RE: MIME and Exchange

2002-09-30 Thread Chris . Kindschi

The PMDF software developers happen to include one of the authors of the
MIME RFC, so you can rely on it being standards-compliant.  

The Q article referred to, besides being dated 1998, is talking about using
VMSmail with PMDF, not PMDF Mail with PMDF.  PMDF Mail is the MIME user
agent the article refers to.

Chris Kindschi

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MIME and Exchange


Most other mail servers can send mail to Exchange but PRDL can't. Who seems
to be more at fault?

-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 4:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MIME and Exchange


Well, I think that you are correct in being skeptical of PMDF. First, as
identified in the following Q-article, Innosoft does not appear to even
support this configuration.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q185107;

Innosoft recommends connecting to Exchange via X.400, not SMTP and SMTP
connectivity to Exchange is not recommended or supported (unless something
has changed since this Q-article.)

I would be willing to bet that the issue that you are experiencing is very
similar in nature to the issues in the Q-article. It likely is some issue
with the PDMF client or gateway not properly formatting the MIME message.

Let me know if any of this is helpful or if you need some additional
information. The simple fact that Innosoft does not support your
configuration is a pretty damning evidence to the fact that PMDF is at
fault.

 Here's the story. We have essentially 2 systems...legacy system running
 PMDF mail, and the Windows end running Exchange 2000. Users frequently
 send messages, with attachments(simple text files) or bodies full of
 text(plain...fixed width), from the legacy end, via PMDF 6.11, to the
 Exchange Server ( Windows 2000 sp2, exchange sp2) and the messages are
 read with a mix of Outlook 2000 - 2002.=20
 
 Recently, some of these mails have not been reaching users inbox in
 Outlook. PMDF logs show that the message was sent, but no acknowledgment
 was received from Exchange, so PMDF marks it as a failure, and backs off
 and tries again later. SMTP logs on the Exchange Server show EHLO, MAIL,
 RCPT commands but no DATA or QUIT commands as a successful SMTP
 conversation would.
 
 Playing around with it some more resulted in some more data...it's
 possible to force PMDF to send the attachment as different MIME parts.
 If the attachment comes across as the 2nd MIME part it gets delivered on
 Exchange with no problem...but if it's included as the 1st MIME part, it
 doesn't come through. Note that the message isn't long...it just has a
 lot of columns.(224) sometimes with characters and things like tabs, *,
 - or ~'s. If we send just a short message, and short attachment, in the
 first MIME part, it comes across...thus leading me to believe that
 there's some kind of byte limitation in the first MIME part.
 
 PMDF support, and the PMDF admin here thinks it's Exchange...that it's
 in violation of some MIME RFC...I don't know. I can grab one of the
 files that won't come over and send it to Exchange from Yahoo, Hotmail,
 or AOL (yuck) and it comes over without a problem...I know that most
 mail services embed the attachments in the 2nd MIME part, but I think
 that's because even if you don't include any body text, they stick in
 that dumb advertising in the body of the message, thus forcing the
 attachment into MIME part #2.
 
 They are telling me to call PSS about this...but I hesitate to do so
 because stuff like this inevitably winds up being a PMDF screw up or
 misconfiguration (in case you haven't figured it out by now, I hate
 PMDF).
 
 Latest version of Trend Scanmail for Exchange 2000 is installed and
 running on the Exchange 2000 box.=20
 
 Thanks in advance.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MIME and Exchange

2002-09-30 Thread Webb, Andy

That just makes him more opinionated about his interpretation of the
RFC! :)

PMDF *is* usually pretty good about adherence to the spec though.  And
it lets you tune lots of stuff too.

Without seeing the entire MIME structure of the message, it's hard to
say if it's correct, loosely interpreted, or incorrect.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Posted At: Monday, September 30, 2002 3:59 PM
Posted To: Microsoft Exchange
Conversation: MIME and Exchange
Subject: RE: MIME and Exchange


The PMDF software developers happen to include one of the authors of the
MIME RFC, so you can rely on it being standards-compliant.  

The Q article referred to, besides being dated 1998, is talking about
using VMSmail with PMDF, not PMDF Mail with PMDF.  PMDF Mail is the MIME
user agent the article refers to.

Chris Kindschi

-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MIME and Exchange


Most other mail servers can send mail to Exchange but PRDL can't. Who
seems to be more at fault?

-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 4:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MIME and Exchange


Well, I think that you are correct in being skeptical of PMDF. First, as
identified in the following Q-article, Innosoft does not appear to even
support this configuration.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q185107;

Innosoft recommends connecting to Exchange via X.400, not SMTP and SMTP
connectivity to Exchange is not recommended or supported (unless
something has changed since this Q-article.)

I would be willing to bet that the issue that you are experiencing is
very similar in nature to the issues in the Q-article. It likely is some
issue with the PDMF client or gateway not properly formatting the MIME
message.

Let me know if any of this is helpful or if you need some additional
information. The simple fact that Innosoft does not support your
configuration is a pretty damning evidence to the fact that PMDF is at
fault.

 Here's the story. We have essentially 2 systems...legacy system 
 running PMDF mail, and the Windows end running Exchange 2000. Users 
 frequently send messages, with attachments(simple text files) or 
 bodies full of text(plain...fixed width), from the legacy end, via 
 PMDF 6.11, to the Exchange Server ( Windows 2000 sp2, exchange sp2) 
 and the messages are read with a mix of Outlook 2000 - 2002.=20
 
 Recently, some of these mails have not been reaching users inbox in 
 Outlook. PMDF logs show that the message was sent, but no 
 acknowledgment was received from Exchange, so PMDF marks it as a 
 failure, and backs off and tries again later. SMTP logs on the 
 Exchange Server show EHLO, MAIL, RCPT commands but no DATA or QUIT 
 commands as a successful SMTP conversation would.
 
 Playing around with it some more resulted in some more data...it's 
 possible to force PMDF to send the attachment as different MIME parts.

 If the attachment comes across as the 2nd MIME part it gets delivered 
 on Exchange with no problem...but if it's included as the 1st MIME 
 part, it doesn't come through. Note that the message isn't long...it 
 just has a lot of columns.(224) sometimes with characters and things 
 like tabs, *,
 - or ~'s. If we send just a short message, and short attachment, in
the
 first MIME part, it comes across...thus leading me to believe that
 there's some kind of byte limitation in the first MIME part.
 
 PMDF support, and the PMDF admin here thinks it's Exchange...that it's

 in violation of some MIME RFC...I don't know. I can grab one of the 
 files that won't come over and send it to Exchange from Yahoo, 
 Hotmail, or AOL (yuck) and it comes over without a problem...I know 
 that most mail services embed the attachments in the 2nd MIME part, 
 but I think that's because even if you don't include any body text, 
 they stick in that dumb advertising in the body of the message, thus 
 forcing the attachment into MIME part #2.
 
 They are telling me to call PSS about this...but I hesitate to do so 
 because stuff like this inevitably winds up being a PMDF screw up or 
 misconfiguration (in case you haven't figured it out by now, I hate 
 PMDF).
 
 Latest version of Trend Scanmail for Exchange 2000 is installed and 
 running on the Exchange 2000 box.=20
 
 Thanks in advance.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp

RE: MIME and Exchange

2002-09-27 Thread Andrey Fyodorov

Not sure. Some time ago I had an issue where Gordano NT Mail and Exchange 2000 could 
not communicate reliably with each other. We had to dumb down Exchange - US ASCII 
instead of default Western European ISO-8859-1 (default). Provide message body as 
plain text. I guess all these were for traffic from Exchange to NT Mail.

Also I am looking at the settings right now. For the inbound traffic on the Exchange 
server we set the SMTP Virtual Server to  only process 1 message per connection. For 
some reason NT Mail and Exchange did not agree on processing multiple messages per 
connection.

-Original Message-
From: Joe Berthiaume [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 5:33 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MIME and Exchange


Andrey-

This is an interesting point...i've forwarded it on to the PMDF
guys...the only question I have is, if the encoding were screwed up, why
are only certain files/mail messages getting hung up? 



-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 4:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MIME and Exchange

If there is no DATA command, how does Exchange ever know that the data
will be MIME or something else? I think there is something else going on
there like different character sets or 7-bit vs 8-bit encoding.

Also is there any way to force that PRDL system to send messages in
UUENCODE?

-Original Message-
From: Joe Berthiaume [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MIME and Exchange



Here's the story. We have essentially 2 systems...legacy system running
PMDF mail, and the Windows end running Exchange 2000. Users frequently
send messages, with attachments(simple text files) or bodies full of
text(plain...fixed width), from the legacy end, via PMDF 6.11, to the
Exchange Server ( Windows 2000 sp2, exchange sp2) and the messages are
read with a mix of Outlook 2000 - 2002. 

Recently, some of these mails have not been reaching users inbox in
Outlook. PMDF logs show that the message was sent, but no acknowledgment
was received from Exchange, so PMDF marks it as a failure, and backs off
and tries again later. SMTP logs on the Exchange Server show EHLO, MAIL,
RCPT commands but no DATA or QUIT commands as a successful SMTP
conversation would.

Playing around with it some more resulted in some more data...it's
possible to force PMDF to send the attachment as different MIME parts.
If the attachment comes across as the 2nd MIME part it gets delivered on
Exchange with no problem...but if it's included as the 1st MIME part, it
doesn't come through. Note that the message isn't long...it just has a
lot of columns.(224) sometimes with characters and things like tabs, *,
- or ~'s. If we send just a short message, and short attachment, in the
first MIME part, it comes across...thus leading me to believe that
there's some kind of byte limitation in the first MIME part.

PMDF support, and the PMDF admin here thinks it's Exchange...that it's
in violation of some MIME RFC...I don't know. I can grab one of the
files that won't come over and send it to Exchange from Yahoo, Hotmail,
or AOL (yuck) and it comes over without a problem...I know that most
mail services embed the attachments in the 2nd MIME part, but I think
that's because even if you don't include any body text, they stick in
that dumb advertising in the body of the message, thus forcing the
attachment into MIME part #2.

They are telling me to call PSS about this...but I hesitate to do so
because stuff like this inevitably winds up being a PMDF screw up or
misconfiguration (in case you haven't figured it out by now, I hate
PMDF).

Latest version of Trend Scanmail for Exchange 2000 is installed and
running on the Exchange 2000 box. 

Thanks in advance.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: MIME and Exchange

2002-09-27 Thread Dupler, Craig

Did you run the obvious other set of tests? Try sending from PMDF to those
other mail systems as well.  If you cough up the same errors, then . . . 

-Original Message-
From: Joe Berthiaume [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MIME and Exchange



Here's the story. We have essentially 2 systems...legacy system running
PMDF mail, and the Windows end running Exchange 2000. Users frequently
send messages, with attachments(simple text files) or bodies full of
text(plain...fixed width), from the legacy end, via PMDF 6.11, to the
Exchange Server ( Windows 2000 sp2, exchange sp2) and the messages are
read with a mix of Outlook 2000 - 2002. 

Recently, some of these mails have not been reaching users inbox in
Outlook. PMDF logs show that the message was sent, but no acknowledgment
was received from Exchange, so PMDF marks it as a failure, and backs off
and tries again later. SMTP logs on the Exchange Server show EHLO, MAIL,
RCPT commands but no DATA or QUIT commands as a successful SMTP
conversation would.

Playing around with it some more resulted in some more data...it's
possible to force PMDF to send the attachment as different MIME parts.
If the attachment comes across as the 2nd MIME part it gets delivered on
Exchange with no problem...but if it's included as the 1st MIME part, it
doesn't come through. Note that the message isn't long...it just has a
lot of columns.(224) sometimes with characters and things like tabs, *,
- or ~'s. If we send just a short message, and short attachment, in the
first MIME part, it comes across...thus leading me to believe that
there's some kind of byte limitation in the first MIME part.

PMDF support, and the PMDF admin here thinks it's Exchange...that it's
in violation of some MIME RFC...I don't know. I can grab one of the
files that won't come over and send it to Exchange from Yahoo, Hotmail,
or AOL (yuck) and it comes over without a problem...I know that most
mail services embed the attachments in the 2nd MIME part, but I think
that's because even if you don't include any body text, they stick in
that dumb advertising in the body of the message, thus forcing the
attachment into MIME part #2.

They are telling me to call PSS about this...but I hesitate to do so
because stuff like this inevitably winds up being a PMDF screw up or
misconfiguration (in case you haven't figured it out by now, I hate
PMDF).

Latest version of Trend Scanmail for Exchange 2000 is installed and
running on the Exchange 2000 box. 

Thanks in advance.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: MIME and Exchange

2002-09-26 Thread Greg Deckler

Well, I think that you are correct in being skeptical of PMDF. First, as
identified in the following Q-article, Innosoft does not appear to even
support this configuration.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q185107;

Innosoft recommends connecting to Exchange via X.400, not SMTP and SMTP
connectivity to Exchange is not recommended or supported (unless something
has changed since this Q-article.)

I would be willing to bet that the issue that you are experiencing is very
similar in nature to the issues in the Q-article. It likely is some issue
with the PDMF client or gateway not properly formatting the MIME message.

Let me know if any of this is helpful or if you need some additional
information. The simple fact that Innosoft does not support your
configuration is a pretty damning evidence to the fact that PMDF is at
fault.

 Here's the story. We have essentially 2 systems...legacy system running
 PMDF mail, and the Windows end running Exchange 2000. Users frequently
 send messages, with attachments(simple text files) or bodies full of
 text(plain...fixed width), from the legacy end, via PMDF 6.11, to the
 Exchange Server ( Windows 2000 sp2, exchange sp2) and the messages are
 read with a mix of Outlook 2000 - 2002.=20
 
 Recently, some of these mails have not been reaching users inbox in
 Outlook. PMDF logs show that the message was sent, but no acknowledgment
 was received from Exchange, so PMDF marks it as a failure, and backs off
 and tries again later. SMTP logs on the Exchange Server show EHLO, MAIL,
 RCPT commands but no DATA or QUIT commands as a successful SMTP
 conversation would.
 
 Playing around with it some more resulted in some more data...it's
 possible to force PMDF to send the attachment as different MIME parts.
 If the attachment comes across as the 2nd MIME part it gets delivered on
 Exchange with no problem...but if it's included as the 1st MIME part, it
 doesn't come through. Note that the message isn't long...it just has a
 lot of columns.(224) sometimes with characters and things like tabs, *,
 - or ~'s. If we send just a short message, and short attachment, in the
 first MIME part, it comes across...thus leading me to believe that
 there's some kind of byte limitation in the first MIME part.
 
 PMDF support, and the PMDF admin here thinks it's Exchange...that it's
 in violation of some MIME RFC...I don't know. I can grab one of the
 files that won't come over and send it to Exchange from Yahoo, Hotmail,
 or AOL (yuck) and it comes over without a problem...I know that most
 mail services embed the attachments in the 2nd MIME part, but I think
 that's because even if you don't include any body text, they stick in
 that dumb advertising in the body of the message, thus forcing the
 attachment into MIME part #2.
 
 They are telling me to call PSS about this...but I hesitate to do so
 because stuff like this inevitably winds up being a PMDF screw up or
 misconfiguration (in case you haven't figured it out by now, I hate
 PMDF).
 
 Latest version of Trend Scanmail for Exchange 2000 is installed and
 running on the Exchange 2000 box.=20
 
 Thanks in advance.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MIME and Exchange

2002-09-26 Thread Andrey Fyodorov

If there is no DATA command, how does Exchange ever know that the data will be MIME or 
something else? I think there is something else going on there like different 
character sets or 7-bit vs 8-bit encoding.

Also is there any way to force that PRDL system to send messages in UUENCODE?

-Original Message-
From: Joe Berthiaume [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MIME and Exchange



Here's the story. We have essentially 2 systems...legacy system running
PMDF mail, and the Windows end running Exchange 2000. Users frequently
send messages, with attachments(simple text files) or bodies full of
text(plain...fixed width), from the legacy end, via PMDF 6.11, to the
Exchange Server ( Windows 2000 sp2, exchange sp2) and the messages are
read with a mix of Outlook 2000 - 2002. 

Recently, some of these mails have not been reaching users inbox in
Outlook. PMDF logs show that the message was sent, but no acknowledgment
was received from Exchange, so PMDF marks it as a failure, and backs off
and tries again later. SMTP logs on the Exchange Server show EHLO, MAIL,
RCPT commands but no DATA or QUIT commands as a successful SMTP
conversation would.

Playing around with it some more resulted in some more data...it's
possible to force PMDF to send the attachment as different MIME parts.
If the attachment comes across as the 2nd MIME part it gets delivered on
Exchange with no problem...but if it's included as the 1st MIME part, it
doesn't come through. Note that the message isn't long...it just has a
lot of columns.(224) sometimes with characters and things like tabs, *,
- or ~'s. If we send just a short message, and short attachment, in the
first MIME part, it comes across...thus leading me to believe that
there's some kind of byte limitation in the first MIME part.

PMDF support, and the PMDF admin here thinks it's Exchange...that it's
in violation of some MIME RFC...I don't know. I can grab one of the
files that won't come over and send it to Exchange from Yahoo, Hotmail,
or AOL (yuck) and it comes over without a problem...I know that most
mail services embed the attachments in the 2nd MIME part, but I think
that's because even if you don't include any body text, they stick in
that dumb advertising in the body of the message, thus forcing the
attachment into MIME part #2.

They are telling me to call PSS about this...but I hesitate to do so
because stuff like this inevitably winds up being a PMDF screw up or
misconfiguration (in case you haven't figured it out by now, I hate
PMDF).

Latest version of Trend Scanmail for Exchange 2000 is installed and
running on the Exchange 2000 box. 

Thanks in advance.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MIME and Exchange

2002-09-26 Thread Joe Berthiaume

Thanks Greg.

I suspect you are right in so much as PMDF is mangling the message
somehow. I'm not sure what the latest and greatest method of integrating
Exchange and PMDF is...especially since after that Q was written, PMDF
was dropped by Innosoft and picked up by Process Software (the same guys
that support MultiNet, another pain in my side but we won't get into
that now)



-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 4:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: MIME and Exchange

Well, I think that you are correct in being skeptical of PMDF. First, as
identified in the following Q-article, Innosoft does not appear to even
support this configuration.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q185107;

Innosoft recommends connecting to Exchange via X.400, not SMTP and SMTP
connectivity to Exchange is not recommended or supported (unless
something
has changed since this Q-article.)

I would be willing to bet that the issue that you are experiencing is
very
similar in nature to the issues in the Q-article. It likely is some
issue
with the PDMF client or gateway not properly formatting the MIME
message.

Let me know if any of this is helpful or if you need some additional
information. The simple fact that Innosoft does not support your
configuration is a pretty damning evidence to the fact that PMDF is at
fault.

 Here's the story. We have essentially 2 systems...legacy system
running
 PMDF mail, and the Windows end running Exchange 2000. Users frequently
 send messages, with attachments(simple text files) or bodies full of
 text(plain...fixed width), from the legacy end, via PMDF 6.11, to the
 Exchange Server ( Windows 2000 sp2, exchange sp2) and the messages are
 read with a mix of Outlook 2000 - 2002.=20
 
 Recently, some of these mails have not been reaching users inbox in
 Outlook. PMDF logs show that the message was sent, but no
acknowledgment
 was received from Exchange, so PMDF marks it as a failure, and backs
off
 and tries again later. SMTP logs on the Exchange Server show EHLO,
MAIL,
 RCPT commands but no DATA or QUIT commands as a successful SMTP
 conversation would.
 
 Playing around with it some more resulted in some more data...it's
 possible to force PMDF to send the attachment as different MIME parts.
 If the attachment comes across as the 2nd MIME part it gets delivered
on
 Exchange with no problem...but if it's included as the 1st MIME part,
it
 doesn't come through. Note that the message isn't long...it just has a
 lot of columns.(224) sometimes with characters and things like tabs,
*,
 - or ~'s. If we send just a short message, and short attachment, in
the
 first MIME part, it comes across...thus leading me to believe that
 there's some kind of byte limitation in the first MIME part.
 
 PMDF support, and the PMDF admin here thinks it's Exchange...that it's
 in violation of some MIME RFC...I don't know. I can grab one of the
 files that won't come over and send it to Exchange from Yahoo,
Hotmail,
 or AOL (yuck) and it comes over without a problem...I know that most
 mail services embed the attachments in the 2nd MIME part, but I think
 that's because even if you don't include any body text, they stick in
 that dumb advertising in the body of the message, thus forcing the
 attachment into MIME part #2.
 
 They are telling me to call PSS about this...but I hesitate to do so
 because stuff like this inevitably winds up being a PMDF screw up or
 misconfiguration (in case you haven't figured it out by now, I hate
 PMDF).
 
 Latest version of Trend Scanmail for Exchange 2000 is installed and
 running on the Exchange 2000 box.=20
 
 Thanks in advance.

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MIME and Exchange

2002-09-26 Thread Chris Scharff

The one that isn't RFC Compliant for this particular issue.

 -Original Message-
 From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 3:49 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: RE: MIME and Exchange
 
 
 Most other mail servers can send mail to Exchange but PRDL 
 can't. Who seems to be more at fault?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 4:21 PM
 To: Exchange Discussions
 Subject: Re: MIME and Exchange
 
 
 Well, I think that you are correct in being skeptical of 
 PMDF. First, as identified in the following Q-article, 
 Innosoft does not appear to even support this configuration.
 
 http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;EN-US;Q185107;
 
 Innosoft recommends connecting to Exchange via X.400, not 
 SMTP and SMTP connectivity to Exchange is not recommended or 
 supported (unless something has changed since this Q-article.)
 
 I would be willing to bet that the issue that you are 
 experiencing is very similar in nature to the issues in the 
 Q-article. It likely is some issue with the PDMF client or 
 gateway not properly formatting the MIME message.
 
 Let me know if any of this is helpful or if you need some 
 additional information. The simple fact that Innosoft does 
 not support your configuration is a pretty damning evidence 
 to the fact that PMDF is at fault.
 
  Here's the story. We have essentially 2 systems...legacy system 
  running PMDF mail, and the Windows end running Exchange 2000. Users 
  frequently send messages, with attachments(simple text files) or 
  bodies full of text(plain...fixed width), from the legacy end, via 
  PMDF 6.11, to the Exchange Server ( Windows 2000 sp2, exchange sp2) 
  and the messages are read with a mix of Outlook 2000 - 2002.=20
  
  Recently, some of these mails have not been reaching users inbox in 
  Outlook. PMDF logs show that the message was sent, but no 
  acknowledgment was received from Exchange, so PMDF marks it as a 
  failure, and backs off and tries again later. SMTP logs on the 
  Exchange Server show EHLO, MAIL, RCPT commands but no DATA or QUIT 
  commands as a successful SMTP conversation would.
  
  Playing around with it some more resulted in some more data...it's 
  possible to force PMDF to send the attachment as different 
 MIME parts. 
  If the attachment comes across as the 2nd MIME part it gets 
 delivered 
  on Exchange with no problem...but if it's included as the 1st MIME 
  part, it doesn't come through. Note that the message isn't 
 long...it 
  just has a lot of columns.(224) sometimes with characters 
 and things 
  like tabs, *,
  - or ~'s. If we send just a short message, and short 
 attachment, in the
  first MIME part, it comes across...thus leading me to believe that
  there's some kind of byte limitation in the first MIME part.
  
  PMDF support, and the PMDF admin here thinks it's 
 Exchange...that it's 
  in violation of some MIME RFC...I don't know. I can grab 
 one of the 
  files that won't come over and send it to Exchange from Yahoo, 
  Hotmail, or AOL (yuck) and it comes over without a problem...I know 
  that most mail services embed the attachments in the 2nd MIME part, 
  but I think that's because even if you don't include any body text, 
  they stick in that dumb advertising in the body of the 
 message, thus 
  forcing the attachment into MIME part #2.
  
  They are telling me to call PSS about this...but I hesitate 
 to do so 
  because stuff like this inevitably winds up being a PMDF 
 screw up or 
  misconfiguration (in case you haven't figured it out by now, I hate 
  PMDF).
  
  Latest version of Trend Scanmail for Exchange 2000 is installed and 
  running on the Exchange 2000 box.=20
  
  Thanks in advance.
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 _
 List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
 Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
 To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: MIME and Exchange

2002-09-26 Thread Joe Berthiaume

Andrey-

This is an interesting point...i've forwarded it on to the PMDF
guys...the only question I have is, if the encoding were screwed up, why
are only certain files/mail messages getting hung up? 



-Original Message-
From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 4:35 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: MIME and Exchange

If there is no DATA command, how does Exchange ever know that the data
will be MIME or something else? I think there is something else going on
there like different character sets or 7-bit vs 8-bit encoding.

Also is there any way to force that PRDL system to send messages in
UUENCODE?

-Original Message-
From: Joe Berthiaume [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 3:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: MIME and Exchange



Here's the story. We have essentially 2 systems...legacy system running
PMDF mail, and the Windows end running Exchange 2000. Users frequently
send messages, with attachments(simple text files) or bodies full of
text(plain...fixed width), from the legacy end, via PMDF 6.11, to the
Exchange Server ( Windows 2000 sp2, exchange sp2) and the messages are
read with a mix of Outlook 2000 - 2002. 

Recently, some of these mails have not been reaching users inbox in
Outlook. PMDF logs show that the message was sent, but no acknowledgment
was received from Exchange, so PMDF marks it as a failure, and backs off
and tries again later. SMTP logs on the Exchange Server show EHLO, MAIL,
RCPT commands but no DATA or QUIT commands as a successful SMTP
conversation would.

Playing around with it some more resulted in some more data...it's
possible to force PMDF to send the attachment as different MIME parts.
If the attachment comes across as the 2nd MIME part it gets delivered on
Exchange with no problem...but if it's included as the 1st MIME part, it
doesn't come through. Note that the message isn't long...it just has a
lot of columns.(224) sometimes with characters and things like tabs, *,
- or ~'s. If we send just a short message, and short attachment, in the
first MIME part, it comes across...thus leading me to believe that
there's some kind of byte limitation in the first MIME part.

PMDF support, and the PMDF admin here thinks it's Exchange...that it's
in violation of some MIME RFC...I don't know. I can grab one of the
files that won't come over and send it to Exchange from Yahoo, Hotmail,
or AOL (yuck) and it comes over without a problem...I know that most
mail services embed the attachments in the 2nd MIME part, but I think
that's because even if you don't include any body text, they stick in
that dumb advertising in the body of the message, thus forcing the
attachment into MIME part #2.

They are telling me to call PSS about this...but I hesitate to do so
because stuff like this inevitably winds up being a PMDF screw up or
misconfiguration (in case you haven't figured it out by now, I hate
PMDF).

Latest version of Trend Scanmail for Exchange 2000 is installed and
running on the Exchange 2000 box. 

Thanks in advance.


_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

_
List posting FAQ:   http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:   http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]