Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Question for Rick
the discussions between Buck and Rick sparked the question and I don't care what you think of me From: awoelfleba...@yahoo.com awoelfleba...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 9:49 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Question for Rick --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Rick, you seem to have found a bit of evidence of Movement shenanigans when it comes at least to money, plus the Movement propensity for covering stuff up like Hagelin's hitting on his students, the recent firing of a faculty member for sexual and financial impropriety, yet you seem quite keen on the Movement's latest efforts to push TM through David Lynch, saying that many people are getting good stuff (meaning I suppose like soldiers learning TM) My question is, with an organization that has shown systemic deceit, and penchant for improprieties, do you think they have just suddenly cleaned up their act, or what? I mean from my point of view, the last many years TM has been primarily a means for making money for M's family and keeping up the big boys like Bevan, keeping their gravy train going. Do you feel they no longer do this, or is it your POV that the people who learn TM now get the good out of it in spite of the shenanigans of the Movement? Sometimes MJ you remind me of some of the women I know who arrive at their hairdresser just drooling to know the latest gossip (or old gossip). There are two groups of people I have come across that know all the juicy stuff: hairdressers and farriers.
RE: [FairfieldLife] RE: Question for Rick
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of awoelfleba...@yahoo.com Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 8:50 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Question for Rick --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com mailto:fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Rick, you seem to have found a bit of evidence of Movement shenanigans when it comes at least to money, plus the Movement propensity for covering stuff up like Hagelin's hitting on his students, the recent firing of a faculty member for sexual and financial impropriety, yet you seem quite keen on the Movement's latest efforts to push TM through David Lynch, saying that many people are getting good stuff (meaning I suppose like soldiers learning TM) My question is, with an organization that has shown systemic deceit, and penchant for improprieties, do you think they have just suddenly cleaned up their act, or what? I mean from my point of view, the last many years TM has been primarily a means for making money for M's family and keeping up the big boys like Bevan, keeping their gravy train going. Do you feel they no longer do this, or is it your POV that the people who learn TM now get the good out of it in spite of the shenanigans of the Movement? Sometimes MJ you remind me of some of the women I know who arrive at their hairdresser just drooling to know the latest gossip (or old gossip). There are two groups of people I have come across that know all the juicy stuff: hairdressers and farriers. I think the organization is multifaceted, not monolithic. It’s not the Aryan Brotherhood or the KKK after all. There have been and are some creeps in the movement (and even they have their good qualities), but despite them (and sometimes because of them) the movement has been and is doing good things. From my vantage point, it’s a lot more positive than negative.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Question for Rick, NICELY ANSWERED RICK, I FULLY AGREE
WELL STATED RICK In a message dated 09/04/13 11:51:53 Eastern Daylight Time, r...@searchsummit.com writes: From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of awoelfleba...@yahoo.com Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 8:50 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Question for Rick --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Rick, you seem to have found a bit of evidence of Movement shenanigans when it comes at least to money, plus the Movement propensity for covering stuff up like Hagelin's hitting on his students, the recent firing of a faculty member for sexual and financial impropriety, yet you seem quite keen on the Movement's latest efforts to push TM through David Lynch, saying that many people are getting good stuff (meaning I suppose like soldiers learning TM) My question is, with an organization that has shown systemic deceit, and penchant for improprieties, do you think they have just suddenly cleaned up their act, or what? I mean from my point of view, the last many years TM has been primarily a means for making money for M's family and keeping up the big boys like Bevan, keeping their gravy train going. Do you feel they no longer do this, or is it your POV that the people who learn TM now get the good out of it in spite of the shenanigans of the Movement? Sometimes MJ you remind me of some of the women I know who arrive at their hairdresser just drooling to know the latest gossip (or old gossip). There are two groups of people I have come across that know all the juicy stuff: hairdressers and farriers. I think the organization is multifaceted, not monolithic. It’s not the Aryan Brotherhood or the KKK after all. There have been and are some creeps in the movement (and even they have their good qualities), but despite them (and sometimes because of them) the movement has been and is doing good things. From my vantage point, it’s a lot more positive than negative.
RE: RE: [FairfieldLife] RE: Question for Rick
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Question for Rick
OK thanks, that's what I was wondering. From: Rick Archer r...@searchsummit.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, September 4, 2013 11:51 AM Subject: RE: [FairfieldLife] RE: Question for Rick From:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of awoelfleba...@yahoo.com Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 8:50 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] RE: Question for Rick --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Rick, you seem to have found a bit of evidence of Movement shenanigans when it comes at least to money, plus the Movement propensity for covering stuff up like Hagelin's hitting on his students, the recent firing of a faculty member for sexual and financial impropriety, yet you seem quite keen on the Movement's latest efforts to push TM through David Lynch, saying that many people are getting good stuff (meaning I suppose like soldiers learning TM) My question is, with an organization that has shown systemic deceit, and penchant for improprieties, do you think they have just suddenly cleaned up their act, or what? I mean from my point of view, the last many years TM has been primarily a means for making money for M's family and keeping up the big boys like Bevan, keeping their gravy train going. Do you feel they no longer do this, or is it your POV that the people who learn TM now get the good out of it in spite of the shenanigans of the Movement? Sometimes MJ you remind me of some of the women I know who arrive at their hairdresser just drooling to know the latest gossip (or old gossip). There are two groups of people I have come across that know all the juicy stuff: hairdressers and farriers. I think the organization is multifaceted, not monolithic. It’s not the Aryan Brotherhood or the KKK after all. There have been and are some creeps in the movement (and even they have their good qualities), but despite them (and sometimes because of them) the movement has been and is doing good things. From my vantage point, it’s a lot more positive than negative.
Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Question for Rick
Aw, don't be sore. I just wish I had more gossip for you. But seeing as I haven't followed what the Movement is doing since 1987 I'm a lousy source.
RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Question for Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Richard M Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 4:45 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Question for Rick Archer It may not be widely publicised - but behind the scenes Google has been waging a vicious and bloody war against Black Hat SEO. This term refers to those very clever and inventive Search Engine Optimizer experts who are forever trying to trick Google so as to get their sites to appear high in the organic listings. (Rick of course is White hat SEO!). They are to search engines what spammers are to email. If it's indeed true that Google are planning to plug the weaknesses in the algorithm with human review, then this suggests that Google could be raising the white flag and giving in, overwhelmed by the bad guys. A great shame. (But then the evidence for this in the article seems a bit weak?) My understanding is that Google's very smart and well-paid Ph.D.'s are always doing searches, seeing what comes up, and then tweaking the algorithm if those results don't effectively fulfill the search queries. But there are so many web sites and so many search terms that they can't possibly manually manipulate a significant percentage of search results. Of course, if they can fairly block a black hat technique, that may sweep many sites off the SERPS (search engine results pages) in one fell swoop. And they have done this many times over the years. That's why it's good to stick with white hat techniques. Go for long-term results, unless you're working with a throw-away domain.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Question for Rick Archer
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 4:44 AM, Richard M compost...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: It IS a huge seismic shift really. If true, (big if maybe) this is as big a shock to us geeks as is the collapse of the banks. Both represent the end of hubris: On the hand that the days of borrowing and boom will never end, and on the other that the computer wizards of Google can achieve near perfect search given a big enough server farm and a clever algorithm. To try to give perspective to those who think of Google as just a software company, let's try to put the scale of Google's server farms into perspective. Google's server farms in the US use more electricity than all of the TVs in the US.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Question for Rick
It's for Driving While Intoxicated which is an old acronym that has mostly been replaced with DUI or Driving Under the Influence. Paul Mason wrote: 'DWI' is not a term we are familiar with in the UK so I had to look it up, googling first gave me 'Drinking Water Inspectorate', then it offered me 'Dance With Intensity', so which one is it? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 3/23/04 9:35 AM, wmurphy77 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Congratulations on this great Newsgroup, just wondering, who is Jennifer, (The one who reported MMY amused at Americans buying all of his 'stuff') and did J. Hagelin, his excellency really have a DWI? Thanks in advance, BillyG. I don¹t think Jennifer wants her last name publicized just yet. She was one of the women whose story is told in the Sexy Sadie file in the Files section of this chat. She¹s now an attorney and head of her own law firm. She sticks by her 32-year-old story. The person who told me about Hagelin¹s DWI was Jay Latham, who is now deceased. He and John were in the same mandatory, remedial DWI classes together over in Ottumwa. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Question for Rick
on 5/9/06 7:02 PM, shempmcgurk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There's MORE than just these two? There are many more. You've read the Sexy Sadie file? How many others and how did you hear about them? I know the names of about 5 others, and have spoken to two of them. I have also heard several detailed accounts of other incidents in which I wasn't told the women's names. All this from 5 or 6 different, independent sources - Maharishi's former secretaries, several friends, etc. I know you've corresponded with some of them...are the ones you corresponded with the Judith and Linda above? No. Other ones. Jennifer is one. Last name withheld. I won't give first or last name of the other. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' SPONSORED LINKS Maharishi university of management Maharishi mahesh yogi Ramana maharshi YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
