Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Perfect gig to BW Judy -- writing for the Church of $cientology
Is this the one where Turq was trying to convert and misrepresent me? Anyway, BW, to set the record straight, the sensible positive clique I told Ravi to put me in was the Curtis Susan Steven one. Never mentioned Vaj. Did not include you BW in that clique because have never thought the dumb c remark was positive. Or the least bit funny. And several times mentioned that I was referring to that situation only. Plus that I didn't like cliques and would be independent re all posts and pilings on. Then called fouls on Barry and Judy and Curtis. So, BW, time has already told. But perhaps you're not reading ALL my posts wink wink. From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 8:37 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Perfect gig to Ann for Judy Stein -- writing for the Church of $cientology --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: ... I think what I don't like is gratuitous negativity. Especially the kind that is mean and nasty towards someone else. Like the kind that seemingly pops up out of nowhere and functions merely to keep the negativity flowing. And ironically enough, often it happens here just when things have quieted down! DUH! A noble thought. Now let's see how you follow through on it. I've said what I had to say in my little Intervention riff. I've adopted the fictive voice of others and dared a certain someone to take a week off from dissing those she so habitually feels the need to demonize here on FFL. WHY am I doing this? As a kind of proactive experiment. We who have (ahem) been around FFL longer than you have are by now used to her attempting to restart the demon- izations after a break. Let's see what she -- and others who tend to join her in them -- do this time, shall we? From my side, I will try my best to neither read any- thing she writes, or respond to it. I shall also try to avoid mentioning her at all. I suspect that Curtis will do the same, since that is his current M.O. anyway. He rarely gets involved until after the first brick has been thrown attempting to damage his career as an educator. Vaj is silent for his own reasons, many of which have to do with the renewed presence on this forum of a rather disturbed troll. So...just sayin'...what will happen from *your* side, since you've weighed in above? Will you call *others* on this forum if *they* try to restart the olde bitterness and grudges? Or is that something you only do when those whom you've been taught to assoc- iate with the Curtis-Barry-Vaj troika speak up? I guess only time will tell, eh?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Perfect gig to BW Judy -- writing for the Church of $cientology
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksfAyW5FCwwfeature=related --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: Is this the one where Turq was trying to convert and misrepresent me? Anyway, BW, to set the record straight, the sensible positive clique I told Ravi to put me in was the Curtis Susan Steven one. Never mentioned Vaj. Did not include you BW in that clique because have never thought the dumb c remark was positive. Or the least bit funny. And several times mentioned that I was referring to that situation only. Plus that I didn't like cliques and would be independent re all posts and pilings on. Then called fouls on Barry and Judy and Curtis. So, BW, time has already told. But perhaps you're not reading ALL my posts wink wink. From: turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 8:37 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Perfect gig to Ann for Judy Stein -- writing for the Church of $cientology  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: ... I think what I don't like is gratuitous negativity. Especially the kind that is mean and nasty towards someone else. Like the kind that seemingly pops up out of nowhere and functions merely to keep the negativity flowing. And ironically enough, often it happens here just when things have quieted down! DUH! A noble thought. Now let's see how you follow through on it. I've said what I had to say in my little Intervention riff. I've adopted the fictive voice of others and dared a certain someone to take a week off from dissing those she so habitually feels the need to demonize here on FFL. WHY am I doing this? As a kind of proactive experiment. We who have (ahem) been around FFL longer than you have are by now used to her attempting to restart the demon- izations after a break. Let's see what she -- and others who tend to join her in them -- do this time, shall we? From my side, I will try my best to neither read any- thing she writes, or respond to it. I shall also try to avoid mentioning her at all. I suspect that Curtis will do the same, since that is his current M.O. anyway. He rarely gets involved until after the first brick has been thrown attempting to damage his career as an educator. Vaj is silent for his own reasons, many of which have to do with the renewed presence on this forum of a rather disturbed troll. So...just sayin'...what will happen from *your* side, since you've weighed in above? Will you call *others* on this forum if *they* try to restart the olde bitterness and grudges? Or is that something you only do when those whom you've been taught to assoc- iate with the Curtis-Barry-Vaj troika speak up? I guess only time will tell, eh?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Perfect gig to BW Judy -- writing for the Church of $cientology
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@... wrote: Is this the one where Turq was trying to convert and misrepresent me? Anyway, BW, to set the record straight, the sensible positive clique I told Ravi to put me in was the Curtis Susan Steven one. Never mentioned Vaj. Did not include you BW in that clique because have never thought the dumb c remark was positive. Or the least bit funny. And several times mentioned that I was referring to that situation only. Plus that I didn't like cliques and would be independent re all posts and pilings on. Then called fouls on Barry and Judy and Curtis. So, BW, time has already told. But perhaps you're not reading ALL my posts wink wink. Share, you clearly didn't understand my Time will tell comment, and still don't. Part of what I was referring to is the difference between your *talk*, in which you claim to wish to end all of this petty, Junior-high-school-level nastiness, and your *walk*, in which you are one of the people perpetuating it. What do you think that your ego-need to set the straight DOES? Let's look at the numbers so far this new posting week, shall we? So far, the person we all expected to try to restart last week's juvenile nasty-fest has made five posts attempting to do just that. You have made four on the same subject. So far. You may feel that in so doing you are just defending yourself or setting the record straight, but the bottom line is that you've almost doubled the total number of nasty-fest posts. Have you ever considered walking away from the whole thing, and just *ignoring* the provocations meant to tempt you *into* perpetuating it? The reason that this person is focusing on YOU and no longer on C or myself is that she knows we won't fall for it any more unless she stoops to outright libel. So far, the only people besides yourself who *have* fallen for it this week and piled on the same old nastywagon were Awoe and Robin. Just sayin'...
[FairfieldLife] Re: Perfect gig to BW Judy -- writing for the Church of $cientology
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCU1qQ0cw6U --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long sharelong60@ wrote: Is this the one where Turq was trying to convert and misrepresent me? Anyway, BW, to set the record straight, the sensible positive clique I told Ravi to put me in was the Curtis Susan Steven one. Never mentioned Vaj. Did not include you BW in that clique because have never thought the dumb c remark was positive. Or the least bit funny. And several times mentioned that I was referring to that situation only. Plus that I didn't like cliques and would be independent re all posts and pilings on. Then called fouls on Barry and Judy and Curtis. So, BW, time has already told. But perhaps you're not reading ALL my posts wink wink. Share, you clearly didn't understand my Time will tell comment, and still don't. Part of what I was referring to is the difference between your *talk*, in which you claim to wish to end all of this petty, Junior-high-school-level nastiness, and your *walk*, in which you are one of the people perpetuating it. What do you think that your ego-need to set the straight DOES? Let's look at the numbers so far this new posting week, shall we? So far, the person we all expected to try to restart last week's juvenile nasty-fest has made five posts attempting to do just that. You have made four on the same subject. So far. You may feel that in so doing you are just defending yourself or setting the record straight, but the bottom line is that you've almost doubled the total number of nasty-fest posts. Have you ever considered walking away from the whole thing, and just *ignoring* the provocations meant to tempt you *into* perpetuating it? The reason that this person is focusing on YOU and no longer on C or myself is that she knows we won't fall for it any more unless she stoops to outright libel. So far, the only people besides yourself who *have* fallen for it this week and piled on the same old nastywagon were Awoe and Robin. Just sayin'...
[FairfieldLife] Re: Perfect gig to BW Judy -- writing for the Church of $cientology
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: snip Have you ever considered walking away from the whole thing, and just *ignoring* the provocations meant to tempt you *into* perpetuating it? The reason that this person is focusing on YOU and no longer on C or myself is that she knows we won't fall for it any more unless she stoops to outright libel. No, that isn't true, and Barry knows it isn't true. Curtis and Barry both focused on me plenty in the past week, with no outright libel in sight (at least not on my part). How much I focus on Barry and Curtis and Share in the coming week will depend on how much bullshit they post. Share was up today because she made several bullshit posts aimed at me. Right now I'm addressing a bullshit post of Barry's aimed at me. Curtis has left only one post so far today, so lame it didn't even qualify as bullshit, not worth responding to. Curtis and Barry's bullshit exchange yesterday was dealt with definitively by Robin; Barry's bullshit Open Mike post yesterday was definitively dealt with by Ann and raunchy and Dr. Dumbass and Robin and Ravi, so nothing from Barry or Curtis I needed to deal with. But we'll see what they post tomorrow.
