[FairfieldLife] RE: Hebrew vs. Sanskrit!
The source of the Sanskrit language is fascinating; "The ancient seers correlated the vibrations (bija) of the cerebral forces (Sahasrara Chakra 7th)with their respective centers (chakras) in the spine. From the seed sounds emitted by the action of these vibrations, the rishis evolved the phonetically perfect Sanskrit alphabet." "In a highly simplified description, it may be said that the fifty letters or sounds of the Sanskrit alphabet are on the petals of the sahasrara and that each alphabetical vibration in turn is connected with a specific petal on the lotuses (chakras) in the spinal centers..." Source, the Bhagavad Gita by Swami Yogananda Ch1vs21. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: At this point I'd say that Hebrew is a more mystical language whereas Sanskrit is a more logical and scientific one!
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Hebrew vs. Sanskrit?
Yep, card but the even more fundamental reason for our poor forecasting scores is our not wanting to be wrong! From: "cardemais...@yahoo.com" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2013 3:58 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Hebrew vs. Sanskrit? FWIW, because us humans seem to be programmed to look for patterns, we are worse at forecasting than e.g. rats: http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/17/forecasting-is-for-the-birds-and-rats/ --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: Card, I sure hope you know about this project: http://www.meru.org/ I met the guy, Stan Tenen, and he's convincing. He says that the projected 2D shadow of the ram's horn (the shofar) can become shaped like the Hebrew letters if you twist it this way and that, AND get this, he told me there's a formula/algorithm that would turn the horn incrementally such that the first chapter of Genesis is produced. Don't know how much to believe, but I'm betting you'd find this stuff very satisfying. Edg --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sharelong60" wrote: > > > Card, sounds like you're saying that because it has more consonants, Sanskrit > is maybe more analytical. I'll add: maybe more left brain dominant? though > that doesn't sound right about Sanskrit. Are you saying that Hebrew is more > right brain, more spatial, softer because of having less consonants? >
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Hebrew vs. Sanskrit?
card, I remember a little of the Sanskrit alphabet. What do you mean when you say that phonetically it is extremely logical? If I'm remembering the sounds progress by simple change in placement of lips, tongue, etc. I guess I'd call it a body based logic rather than an intellect based logic. From: "cardemais...@yahoo.com" To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2013 5:29 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Hebrew vs. Sanskrit? Perhaps more "reveiling" than the number of consonants is the alphabetical order of Hebrew vs. that of Sanskrit. At least phonetically Sanskrit alphabet is nothing short of extremely logical whereas that of Hebrew seems rather haphazard like the Latin and Greek alphabet...??? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sharelong60" wrote: > > > Card, sounds like you're saying that because it has more consonants, Sanskrit > is maybe more analytical. I'll add: maybe more left brain dominant? though > that doesn't sound right about Sanskrit. Are you saying that Hebrew is more > right brain, more spatial, softer because of having less consonants? >
[FairfieldLife] RE: Hebrew vs. Sanskrit?
[FairfieldLife] RE: Hebrew vs. Sanskrit?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hebrew vs. Sanskrit?
Card, I sure hope you know about this project: http://www.meru.org/ I met the guy, Stan Tenen, and he's convincing. He says that the projected 2D shadow of the ram's horn (the shofar) can become shaped like the Hebrew letters if you twist it this way and that, AND get this, he told me there's a formula/algorithm that would turn the horn incrementally such that the first chapter of Genesis is produced. Don't know how much to believe, but I'm betting you'd find this stuff very satisfying. Edg --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sharelong60" wrote: > > > Card, sounds like you're saying that because it has more consonants, Sanskrit > is maybe more analytical. I'll add: maybe more left brain dominant? though > that doesn't sound right about Sanskrit. Are you saying that Hebrew is more > right brain, more spatial, softer because of having less consonants? >
[FairfieldLife] Re: Hebrew vs. Sanskrit?
Card, sounds like you're saying that because it has more consonants, Sanskrit is maybe more analytical. I'll add: maybe more left brain dominant? though that doesn't sound right about Sanskrit. Are you saying that Hebrew is more right brain, more spatial, softer because of having less consonants?