[FairfieldLife] Re: Running through walls to Michael J

2013-03-17 Thread hopintopin
Re: DrDumbAss Comment: TM is not the static believerism you make it out to be. 
You have NO IDEA about the techniques#39; long term effects because you quit 
doing it, decades ago. 

The long term effects of TM or any other technique for enlightenment are only 
from the karma already released. There are no other long term effects other 
than psychological conditioning. Karma is released while one is doing whatever 
technique is employed, but ceases to be released when the technique is stopped. 
I know all or part of seven different paths to enlightenment, but practiced TM 
very regularly for over 17 years. I found the path that I believe is the 
fastest and most complete, but it was an offshoot from first, Elizabeth Clare 
Prophet's teachings, then Christianity.
   

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote:

 Michael, my memory is probably faulty about this, but didn't you recently say 
 that you still do TM sometimes?  And btw, I'm glad you had such a good 
 childhood, sounds like what many of us had, a mix of happy and unhappy 
 stuff.  OTOH, 30 post in 24 hours?!  And most of it anti TM?!  
 I think this is the kind of posting that makes me wonder if there's more 
 going on for you than simply sharing your opinions.   
 
 
 
 
 
  From: Michael Jackson mjackson74@...
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 9:59 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Running through walls [was Re: Question for TM 
 Cheerleaders]
  
 
   
 that is the difference in you and me (thank God) you believe I quit, I know 
 that I saved myself further brain numbing allegiance to a corrupt man and 
 organization.
 
 
 
 
 
  From: doctordumbass@... doctordumbass@...
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2013 6:28 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Running through walls [was Re: Question for TM 
 Cheerleaders]
  
 
   
 Ha-Ha! Why, did you quit TM prematurely too?? My take on stuff I quit, is 
 that I quit. I definitely don't continue to dig at it, if I am no longer 
 participating. I would never start an argument with someone, arguing against 
 something they did, when I didn't. How incredibly dense. So, yeah, I don't 
 give quitters a lot of credence. 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808  wrote:
 
  
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@  wrote:
  
   You blew it - There is a phenomenon you've probably heard of in long 
   distance running, called, hitting the wall. It means reaching a point 
   of physical depletion, after 15 or so miles, so that the only thing 
   carrying you forward is your knowledge that it is a temporary phase, that 
   can be transcended. But if you are not confident, this is the end of the 
   journey. 
   
   TM is all about continuing to run through imagined walls. Too bad you and 
   Bee are quitters. Now, neither of you will ever know about the eternal 
   benefits of TM. Maybe you should've hung in there a little longer? 
  
  Hmm, you seem to have found yourself a perfect, if ridiculous, way
  to claim to have won any argument about TM:
  
  You only did it for 20 years! What do you know!
  
  Doesn't make much of an advertising slogan though: TM - twenty
  years of running through walls
  
  
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson  wrote:
   
you are an idiot - I did TM for 20 years, twice a day, every day - it 
took me that long to realize it wasn't the only game in town - stupid 
me. 





 From: doctordumbass@ 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, March 6, 2013 9:04 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Question for TM Cheerleaders


  
The only people I see repeating what they were TOLD are you and MJ, 
repeating over and over again, what you TELL yourselves. The thing you 
haven't recognized about TM, *since you don't do it*, is that the 
practice keeps you moving. 

TM is not the static believerism you make it out to be. You have NO 
IDEA about the techniques' long term effects because you quit doing it, 
decades ago. 

So you can fart into the wind all you like, exhorting us all about what 
TM is and isn't. But you are nothing but a quitter sitting on the 
sidelines bitching about it, in my humble opinion.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, navashok  wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb  wrote:
   
My point is that a lot of these discussions are, from
my point of view, falling prey to one of the most 
chronic TM fallacies. People repeat stuff they were 
TOLD -- by the people selling them the 

[FairfieldLife] Re: Blessed are platitude puking Gurus !!! to Steve

2013-03-17 Thread hopintopin
Well, no one else said it, so I am going to. The beautiful century old Gothic 
Chapel(historic landmark)on campus, to which at least one poster referred, was 
torn down. In my opinion, the fact that the chapel was torn down says it all. 
For the hypothetical question of whether or not a Bible study group would be 
allowed: A better question is, would it be attended? To my knowledge, many in 
Fairfield, and some of the posters on this blog, are anti-organized religion. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius 
anartaxius@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote:
 
  Oh Uncle Xeno - why did you get so mad at me? It's love - Uncle Xeno - no
  one will love like Ravi - that's my guarantee.
  
  Remember Gurus will always give you platitudes, will give you beliefs
  because they want approval, following - if there's one thing someone can
  say about my behavior it is that I don't give a damn about anyone's
  approval, it's so sad you can't see that and go on this totally fantasized
  diatribe but it's cute and hilarious.
 
 Ravi,
 
 I am bypassing your self-appointed desk lackey (laughinggull) to communicate 
 directly in my usual cold-hearted and distant fashion. My purpose on being at 
 FFL is to clarify my experience. It would be ludicrous for me to be a guru. I 
 normally do not feel a need to vent my frustrations here, as seems to be a 
 common practice. However if you need asinine platitudes, I suppose I could 
 make up a few for you.
 
 'Those who wash the right sock before the left will be left behind.'
 'Those who wash the left sock before the right will be right behind.'
 
 What percent of the population of India knows what a sock is? It is very 
 important when on the path of enlightenment to keep one's footwear properly 
 organised according to dharmic principles.
 
 And, I was not mad at you. You just always seem to be teetering  on the edge 
 of ... well, whatever the edge is, you always seem to be about to tip off of 
 it. You are a person of dynamic contrasts.
  
  On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius 
  anartaxius@ wrote:
  
   **
  
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, laughinggull108 no_reply@
   wrote:
   
So true and don't either of you forget it! From now on, you have to go
   through me to get to my sweet innocent Baby Krishna Ravi. If you wish to
   respond to Him, you must ask me first. I'll then consult with Him in due
   time to see if He would like to even pursue your line of discussion. If He
   chooses not to, then no reason to even post your comments in the first
   place. A very efficient and effective use of His precious time. And please
   try to remember...
   
   I understand that you, Laughinggull, are now manning the ticket counter
   access to His Presence the Magisterial Royal Mahaswami Ravi Chivukula
   Guruji Mahatmaraja, beneath whom I am not fit to sweep even His Toe Nail
   Clippings. Pray tell upon what condition His Infiniteness might deign to
   drop a few crumbs of His Holy and Benign Darshan in my unworthy direction.
   Perhaps in a moment of His most offhand attention He would feel it barely
   tolerable to pass a kernel of His Most High Wisdom through you to us most
   thirsty and groveling, sycophantic worshipers of His Greatness.
  
   Perhaps you could collect a few grains left over from one of His Chapatis,
   that we could build a shrine to house them and perpetuate their Divine and
   most Humble power.
  

  
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Take two:Everything below is my POV

2013-03-17 Thread hopintopin
@ feste37: Sorry, but this is what people have been complaining about. Those 
in the TMO believe everything they are told. To completely re-roof a building 
the size of the chapel, especially at the time it was supposed to have been 
re-roofed, would not have cost $100,000. Foundation repairs might have cost 
$100,000, but most of the time foundation repairs cost much less than that. 
And, so much upkeep? On a lime stone building? We all know the chapel was 
sacrificed for a new building the DAC wanted there much more than they wanted 
the chapel. Also, about the Catholic Church tear down, even though I am a 
Protestant; I attended the Catholic Church in Fairfield one Sunday back in the 
1980s. The congregation had completely outgrown their facility. It also never 
had the charm and beauty of the campus chapel. In Capital Speak, calling 
people names because they tell the truth is Undignified.
 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues curtisdeltablues@ 
 
 wrote:
 (snip)
  One of the biggest problems of discussing Maharishi's teaching
  with Judy is that she lacks the full context of it because she
  was not trained in it.  She did not sit through the 696 hours
  of instruction including a month devoted to Vedic Studies that
  puts Maharishi's teaching into the context of his religious
  traditions.  But she doesn't know what she doesn't know, so
  she launches into attacks with a skewed perspective that is
  very difficult to sort out when combined with her pugnaciousness.
 
 This is yet another misrepresentation of our discussion by Curtis.
 My only claim has to do with what the rank-and-file is taught.
 That does *not* require sitting through the 696 hours of
 instruction, nor is it a skewed perspective. I've never disputed
 that what is taught to the rank-and-file is not the full context
 of Maharishi's teaching.
 
 (snip)
 (to Ann:)
  I get that you are big fan of Judy, not a fan of Barry, and seem to
  go back and forth with me.  But please stick to what is actually
  being claimed.
 
 IOW, to what *Curtis* is claiming, including his misrepresentations
 of what *I* have claimed.





[FairfieldLife] Re: The New Movement

2013-03-16 Thread hopintopin
However, we still need a way to balance karma (Cosmic Consciousness), or 
eliminate karma entirely (Unity Consciousness). Most of us are not born at the 
tipping point, which is apparent in the case of Eckhart Tolle. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson mjackson74@... wrote:

 I was being facetious of course - in my world view the TMO has had its day - 
 also inmy opinion, the states of awareness that we experience have nothing to 
 do with TM or in fact ANY meditation technique, we are led to believe it and 
 I did for a long long time, but I think that all of the CC, GC, Unity stuff, 
 celestial perception, seeing devas and all the rest are experiences that 
 exist within each of us because it is all within Pure Awareness which is our 
 essential nature - we merely need to get quiet within and feel and observe to 
 begin these experiences.
 
 I know a lot of FFL disagrees, and many of us had TM as that which first 
 began our going within  People like Eckhart Tolle who never meditated a day 
 in his life before he woke up are living proof that you don't need a 
 movement to get you somewhere, but most people have so little confidence in 
 themselves that they think they need a leader or a teacher.
 
 My belief is that Marshy knew that we had all the experiences that one could 
 call alternative states within us and capitalized on the fact by claiming TM 
 was the best way to experience it. The TMO has too much baggage of its own 
 and Marshy's to be of any further value to the world. 
 
 
 
 
 
  From: sound of stillness soundofstillness@...
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2013 2:59 PM
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] The New Movement
  
 
   
 No thoughts, no mantra doesn't exclude the TMO.
 
 Aware-ness, like 'space', doesn't exclude any 'thing' within the space.
 
 Like the space we call a room might include a table, candles, flowers, 
 incense and anything else we might like to add.
 
 Michael
 
 
 
 From : Michael Jackson Sat, 16 Mar 2013 11:40:09 -0700
 
 no thoughts no mantra no TMO 
 
 
 
 From: sound of stillness
 
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Girish Varma accused of sexual harassment - The 
 New Movement - Buck
 
 It think it was in Stephen Cope's book 'Yoga and the Quest for the True Self' 
 that Stephen describes the changes the Kripalu Institute made after it's 
 founder, Amrit Desai, was asked to leave.
 
 Who is the new movement that you mention?
 
 If in the end, we pass the Buck to you, how do you see the new movement 
 unfolding? 
 
 What's the vision bro?
 
 Michael
 
  
 
 From : Buck
 
  This is really a fabulous opportunity for the new movement to come forward 
  and say,We are not that! and put good people in to those facilities with 
  an 
  expectation of good and honorable behavior from the whole movement.  Make 
  it 
  clear.  Make a break from the past.  Even for the guy at the top.
  -Buck





[FairfieldLife] Re: TMO - Part one

2013-03-16 Thread hopintopin
TM is actually only half of the Contemplation Technique. The Contemplation 
Technique requires picturing your deity in your mind while repeating a mantra. 
Picturing your deity - focus - eliminates the spaciness associated with TM. 
While the Contemplation Technique is not quite so charming, it is better for 
effectiveness in activity. The Contemplation Technique is a known 30-40 year 
path. So then the question is: How long is the path for only half of the 
Contemplation Technique - for TM? The path seems to be a least 30-40 years or 
longer. The other question is: Without the other half of the Contemplation 
Technique, does one end up in the same place that one would end, without 
picturing his deity in his mind? If he becomes enlightened, with what does he 
have an affinity? In addition to being only half of the Contemplation 
Technique, unless one follows some other religious instruction to keep himself 
oriented in a righteous direction, it seems that one could become, to quote the 
characters from a popular movie, either Saruman or Gandalf?


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray27 steve.sundur@... wrote:

 
 Is that it?  Is this the great expose?  I think most of this came up the
 second week FFL was live. (-:
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson mjackson74@
 wrote:
 
  If I have not caused many on FFL to despise me, this post
  will go a long way towards that end, not that it is intentional and
 even though
  I am going to have some fun with this, I am writing in a serious vein.
 
  My Description of the TM Movement
  The First Level of the Movement:
  It
  all started with Marshy, a scribe by caste, erroneously or deceitfully
 (take
  your pick) described for years as being from the warrior caste. This
 may have
  been due to white folk not understanding the difference between
 kayastha and kshatriya.
  Marshy
  was a follower of Swami Bramananda, and became his secretary. He was
 told by
  the Swami that he was a businessman and Marshy was no particular
 favorite of
  the Swami, just his scribe. After Swami Bramananda's death, Marshy
 wandered around
  for a while, then began to claim a special relationship with the Swami
 he did
  not have.
  Lying
  from the beginning, he eventually told everyone that Guru Dev, as he
 called the
  Swami, had given him the mantras and the charge to give the knowledge
 of spiritual
  freedom in enlightenment and the means to achieve enlightenment in
 this life to
  the people of the world.
  Marshy's
  wanderings eventually led him to the United States and England. In
 England he
  evidently like the appearance of the British gals who came to learn
 wisdom at
  his feet and began a decades long practice of attempting to seduce the
 ladies
  who came to him for spiritual guidance and enlightenment.
  Marshy
  also became very enamored of money and did all he could to collect as
 much as
  he could get, of course he wanted it to fund his world-wide movement
 which was
  dedicated to the betterment of mankind, tho much of his attention in
 the
  afterhours was devoted to womankind.
  His
  association with the Beatles led to a great deal of unexpected
 publicity which
  he used to the fullest extent possible to gain more converts. In those
 days his
  pitch was: the more people doing TM, the better the world would be. In
 a
  pre-cursor of what would become routine fear mongering with him, he
 made hints
  that nuclear war was a possibility if enough people did not do TM.
  As
  time went by he became more and more manipulative and began to concoct
 wilder
  and more outlandish schemes to defraud people of their money, gain
 their
  personal love and allegiance and for a few decades, get sex from those
 of his
  followers who were willing. Allegations have been made that in the
 times he was
  not successful in seducing women, he sent to India for Indian men to
 satisfy
  his sexual needs.
  Eventually,
  even with all the absurd fantasies he was promoting â€
 enlightenment through TM,
  levitation and other super powers through the TM Sidhi program,
 perfect health
  through his brand of Ayurveda, improvement of life through his brand
 of Indian
  astrology, removal of bad  karma with Hindu sacrifices (yagas),
 he became increasingly
  bizarre as his own set of karmas became manifest when he became
 increasingly
  senile.
 
  Eventually
  he led a Howard Hughes existence, cut off from the world by those who
 had
  everything to lose by revealing his actual mental and medical state.
 And so he
  died, reviled by those who saw through his façade, adored by those
 who
  allowed the Vedic wool to be pulled over their eyes.