[FairfieldLife] Re: The Ron Paul that Ron Paul doesn't want you to know

2007-09-29 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, oneradiantbeing 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The Ron Paul that Ron Paul doesn't want you to know (Greens have 
2nd 
 thoughts) http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-gop/1902088/posts
 
 Georgia Green Party | May 25, 2007 | Richard Searcy
 
 Posted on 09/25/2007 4:28:04 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
 
 Republican Presidential candidate Congressman Ron Paul is making a 
 name for himself by emerging as an antiwar republican in the 2008 
 race for the White House. While those of us who oppose the mindless 
 war in Iraq welcome all voices of opposition, there are some 
 troubling questions arising about Mr. Paul. 
 
 Paul has been consistent in his opposition to the war, but he 
hasn't 
 been very vocal or visible about that opposition. Most Americans 
knew 
 nothing about Mr. Paul before this election season or had no idea 
 that such an animal as an antiwar republican even existed. Where 
was 
 he years ago when his voice of opposition would not only have been 
 more appreciated, it would have been much more beneficial to this 
 nation, before being antiwar was popular and carried far more 
 political risks. 
 
 Being that he's an antiwar republican, which makes him somewhat of 
an 
 anomaly, surely he could have found and exploited opportunities to 
be 
 more vocal and visible with his stance. There were other 
politicians 
 such as, Cynthia McKinney, Paul Wellstone, Dennis Kucinich, Ralph 
 Nader, and others who were known for their opposition to the war. 
Why 
 didn't Mr. Paul stand with any of them? Why didn't he appear at 
 antiwar demonstrations or stand with other non-politicians who were 
 against the war? 

Idiot. He railed against it in Congress before the war, far stronger 
than ANYONE else.

The rest of this rant is like saying Obama is a Muslim 
fundamentalist, and black suprematist.

OffWorld



[FairfieldLife] Re: The Ron Paul that Ron Paul doesn't want you to know

2007-09-29 Thread sgrayatlarge
Zero chance of winning, don't worry David , be happy!

Steve

-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, oneradiantbeing 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The Ron Paul that Ron Paul doesn't want you to know (Greens have 
2nd 
 thoughts) http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-gop/1902088/posts
 
 Georgia Green Party | May 25, 2007 | Richard Searcy
 
 Posted on 09/25/2007 4:28:04 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
 
 Republican Presidential candidate Congressman Ron Paul is making a 
 name for himself by emerging as an antiwar republican in the 2008 
 race for the White House. While those of us who oppose the mindless 
 war in Iraq welcome all voices of opposition, there are some 
 troubling questions arising about Mr. Paul. 
 
 Paul has been consistent in his opposition to the war, but he 
hasn't 
 been very vocal or visible about that opposition. Most Americans 
knew 
 nothing about Mr. Paul before this election season or had no idea 
 that such an animal as an antiwar republican even existed. Where 
was 
 he years ago when his voice of opposition would not only have been 
 more appreciated, it would have been much more beneficial to this 
 nation, before being antiwar was popular and carried far more 
 political risks. 
 
 Being that he's an antiwar republican, which makes him somewhat of 
an 
 anomaly, surely he could have found and exploited opportunities to 
be 
 more vocal and visible with his stance. There were other 
politicians 
 such as, Cynthia McKinney, Paul Wellstone, Dennis Kucinich, Ralph 
 Nader, and others who were known for their opposition to the war. 
Why 
 didn't Mr. Paul stand with any of them? Why didn't he appear at 
 antiwar demonstrations or stand with other non-politicians who were 
 against the war? 
 
 Even more troubling than his obscurity, is his past comments on 
 racial minorities and his association with the John Birch Society. 
 Paul is the only congressperson to receive a 100% approval rating 
 from the Birchers. His MySpace links directly to the John Birch 
 Society. 
 
 He has also been attributed to comments such as these which 
appeared 
 in his newsletter, the Ron Paul Survival Report: 
 
 If you have ever been robbed by a black teen-aged male, you know 
how 
 unbelievably fleet-footed they can be. 
 
 Opinion polls consistently show that only about 5 percent of 
blacks 
 have sensible political opinions, i.e. support the free market, 
 individual liberty and the end of welfare and affirmative action 
 
 Given the inefficiencies of what D.C. laughingly calls the 
`criminal 
 justice system,' I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of 
the 
 black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal 
 
 We don't think a child of 13 should be held responsible as a man 
of 
 23. That's true for most people, but black males age 13 who have 
been 
 raised on the streets and who have joined criminal gangs are as 
big, 
 strong, tough, scary and culpable as any adult and should be 
treated 
 as such. 
 
 We are constantly told that it is evil to be afraid of black men, 
it 
 is hardly irrational. Black men commit murders, rapes, robberies, 
 muggings and burglaries all out of proportion to their numbers. 
 
 He called former U.S. representative Barbara Jordan a fraud and 
 a half-educated victimologist. 
 
 Paul also claimed that former President Bill Clinton not only 
 fathered illegitimate children, but, that he also used cocaine 
 which would explain certain mysteries about the president's 
 scratchy voice. He said, None of this is conclusive, of course, 
but 
 it sure is interesting, When challenged on those remarks he blamed 
 them on an aide that supposedly wrote them for his newsletter over 
a 
 period of years. Are we to assume that he hadn't read his own 
 newsletter? 
 
 His newsletter with his name on it 
 
 When challenged by the NAACP and other civil rights groups for an 
 apology for such racist remarks, Paul simply said that his remarks 
 about Barbara Jordan related to her stands on affirmative action 
and 
 that his written comments about blacks were in the context 
 of current events and statistical reports of the time. He denied 
 any racist intent. 
 
 Lock up black children, only black children, but he meant nothing 
 racist. Sure. 
 
 It isn't just blacks that Paul has a problem with it's also Asians, 
 homosexuals, Jews, women, fornication, gambling, and the stock 
 market. 
 
 I have a 13 year-old nephew and I certainly wouldn't want the 
 President of the United States trying to convince America that he's 
 dangerous simply because he's black and can run fast. 
 
 I believe that the Ron Paul express needs much closer and thorough 
 examination before those who champion his antiwar stance jump on-
 board.