for the Private Info Store database size and what backup solutions that they are using? Ours largest Private DB is 70 Gig and we're using Dells PowerVault 110T and NT backup. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Re: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size?
We have in of our sites 100 people and 121GB IS (one VP has 2.53 Million emails with 2.1 M of them unread since 1999 and will not allow anyone to delete them), use DLT to backup. - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 9:59 AM Subject: RE: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? About 25gbs(200 users), Using Benchmark DLT1 backup device with native Microsoft Windows 2000 backup module (NTBackup). Raj -Original Message- From: King, Arron S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:50 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? Pete, We have about ~55 gb or so (Exchange 2k w/3 storage groups) Using Backup Exec and a Compaq TL890 Storage Library. === Arron S. King Network Systems Administrator Ohio Dominican University [EMAIL PROTECTED] v: 614.251.4515 f: 614.252.2650 -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 11:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Pole on largest PRIV.EDB size? Exchange 5.5 SP4 I'm curious to find out what other Exchange Administrators see for the Private Info Store database size and what backup solutions that they are using? Ours largest Private DB is 70 Gig and we're using Dells PowerVault 110T and NT backup. Pete Pfefferkorn Senior Systems Engineer/Mail Administrator University of Cincinnati 51 Goodman Street Cincinnati, OH 45221 Phone - (513) 556-9076 Fax - (513) 556-2042 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message.Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution, reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Folders
Hello All Is there a way to set in Exchange 5.5 to not see the public folders which are not set to replicate between different sites. We have three sites with a total of 2500 public folders (do not ask me why) but only 23 of them are set to replicate to each site. Is it possible not see the other 2477 public folders in Outlook? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: CDO.DLL
www.microsoft.com/downloads/release.asp?releaseID=29085 Q289606 . If this is for Exchange the above link is for 5.5 version 2000 version is on ex2000 resource kit. - Original Message - From: Reed, Alexander [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 11:31 AM Subject: CDO.DLL Does anyone know where I can get this new CDO.DLL? I was hoping there was a way without calling Microsoft! Thanks, Alex _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Titanium OWA screenshots
If you want a faster more responsive and easier on clients OWA then E2k3 is much superior to E2k2. Migrating from 5.5 to E2K3 is also much more smoother. If you are going to use any wireless PDA, Pocket PC etc then E2K3 is the answer. - Original Message - From: Clishe, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:03 PM Subject: RE: Titanium OWA screenshots Well, technically Titanium is version 6.5, so it's only a point upgrade to Exchange 2000 (version 6.0) Jason -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 2:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Titanium OWA screenshots The OS is Win2K Advanced Server SP3. To get the most features of Titanium one would need the .NET for OS. Although I think those features are not OWA-related. Exchange 2000 is much better than 5.5 in many ways, radically in some ways. Titanium is just a better version I am not finding it radically different from 2000. -Original Message- From: Doug Kassay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 1:59 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Titanium OWA screenshots As per normal in this group when posting I will brace myself for all the RTFM and/or www.google.com replies, but here goes anyway. We currently run 5.5 and OWA. We are looking at upgrading to Exchange 2000 and OWA in the very near future ( 3 months). I have never used exchang2K and OWA, but was very impressed with how awesome I found the titanium demo that Andrey hosted. (Thanks Andrey) Basically my question is: Is Titanium worth jumping from 5.5 and bypassing our plans for 2000? The follow up question is, which is mainly for Andrey: What is the OS that the demo is running on? Doug -Original Message- From: Gregory Householder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 1:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Titanium OWA screenshots Failed for me the first time too, but I ran it again and it worked just fine. Greg Householder [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Titanium OWA screenshots Spell checker failed for some reason. -Original Message- From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:41 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Titanium OWA screenshots if anyone wants to play with Titanium OWA - http://216.87.16.88/exchange logon as [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] with password 1234 -Original Message- From: Clishe, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 10:23 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Titanium OWA screenshots If anyone cares to see, I've posted some screenshots of the Titanium OWA here: http://www.clishe.com/titanium/titaniumowa.htm J a s o n C l i s h e Senior Network Engineer Analysts International, Sequoia Services Group Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Direct: (248) 371-3542 Mobile: (248) 891-8780 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MTA database error
It is interesting, I am having the same exact problem which started about 3 weeks ago. The MTA databases do not get deleted after a backup, I get the error he is getting. However if I stop and start the services the databases are then automatically deleted.. Mine is also behind a firewall, not multihomed and have no MTA logs on - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 7:54 AM Subject: Re: MTA database error Is this server multi-homed or behind a firewall? On 1/21/03 9:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Logging level is set to none. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MTA database error What level is the logging set to for the MTA on that server? On 1/21/03 8:52, Harris, Dot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm seeing this error on one of my Exchange 5.5 Servers - Exch 5.5 sp4. It started a week ago. I've run the mtacheck utility, checked for bad messages, didn't find any, and I still can't resolve this. Warning Event ID 105 An MTA database server error was encountered. [MTA XFER-IN 16 26] (14) Anyone have any suggestions on this one? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: MTA database error
yes there is. it communicates between two other exchange servers thru our Netscreen firewall VPN connection. However this error has only occured in the past three weeks and we have been communicating between the three servers for the past one year with no error. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 1:08 PM Subject: Re: MTA database error There's a firewall between this server and other Exchange servers it communicates with? On 1/21/03 14:41, M2web [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is interesting, I am having the same exact problem which started about 3 weeks ago. The MTA databases do not get deleted after a backup, I get the error he is getting. However if I stop and start the services the databases are then automatically deleted.. Mine is also behind a firewall, not multihomed and have no MTA logs on - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 7:54 AM Subject: Re: MTA database error Is this server multi-homed or behind a firewall? On 1/21/03 9:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Logging level is set to none. -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 9:04 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: MTA database error What level is the logging set to for the MTA on that server? On 1/21/03 8:52, Harris, Dot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm seeing this error on one of my Exchange 5.5 Servers - Exch 5.5 sp4. It started a week ago. I've run the mtacheck utility, checked for bad messages, didn't find any, and I still can't resolve this. Warning Event ID 105 An MTA database server error was encountered. [MTA XFER-IN 16 26] (14) Anyone have any suggestions on this one? Thanks. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Upgrading ADC
I have a test lab with Exch5.5 Sp4, Exch2000 SP3 on Win2k SP3. I am trying to install Exch 2003 on Win2K SP3 but I get an error that the ADC needs to be upgraded. Installation of ADC 2003 has only choices of Reinstall or Remove so I chose Reinstall however in the middle it stopped with an error that the User Name can not be found. Does anyone know why or what is the best path to upgrade the ADC. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange Cluster Question
Thank you for replying. I knew that but the problem is when one does either of the below: A. can not Create a profile in Outlook, as when the Check Name button is pressed it pops with a warning saying that the name could not be resolved in the address list B. trying to send an email from a box in Exchange 5.5 to that address using the full smtp address gets an undeliverable notification. I have checked the propeties of the account and can for example logon with it to the domain. But no boxes!? - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 5:15 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Cluster Question For Exchange2000, in Exchange System Manager the 'mailbox' will not show up until either the user logs into their 'mailbox' or an object is sent to the mailbox, like a new email. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of M2web Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions I have setup an A/A Exchange cluster with SP3 in parallel with an Exchange 5.5 SP4. I can move mailboxes from Exch5.5 to any of the other servers or vice versa. But When I create a new user with a mailbox, the mailbox is not created on any of the cluster servers. But when one looks at the property of the account under the exchange general tab it shows that the mailbox store is on one of the cluster servers. Does anyone have any idea why is this happening. I can of course create a mailbox on the Ex 5.5 server and the account does show up on the AD and mailbox is created fine! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange Cluster Question
You are absolutely correct and I apologize, I should have added those. No, the names do not appear in the GAL. I have checked ADC and if I create an account on Exch5.5 after synch it will show up in AD. There no event logs in system or application. As for changes The only change (and noted this) was to add an A/A exchange cluster to the existing exch5.5 and another E2K server within the same org and site. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:04 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Cluster Question And none of that information seemed relevant enough to include in the original post? You can't resolve the name using the Outlook client, does it appear in the GAL? On all machines? Error messages in the event log? Changes? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Thank you for replying. I knew that but the problem is when one does either of the below: A. can not Create a profile in Outlook, as when the Check Name button is pressed it pops with a warning saying that the name could not be resolved in the address list B. trying to send an email from a box in Exchange 5.5 to that address using the full smtp address gets an undeliverable notification. I have checked the propeties of the account and can for example logon with it to the domain. But no boxes!? - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 5:15 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Cluster Question For Exchange2000, in Exchange System Manager the 'mailbox' will not show up until either the user logs into their 'mailbox' or an object is sent to the mailbox, like a new email. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of M2web Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions I have setup an A/A Exchange cluster with SP3 in parallel with an Exchange 5.5 SP4. I can move mailboxes from Exch5.5 to any of the other servers or vice versa. But When I create a new user with a mailbox, the mailbox is not created on any of the cluster servers. But when one looks at the property of the account under the exchange general tab it shows that the mailbox store is on one of the cluster servers. Does anyone have any idea why is this happening. I can of course create a mailbox on the Ex 5.5 server and the account does show up on the AD and mailbox is created fine! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange Cluster Question
No, I do not. - Original Message - From: Callan, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 1:26 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Cluster Question Do you have an SRS Server. -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 3:52 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Cluster Question You are absolutely correct and I apologize, I should have added those. No, the names do not appear in the GAL. I have checked ADC and if I create an account on Exch5.5 after synch it will show up in AD. There no event logs in system or application. As for changes The only change (and noted this) was to add an A/A exchange cluster to the existing exch5.5 and another E2K server within the same org and site. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 12:04 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Cluster Question And none of that information seemed relevant enough to include in the original post? You can't resolve the name using the Outlook client, does it appear in the GAL? On all machines? Error messages in the event log? Changes? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 1:57 PM To: Exchange Discussions Thank you for replying. I knew that but the problem is when one does either of the below: A. can not Create a profile in Outlook, as when the Check Name button is pressed it pops with a warning saying that the name could not be resolved in the address list B. trying to send an email from a box in Exchange 5.5 to that address using the full smtp address gets an undeliverable notification. I have checked the propeties of the account and can for example logon with it to the domain. But no boxes!? - Original Message - From: William Lefkovics [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 5:15 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Cluster Question For Exchange2000, in Exchange System Manager the 'mailbox' will not show up until either the user logs into their 'mailbox' or an object is sent to the mailbox, like a new email. William -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of M2web Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 1:10 PM To: Exchange Discussions I have setup an A/A Exchange cluster with SP3 in parallel with an Exchange 5.5 SP4. I can move mailboxes from Exch5.5 to any of the other servers or vice versa. But When I create a new user with a mailbox, the mailbox is not created on any of the cluster servers. But when one looks at the property of the account under the exchange general tab it shows that the mailbox store is on one of the cluster servers. Does anyone have any idea why is this happening. I can of course create a mailbox on the Ex 5.5 server and the account does show up on the AD and mailbox is created fine! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange Cluster Question
I have setup an A/A Exchange cluster with SP3 in parallel with an Exchange 5.5 SP4. I can move mailboxes from Exch5.5 to any of the other servers or vice versa. But When I create a new user with a mailbox, the mailbox is not created on any of the cluster servers. But when one looks at the property of the account under the exchange general tab it shows that the mailbox store is on one of the cluster servers. Does anyone have any idea why is this happening. I can of course create a mailbox on the Ex 5.5 server and the account does show up on the AD and mailbox is created fine! _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MTA Growing
One of our offices is Win NT 4.0, Exchange 5.5 Sp4 Even though mail is flowing fine and everyone is getting/sending mail with no problem but there are 32000 items since yesterday in the MTA folder. I have tried to look up old discussion on MTA in this group but I have not been able to find the answer to this question. What is the safest way to delete these items? I did run a full backup this morning. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:leave-exchange;ls.swynk.com Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why move to E2K
I have been asked by our CTO to justify why we should go to E2K and spend $2.00 as result of the move on new real time mirroring software. I have gathered the usual MS stuff but would you have any compelling reason that I could also add or point me to other resources. Thanks the extra 20 grand comes as a result of Double Take (which unfortunately we already own) not supporting E2K like Exch 5.5 (if you look at their site they never mention this) and thus the need to go to NSI Geo Cluster (another crap, pardon my english) as our CTO wants an automatic failover just in case there is no one around. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange 2000 HA
Actually Double Take works for replication, however it is not High Availability Solution as the developer NSI or Sunbelt promote it on their site. But if you just want the data replicated then if you tweek it (and not according to their support way's soultion) , it does the job. Their other solution Geo Cluster is so damn expensive that we decided it is not worth it. - Original Message - From: Karen McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 9:28 AM Subject: Re: Exchange 2000 HA Missy, when you say doesn't do it nicely, does that imply that it does not work well/reliably as well as not being worth the cost? - Karen On Thu, 12 Sep 2002, Missy Koslosky wrote: There aren't any real best practices for this, as Exchange doesn't do it nicely. There are other possible solutions - Scharff? Missy - Original Message - From: Karen McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 12:01 PM Subject: Exchange 2000 HA I'm looking for best practices and white papers that discuss replicating Exchange 2000 clusters to a remote site. Management is concerned over how to do backups and what kind of software is out there that can provide this functionality. DoubleTake is not good enough, and that's the only product I am familiar with. Any pointers appreciated. TIA, Karen _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adding Exchange Admin
We have a one forest (corp.company.com), three child domain (site1.corp.company.com, site2... and site3...) AD setup. The account which the forestprep was run under is in the forest root. And Domainprep was run at each site using the administrator account of each site. We want to setup E2k in each child domain under one organization with three different sites coexisting with E5.5 which is already under one org and three different sites. I am trying to add from each sites an account which has been created for this pupose to the Enterprise Admin Group, however when I try to add these accounts from the forest root, I can only view accounts which are in the category of contact on the child domains and see no users what is wrong or is anything wrong? How can I allow each site to install E2K using an account created in each site? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Restoring Exchange 5.5 from Veritas online backup
Do not select the No Loss Restor. One other little known fact. Restore DS. Start DS. Stop DS. Restore Priv/Pub. Do not Run isinteg, Start Ds, Start others. - Original Message - From: Brian Dugas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 1:57 PM Subject: Restoring Exchange 5.5 from Veritas online backup Hello All - I want to restore exchange 5.5 to a test server. The server itself is identical to my live exchange server - 5.5, sp4, NT4.0 sp6a I installed exchange 5.5, sp4 on test server. I restored exchange from overnight backup tape(using Veritas backup exec w/exchange agent) I can start the Directory Services, but nothing else. I tried to run isinteg -patch but received error, missing logs. I also tried running isinteg -pri - test,message,folders but received error telling me to run isinteg - patch Any help? Brian _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: One more time OWA setup problems
I changed to basic authentication used several usersID and passwords but trying each 3 times I get access denied. Our SMTP proxy is corp.mydomain.com the IIS is in the domain ca.corp.mydomain.com I added the SMTP email [EMAIL PROTECTED] using the AD user and computer MMC. The recipient update service automatically adds [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Mark Rotman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 7:54 AM Subject: RE: One more time OWA setup problems Why don't you drop down to basic authentication rather than integrated. That way you can try to logon without the domain. This might help narrow the issue down. Also check that the recipient update service Let us know the results. Also, you say you added an SMTP email address as [EMAIL PROTECTED]. where did you do this? Why didn't the recipient update service handle this automatically? What is your default SMTP proxy? Mark Plus Pack for OWA SecureLogoff for OWA http://www.messageware.net -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 6:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: One more time OWA setup problems I asked this problem a couple of days ago but the answers did not help and I notice that there are others in this list and several other lists with the same exact problem but still no solution, so I am going to ask one more time having done all the solotions been suggested to my post or posts similar to it here and else-where: I have setup a test E2K server running with sp2 and all updates. The domain consists of one forest with three subdomains. The forest is called corp.int.mydomain.com. The subdomain which I have installed the E2K server is called ca.corp.int.mydomain.com . I have also installed IM and it works fine. However using IE6 to goto \\servername\exchange or \\IP address\exchange I get a popup to enter user name password and domain like OWA Exch 5.5. I checked M drive and and the first subdirectory shows corp.int.mydomain.com so I added an SMTP email address as [EMAIL PROTECTED] (alias and userids are all the same) I have used the following entries in the popup authentication box: username, password, ca.corp.int.mydomain.com username, password, corp.int.mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED], password [EMAIL PROTECTED], password, ca.corp.int.mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED], password, corp.int.mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED], password, pre-Win2k domain name but I can not get the webpage to come up. Any further help or points to any paper written on this (I did read Williams suggestion on Front and Backend servers) will be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: One more time OWA setup problems
Ok I created another virtual server called Exchangeca with a default corp.int.mydomain.com and then in IIS I created a virtual directory and pointed it to M:\corp.int.mydomain.com\MBX, used basic authentication with the domain name to be the pre-2000 domain name. Used userID, password but still get the same error. - Original Message - From: Jeffrey A. Beckham [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 11:28 AM Subject: RE: One more time OWA setup problems If you open exchange admin and for the server go under ProtocolsHTTPExchange Virtual Server and the properties of Exchange, you will notice which domain the virtual server is hosting mailboxes are for. If you want to change it to something else, create a new virtual server in here and set it up for the appropriate domain. Jeff -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Thursday, July 18, 2002 12:16 PM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: One more time OWA setup problems Subject: Re: One more time OWA setup problems I changed to basic authentication used several usersID and passwords but trying each 3 times I get access denied. Our SMTP proxy is corp.mydomain.com the IIS is in the domain ca.corp.mydomain.com I added the SMTP email [EMAIL PROTECTED] using the AD user and computer MMC. The recipient update service automatically adds [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Mark Rotman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 7:54 AM Subject: RE: One more time OWA setup problems Why don't you drop down to basic authentication rather than integrated. That way you can try to logon without the domain. This might help narrow the issue down. Also check that the recipient update service Let us know the results. Also, you say you added an SMTP email address as [EMAIL PROTECTED]. where did you do this? Why didn't the recipient update service handle this automatically? What is your default SMTP proxy? Mark Plus Pack for OWA SecureLogoff for OWA http://www.messageware.net -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 6:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: One more time OWA setup problems I asked this problem a couple of days ago but the answers did not help and I notice that there are others in this list and several other lists with the same exact problem but still no solution, so I am going to ask one more time having done all the solotions been suggested to my post or posts similar to it here and else-where: I have setup a test E2K server running with sp2 and all updates. The domain consists of one forest with three subdomains. The forest is called corp.int.mydomain.com. The subdomain which I have installed the E2K server is called ca.corp.int.mydomain.com . I have also installed IM and it works fine. However using IE6 to goto \\servername\exchange or \\IP address\exchange I get a popup to enter user name password and domain like OWA Exch 5.5. I checked M drive and and the first subdirectory shows corp.int.mydomain.com so I added an SMTP email address as [EMAIL PROTECTED] (alias and userids are all the same) I have used the following entries in the popup authentication box: username, password, ca.corp.int.mydomain.com username, password, corp.int.mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED], password [EMAIL PROTECTED], password, ca.corp.int.mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED], password, corp.int.mydomain.com [EMAIL PROTECTED], password, pre-Win2k domain name but I can not get the webpage to come up. Any further help or points to any paper written on this (I did read Williams suggestion on Front and Backend servers) will be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Forest Prep and Schema Object
I have one forest and one domain. I have run ForestPrep waited and then run DomainPrep, with no errors. However when I try to manually look at the below object cn=ms-Exch-Schema-Version-Pt, cn=schema, cn=configuration, dc= my domain to see that replication has occurred on any of the DCs including the one that I ran the DomainPrep on, I do not find the object, should I not see this object, would anyone point me to the problem. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain
Ok, I get Unable to relay for [EMAIL PROTECTED]. So where should I now be looking at? - Original Message - From: Baker, Jennifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 5:12 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Establish a telnet connection from the 5.5 server to the e2k server and have an smtp conversation. I believe that is what he meant. Use Q153119 if you need help. -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 4:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain if you mean by typing the smtp address in the Address field, the answer is NO! - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 3:41 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain If you send an SMTP message to the E2K server manually is it delivered? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 5:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Yes, it does in Exchange 5.5. And if I type the address in Outlook connected to E2k it resolves properly and even sends it out to the internet, but it can not recieve in the E2K connected box. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 3:18 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain If you type in that address and do an alt-k does it resolve properly and deliver? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Yes, it is. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:14 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Is the SMTP address below the one which appears on the mailbox objects in the directory when you're connected to an Outlook client on the EXCHANGE2 server? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 4:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Yes the SMTP address is configured as inbound in Exchange2 IMS. And yes it is the non-ability to receive internet email on the E2K box. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:41 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Is the SMTP address below the one which appears on the mailbox objects in the directory when you're connected to an Outlook client on the EXCHANGE2 server? And is that SMTP domain defined on the IMS as inbound? Yes the E2K can send/receive to each other and to Ex 5.5. They can also send messages out to the world. In the first post you said they couldn't send or receive... But it's actually just an ability to receive internet e-mail which routes through the existing Exchange 5.5 IMS correct? No error is logged in the Event Viewer for ADC . A sample copy of the NDR is below: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 5/31/2002 11:35 AM The e-mail address could not be found. Perhaps the recipient moved to a different e-mail organization, or there was a mistake in the address. Check the address and try again.The MTS-ID of the original message is:c=us;a= ;p=domain;l=EXCHANGE20205311834LQXMZZ2G MSEXCH:IMS:domain:NZDOM:EXCHANGE2 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient The mail boxes which were moved to E2K can be see within the recepient container of Exchange 5.5 (original container in which they were created) The recipient container for the site? That would be expected since they are sill in the site. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:57 AM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain I moved a few boxes from 5.5 to E2K, however even though all the boxes within 5.5 can
E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain
I have installed and setup E2K, SP2 within the same domain as our existing Exch 5.5, SP6. I can successfuly move mail boxes from 5.5 to E2K. Internal messages from boxes within 5.5 are properly sent to boxes within E2K. However, any messages coming from outside do not get to any of the boxes in E2K. Our firewall is setup to route SMTP to the Exch 5.5 box. But having read Bill English'e book and looked at MS stuff, I am under the impression that 5.5 is suppose to send the emails thru AD to E2K box. Is there something fundamental that I am missing? How would I go about solving this problem? And by the way why do I still see in 5.5 the mail boxes which were moved to E2K? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain
I moved a few boxes from 5.5 to E2K, however even though all the boxes within 5.5 can send/receive emails from outside none of the boxes in E2K can send/receive any email from outside. Using the Exchange 5.5 Admin, I also see the boxes which I moved from 5.5 to E2K within the 5.5 container, is this the way it should be? - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:32 AM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Exchange 5.5 sees the E2K server as just another Exchange server, it sends to it the same way it would send to another 5.5 server in the site. What problem do you have that you are trying to solve? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain I have installed and setup E2K, SP2 within the same domain as our existing Exch 5.5, SP6. I can successfuly move mail boxes from 5.5 to E2K. Internal messages from boxes within 5.5 are properly sent to boxes within E2K. However, any messages coming from outside do not get to any of the boxes in E2K. Our firewall is setup to route SMTP to the Exch 5.5 box. But having read Bill English'e book and looked at MS stuff, I am under the impression that 5.5 is suppose to send the emails thru AD to E2K box. Is there something fundamental that I am missing? How would I go about solving this problem? And by the way why do I still see in 5.5 the mail boxes which were moved to E2K? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain
Yes the SMTP address is configured as inbound in Exchange2 IMS. And yes it is the non-ability to receive internet email on the E2K box. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:41 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Is the SMTP address below the one which appears on the mailbox objects in the directory when you're connected to an Outlook client on the EXCHANGE2 server? And is that SMTP domain defined on the IMS as inbound? Yes the E2K can send/receive to each other and to Ex 5.5. They can also send messages out to the world. In the first post you said they couldn't send or receive... But it's actually just an ability to receive internet e-mail which routes through the existing Exchange 5.5 IMS correct? No error is logged in the Event Viewer for ADC . A sample copy of the NDR is below: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 5/31/2002 11:35 AM The e-mail address could not be found. Perhaps the recipient moved to a different e-mail organization, or there was a mistake in the address. Check the address and try again.The MTS-ID of the original message is:c=us;a= ;p=domain;l=EXCHANGE20205311834LQXMZZ2G MSEXCH:IMS:domain:NZDOM:EXCHANGE2 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient The mail boxes which were moved to E2K can be see within the recepient container of Exchange 5.5 (original container in which they were created) The recipient container for the site? That would be expected since they are sill in the site. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:57 AM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain I moved a few boxes from 5.5 to E2K, however even though all the boxes within 5.5 can send/receive emails from outside none of the boxes in E2K can send/receive any email from outside. Can the E2K users send/ receive mail to the each other? Can the send/ receive mail from the Exchange 5.5 users? What do the NDRs look like? Is directory replication occurring? Are there any errors with the ADC? Using the Exchange 5.5 Admin, I also see the boxes which I moved from 5.5 to E2K within the 5.5 container, is this the way it should be? You can see the mailboxes within what container? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain
Yes, it is. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:14 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Is the SMTP address below the one which appears on the mailbox objects in the directory when you're connected to an Outlook client on the EXCHANGE2 server? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 4:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Yes the SMTP address is configured as inbound in Exchange2 IMS. And yes it is the non-ability to receive internet email on the E2K box. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:41 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Is the SMTP address below the one which appears on the mailbox objects in the directory when you're connected to an Outlook client on the EXCHANGE2 server? And is that SMTP domain defined on the IMS as inbound? Yes the E2K can send/receive to each other and to Ex 5.5. They can also send messages out to the world. In the first post you said they couldn't send or receive... But it's actually just an ability to receive internet e-mail which routes through the existing Exchange 5.5 IMS correct? No error is logged in the Event Viewer for ADC . A sample copy of the NDR is below: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 5/31/2002 11:35 AM The e-mail address could not be found. Perhaps the recipient moved to a different e-mail organization, or there was a mistake in the address. Check the address and try again.The MTS-ID of the original message is:c=us;a= ;p=domain;l=EXCHANGE20205311834LQXMZZ2G MSEXCH:IMS:domain:NZDOM:EXCHANGE2 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient The mail boxes which were moved to E2K can be see within the recepient container of Exchange 5.5 (original container in which they were created) The recipient container for the site? That would be expected since they are sill in the site. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:57 AM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain I moved a few boxes from 5.5 to E2K, however even though all the boxes within 5.5 can send/receive emails from outside none of the boxes in E2K can send/receive any email from outside. Can the E2K users send/ receive mail to the each other? Can the send/ receive mail from the Exchange 5.5 users? What do the NDRs look like? Is directory replication occurring? Are there any errors with the ADC? Using the Exchange 5.5 Admin, I also see the boxes which I moved from 5.5 to E2K within the 5.5 container, is this the way it should be? You can see the mailboxes within what container? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain
Yes, it does in Exchange 5.5. And if I type the address in Outlook connected to E2k it resolves properly and even sends it out to the internet, but it can not recieve in the E2K connected box. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 3:18 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain If you type in that address and do an alt-k does it resolve properly and deliver? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Yes, it is. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:14 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Is the SMTP address below the one which appears on the mailbox objects in the directory when you're connected to an Outlook client on the EXCHANGE2 server? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 4:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Yes the SMTP address is configured as inbound in Exchange2 IMS. And yes it is the non-ability to receive internet email on the E2K box. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:41 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Is the SMTP address below the one which appears on the mailbox objects in the directory when you're connected to an Outlook client on the EXCHANGE2 server? And is that SMTP domain defined on the IMS as inbound? Yes the E2K can send/receive to each other and to Ex 5.5. They can also send messages out to the world. In the first post you said they couldn't send or receive... But it's actually just an ability to receive internet e-mail which routes through the existing Exchange 5.5 IMS correct? No error is logged in the Event Viewer for ADC . A sample copy of the NDR is below: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 5/31/2002 11:35 AM The e-mail address could not be found. Perhaps the recipient moved to a different e-mail organization, or there was a mistake in the address. Check the address and try again.The MTS-ID of the original message is:c=us;a= ;p=domain;l=EXCHANGE20205311834LQXMZZ2G MSEXCH:IMS:domain:NZDOM:EXCHANGE2 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient The mail boxes which were moved to E2K can be see within the recepient container of Exchange 5.5 (original container in which they were created) The recipient container for the site? That would be expected since they are sill in the site. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:57 AM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain I moved a few boxes from 5.5 to E2K, however even though all the boxes within 5.5 can send/receive emails from outside none of the boxes in E2K can send/receive any email from outside. Can the E2K users send/ receive mail to the each other? Can the send/ receive mail from the Exchange 5.5 users? What do the NDRs look like? Is directory replication occurring? Are there any errors with the ADC? Using the Exchange 5.5 Admin, I also see the boxes which I moved from 5.5 to E2K within the 5.5 container, is this the way it should be? You can see the mailboxes within what container? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin
Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain
if you mean by typing the smtp address in the Address field, the answer is NO! - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 3:41 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain If you send an SMTP message to the E2K server manually is it delivered? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 5:39 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Yes, it does in Exchange 5.5. And if I type the address in Outlook connected to E2k it resolves properly and even sends it out to the internet, but it can not recieve in the E2K connected box. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 3:18 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain If you type in that address and do an alt-k does it resolve properly and deliver? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 5:18 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Yes, it is. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 2:14 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Is the SMTP address below the one which appears on the mailbox objects in the directory when you're connected to an Outlook client on the EXCHANGE2 server? -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 4:08 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Yes the SMTP address is configured as inbound in Exchange2 IMS. And yes it is the non-ability to receive internet email on the E2K box. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 12:41 PM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain Is the SMTP address below the one which appears on the mailbox objects in the directory when you're connected to an Outlook client on the EXCHANGE2 server? And is that SMTP domain defined on the IMS as inbound? Yes the E2K can send/receive to each other and to Ex 5.5. They can also send messages out to the world. In the first post you said they couldn't send or receive... But it's actually just an ability to receive internet e-mail which routes through the existing Exchange 5.5 IMS correct? No error is logged in the Event Viewer for ADC . A sample copy of the NDR is below: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' on 5/31/2002 11:35 AM The e-mail address could not be found. Perhaps the recipient moved to a different e-mail organization, or there was a mistake in the address. Check the address and try again.The MTS-ID of the original message is:c=us;a= ;p=domain;l=EXCHANGE20205311834LQXMZZ2G MSEXCH:IMS:domain:NZDOM:EXCHANGE2 0 (000C05A6) Unknown Recipient The mail boxes which were moved to E2K can be see within the recepient container of Exchange 5.5 (original container in which they were created) The recipient container for the site? That would be expected since they are sill in the site. - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:57 AM Subject: RE: E2K and Exchange 5.5 in the same domain I moved a few boxes from 5.5 to E2K, however even though all the boxes within 5.5 can send/receive emails from outside none of the boxes in E2K can send/receive any email from outside. Can the E2K users send/ receive mail to the each other? Can the send/ receive mail from the Exchange 5.5 users? What do the NDRs look like? Is directory replication occurring? Are there any errors with the ADC? Using the Exchange 5.5 Admin, I also see the boxes which I moved from 5.5 to E2K within the 5.5 container, is this the way it should be? You can see the mailboxes within what container? _ List
installing OWA 5.5 on Win2K
we have an office which has Ex5.5, SP4 on a WinNT4.0 SP6a and a separate box which has the OWA. Does anyone see a problem upgrading the OS on the OWA box which at this moment is WinNT 4.0 to Win2K with IIS 5.0? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange Migration woes...
I had the same problem. You must install E2K as the account which you provided when you were doing forestprep. Once I did that then evrything worked. Also remeber to add that account to have service admin rights in 5.5 - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:33 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Throw me a bone here, will ya'? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... If you still can't see the Exchange 5.5 servers in the ESM or verse vice, that could go a long way toward explaining why there's no option to move them. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Migration woes... Hi All, I am having a problem with ADC connection agreement, I think, here. There is no option to move mailbox under exchange tasks for users after initial replication, after creating a connection agreement. Here is my situation: -1 NT domain and 1 Win 2k domain (2 win2k sp2 server- dc) -performed Netdiag-on DC and member server -performed dcdiag- on DC and member server -Installed ADC on DC (also global catalog server) -Forestprep - on DC -Domainprep - on DC -Setup ADC with one way connection agreement(did not allow two way agreement-due to 2 domains?) -install E2k Sp2 on member server, applied available hot fix. - install ESM on DC ( technet suggested to install ESM on the machine from where you are trying to move mailbox) I did not use ADMT because the users were already created manually by my Network Admin. earlier (not inside the users container but created another container on the same level as users). Therefore I pointed to the same container in the connection agreement also(CA properties--from exchange). The only available tasks are Delete Email addresses and enable IM in Exchange task wizard. Is it necessary to use ADMT ? What am I missing here? Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation.** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation. ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange Migration woes...
The exact same error was what I had. I removed the E2K installation. Removed any ADC connector, and recreated it and allowed it to synch. Then re-installed E2K with the account which had the right to install E2K and aslo gave that account the service admin rights at all levels in 5.5. - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:16 AM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... I installed E2k and did Forestprep as Administrator(Win2k) who has all the required rights(this is a small shop). Administrator(win2k) is also a member of the Exchange Admin group in NT. Some more stuff I discovered: -I can telnet to the LDAP port 389 of Exchange 5.5 from the DC (win2k domain) -error message in CA while creating a 2 way agreement: Unable to create intra-organizational CA using specified exchange 5.5 server.error # c103aa39 -Distribution lists are replicated as mail enabled contacts and not mail enabled groups I will closely scrutinize the Admin rights again to see if there is anything missing. Thanks for all your help. -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... I had the same problem. You must install E2K as the account which you provided when you were doing forestprep. Once I did that then evrything worked. Also remeber to add that account to have service admin rights in 5.5 - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:33 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Throw me a bone here, will ya'? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... If you still can't see the Exchange 5.5 servers in the ESM or verse vice, that could go a long way toward explaining why there's no option to move them. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Migration woes... Hi All, I am having a problem with ADC connection agreement, I think, here. There is no option to move mailbox under exchange tasks for users after initial replication, after creating a connection agreement. Here is my situation: -1 NT domain and 1 Win 2k domain (2 win2k sp2 server- dc) -performed Netdiag-on DC and member server -performed dcdiag- on DC and member server -Installed ADC on DC (also global catalog server) -Forestprep - on DC -Domainprep - on DC -Setup ADC with one way connection agreement(did not allow two way agreement-due to 2 domains?) -install E2k Sp2 on member server, applied available hot fix. - install ESM on DC ( technet suggested to install ESM on the machine from where you are trying to move mailbox) I did not use ADMT because the users were already created manually by my Network Admin. earlier (not inside the users container but created another container on the same level as users). Therefore I pointed to the same container in the connection agreement also(CA properties--from exchange). The only available tasks are Delete Email addresses and enable IM in Exchange task wizard. Is it necessary to use ADMT ? What am I missing here? Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation.** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
Re: Exchange Migration woes...
Do you have a problem? It seems each time I post something you come up with a wise a.se comment! - Original Message - From: Chris Scharff [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 10:40 AM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Is that the case? -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Throw me a bone here, will ya'? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... If you still can't see the Exchange 5.5 servers in the ESM or verse vice, that could go a long way toward explaining why there's no option to move them. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Migration woes... Hi All, I am having a problem with ADC connection agreement, I think, here. There is no option to move mailbox under exchange tasks for users after initial replication, after creating a connection agreement. Here is my situation: -1 NT domain and 1 Win 2k domain (2 win2k sp2 server- dc) -performed Netdiag-on DC and member server -performed dcdiag- on DC and member server -Installed ADC on DC (also global catalog server) -Forestprep - on DC -Domainprep - on DC -Setup ADC with one way connection agreement(did not allow two way agreement-due to 2 domains?) -install E2k Sp2 on member server, applied available hot fix. - install ESM on DC ( technet suggested to install ESM on the machine from where you are trying to move mailbox) I did not use ADMT because the users were already created manually by my Network Admin. earlier (not inside the users container but created another container on the same level as users). Therefore I pointed to the same container in the connection agreement also(CA properties--from exchange). The only available tasks are Delete Email addresses and enable IM in Exchange task wizard. Is it necessary to use ADMT ? What am I missing here? Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation.** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message or the information contained in this message or the taking of any action in reliance on it is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you for your cooperation.** ** ** _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Re: Exchange Migration woes...
uninstall e2k remove the CA in ADC and recreate (do not need to remove ADC) synch install e2k - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:33 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Are you suggesting: - - I uninstall exchange 2k manually. - Remove ADC - Re install ADC, create CA and sych. -install E2k etc... -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 2:20 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... The exact same error was what I had. I removed the E2K installation. Removed any ADC connector, and recreated it and allowed it to synch. Then re-installed E2K with the account which had the right to install E2K and aslo gave that account the service admin rights at all levels in 5.5. - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 11:16 AM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... I installed E2k and did Forestprep as Administrator(Win2k) who has all the required rights(this is a small shop). Administrator(win2k) is also a member of the Exchange Admin group in NT. Some more stuff I discovered: -I can telnet to the LDAP port 389 of Exchange 5.5 from the DC (win2k domain) -error message in CA while creating a 2 way agreement: Unable to create intra-organizational CA using specified exchange 5.5 server.error # c103aa39 -Distribution lists are replicated as mail enabled contacts and not mail enabled groups I will closely scrutinize the Admin rights again to see if there is anything missing. Thanks for all your help. -Original Message- From: M2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:34 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Exchange Migration woes... I had the same problem. You must install E2K as the account which you provided when you were doing forestprep. Once I did that then evrything worked. Also remeber to add that account to have service admin rights in 5.5 - Original Message - From: Pillai, Raj [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:33 PM Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... Throw me a bone here, will ya'? -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 5:28 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange Migration woes... If you still can't see the Exchange 5.5 servers in the ESM or verse vice, that could go a long way toward explaining why there's no option to move them. -Original Message- From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange Migration woes... Hi All, I am having a problem with ADC connection agreement, I think, here. There is no option to move mailbox under exchange tasks for users after initial replication, after creating a connection agreement. Here is my situation: -1 NT domain and 1 Win 2k domain (2 win2k sp2 server- dc) -performed Netdiag-on DC and member server -performed dcdiag- on DC and member server -Installed ADC on DC (also global catalog server) -Forestprep - on DC -Domainprep - on DC -Setup ADC with one way connection agreement(did not allow two way agreement-due to 2 domains?) -install E2k Sp2 on member server, applied available hot fix. - install ESM on DC ( technet suggested to install ESM on the machine from where you are trying to move mailbox) I did not use ADMT because the users were already created manually by my Network Admin. earlier (not inside the users container but created another container on the same level as users). Therefore I pointed to the same container in the connection agreement also(CA properties--from exchange). The only available tasks are Delete Email addresses and enable IM in Exchange task wizard. Is it necessary to use ADMT ? What am I missing here? Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks ** ** **This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, may be protected by the attorney/client or other applicable privileges, and may constitute non-public information. This message is intended to be conveyed only to the designated recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, do not read it; please immediately notify the sender that you have received this message in error and delete this message. Unauthorized use, disclosure, dissemination, distribution or reproduction
Re: Spam Filter Suggestions
Mailmarshal at MarshalSoftware.com. Have been using it for 2 years. Works great! - Original Message - From: Louanne Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2002 12:48 PM Subject: Spam Filter Suggestions Does anyone have recommendations on good spam filtering software? We are currently using ScanMail and are looking at their Emanager product but I wanted to know if there are other products we should look at. Thanks! Louanne [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Trouble changing LDAP Port
I am trying to change the LDAP port from 389 to 390. However I get a message which says: The directory is busy, wait a few minutes and try again. Microsoft Exchange Directory ID no: DS_ E_ BUSY I have stopped and started services but I still get the above error. Does Anyone have any idea? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange as WINS
We have a network admin in one of our sister companies that has made his Exchange server which happens to be in the same org as ours with site replications, to be also a WINS server. Our mutual supervisor does not listen to my arguments against having Exchange to be a WINS server too. Would anyone have pro and conns for this. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Exchange as WINS
He is totally against MS Products, specially Exchange, so much so that he even creates DLs only on a Unix box and then Unix box sends it to individual members (yes, his Priv is 45GB for 125 people in two months). Exchange was made the standard platform because of all the things that it can offer versus SendMail which they used before they were bought by us. He wants to have as few NT servers as possible, thus WINS on Exchange. He just informed me that he has the secondary WINS on Exchange to be one of the WINS server at our location (West Coast, they are in East Coast) and would not listen to me that he should have the Primary and Secondary on a WINS server to be itself for reasons like database fragmentation and which server really own the database etc... Thanks for everyone who replied. I have sent to them to our CTO. - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 2:16 PM Subject: RE: Exchange as WINS Not to mention if the Exchange server is down, so it WINS -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 2:11 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange as WINS Exchange does not like to play alongside others, and he will demonstrate his displeasure at the most inopportune time (whatever that may be for your business). You can run WINS off of an old moldy workstation - what is his really good reason for doing this? -Original Message- From: m2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 3:35 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Exchange as WINS We have a network admin in one of our sister companies that has made his Exchange server which happens to be in the same org as ours with site replications, to be also a WINS server. Our mutual supervisor does not listen to my arguments against having Exchange to be a WINS server too. Would anyone have pro and conns for this. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Procmail
Would anyone know or used Procmail to do mail filtering for viruses, subjects, addresses etc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Procmail
here is more info http://www.ii.com/internet/robots/procmail/qs/ - Original Message - From: Martin Blackstone [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:22 PM Subject: RE: Procmail Used what? What is that? -Original Message- From: m2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001 1:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Procmail Would anyone know or used Procmail to do mail filtering for viruses, subjects, addresses etc. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fw: Email Scanners
For your money go with MailMarshal. Compares to Sybari and a lot cheaper www.marshalsoftware.com - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:37 PM Subject: RE: Email Scanners It's not the sig. It's the (gasp) Notes Client :( ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Doug Hampshire | || doug.hampshire@peregrine| || .com| || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 12/06/2001 06:22 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- --- | | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: RE: Email Scanners | --- | And we're all partial to Kelly, except that damn ugly sig that she uses. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Email Scanners The FAQ lists Trend... but I happen to be partial to Antigen from Sybari Software :) ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Network Issues | || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || om | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 12/06/2001 06:14 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- -- - | | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Email Scanners | -- - | I have been tasked to find an email scanner for our enterprise. I was wondering which one of the many products available do you recommend? Your advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To
Fw: Email Scanners
Same with MailMarshal and we scan on average 35000 emails daily. - Original Message - From: Anthony L. Sollars [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:36 PM Subject: RE: Email Scanners WE use Sybari Antigen and Absolutely love it, had never failed and requires almost zero administration once in place. Can't say a virus attachment has gotten through our security system since we put it in. -TOny -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Scanners Content management with Antigen is in their beta product... contact me offline for more info (no one else will complain about my mail client that way) ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Network Issues | || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || om | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 12/06/2001 06:27 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- --- | | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: RE: Email Scanners | --- | Sorry... We are running Exchange 5.5 / SP4 and the guys upstairs want to be able to block attachments, scan for viruses and scan the content of the email for what management deems inappropriate. Thanks again. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Scanners And we're all partial to Kelly, except that damn ugly sig that she uses. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Email Scanners The FAQ lists Trend... but I happen to be partial to Antigen from Sybari Software :) ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Network Issues | || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || om | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 12/06/2001 06:14 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- -- - | | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Email Scanners | -- - | I have been tasked to find an email scanner for our enterprise. I was wondering which one of the many products available do you recommend? Your advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To
Re: Email Scanners
For your money go with MailMarshal. Compares to Sybari and a lot cheaper www.marshalsoftware.com - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:37 PM Subject: RE: Email Scanners It's not the sig. It's the (gasp) Notes Client :( ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Doug Hampshire | || doug.hampshire@peregrine| || .com| || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 12/06/2001 06:22 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- --- | | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: RE: Email Scanners | --- | And we're all partial to Kelly, except that damn ugly sig that she uses. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Email Scanners The FAQ lists Trend... but I happen to be partial to Antigen from Sybari Software :) ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Network Issues | || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || om | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 12/06/2001 06:14 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- -- - | | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Email Scanners | -- - | I have been tasked to find an email scanner for our enterprise. I was wondering which one of the many products available do you recommend? Your advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Email Scanners
Same with MailMarshal and we scan on average 35000 emails daily. - Original Message - From: Anthony L. Sollars [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:36 PM Subject: RE: Email Scanners WE use Sybari Antigen and Absolutely love it, had never failed and requires almost zero administration once in place. Can't say a virus attachment has gotten through our security system since we put it in. -TOny -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:38 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Scanners Content management with Antigen is in their beta product... contact me offline for more info (no one else will complain about my mail client that way) ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Network Issues | || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || om | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 12/06/2001 06:27 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- --- | | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: RE: Email Scanners | --- | Sorry... We are running Exchange 5.5 / SP4 and the guys upstairs want to be able to block attachments, scan for viruses and scan the content of the email for what management deems inappropriate. Thanks again. -Original Message- From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:23 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Email Scanners And we're all partial to Kelly, except that damn ugly sig that she uses. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Email Scanners The FAQ lists Trend... but I happen to be partial to Antigen from Sybari Software :) ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Network Issues | || [EMAIL PROTECTED]| || om | || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 12/06/2001 06:14 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- -- - | | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: Email Scanners | -- - | I have been tasked to find an email scanner for our enterprise. I was wondering which one of the many products available do you recommend? Your advice is greatly appreciated. Thanks. Ron _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List
Re: Email Scanners
If you wish it too. My mistake! - Original Message - From: Lefkovics, William [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 4:39 PM Subject: RE: Email Scanners Does it duplicate emails, too? -Original Message- From: m2web [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 4:31 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Fw: Email Scanners For your money go with MailMarshal. Compares to Sybari and a lot cheaper www.marshalsoftware.com - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:37 PM Subject: RE: Email Scanners It's not the sig. It's the (gasp) Notes Client :( ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor |+--- || Doug Hampshire | || doug.hampshire@peregrine| || .com| || Sent by: | || bounce-exchange-148870@ls| || .swynk.com | || | || | || 12/06/2001 06:22 PM | || Please respond to| || Exchange Discussions | || | |+--- --- | | | | To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | cc: | | Subject: RE: Email Scanners | --- | And we're all partial to Kelly, except that damn ugly sig that she uses. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 3:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Email Scanners The FAQ lists Trend... but I happen to be partial to Antigen from Sybari Software :) ~ -K.Borndale Network Administrator Sybari Software 631.630.8569 -direct dial 631.439.0689 -fax http://www.sybari.com One man's ceiling is another man's floor _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free/Busy Schedule not working
We have three site that are connected together thru site connectors. We have also setup free/busy connectors at system folders. I am able to see the free/busy schedules of other sites but they are not able to see ours. I have looked at the properties of the connector and in the Replica tab I see us and other sites listed, however on the Folder Replication Status there is nothing. I have changed the Replication Schedule from Always to Selected times, and vice versa but still nothing works. On the other two sites the MS Mail Connector and CC mail do not exist. On our site they do however we do not use them but then in our case in the Server Recepients we have Microsoft Schedule+Free/Bust Connector which does not exists in the other two sites. Could having the MS Mail and CC mail be the problem and having not configured the Microsoft Schedule+Free/Bust Connector ? Or is there something else wrong? All Exchange 5.5, SP4 _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
