RE: OOF replies to the Internet

2002-03-06 Thread Hunter, Lori

Should not and will not are two completely different fish, aren't they?
I've not seen it, but I've heard the tales.  It can happen.

-Original Message-
From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 5:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet


Out of office assistant should not cause any mail loops, since it will
only fire up once per unique email address.  

Andrew,
MCSE (NT  W2K) + CCNA
 

-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:44 PM
Posted To: DiscussionGroup
Conversation: OOF replies to the Internet
Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet


create a distribution list and a public folder
set the email address for the public folder to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
add the public folder as a member of the distribution list.
go to the permissions tab of the public folder properties in Outlook.
Give the folder default permissions  contributor (Exchange 2000 set
anonymous to
contributor)

Go to the properties of the public folder in outlook and click on stuff
until you find the folder assistant. Add rule. In the to: field, select
the distribution list created in the beginning. Select reply with
template and type in the reply text and subject  save and close. click
ok.. Blah, blah. Be sure to note in the body of the reply that This is
an autoresponse.  Please do not respond to this message.

click add rule, select delete, say ok to this rule will fire for all
incoming messages...

(make sure that the reply rule is noted before the delete rule.)

-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet


What is *correctly*?  I'm getting a request from someone for an
auto-reply and I'd like to know if it's possible to do without a
problem.

-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet


Automatic replies that are setup *correctly* will NOT cause mail
loops... Allowing OOFS to the internet:

Tom Meunier
I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address.  Please
put me on your A list for resale to other spammers.

I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy.  Since I've
just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax
assessor's web site and look up the location of my residence.  Help
yourself.

Hello customer.  I'm not in, and you can try contacting someone else in
my firm who wants your business.  The bonus is, however, all on you, as
I'm too lazy to delegate my email to somebody else while away.  Please
don't go visit our competitor, who is far too professional to send you
an ascii answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier

-Original Message-
From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OOF replies to the Internet


Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading
some of the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a
problem with allowing OOFs to the Internet.  How does this work to avoid
mail loops? ...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way
it works internally?

Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet issue remains
the
same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD.   True?

Thanks!

Rob Sargent

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: OOF replies to the Internet

2002-03-05 Thread Whitlock, Teresa

What is *correctly*?  I'm getting a request from someone for an auto-reply
and I'd like to know if it's possible to do without a problem.

-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet


Automatic replies that are setup *correctly* will NOT cause mail loops...
Allowing OOFS to the internet:

Tom Meunier
I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address.  Please put
me on your A list for resale to other spammers.

I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy.  Since I've just
told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax assessor's web
site and look up the location of my residence.  Help yourself.

Hello customer.  I'm not in, and you can try contacting someone else in my
firm who wants your business.  The bonus is, however, all on you, as I'm too
lazy to delegate my email to somebody else while away.  Please don't go
visit our competitor, who is far too professional to send you an ascii
answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier

-Original Message-
From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OOF replies to the Internet


Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading some of
the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a problem with
allowing OOFs to the Internet.  How does this work to avoid mail loops?
...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way it works
internally?

Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet issue remains the
same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD.   True?

Thanks!

Rob Sargent

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OOF replies to the Internet

2002-03-05 Thread Jennifer Baker

create a distribution list and a public folder
set the email address for the public folder to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
add the public folder as a member of the distribution list.
go to the permissions tab of the public folder properties in Outlook.  Give
the folder default permissions  contributor (Exchange 2000 set anonymous to
contributor)

Go to the properties of the public folder in outlook and click on stuff
until you find the folder assistant.
Add rule.
In the to: field, select the distribution list created in the beginning.
Select reply with template and type in the reply text and subject  save and
close. click ok.. Blah, blah. Be sure to note in the body of the reply that
This is an
autoresponse.  Please do not respond to this message.

click add rule, select delete, say ok to this rule will fire for all
incoming messages...

(make sure that the reply rule is noted before the delete rule.)

-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet


What is *correctly*?  I'm getting a request from someone for an auto-reply
and I'd like to know if it's possible to do without a problem.

-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet


Automatic replies that are setup *correctly* will NOT cause mail loops...
Allowing OOFS to the internet:

Tom Meunier
I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address.  Please put
me on your A list for resale to other spammers.

I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy.  Since I've just
told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax assessor's web
site and look up the location of my residence.  Help yourself.

Hello customer.  I'm not in, and you can try contacting someone else in my
firm who wants your business.  The bonus is, however, all on you, as I'm too
lazy to delegate my email to somebody else while away.  Please don't go
visit our competitor, who is far too professional to send you an ascii
answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier

-Original Message-
From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OOF replies to the Internet


Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading some of
the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a problem with
allowing OOFs to the Internet.  How does this work to avoid mail loops?
...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way it works
internally?

Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet issue remains the
same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD.   True?

Thanks!

Rob Sargent

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OOF replies to the Internet

2002-03-05 Thread Andrew Chan

Out of office assistant should not cause any mail loops, since it will
only fire up once per unique email address.  

Andrew,
MCSE (NT  W2K) + CCNA
 

-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:44 PM
Posted To: DiscussionGroup
Conversation: OOF replies to the Internet
Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet


create a distribution list and a public folder
set the email address for the public folder to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
add the public folder as a member of the distribution list.
go to the permissions tab of the public folder properties in Outlook.
Give the folder default permissions  contributor (Exchange 2000 set
anonymous to
contributor)

Go to the properties of the public folder in outlook and click on stuff
until you find the folder assistant. Add rule. In the to: field, select
the distribution list created in the beginning. Select reply with
template and type in the reply text and subject  save and close. click
ok.. Blah, blah. Be sure to note in the body of the reply that This is
an autoresponse.  Please do not respond to this message.

click add rule, select delete, say ok to this rule will fire for all
incoming messages...

(make sure that the reply rule is noted before the delete rule.)

-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet


What is *correctly*?  I'm getting a request from someone for an
auto-reply and I'd like to know if it's possible to do without a
problem.

-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet


Automatic replies that are setup *correctly* will NOT cause mail
loops... Allowing OOFS to the internet:

Tom Meunier
I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address.  Please
put me on your A list for resale to other spammers.

I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy.  Since I've
just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax
assessor's web site and look up the location of my residence.  Help
yourself.

Hello customer.  I'm not in, and you can try contacting someone else in
my firm who wants your business.  The bonus is, however, all on you, as
I'm too lazy to delegate my email to somebody else while away.  Please
don't go visit our competitor, who is far too professional to send you
an ascii answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier

-Original Message-
From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OOF replies to the Internet


Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading
some of the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a
problem with allowing OOFs to the Internet.  How does this work to avoid
mail loops? ...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way
it works internally?

Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet issue remains
the
same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD.   True?

Thanks!

Rob Sargent

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OOF replies to the Internet

2002-03-05 Thread Jennifer Baker

Err.. yes..that's a good idea.

Out of Office Reply: Thank you for contacting Fluke Networks!

-Original Message-
From: Andrew Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 3:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet


Out of office assistant should not cause any mail loops, since it will
only fire up once per unique email address.  

Andrew,
MCSE (NT  W2K) + CCNA
 

-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:44 PM
Posted To: DiscussionGroup
Conversation: OOF replies to the Internet
Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet


create a distribution list and a public folder
set the email address for the public folder to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
add the public folder as a member of the distribution list.
go to the permissions tab of the public folder properties in Outlook.
Give the folder default permissions  contributor (Exchange 2000 set
anonymous to
contributor)

Go to the properties of the public folder in outlook and click on stuff
until you find the folder assistant. Add rule. In the to: field, select
the distribution list created in the beginning. Select reply with
template and type in the reply text and subject  save and close. click
ok.. Blah, blah. Be sure to note in the body of the reply that This is
an autoresponse.  Please do not respond to this message.

click add rule, select delete, say ok to this rule will fire for all
incoming messages...

(make sure that the reply rule is noted before the delete rule.)

-Original Message-
From: Whitlock, Teresa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2002 2:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet


What is *correctly*?  I'm getting a request from someone for an
auto-reply and I'd like to know if it's possible to do without a
problem.

-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet


Automatic replies that are setup *correctly* will NOT cause mail
loops... Allowing OOFS to the internet:

Tom Meunier
I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address.  Please
put me on your A list for resale to other spammers.

I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy.  Since I've
just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax
assessor's web site and look up the location of my residence.  Help
yourself.

Hello customer.  I'm not in, and you can try contacting someone else in
my firm who wants your business.  The bonus is, however, all on you, as
I'm too lazy to delegate my email to somebody else while away.  Please
don't go visit our competitor, who is far too professional to send you
an ascii answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier

-Original Message-
From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OOF replies to the Internet


Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading
some of the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a
problem with allowing OOFs to the Internet.  How does this work to avoid
mail loops? ...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way
it works internally?

Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet issue remains
the
same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD.   True?

Thanks!

Rob Sargent

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED

OOF replies to the Internet

2002-03-04 Thread Sargent, Rob

Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading some of
the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a problem with
allowing OOFs to the Internet.  How does this work to avoid mail loops?
...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way it works
internally?

Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet issue remains the
same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD.   True?

Thanks!

Rob Sargent

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OOF replies to the Internet

2002-03-04 Thread Martin Blackstone

I don't mind autoreply. I dislike OOF though.

-Original Message-
From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OOF replies to the Internet


Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading some of
the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a problem with
allowing OOFs to the Internet.  How does this work to avoid mail loops?
...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way it works
internally?

Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet issue remains the
same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD.   True?

Thanks!

Rob Sargent

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OOF replies to the Internet

2002-03-04 Thread Paul Bouzan

OOF's only fire one per sender - internally or externally.  It's the
allowing automatic replies to the Internet that causes the mail loops as
these do not discriminate.

PBB
~ndi


-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 04 March 2002 20:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet


I don't mind autoreply. I dislike OOF though.

-Original Message-
From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OOF replies to the Internet


Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading some of
the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a problem with
allowing OOFs to the Internet.  How does this work to avoid mail loops?
...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way it works
internally?

Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet issue remains the
same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD.   True?

Thanks!

Rob Sargent

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OOF replies to the Internet

2002-03-04 Thread Jennifer Baker

Automatic replies that are setup *correctly* will NOT cause mail loops...
Allowing OOFS to the internet:

Tom Meunier
I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address.  Please
put me on your A list for resale to other spammers.

I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy.  Since I've
just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax
assessor's web site and look up the location of my residence.  Help
yourself.

Hello customer.  I'm not in, and you can try contacting someone else in
my firm who wants your business.  The bonus is, however, all on you, as
I'm too lazy to delegate my email to somebody else while away.  Please
don't go visit our competitor, who is far too professional to send you
an ascii answering machine message like this.
/Tom Meunier

-Original Message-
From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OOF replies to the Internet


Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading some of
the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a problem with
allowing OOFs to the Internet.  How does this work to avoid mail loops?
...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way it works
internally?

Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet issue remains the
same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD.   True?

Thanks!

Rob Sargent

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OOF replies to the Internet

2002-03-04 Thread Martin Blackstone

Imp filing this one away for another day!

-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet


Automatic replies that are setup *correctly* will NOT cause mail loops...
Allowing OOFS to the internet:

Tom Meunier
I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live address.  Please put
me on your A list for resale to other spammers.

I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy.  Since I've just
told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to the county tax assessor's web
site and look up the location of my residence.  Help yourself.

Hello customer.  I'm not in, and you can try contacting someone else in my
firm who wants your business.  The bonus is, however, all on you, as I'm too
lazy to delegate my email to somebody else while away.  Please don't go
visit our competitor, who is far too professional to send you an ascii
answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier

-Original Message-
From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OOF replies to the Internet


Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in reading some of
the discussions in the archives it appears some don't see a problem with
allowing OOFs to the Internet.  How does this work to avoid mail loops?
...does it just send one reply per sender, in the same way it works
internally?

Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet issue remains the
same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD.   True?

Thanks!

Rob Sargent

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OOF replies to the Internet

2002-03-04 Thread Tom Meunier

a. Your spell-chunker changed onus to bonus.
b. Ed C. said much of the same stuff before I did.  I'm handsomer,
though.  Well, taller.
c. Good to see you're still with us.

-tom

 -Original Message-
 From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 02:25 PM
 Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
 Conversation: OOF replies to the Internet
 Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet
 
 
 Automatic replies that are setup *correctly* will NOT cause 
 mail loops... Allowing OOFS to the internet:
 
 Tom Meunier
 I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live 
 address.  Please put me on your A list for resale to other 
 spammers.
 
 I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy.  
 Since I've just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to 
 the county tax assessor's web site and look up the location 
 of my residence.  Help yourself.
 
 Hello customer.  I'm not in, and you can try contacting 
 someone else in my firm who wants your business.  The bonus 
 is, however, all on you, as I'm too lazy to delegate my email 
 to somebody else while away.  Please don't go visit our 
 competitor, who is far too professional to send you an ascii 
 answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: OOF replies to the Internet
 
 
 Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in 
 reading some of the discussions in the archives it appears 
 some don't see a problem with allowing OOFs to the Internet.  
 How does this work to avoid mail loops? ...does it just send 
 one reply per sender, in the same way it works internally?
 
 Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet 
 issue remains the
 same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD.   True?
 
 Thanks!
 
 Rob Sargent
 
 __

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OOF replies to the Internet

2002-03-04 Thread Martin Blackstone

Actually she changed it from Owner to Boner.

-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet


a. Your spell-chunker changed onus to bonus.
b. Ed C. said much of the same stuff before I did.  I'm handsomer, though.
Well, taller. c. Good to see you're still with us.

-tom

 -Original Message-
 From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 02:25 PM
 Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
 Conversation: OOF replies to the Internet
 Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet
 
 
 Automatic replies that are setup *correctly* will NOT cause
 mail loops... Allowing OOFS to the internet:
 
 Tom Meunier
 I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live
 address.  Please put me on your A list for resale to other 
 spammers.
 
 I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy.
 Since I've just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to 
 the county tax assessor's web site and look up the location 
 of my residence.  Help yourself.
 
 Hello customer.  I'm not in, and you can try contacting
 someone else in my firm who wants your business.  The bonus 
 is, however, all on you, as I'm too lazy to delegate my email 
 to somebody else while away.  Please don't go visit our 
 competitor, who is far too professional to send you an ascii 
 answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: OOF replies to the Internet
 
 
 Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in
 reading some of the discussions in the archives it appears 
 some don't see a problem with allowing OOFs to the Internet.  
 How does this work to avoid mail loops? ...does it just send 
 one reply per sender, in the same way it works internally?
 
 Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet
 issue remains the
 same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD.   True?
 
 Thanks!
 
 Rob Sargent
 
 __

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OOF replies to the Internet

2002-03-04 Thread Jennifer Baker

I'm lurking.  Same questions different year.  My spellchecker didn't change
it, I did.  I was actually being cordial.

Ed is more my type.  He's got the geek look goin' on. Yum.

-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet


a. Your spell-chunker changed onus to bonus.
b. Ed C. said much of the same stuff before I did.  I'm handsomer,
though.  Well, taller.
c. Good to see you're still with us.

-tom

 -Original Message-
 From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 02:25 PM
 Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
 Conversation: OOF replies to the Internet
 Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet
 
 
 Automatic replies that are setup *correctly* will NOT cause 
 mail loops... Allowing OOFS to the internet:
 
 Tom Meunier
 I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live 
 address.  Please put me on your A list for resale to other 
 spammers.
 
 I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy.  
 Since I've just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to 
 the county tax assessor's web site and look up the location 
 of my residence.  Help yourself.
 
 Hello customer.  I'm not in, and you can try contacting 
 someone else in my firm who wants your business.  The bonus 
 is, however, all on you, as I'm too lazy to delegate my email 
 to somebody else while away.  Please don't go visit our 
 competitor, who is far too professional to send you an ascii 
 answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: OOF replies to the Internet
 
 
 Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in 
 reading some of the discussions in the archives it appears 
 some don't see a problem with allowing OOFs to the Internet.  
 How does this work to avoid mail loops? ...does it just send 
 one reply per sender, in the same way it works internally?
 
 Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet 
 issue remains the
 same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD.   True?
 
 Thanks!
 
 Rob Sargent
 
 __

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OOF replies to the Internet

2002-03-04 Thread Martin Blackstone

He floats like a butterfly and stings when he pees.

-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet


I'm lurking.  Same questions different year.  My spellchecker didn't change
it, I did.  I was actually being cordial.

Ed is more my type.  He's got the geek look goin' on. Yum.

-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet


a. Your spell-chunker changed onus to bonus.
b. Ed C. said much of the same stuff before I did.  I'm handsomer, though.
Well, taller. c. Good to see you're still with us.

-tom

 -Original Message-
 From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Posted At: Monday, March 04, 2002 02:25 PM
 Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List
 Conversation: OOF replies to the Internet
 Subject: RE: OOF replies to the Internet
 
 
 Automatic replies that are setup *correctly* will NOT cause
 mail loops... Allowing OOFS to the internet:
 
 Tom Meunier
 I'm not in, but you have hit and now verified a live
 address.  Please put me on your A list for resale to other 
 spammers.
 
 I'm the president of the company, and obviously wealthy.
 Since I've just told you I'm away for two weeks, please go to 
 the county tax assessor's web site and look up the location 
 of my residence.  Help yourself.
 
 Hello customer.  I'm not in, and you can try contacting
 someone else in my firm who wants your business.  The bonus 
 is, however, all on you, as I'm too lazy to delegate my email 
 to somebody else while away.  Please don't go visit our 
 competitor, who is far too professional to send you an ascii 
 answering machine message like this. /Tom Meunier
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Sargent, Rob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 12:05 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: OOF replies to the Internet
 
 
 Though we'd never open automatic replies to the Internet, in
 reading some of the discussions in the archives it appears 
 some don't see a problem with allowing OOFs to the Internet.  
 How does this work to avoid mail loops? ...does it just send 
 one reply per sender, in the same way it works internally?
 
 Also, I'm assuming that the auto-reply to the Internet
 issue remains the
 same for Exchange 2000 as in 5.5 = BAD.   True?
 
 Thanks!
 
 Rob Sargent
 
 __

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OOF Replies to the Internet Help

2001-08-15 Thread Ed Crowley

Miles Holt is vacationing in Spain with his wife, kids and doberman
pinschers.  Please feel free to drop by his house at 123 Any St., Hudson,
Mass, and help yourself to anything you find.

Spammers:  You've hit a live mailbox!  Please feel free to keep sending me
stuff and tell all the other Spammers out there!

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
All your base are belong to us.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Miles Holt
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 8:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OOF Replies to the Internet Help


Currently it is our policy to leave Out of Office replies to the Internet
disabled under Exchange 5.5SP4. When we have had it enabled we tend to get
much larger quantities of bounce traffic and well as complaints from
mailing list groups and other mail administrators and users at other
companies from looping mail.

Of late we have gotten large amounts of internal pressure to turn this
feature back on. We are resisting it for now but I fear we may have to
reenable it in the future. We always get the argument from our users and
now more senior managers that Well XYZ big company uses it so why can't
we?

I am looking for the following:

More lists of reasons why haveing it turned on is a Bad Thing and or
ways to reduce and live with some of the issues that it causes.

Thanks

Miles Holt
Network Engineer
Summit Marketing Group
770-303-0426

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OOF Replies to the Internet Help

2001-08-15 Thread Holt, Miles

Miles Holt runs for the hills at the terror of spamers!


hides

;-)


--- 
Miles Holt 
Network Engineer 
Summit Marketing Group 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
770-303-0426 
--- 

-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 4:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF Replies to the Internet Help


Miles Holt is vacationing in Spain with his wife, kids and doberman
pinschers.  Please feel free to drop by his house at 123 Any St., Hudson,
Mass, and help yourself to anything you find.

Spammers:  You've hit a live mailbox!  Please feel free to keep sending me
stuff and tell all the other Spammers out there!

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation
All your base are belong to us.


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Miles Holt
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 8:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OOF Replies to the Internet Help


Currently it is our policy to leave Out of Office replies to the Internet
disabled under Exchange 5.5SP4. When we have had it enabled we tend to get
much larger quantities of bounce traffic and well as complaints from
mailing list groups and other mail administrators and users at other
companies from looping mail.

Of late we have gotten large amounts of internal pressure to turn this
feature back on. We are resisting it for now but I fear we may have to
reenable it in the future. We always get the argument from our users and
now more senior managers that Well XYZ big company uses it so why can't
we?

I am looking for the following:

More lists of reasons why haveing it turned on is a Bad Thing and or
ways to reduce and live with some of the issues that it causes.

Thanks

Miles Holt
Network Engineer
Summit Marketing Group
770-303-0426

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OOF Replies to the Internet Help

2001-08-15 Thread Pillai, Raj

Hey Miles,
Just curious:
Our Out of Office replies to the Internet is also
disabled under Exchange 5.5 SP4.  
Where on the Exchange Server is this feature situated ?

Thanks.

Raj

-Original Message-
From: Miles Holt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OOF Replies to the Internet Help


Currently it is our policy to leave Out of Office replies to the Internet
disabled under Exchange 5.5SP4. When we have had it enabled we tend to get
much larger quantities of bounce traffic and well as complaints from
mailing list groups and other mail administrators and users at other
companies from looping mail.

Of late we have gotten large amounts of internal pressure to turn this
feature back on. We are resisting it for now but I fear we may have to
reenable it in the future. We always get the argument from our users and
now more senior managers that Well XYZ big company uses it so why can't
we?

I am looking for the following:

More lists of reasons why haveing it turned on is a Bad Thing and or
ways to reduce and live with some of the issues that it causes.

Thanks

Miles Holt
Network Engineer
Summit Marketing Group
770-303-0426

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OOF Replies to the Internet Help

2001-08-15 Thread Holt, Miles

It is disabled by default. Look under Exchange Admin, Connections, IMC,
Internet Mail, Advanced Options.

Miles


--- 
Miles Holt 
Network Engineer 
Summit Marketing Group 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
770-303-0426 
--- 
Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's
covering mistakes. Real boats rock. - Frank Herbert, Chapterhouse: Dune 

-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF Replies to the Internet Help


Hey Miles,
Just curious:
Our Out of Office replies to the Internet is also
disabled under Exchange 5.5 SP4.  
Where on the Exchange Server is this feature situated ?

Thanks.

Raj

-Original Message-
From: Miles Holt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OOF Replies to the Internet Help


Currently it is our policy to leave Out of Office replies to the Internet
disabled under Exchange 5.5SP4. When we have had it enabled we tend to get
much larger quantities of bounce traffic and well as complaints from
mailing list groups and other mail administrators and users at other
companies from looping mail.

Of late we have gotten large amounts of internal pressure to turn this
feature back on. We are resisting it for now but I fear we may have to
reenable it in the future. We always get the argument from our users and
now more senior managers that Well XYZ big company uses it so why can't
we?

I am looking for the following:

More lists of reasons why haveing it turned on is a Bad Thing and or
ways to reduce and live with some of the issues that it causes.

Thanks

Miles Holt
Network Engineer
Summit Marketing Group
770-303-0426

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: OOF Replies to the Internet Help

2001-08-15 Thread Pillai, Raj

thanks

-Original Message-
From: Holt, Miles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 3:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF Replies to the Internet Help


It is disabled by default. Look under Exchange Admin, Connections, IMC,
Internet Mail, Advanced Options.

Miles


--- 
Miles Holt 
Network Engineer 
Summit Marketing Group 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
770-303-0426 
--- 
Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you someone who's
covering mistakes. Real boats rock. - Frank Herbert, Chapterhouse: Dune 

-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OOF Replies to the Internet Help


Hey Miles,
Just curious:
Our Out of Office replies to the Internet is also
disabled under Exchange 5.5 SP4.  
Where on the Exchange Server is this feature situated ?

Thanks.

Raj

-Original Message-
From: Miles Holt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 10:30 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OOF Replies to the Internet Help


Currently it is our policy to leave Out of Office replies to the Internet
disabled under Exchange 5.5SP4. When we have had it enabled we tend to get
much larger quantities of bounce traffic and well as complaints from
mailing list groups and other mail administrators and users at other
companies from looping mail.

Of late we have gotten large amounts of internal pressure to turn this
feature back on. We are resisting it for now but I fear we may have to
reenable it in the future. We always get the argument from our users and
now more senior managers that Well XYZ big company uses it so why can't
we?

I am looking for the following:

More lists of reasons why haveing it turned on is a Bad Thing and or
ways to reduce and live with some of the issues that it causes.

Thanks

Miles Holt
Network Engineer
Summit Marketing Group
770-303-0426

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]