[FairfieldLife] Re: Edwards affair cost Hillary the nomination

[film_man_pdx]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5553013&page=1
>

I seriously doubt Edwards "cost" Hillary anything.  He was my first
choice, followed by Obama.  Obama became my first choice when Edwards
didn't make the cut.  One thing I never liked about Hillary was her
tolerance of Bill's pecadillos.  They have a marriage of convenience
and one that they maintain for appearances and power.

When Edwards dropped out of the race and flatly turned down any VP
offering, my wish was for him to be appointed Attorney General.  I
felt he would be formidable in that position.

I also feel a lot of NeoCon trolling of disinformation is going on
this election to seed dissent in the Democratic Party by running up
the flagpole this sort of nonsense.  It all seems to aimed at making
Hillary supporters feels disenfranchised by fellow Dems., and thus, to
jump parties to spite the so called offenders.  Maybe a few will go
with McShame, but I think most will avoid him since he has the power
to overturn Roe v. Wade and send their children home in flag draped boxes.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Edwards affair cost Hillary the nomination

[authfriend]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "boo_lives" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer"  wrote:
> >
> > From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Behalf Of shempmcgurk
> > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 1:56 PM
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Edwards affair cost Hillary the 
nomination
> > 
> >  
> > 
> > http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5553013
> >  &page=1
> > 
> > I doubt it. In my town, Obama was the 2nd choice for most of
> > the people who caucused for Edwards, including me. Obama 
> > probably would have won by a wider margin if Edwards hadn't
> > been in the race.
> >
> Entrance polls in iowa are perfectly clear that Obama was the
> 2nd choice of Edwards voters, not Hillary, by a 2 to 1 margin.
> Exit polls in other states show similar results.  
> 
> This shows the character of the Hillary team - first they
> completely blow the campaign and then they make up lies
> rather than come to terms.

Let's not go overboard here. Only one member of
Hillary's team has made this assertion, and for
all we know he believes it utterly.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Edwards affair cost Hillary the nomination

[boo_lives]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of shempmcgurk
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 1:56 PM
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Edwards affair cost Hillary the nomination
> 
>  
> 
> http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5553013
>  &page=1
> 
> I doubt it. In my town, Obama was the 2nd choice for most of the
people who
> caucused for Edwards, including me. Obama probably would have won by
a wider
> margin if Edwards hadn't been in the race.
>
Entrance polls in iowa are perfectly clear that Obama was the 2nd
choice of Edwards voters, not Hillary, by a 2 to 1 margin.  Exit polls
in other states show similar results.  

This shows the character of the Hillary team - first they completely
blow the campaign and then they make up lies rather than come to terms.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Edwards affair cost Hillary the nomination

[lurkernomore20002000]

"Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> You've got to admit the wind has been at Senator Obama's back...
> 
I believe this may be the most moderate comment you've made about 
Obama. :)

[FairfieldLife] Re: Edwards affair cost Hillary the nomination

[shempmcgurk]

It seems as if Hillary is always being screwed over by philandering 
men...


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I do believe this could be the case.  Of course if you believe that 
> Obama is/was the candidate of destiny, then maybe he would have 
> prevailed anyway.  But if you're Hillary, you've got to be damning  
> your luck.  
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"  
> wrote:
> >
> > http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5553013&page=1
> >
>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Edwards affair cost Hillary the nomination

[Robert]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I do believe this could be the case.  Of course if you believe that 
> Obama is/was the candidate of destiny, then maybe he would have 
> prevailed anyway.  But if you're Hillary, you've got to be damning  
> your luck.  
> 
You've got to admit the wind has been at Senator Obama's back...

It's must be a shame, that the millions of dollars Hillary spent on 
these 'Campaign Advisor'...
And all the advisors were obsessed with Senator Obama, that they 
forgot to check into this story which has been rumored in newsrooms 
since October, 2007...
Silly, Girl!
Hillary, my dear, don't forget me, Hillary my dear...
R.G.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Edwards affair cost Hillary the nomination

[lurkernomore20002000]

I do believe this could be the case.  Of course if you believe that 
Obama is/was the candidate of destiny, then maybe he would have 
prevailed anyway.  But if you're Hillary, you've got to be damning  
your luck.  


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5553013&page=1
>