Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: BatGap Panel Discussion – John Hagelin, Ph.D., Igor Kufayev, and Mark McCooey. Moderated by Rick Archer

2013-05-25 Thread Share Long
carde, I'd say that that's one way to frame it.  Maharishi talks about heart 
and mind being fully developed but not connected to each other.  I think he 
also talks about dharma on different levels.  What also comes to mind are the 
research findings about TMers and Kohlberg's Moral Reasoning scale.  





 From: card cardemais...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2013 4:49 PM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: BatGap Panel Discussion – John Hagelin, Ph.D.,  
Igor Kufayev, and Mark McCooey. Moderated by Rick Archer
 


  
FWIW, wasn't it mainly morality that almost prevented 
Krishna from fulfilling his duty as a kshatriya?

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend authfriend@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung no_reply@ wrote:
 (snip)
  Do you have any problem with folks getting the badges taken
  away if they attend other spiritual lectures?
 
 Let me put it this way: I don't have a problem with the TMO
 establishing whatever rules it thinks are necessary to ensure
 maximum effectiveness of the dome program and implementing
 those rules with good judgment and fairness.
 
 But that's in principle. I don't know whether its rules *do*
 ensure maximum effectiveness; nor is it clear to me, from
 what I've heard here (although I have no way of verifying it),
 that the rules are implemented wisely and fairly.
 
 However, it's been my impression that badges aren't taken
 away simply for attending a spiritual lecture; I had thought
 one had to be actively helping the teacher (e.g., making
 arrangements for the lecture). And I had also thought this
 applied only to governors, not the rank and file. Just
 attending a lecture seems like overkill, as well as being
 impossible to enforce consistently.
 
 But I don't live in Fairfield, so I have no firsthand
 knowledge of any of this.
 
 (snip)
  Do you think Hagelin's morality is a bad reflection on the
  efficacy of the TM technique to evolve a personality into a
  more moral being ?  I think you'd have an apology to explain
  that, but I don't know, so I ask if you've put it into text
  yet.
  
  For discussion purposes, let's just talk about anyone who is 
  a serial marriage rapist instead of Hagelin, cuz I only know
  gossip about him, so just answer if you think TM affects
  morality such that a person of that ilk would be improved in,
  say, less than ten years of such therapy.
 
 I'm afraid I'm gonna have to give you another equivocal 
 response here.
 
 I haven't seen much evidence that practice of TM affects
 morality positively (at least morality per my standards).
 
 On the other hand, I've become increasingly uncertain about
 the nature of the relationship between expansion of
 consciousness in the direction of enlightenment (via any
 technique) and morality. I'm not sure these days whether
 there's *any* relationship at all; and if there is, I sure
 wouldn't want to have to define it so as to make it possible
 reliably to discern someone's development of consciousness
 (or the effectiveness of their practice) based on the
 morality (whose?) of their behavior.
 
 One thing I *am* sure of: It's completely unacceptable to
 excuse or try to justify bad behavior on the basis of one's
 estimation of a person's development of consciousness. The
 enlightened guy doesn't get a pass on making a pass.
 
 Best I can do, Edg. I guess that's postmodern spirituality
 for you. ;-) You're welcome to probe further if you'd like
 me to elaborate on my ambivalence.



 

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: BatGap Panel Discussion – John Hagelin, Ph.D., Igor Kufayev, and Mark McCooey. Moderated by Rick Archer

2013-05-23 Thread Share Long
L, I've heard others say that about only seeing remains.  I understand it from 
the perspective of the development from GC to UC.  Both subject and object of 
knowing get subsumed by and thus united by, the process of knowing.  I prefer 
to call that knowingness.  It's kind of a funny combo of statis and activity.  
I've had glimpses only, not claiming anything other than early morning waking 
state.  





 From: sparaig lengli...@cox.net
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 6:13 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: BatGap Panel Discussion – John Hagelin, Ph.D.,  
Igor Kufayev, and Mark McCooey. Moderated by Rick Archer
 


  
I watched the 57 minute version of this panel discussion and a few things that 
I noted:

Apparently it is ok  to mention Ramana Maharishi but not Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. 
The meditation teacher in the center, I believe, was a long-term TM teacher, 
but now perhaps an independent teacher of his own set of techniques?

John, I think, was biting his tongue almost continuously.

The artist had some interesting things to say, but a couple of things he said I 
fould off:   if I heard him correctly, he said that samadhi is where the seeing 
is all that is left? That seer, process of seeing and seen merge and only the 
seeing is left? Di he say or mean seer and I misheard?

Also, he made mention several times of breath suspension, but in fact, if you 
can be aware that your breath has suspended, that is an awareness OF the body 
or at least awareness of breath-suspension, and is not samadhi.

All the panelists seem to have fallen prey to the shortcoming that they mention 
where they assume they have arrived somewhere.

L

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer rick@... wrote:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 New post on Buddha at the Gas Pump 
 
   http://s.wordpress.com/i/emails/blavatar-default.png 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  http://batgap.com/?author=1 
 
 
  http://batgap.com/sand-panel-discussion/ 175. Panel Discussion †John 
 Hagelin, Ph.D., Igor Kufayev, and Mark McCooey. Moderated by Rick Archer
 
 
 by  http://batgap.com/?author=1 Rick 
 
 PANEL: The Three Simultaneously True Levels of Nondual Reality; Don't Mistake 
 Understanding for Realization, Don't Mistake Realization for Liberation. John 
 Hagelin, Ph.D., is a world-renowned quantum physicist, educator, public 
 policy expert, and leading proponent of peace. Dr. Hagelin received his A.B. 
 summa cum laude from Dartmouth College and his M.A. and Ph.D. from Harvard 
 University, […]
 
  http://batgap.com/sand-panel-discussion/ Read more of this post
 
  http://batgap.com/?author=1 Rick | May 20, 2013 at 7:06 am | Categories:  
 http://batgap.com/?taxonomy=categoryterm=guests Guests | URL:  
 http://wp.me/p1q1S0-IB http://wp.me/p1q1S0-IB 
 
 
  http://batgap.com/sand-panel-discussion/#respond Comment
 
 http://batgap.com/sand-panel-discussion/#comments See all comments
 
 
 
 
 Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: 
  http://batgap.com/sand-panel-discussion/ 
 http://batgap.com/sand-panel-discussion/ 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jetpack.wordpress.comblog=20980056post=2765subd=batgap.comref=email=1email_o=jetpack



 

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: BatGap Panel Discussion – John Hagelin, Ph.D., Igor Kufayev, and Mark McCooey. Moderated by Rick Archer

2013-05-23 Thread Rick Archer
 

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On 
Behalf Of sparaig
Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 6:14 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: BatGap Panel Discussion – John Hagelin, Ph.D., 
Igor Kufayev, and Mark McCooey. Moderated by Rick Archer

 

  

I watched the 57 minute version of this panel discussion and a few things that 
I noted:

Apparently it is ok to mention Ramana Maharishi but not Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. 

Hagelin is careful at that conference, and probably others, not to come across 
as a TM/MMY proselytizer. Ramana is universally respected. MMY is not.

The meditation teacher in the center, I believe, was a long-term TM teacher, 
but now perhaps an independent teacher of his own set of techniques?

Mark McCooey? Nope. Not an independent teacher. No set of techniques.

John, I think, was biting his tongue almost continuously.

See above.

All the panelists seem to have fallen prey to the shortcoming that they mention 
where they assume they have arrived somewhere.

At least some of them have. They don’t have to assume. The critique was of 
those who mistake understanding for realization. These guys are quite well 
realized. Their understanding is just icing on the cake.



L

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , 
Rick Archer rick@... mailto:rick@...  wrote:

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 New post on Buddha at the Gas Pump 
 
 http://s.wordpress.com/i/emails/blavatar-default.png 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 http://batgap.com/?author=1 
 
 
 http://batgap.com/sand-panel-discussion/ 175. Panel Discussion †John 
 Hagelin, Ph.D., Igor Kufayev, and Mark McCooey. Moderated by Rick Archer
 
 
 by http://batgap.com/?author=1 Rick 
 
 PANEL: The Three Simultaneously True Levels of Nondual Reality; Don't Mistake 
 Understanding for Realization, Don't Mistake Realization for Liberation. John 
 Hagelin, Ph.D., is a world-renowned quantum physicist, educator, public 
 policy expert, and leading proponent of peace. Dr. Hagelin received his A.B. 
 summa cum laude from Dartmouth College and his M.A. and Ph.D. from Harvard 
 University, […]
 
 http://batgap.com/sand-panel-discussion/ Read more of this post
 
 http://batgap.com/?author=1 Rick | May 20, 2013 at 7:06 am | Categories: 
 http://batgap.com/?taxonomy=category 
 http://batgap.com/?taxonomy=categoryterm=guests term=guests Guests | 
 URL: http://wp.me/p1q1S0-IB http://wp.me/p1q1S0-IB 
 
 
 http://batgap.com/sand-panel-discussion/#respond Comment
 
 http://batgap.com/sand-panel-discussion/#comments See all comments
 
 
 
 
 Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: 
 http://batgap.com/sand-panel-discussion/ 
 http://batgap.com/sand-panel-discussion/ 
 
 
 
 
 
 http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jetpack.wordpress.com 
 http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=jetpack.wordpress.comblog=20980056post=2765subd=batgap.comref=email=1email_o=jetpack
  blog=20980056post=2765subd=batgap.comref=email=1email_o=jetpack






Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: BatGap Panel Discussion – John Hagelin, Ph.D., Igor Kufayev, and Mark McCooey. Moderated by Rick Archer

2013-05-22 Thread Bhairitu
You're assuming these other techniques are concentrative.  They're not.

On 05/22/2013 12:49 AM, sparaig wrote:
 At first, perhaps. In the long run, the more concentrative a technique, the 
 less pure consciousness like the EEG starts to look, both during and after 
 practice.


 L

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@... wrote:
 On 05/21/2013 09:07 AM, Rick Archer wrote:


 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] 
 On Behalf Of authfriend
 Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 10:09 AM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: BatGap Panel Discussion – John Hagelin, 
 Ph.D., Igor Kufayev, and Mark McCooey. Moderated by Rick Archer



 

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , Duveyoung no_reply@ 
 mailto:no_reply@  wrote:
 (snip)
 No way, Maharishi would have done the same panel that even faintly
 suggested there were other meditations that could lead to
 transcendence.
 Maharishi himself said that, for pete's sake.

 But he did always emphasize that TM was the most natural and effective, and 
 that if anything were as natural and effective as TM, then essentially, it 
 was TM, though it might be called something different.
 IOW, a bit of doublespeak.  He knew there were lots of techniques that
 were more powerful but many of those would not be for the general
 public.  That statement also suggests that TM isn't that much different
 from a lot of other meditation techniques.  In general most mantra
 meditation techniques will cause transcendence.








To subscribe, send a message to:
fairfieldlife-subscr...@yahoogroups.com

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
fairfieldlife-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
fairfieldlife-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
fairfieldlife-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: BatGap Panel Discussion – John Hagelin, Ph.D., Igor Kufayev, and Mark McCooey. Moderated by Rick Archer

2013-05-21 Thread Rick Archer
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On 
Behalf Of Duveyoung
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 10:49 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: BatGap Panel Discussion – John Hagelin, Ph.D., 
Igor Kufayev, and Mark McCooey. Moderated by Rick Archer
 
  
Maharishi never authenticated other techniques as guaranteed to be worthy -- 
TM being the only technique with 5,000 years backing it up; whereas the others 
might be 
impure-so-be-careful-of-these-seemingly-maybe-sorta-okay-other-techniques, and 
that one had to be careful to have this long tradition or the effort to spread 
the technique would not be supported by nature -- yada yada.

We were COMMANDED by Jerry Jarvis to not attend lectures of other teachings, 
because, The lecturer will warmly greet the TM initiator's being in the 
audience and thus the audience will ask itself 'Why is that TM teacher there 
except for him having doubts about TM?' 

Are you ignoring that dome badges are lost by anyone BUT Hegelin who would be 
on one of Rick's panels? L.B. got banned, right? 

Hegelin -- why was he there except that the movement is reaching out in 
desperation? 
I think he agreed to participate because I was his initiator, so he has a soft 
spot in his heart for me. I don’t sense any desperation in John. Such 
conferences are small in the big scheme of things, but rather significant in 
the contemporary spiritual scene. Hagelin’s talks at that conference are very 
well received. He’s very diplomatic. He doesn’t mention TM and MMY, but people 
all know he represents them. They’re on some of his slides. He’s respectful of 
other teachers with whom he participates in panel discussions. He doesn’t come 
across as holier-than-thou.


RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: BatGap Panel Discussion – John Hagelin, Ph.D., Igor Kufayev, and Mark McCooey. Moderated by Rick Archer

2013-05-21 Thread Rick Archer
 

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On 
Behalf Of authfriend
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 10:09 AM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: BatGap Panel Discussion – John Hagelin, Ph.D., 
Igor Kufayev, and Mark McCooey. Moderated by Rick Archer

 

  

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com , 
Duveyoung no_reply@... mailto:no_reply@...  wrote:
(snip)
 No way, Maharishi would have done the same panel that even faintly 
 suggested there were other meditations that could lead to
 transcendence.

Maharishi himself said that, for pete's sake.

But he did always emphasize that TM was the most natural and effective, and 
that if anything were as natural and effective as TM, then essentially, it was 
TM, though it might be called something different.



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: BatGap Panel Discussion – John Hagelin, Ph.D., Igor Kufayev, and Mark McCooey. Moderated by Rick Archer

2013-05-21 Thread Bhairitu
On 05/21/2013 09:07 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
   

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On 
 Behalf Of authfriend
 Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 10:09 AM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: BatGap Panel Discussion – John Hagelin, Ph.D., 
 Igor Kufayev, and Mark McCooey. Moderated by Rick Archer

   



 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com 
 , Duveyoung no_reply@... mailto:no_reply@...  wrote:
 (snip)
 No way, Maharishi would have done the same panel that even faintly
 suggested there were other meditations that could lead to
 transcendence.
 Maharishi himself said that, for pete's sake.

 But he did always emphasize that TM was the most natural and effective, and 
 that if anything were as natural and effective as TM, then essentially, it 
 was TM, though it might be called something different.

IOW, a bit of doublespeak.  He knew there were lots of techniques that 
were more powerful but many of those would not be for the general 
public.  That statement also suggests that TM isn't that much different 
from a lot of other meditation techniques.  In general most mantra 
meditation techniques will cause transcendence.




RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: BatGap Panel Discussion – John Hagelin, Ph.D., Igor Kufayev, and Mark McCooey. Moderated by Rick Archer

2013-05-21 Thread Rick Archer
 

From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com] On 
Behalf Of Duveyoung
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2013 1:39 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: BatGap Panel Discussion – John Hagelin, Ph.D., 
Igor Kufayev, and Mark McCooey. Moderated by Rick Archer

 

  


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , 
authfriend wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , 
 Duveyoung no_reply@ wrote:
 
  Maharishi never authenticated other techniques as guaranteed to be worthy 
  -- TM being the only technique with 5,000 years backing it up; whereas the 
  others might be 
  impure-so-be-careful-of-these-seemingly-maybe-sorta-okay-other-techniques, 
  and that one had to be careful to have this long tradition or the effort to 
  spread the technique would not be supported by nature -- yada yada.
  
  We were COMMANDED by Jerry Jarvis to not attend lectures of other 
  teachings, because, The lecturer will warmly greet the TM initiator's 
  being in the audience and thus the audience will ask itself 'Why is that TM 
  teacher there except for him having doubts about TM?' 
  
  Are you ignoring that dome badges are lost by anyone BUT Hegelin who would 
  be on one of Rick's panels? L.B. got banned, right? 
  
  Hegelin -- why was he there except that the movement is reaching out in 
  desperation?
 
 Edg, I haven't watched the video, so I really can't comment.
 And as you know, I speak as just a meditator, not an
 initiator. I simply wanted to point out that we were never
 taught (I was never taught) that TM had a special patent on
 transcending *per se* (TM was said to have other competitive advantages, of 
 course). So please don't read into what I
 said more than was there, OK?

Okay.

Do you have any problem with folks getting the badges taken away if they attend 
other spiritual lectures?  Not sure, but I bet the course office would take a 
dome badge if anyone but Hagelin choose to be interviewed by Rick.  
Rick.anyone lost a dome badge cuz of these interviews?  

I believe one did. And several have declined for fear that they would. The one 
who did may not have lost his badge – not sure – but he had an administrative 
position with the university which he lost shortly after my interview with him, 
probably because of it. I’m sure I’d get the boot for doing this show, if I 
hadn’t already gotten the boot for FFL and Amma activities.