RE: E5.5 - E2K migration question - Moving servers to new domai ns.

2002-11-20 Thread Roger Seielstad
Other than they're creating more domains? Not really.

I'd suggest being very clear on the downsides and manageability issues of
multiple domain configurations anyway.

The biggest issue, as I see it, depends on whether or not the boxes are in
the same or different Exchange sites. If they're in the same site, it will
work but it will be ugly. If its 4 sites, then it should be easy.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


 -Original Message-
 From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 7:13 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: E5.5 - E2K migration question - Moving servers to 
 new domains.
 
 
 One of the Admins in charge of migrating one of our customers 
 over to E2K
 had a question regarding moving some existing E5.5 servers to 
 new domains
 prior to migration over to E2K so as to minimize replication. 
  I can't think
 of anything that would indicate this would be a problem, but 
 I figured I
 would run this by the list to be sure.
 
 Scenario -
 
 Current environment - 4 E5.5 servers with SP4 (NT 4.x with 
 SP6a) running in
 one domain (DOMAIN A let's call it).
 
 For the purposes of migration they want to move three servers 
 into three
 existing domains.  Each of these domains has a two way trust 
 with DOMAIN A.
 
 In short what will happen is this.
 
 Currently in DOMAIN A
 
  SERVER A
  SERVER B
  SERVER C
  SERVER D
 
 After the move
 
  SERVER A DOMAIN A
  SERVER B DOMAIN B
  SERVER C DOMAIN C
  SERVER D DOMAIN D
 
 Can anyone suggest a reason why this would NOT be a good idea?
 
 Thanks.
 
 Nate Couch
 EDS Messaging
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: E5.5 - E2K migration question - Moving servers to new domai ns.

2002-11-20 Thread Couch, Nate
Good point Roger.  I should have given more information as to the sites.
The four servers are in fact in four separate sites.  So the following is
more accurate:

Currently in DOMAIN A
 
  SERVER A  SITE A
  SERVER B  SITE B
  SERVER C  SITE C
  SERVER D  SITE D
 
After the move
 
  SERVER A  DOMAIN ASITE A
  SERVER B  DOMAIN BSITE B
  SERVER C  DOMAIN CSITE C
  SERVER D  DOMAIN DSITE D


-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 6:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: E5.5 - E2K migration question - Moving servers to new domai
ns.


Other than they're creating more domains? Not really.

I'd suggest being very clear on the downsides and manageability issues of
multiple domain configurations anyway.

The biggest issue, as I see it, depends on whether or not the boxes are in
the same or different Exchange sites. If they're in the same site, it will
work but it will be ugly. If its 4 sites, then it should be easy.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


 -Original Message-
 From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 7:13 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: E5.5 - E2K migration question - Moving servers to 
 new domains.
 
 
 One of the Admins in charge of migrating one of our customers
 over to E2K
 had a question regarding moving some existing E5.5 servers to 
 new domains
 prior to migration over to E2K so as to minimize replication. 
  I can't think
 of anything that would indicate this would be a problem, but 
 I figured I
 would run this by the list to be sure.
 
 Scenario -
 
 Current environment - 4 E5.5 servers with SP4 (NT 4.x with
 SP6a) running in
 one domain (DOMAIN A let's call it).
 
 For the purposes of migration they want to move three servers
 into three
 existing domains.  Each of these domains has a two way trust 
 with DOMAIN A.
 
 In short what will happen is this.
 
 Currently in DOMAIN A
 
  SERVER A
  SERVER B
  SERVER C
  SERVER D
 
 After the move
 
  SERVER A DOMAIN A
  SERVER B DOMAIN B
  SERVER C DOMAIN C
  SERVER D DOMAIN D
 
 Can anyone suggest a reason why this would NOT be a good idea?
 
 Thanks.
 
 Nate Couch
 EDS Messaging
 
 
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: E5.5 - E2K migration question - Moving servers to new domai ns.

2002-11-20 Thread Roger Seielstad
From a technical perspective then there should be no issues. The FAQ has
detailed instructions on making that change.

I'd still argue that the complexity of adding domains and continuing to use
multiple sites should be reconsidered, however.

--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA


 -Original Message-
 From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:31 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: E5.5 - E2K migration question - Moving servers 
 to new domai ns.
 
 
 Good point Roger.  I should have given more information as to 
 the sites.
 The four servers are in fact in four separate sites.  So the 
 following is
 more accurate:
 
 Currently in DOMAIN A
  
   SERVER ASITE A
   SERVER BSITE B
   SERVER CSITE C
   SERVER DSITE D
  
 After the move
  
   SERVER ADOMAIN ASITE A
   SERVER BDOMAIN BSITE B
   SERVER CDOMAIN CSITE C
   SERVER DDOMAIN DSITE D
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 6:55 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: RE: E5.5 - E2K migration question - Moving servers 
 to new domai
 ns.
 
 
 Other than they're creating more domains? Not really.
 
 I'd suggest being very clear on the downsides and 
 manageability issues of
 multiple domain configurations anyway.
 
 The biggest issue, as I see it, depends on whether or not the 
 boxes are in
 the same or different Exchange sites. If they're in the same 
 site, it will
 work but it will be ugly. If its 4 sites, then it should be easy.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
 Atlanta, GA
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 7:13 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: E5.5 - E2K migration question - Moving servers to 
  new domains.
  
  
  One of the Admins in charge of migrating one of our customers
  over to E2K
  had a question regarding moving some existing E5.5 servers to 
  new domains
  prior to migration over to E2K so as to minimize replication. 
   I can't think
  of anything that would indicate this would be a problem, but 
  I figured I
  would run this by the list to be sure.
  
  Scenario -
  
  Current environment - 4 E5.5 servers with SP4 (NT 4.x with
  SP6a) running in
  one domain (DOMAIN A let's call it).
  
  For the purposes of migration they want to move three servers
  into three
  existing domains.  Each of these domains has a two way trust 
  with DOMAIN A.
  
  In short what will happen is this.
  
  Currently in DOMAIN A
  
   SERVER A
   SERVER B
   SERVER C
   SERVER D
  
  After the move
  
   SERVER A   DOMAIN A
   SERVER B   DOMAIN B
   SERVER C   DOMAIN C
   SERVER D   DOMAIN D
  
  Can anyone suggest a reason why this would NOT be a good idea?
  
  Thanks.
  
  Nate Couch
  EDS Messaging
  
  
  
  _
  List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
  Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
  To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: E5.5 - E2K migration question - Moving servers to new domai ns.

2002-11-20 Thread Couch, Nate
It sounds as though you may have softened your opinion on moving the servers
to separate domains prior to transitioning over to E2K.

Is this correct, or am I reading too much into your statement below?

Nate 

 --
 From: Ed Crowley
 Reply To: Exchange Discussions
 Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 10:31
 To:   Exchange Discussions
 Subject:  RE: E5.5 - E2K migration question  - Moving servers to new
 domai ns.
 
 Continuing to use multiple sites (administrative groups) makes sense as
 a transitional step because it's easiest to migrate a site to a new
 administrative group.  Once you're in native mode, you can then migrate
 mailboxes between administrative groups, which eases the burden of
 consolidating to a smaller number of them.
 
 Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
 Tech Consultant
 hp Services
 Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
 Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 5:39 AM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: E5.5 - E2K migration question - Moving servers to new
 domai ns.
 
 
 From a technical perspective then there should be no issues. The FAQ has
 detailed instructions on making that change.
 
 I'd still argue that the complexity of adding domains and continuing to
 use multiple sites should be reconsidered, however.
 
 --
 Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
 Sr. Systems Administrator
 Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
 Atlanta, GA
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 8:31 AM
  To: Exchange Discussions
  Subject: RE: E5.5 - E2K migration question - Moving servers 
  to new domai ns.
  
  
  Good point Roger.  I should have given more information as to
  the sites.
  The four servers are in fact in four separate sites.  So the 
  following is
  more accurate:
  
  Currently in DOMAIN A
   
SERVER A  SITE A
SERVER B  SITE B
SERVER C  SITE C
SERVER D  SITE D
   
  After the move
   
SERVER A  DOMAIN ASITE A
SERVER B  DOMAIN BSITE B
SERVER C  DOMAIN CSITE C
SERVER D  DOMAIN DSITE D
  
  
  -Original Message-
  From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 6:55 AM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: RE: E5.5 - E2K migration question - Moving servers 
  to new domai
  ns.
  
  
  Other than they're creating more domains? Not really.
  
  I'd suggest being very clear on the downsides and
  manageability issues of
  multiple domain configurations anyway.
  
  The biggest issue, as I see it, depends on whether or not the
  boxes are in
  the same or different Exchange sites. If they're in the same 
  site, it will
  work but it will be ugly. If its 4 sites, then it should be easy.
  
  --
  Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
  Sr. Systems Administrator
  Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
  Atlanta, GA
  
  
   -Original Message-
   From: Couch, Nate [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2002 7:13 AM
   To: Exchange Discussions
   Subject: E5.5 - E2K migration question - Moving servers to
   new domains.
   
   
   One of the Admins in charge of migrating one of our customers over 
   to E2K had a question regarding moving some existing E5.5 servers to
   new domains
   prior to migration over to E2K so as to minimize replication. 
I can't think
   of anything that would indicate this would be a problem, but 
   I figured I
   would run this by the list to be sure.
   
   Scenario -
   
   Current environment - 4 E5.5 servers with SP4 (NT 4.x with
   SP6a) running in
   one domain (DOMAIN A let's call it).
   
   For the purposes of migration they want to move three servers into 
   three existing domains.  Each of these domains has a two way trust
   with DOMAIN A.
   
   In short what will happen is this.
   
   Currently in DOMAIN A
   
SERVER A
SERVER B
SERVER C
SERVER D
   
   After the move
   
SERVER A DOMAIN A
SERVER B DOMAIN B
SERVER C DOMAIN C
SERVER D DOMAIN D
   
   Can anyone suggest a reason why this would NOT be a good idea?
   
   Thanks.
   
   Nate Couch
   EDS Messaging
   
   
   
   _
   List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
   Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
   To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED