[FairfieldLife] Re: End the censorship, end the quotas
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On May 8, 2007, at 7:04 AM, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis wrote: > > > Yes shemp, please, leave sooner rather than later. Tom T > > And what would that accomplish? Makes you feel superior in some > way, does it? How do you know others don't feel the same way > about you and your posts? Well put, Sal.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: End the censorship, end the quotas
On May 8, 2007, at 7:04 AM, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis wrote: Yes shemp, please, leave sooner rather than later. Tom T And what would that accomplish? Makes you feel superior in some way, does it? How do you know others don't feel the same way about you and your posts? Sal
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: End the censorship, end the quotas
On May 8, 2007, at 7:04 AM, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis wrote: Yes shemp, please, leave sooner rather than later. Tom T And what would that accomplish? Makes you feel superior in some way, does it? How do you know others don't feel the same way about you and your posts? Sal
[FairfieldLife] Re: End the censorship, end the quotas
Yes shemp, please, leave sooner rather than later. Tom T
RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: End the censorship, end the quotas
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of shempmcgurk Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 11:06 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: End the censorship, end the quotas --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree with alex. If someone blatantly continues to violate concensus > rules, why waste time "administering" to their rudeness. Three strikes > and you are out. Why bother invoking "rules" to get me out, new.morning? If you don't want me here, just have the balls to say it. And if enough people don't want me here, I'll just leave. Well, you're up to 31 posts, so 4 more and you will leave until next Saturday.
[FairfieldLife] Re: End the censorship, end the quotas
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I agree with alex. If someone blatantly continues to violate concensus > rules, why waste time "administering" to their rudeness. Three strikes > and you are out. Why bother invoking "rules" to get me out, new.morning? If you don't want me here, just have the balls to say it. And if enough people don't want me here, I'll just leave. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > By now, every participant of FFL sees that once the 5 post a day > > > rule > > > > > was temporarily lifted that a wave of posting and expression was > > > > > visited upon us. > > > > > > > > > > Forget the 5 post a day rule; forget the 35 post a week rule. > > > > > > > > > > Let's get back to the way it was. Yes, the price that we may > > > have to > > > > > pay is that spairaig may come back to his 50 one-line posts a day > > > but > > > > > all you have to do is invest the 3 seconds it will take you to > > > skim > > > > > over his name in the message list and you're done! > > > > > > > > > > Of course, you'll want to read every single one of MY 50 posts a > > > day > > > > > and you'll want to hang on every word that I write. > > > > > > > > > > I'm precious. > > > > > > > > When Rick put you on moderated status because you refused to abide > > > by > > > > the new rule, I found it annoying to have to keep track of how many > > > > posts per day to approve. And, I fully intend to leave it up to Rick > > > > to count and keep track of people's weekly post counts. Personally, > > > I > > > > would rather there were no posting limit, simply because enforcing > > > it > > > > is a nuisance. But, if there is going to be a limit, it would be my > > > > preference that willful violators be given one warning, and then > > > > booted from FFL if they continue to break the rule. > > > > > > > > > > Fuck you, Adolf. > > > > Grow the hell up you spineless anonymous baby. > > >
[FairfieldLife] Re: End the censorship, end the quotas
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > By now, every participant of FFL sees that once the 5 post a day > > rule > > > > was temporarily lifted that a wave of posting and expression was > > > > visited upon us. > > > > > > > > Forget the 5 post a day rule; forget the 35 post a week rule. > > > > > > > > Let's get back to the way it was. Yes, the price that we may > > have to > > > > pay is that spairaig may come back to his 50 one-line posts a day > > but > > > > all you have to do is invest the 3 seconds it will take you to > > skim > > > > over his name in the message list and you're done! > > > > > > > > Of course, you'll want to read every single one of MY 50 posts a > > day > > > > and you'll want to hang on every word that I write. > > > > > > > > I'm precious. > > > > > > When Rick put you on moderated status because you refused to abide > > by > > > the new rule, I found it annoying to have to keep track of how many > > > posts per day to approve. And, I fully intend to leave it up to Rick > > > to count and keep track of people's weekly post counts. Personally, > > I > > > would rather there were no posting limit, simply because enforcing > > it > > > is a nuisance. But, if there is going to be a limit, it would be my > > > preference that willful violators be given one warning, and then > > > booted from FFL if they continue to break the rule. > > > > > > > Fuck you, Adolf. > > Grow the hell up you spineless anonymous baby. > I may be a "baby"... I'm certainly "anonymous"... I plead guilty to being "spineless"... But HOW DARE YOU tell me to grow up!
[FairfieldLife] Re: End the censorship, end the quotas
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > By now, every participant of FFL sees that once the 5 post a > day > > rule > > > > was temporarily lifted that a wave of posting and expression > was > > > > visited upon us. > > > > > > > > Forget the 5 post a day rule; forget the 35 post a week rule. > > > > > > > > Let's get back to the way it was. Yes, the price that we may > > have to > > > > pay is that spairaig may come back to his 50 one-line posts a > day > > but > > > > all you have to do is invest the 3 seconds it will take you to > > skim > > > > over his name in the message list and you're done! > > > > > > > > Of course, you'll want to read every single one of MY 50 posts > a > > day > > > > and you'll want to hang on every word that I write. > > > > > > > > I'm precious. > > > > > > When Rick put you on moderated status because you refused to > abide > > by > > > the new rule, I found it annoying to have to keep track of how > many > > > posts per day to approve. And, I fully intend to leave it up to > Rick > > > to count and keep track of people's weekly post counts. > Personally, > > I > > > would rather there were no posting limit, simply because > enforcing > > it > > > is a nuisance. But, if there is going to be a limit, it would be > my > > > preference that willful violators be given one warning, and then > > > booted from FFL if they continue to break the rule. > > > > > > > >> Fuck you, Adolf.>> > > Rick, can you ban people for this kind of attack as well please? > > OffWorld > ...hense the use of the word "censorship" in the title. Oh, and fuck you, too, Off World...AND the horse you rode in on.
[FairfieldLife] Re: End the censorship, end the quotas
I agree with alex. If someone blatantly continues to violate concensus rules, why waste time "administering" to their rudeness. Three strikes and you are out. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > By now, every participant of FFL sees that once the 5 post a day > > rule > > > > was temporarily lifted that a wave of posting and expression was > > > > visited upon us. > > > > > > > > Forget the 5 post a day rule; forget the 35 post a week rule. > > > > > > > > Let's get back to the way it was. Yes, the price that we may > > have to > > > > pay is that spairaig may come back to his 50 one-line posts a day > > but > > > > all you have to do is invest the 3 seconds it will take you to > > skim > > > > over his name in the message list and you're done! > > > > > > > > Of course, you'll want to read every single one of MY 50 posts a > > day > > > > and you'll want to hang on every word that I write. > > > > > > > > I'm precious. > > > > > > When Rick put you on moderated status because you refused to abide > > by > > > the new rule, I found it annoying to have to keep track of how many > > > posts per day to approve. And, I fully intend to leave it up to Rick > > > to count and keep track of people's weekly post counts. Personally, > > I > > > would rather there were no posting limit, simply because enforcing > > it > > > is a nuisance. But, if there is going to be a limit, it would be my > > > preference that willful violators be given one warning, and then > > > booted from FFL if they continue to break the rule. > > > > > > > Fuck you, Adolf. > > Grow the hell up you spineless anonymous baby. >
[FairfieldLife] Re: End the censorship, end the quotas
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > wrote: > > > > > > By now, every participant of FFL sees that once the 5 post a day > rule > > > was temporarily lifted that a wave of posting and expression was > > > visited upon us. > > > > > > Forget the 5 post a day rule; forget the 35 post a week rule. > > > > > > Let's get back to the way it was. Yes, the price that we may > have to > > > pay is that spairaig may come back to his 50 one-line posts a day > but > > > all you have to do is invest the 3 seconds it will take you to > skim > > > over his name in the message list and you're done! > > > > > > Of course, you'll want to read every single one of MY 50 posts a > day > > > and you'll want to hang on every word that I write. > > > > > > I'm precious. > > > > When Rick put you on moderated status because you refused to abide > by > > the new rule, I found it annoying to have to keep track of how many > > posts per day to approve. And, I fully intend to leave it up to Rick > > to count and keep track of people's weekly post counts. Personally, > I > > would rather there were no posting limit, simply because enforcing > it > > is a nuisance. But, if there is going to be a limit, it would be my > > preference that willful violators be given one warning, and then > > booted from FFL if they continue to break the rule. > > > > Fuck you, Adolf. Grow the hell up you spineless anonymous baby.
RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: End the censorship, end the quotas
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of off_world_beings Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 6:05 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: End the censorship, end the quotas --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , "Alex Stanley" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , "shempmcgurk" > > wrote: >> Fuck you, Adolf.>> Rick, can you ban people for this kind of attack as well please? OffWorld I could, but the ban gun doesn't have a hair trigger. Seems like someone's always got to play the bad boy. Shemp has taken the baton from Llundrub.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: End the censorship, end the quotas
On May 7, 2007, at 5:47 PM, shempmcgurk wrote: When Rick put you on moderated status because you refused to abide by the new rule, I found it annoying to have to keep track of how many posts per day to approve. And, I fully intend to leave it up to Rick to count and keep track of people's weekly post counts. Personally, I would rather there were no posting limit, simply because enforcing it is a nuisance. But, if there is going to be a limit, it would be my preference that willful violators be given one warning, and then booted from FFL if they continue to break the rule. Fuck you, Adolf. Breaking out into a chorus of: The Way We Were Memories, Like the corners of my mind Misty water-colored memories Of the way we were...
[FairfieldLife] Re: End the censorship, end the quotas
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > wrote: > > > > > > By now, every participant of FFL sees that once the 5 post a day > rule > > > was temporarily lifted that a wave of posting and expression was > > > visited upon us. > > > > > > Forget the 5 post a day rule; forget the 35 post a week rule. > > > > > > Let's get back to the way it was. Yes, the price that we may > have to > > > pay is that spairaig may come back to his 50 one-line posts a day > but > > > all you have to do is invest the 3 seconds it will take you to > skim > > > over his name in the message list and you're done! > > > > > > Of course, you'll want to read every single one of MY 50 posts a > day > > > and you'll want to hang on every word that I write. > > > > > > I'm precious. > > > > When Rick put you on moderated status because you refused to abide > by > > the new rule, I found it annoying to have to keep track of how many > > posts per day to approve. And, I fully intend to leave it up to Rick > > to count and keep track of people's weekly post counts. Personally, > I > > would rather there were no posting limit, simply because enforcing > it > > is a nuisance. But, if there is going to be a limit, it would be my > > preference that willful violators be given one warning, and then > > booted from FFL if they continue to break the rule. > > > >> Fuck you, Adolf.>> Rick, can you ban people for this kind of attack as well please? OffWorld
[FairfieldLife] Re: End the censorship, end the quotas
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > wrote: > > > > By now, every participant of FFL sees that once the 5 post a day rule > > was temporarily lifted that a wave of posting and expression was > > visited upon us. > > > > Forget the 5 post a day rule; forget the 35 post a week rule. > > > > Let's get back to the way it was. Yes, the price that we may have to > > pay is that spairaig may come back to his 50 one-line posts a day but > > all you have to do is invest the 3 seconds it will take you to skim > > over his name in the message list and you're done! > > > > Of course, you'll want to read every single one of MY 50 posts a day > > and you'll want to hang on every word that I write. > > > > I'm precious. > > When Rick put you on moderated status because you refused to abide by > the new rule, I found it annoying to have to keep track of how many > posts per day to approve. And, I fully intend to leave it up to Rick > to count and keep track of people's weekly post counts. Personally, I > would rather there were no posting limit, simply because enforcing it > is a nuisance. But, if there is going to be a limit, it would be my > preference that willful violators be given one warning, and then > booted from FFL if they continue to break the rule. > Fuck you, Adolf.
[FairfieldLife] Re: End the censorship, end the quotas
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > By now, every participant of FFL sees that once the 5 post a day rule > was temporarily lifted that a wave of posting and expression was > visited upon us. > > Forget the 5 post a day rule; forget the 35 post a week rule. > > Let's get back to the way it was. >> Nope. Its great the way it is thanks. OffWorld
[FairfieldLife] Re: End the censorship, end the quotas
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > By now, every participant of FFL sees that once the 5 post a day rule > was temporarily lifted that a wave of posting and expression was > visited upon us. > > Forget the 5 post a day rule; forget the 35 post a week rule. > > Let's get back to the way it was. Yes, the price that we may have to > pay is that spairaig may come back to his 50 one-line posts a day but > all you have to do is invest the 3 seconds it will take you to skim > over his name in the message list and you're done! > > Of course, you'll want to read every single one of MY 50 posts a day > and you'll want to hang on every word that I write. > > I'm precious. When Rick put you on moderated status because you refused to abide by the new rule, I found it annoying to have to keep track of how many posts per day to approve. And, I fully intend to leave it up to Rick to count and keep track of people's weekly post counts. Personally, I would rather there were no posting limit, simply because enforcing it is a nuisance. But, if there is going to be a limit, it would be my preference that willful violators be given one warning, and then booted from FFL if they continue to break the rule.
