[FairfieldLife] Re: Just to show I'm not the only one to comment on her photos...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_re...@... wrote: snip All readers: Please consider that the piece is once again presented to your minds, because it was mindfully sought for for just such a reason by the poster -- to present it to you. He put this again into your minds. Consider that the piece had to be unholy ripped from its resting place, and by a vile intent has it been thus unearthed. Consider that this creepy zombie piece is now enlivened by the poster's shakti with an intent to maraud this place of discourse with a purposeful besmirching of our atmosphere. Consider that this text-zombie was puppeteered by the poster to deliver an energy of malevolence at two targeted persons but equally delivered the energy to you other readers also. snip --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_reply@ wrote: snip Edg's response went over the edge. He may have felt goaded, but his post is ugly. I've been pondering this tactic of Barry's with some bemusement. Edg's correct that it was intended to upset both Edg and me, but what leaves me scratching my head is that at the time he wrote his comments on my photo, Edg assumed they would wound me deeply; and Barry figured the repost would rip the scab off the wound. He's done his damndest to inflict such wounds on me himself many times in the past. Er, no, sorry, guys. I haven't been insecure about my appearance since I was an adolescent. Even if I thought Edg and Barry really did find my photo repulsive, enough men (more than my share, in fact) have found me attractive (and still do) that it wouldn't bother me in the slightest that there were exceptions. Chacun a son gout, and all that. What's so interesting is that both Edg and Barry are convinced that a woman's sense of self-worth is heavily dependent on how men regard her looks. That can only be because they themselves value women based on their physical attractiveness. I'm not a good test case, as it happens. If I were genuinely unattractive, I might well be sensitive about it. If I were psychologically insecure, I might be sensitive about my looks even though I'm not unattractive. But I'm neither unattractive nor psychologically insecure, so all the energy that Edg and Barry have put into trying to make me feel bad about myself has actually only reflected badly on them.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Just to show I'm not the only one to comment on her photos...
It seems no one notices the country is going down the drain and, maybe that is why. No one cares? lurkernomore wrote: Maybe people are happy to not wake up everyday hearing about the war on terror. So, you just had to mention the war on terror once again this morning? LOL! Maybe the people are relieved to not have to hear each day that we have not been attacked due to great leadership of Dick Cheney and George Bush. Please tell me how the country is going down the drain. Cite a few examples, or how now, all of the sudden we are going down the drain. Here's a quote I hear recently. Wall Steet owns the upside. The taxpayer owns the downside
[FairfieldLife] Re: Just to show I'm not the only one to comment on her photos...
Judy, Hmmm, Ruth called my post ugly, and I think she nailed it. And I admitted that I gave myself permission to be as mean as Godzilla making a Bambi pancake. In other words, I wasn't even talking about your picture at all -- just pretending to do that and riffing in a vile low vibe. To me a woman's looks change by the thought. Bam, bam, bam, she's ugly, she's sexy, she's kind, she's evil, and on and on it goes. I think this is what keeps men from looking for very long into their faces -- they are all Mother Divine I tells ya, and whole worlds scintillate before their inner ken like motes suspended in rays of light. It makes men shit their pants. Hard enough to please one's employer every day, what chance to a Sat Yuga Goddess with a Kali Yuga man's personality? Yeah, I think all men are built to look first and feel later and to judge the book by the cover, but, if a guy is really looking for a partner (rare,) the woman's looks only allure until she says the first word, then all bets are off. The most beautiful babe can be a psychic black hole, and that energy cannot be as easily disguised as a pimple being covered by makeup. If a guy's merely looking for sex, then he can pretty much stop paying attention to energy, and the lady is beautiful all night long. My post's energy was, I thought at the time, an appropriate echoing of your energy when you scoured me in a personal attack. I often feel you nuke others instead of chide them in a friendly banterly way, and I still scratch my head when you do this to a newbie who's come here to try to get some sort of merit badge. That blasting-while-also-correcting is certain to scare away tons of folks who don't have the ego strength to hang here for their intellectual betterment. Shit, I barely have the strength. When Ruth said the word ugly, it wasn't a paper cut to me. Ruth's heart counts. But your blasts equally are as sure to hurt others as much as Ruth's well aimed arrows. Tell me why I shouldn't conclude that you're always trying to thin the herd here. The physician desires disease, and Judy desires incorrectitudes; seems to me, you'd want a lot more dunderheads, blowhards, and crocked cocks here in order to be sure that the entire spectrum of nonsense can be displayed and that your creative intelligence will have easy pickings. Not to say that I alone am not enough to keep you typing all day long, but that you might enjoy your job here more if you didn't have the same old grind of See Barry, stomp Barry, grind Berry, make Barry bread from Barry bones. Seriously, if we had another pompous asshole with no ability to see himself as others do, would that be refreshing to you? For the record, I can point to no post of yours that would be proof that you, Judy, have a lousy life due to your blasting others in real life. Just as others here do not know me, not really, I cannot know you, not really. Almost all accusations here are doomed to ultimately be close to 100% projection. Do you agree? I bet you don't. I bet you think you could identify Barry from an audio only recording of ten conversations of tourists overheard in a Spanish cafe like spotting a guy in a police lineup with a burglar's mask still being worn. I don't have such certainty. The Barry we see here is too haughty to be much of a success in the real world, so, I'm guessing he's got some very nice and proper masks that he can don, but we won't see them worn here, eh? Nab, different story maybe, but in general I think most posters hold back huge hunks of what they are. Judging Barry is definitely hunting elephants with a woodsman's axe because they're so tree-like donchaknow. Glad to hear my darts didn't hit any tender spots over there, but damned if I didn't think I was doing a SWAT attack. For a moment, I swear I was Bruce Willis reloading in mid-air while spinning like a top and mowing down the surrounding hoard of world class evil creeps. Not that you're a world class evil creep, mind you, just that I felt that way while shooting from the hip. Ah, coffee and a nearby mirror start my day. Edg --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@ wrote: snip All readers: Please consider that the piece is once again presented to your minds, because it was mindfully sought for for just such a reason by the poster -- to present it to you. He put this again into your minds. Consider that the piece had to be unholy ripped from its resting place, and by a vile intent has it been thus unearthed. Consider that this creepy zombie piece is now enlivened by the poster's shakti with an intent to maraud this place of discourse with a purposeful besmirching of our atmosphere. Consider that this text-zombie was puppeteered by the poster to deliver an energy of malevolence at two targeted persons but equally delivered the energy to you other readers also. snip
[FairfieldLife] Re: Just to show I'm not the only one to comment on her photos...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_re...@... wrote: Judy, Hmmm, Ruth called my post ugly, and I think she nailed it. And I admitted that I gave myself permission to be as mean as Godzilla making a Bambi pancake. In other words, I wasn't even talking about your picture at all -- just pretending to do that and riffing in a vile low vibe. I thought that might be the case. But it was a really stupid thing to do. It made you look terrible and didn't touch me at all. snip My post's energy was, I thought at the time, an appropriate echoing of your energy when you scoured me in a personal attack. Oh, please. Go back and reread the thread. You made a total ass of yourself from the start, well before I joined it. You freaked out at me because you asked for a general vote on whether you or do.rflex was the bigger liar and fuckhead, and I voted for you. (That was after you had threatened him with a lawsuit.) (Some really interesting comments from do.rflex about Barry and from Barry about do.rflex, as well as from Edg about Barry and Barry about Edg. Fascinating how alliances change. The thread was titled Time to vote -- Who's a bigger liar and fuckhead? John or Edg? back in August 2007.) snip I often feel you nuke others instead of chide them in a friendly banterly way, and I still scratch my head when you do this to a newbie who's come here to try to get some sort of merit badge. Yeah? When, exactly, have I ever done that? snip Seriously, if we had another pompous asshole with no ability to see himself as others do, would that be refreshing to you? God, no. Taking on assholes is a very poor second- best to having intelligent discussions with decent human beans. Almost all accusations here are doomed to ultimately be close to 100% projection. Do you agree? I bet you don't. Projection in what sense? Anybody who assumes how people behave here reflects how they behave in real life is deluded. But characterizing how people behave here is no more likely to be projection than characterizing how they behave in real life if one *knows* them in real life.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Just to show I'm not the only one to comment on her photos...
I wasn't even talking about your picture at all... Judy wrote: You made a total ass of yourself... It's just normal trollish activity. Barry and John are just trolling. Barry once tried to 'out me' by publishing my real name on the internet, not realizing I had already posted under my real name. John once trolled to my place of employ and copied a photo of me. Just today John copied a photo of me from my Yahoo! profile. Can you believe that? http://profiles.yahoo.com/WillyTex But the vibe I get from Edg is downright mean - he just seems to want to start a fight with people. Edg seems really prone to outbursts. I shut him up real quick though - now he won't even speak to me, and that's probably a good thing - no telling what he might do next!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Just to show I'm not the only one to comment on her photos...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000 steve.sun...@... wrote: , Nelson nelsonriddle2001@ wrote: It seems no one notices the country is going down the drain and, maybe that is why. No one cares? Maybe people are happy to not wake up everyday hearing about the war on terror. Maybe the people are relieved to not have to hear each day that we have not been attacked due to great leadership of Dick Cheney and George Bush. Please tell me how the country is going down the drain. Cite a few examples, or how now, all of the sudden we are going down the drain. Here's a quote I hear recently. Wall Steet owns the upside. The taxpayer owns the downside I am not happy to see continuing efforts to pass legislation that is eroding our freedoms.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Just to show I'm not the only one to comment on her photos...
Barry REALLY, REALLY, REALLY, *REALLY* doesn't like to be laughed at... --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote: Here are the two photos that she chose to represent herself on this forum: Oopsie. Barry, the computer expert, couldn't manage to get more than a small piece of the top of the second photo to show up in his post, nor did any of his commentary or his quote from Edg's old post appear, at least on the Web site. Not being a computer expert like Barry, I don't know how to get even a piece of a photo into a post, but here's the URL for the one that *wasn't* making fun of him--the one he, er, scalped (Freudian, much?): http://tinyurl.com/nmb3xh This was my response at the time, BTW, to Edg's remarks on the photo: - Only three possibilities here that I can see: (1) There's something badly wrong either with your monitor or your eyes. (2) You're hallucinating. (3) You've been looking at the photo I posted called Barry's fantasy image of Judy. - snip Let's hear what *he* has to say (as badly formatted as ever) about Ms. Stein's appearance, and what it might say about the karma of the life she has chosen to live: What *Edg's* commentary on my appearance might say about *my* karma?? I think you miswrote, Barry. Try to calm down, then have another go.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Just to show I'm not the only one to comment on her photos...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote: I ask you...is there an appreciable difference between the two photos? Of course. One is making a face, the other is smiling. What is the purpose of your post? Nothing good that I can see. If you feel that there is, please con- sider the words of the poster to this forum whom Raunchydog and enlightened_dawn11 and others have referred to as a great writer. Let's hear what *he* has to say (as badly formatted as ever) about Ms. Stein's appearance, and what it might say about the karma of the life she has chosen to live: Edg's response went over the edge. He may have felt goaded, but his post is ugly. Is the purpose of this forum just to spew at each other, showing how unenlightened we are? Does anyone feel good after any of these exchanges? I hope not.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Just to show I'm not the only one to comment on her photos...
Ruth, Ruth, Ruth, Hey, that was one fine piece of when angry, destroy Rome writing if I do say so myself. Now, with time passed, and with Judy not recently having nailed my hide to some door, I find my resonance with the piece has diminished. I don't personally need to revisit my reasons for writing the piece. Who was I back then? I'm so over him. You? Now this new guy I'm settling into, he's one slippery narcissistic but fucking humble stumbling old schooler who ignores that the root word of Dude! is dud, but who's nonetheless trying to surf the gelling-into-a-new-person processing like it was the last frothing of a wave. Stay tuned, I might lock into another temporary norm any nanosecond. (Marek, do you feel you personality gel when you once again hit the beach?) But, yeah, Ruthy, I'm sorry, but yeah, it was a Sherman's March piece -- no prisoners taken. I gave myself permission to run one mean fucking brutal spirit. That done, done. But ya never know what you are until ya wuz it. Another mask for the back of the closet that I don't particularly want to wear again. I do feel Judy has a chip on her shoulder, and that folks like me do seem to automatically take a whack at it, and then she has a reason to launch her nukes. Her type of skills can easily drive wedges into the armor of just the sort of person I present here, and so, it probably is impossible for her to restrain from correcting moi. I do think she's the titchiest type who unfortunately is also the fastest leather slapping gunslinger here. I don't think she knows when she's picking a fight, and so she is truthfully reporting that she's merely reacting to someone else's attack in both degree and kind. That she attempts to nuke may be a measure of how injured she is feeling on the her side of the keyboard if she's asserting that she merely giving a bit-o-tit for a lotta-rat-a-tat-tat. Who gets up each day to do what she does if not one in great pain? I know pain, and it'll do that to ya; ergo the piece in question. All readers: Please consider that the piece is once again presented to your minds, because it was mindfully sought for for just such a reason by the poster -- to present it to you. He put this again into your minds. Consider that the piece had to be unholy ripped from its resting place, and by a vile intent has it been thus unearthed. Consider that this creepy zombie piece is now enlivened by the poster's shakti with an intent to maraud this place of discourse with a purposeful besmirching of our atmosphere. Consider that this text-zombie was puppeteered by the poster to deliver an energy of malevolence at two targeted persons but equally delivered the energy to you other readers also. Consider that I wrote the piece from an situation of immediacy and emotional rushing, and that the poster has put it before you with all the calculation and psychopathic perversion of a stone cold mafioso hit man. Your peace of mind just got two bullets in the head and one in the heart by someone born blind to the color pain. You might consider these things. Edg PS Anyone here having trouble with how this text appears in your email reader? I'm no longer listening to the one complainer, so if others here would really really really like me to somehow find a way to get my text to wrap to fit your screen, let me know. I do all composing online in Yahoo's form. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity no_re...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: I ask you...is there an appreciable difference between the two photos? Of course. One is making a face, the other is smiling. What is the purpose of your post? Nothing good that I can see. If you feel that there is, please con- sider the words of the poster to this forum whom Raunchydog and enlightened_dawn11 and others have referred to as a great writer. Let's hear what *he* has to say (as badly formatted as ever) about Ms. Stein's appearance, and what it might say about the karma of the life she has chosen to live: Edg's response went over the edge. He may have felt goaded, but his post is ugly. Is the purpose of this forum just to spew at each other, showing how unenlightened we are? Does anyone feel good after any of these exchanges? I hope not.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Just to show I'm not the only one to comment on her photos...
Edg wrote: snip That she attempts to nuke may be a measure of how injured she is feeling on the her side of the keyboard if she's asserting that she merely giving a bit-o-tit for a lotta- rat-a-tat-tat. Who gets up each day to do what she does if not one in great pain? One who *isn't* in great pain, actually. What a weird question.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Just to show I'm not the only one to comment on her photos...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote: Edg wrote: snip That she attempts to nuke may be a measure of how injured she is feeling on the her side of the keyboard if she's asserting that she merely giving a bit-o-tit for a lotta- rat-a-tat-tat. Who gets up each day to do what she does if not one in great pain? One who *isn't* in great pain, actually. What a weird question. Much of the recent posting looks weird from the viewpoint of any practical use. It seems no one notices the country is going down the drain and, maybe that is why. No one cares?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Just to show I'm not the only one to comment on her photos...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson nelsonriddle2...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: Edg wrote: snip That she attempts to nuke may be a measure of how injured she is feeling on the her side of the keyboard if she's asserting that she merely giving a bit-o-tit for a lotta- rat-a-tat-tat. Who gets up each day to do what she does if not one in great pain? One who *isn't* in great pain, actually. What a weird question. Much of the recent posting looks weird from the viewpoint of any practical use. It seems no one notices the country is going down the drain and, maybe that is why. No one cares? Well, I doubt that would be what's sent Barry off his rocker. As to the country, I've been following it pretty closely. Looks to me as if it ain't in good shape, but not in down-the-drain territory. Except for California, maybe...
[FairfieldLife] Re: Just to show I'm not the only one to comment on her photos...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jst...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson nelsonriddle2001@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: Edg wrote: snip That she attempts to nuke may be a measure of how injured she is feeling on the her side of the keyboard if she's asserting that she merely giving a bit-o-tit for a lotta- rat-a-tat-tat. Who gets up each day to do what she does if not one in great pain? One who *isn't* in great pain, actually. What a weird question. Much of the recent posting looks weird from the viewpoint of any practical use. It seems no one notices the country is going down the drain and, maybe that is why. No one cares? Well, I doubt that would be what's sent Barry off his rocker. As to the country, I've been following it pretty closely. Looks to me as if it ain't in good shape, but not in down-the-drain territory. Except for California, maybe... Blago didn't get to be ethics chairman so maybe there is hope.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Just to show I'm not the only one to comment on her photos...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson nelsonriddle2...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Nelson nelsonriddle2001@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: Edg wrote: snip That she attempts to nuke may be a measure of how injured she is feeling on the her side of the keyboard if she's asserting that she merely giving a bit-o-tit for a lotta- rat-a-tat-tat. Who gets up each day to do what she does if not one in great pain? One who *isn't* in great pain, actually. What a weird question. Much of the recent posting looks weird from the viewpoint of any practical use. It seems no one notices the country is going down the drain and, maybe that is why. No one cares? Well, I doubt that would be what's sent Barry off his rocker. As to the country, I've been following it pretty closely. Looks to me as if it ain't in good shape, but not in down-the-drain territory. Except for California, maybe... Blago didn't get to be ethics chairman so maybe there is hope. We are hitting some turbulence, people, so please fasten your seat belts... No need to be 'Scared'... We've all been here before, haven't we? Anyway, I'm not sure how good my predictive powers are lately... But, I am getting the feeling that if California, doesn't get it's act together, spiritually, there may be the 'Big/One Earthquake: there sometime in August of this year... R.G.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Just to show I'm not the only one to comment on her photos...
, Nelson nelsonriddle2...@... wrote: It seems no one notices the country is going down the drain and, maybe that is why. No one cares? Maybe people are happy to not wake up everyday hearing about the war on terror. Maybe the people are relieved to not have to hear each day that we have not been attacked due to great leadership of Dick Cheney and George Bush. Please tell me how the country is going down the drain. Cite a few examples, or how now, all of the sudden we are going down the drain. Here's a quote I hear recently. Wall Steet owns the upside. The taxpayer owns the downside
