Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
Richard, I think the soul enters the body at 3 months. I'm not sure what should be done after that. On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 9:54 PM, 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: On 5/14/2014 4:28 PM, fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: They consider it MURDER. Not just rhetoric; that is how they really see it, as the murder of a child. That is why they are so upset about it. I do not agree, at all, but I certainly see why they become fanatics. At what point does abortion become murder or feticide? In comparison to other developed countries, the procedure is more available in the United States in terms of how late the abortion can legally be performed. This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
On what basis do you think this? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Richard, I think the soul enters the body at 3 months. I'm not sure what should be done after that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
Judy, opening a can of worms, I think this because I heard through the grapevine that Maharishi said it. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 10:53 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: On what basis do you think this? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Richard, I think the soul enters the body at 3 months. I'm not sure what should be done after that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
And he would have known this how, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, opening a can of worms, I think this because I heard through the grapevine that Maharishi said it. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 10:53 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: On what basis do you think this? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Richard, I think the soul enters the body at 3 months. I'm not sure what should be done after that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
Judy, important to repeat that I did not myself hear Maharishi say this. But it makes sense to me and if he did say it, I'd say he got it from an ancient source of wisdom. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:03 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And he would have known this how, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, opening a can of worms, I think this because I heard through the grapevine that Maharishi said it. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 10:53 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: On what basis do you think this? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Richard, I think the soul enters the body at 3 months. I'm not sure what should be done after that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
And where would this ancient source of wisdom have gotten it from, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, important to repeat that I did not myself hear Maharishi say this. But it makes sense to me and if he did say it, I'd say he got it from an ancient source of wisdom. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:03 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And he would have known this how, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, opening a can of worms, I think this because I heard through the grapevine that Maharishi said it. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 10:53 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: On what basis do you think this? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Richard, I think the soul enters the body at 3 months. I'm not sure what should be done after that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
Judy, ancient source of wisdom would get it from wise and ancient women... On Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:25 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And where would this ancient source of wisdom have gotten it from, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, important to repeat that I did not myself hear Maharishi say this. But it makes sense to me and if he did say it, I'd say he got it from an ancient source of wisdom. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:03 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And he would have known this how, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, opening a can of worms, I think this because I heard through the grapevine that Maharishi said it. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 10:53 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: On what basis do you think this? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Richard, I think the soul enters the body at 3 months. I'm not sure what should be done after that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
And these wise and ancient women would have known this how, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, ancient source of wisdom would get it from wise and ancient women... On Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:25 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And where would this ancient source of wisdom have gotten it from, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, important to repeat that I did not myself hear Maharishi say this. But it makes sense to me and if he did say it, I'd say he got it from an ancient source of wisdom. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:03 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And he would have known this how, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, opening a can of worms, I think this because I heard through the grapevine that Maharishi said it. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 10:53 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: On what basis do you think this? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Richard, I think the soul enters the body at 3 months. I'm not sure what should be done after that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
Judy, from their own experience and that of other women they experienced as being mostly accurate in their perceptions and observations. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:33 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And these wise and ancient women would have known this how, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, ancient source of wisdom would get it from wise and ancient women... On Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:25 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And where would this ancient source of wisdom have gotten it from, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, important to repeat that I did not myself hear Maharishi say this. But it makes sense to me and if he did say it, I'd say he got it from an ancient source of wisdom. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:03 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And he would have known this how, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, opening a can of worms, I think this because I heard through the grapevine that Maharishi said it. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 10:53 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: On what basis do you think this? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Richard, I think the soul enters the body at 3 months. I'm not sure what should be done after that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
And they perceived and observed the accuracy of this idea how, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, from their own experience and that of other women they experienced as being mostly accurate in their perceptions and observations. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:33 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And these wise and ancient women would have known this how, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, ancient source of wisdom would get it from wise and ancient women... On Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:25 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And where would this ancient source of wisdom have gotten it from, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, important to repeat that I did not myself hear Maharishi say this. But it makes sense to me and if he did say it, I'd say he got it from an ancient source of wisdom. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:03 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And he would have known this how, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, opening a can of worms, I think this because I heard through the grapevine that Maharishi said it. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 10:53 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: On what basis do you think this? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Richard, I think the soul enters the body at 3 months. I'm not sure what should be done after that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
Souls entering at three months or whenever would be a *religious* consideration. However, a scientific consideration is that life begins when the genetic material is 100% complete and unique(neither mothers nor fathers) and the cells begin to divide. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 9:33 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And these wise and ancient women would have known this how, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, ancient source of wisdom would get it from wise and ancient women... On Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:25 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And where would this ancient source of wisdom have gotten it from, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, important to repeat that I did not myself hear Maharishi say this. But it makes sense to me and if he did say it, I'd say he got it from an ancient source of wisdom. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:03 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And he would have known this how, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, opening a can of worms, I think this because I heard through the grapevine that Maharishi said it. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 10:53 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: On what basis do you think this? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Richard, I think the soul enters the body at 3 months. I'm not sure what should be done after that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
A different scientific consideration would be when the fetus is able to survive as an organism independent of the mother. I believe that that is the criterion the Supreme Court chose to use. L ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mdixon.6569@... wrote : Souls entering at three months or whenever would be a *religious* consideration. However, a scientific consideration is that life begins when the genetic material is 100% complete and unique(neither mothers nor fathers) and the cells begin to divide. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 9:33 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And these wise and ancient women would have known this how, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, ancient source of wisdom would get it from wise and ancient women... On Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:25 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And where would this ancient source of wisdom have gotten it from, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, important to repeat that I did not myself hear Maharishi say this. But it makes sense to me and if he did say it, I'd say he got it from an ancient source of wisdom. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:03 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And he would have known this how, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, opening a can of worms, I think this because I heard through the grapevine that Maharishi said it. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 10:53 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: On what basis do you think this? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Richard, I think the soul enters the body at 3 months. I'm not sure what should be done after that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
That would definitely be more... convenient. Although, it still could be considered murder since it is destroying another* life* which is neither the mother's nor the father's but a completely separate entity, regardless of viability. When cells divide and multiply, there is life and it;s not the mother's DNA that is dividing nor the fathers.It is a unique *life*. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 12:15 PM, lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: A different scientific consideration would be when the fetus is able to survive as an organism independent of the mother. I believe that that is the criterion the Supreme Court chose to use. L ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mdixon.6569@... wrote : Souls entering at three months or whenever would be a *religious* consideration. However, a scientific consideration is that life begins when the genetic material is 100% complete and unique(neither mothers nor fathers) and the cells begin to divide. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 9:33 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And these wise and ancient women would have known this how, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, ancient source of wisdom would get it from wise and ancient women... On Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:25 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And where would this ancient source of wisdom have gotten it from, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, important to repeat that I did not myself hear Maharishi say this. But it makes sense to me and if he did say it, I'd say he got it from an ancient source of wisdom. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:03 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And he would have known this how, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, opening a can of worms, I think this because I heard through the grapevine that Maharishi said it. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 10:53 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: On what basis do you think this? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Richard, I think the soul enters the body at 3 months. I'm not sure what should be done after that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mdixon.6569@... wrote : Souls entering at three months or whenever would be a *religious* consideration. However, a scientific consideration is that life begins when the genetic material is 100% complete and unique(neither mothers nor fathers) and the cells begin to divide. I think the soul is indestructable, for all intents and purposes. If the soul seeks a human body for whatever reason then, if that body is no longer available, there is no harm done to the soul. A body is just a body, it is very fragile and very temporary. If one kills off a body the soul simply flees. So if one were to terminate the life coursing through a physical body does it really matter if a soul is present there or not? Either way you have killed the body, which is miraculous enough in its workings with or without a soul, so that alone is unfortunate on many levels. Souls are renewable in that they seem to be able to come and go and can inhabit and just as quickly vacate the premises. I am not sure the deciding factor for murder or lack of murder is the presence of a soul since that is not destroyed anyway. This is all predicated on the fact that souls even exist and are enduring in some absolute sense. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 9:33 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And these wise and ancient women would have known this how, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, ancient source of wisdom would get it from wise and ancient women... On Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:25 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And where would this ancient source of wisdom have gotten it from, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, important to repeat that I did not myself hear Maharishi say this. But it makes sense to me and if he did say it, I'd say he got it from an ancient source of wisdom. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 11:03 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: And he would have known this how, do you think? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, opening a can of worms, I think this because I heard through the grapevine that Maharishi said it. On Saturday, May 17, 2014 10:53 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: On what basis do you think this? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Richard, I think the soul enters the body at 3 months. I'm not sure what should be done after that.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, LEnglish5@... wrote : A different scientific consideration would be when the fetus is able to survive as an organism independent of the mother. I believe that that is the criterion the Supreme Court chose to use. Maybe another question besides when does an abortion become murder would be when does a conglomeration of cells become a human being. This idea that three months is the cut off point for having committed a real atrocity is based on biology, not on some mystical cognition. At three months a fetus looks like this. L
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
On 5/14/2014 10:54 PM, raunchy...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote : On 5/14/2014 4:28 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... mailto:fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: They consider it MURDER. Not just rhetoric; that is how they really see it, as the murder of a child. That is why they are so upset about it. I do not agree, at all, but I certainly see why they become fanatics. At what point does abortion become murder or feticide? In comparison to other developed countries, the procedure is more available in the United States in terms of how late the abortion can legally be performed. Is that so? Citation and stats, please. Reference: Wikipedia - /Abortion by country./ Go figure. --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
On 5/14/2014 10:52 PM, raunchy...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Sec. Hillary Clinton Defends Reproductive Rights and Family Planning: You failed to answer the question: At what point in the life of the fetus is life viable? And also, should the decision have anything to do with the gender of the fetus? Both of these question have a bearing on the morality of the procedure. I'm thinking 23 weeks. But, I'm not sure about the gender issue - it sounds wrong, but it's common practice in some countries. Go figure. http://youtu.be/UH9rC0MaBJc ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote : On 5/14/2014 4:28 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... mailto:fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: They consider it MURDER. Not just rhetoric; that is how they really see it, as the murder of a child. That is why they are so upset about it. I do not agree, at all, but I certainly see why they become fanatics. At what point does abortion become murder or feticide? In comparison to other developed countries, the procedure is more available in the United States in terms of how late the abortion can legally be performed. --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
Saunders isn't a corporatist, and I certainly would vote for him in a national election. But I would never, ever vote for him in a primary. Lesser of two evils issues are all we CAN get in Presidential races and all we will ever get unless we take a page from the political book of the Religious Right, who have been working to overturn Roe v Wade since the day it started by starting from the very bottom and voting in sympathetic dog catchers and school board members who then run for higher political officer after they establish their political credentials. Moderates and liberals simply don't have the multi-generational fanaticism to play that game, counting on people's better nature, instead. The Religious Right knows that there's no such thing [the Bible told them so], so they always assume the worst about everyone and manipulate, er, act accordingly. L ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog@... wrote : So who isn't a corporatist? Obama? Or didn't you know that when you voted for him?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
I will be more than pleased when that little corporate elitist goes tripping off on his endless love me party cycle, once out of office. Can't wait. Because of his misplaced allegiance, to his second term, he blatantly sold out people like me. I now pay $4k annually, for medical insurance, that does not comply with Obamacare. My Obamacare insurance tripled, and I can no longer afford it ($12k per year!). So, while insured, I am still liable for his ever increasing fines, each year. Nice job, dickhead. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog@... wrote : So who isn't a corporatist? Obama? Or didn't you know that when you voted for him?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
The Obama fellow is all hat no cattle. His non-delivery of promises is no surprise in esoteric circles though, and his Nobel Peace prize is a joke. Seems like the the head of that committee is getting fired next year. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : I will be more than pleased when that little corporate elitist goes tripping off on his endless love me party cycle, once out of office. Can't wait. Because of his misplaced allegiance, to his second term, he blatantly sold out people like me. I now pay $4k annually, for medical insurance, that does not comply with Obamacare. My Obamacare insurance tripled, and I can no longer afford it ($12k per year!). So, while insured, I am still liable for his ever increasing fines, each year. Nice job, dickhead. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog@... wrote : So who isn't a corporatist? Obama? Or didn't you know that when you voted for him?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
Guilty! I voted for the little bastard. Oh well - still better than Scary Mitch and Paul, but I am so tired of voting for the best of the worst. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : The Obama fellow is all hat no cattle. His non-delivery of promises is no surprise in esoteric circles though, and his Nobel Peace prize is a joke. Seems like the the head of that committee is getting fired next year. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : I will be more than pleased when that little corporate elitist goes tripping off on his endless love me party cycle, once out of office. Can't wait. Because of his misplaced allegiance, to his second term, he blatantly sold out people like me. I now pay $4k annually, for medical insurance, that does not comply with Obamacare. My Obamacare insurance tripled, and I can no longer afford it ($12k per year!). So, while insured, I am still liable for his ever increasing fines, each year. Nice job, dickhead. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog@... wrote : So who isn't a corporatist? Obama? Or didn't you know that when you voted for him?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
And she's *brain* damaged! LOL! On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 7:32 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Hillary is just another corporatist candidate. Wake up! On 05/13/2014 05:12 PM, raunchy...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Hillary doesn't need young people to win. They don't vote unless it's for the Messiah. She needs independents, which is looking pretty good for her in the polls. 2016 - 2016 Democratic Presidential Nomination | RealClearPolitics 2016 - 2016 Democratic Presidential Nomination | R... 2016 - 2016 Democratic Presidential Nomination View on www.realclearpoliti...Preview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
If you voted for scary Mitch or Paul you wasted your vote. You should have tried voting for Romney! On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 5:47 AM, fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Guilty! I voted for the little bastard. Oh well - still better than Scary Mitch and Paul, but I am so tired of voting for the best of the worst. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : The Obama fellow is all hat no cattle. His non-delivery of promises is no surprise in esoteric circles though, and his Nobel Peace prize is a joke. Seems like the the head of that committee is getting fired next year. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : I will be more than pleased when that little corporate elitist goes tripping off on his endless love me party cycle, once out of office. Can't wait. Because of his misplaced allegiance, to his second term, he blatantly sold out people like me. I now pay $4k annually, for medical insurance, that does not comply with Obamacare. My Obamacare insurance tripled, and I can no longer afford it ($12k per year!). So, while insured, I am still liable for his ever increasing fines, each year. Nice job, dickhead. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog@... wrote : So who isn't a corporatist? Obama? Or didn't you know that when you voted for him?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
On 5/13/2014 7:12 PM, raunchy...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Hillary doesn't need young people to win. They don't vote unless it's for the Messiah. She needs independents, which is looking pretty good for her in the polls. Who her running mate is could make a big difference with the independents. It probably will have to be a former governor of a state. Go figure. --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
On 5/13/2014 4:51 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] wrote: The dumbass Democrats need to look for someone else, someone younger who will appeal to younger voters. But I don't think they get it any better than the Republicans do. Let's see, the Dems have Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. The Repugs have Paul Ryan, Chirs Christie, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Bobby Jindal, Nikki Haley, Rick Perry and Rand Paul. LoL! --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
Lawson, I admit I'm flummoxed by peoples' fanatical position on Roe vs. Wade. What is that about?! Abortion is a personal tragedy for sure. But why does the religious right try to turn it into a matter of public policy?! On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 2:06 AM, lengli...@cox.net [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Saunders isn't a corporatist, and I certainly would vote for him in a national election. But I would never, ever vote for him in a primary. Lesser of two evils issues are all we CAN get in Presidential races and all we will ever get unless we take a page from the political book of the Religious Right, who have been working to overturn Roe v Wade since the day it started by starting from the very bottom and voting in sympathetic dog catchers and school board members who then run for higher political officer after they establish their political credentials. Moderates and liberals simply don't have the multi-generational fanaticism to play that game, counting on people's better nature, instead. The Religious Right knows that there's no such thing [the Bible told them so], so they always assume the worst about everyone and manipulate, er, act accordingly. L ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog@... wrote : So who isn't a corporatist? Obama? Or didn't you know that when you voted for him?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
He's an independent but Bernie Sanders even at his age could win the millennial vote. On 05/14/2014 07:18 AM, 'Richard J. Williams' pundits...@gmail.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: On 5/13/2014 4:51 PM, Bhairitu noozg...@sbcglobal.net [FairfieldLife] wrote: The dumbass Democrats need to look for someone else, someone younger who will appeal to younger voters. But I don't think they get it any better than the Republicans do. Let's see, the Dems have Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden. The Repugs have Paul Ryan, Chirs Christie, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Bobby Jindal, Nikki Haley, Rick Perry and Rand Paul. LoL! --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
I didn't vote *for* Obama, I voted*against* Romney. On 05/13/2014 08:34 PM, raunchy...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: So who isn't a corporatist? Obama? Or didn't you know that when you voted for him?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
Have you really never read or heard any of the arguments against abortion? That's hard to believe. BTW, abortion is not necessarily always a personal tragedy to those who have one. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Lawson, I admit I'm flummoxed by peoples' fanatical position on Roe vs. Wade. What is that about?! Abortion is a personal tragedy for sure. But why does the religious right try to turn it into a matter of public policy?! On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 2:06 AM, LEnglish5@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Saunders isn't a corporatist, and I certainly would vote for him in a national election. But I would never, ever vote for him in a primary. Lesser of two evils issues are all we CAN get in Presidential races and all we will ever get unless we take a page from the political book of the Religious Right, who have been working to overturn Roe v Wade since the day it started by starting from the very bottom and voting in sympathetic dog catchers and school board members who then run for higher political officer after they establish their political credentials. Moderates and liberals simply don't have the multi-generational fanaticism to play that game, counting on people's better nature, instead. The Religious Right knows that there's no such thing [the Bible told them so], so they always assume the worst about everyone and manipulate, er, act accordingly. L ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog@... wrote : So who isn't a corporatist? Obama? Or didn't you know that when you voted for him?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
I contributed a little money to his 2008 campaign. Nothing for the 2012 because he didn't make it possible for me to spare even that little. But I get spammed all the time by his org trying to pump up his support. You'll love this, a week or so ago it was we'll fly you to San Francisco for free to see the President. What were they planning to do? Have a helicopter land in my street for the 30 mile ride? :-D On 05/14/2014 05:47 AM, fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Guilty! I voted for the little bastard. Oh well - still better than Scary Mitch and Paul, but I am so tired of voting for the best of the worst. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote : The Obama fellow is all hat no cattle. His non-delivery of promises is no surprise in esoteric circles though, and his Nobel Peace prize is a joke. Seems like the the head of that committee is getting fired next year. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : I will be more than pleased when that little corporate elitist goes tripping off on his endless love me party cycle, once out of office. Can't wait. Because of his misplaced allegiance, to his second term, he blatantly sold out people like me. I now pay $4k annually, for medical insurance, that does not comply with Obamacare. My Obamacare insurance tripled, and I can no longer afford it ($12k per year!). So, while insured, I am still liable for his ever increasing fines, each year. Nice job, dickhead. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog@... wrote : So who isn't a corporatist? Obama? Or didn't you know that when you voted for him?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
Judy, sure I've heard the arguments against abortion. Yet I still think some people get fanatical about it and that is what I don't understand. On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 10:59 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Have you really never read or heard any of the arguments against abortion? That's hard to believe. BTW, abortion is not necessarily always a personal tragedy to those who have one. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Lawson, I admit I'm flummoxed by peoples' fanatical position on Roe vs. Wade. What is that about?! Abortion is a personal tragedy for sure. But why does the religious right try to turn it into a matter of public policy?! On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 2:06 AM, LEnglish5@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Saunders isn't a corporatist, and I certainly would vote for him in a national election. But I would never, ever vote for him in a primary. Lesser of two evils issues are all we CAN get in Presidential races and all we will ever get unless we take a page from the political book of the Religious Right, who have been working to overturn Roe v Wade since the day it started by starting from the very bottom and voting in sympathetic dog catchers and school board members who then run for higher political officer after they establish their political credentials. Moderates and liberals simply don't have the multi-generational fanaticism to play that game, counting on people's better nature, instead. The Religious Right knows that there's no such thing [the Bible told them so], so they always assume the worst about everyone and manipulate, er, act accordingly. L ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog@... wrote : So who isn't a corporatist? Obama? Or didn't you know that when you voted for him?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
Share, did you not say you were raised Catholic? How could you not understand the issue well enough to understand some people getting fanatical about it? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, sure I've heard the arguments against abortion. Yet I still think some people get fanatical about it and that is what I don't understand. On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 10:59 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Have you really never read or heard any of the arguments against abortion? That's hard to believe. BTW, abortion is not necessarily always a personal tragedy to those who have one. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Lawson, I admit I'm flummoxed by peoples' fanatical position on Roe vs. Wade. What is that about?! Abortion is a personal tragedy for sure. But why does the religious right try to turn it into a matter of public policy?! On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 2:06 AM, LEnglish5@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Saunders isn't a corporatist, and I certainly would vote for him in a national election. But I would never, ever vote for him in a primary. Lesser of two evils issues are all we CAN get in Presidential races and all we will ever get unless we take a page from the political book of the Religious Right, who have been working to overturn Roe v Wade since the day it started by starting from the very bottom and voting in sympathetic dog catchers and school board members who then run for higher political officer after they establish their political credentials. Moderates and liberals simply don't have the multi-generational fanaticism to play that game, counting on people's better nature, instead. The Religious Right knows that there's no such thing [the Bible told them so], so they always assume the worst about everyone and manipulate, er, act accordingly. L ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog@... wrote : So who isn't a corporatist? Obama? Or didn't you know that when you voted for him?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
Emily, I began leaving the Catholic Church when I was 17 and they said it was no longer a mortal sin to eat meat on Friday. The final straw occurred a year later when I was sitting in my boyfriend's World History class and learned about the Inquisition. This was all in the late 60s and abortion was not yet the inflammatory issue it is now. I understand that people think the foetus is a person and that it's killing a person but I don't agree with this POV. On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 12:20 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Share, did you not say you were raised Catholic? How could you not understand the issue well enough to understand some people getting fanatical about it? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, sure I've heard the arguments against abortion. Yet I still think some people get fanatical about it and that is what I don't understand. On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 10:59 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Have you really never read or heard any of the arguments against abortion? That's hard to believe. BTW, abortion is not necessarily always a personal tragedy to those who have one. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Lawson, I admit I'm flummoxed by peoples' fanatical position on Roe vs. Wade. What is that about?! Abortion is a personal tragedy for sure. But why does the religious right try to turn it into a matter of public policy?! On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 2:06 AM, LEnglish5@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Saunders isn't a corporatist, and I certainly would vote for him in a national election. But I would never, ever vote for him in a primary. Lesser of two evils issues are all we CAN get in Presidential races and all we will ever get unless we take a page from the political book of the Religious Right, who have been working to overturn Roe v Wade since the day it started by starting from the very bottom and voting in sympathetic dog catchers and school board members who then run for higher political officer after they establish their political credentials. Moderates and liberals simply don't have the multi-generational fanaticism to play that game, counting on people's better nature, instead. The Religious Right knows that there's no such thing [the Bible told them so], so they always assume the worst about everyone and manipulate, er, act accordingly. L ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog@... wrote : So who isn't a corporatist? Obama? Or didn't you know that when you voted for him?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
It isn't a matter of whether you agree with it (that's a non sequitur, as are eating meat on Fridays and the Inquisition), it's why you wouldn't understand that people who believe abortion involves murdering innocent, helpless human life are so appalled by it and feel it's their duty to help save all those lives, no matter what it takes. I reject their premise, and I'm very firmly pro-choice, but I have no trouble understanding why it upsets them. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Emily, I began leaving the Catholic Church when I was 17 and they said it was no longer a mortal sin to eat meat on Friday. The final straw occurred a year later when I was sitting in my boyfriend's World History class and learned about the Inquisition. This was all in the late 60s and abortion was not yet the inflammatory issue it is now. I understand that people think the foetus is a person and that it's killing a person but I don't agree with this POV. On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 12:20 PM, emilymaenot@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Share, did you not say you were raised Catholic? How could you not understand the issue well enough to understand some people getting fanatical about it? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, sure I've heard the arguments against abortion. Yet I still think some people get fanatical about it and that is what I don't understand. On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 10:59 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Have you really never read or heard any of the arguments against abortion? That's hard to believe. BTW, abortion is not necessarily always a personal tragedy to those who have one. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Lawson, I admit I'm flummoxed by peoples' fanatical position on Roe vs. Wade. What is that about?! Abortion is a personal tragedy for sure. But why does the religious right try to turn it into a matter of public policy?! On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 2:06 AM, LEnglish5@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Saunders isn't a corporatist, and I certainly would vote for him in a national election. But I would never, ever vote for him in a primary. Lesser of two evils issues are all we CAN get in Presidential races and all we will ever get unless we take a page from the political book of the Religious Right, who have been working to overturn Roe v Wade since the day it started by starting from the very bottom and voting in sympathetic dog catchers and school board members who then run for higher political officer after they establish their political credentials. Moderates and liberals simply don't have the multi-generational fanaticism to play that game, counting on people's better nature, instead. The Religious Right knows that there's no such thing [the Bible told them so], so they always assume the worst about everyone and manipulate, er, act accordingly. L ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog@... wrote : So who isn't a corporatist? Obama? Or didn't you know that when you voted for him?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
Exactly my point. Share, you said ..and that is what I don't understand.that was what the question to you was about. Your history with the Catholic church, detail-wise, while interesting, is not what I was asking. I thought you were stating that at face value, but you were stating it as a subjective opinion and just worded it oddly. FYI, here is a history of political action related to abortion in the US. A lot was going on in the 60's that preceded Roe vs Wade. U.S. Abortion History - Our Bodies Ourselves http://www.ourbodiesourselves.org/health-info/u-s-abortion-history/ http://www.ourbodiesourselves.org/health-info/u-s-abortion-history/ U.S. Abortion History - Our Bodies Ourselves http://www.ourbodiesourselves.org/health-info/u-s-abortion-history/ Women around the world have used abortion to control their reproduction at every point in history, and in every known society – regardless of its legality, whi... View on www.ourbodiesourselv... http://www.ourbodiesourselves.org/health-info/u-s-abortion-history/ Preview by Yahoo ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : It isn't a matter of whether you agree with it (that's a non sequitur, as are eating meat on Fridays and the Inquisition), it's why you wouldn't understand that people who believe abortion involves murdering innocent, helpless human life are so appalled by it and feel it's their duty to help save all those lives, no matter what it takes. I reject their premise, and I'm very firmly pro-choice, but I have no trouble understanding why it upsets them. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Emily, I began leaving the Catholic Church when I was 17 and they said it was no longer a mortal sin to eat meat on Friday. The final straw occurred a year later when I was sitting in my boyfriend's World History class and learned about the Inquisition. This was all in the late 60s and abortion was not yet the inflammatory issue it is now. I understand that people think the foetus is a person and that it's killing a person but I don't agree with this POV. On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 12:20 PM, emilymaenot@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Share, did you not say you were raised Catholic? How could you not understand the issue well enough to understand some people getting fanatical about it? ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, sure I've heard the arguments against abortion. Yet I still think some people get fanatical about it and that is what I don't understand. On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 10:59 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Have you really never read or heard any of the arguments against abortion? That's hard to believe. BTW, abortion is not necessarily always a personal tragedy to those who have one. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Lawson, I admit I'm flummoxed by peoples' fanatical position on Roe vs. Wade. What is that about?! Abortion is a personal tragedy for sure. But why does the religious right try to turn it into a matter of public policy?! On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 2:06 AM, LEnglish5@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Saunders isn't a corporatist, and I certainly would vote for him in a national election. But I would never, ever vote for him in a primary. Lesser of two evils issues are all we CAN get in Presidential races and all we will ever get unless we take a page from the political book of the Religious Right, who have been working to overturn Roe v Wade since the day it started by starting from the very bottom and voting in sympathetic dog catchers and school board members who then run for higher political officer after they establish their political credentials. Moderates and liberals simply don't have the multi-generational fanaticism to play that game, counting on people's better nature, instead. The Religious Right knows that there's no such thing [the Bible told them so], so they always assume the worst about everyone and manipulate, er, act accordingly. L ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog@... wrote : So who isn't a corporatist? Obama? Or didn't you know that when you voted for him?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
They consider it MURDER. Not just rhetoric; that is how they really see it, as the murder of a child. That is why they are so upset about it. I do not agree, at all, but I certainly see why they become fanatics. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, sure I've heard the arguments against abortion. Yet I still think some people get fanatical about it and that is what I don't understand. On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 10:59 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Have you really never read or heard any of the arguments against abortion? That's hard to believe. BTW, abortion is not necessarily always a personal tragedy to those who have one. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Lawson, I admit I'm flummoxed by peoples' fanatical position on Roe vs. Wade. What is that about?! Abortion is a personal tragedy for sure. But why does the religious right try to turn it into a matter of public policy?! On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 2:06 AM, LEnglish5@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Saunders isn't a corporatist, and I certainly would vote for him in a national election. But I would never, ever vote for him in a primary. Lesser of two evils issues are all we CAN get in Presidential races and all we will ever get unless we take a page from the political book of the Religious Right, who have been working to overturn Roe v Wade since the day it started by starting from the very bottom and voting in sympathetic dog catchers and school board members who then run for higher political officer after they establish their political credentials. Moderates and liberals simply don't have the multi-generational fanaticism to play that game, counting on people's better nature, instead. The Religious Right knows that there's no such thing [the Bible told them so], so they always assume the worst about everyone and manipulate, er, act accordingly. L ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog@... wrote : So who isn't a corporatist? Obama? Or didn't you know that when you voted for him?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
Exactly. And also why they want abortion to be illegal. Why that should be hard to understand, I can't imagine. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : They consider it MURDER. Not just rhetoric; that is how they really see it, as the murder of a child. That is why they are so upset about it. I do not agree, at all, but I certainly see why they become fanatics. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, sure I've heard the arguments against abortion. Yet I still think some people get fanatical about it and that is what I don't understand. On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 10:59 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Have you really never read or heard any of the arguments against abortion? That's hard to believe. BTW, abortion is not necessarily always a personal tragedy to those who have one. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Lawson, I admit I'm flummoxed by peoples' fanatical position on Roe vs. Wade. What is that about?! Abortion is a personal tragedy for sure. But why does the religious right try to turn it into a matter of public policy?!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
Methinks Share forgot to add, IN MY HUMBLE OPINION. :) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : Exactly. And also why they want abortion to be illegal. Why that should be hard to understand, I can't imagine. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : They consider it MURDER. Not just rhetoric; that is how they really see it, as the murder of a child. That is why they are so upset about it. I do not agree, at all, but I certainly see why they become fanatics. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, sure I've heard the arguments against abortion. Yet I still think some people get fanatical about it and that is what I don't understand. On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 10:59 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Have you really never read or heard any of the arguments against abortion? That's hard to believe. BTW, abortion is not necessarily always a personal tragedy to those who have one. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Lawson, I admit I'm flummoxed by peoples' fanatical position on Roe vs. Wade. What is that about?! Abortion is a personal tragedy for sure. But why does the religious right try to turn it into a matter of public policy?!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
do you mean in general, or...? :-) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emilymaenot@... wrote : Methinks Share forgot to add, IN MY HUMBLE OPINION. :) ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote : Exactly. And also why they want abortion to be illegal. Why that should be hard to understand, I can't imagine. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, fleetwood_macncheese@... wrote : They consider it MURDER. Not just rhetoric; that is how they really see it, as the murder of a child. That is why they are so upset about it. I do not agree, at all, but I certainly see why they become fanatics. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Judy, sure I've heard the arguments against abortion. Yet I still think some people get fanatical about it and that is what I don't understand. On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 10:59 AM, authfriend@... [FairfieldLife] FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com wrote: Have you really never read or heard any of the arguments against abortion? That's hard to believe. BTW, abortion is not necessarily always a personal tragedy to those who have one. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote : Lawson, I admit I'm flummoxed by peoples' fanatical position on Roe vs. Wade. What is that about?! Abortion is a personal tragedy for sure. But why does the religious right try to turn it into a matter of public policy?!
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
On 5/14/2014 5:57 PM, emilymae...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Methinks Share forgot to add, IN MY HUMBLE OPINION. :) It also looks like everyone forgot to add any of Hillary's achievements to the list. Go figure. --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
On 5/14/2014 4:28 PM, fleetwood_macnche...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: They consider it MURDER. Not just rhetoric; that is how they really see it, as the murder of a child. That is why they are so upset about it. I do not agree, at all, but I certainly see why they become fanatics. At what point does abortion become murder or feticide? In comparison to other developed countries, the procedure is more available in the United States in terms of how late the abortion can legally be performed. --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote : On 5/14/2014 4:28 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... mailto:fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: They consider it MURDER. Not just rhetoric; that is how they really see it, as the murder of a child. That is why they are so upset about it. I do not agree, at all, but I certainly see why they become fanatics. At what point does abortion become murder or feticide? In comparison to other developed countries, the procedure is more available in the United States in terms of how late the abortion can legally be performed. One way or another you are ending a life, snuffing out a viable chance at existence in a physical body for some developing fetus. Now, I am going to speak what many might think of as blasphemy but, in my opinion, a life is a life and no greater value do I feel can I rightly put on one life over another be it frog, man or butterfly. So, for me, it is the fact that one terminating the development of a physical body that is the only thing I can say is happening for sure. As far as souls are concerned and when such a thing might be present or not present I have no idea. What is interesting is that only when we speak about human beings do we term the intentional killing of such as murder. When we are talking about other creatures we simply say we killed them. Is murder worse or the same as killing? It is all the same to me. Abortions happen 'naturally' and they also happen as a result of intentionally terminating a pregnancy. There can be hundreds of reasons for wanting to do so and when it is accomplished the perpetrator has ended a developing life, a potential human or potential puppy or potential foal. Is this wrong? Impossible to say. Is it killing? Absolutely. Is it murder? Not sure. This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus http://www.avast.com/ protection is active.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
Sec. Hillary Clinton Defends Reproductive Rights and Family Planning:http://youtu.be/UH9rC0MaBJc http://youtu.be/UH9rC0MaBJc ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote : On 5/14/2014 4:28 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... mailto:fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: They consider it MURDER. Not just rhetoric; that is how they really see it, as the murder of a child. That is why they are so upset about it. I do not agree, at all, but I certainly see why they become fanatics. At what point does abortion become murder or feticide? In comparison to other developed countries, the procedure is more available in the United States in terms of how late the abortion can legally be performed. This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus http://www.avast.com/ protection is active.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote : On 5/14/2014 4:28 PM, fleetwood_macncheese@... mailto:fleetwood_macncheese@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: They consider it MURDER. Not just rhetoric; that is how they really see it, as the murder of a child. That is why they are so upset about it. I do not agree, at all, but I certainly see why they become fanatics. At what point does abortion become murder or feticide? In comparison to other developed countries, the procedure is more available in the United States in terms of how late the abortion can legally be performed. Is that so? Citation and stats, please. This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus http://www.avast.com/ protection is active.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
The dumbass Democrats need to look for someone else, someone younger who will appeal to younger voters. But I don't think they get it any better than the Republicans do. On 05/13/2014 01:06 PM, jr_...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Karl Rove is questioning Hillary Clinton's health for running as president in the next election. In her jyotish chart, it shows that she will be running a weak Sun in her first house. So, that means that this health issue will be a major factor in her decision to run for the presidency. It is likely that she will address this point on February 17, 2015 by announcing that she will not run for the office. http://news.yahoo.com/rove-hillary-clinton-brain-damage-135738855.html
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
Bhairitu, The Democrats better start looking for another presidential candidate now. It would appear that Biden is a shoo-in for the candidacy. But he will be running a weak period during the election. So, he's vulnerable to a loss at the polls. Elizabeth Warren has a strong chart for career. But she will be running a weak period as well during the election. As such, it would be wise for her not to run. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote : The dumbass Democrats need to look for someone else, someone younger who will appeal to younger voters. But I don't think they get it any better than the Republicans do. On 05/13/2014 01:06 PM, jr_esq@... mailto:jr_esq@... [FairfieldLife] wrote: Karl Rove is questioning Hillary Clinton's health for running as president in the next election. In her jyotish chart, it shows that she will be running a weak Sun in her first house. So, that means that this health issue will be a major factor in her decision to run for the presidency. It is likely that she will address this point on February 17, 2015 by announcing that she will not run for the office. http://news.yahoo.com/rove-hillary-clinton-brain-damage-135738855.html http://news.yahoo.com/rove-hillary-clinton-brain-damage-135738855.html
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
Hillary doesn't need young people to win. They don't vote unless it's for the Messiah. She needs independents, which is looking pretty good for her in the polls. 2016 - 2016 Democratic Presidential Nomination | RealClearPolitics http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_democratic_presidential_nomination-3824.html http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_democratic_presidential_nomination-3824.html 2016 - 2016 Democratic Presidential Nomination | R... http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_democratic_presidential_nomination-3824.html 2016 - 2016 Democratic Presidential Nomination View on www.realclearpoliti... http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_democratic_presidential_nomination-3824.html Preview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
Hillary is just another corporatist candidate. Wake up! On 05/13/2014 05:12 PM, raunchy...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote: Hillary doesn't need young people to win. They don't vote unless it's for the Messiah. She needs independents, which is looking pretty good for her in the polls. 2016 - 2016 Democratic Presidential Nomination | RealClearPolitics http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_democratic_presidential_nomination-3824.html image http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_democratic_presidential_nomination-3824.html 2016 - 2016 Democratic Presidential Nomination | R... http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_democratic_presidential_nomination-3824.html 2016 - 2016 Democratic Presidential Nomination View on www.realclearpoliti... http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/us/2016_democratic_presidential_nomination-3824.html Preview by Yahoo
Re: [FairfieldLife] Hillary's Health: An Issue in 2016
So who isn't a corporatist? Obama? Or didn't you know that when you voted for him?
