Introduction
Hi All, I'm an advanced hobbyist with lots of GIMP and Photoshop experience. Cheers! Paul___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
Re: Introduction
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, Hi, I'm an advanced hobbyist with lots of GIMP and Photoshop experience. Welcome on board. Have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Artwork/DesignService -- nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com Cool Fedora wallpapers: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro/wallpapers/ Open Clip Art Library: http://www.openclipart.org my Fedora stuff: http://fedora.nicubunu.ro ___ Fedora-art-list mailing list Fedora-art-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-art-list
distro build by pungi has got something wrong with the fontconfig
i have rebuilt a fedora 9 distribution with pungi in Fedora 9. but it seems that there is something wrong with the font in the anaconda graphic mode while installing. no characters can be seen during installation except the unknown □. here is the error message below: 15:10:33 WARNING: step installtype does not exist 15:10:33 WARNING: step confirminstall does not exist 15:10:33 WARNING: setup complete does not exist 15:10:34 WARNING: /usr/lib/anaconda/gui.py:1460: PangoWarning: No fonts found: This probably means that the fontconfig library is not correctly configured. you may need to edit the fonts.conf configuration files. More information about fontconfig can be found in the fontconfig(3) manual page and on http://fontconfig.org domain=anaconda) 15:10:34 WARNING: /usr/lib/anaconda/gui.py:1460: PangoWarning: failed to find shape engine, expect ugly output. enginetype=PangoRender, script='latin' domain=anaconda) 15:10:34 INFO : moving (1) to step welcome and i have checked the stage2.img. it seems there is no /usr/share/fonts/ directory. i think it is something wrong with anaconda-runtime, but i don't know where. -- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
Re: distro build by pungi has got something wrong with the fontconfig
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 16:09 +0800, 陈鲍孜 wrote: and i have checked the stage2.img. it seems there is no /usr/share/fonts/ directory. i think it is something wrong with anaconda-runtime, but i don't know where. It sounds like your package manifest (%packages) isn't including the right set of fonts. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list Fedora-buildsys-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
[Bug 473836] Fonts in firefox look blurry
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473836 --- Comment #16 from Martin Stransky [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 02:59:24 EDT --- Get your beta here - http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-beta.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 474522] Incorrect cent sign glyph (U+00A2) in Sans and Mono style in Liberation fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474522 --- Comment #5 from san [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 03:25:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) I tried to work on your demand, could you kindly have a look sample: http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packages/liberation-fonts/LiberationMono-BoldItalic.sfd http://fedorapeople.org/~cchance/packages/liberation-fonts/LiberationMono-BoldItalic.ttf Let me know if you are happy with that. So I could proceed changes on all included fonts. I check with the fonts from https://fedorahosted.org/releases/l/i/liberation-fonts/liberation-fonts-1.04.93.devel.zip, all fixed. Thanks. Here I put the reason to report the bug： 1) to follow the unicode reference: http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/00a2/index.htm 2) cent sign marked as acrossed C is more clear and easy to designate in small size. Liberation fonts will be the first choice for LGC. Thank you ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 18725] RFE: allow merging of legacy font family names
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18725 Julian Sikorski [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #1 from Julian Sikorski [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 05:10:29 PST --- Currently arial narrow is being partially merged, which from users' point of view is even worse since it is not possible to select arial narrow in any way, neither as a separate font or as a style of arial. Please fix this. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 18725] RFE: allow merging of legacy font family names
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18725 --- Comment #2 from Julian Sikorski [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 07:04:41 PST --- Please note that I'm not asking to return to the old behaviour, I'm asking for a proper fix which will benefit everyone. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 563862] Arial font styles are incorrect
If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563862 pango | general | Ver: 1.22.x --- Comment #2 from Julian Sikorski 2008-12-09 15:29 UTC --- Created an attachment (id=124281) -- (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=124281action=view) gtk font selector under pl_PL locale -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=563862. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 13:30:41 EDT --- FedoraHosted request http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1040 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475606] New: pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10 installation error
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10 installation error https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475606 Summary: pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10 installation error Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora When I tried to install pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10 on x86-64, I got Finished Transaction Test Transaction Check Error: file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/PangoMarkupFormat.html conflicts between attempted installs of pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 and pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 file /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/pango/pango-querymodules.html conflicts between attempted installs of pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.x86_64 and pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10.i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475606] pango-devel-1.22.3-1.fc10 installation error
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475606 Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 15:10:22 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 475233 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475233] pango update i386 conflicts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475233 Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #1 from Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 15:10:22 EDT --- *** Bug 475606 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[pkgdb] bitstream-vera-fonts ownership updated
Package bitstream-vera-fonts in Fedora devel is now owned by behdad To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/bitstream-vera-fonts ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[pkgdb] bitstream-vera-fonts ownership updated
Package bitstream-vera-fonts in Fedora devel was orphaned by behdad To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/bitstream-vera-fonts ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 18928] RFE: add a gfx preview to font packages
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18928 Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #2 from Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 13:29:13 PST --- Sounds like fun. I can do everything up to generating the PDF. What should we do with it then? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 18928] RFE: add a gfx preview to font packages
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18928 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 13:30:52 PST --- Thinking about it a bit more, PDF with embedded glyphs would probably run afoul of no-embedding restrictions in some font licenses (including GPL fonts), so a SVG pangram preview is probably a better solution. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635 --- Comment #8 from Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 16:32:22 EDT --- Chris DiBona at Google let me know that the change has happened upstream: http://review.source.android.com/5401 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 18928] RFE: add a gfx preview to font packages
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18928 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 13:42:26 PST --- I think that if you can generate the preview stuff, Richard just has to define where to install it on the filesystem and how to name it so packagekit can scrape it and display it in its GUI (like it does for desktop icons for example) -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 18928] RFE: add a gfx preview to font packages
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=18928 --- Comment #5 from Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 13:50:22 PST --- If there's any embedding restrictions, the font is useless in Fedora. That happens every time you print anything. We never embed full fonts though. Neither do we embed OpenType tables, etc. We subset, and the subset is as useful as the outlines ending up in a SVG. I don't think there's any problem there. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635 Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||475661 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475661] Review Request: google-droid-fonts - The Droid font set
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475661 Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||at.com Blocks||446451 Depends on||472635, 475593 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 473836] Fonts in firefox look blurry
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473836 Andrzej Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |n.pl) | --- Comment #17 from Andrzej Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 18:00:11 EDT --- The problem is also present in Seamonkey for FC10. I've attached a screenshot. I've also attached screenshots demonstrating the problem in GEDIT and OOWRITER. I noticed that I was able to reproduce the problem there as well. The font on the screen is liberation sans but the same thing happens with other fonts such as Arial taken directly from MS Windows. Do you still want me to try firefox beta? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 473836] Fonts in firefox look blurry
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473836 --- Comment #18 from Andrzej Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 18:01:44 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=326422) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=326422) blurry fonts in oowriter - notice the shaded I, or shades inside the H -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 472635] Google Droid fonts licensing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472635 Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|VERIFIED|CLOSED Resolution||UPSTREAM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 473836] Fonts in firefox look blurry
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473836 --- Comment #20 from Andrzej Nowak [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 18:04:56 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=326424) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=326424) blurry fonts in seamonkey completely unusable :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 18:03:38 EDT --- Infra did its bit, so here is a new version with the fedorahosted references fixed http://nim.fedorapeople.org/fontpackages/fontpackages.spec http://nim.fedorapeople.org/fontpackages/fontpackages-1.10-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 23:08:36 EDT --- Thanks for this package. The font packaging guidelines always seemed like a maze to me. I hope this will make things a lot easier. I have a few comments and questions: * rpmlint says: fontpackages-devel.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided rpm-fonts-devel fontpackages-filesystem.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided rpm-fonts-filesystem Is there a particular reason why you don't provide the obsoletes? I also can't seem to find these packages in our db. Do we really need these obsoletes? fontpackages-filesystem.noarch: W: no-documentation This can be ignored. * The license tag should be: LGPLv3+ * We prefer %defattr(-,root,root,-) * Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The directories: /usr/share/fonts. /etc/fonts/conf.d are already owned by filesystem and fontconfig. Why share the ownership? - Suggestion: Since you are the upstream, you can provide a Makefile in the source so that you don't have to do those tricks in the SPEC file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 463036] LiberationSans-Bold 'u' and 'W' blurred in smaller sizes.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463036 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-09 23:38:59 EDT --- liberation-fonts-1.04.92-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 463036] LiberationSans-Bold 'u' and 'W' blurred in smaller sizes.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463036 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 02:14:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Thanks for this package. The font packaging guidelines always seemed like a maze to me. I hope this will make things a lot easier. I have a few comments and questions: * rpmlint says: fontpackages-devel.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided rpm-fonts-devel fontpackages-filesystem.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided rpm-fonts-filesystem Is there a particular reason why you don't provide the obsoletes? rpm-fonts does not exist in the repo and should not exist. These obsoletes are only there for the people who have played with early versions of this package. I've always intended to remove them shortly, and did so now. * The license tag should be: LGPLv3+ * We prefer %defattr(-,root,root,-) Those are the correct permission and there is no drawback, and lots of advantages, in not specifying them. * Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The directories: /usr/share/fonts. /etc/fonts/conf.d are already owned by filesystem and fontconfig. Why share the ownership? As posted on the guideline change plan they will be removed from those other packages after this one is available to keep font policy in a single place. - Suggestion: Since you are the upstream, you can provide a Makefile in the source so that you don't have to do those tricks in the SPEC file. You'll find out that to keep directory info in a single place, the macro file, you'd need to play rpm tricks in this Makefile, and at this point it's stupid to do it out of rpm spec space New packages http://nim.fedorapeople.org/fontpackages/fontpackages.spec http://nim.fedorapeople.org/fontpackages/fontpackages-1.11-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 475593] Review Request: fontpackages - Common directory and macro definitions used by font packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475593 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-12-10 02:53:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) (In reply to comment #3) * Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The directories: /usr/share/fonts. /etc/fonts/conf.d are already owned by filesystem and fontconfig. Why share the ownership? As posted on the guideline change plan they will be removed from those other packages after this one is available to keep font policy in a single place. Sorry, I missed that part. - Suggestion: Since you are the upstream, you can provide a Makefile in the source so that you don't have to do those tricks in the SPEC file. You'll find out that to keep directory info in a single place, the macro file, you'd need to play rpm tricks in this Makefile, and at this point it's stupid to do it out of rpm spec space It was just my suggestion and I respect your decision. I'll approve the package as soon as I see the official FPC announcement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Re: OBS
Mike McGrath wrote: We're actually working on some things with them for stuff like this. Common macros for example. Any references to public discussions? It would be nice to include other RPM distributions like Mandriva and PLD in these efforts. Rahul ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: OBS
On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Rahul Sundaram wrote: Mike McGrath wrote: We're actually working on some things with them for stuff like this. Common macros for example. Any references to public discussions? It would be nice to include other RPM distributions like Mandriva and PLD in these efforts. Just in irc chatrooms. I was in the opensuse buildsystem channel the other day chatting about macros. -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
update announcements
Hi guys, is there any mailing list, where list of released package updates is propagated? Something similar as rawhide report. Thanks in advance! David -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: update announcements
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 09:00:51 +0100 David Hláčik wrote: is there any mailing list, where list of released package updates is propagated? fedora-updates -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com DRY CLEANER BUSINESS FOR SALE ~ http://www.canadadrycleanerforsale.com -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: desktop search in F10?
On Monday 08 December 2008 13:14:41 Neal Becker wrote: What is the status of desktop search in f10? I'm using kde. What utiltities should be used, and what kde apps will make use of them? (I'm wondering if akonadi tray utility is the thing to use) http://userbase.kde.org/Glossary#Strigi See also http://userbase.kde.org/Glossary#Nepomuk I don't know their current status, though. Anne signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Workaround for Ksynaptics. (Was preventing people from making a mistake)
Claude Jones wrote: Having followed this thread, and having set up the *.fdi file as you suggest later in this thread, and now, using ksynaptics, I have control over my touchpad. Could you discuss the specific possible dangers that now exist because I've enabled the insecure SHMConfig? What sorts of exploits are actually possible in this scenario? Well, ask those who disabled SHMConfig by default, they know the details, I don't. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Nautilus doesn't start
Suddenly when I open a session I get: Non è possibile usare Nautilus adesso, a causa di un errore imprevisto di Bonobo durante il tentativo di individuare la fabbrica. Per risolvere il problema, potrebbe essere d'aiuto terminare il processo «bonobo-activation-server» e riavviare Nautilus. It is not possible to use Nautilus now, due to an unforeseen error of Bonobo during try to get the make.To solve the problem, it could help to kill bonobo-activation-server and restart Nautilus. This happened suddenly on two of my systems both in F10 and Rawhide Any hint?? -- Antonio Montagnani Skype : antoniomontag -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Nautilus doesn't start
2008/12/9 Antonio M [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Suddenly when I open a session I get: Non è possibile usare Nautilus adesso, a causa di un errore imprevisto di Bonobo durante il tentativo di individuare la fabbrica. Per risolvere il problema, potrebbe essere d'aiuto terminare il processo «bonobo-activation-server» e riavviare Nautilus. It is not possible to use Nautilus now, due to an unforeseen error of Bonobo during try to get the make.To solve the problem, it could help to kill bonobo-activation-server and restart Nautilus. This happened suddenly on two of my systems both in F10 and Rawhide Any hint?? -- Antonio Montagnani Skype : antoniomontag and when I restart Nautilus on my laptop I get:: $ nautilus ** (nautilus:3228): WARNING **: Unable to add monitor: Non supportato It worked for years -- Antonio Montagnani Skype : antoniomontag -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F10: Can't add printer on fresh install
Am Montag, den 08.12.2008, 23:16 + schrieb Tim Waugh: On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 12:36 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: I am in this same boat, with an FU8 install, even setting selinux to permissive doesn't give cups the rights to setup a new printer, it is still being denied. From the /var/log/cups/error_log: E [03/Dec/2008:22:22:38 -0500] Pause-Printer: Unauthorized E [03/Dec/2008:22:23:36 -0500] CUPS-Add-Modify-Printer: Unauthorized E [03/Dec/2008:22:26:58 -0500] CUPS-Add-Modify-Printer: Unauthorized E [03/Dec/2008:22:28:11 -0500] CUPS-Add-Modify-Printer: Unauthorized Gene, that sounds like a different bug, one not currently reported. Just to complete my bug report, i have SELinux disabled. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
[FC10] Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10
Hi, I can't update FC10. Here is error: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]# yum update Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check -- Processing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 for package: gnome-packagekit --- Package transmission.i386 0:1.40-1.fc10 set to be updated --- Package PackageKit-yum.i386 0:0.3.11-4.fc10 set to be updated --- Package pangomm.i386 0:2.14.1-1.fc10 set to be updated --- Package crontabs.noarch 0:1.10-25.fc10 set to be updated --- Package PackageKit-yum-plugin.i386 0:0.3.11-4.fc10 set to be updated --- Package cjkunifonts-uming.noarch 0:0.2.20080216.1-10.fc10 set to be updated --- Package PackageKit-glib.i386 0:0.3.11-4.fc10 set to be updated --- Package gnome-settings-daemon.i386 0:2.24.1-3.fc10 set to be updated --- Package gtkmm24.i386 0:2.14.3-1.fc10 set to be updated --- Package PackageKit-udev-helper.i386 0:0.3.11-4.fc10 set to be updated --- Package PackageKit.i386 0:0.3.11-4.fc10 set to be updated -- Finished Dependency Resolution gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 from installed has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 is needed by package gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 is needed by package gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 (installed) Any idea ? -- http://vnoss.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F10 and beagle?
2008/12/9 Brian Mury [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 13:30 +0100, Niels Weber wrote: Clicking on run seems to start the service, but half a minute later it has again stopped. The same happens, when I start beagled from the command line. beagled runs for about a minute here. I was going to post a message tonight, but you beat me to it... From my beagle logs: current-Beagle: 20081207 21:58:48.4476 05607 Beagle INFO: Starting Beagle Daemon (version 0.3.8) 20081207 21:58:48.4990 05607 Beagle INFO: Running on Mono 2.0.1 20081207 21:58:48.5096 05607 Beagle INFO: Command Line: /usr/lib/beagle/BeagleDaemon.exe --replace --bg 20081207 21:58:52.2820 05607 Beagle WARN: Inotify watches may be too low (8192) for some users! Increase it to at least 65535 by setting fs.inotify.max_user_watches in /etc/sysctl.conf beagled will run in the background. Use beagle-status to check progress of beagled. For log files check /home/bmury/.beagle/Log/current-Beagle. I have noticed that warning as well. Does the change recommended help? I set that variable and the warning disappears but still beagled stops running after about half a minute. Niels -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Experience with x86_64-only (no i386) in F10?
2008/12/8 Steve Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 1. In prior versions of Fedora there was no provision for doing a 64-bit-only installation. You had to do a standard x86_64 install, then erase all the i386/i686 RPMs. Is that still the case, or can I opt at installation to only install x86_64 and noarch packages? I did a 64bit install and there don't seem to be any 32bit binaries (if you don't install them by hand, they are in the repositories). 2. What functionality will I be giving up to go 64-bit-only? In times past the immediate answers to this was Flash Player and the Sun JVM browser plug-in. Between the alpha 64-bit Flash Player (which I've been successfully using for 3 weeks) and IcedTea, these drawbacks seem to have been resolved. Anything else? All 32bit binary programs you want to run will not work. Mostly that will be commercial games, but if you don't use those... Nels -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10
On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 16:04:17 -0300, iarly wrote: Try to download the dependence directly: # yum install PackageKit-glib and then # yum install gnome-packagekit Something like that won't help with broken dependencies. You show that you've not understand the problem. Your suggestion cannot (!) fix it. Similary, the people who suggest to remove something and reinstall it, it does not and cannot solve these problems. In this case you need to wait for a newer gnome-packagekit to arrive in the repositories: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PackageKit-0.3.12-1.fc10,gnome-packagekit-0.3.12-1.fc10,kpackagekit-0.3.1-9.fc10 I've pointed to work-arounds in older replies, fwiw. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
fglrx
Hi guys, is this ATI driver working in Fedora 10? Thanks -- Forwarded message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 9:46 AM Subject: RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2008-12-07 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: 8 fglrx-kmod-8.552-1.8.11.fc10.5 madwifi-kmod-0.9.4-60.r3861_20080903.fc10.12 nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.15-1.fc10.6 nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.09-1.fc10.7 nvidia-beta-kmod-177.61.02-2.fc10.6 nvidia-kmod-177.82-1.fc10.6 slmodem-kmod-2.9.11-26.fc10.12 wl-kmod-5.10.27.6-5.fc10.7 Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: fglrx-kmod-8.552-1.8.11.fc10.5 -- * Sat Dec 06 2008 Thorsten Leemhuis fedora [AT] leemhuis [DOT] info - 8.552-1.8.11.5 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; madwifi-kmod-0.9.4-60.r3861_20080903.fc10.12 * Sat Dec 06 2008 Thorsten Leemhuis fedora [AT] leemhuis [DOT] info - 0.9.4-60.r3861_20080903.12 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.15-1.fc10.6 * Sat Dec 06 2008 Thorsten Leemhuis fedora [AT] leemhuis [DOT] info - 173.14.15-1.6 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.09-1.fc10.7 -- * Sat Dec 06 2008 Thorsten Leemhuis fedora [AT] leemhuis [DOT] info - 96.43.09-1.7 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; nvidia-beta-kmod-177.61.02-2.fc10.6 --- * Sat Dec 06 2008 Thorsten Leemhuis fedora [AT] leemhuis [DOT] info - 177.61.02-2.6 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; nvidia-kmod-177.82-1.fc10.6 --- * Sat Dec 06 2008 Thorsten Leemhuis fedora [AT] leemhuis [DOT] info - 177.82-1.6 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; slmodem-kmod-2.9.11-26.fc10.12 -- * Sat Dec 06 2008 Thorsten Leemhuis fedora [AT] leemhuis [DOT] info - 2.9.11-26.12 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; wl-kmod-5.10.27.6-5.fc10.7 -- * Sat Dec 06 2008 Thorsten Leemhuis fedora [AT] leemhuis [DOT] info - 5.10.27.6-5.7 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10
Armin Moradi wrote: On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear All, When I try yum install gnome-packagekit I get the following error: gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 from fedora has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 is needed by package gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 (fedora) Error: Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 is needed by package gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 (fedora) Getting exactly the same error msg. Joachim Backes [EMAIL PROTECTED] smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: problem with liberation fonts
David Hláčik wrote: Hello guys, i have problem with rendering of liberation fonts in Firefox Browser (latest in Fedora 10) Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.4) Gecko/2008111217 Fedora/3.0.4-1.fc10 Firefox/3.0.4. This is how letters u and R are rendered with freetype-freeworld package (subpixel smoothing and bytecode interpreter). http://www.hlacik.eu/example.png http://www.hlacik.eu/example2.png Please file a bug report in http://bugzilla.redhat.com Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: fglrx
On 09.12.2008 10:34, David Hláčik wrote: Hi guys, is this ATI driver working in Fedora 10? No -- that accidentally got build in the last kmod rebuild round and will get removed with the next push. Sorry, was my fault. CU knurd -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: [FC10] Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 10:09 +0100, Vnpenguin wrote: Hi, I can't update FC10. Here is error: You need this: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PackageKit-0.3.12-1.fc10,gnome-packagekit-0.3.12-1.fc10,kpackagekit-0.3.1-9.fc10 Richard. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Preupgrade using a local server.
Mikkel L. Ellertson wrote: I had missed the last line of the README - dumb me. Looking at it now, it looks like your advice is incomplete: Please note that /usr/share/preupgrade/releases.list is ignored and is only being shipped for compatibility reasons. Use ~/releases.txt for customization Ah, I knew the method was being changed but assumed it hadn't since the file existed. My bad. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: problem with liberation fonts
On 09.12.2008 10:44, Rahul Sundaram wrote: David Hláčik wrote: i have problem with rendering of liberation fonts in Firefox Browser (latest in Fedora 10) Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.4) Gecko/2008111217 Fedora/3.0.4-1.fc10 Firefox/3.0.4. This is how letters u and R are rendered with freetype-freeworld package (subpixel smoothing and bytecode interpreter). http://www.hlacik.eu/example.png http://www.hlacik.eu/example2.png Please file a bug report in http://bugzilla.redhat.com That bug will likely get not much attention and no friendly welcome if freetype-freeworld is installed :-/ But maybe I'm wrong with that; maybe it's worth a try, but I tend to say it best to test if the problem shows up also after uninstalling freetype-freeworld; if yes, file in http://bugzilla.redhat.com (as Rahul suggested), otherwise http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.com is likely the better place. CU knurd -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: problem with liberation fonts
Well, but it is for sure problem with liberation-fonts, which are not optimized for smoothing and apparently they are working on it , according to the latest update of liberation-fonts which is currently in updates-testing, where U letter is fixed, although it looks ugly - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=73981 Thanks, D. On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 09.12.2008 10:44, Rahul Sundaram wrote: David Hláčik wrote: i have problem with rendering of liberation fonts in Firefox Browser (latest in Fedora 10) Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.4) Gecko/2008111217 Fedora/3.0.4-1.fc10 Firefox/3.0.4. This is how letters u and R are rendered with freetype-freeworld package (subpixel smoothing and bytecode interpreter). http://www.hlacik.eu/example.png http://www.hlacik.eu/example2.png Please file a bug report in http://bugzilla.redhat.com That bug will likely get not much attention and no friendly welcome if freetype-freeworld is installed :-/ But maybe I'm wrong with that; maybe it's worth a try, but I tend to say it best to test if the problem shows up also after uninstalling freetype-freeworld; if yes, file in http://bugzilla.redhat.com (as Rahul suggested), otherwise http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.com is likely the better place. CU knurd -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: update announcements
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 09:00:51 +0100, David wrote: Hi guys, is there any mailing list, where list of released package updates is propagated? Something similar as rawhide report. http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-announce RSS channels: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ Test-Update release reports are mailed to fedora-test-list (unfortunately). -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: yum update errors (Fedora 10)
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 10:23 +, Dave Cross wrote: It's the kind of issue that will probably sort itself out in a day or two as the correct packages get pushed out. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PackageKit-0.3.12-1.fc10,gnome-packagekit-0.3.12-1.fc10,kpackagekit-0.3.1-9.fc10 Richard. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
how to turn off an onboard audio card
Could somebody please tell me how to turn off an onboard card because I have installed a new sound blaster card. I have a M2n mother board and I am on fedora ten. Thanks a lot. John brennan-sardou. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10
This package is in testing. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PackageKit-0.3.12-1.fc10,gnome-packagekit-0.3.12-1.fc10,kpackagekit-0.3.1-9.fc10 Regards, - iarly selbir ( Ski0s ) On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: On Mon, 8 Dec 2008 18:40:10 +, Paul wrote: Dear All, When I try yum install gnome-packagekit I get the following error: gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 from fedora has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 is needed by package gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 (fedora) Error: Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 is needed by package gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 (fedora) Any ideas? A PackageKit update that should have been released together with other packages (gnome-packagekit e.g.). The Fedora Updates System caused some chaos: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-10978 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-10610 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: How to get rid of selinux
On Tuesday 09 December 2008 01:06:22 am gab_v wrote: Dear all, I have a Fedora 9 distr. I've lot of problem with SELinux, so I want to know how to get rid of it. In particular I am interested NOT in make SELinux status Disabled but to uninstall it. I am not sure how to do it, also because I just started working with Linux OS. How can I do? The easy option: add selinux=0' to the kernel command line in /boot/grub/grub.conf. The hard option: rebuild the kernel without SELinux support. Either way, set SELinux to Disabled in /etc/selinux/config. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: KDE freezes after switching to text terminal and back to KDE
But the problem is on Kde or other fedora component?? Anybody know? Regards, - iarly selbir ( Ski0s ) On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 3:06 AM, dreamfire [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Hi Marcelo! Sorry but I can't reproduce it anymore. Yesterday some updates had been installed to the system. Now I doesn't get any backtrace in Xorg.log. The Problem has also changed a little bit. If I switch to the Console and then back, it takes about 1 minute and the screen gets back. (thats better than before :-D ) I also noticed that if I disable the Desktop Effects in System Settings the Problem disappears completely. Peter -- This is an email sent via The Fedora Community Portal https://fcp.surfsite.org https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?post_id=309991topic_id=64662forum=10#forumpost309991 If you think, this is spam, please report this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and/or blame [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 08:28:07 -0300, iarly wrote: This package is in testing. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PackageKit-0.3.12-1.fc10,gnome-packagekit-0.3.12-1.fc10,kpackagekit-0.3.1-9.fc10 No. It's still pending. Submitted for testing does not mean it is in the updates-testing repo yet. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F10: Can't add printer on fresh install
On Tuesday 09 December 2008, Schlueri wrote: Am Montag, den 08.12.2008, 23:16 + schrieb Tim Waugh: On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 12:36 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: I am in this same boat, with an FU8 install, even setting selinux to permissive doesn't give cups the rights to setup a new printer, it is still being denied. From the /var/log/cups/error_log: E [03/Dec/2008:22:22:38 -0500] Pause-Printer: Unauthorized E [03/Dec/2008:22:23:36 -0500] CUPS-Add-Modify-Printer: Unauthorized E [03/Dec/2008:22:26:58 -0500] CUPS-Add-Modify-Printer: Unauthorized E [03/Dec/2008:22:28:11 -0500] CUPS-Add-Modify-Printer: Unauthorized Gene, that sounds like a different bug, one not currently reported. The effect is the same, cups has no permissions to do the final writes that would enable the use of this printer. I ran into essentially the same thing when I went to setup my F10 machine to use the printer on this one, a share that has worked flawlessly for years, but now suddenly does not. Co-incidental to having a drive fail, and installing the Fedora Unity August 2008 respin of F8 on a fresh drive getting all my data back with amanda. It isn't exactly life and death that it doesn't work as I do have a working printer. But the security paranoia that seems to pervade the Fedora camp since the server hacking incident does seem to have something to do with this, and whomever installed these so-called security enhancements that are screwing with our ability to use the hardware we have purchased, surely must know by now that it is getting under our collective skins, and making this user who has been a RH-Fedora person since RH5.0, look carefully at other distros. Just to complete my bug report, i have SELinux disabled. And mine is set permissive ATM. Zero difference, I still have a printer I can't use. One that is about 20x faster than the one it lets me use. -- Cheers, Gene There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order. -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Forced to support NT servers; sysadmins quit. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: update announcements
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rss/rss2.0?release=F10status=stable returns 500 Internal error, D. On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 09:00:51 +0100, David wrote: Hi guys, is there any mailing list, where list of released package updates is propagated? Something similar as rawhide report. http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-announce RSS channels: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ Test-Update release reports are mailed to fedora-test-list (unfortunately). -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F10: Can't add printer on fresh install
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 07:44 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: The effect is the same, cups has no permissions to do the final writes that would enable the use of this printer. That's not the same effect -- it is a different bug. And mine is set permissive ATM. Zero difference, I still have a printer I can't use. One that is about 20x faster than the one it lets me use. Have you tried the printing troubleshooter? Tim. */ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: update announcements
I get same error today when tried it. Also, the http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/recentbuilds report the following errors: Mod_python error: PythonHandler mod_python.publisher Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/mod_python/apache.py, line 299, in HandlerDispatch result = object(req) File /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/mod_python/publisher.py, line 213, in handler published = publish_object(req, object) File /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/mod_python/publisher.py, line 412, in publish_object return publish_object(req,util.apply_fs_data(object, req.form, req=req)) File /usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/mod_python/util.py, line 439, in apply_fs_data return object(**args) File /usr/share/koji-web/scripts/index.py, line 1640, in recentbuilds values['weburl'] = _getBaseURL(req) File /usr/share/koji-web/scripts/index.py, line 117, in _getBaseURL return req.construct_url(base) AttributeError: 'mp_request' object has no attribute 'construct_url' Regards, - iarly selbir ( Ski0s ) On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:50 AM, David Hláčik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rss/rss2.0?release=F10status=stable returns 500 Internal error, D. On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 09:00:51 +0100, David wrote: Hi guys, is there any mailing list, where list of released package updates is propagated? Something similar as rawhide report. http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-announce RSS channels: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ Test-Update release reports are mailed to fedora-test-list (unfortunately). -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: KDE internationalization on a GNOME desktop
Hi Kevin, On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 23:30, Kevin Kofler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andre Costa wrote: I installed default F10 desktop, and all GNOME apps deal with localized chars such as 'é' as expected (I have a Brazilian ABNT2 keyboard). However, I run a couple of Qt apps (eg. Skype), and accent chars don't work as dead keys on them, eg. é comes out as 'e. I guess keyboard layout info is missing for Qt apps (xorg.conf doesn't have any keyboard configuration, and GNOME has its own configuration). This looks suspiciously like: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468590 Thks for the pointer, indeed it looks like it. I'd rather not have to install 54M just to be able to input accented chars on KDE apps ;-) Also, if this is indeed a bug related to X11 keyboard driver, those 54M would probably be useless... =/ Rex: is kdebase-workspace really the only alternative? Isn't there any config file I could manually edit? I'll add a comment on bug 468590 hoping it attracts some attention. Below follows the list of apps that need to be installed in order to satisfy kdebase-workspace dependencies: Installing: kdebase-workspace x86_64 4.1.3-6.fc10 updates 10 M Installing for dependencies: akonadix86_64 1.0.0-4.fc10 fedora 472 k clucene-core x86_64 0.9.21-1.fc10 fedora 347 k kde-filesystem noarch 4-20.fc10 fedora 20 k kde-settings noarch 4.1-4.20081031svn.fc10 fedora 33 k kde-settings-kdm noarch 4.1-4.20081031svn.fc10 fedora 22 k kdebase-runtimex86_64 4.1.3-1.fc10 updates 5.8 M kdebase-runtime-libs x86_64 4.1.3-1.fc10 updates 691 k kdebase-workspace-libs x86_64 4.1.3-6.fc10 updates 1.1 M kdelibsx86_64 6:4.1.3-3.fc10 updates 12 M kdelibs-common x86_64 6:4.1.3-3.fc10 updates 261 k kdepimlibs x86_64 4.1.3-1.fc10 updates 2.4 M ksysguardd x86_64 4.1.3-6.fc10 updates 69 k libcapseo x86_64 0.2.0-0.2.20080603gita6ec446.fc10 fedora 25 k libcaptury x86_64 0.3.0-0.1.20080323gitcca4e3c.fc10 fedora 20 k oxygen-icon-theme noarch 4.1.3-1.fc10 updates 13 M phonon x86_64 4.2.0-7.fc10 fedora 137 k phonon-backend-xinex86_64 4.1.3-1.fc10 updates 132 k qimageblitzx86_64 0.0.4-0.4.svn706674.fc9fedora 54 k qt-mysql x86_64 1:4.4.3-6.fc10 updates 46 k solar-backgrounds-common noarch 0.92.0-1.fc10 fedora 5.2 M solar-kde-themenoarch 0.1.16-2.fc10 fedora 602 k sopranox86_64 2.1.1-1.fc10 fedora 622 k strigi-libsx86_64 0.5.11-1.fc10 fedora 442 k xorg-x11-apps x86_64 7.3-5.fc10 fedora 276 k xorg-x11-xdm x86_64 1:1.1.6-4.fc10 fedora 141 k Transaction Summary Install 26 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 54 M Regards, Andre -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: [FC10] Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 11:19 +0100, Vnpenguin wrote: I think Fedora's repos need that, not me personally :-) Heh, you know what I mean :-) Should sync to the repo tonight. Richard. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F-9 to F-10 preupgrade is rather mean
David Timms wrote: I noticed that the preupgrade install carefully removed all F-9 boot material - not only vmlinuz and initrd, but also the /lib/modules/ files. Unless something was changed recently, the idea is that pre-upgrade simply retrieves the minimal rpms needed to upgrade a specific system, then adds an additional grub boot item for upgrade. When you reboot and choose upgrade, essentially a normal anaconda based upgrade occurs, with the same questions you'd normally get, and the same result. I was not asked any questions when I re-booted after running preupgrade. The system immediately launched into an enormous updating saga. Normally, if I do a clean install I am asked if I want to format /boot or leave it as it is. I always choose the latter. This leaves old kernels in place, though it does remove reference to them from grub.conf, IIRC. However, it leaves the old grub.conf as grub.conf.rpmsave , and it is easy to merge the two. /lib/modules comes from the kernel, so I would expect to only have modules for the most recent installed kernel in there after the upgrade. I have noticed during install/upgrade that kernel install occurs 80% into the process; did your install finish normally ? Yes, everything seemed to end normally. But you seem to be saying that what did occur is what should have occurred. I'm saying that it doesn't occur with a clean install; the old system (vmlinuz, initrd and /lib/modules) is left in place. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Live CD without CD?
Kevin Kofler wrote: stan wrote: title Fedora 7 install root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-f7-install askmethod initrd /initrd-f7-install.img That's for the installer, not the Live CD. So is it actually possible to boot from the hard disk, using the Live CD ISO file? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
F10 and Pulseaudio
Hi all, what is the state of Pulseaudio in F10? On my previous installation (F8) I disabled PA after a short test as there where to many problems with it. On my fresh install of F10 I have it currently enabled, thinking that it should be more mature by now. At first it had the wrong soundcard as a default device, this was easily changed and is no real bug (although perhaps the installer should ask which soundcard should be used if there is more than one). Rhythmbox and mplayer now have sound (but only stereo instead of 5.1 it seems), so that's fine. All games have no sound though, even those installed from the Fedora repository (for example Battle for Wesnoth). I can understand if third-party software still has problems with PA, but shouldn't at least the games that are shipped with the distribution work with the default sound setup? How to fix this? Uninstall PA again? Niels -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: How to get rid of selinux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 gab_v wrote: Dear all, I have a Fedora 9 distr. I've lot of problem with SELinux, so I want to know how to get rid of it. In particular I am interested NOT in make SELinux status Disabled but to uninstall it. I am not sure how to do it, also because I just started working with Linux OS. How can I do? I was thinking about doing rpm -qa |grep SELinux and then rpm -e ... But will it be enough? I want to do very safe commands since I need the computer at work. Thanks in advance p.s. I said not how to disabled SELinux because I did it once and I did not solve the problem and, after that, I had a block at boot process. libselinux is a core library of the Fedora System and some other Linux Distributes, it can not be removed. Policycoreutils includes restorecon command which has been required by several other packages, so it can not be removed either. You should be able to remove other selinux packages. yum remove selinux-poliycy Should remove the policy package which is the largest package. We have not heard of SELinux disabled problems in years so saying it caused you problems a while ago, probably was a very old version of Fedora or was not an SELinux problem in the first place, or you really did not have SELinux disabled. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkk+dxkACgkQrlYvE4MpobNOwwCg1hwqQMIWq+dHgdO8PrAdfmyo 0rEAni24yPzYlms2d1FYJdbwxw9UziVj =niOr -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F10: Can't add printer on fresh install
On Tuesday 09 December 2008, Tim Waugh wrote: On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 07:44 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: The effect is the same, cups has no permissions to do the final writes that would enable the use of this printer. That's not the same effect -- it is a different bug. And mine is set permissive ATM. Zero difference, I still have a printer I can't use. One that is about 20x faster than the one it lets me use. Have you tried the printing troubleshooter? Never heard of it, please tell me more, keeping in mind this is _supposedly_ an uptodate F8 box, that won't let me add this printer, and the machine I was trying to set this up so I could print from it to here is a fresh but badly broken, F10 install from the dvd. Two completely separate problems no doubt. :( Thanks. Tim. */ -- Cheers, Gene There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order. -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Used staples are good with SOY SAUCE! -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: SSH Crashes When ypbind is running on 64 Bit Fedora 10
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 07:06:26 +0100 Aaron Greenwood (agreenwo) wrote: Anyone else have this problem? If so have you solved it? It is probably a known bug which should be fixed by a new glibc coming to a repo real soon now: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473073 The quick fix is to remove the nis option from hosts: line in /etc/nnswitch.conf (which only works if you don't use nis for hostnames, of course :-). -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Turn off animations in FireFox
How are animations disabled in Firefox? Thanks. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Workaround for Ksynaptics. (Was preventing people from making a mistake)
On Tuesday 09 December 2008, Kevin Kofler wrote: Gene Heskett wrote: On Monday 08 December 2008, Kevin Kofler wrote: Using xorg.conf for input configuration is obsolete and should no longer be done. And for which release is this valid? ATM, my lappy has F8 on it. Those with input hotplug, i.e. F9 and above. Kevin Kofler Not applicable then, yet... Thanks Kevin. -- Cheers, Gene There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order. -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Wash: Oh my god, it's grotesque! Oh, and there's something in a jar. --Episode #12, The Message -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Crackling sound in games, pulseaudio CPU usage high (F10)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Eggers schrieb: On Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:20:11 +, NM wrote: On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 22:31:33 +, NMONNET wrote: Thanks a lot, it seems to be working. ☺ Well actually I now get this filling up my messages: Dec 2 15:16:34 ws pulseaudio[30881]: module-alsa-sink.c: ALSA woke us up to write new data to the device, but there was actually nothing to write! Most likely this is an ALSA driver bug. Please report this issue to the PulseAudio developers. First of all, I had to add myself to the pulse-rt group in order to set my Gnome sound to the pulse audio server. I occasionally get these messages. Like you, the frequency increased dramatically when I added tsched=0 to my /etc/pulse/default.pa file. Unfortunately for me, it did not reduce the CPU usage significantly when running Audacious configured for pulse audio. Adding tsched=0 did eliminate popping and crackling when running Rhythmbox. Kaffine is rather strange. When configured to use the GStreamer engine, the pulse audio volume monitor shows the client as 'unknown'. When configured to use the xine engine, the pulse audio volume monitor shows the client as ALSA (expected). Basically, any music player that appears to use pulse audio directly causes pulse audio to use 13% - 16% CPU on a 2 GHz P6 ancient Dell system (playing a standard MP3 file). Attempting to use pulse audio with Xine generates an immediate segfault as shown in the /var/log/messages entry below. xine[25985]: segfault at 0 ip 0072b4dc sp b51bbe30 error 4 in libpulse.so.0.7.0[6cf000+6e000] While I like the concept of pulse audio, there seems to be some significant challenges (or at least a lack of understanding on my part). I'll write up more about my adventures with pulse audio in another message. /mde/ Just for the record: These problems are being tracked in redhat bugzilla [Bug 473080] libpulse segfaults on invalidated **environ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473080 [Bug 471964] Choppy sound and freeze for rhythmbox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471964 Best regards, Christian - -- He's an uncontrollable zombie cop from the Mississippi delta. She's a vivacious mute journalist from aristocratic European stock. They fight crime! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkk+ReUACgkQCNjA0nfhW7wE1ACgpoK0Mhu211mPJ9zctuXkBD7y a8cAnRg9BilIqzkZZtR7Mx+sBCg8kx6v =FUvY -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Turn off animations in FireFox
В Tue, 9 Dec 2008 05:18:19 -0500 Dave Feustel [EMAIL PROTECTED] пишет: How are animations disabled in Firefox? Thanks. 1) Type the address “about:config” into your address bar. 2) In the Filter field, enter “animation”. 3) Select image.animation_mode 4) Change its value from normal to none -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: How send special keystrokes to guest (w2k8) system?
Frantisek Hanzlik wrote: I just install w2k8 server guest at Fedora 10 host (HW:FS PRIMERGY SX330S1, 2x Quad Opteron 2352 with virtualization support) with kvm virtualization. All works probably fine, but I cann't send keystrokes as CTRL+ALT+DEL to guest. I tried: - disable handling special keys (CTRL+ALT+key) in X server (settable in GNOME keyboard properties) - use Send key feature in virt-manager v0.6.0 (offers sending CTRL+ALT+DEL, CTRL+ALT+Backspace, Printscreen and CTRL+ALT+Fx keystrokes) - somewhere mentioned CTRL+CTRL+CTRL+ALT+DEL combination but all without success. Probably I'm doing something wrong, can someone push me forward? On host I use Fedora 10 distro, 2.6.27.7-130.fc10.i686 SMP kernel, kvm-74-6.fc10.i386, libvirt-0.5.1-1.fc10.i386, virt-manager-0.6.0-4.fc10.i386 OK, solved - problem is probably in Fedora 10 gtk-vnc-0.3.7-3.fc10.i386 library, maybe in Fedora-special patches. When I compile and instal actual gtk-vnc v0.3.8 (without any additional patches), then all work fine. I will file bugzilla report about this. Franta Hanzlik -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
OpenVPN and FC System
Dear All, Is there any solution for installing OpenVPN with FC System ? Thanks ! Edward. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: OpenVPN and FC System
yum install openvpn:-) [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Dear All, Is there any solution for installing OpenVPN with FC System ? Thanks ! Edward. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10
Ok, sorry. I got it wrong. Regards, - iarly selbir ( Ski0s ) On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Michael Schwendt [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 08:28:07 -0300, iarly wrote: This package is in testing. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PackageKit-0.3.12-1.fc10,gnome-packagekit-0.3.12-1.fc10,kpackagekit-0.3.1-9.fc10 No. It's still pending. Submitted for testing does not mean it is in the updates-testing repo yet. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: yum update errors (Fedora 10)
2008/12/8 Kevin Kempter [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I ran yum update and got the below errors. Anyone have any thoughts / advice ? Thanks in advance # yum update [ snip ] Error: Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10()(64bit) is needed by package gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.x86_64 (installed) Error: Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-qt.so.10()(64bit) is needed by package kpackagekit-0.3.1-4.fc10.x86_64 (installed) I'm seeing the same thing. Looks like an incomplete set of packagekit updates has been pushed to the repos. There are news version of PackageKit-glib and PackageKit-qt, but no associated new versions of gnome-packagekit and kpackagekit. It's the kind of issue that will probably sort itself out in a day or two as the correct packages get pushed out. Dave... -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: OpenVPN and FC System
Luc MAIGNAN wrote: yum install openvpn:-) [EMAIL PROTECTED] a 嶰rit : Dear All, Is there any solution for installing OpenVPN with FC System ? Thanks ! Edward. Hello to you, Sorry... Solution for config Server ( FC System ) and Client ( Win 2k ) and SSL ( Server and Client )... Thanks ! Edward. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 10:44 +0100, Joachim Backes wrote: gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 from fedora has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 is needed by package gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 (fedora) Error: Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 is needed by package gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 (fedora) Getting exactly the same error msg. Try http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PackageKit-0.3.12-1.fc10,gnome-packagekit-0.3.12-1.fc10,kpackagekit-0.3.1-9.fc10 Richard. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
F9 does not boot this morning
F9 does not boot this morning. It does not get as far as enabling virtual consoles. I had to boot a previous version to get X and logon. Is this related to the many error messages I am getting since yesterday about a process being unable to close? Thanks. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F10: Can't add printer on fresh install
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 08:51 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: Never heard of it, please tell me more, keeping in mind this is _supposedly_ an uptodate F8 box, System-Administration-Printing from the main menu, then Help-Troubleshoot from the menu bar. Tim. */ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: KDE internationalization on a GNOME desktop
Andre Costa wrote: Rex: is kdebase-workspace really the only alternative? Isn't there any config file I could manually edit? You could, but I don't know what the file is or what gets set. kdebase-workspace's systemsettings is still the safest alternative. -- Rex -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: [FC10] Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Richard Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 10:09 +0100, Vnpenguin wrote: Hi, I can't update FC10. Here is error: You need this: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/PackageKit-0.3.12-1.fc10,gnome-packagekit-0.3.12-1.fc10,kpackagekit-0.3.1-9.fc10 Richard. I think Fedora's repos need that, not me personally :-) -- http://vnoss.org -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: KDE freezes after switching to text terminal and back to KDE
My card driver is intel: # lspci -v 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile GM965/GL960 Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 0c) (prog- if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: COMPAL Electronics Inc Device 0024 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 16 Memory at f800 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1M] Memory at d000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M] I/O ports at 1800 [size=8] Capabilities: access denied Kernel modules: intelfb Regards, - iarly selbir ( Ski0s ) On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: iarly selbir wrote: But the problem is on Kde or other fedora component?? Anybody know? 95% odds are that it's your X video driver at issue (esp if using compositing or desktop effects). -- Rex -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: how to turn off an onboard audio card
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 9:09 AM, johnbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could somebody please tell me how to turn off an onboard card because I have installed a new sound blaster card. I have a M2n mother board and I am on fedora ten. Thanks a lot. John brennan-sardou. In the BIOS. But you can use both cards on F10, and use pulseaudio to switch between them on the fly. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: OpenVPN and FC System
Original Message Subject: Re: OpenVPN and FC System From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora. fedora-list@redhat.com Date: 12/09/2008 08:09 AM Hello to you, Sorry... Solution for config Server ( FC System ) and Client ( Win 2k ) and SSL ( Server and Client )... Thanks ! Edward. Google search[1]. [1] http://www.google.com/search?q=openvpn+windows+client -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Experience with x86_64-only (no i386) in F10?
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Niels Weber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All 32bit binary programs you want to run will not work. I think you mean not all 32-bit programs you want to run will work. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F10: Can't add printer on fresh install
On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 08:51 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: On Tuesday 09 December 2008, Tim Waugh wrote: On Tue, 2008-12-09 at 07:44 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: The effect is the same, cups has no permissions to do the final writes that would enable the use of this printer. That's not the same effect -- it is a different bug. And mine is set permissive ATM. Zero difference, I still have a printer I can't use. One that is about 20x faster than the one it lets me use. Have you tried the printing troubleshooter? Never heard of it, please tell me more, keeping in mind this is _supposedly_ an uptodate F8 box, that won't let me add this printer, and the machine I was trying to set this up so I could print from it to here is a fresh but badly broken, F10 install from the dvd. Two completely separate problems no doubt. :( Thanks. trouble shooting seems like a good idea but exactly what are you doing to add the printer? -- === Q: Why did Menachem Begin invade Lebanon? A: To impress Jodie Foster. === Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10
iarly selbir wrote: are you using ( or have installed ) third-part repositories? check with following command: # yum repolist Regards, - iarly selbir ( Ski0s ) On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Paul Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear All, When I try yum install gnome-packagekit I get the following error: gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 from fedora has depsolving problems -- Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 is needed by package gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 (fedora) Error: Missing Dependency: libpackagekit-glib.so.10 is needed by package gnome-packagekit-0.3.9-8.fc10.i386 (fedora) Any ideas? Thanks in advance, Paul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines I also am having problems with FC10 update and packagekit dependencies and I don't use anything but fedora, rpmfusion, and livna repos. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Some people mis interpret Fedora's Mission Statement.
Kevin Kofler wrote: Arthur Pemberton wrote: I mean (as an example) I would like to see Fedora shift focus to Qt and KDE, but that isn't going to happen, not because there are rules against, just because there is no one to push the work necessary for that, and I am not yet capable of it myself. Uh, we would very much be willing to do that in KDE SIG. It's not going to happen because there is pressure from above to focus on GNOME, not because the manpower to focus on KDE is not there (which is not the case). I think, you are being unrealistic. Within Fedora, there is definitely more man power for GNOME than any other desktop environment since there is many more people working full time on that. That is unlikely to change. Red Hat has hired more people in KDE as well but it is not the same amount of resources. This is not a slight against the KDE SIG which has been very proactive but just a reflection of the facts. Just look at how we have been able to consistently produce a KDE spin with no showstoppers since Fedora 7 and how we are constantly keeping KDE up to date in releases (even to an extent the GNOME folks aren't doing, see e.g. the upgrade from KDE 4.0 to 4.1 in Fedora 9). No showstoppers is definitely relative. KDE 4.0.x in Fedora 9 was controversial. I dont consider that a packaging issue however. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F-9 to F-10 preupgrade is rather mean
Timothy Murphy wrote: I was not asked any questions when I re-booted after running preupgrade. The system immediately launched into an enormous updating saga. Err, no. It doesn't. What it does is set grub to boot Anaconda by default and point Anaconda to the local copy of the newer packages. You can choose in grub to continue using the older version. Have done so several times. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Crackling sound in games, pulseaudio CPU usage high (F10)
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 11:18:16 +0100, Christian Nolte wrote: Just for the record: These problems are being tracked in redhat bugzilla [Bug 473080] libpulse segfaults on invalidated **environ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473080 [Bug 471964] Choppy sound and freeze for rhythmbox https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471964 Best regards, Christian Thanks for the pointers. Still haven't found a fix. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Fedora 10 kickstart install ignoring updates repository
On Dec 9, 2008, at 2:07 AM, David Timms wrote: Peter Schwenk wrote: being ignored. I know this because I do an ALT-F3 to look at the console messages, and I see one that says ignoring duplicate repository updates with URL ['http://ip.of.my.server/path/to/Package_and_repodata_for_updates' ]. I don't understand how this repository is being considered a duplicate since the install repository and this one have different contents. I think I remember seeing the updates repo being on the repo setup screen. Was that enabled as well as your local mirror update repo ? DaveT. Yep, I added a repo line for it in my kickstart file. The console message shows that it looked at the repo but ignored it because it considered it to be a duplicate. My install repo and the updates repo certainly aren't the same, but something makes the install think it is. -- Peter Schwenk Campus IT Associate 3 Mathematical Sciences University of Delaware Newark, DE 19716-2553 schwenk _at_ math _dot_ udel _dot_ edu http://www.math.udel.edu/~schwenk (302) 831-0437 (v) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Some people mis interpret Fedora's Mission Statement.
Rahul Sundaram wrote: Kevin Kofler wrote: Uh, we would very much be willing to do that in KDE SIG. It's not going to happen because there is pressure from above to focus on GNOME, not because the manpower to focus on KDE is not there (which is not the case). I think, you are being unrealistic. Within Fedora, there is definitely more man power for GNOME than any other desktop environment since there is many more people working full time on that. Isn't that what is meant by pressure from above? Surely the main determinant should be what users want? My strong impression from reading the newsgroups is that a large majority of enthusiasts are using KDE, despite the fact that this is not the default. There seems to me some political or philosophical argument, which I do not understand, behind the official preference for Gnome. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: OpenVPN and FC System
On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 22:09:56 +0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Luc MAIGNAN wrote: yum install openvpn:-) [EMAIL PROTECTED] a 嶰rit : Dear All, Is there any solution for installing OpenVPN with FC System ? Thanks ! Edward. Hello to you, Sorry... Solution for config Server ( FC System ) and Client ( Win 2k ) and SSL ( Server and Client )... http://www.openvpn.net/index.php/documentation/howto.html ? --Frank Elsner -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
