[Bug 225618] Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: bitstream-vera-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225618 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |m) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-27 12:59 EST --- Nicolas, can't we either close this OBSOLETE, or you make whatever changes you like? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 456345] Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456345 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-27 17:25 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: sportrop-fonts Short Description: A multiline decorative font Owners: jstanley Branches: F-9 F-8 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: fonts-sig Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 456345] Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: sportrop-fonts - A multiline decorative font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456345 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-28 00:35 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 455981] Missing locl romanian magic
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Missing locl romanian magic https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455981 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-28 05:34 EST --- Fixed upstream in 2.26. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 456527] Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gentium-basic-fonts - Gentium Basic Font Family https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456527 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]| |m) | --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-28 06:41 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) I'll start the review process now but since I'll be unavailable till september in a few days someone else will probably have to finish it (or you'll have to wait or be very reactive) Thanks. 2. Gentium Basic is OFL, not GPL Oops. My fault. http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/render_download.php?site_id=nrsiformat=filemedia_id=GentiumBasic_110_difffilename=ttf-sil-gentium-basic_1.1.diff.gz 8. Since the font is effectively a limited Gentium with more faces, you need to teach fontconfig to substitute it to Gentium (and the Gentium packager will need to do it the other way). Look how it's done for dejavu and dejavu lgc, that's just a little fontconfig file to add I am little unsure about what to substitute for faces. The families are generically serif for all the fonts in this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 455995] No OpenType
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-28 22:53 EST --- ok, so where are we here? Shall we just stick with the truetype fonts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 453079] fonts-hebrew is deprecated and should be removed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: fonts-hebrew is deprecated and should be removed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453079 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 453075] fonts-arabic is deprecated and should be removed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: fonts-arabic is deprecated and should be removed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453075 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 448078] [ml-IN] Font size problem with Meera
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml-IN] Font size problem with Meera https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448078 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-29 05:23 EST --- this bug is fixed in upstream malayalam-fonts-04.1.zip built it for rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457021] New: Crash on startup, missing font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457021 Summary: Crash on startup, missing font Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: fontforge AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] fontforge-20080309-1.fc9.x86_64 $ fontforge Copyright (c) 2000-2008 by George Williams. Executable based on sources from 22:48 GMT 9-Mar-2008. Library based on sources from 22:48 GMT 9-Mar-2008. Help! Server claimed font -ibm-courier-medium-r-normal--13-0-0-0-m-0-iso10646-1 existed in the font list, but when I asked for it there was nothing. I may crash soon. Segmentation fault (core dumped) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-fonts-bugs- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-29 10:23 EST --- *** Bug 454148 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|CANTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-29 10:23 EST --- Last my comment 12 was my misunderstanding.. resubmitting *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 457062 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457021] Crash on startup, missing font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Crash on startup, missing font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457021 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-29 11:26 EST --- This seems like it might be a duplicate of: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 Can you remove the xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 package and see if that resolves it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457094] New: Upstream fix for missing Romanian glyphs in Type 1 fonts is now available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457094 Summary: Upstream fix for missing Romanian glyphs in Type 1 fonts is now available Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All URL: https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?23940 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: freetype AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Description of problem, adapted from [https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/L10N/Tasks/Ro_fonts#The_Unicode_map_for_Type_1_fonts_needs_to_alias_U.2B021A.2FB_to_U.2B0162.2F3]: PostScript Type 1 (PS1) fonts don't have a native Unicode map. Contrary to popular belief, Type 1 fonts can store more than 256 glyphs in a pfb file, but these can only be addressed by AGL name. At most 256 glyphs can be accessed by a numeric index, for which various encodings schemes exist. A PS1 font can even specify its own 8-bit encoding scheme in the afm file; this is common practice for PS1 fonts targeting Central and Eastern Europe. The 8-bit encoding scheme is irrelevant however for Unicode applications. Unicode-enabled libraries, like freetype, define their own mapping from Unicode to AGL names, normally using the list published by Adobe. Adobe once decided that t with cedilla is not used in any language, so the AGL name Tcommaaccent, which is a glyph of T with a comma below, is actually mapped by Adobe to the Unicode code point U+0162, which is supposed to represent a t with cedilla. New OpenType fonts from Adobe also contain a glyph with the AGL name uni021A, which is visually identical to identical to Tcommaaccent. As you'd expect, uni021A is mapped to U+021A. Unfortunately, old PS1 fonts do not a have a uni021A in their pfb. Thus, using the Adobe-provide AGL to Unicode mapping for PS1 fonts, the code point U+021A remains unmapped. Fontconfig will therefore choose to borrow the glyph from a another font, even though the glyph is present in the pfb. This problem is illustrated by the following OpenOffice screenshot: [http://www.cs.umd.edu/~gaburici/oo/ro-font-test.png]. Practically all PostScript type 1 fonts that ship with Fedora suffer from this problem. Microsoft's Uniscribe automatically handles this issue by remapping U+21A/B to U+162/3 when the former glyphs are missing. Unfortunately, the Pango/fonconfig/freetype stack did't use to do this until 2008-07-27, so most new Romanian documents cannot be displayed with Type 1 fonts properly. The extra mapping has now been added in the CVS of freetype. A test SRPM is available here: [http://www.cs.umd.edu/~gaburici/freetype-2.3.8-0.3.20080729cvs.fc9.src.rpm]. Note that because it is built from CVS sources, it buildrequires libtool 2.2.4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457094] Upstream fix for missing Romanian glyphs in Type 1 fonts is now available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Upstream fix for missing Romanian glyphs in Type 1 fonts is now available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457094 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||435737 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-29 12:03 EST --- If anyone is foolish enough (like me) to upgrade their libtool, a SRPM is here: http://www.cs.umd.edu/~gaburici/libtool-2.2.4-0.1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457021] Crash on startup, missing font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Crash on startup, missing font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457021 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-29 12:35 EST --- Indeed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457021] Crash on startup, missing font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Crash on startup, missing font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457021 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-29 18:12 EST --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 450709 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 450709] xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: xorg-x11-fonts-Type1 doesn't update cache files on upgrade https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450709 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-29 18:12 EST --- *** Bug 457021 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 455995] No OpenType
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: No OpenType https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455995 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-29 18:13 EST --- ok. Closing this bug now. Thanks for all the info, and please do reopen or file a new bug when you think we should look at switching to the OTF's. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-fonts-bugs- ||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457281] Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: unikurd-fonts - A widely used Kurdish font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457281 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-30 13:02 EST --- * Tue Jul 30 2008 Michal Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 1.00-1 - initial packaging - this package should be prepared for another unikurd fonts in sub-packages because on the KurdIT group/unikurd web there are plenthora of them, but probably not under suitable licenses -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457298] New: em-dash glyph wrong in serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457298 Summary: em-dash glyph wrong in serif font Product: Fedora Version: 9 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Description of problem: The em-dash character U2014 has an incorrect glyph at least in the serif font. It displays as ñ instead. See the attached crop of a screenshot (this is firefox showing the code described below). Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): liberation-fonts-1.04-1.fc9.noarch How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1.store this in a file start html should be em-dash gt;gt; #8212; lt;lt; pre should be em-dash gt;gt; #8212; lt;lt; /pre em-dash = U2014 = amp;#8212 /html end 2.view in firefox 3. Actual results: see attached screenshot Expected results: correctly displayed em-dash Additional info: --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-30 15:06 EST --- Created an attachment (id=313022) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313022action=view) Crop of screenshot showing code above in firefox -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457298] em-dash glyph wrong in serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: em-dash glyph wrong in serif font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457298 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-30 15:15 EST --- Restarting your desktop should fix it. That's usually a font caching problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457298] em-dash glyph wrong in serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: em-dash glyph wrong in serif font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457298 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-30 22:25 EST --- I will do a triage very soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-31 17:08 EST --- Spec and src updated: Spec URL: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/darkgarden-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm Lyos Gemini Norezel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-01 01:12 EST --- Mock Build files and logs: SRPMS: FC7: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc7.src.rpm FC8: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc8.src.rpm FC9: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm RPMS: FC7: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc7.noarch.rpm FC8: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc8.noarch.rpm FC9: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/darkgarden-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.noarch.rpm Logs: FC7: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/build-fc7.log FC8: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/build-fc8.log FC9: http://www.oslb.net/fonts/darkgarden/build-fc9.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 429527] [ml_IN]: Removal of a glyph from font file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [ml_IN]: Removal of a glyph from font file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429527 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-01 05:43 EST --- Fixed in fedora,needs to be built for RHEL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 429901] [te_IN]upon joined charecter the halant was not rendering properly in te-IN
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: [te_IN]upon joined charecter the halant was not rendering properly in te-IN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429901 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|rawhide |9 Bug 429901 depends on bug 400891, which changed state. Bug 400891 Summary: [te_IN] upon joined charecter the halant was not rendering properly in te-IN https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=400891 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-05-14 00:51 EST --- Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-01 06:35 EST --- Thanks for the package -- it seems very well. Filelists, provides and requires are sane; SPEC file is clean and legible. APPROVED Note: The src.rpms linked to above are either outdated or truncated, I tested the the new SPEC file with source from older SRPM. Please ensure that you use the right SPEC file when importing. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||177841 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|177841 | nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 454128] Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-01 16:39 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: thibault-fonts Short Description: A collection of fonts from thibault.org, including Isabella, Essays1743, Rockets, and StayPuft. Owners: lyosnorezel Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: lyosnorezel Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-01 16:39 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: thibault-fonts Short Description: A collection of fonts from thibault.org, including Isabella, Essays1743, Rockets, and StayPuft. Owners: lyosnorezel Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: lyosnorezel Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-01 22:40 EST --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: darkgarden-fonts Short Description: Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. Owners: lyosnorezel Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: lyosnorezel Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-01 22:42 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 454128] Review Request: thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: Thibault- |Review Request: thibault- |fonts - Collection of fonts |fonts - Collection of fonts |from thibault.org |from thibault.org Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-01 22:40 EST --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 454128] Review Request: thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-02 07:27 EST --- thibault-fonts-0.1-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #312229|4 to 5 patch|updated spec file description|| Attachment #312229|un-core-fonts.spec-5.1.patc |un-core-fonts.spec-5.1 filename|h | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Customer Facing||--- --- Comment #38 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-04 01:59:00 EDT --- Dennis communicated to me that he is happy with the .spec file in attachment 312229. I am sponsoring Dennis - thank you for the review! This package is APPROVED for inclusion in Fedora. Please go ahead and follow the process from step 7 on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join also explains the steps in more detail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 | Customer Facing||--- --- Comment #25 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-04 02:03:28 EDT --- Dennis is now sponsored - so removing needsponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 --- Comment #2 from _pjp_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-04 04:14:44 EDT --- Hello Mamoru, Looks good to me. The build/install from source and rpm did work without any hassles. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-04 04:39:43 EDT --- Thank you. If you think that this package can be approved, would you set fedora-review flag to + and write on this bug that you approved this review request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 448078] [ml-IN] Font size problem with Meera
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448078 --- Comment #2 from Ani Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-04 06:15:51 EDT --- smc-fonts-malayalam seems to be ok, hence am closing the bug. Pravins, thanks a lot :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 448078] [ml-IN] Font size problem with Meera
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448078 Pravin Satpute [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 --- Comment #4 from _pjp_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-04 08:07:33 EDT --- Yes, I approve this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-04 10:43:26 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: monafont Short Description: Japanese font for text arts Owners:mtasaka Branches: F-9 F-8 InitialCC: (nobody) Cvsextras Commits: welcome -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 454128] Review Request: thibault-fonts - Collection of fonts from thibault.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454128 Lyos Gemini Norezel [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 454967] Review Request: darkgarden-fonts - Dark Garden is a decorative outline font of unusual shape.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454967 Lyos Gemini Norezel [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||m Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-04 14:51:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-04 15:00:17 EDT --- To Kevin: Thanks for CVS procedure. By the way I am seeing that every time you write cvs done you add yourself to CC list. Perhaps you want to check bug 457664 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-04 15:27:41 EDT --- Excellent idea. Thanks for the pointer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-04 16:22:37 EDT --- Rebuild on devel/F-9/F-8, request to push to reqository on F-9/F-8 done, closing. Thank you for the review and CVS procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-04 16:38:19 EDT --- Oops.. Package Change Request == Package Name: monafont Branches: devel F-9 F-8 Updated Fedora CC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457062] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457062 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-04 19:18:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457868] New: Update latest release from upstream.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Update latest release from upstream. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457868 Summary: Update latest release from upstream. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/CJKUnifonts/Downl oad OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: cjkunifonts AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: New release version is available from upstream. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 0.1.20060928.6 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. `rpm -qa | grep cjkunifonts` Actual results: cjkunifonts-uming-0.1.20060928.6-1.fc10.noarch cjkunifonts-ukai-0.1.20060928.6-1.fc10.noarch Expected results: cjkunifonts-uming-0.2.20080216.1-1.fc10.noarch cjkunifonts-ukai-0.2.20080216.1-1.fc10.noarch Additional info: N/A -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457868] Update latest release from upstream.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457868 --- Comment #1 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-05 00:53:16 EDT --- Building http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=758806 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457868] Update latest release from upstream.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457868 Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-05 00:58:06 EDT --- Built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 456580] Multiple severe problems with texlive-texfm-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456580 Brennan Ashton [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457883] Sindhi Characters are not supported in pango [U+097B-U+097F]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457883 --- Comment #1 from Pravin Satpute [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-05 08:27:47 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=313446) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313446) it defines unicode characters for range 0970-097F in devaCharClasses It add support for following characters 0970: sign (known character) 0971: sign ( reference http://www.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc2/wg2/docs/n3125.pdf) 0972: Independant Vowel (known character) 097B-097F: Consonant (reference http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC2/wg2/docs/n2934.pdf ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 450810] Baekmuk Dotum slash '/' is very wide
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450810 Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Customer Facing||--- --- Comment #12 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-06 01:46:57 EDT --- Emailed upstream about the problem of dotum: http://kldp.net/projects/baekmuk/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457298] em-dash glyph wrong in serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457298
Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Customer Facing||---
--- Comment #4 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-06 02:35:06 EDT
---
Triaged with the following:
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/9/i386/liberation-fonts-1.04-1.fc9.noarch.rpm
Results:
- Configured firefox 3.0.1 with Liberation Serif as default font and loaded the
html code provided by reporter, it is shown correctly.
- Started gucharmap and select Liberation Serif font. Searched U+2014 and it
also displays correctly.
- Opened LiberationSerif-{Regular,Bold}.ttf with fontforge and searched for
U+2014. There is correct glyph in U+2014 codepoint.
This bug should be closed 'notabug'.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457298] em-dash glyph wrong in serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457298 Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||i18n Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457298] em-dash glyph wrong in serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457298 --- Comment #5 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-06 02:44:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=313530) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313530) Screenshot on my firefox. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457298] em-dash glyph wrong in serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457298 --- Comment #6 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-06 02:45:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=313531) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313531) Screenshot on my gucharmap. Top left is the U+2014. It does show correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 457883] Sindhi Characters are not supported in pango [U+097B-U+097F]
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457883 Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Customer Facing||--- Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #3 from Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-06 04:14:00 EDT --- 2008-08-06 Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fedora Bug 457883 - Sindhi Characters are not supported in pango [U+097B-U+097F] Patch from Pravin Satpute * modules/indic/indic-ot-class-tables.c: Add [U+097B-U+097F]. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 456582] Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456582 Vasile Gaburici [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||458430 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 Vasile Gaburici [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #12 from Vasile Gaburici [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-08 21:58:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) Ok. Anyway if you want more info Adobe-side, Thomas Phinney seems to be the contact. He's basically the manager of the their font divison. He does comment on licensing matters on typophile.com. But he's been mum about some shady issues like whether it's okay to produce documents using the Minion and Myriad that come with Adobe Reader; AFAICT nobody from Adobe ever cleared that up. So I wouldn't hold my breath that he'll answer this patent issue either... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 452317] Review Request: heuristica-fonts - Heuristica font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452317 --- Comment #13 from Vasile Gaburici [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-08 22:02:46 EDT --- There has been an update upstream a couple of days ago. The author added the Bold and BoldItalic variants, so you should probably update the rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 Vasile Gaburici [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 458476] RFE: Support OpenType CFF fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458476 Caolan McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Summary|No support for OpenType CFF |RFE: Support OpenType CFF |fonts |fonts --- Comment #3 from Caolan McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-09 07:44:33 EDT --- For http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=79878, Condensed, Expanded, etc fonts are covered by bug #436520 which dtardon is working on. OOo discovers fonts through fontconfig, so if fontconfig doesn't know about them then we don't have a chance to even get started on using them. But I'll have a look at what we could do to use them assuming that they would get found -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 458476] RFE: Support OpenType CFF fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458476 --- Comment #4 from Caolan McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-09 08:37:55 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=313871) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313871) half assed patch to get started -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 458476] RFE: Support OpenType CFF fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458476 Caolan McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||OpenOffice.org 43029 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 458476] RFE: Support OpenType CFF fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458476 --- Comment #8 from Vasile Gaburici [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-09 13:34:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) Created an attachment (id=313875) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313875) [details] upstreams version, targeted for 3.2 so upstream already has that much for layout the font displaying it, what's missing is the printing and pdf export portion apparently A problem solved a couple of year back in XeTeX. The solution is not ideal, but works ok in practice: CFF fonts get converted on the fly to CID-keyed Type 1 fonts (/CIDFontType0); the embedding does not use a /FontFile3 Subtype key, which is the direct way to embed a CFF font in a PDF. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 458476] RFE: Support OpenType CFF fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458476 --- Comment #9 from Vasile Gaburici [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-09 14:06:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) (In reply to comment #5) Created an attachment (id=313875) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313875) [details] [details] upstreams version, targeted for 3.2 so upstream already has that much for layout the font displaying it, what's missing is the printing and pdf export portion apparently A problem solved a couple of year back in XeTeX. The solution is not ideal, but works ok in practice: CFF fonts get converted on the fly to CID-keyed Type 1 fonts (/CIDFontType0); the embedding does not use a /FontFile3 Subtype key, which is the direct way to embed a CFF font in a PDF. Correction: XeTeX does embed CFF fonts without conversion. I was confused because the /Subtype key comes after the (long) /CIDSet business, and it uses /Subtype/CIDFontType0C for /FontFile3, not /Subtype/OpenType. The reason why XeTeX uses /CIDFontType0C is that the /OpenType subtype requires PDF-1.6, while /CIDFontType0C works in PDF-1.3, which is what XeTeX (xdvipdfmx actually) outupts. To further add to the confusion, evince displays CFF fonts embedded with /CIDFontType0C as Type 1C (CID) in the font info box, while pdffonts lists them as CID Type 0C. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 458476] RFE: Support OpenType CFF fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458476 --- Comment #10 from Vasile Gaburici [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-09 14:13:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) Correction: XeTeX does embed CFF fonts without conversion. I was confused because the /Subtype key comes after the (long) /CIDSet business, and it uses /Subtype/CIDFontType0C for /FontFile3, not /Subtype/OpenType. The reason why XeTeX uses /CIDFontType0C is that the /OpenType subtype requires PDF-1.6, while /CIDFontType0C works in PDF-1.3, which is what XeTeX (xdvipdfmx actually) outupts. To further add to the confusion, evince displays CFF fonts embedded with /CIDFontType0C as Type 1C (CID) in the font info box, while pdffonts lists them as CID Type 0C. Addendum: if one actually wants to include a CFF font *without* a CID table, then PDF-1.6 is a must because /Subtype/OpenType is the only correct description for it. The PDF spec is mess when in comes to fonts... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 458592] New: Different render in the original and 1.0.4 version
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Different render in the original and 1.0.4 version https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458592 Summary: Different render in the original and 1.0.4 version Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: I was using the LiberationSans version from the original announcement at https://www.redhat.com/f/fonts/liberation-fonts-ttf-3.tar.gz (now 404). I replaced it with 1.0.4 from https://fedorahosted.org/liberation-fonts/ . I use this fonts in a game engine that is ported from Windows, and that was using Arial originally. The font rendering is done through SDL_ttf (with style TTF_STYLE_BOLD) which itself called libfreetype6. The new version of the font has a decreased quality. I attach 2 screenshots with the 2 different versions. Check for example the y: the top of the letter isn't aligned with the top of the other letters. Note that the screenshots are taken from Debian Lenny, whose libfreetype6 has TT_CONFIG_OPTION_BYTECODE_INTERPRETER activated. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 1.0.4 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: The game is in development, I don't have a short procedure to install the game right now, but let me know if you're interested in that. Actual results: Irregular letters. Apparent regression in font quality. Expected results: Improved quality ;) Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 458592] Different render in the original and 1.0.4 version
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458592 --- Comment #1 from Sylvain Beucler [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-10 12:54:50 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=313895) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313895) Screenshot with LiberationSans 2007 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 458592] Different render in the original and 1.0.4 version
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458592 --- Comment #5 from Sylvain Beucler [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-11 13:45:50 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=313987) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=313987) 1. hinting on -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 458592] Different render in the original and 1.0.4 version
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458592 --- Comment #4 from Sylvain Beucler [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-11 13:45:06 EDT --- Are two results generated on same environment? Yes, exactly the same, except for the font. I don't use libfreetype6 so I couldn't comment if there are any effects from that. Note that Fedora has TT_CONFIG_OPTION_BYTECODE_INTERPRETER disabled because of patents treats (while it is activated in Debian and Gentoo, for example). This prevents the hinting bytecode interpreter to work, and changes the rendering and size quite a bit. However, I only get enabling compatible size when the hinting bytecode interpreter is enabled: under Fedora I couldn't get the same text size than under Windows for the game engine. I attach 2 screenshots, showing FreeType's 'ftview' utility with size 16 and anti-aliasing disabled (what the game uses). Left is 1.03, right is 1.04. The first screenshot has glyph hinting on, the second has it off. On the first one you'll see the difference on y. This could mean that the hinting bytecode was not or not properly imported in fontforge, which would be embarrassing. Therefore, we kept the 1.03 binary available on the hosting for those people who preferred 1.03. Indeed 1.03 doesn't present this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 458923] New: FreeType 2.3.7 has been released (2008-Jun-29)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FreeType 2.3.7 has been released (2008-Jun-29) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458923 Summary: FreeType 2.3.7 has been released (2008-Jun-29) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://sourceforge.net/project/shownotes.php?group_id= 3157release_id=610109 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: medium Component: freetype AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This is a bugfix release for the 2.3 series which provides some important fixes which have been introduced in version 2.3.6. Additionally, native bytecode hinting for TrueType fonts has been improved. Please, update it before Fedora 10. -thanks- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 458938] New: Lohit fonts need to support more languages based on Devanagari
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Lohit fonts need to support more languages based on Devanagari https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458938 Summary: Lohit fonts need to support more languages based on Devanagari Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Keywords: i18n Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: lohit-fonts AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Lohit series includes Hindi font which is used for multiple languages that use Devanagari script. It is better to split this font for each language as Lohit Marathi, Lohit Maithili, Lohit Kashmiri, Lohit Sindhi and Lohit Konkani etc. It would be easier to maintain the langugae specific features of the script that way. Also it would give better usability, for example Lohit Hindi will no more be the default font for Marathi locale. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 458951] [snd-IN] Sindhi language is not identified by fontconfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458951 --- Comment #1 from Rahul Bhalerao [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-13 09:40:52 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=314203) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=314203) snd.orth file Adding this file to the fc-lang directory in fontcofig source tree solves the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 458923] Update to latest FreeType version which is 2.3.7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458923 John Poelstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||FutureFeature Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Blocks||446447 Customer Facing||--- Summary|FreeType 2.3.7 has been |Update to latest FreeType |released (2008-Jun-29) |version which is 2.3.7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 458951] [snd-IN] Sindhi language is not identified by fontconfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458951 Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||FreeDesktop.org 17140 --- Comment #2 from Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-14 14:29:39 EDT --- Upstreamed: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17140 It will be in F10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 453017] Review Request: un-extra-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017 --- Comment #26 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-18 03:57:44 EDT --- (And un-core-fonts is approved though still pending cvs.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Comment #39 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-18 03:56:02 EDT --- Dennis, ping :) Can you please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure so we can get this package added to Fedora soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 459451] Changes in glyph point settings window could not be applied.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459451 Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||458592 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 459451] Changes in glyph point settings window could not be applied.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459451 --- Comment #2 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-21 00:57:02 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=314682) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=314682) Patch from George Williams George Williams (gww AT silcom DOT com) is one of contributors in fontforge-devel mailing lists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 458592] Different render in the original and 1.0.4 version
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458592 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-21 01:43:18 EDT --- Caius, actually I think attachment 313987 is quite clear - so you should be able to reproduce on Debian with that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-core-fonts - Korean TrueType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016 --- Comment #41 from Dennis Jang [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-21 02:02:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: un-core-fonts Short Description: Un Core families Korean TrueType fonts Owners: smallvil Branches: devel F-9 F-8 InitialCC: petersen,fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 458592] Differences in rendering in the original and 1.0.4 version
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458592 Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Different render in the |Differences in rendering in |original and 1.0.4 version |the original and 1.0.4 ||version --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-21 02:35:30 EDT --- It is funny how only 'y' based glyphs seem much affected in that screenshot anyway. I tried on Ubuntu-8.04 but didn't see it there FWIW. Sylvain, do you know when TT_CONFIG_OPTION_BYTECODE_INTERPRETER was activated: I mean which package version of freetype? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 458592] Differences in rendering in the original and 1.0.4 version
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458592 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-21 19:44:32 EDT --- Thanks! Easily reproduced on Ubuntu-8.04 too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 458923] Update to latest FreeType version which is 2.3.7
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458923 Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 458592] Differences in rendering in the original and 1.0.4 version
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458592 --- Comment #14 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-24 22:45:33 EDT --- Trying to fix with patched fontforge. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 459451] Changes in glyph point settings window could not be applied.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459451 --- Comment #4 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 01:13:21 EDT --- Hi Kevin, I have just tested this patch when I patched on bug #458592 and this patch resolves the problem. I support the application of this patch. Unsure if his patch is accepted to be included in next upstream release yet. Cheers, Caio. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 458592] Differences in rendering in the original and 1.0.4 version
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458592 --- Comment #15 from Caius CHANCE [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-25 01:22:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=314902) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=314902) Sample patched 1.04, with 'y' glyph points and hinting instructions 're-cloned' from 1.03. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
