Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
In a message dated 8/11/06 12:13:47 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Very serious. They were days away from doing it. They were getting ready for a test run. The same plan Al Qaeda attempted but failed over the Pacific from the Philippines before 911. All the programs the Bush Administration was using like the NSA and Banking program of following money transactions were used in Great Britain to bust them.You know all these details? No, not all. But these were covered yesterday on many different news stories on NBC, CNBC, CNN, and FOX. The British had been watching these 24 and I think they said others for quite some time and they had been using the same program the NSA has been running and also observing their banking transactions between Great Britain and Pakistan and some other countries. The United States had offered the British information on this group in the past two weeks also. I'm just glad the New York Times didn't hear about this before the bust. __._,_.___ To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. __,_._,___
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
In a message dated 8/11/06 2:13:14 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: These conspiracy theorists remind me of what happened with the JFK assassination: for about 35 years, a great many people believed there was more than one shooter. And then new sophisticated computer models became available proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that Oswald was the lone gunman. Now you don't hear any more theories about there being multiple shooters. Yes, I think conspiracy theories usually are for people with too much time on their hands. They can be entertaining. __._,_.___ To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. __,_._,___
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
In a message dated 8/11/06 8:08:04 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm just glad the New York Times didn't hear about this before the bust.How do you know it didn't? It probably would have been on their front pages today saying they did know but held it back for the sake of all the people. __._,_.___ To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. __,_._,___
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
In a message dated 8/11/06 9:26:56 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It probably would have been on their front pages today saying they did know but held it back for the sake of all the people.And be threatened with an investigation andprosecution if it didn't reveal its sources?Are you kidding? Have they been concerned yet? All they do is say its freedom of the press and the people have a right to know and then become heroes to the left who support them.. __._,_.___ To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. __,_._,___
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
shempmcgurk wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: snip These conspiracy theorists remind me of what happened with the JFK assassination: for about 35 years, a great many people believed there was more than one shooter. And then new sophisticated computer models became available proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that Oswald was the lone gunman. Now you don't hear any more theories about there being multiple shooters. Well, no, there was no proof beyond a shadow of a doubt, and the controversy continues. A bunch of books arguing against the lone-gunman theory came out last year, and at least one more is scheduled for October of this year. You don't hear any more theories about there being multiple shooters only if you aren't listening. Reasonable people accept and close the book on one shooter. Nut cases continue to speculate. So you are continuing to speculate. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Things aren't looking good for the Rethugs so wouldn't you have guessed it another ridiculous terrorist alert. Gotta keep the people in fear to control them. So how many days until we learn this plot was bogus? This one was almost certainly for real. It'll be *exploited* up the wazoo, though. And such mindless security, not allowing liquids Supposedly the explosives that were to be used were in liquid form. There was one plot to blow up planes awhile back that planned on using an explosive liquid in a bottle of contact lens cleaning solution. lipstick, chapstick And you could easily disguise plastic explosive as lipstick and Chapstick, so that makes sense too. The real idiocy is the administration's attempt to use this plot to justify the Iraq war. These terrorists were home-grown Brits, for pete's sake. For the cost of a couple of days' worth of the war in Iraq, we could outfit all our airports with scanners that detect explosives (only a few have them now). It's hard to convince me that any of these plots are real. If they are they were probably tricked by black ops. They are going to make traveling so inconvenient that you will probably check in at the airport and then be locked into some kind of cage and loaded on to the plane. All this because of the hysteria and gullibility of the American sheeple. Maybe they will make us all fly nude, perish the thought. :) To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
In a message dated 8/10/06 9:11:31 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED]. wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED].. wrote:---snip--- No , you missed it. "my point" was had the terrorist been successful you would have been demanding another investigation as to how this could happen, as you just did, see above. As for me, I thought the official 911 investigation was simply a political circus. And no I don't think this is a setup but I'm sure you are going to wish it were. No, you are *assuming* why I want an independent 9-11 investigation. I think the "official story" is a cover-up and 9-11 was an inside job and a failed false flag operation. That's why I don't trust this alert especially due to it's timing.But, aren't you both assuming that neither of you is assuming the "official" 9-11 investigation was, in reality, carried out under the assumption (or at least the assumption of the two of you) that the "official story" was NOT actually an inside job (assuming of course that you have agreed to assume the recent alert was (at least I assume it was) an "official" official alert, which is true regardless of whether or not the independent alert was or was not an inside job? You both would agree with this, I assume? ? __._,_.___ To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. __,_._,___
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Another Ridiculous Alert Circus
scienceofabundance wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ---snip--- No , you missed it. my point was had the terrorist been successful you would have been demanding another investigation as to how this could happen, as you just did, see above. As for me, I thought the official 911 investigation was simply a political circus. And no I don't think this is a setup but I'm sure you are going to wish it were. No, you are *assuming* why I want an independent 9-11 investigation. I think the official story is a cover-up and 9-11 was an inside job and a failed false flag operation. That's why I don't trust this alert especially due to it's timing. But, aren't you both assuming that neither of you is assuming the official 9-11 investigation was, in reality, carried out under the assumption (or at least the assumption of the two of you) that the official story was NOT actually an inside job (assuming of course that you have agreed to assume the recent alert was (at least I assume it was) an official official alert, which is true regardless of whether or not the independent alert was or was not an inside job? You both would agree with this, I assume? Cute obfuscation. Let's see if you can write that more straightforward. Maybe Judy can help you. :) To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
