[FairfieldLife] Re: Steve Martin of Wilmington = Bliss + Am I my experiences?

2008-02-25 Thread amarnath
Nice quotes, Vaj, thanks for posting.

the following is from my intellectual understanding:

The advaitic self-inquiry approach,
which I have heard from Mooji,
would be( roughly ) to realize that since
I see/feel/experience the Bliss,
I cannot be it.
the inquiry would be
Who sees/feels/experiences the Bliss?

This is before full Awakening, during the neti-neti phase.
During this phase, it's helpful to realize that:
'I' am not my experiences.
and ask Who is the experiencer?

After full Awakening, in this phase,
There is nothing but Self !
( which is Awareness, Bliss, God, Love,
whatever ).

In this ?final? phase, I am also my experiences.
But 'I' and 'me' are no longer personal
supposedly and neither is the Bliss
( it's of a different impersonal quality now).

Some who are having experiences
may dispute the latter. I don't know at this point.

This is my  2cents understanding so far.

Santi,
amarnath

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 On Feb 24, 2008, at 12:40 AM, Rick Archer wrote:

  I agree with Amarnath that many people in the movement seem very
  egotistical. Back on my 6-month course, most of the great
  experience guys had huge egos, and were always competing with
each
  other in terms of whose experience was flashiest.

 Here's that quote again :-). You hit that one right on the head:

 Bliss

  Whenever you consider there is bliss, and the objective conditions
for
 bliss occur, if you fall under the control of that by becoming
arrogant
 or conceited, then that will fester as an obstruction to the spiritual
 path. Rather than thinking about what has caused this happiness, which
 most probably is the accumulation of merit or the removal of
 obscurations, as soon as the bliss occurs, you think, ''That's my
 nature. Based on that, you become arrogant or lazy, thinking, Well,
 I've accomplished it. This is the greatest obstacle to the spiritual
 path. This is what creates the realms of deva-gods.

 Oftentimes it is said that people can handle only a little bit of
 felicity, but they can handle a lot of adversity. This is because
 happiness on the spiritual path is the most difficult thing to handle.
 Once it arises, that's where the path stops.

 This does not mean that it is necessary to give it all up. Giving
 up happiness is not the practice. The main point is not to become
 mesmerized by happiness as the end result. You realize that, Ah, now,
 the good quality of this is that I am fortunate, and this is another
 result of the great fortune of the path and the result of the
 accumulation of merit and wholesome deeds. Even more than ever, I will
 carry on with the work at hand to achieve liberation from cyclic
 existence.

 So with more diligence and more courage, you continue listening to
 teachings, contemplating, meditating, and appreciating this precious
 human rebirth.

 --from Meditation, Transformation, and Dream Yoga
 http://www.snowlionpub.com/search.php?isbn=METRDR

 by Venerable Gyatrul Rinpoche, translated by Sangye Khandro and B.
 Alan Wallace
 



[FairfieldLife] Re: Steve Martin of Wilmington = Bliss + Am I

2008-02-25 Thread tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
Amarnath writes snipped:
After full Awakening, in this phase,
There is nothing but Self !
( which is Awareness, Bliss, God, Love,
whatever ).

In this ?final? phase, I am also my experiences.
But 'I' and 'me' are no longer personal
supposedly and neither is the Bliss
( it's of a different impersonal quality now).

Some who are having experiences
may dispute the latter. I don't know at this point.

TomT:
And then after that it goes back to being very personal and highly
intimate as the next phase of some inward and outward flux. The reason
it is now personal again is that the I/me are everywhere I look and
everything that falls in my attention. I am really all of creation. My
point value is all creation and I can know through the point value and
through the totality simultaneously. It has been this way a number of
years and at this point it has not become impersonal again but they
may be a possibility although I can not see how. Tom