[FairfieldLife] Re: The Rich Are Staging a Coup This Morning ...a message from Michael Moore
Judy, Here's an article below by Jim Jubak on the 700 billion bailout. He writes a regular column for MSN Money. This level of finance is over my head, so I can't make a judgement, but I think he makes some interesting arguments. I think maybe, that as we are changing from an old kali yuga age to a new age of sat yuga this may be a shake up, a cleansing, a purification that is happening, a wake up call. Suzi Orman says that how we handle our money reflects where we are spiritualy. I think this is true for individuals, households, and nations. She says people first, money second, and things third. I agree. http://tiny.cc/dsWhh --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson nelsonriddle2001@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: snip ++ Did you see the Jon Stewart comparison between the Iraq war and the bailout? Looked like the same boogeyman BS. I didn't watch it, but any such comparison is BS, and Stewart should be ashamed of himself for furthering it, IMHO. Moore too. The bailout looks like another part of an ongoing program that has been going on for a long time. N. I'll grant you it *does* look like that, but looks can be deceptive, especially to nonexperts. One of the major differences is that there were very few experts on Iraq back in 2002-2003, so we had to take BushCo's word for it on the basis for the war. But there are a whole lot of experts on the financial markets today. I don't know if anybody has taken a poll of these experts, but there sure are a lot of them who are insisting that the bailout must be passed. Another difference is that those who were against the Iraq war were almost frozen out of media coverage, whereas this time around, there's at least equal coverage of those for and against the bailout, so the public can't help but hear the negative case, which reinforces their own preconceptions. And yet another difference is that we had just gone through a catastrophe at the time the Iraq War was being engineered, and people were scared and angry, ready to believe whatever the administration told them to avert an even bigger one. This time, while the run-up to the catastrophe has been evident for some time, it's been in slow motion, and a lot of it has been behind the scenes. Just as most ordinary people had no reason to expect 9/11, most ordinary people today don't see any reason to expect a sudden and catastrophic financial meltdown. One of the most telling points, it seems to me, is that it was the Republicans in Congress who were most vehemently in favor of the Iraq War. Today, it's the Republicans in Congress who are most vehemently opposed to the bailout, while most Democrats are supporting it (albeit reluctantly). In other words, the apparent similarities between the Iraq War and the bailout are just that, apparent, and only superficial. When you look deeper, they're very different situations.
[FairfieldLife] Global Peace Meditation and Prayer Day May 20, 2007
Join in the Global Peace Meditation and Prayer Day today. Meditate or pray for 15 to 30 minutes. Pacific time: 2:00 pm Chicago time: 4:00 pm New York time: 5:00 pm http://www.globalpeacemeditationprayerday.org http://worldpeace.org
[FairfieldLife] test
test To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Our future is being drugged away
Thanks for posting this Jeff. My friends child is on ADHD drugs and he is trying to find an alternative. I will forward this article to him. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jeff Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Testimony to the State of Georgia Senate Re: Senate Bill 430TeenScreen by Fred A. Baughman Jr., MD August 16, 2006 Whether you speak of teen-screen, infant-screen, toddler-screen or elder-screen (they are all on their way to the nearest school), there is one thing you need to know about psychiatric diagnosis: there is no such thing as a psychiatric disorder, disease, or, chemical imbalance. And yet, psychiatry, Big Pharma, the House, Senate and White House, drunk on money and power, insist that all psychiatric diagnoses are diseases which must be treated, if even by court order; if even they have to call you a negligent parent and make the court your child's parent. We continue to accept the chemical imbalance lie at our own peril. Infinite damage has already been done. Think Columbine, think Conyers, Georgia, where T.J. Solomon shot six, think Haditha, Iraq, and think of the Armed Forces recruiting shortfalls due to the burgeoning psychiatric epidemic in the nation's schools. Think of the accumulative toll of our believing in this brazen, Machiavellian, lie. Think of a child in your own family (like classrooms, every family has oneor more). In 1948, psychiatry and neurology were made into separate specialtiesneurology, my specialty, to diagnose and treat actual diseases of the brain; psychiatry to address the emotional and behavioral (psychological) problems in normals, and, in the physically ill as wellnone of them diseases. [1] In the fifties, chlorpromazine/Thorazine, the first antipsychotic drug was synthesized. Other psychotropic drugs followed. Today, 91% of children who see a child psychiatrist are put on a drug, 18% - -most of them normal--on a dangerous, deadly, antipsychotic. In 1960, when I graduated from the NYU School of Medicine, no such thing as a psychiatric disease existed. In 1963 when I was the first to analyze the chromosomes of cancer cells from the spinal fluid [2] and in 1969 when I was the first to describe glioma-polyposis syndrome (another word for disease) [3] there was still no such thing as a psychiatric diseasea disease being a demonstrable macroscopic, microscopic, or chemical abnormalitiesa palpable or visible tumor, a positive Pap smear or biopsy, or, an elevated blood sugar as in diabetes mellitus or phenylalanine level, in PKU. Little did I know that Psychiatry, Big Pharma and the Federal Government were well along with their big lie, marketplace strategy--to tell the publicall patients at one time or another, that emotional and behavioral problems were not due to their upbringing, environment, circumstances, but thateureka!--they were disorders/ diseases/ abnormalities /chemical imbalances of the brain, each needing, or requiring, a chemical balancer--pill. On September 29, 1970, Representative Cornelius Gallagher of New Jersey launched the Congressional hearing, Federal Involvement in the Use of Behavior Modification Drugs on Grammar School Children: Behavior Modification Drugs in School Children, saying: I have received letters critical of minimal brain dysfunction, one of thirty-eight names attached to this condition. But, clearly, the chemical imbalance strategy was in place. Dr. Ronald Lipman, Chief of the Clinical Studies Section, FDA, testified: hyperkinesis is a medical syndrome. It should be properly diagnosed by a medical doctor. In the DSM-III of 1980 it was ADD; in the DSM-III-R of 1987, ADHD; in the DSM-IV of 1994, it was ADHD of another sort. No science to get in the way. On December 22, 1994, Paul Leber, MD, Director, Division of Neuropharmacological Drug Products of the FDA, wrote to me: no distinct pathophysiology for the disorder (ADHD) has been delineated. On May, 13, 1998, F. Xavier Castellanos of the NIMH wrote to me: we have not yet met the burden of demonstrating the specific pathophysiology that we believe underlies this condition. At the November 16-18, 1998 Consensus Conference, William B Carey [4], speaking on the subject: Is ADHD a Valid Disorder? concluded: What is described as ADHD in the United States appears to be a set of normal behavioral variations... James M. Swanson and F. Xavier Castellanos [5] reviewed the structural/anatomic MRI research [5-18] concluding: ADHD subjects have on-average 10% brain atrophy. From a floor microphone I (Baughman) challenged Swanson: Why didn't you mention that virtually all of the ADHD subjects were on stimulant (Ritalin, Dexedrine, Adderall) therapy and that this is the likely cause of their brain atrophy? With their main line of evidence
[FairfieldLife] Re: Lalitha Sahasranam posted on-line
Which way does the Kamakshi Devi temple face? Is it proper vastu? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, benjaminccollins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have some recordings of Lalith Sahasranam which I will post on www.puja.net so anyone who wants them can download for free. I think I also have a transliteration and translation which I will also post in case you are interested. The links will be towards the bottom of the main page. Interestingly enough the site where Agastya-rishi was given this knowledge by Varaha is the Varadaraja Temple in Kanchipuram southeast of Madras. The temple is literally across the street from the place where my puja.net yagya group has our monthly yagyas. Inside the temple walls is the 2nd largest Vishnu temple in all of India. The temple has a large water pond in the middle of which is a special temple for a form of Vishnu that is kept in a special sealed box under the water and only taken out for pujas every 30 years! As an aside all of the temples in Kanchipuram face the main temple in the area, the Kamakshi Devi temple. So there are many many south facing temples. (so much for vastu!) Regards, Ben Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM ~- To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: A message from Bevan Morris: Maharishi on cell phones
Experiments have shown that the antenna radiation travels up the wire ear- piece cord to the ear-piece at the head. An ear-piece with an air-tube to the ear-piece at the head prevents the radiation from traveling up the wire cord and being radiated at the head. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Faculty and Ideal Administrators: multi snips I think we should have cell phones only as an emergency device, and not use them as a regular way of talking and working. Even for emergency use, it's best to use cell phones with speakers in them that can be held away from the head, or using a plastic air-tube and ear-piece, which do not contain metal conductors and which also allow the cell phone to be distanced from the head. I don't have a problem with the possibility that cellphones may pose a microwave radiation hazard, but I think Bevan is a little shaky on the concept: it's the transmitter/antenna that broadcasts the radiation, not the speakers, and it does not make any difference whether metal parts that are not transmitters are close to the head, as they would not be conducting the radiation: CellAntenna Corporation, a leading provider of solutions that solve cellular communication problems, today announced the potential health benefits of its external cellular antenna products. According to Howard Melamed, CEO of CellAntenna Corporation, external cellular antennas drastically decrease the cellular phones level of microwave radiation absorbed by the human body when used properly. Studies examining the health effects of prolonged exposure to cellular phone electromagnetic radiation (EMR) have been inconclusive or have produced mixed results. But the reality is that cellular phones emit microwave signals that are partially absorbed by the body as users make and receive calls on cellular phones. The radiation level produced by cellular phones is exacerbated by environmental interference and sparse cellular signals, as phones are engineered to operate at full power while in areas with a limited cellular signal. Cell phone users can route the cellular radiation away by installing an external antenna that connects to their cell phone via an adapter. The antenna is then placed at a distance away from them. Additionally, external antennas reduce the radiation power output level of cell phones by helping them relay their signals more efficiently to the nearest cellular towers. Having lower power output has the added effect of lowering battery power consumption and increasing talk time. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM ~- To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
