Re: unowned files and directories
On 23.5.2009 19:46, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: Hi! I now and then check which files on my systems are not owned by any RPM package. That often turns up a lot's of old and obsolete stuff that sometimes eats space I'd like to free. During those checks I often find lots of files and directories that obviously should be owned by some packages but aren't. You should contact Michael Schwendt, he has done a lot of work in this -- and IIRC he is still doing periodic checks in this area. Regards, Milos -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: PolicyKit changes in F12
Matthias Clasen wrote: It took me a couple of evenings to write patches for the majority of polkit users in gnome Several of your porting patches just drop PolicyKit support entirely (so it looks to me like either it's actually more work to port to the new PolicyKit than you claim or the new PolicyKit is just not powerful enough to support everything the old one did, both of which would be bad things). Kevin Kofler -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
[Bug 502290] New: [or_IN][GSUB] The font shape is not correct with U+0B2E U+0B4D U+0B2C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: [or_IN][GSUB] The font shape is not correct with U+0B2E U+0B4D U+0B2C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502290 Summary: [or_IN][GSUB] The font shape is not correct with U+0B2E U+0B4D U+0B2C Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: pango AssignedTo: besfa...@redhat.com ReportedBy: kxi...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: besfa...@redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description of problem: In gedit input U+0B2E U+0B4D U+0B2C,the font shape is not same with image. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): pango-devel-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pango-1.22.1-1.fc10.i386 pangomm-2.14.0-2.fc10.i386 How reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1.In gedit input U+0B2E U+0B4D U+0B2C ମ୍ବ Actual results: The font is not the same with image Expected results: The font is the same with image. Additional info: U+0B15 U+0B4D U+0B2C କ୍ବ U+0B15 U+0B4D U+0B30 କ୍ର all have the problem I will attach the error and correct font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 502290] [or_IN][GSUB] The font shape is not correct with U+0B2E U+0B4D U+0B2C
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502290 --- Comment #1 from koka xiong kxi...@redhat.com 2009-05-23 04:15:52 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=345182) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345182) error and correct font -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel bitstream-vera-fonts.spec, 1.15, 1.16 import.log, 1.4, 1.5
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11538/devel
Modified Files:
bitstream-vera-fonts.spec import.log
Log Message:
clean up pre-F11 compatibility metapackage goo
Index: bitstream-vera-fonts.spec
===
RCS file:
/cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel/bitstream-vera-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -p -r1.15 -r1.16
--- bitstream-vera-fonts.spec 24 Feb 2009 04:53:12 - 1.15
+++ bitstream-vera-fonts.spec 23 May 2009 13:07:05 - 1.16
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ at %{url} for details.
Name:%{fontname}-fonts
Version: 1.10
-Release: 16%{?dist}
+Release: 17%{?dist}
Summary: Bitstream Vera fonts
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -25,21 +25,10 @@ BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel
%common_desc
-%package compat
-Summary: Bitstream Vera, compatibility
-
-Obsoletes: bitstream-vera-fonts 1.10-9
-Requires: %{fontname}-sans-fonts, %{fontname}-serif-fonts,
%{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts
-
-%description compat
-This package only exists to help transition pre 1.10-9 Bitstream Vera users to
-the new package split. It will be removed after one distribution release cycle,
-please do not reference it or depend on it in any way.
-
-
%package common
-Summary: Common files of the Bitstream Vera font set
-Requires: fontpackages-filesystem
+Summary: Common files of the Bitstream Vera font set
+Requires: fontpackages-filesystem
+Obsoletes: %{name}-compat 1.10-17
%description common
%common_desc
@@ -106,16 +95,19 @@ install -m 0644 -p *.ttf %{buildroot}%{_
rm -fr %{buildroot}
-%files compat
-
-
%files common
%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
%doc *.TXT
%changelog
-* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 1.10-16
+* Sat May 23 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
+- 1.10-17
+â remove pre-F11 compatibility metapackage
+
+
+* Mon Feb 23 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
+- 1.10-16
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild
* Mon Feb 16 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Index: import.log
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/bitstream-vera-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -p -r1.4 -r1.5
--- import.log 23 Feb 2009 08:28:35 - 1.4
+++ import.log 23 May 2009 13:07:05 - 1.5
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ bitstream-vera-fonts-1_10-12_fc11:HEAD:b
bitstream-vera-fonts-1_10-13_fc11:HEAD:bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-13.fc11.src.rpm:1231979242
bitstream-vera-fonts-1_10-14_fc11:HEAD:bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-14.fc11.src.rpm:1232062969
bitstream-vera-fonts-1_10-15_fc11:HEAD:bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-15.fc11.src.rpm:1235377691
+bitstream-vera-fonts-1_10-17_fc12:HEAD:bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-17.fc12.src.rpm:1243083967
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel dejavu-fonts.spec, 1.100, 1.101 import.log, 1.15, 1.16
Author: nim
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13129/devel
Modified Files:
dejavu-fonts.spec import.log
Log Message:
clean up pre-F11 compatibility metapackage goo
Index: dejavu-fonts.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/dejavu-fonts.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.100
retrieving revision 1.101
diff -u -p -r1.100 -r1.101
--- dejavu-fonts.spec 15 Mar 2009 18:51:58 - 1.100
+++ dejavu-fonts.spec 23 May 2009 13:14:43 - 1.101
@@ -17,18 +17,10 @@ The DejaVu font set is based on the âB
purpose is to provide a wider range of characters, while maintaining the \
original style, using an open collaborative development process.
-# Compat description
-%global compat_desc \
-This package only exists to help transition pre 2.26-3 DejaVu users to the new\
-package split. It will be removed after one distribution release cycle, please\
-do not reference it or depend on it in any way.\
-\
-It can be safely uninstalled.
-
Name:%{fontname}-fonts
Version: 2.29
-Release: 2%{?alphatag}%{?dist}
+Release: 3%{?alphatag}%{?dist}
Summary: DejaVu fonts
Group: User Interface/X
@@ -50,38 +42,13 @@ BuildRequires: fontpackages-devel
%common_desc
-%package compat
-Summary: DejaVu fonts compatibility package
-
-Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts 2.26-3
-Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts-experimental 2.26-3
-
-Requires: %{fontname}-sans-fonts
-Requires: %{fontname}-sans-mono-fonts
-Requires: %{fontname}-serif-fonts
-
-%description compat
-%compat_desc
-
-
-%package lgc-compat
-Summary: DejaVu fonts, LGC compatibility package
-
-Obsoletes: dejavu-lgc-fonts 2.26-3
-
-Requires: %{fontname}-lgc-sans-fonts
-Requires: %{fontname}-lgc-sans-mono-fonts
-Requires: %{fontname}-lgc-serif-fonts
-
-%description lgc-compat
-%compat_desc
-
-
%package common
Summary: Common files for the Dejavu font set
Requires: fontpackages-filesystem
Obsoletes: dejavu-fonts-doc 2.26-6
+Obsoletes: %{name}-compat 2.29-3
+Obsoletes: %{name}-lgc-compat 2.29-3
%description common
%common_desc
@@ -231,10 +198,6 @@ done
rm -fr %{buildroot}
-%files compat
-%files lgc-compat
-
-
%files common
%defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
%doc AUTHORS BUGS LICENSE NEWS README
@@ -242,7 +205,12 @@ rm -fr %{buildroot}
%changelog
-* Sun Mar 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net - 2.29-2
+* Sat May 23 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
+- 1.29-3
+â remove pre-F11 compatibility metapackage
+
+* Sun Mar 15 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
+- 2.29-2
â Make sure F11 font packages have been built with F11 fontforge
* Sat Mar 14 2009 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Index: import.log
===
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/dejavu-fonts/devel/import.log,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -p -r1.15 -r1.16
--- import.log 15 Mar 2009 18:51:59 - 1.15
+++ import.log 23 May 2009 13:14:43 - 1.16
@@ -13,3 +13,4 @@ dejavu-fonts-2_28-4_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fon
dejavu-fonts-2_28-5_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.28-5.fc11.src.rpm:123533
dejavu-fonts-2_29-1_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.29-1.fc11.src.rpm:1237057458
dejavu-fonts-2_29-2_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.src.rpm:1237143073
+dejavu-fonts-2_29-3_fc11:HEAD:dejavu-fonts-2.29-3.fc11.src.rpm:1243084445
___
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list
Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 502307] Review Request:sil-charis-compact-fonts - A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502307 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-fonts-bugs-l...@redh ||at.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
[Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-05-23 10:17:06 EDT --- Have you tried to coordinate with the people working on bug #458430 ? They seem to have done quite a lot of work already (but stalled :() -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-fonts-bugs-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-bugs-list
Re: Problems with bugzilla and FAS account
On Wed, 20 May 2009 08:13:40 -0500 (CDT), Mike wrote: On Wed, 20 May 2009, Michael Schwendt wrote: As the fedoraproject aliases have trouble forwarding mail to GMX, I've changed my FAS account to use my Google Mail address. I've confirmed the change meanwhile. In bugzilla, however, my account still uses my GMX address. And I cannot change that. When I try to change it, I get: There is already an account with the login name mschwendt AT gmail.com. That looks as if the FAS sync script created a separate account for me. Right? Are there special requirements for FAS users? Do I need to change email addr in bugzilla _before_ changing it in FAS? Or what is necessary to get this right? I'd guess that you need to change it in bugzilla first, If the FAS backend managed to create a new account in bugzilla, why would I need to _change_ an existing one myself? Can't it sync bugzilla with my email change in FAS? (which is what I expected it to do) Anyone who changes email in FAS gets a new bugzilla account for the changed email address? Is that how it's implemented currently? and I'd bet you'll have to contact the bugzilla owner to get it changed in its current state. Well, I could ask bugzilla to send me a password, then reassign the superfluous account to a throw-away address. Let me talk to Toshio first though to confirm that. We might be able to fix it on our end, not sure. ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Problems with bugzilla and FAS account
On 2009-05-23 12:08:30 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: If the FAS backend managed to create a new account in bugzilla, why would I need to _change_ an existing one myself? Can't it sync bugzilla with my email change in FAS? (which is what I expected it to do) This is because at the time of writing, there was no XMLRPC method exposed for changing a user's email. I just checked now, and there might be a new method available that we can use. I'll look at adding this to our scripts soon. Anyone who changes email in FAS gets a new bugzilla account for the changed email address? Is that how it's implemented currently? This is currently implemented as follows: When a user changes their email in FAS, or changes their membership in the fedorabugs group, a trigger runs which adds the user to a special queue table. We then run a script periodically that empties out the queue and creates a BZ account if one doesn't already exist, and grants privileges to the accounts. The relevant code for this is in the FAS repo: git://git.fedorahosted.org/git/fas.git in scripts/export-bugzilla.* and fas2.sql. Thanks, Ricky pgpCeOQRuzR6Y.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Re: Problems with bugzilla and FAS account
On 05/23/2009 08:32 AM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
On 2009-05-23 12:08:30 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
If the FAS backend managed to create a new account in bugzilla, why would
I need to _change_ an existing one myself? Can't it sync bugzilla with my
email change in FAS? (which is what I expected it to do)
This is because at the time of writing, there was no XMLRPC method
exposed for changing a user's email. I just checked now, and there
might be a new method available that we can use. I'll look at
adding this to our scripts soon.
Anyone who changes email in FAS gets a new bugzilla account for the changed
email address? Is that how it's implemented currently?
This is currently implemented as follows: When a user changes their
email in FAS, or changes their membership in the fedorabugs group, a
trigger runs which adds the user to a special queue table. We then run
a script periodically that empties out the queue and creates a BZ
account if one doesn't already exist, and grants privileges to the
accounts. The relevant code for this is in the FAS repo:
git://git.fedorahosted.org/git/fas.git
in scripts/export-bugzilla.* and fas2.sql.
Apologies for not joining in sooner. What ricky's outlined as the
current situation is correct. Michael, what you outlined as a way to
keep the accounts straight would work. I think making the script not
create new accounts (forcing the user to reconcile the fas email and
lack of bugzilla account manually) is the way to go.
Here's an untested, updated export-bugzilla.py script. It emails the
users when an account mismatch occurs (I believe this runs in cron
hourly, so this would send an email once an hour). Does this look good
to you guys?
I'm going to a family reunion this weekend. If someone wants to update
the script sooner, they can (It will need an infrastructure change
request if we put this in place before the release but should be fairly
low risk/easy to revert.)
-Toshio
#!/usr/bin/python -t
__requires__ = 'TurboGears'
import pkg_resources
pkg_resources.require('CherryPy = 2.0, 3.0alpha')
import sys
import getopt
import xmlrpclib
import smtplib
from email.Message import Message
import turbogears
import bugzilla
from turbogears import config
turbogears.update_config(configfile=/etc/export-bugzilla.cfg)
from turbogears.database import session
from fas.model import BugzillaQueue
BZSERVER = config.get('bugzilla.url',
'https://bugdev.devel.redhat.com/bugzilla-cvs/xmlrpc.cgi')
BZUSER = config.get('bugzilla.username')
BZPASS = config.get('bugzilla.password')
MAILSERVER = config.get('mail.server', localhost)
ADMINEMAIL = config.get(mail.admin_email, 'ad...@fedoraproject.org')
if __name__ == '__main__':
opts, args = getopt.getopt(sys.argv[1:], '', ('usage', 'help'))
if len(args) != 2 or ('--usage','') in opts or ('--help','') in opts:
print
Usage: export-bugzilla.py GROUP BUGZILLA_GROUP
sys.exit(1)
ourGroup = args[0]
bzGroup = args[1]
server = bugzilla.Bugzilla(url=BZSERVER, user=BZUSER, password=BZPASS)
bugzilla_queue = BugzillaQueue.query.join('group').filter_by(
name=ourGroup)
no_bz_account = []
for entry in bugzilla_queue:
# Make sure we have a record for this user in bugzilla
if entry.action == 'r':
# Remove the user's bugzilla group
try:
server.updateperms(entry.email, 'rem', (bzGroup,))
except xmlrpclib.Fault, e:
if e.faultCode == 504:
# It's okay, not having this user is equivalent to setting
# them to not have this group.
pass
else:
raise
elif entry.action == 'a':
# Make sure the user exists
try:
server.getuser(entry.email)
except xmlrpclib.Fault, e:
if e.faultCode == 51:
# This user doesn't have a bugzilla account yet
# add them to a list and we'll let them know.
no_bz_account.append(entry)
continue
else:
print 'Error:', e, entry.email, entry.person.human_name
raise
server.updateperms(entry.email, 'add', (bzGroup,))
else:
print 'Unrecognized action code: %s %s %s %s %s' % (entry.action,
entry.email, entry.person.human_name,
entry.person.username, entry.group.name)
# Remove them from the queue
session.delete(entry)
session.flush()
# Mail the people without bugzilla accounts
msg = Message()
for person in no_bz_account:
smtplib.SMTP(MAILSERVER)
message = '''Hello, %(name)s,
As a Fedora packager, we grant you permissions to make changes to bugs in
bugzilla to all Fedora bugs. This lets you work together with other Fedora
developers in an easier fashion. However, to enable
FWD: Re: [ILUG] Fedora on Macbook
Need some tips. Came across this on Irish Linux User Group. I'm not a Mac user and don't know how to help this guy. http://www.linux.ie/lists/pipermail/ilug/2009-May/102618.html I gave him the link to this list. Frank Conor Mac Aoidh wrote: Hi, I just tried to install Fedora 10 on my macbook. I wiped everything during the installation and chose all the default installation options. When the installer was complete I rebooted and was greeted by a warning: Missing Operating System. I thought that there might have been a problem in my installation so I did it again and was greeted by the same error afterwards. I am using a MacBook 1.83 ghz, 2gb ram. Does anyone else have any experience installing Fedora on a macbook or can you tell me what could be wrong? Thanks --- Conor http://macaoidh.name ___ Fedora-laptop-list mailing list Fedora-laptop-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-laptop-list
Re: Re: [ILUG] Fedora on Macbook
I have three OS on my macbook pro(OSX, WinXP and FC10). Fedora works beautifully on macbook. I have used refit as the boot loader as shown in the link below. http://wiki.onmac.net/index.php/Triple_Boot_via_BootCamp But you want just linux on your machine, situation is different. EFI works differently from BIOS. Thanks, Rupak On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote: Need some tips. Came across this on Irish Linux User Group. I'm not a Mac user and don't know how to help this guy. http://www.linux.ie/lists/pipermail/ilug/2009-May/102618.html I gave him the link to this list. Frank Conor Mac Aoidh wrote: Hi, I just tried to install Fedora 10 on my macbook. I wiped everything during the installation and chose all the default installation options. When the installer was complete I rebooted and was greeted by a warning: Missing Operating System. I thought that there might have been a problem in my installation so I did it again and was greeted by the same error afterwards. I am using a MacBook 1.83 ghz, 2gb ram. Does anyone else have any experience installing Fedora on a macbook or can you tell me what could be wrong? Thanks --- Conor http://macaoidh.name ___ Fedora-laptop-list mailing list Fedora-laptop-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-laptop-list ___ Fedora-laptop-list mailing list Fedora-laptop-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-laptop-list
Re: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 22/05/2009 21:29, Mike Cloaked a écrit : Kevin Kofler wrote: Stop considering proprietary drivers acceptable, they are not. Kevin Kofler So imagine that there is a newbie Linux user starting to read this list and he/she just happens to own one single machine that just happens to have an Nvidia graphics card - are you suggesting that people on this list tell this new user to go away and buy a better machine with the appropriate hardware, simply because Fedora default install does not support his/her graphics card. C'mon now - be reasonable! He/she will likely go look for another Linux distro! First I want to thank anybody who answered... On this subject: proprietary/non-proprietary, I would like to say that maybe some people can choose to only use free software, but it is not the case for everybody. 1- My lab in my university has contracts with companies and I have to choose in a panel of offers. For computers, it is Dell and Dell's offer is with nvidia graphic. What can I do? 2- I am not a computer scientist, I use computers (like many people) and I do not want to waste a lot of time to find out how to configure new hardwares I have never seen before. I know how to configure nvidia graphic cards because we have many computers with nvidia. All cards, up to now, are from Geforce series and I did not know if Quadro series were supported by fedora OS. 3- Many times we have to deal with hardwares using proprietary drivers, nvidia is among them. But, it seems to me that nvidia gives a lot of documentation on their cards and provides drivers and help for linux which make them easy to use This is not the case for all hardware manufacturers: who had never experienced a modem or lan or wifi card not working on his laptop? 4- Why not believe that one day nvidia will make open sources drivers? Sun, is now going to furnish an open source jre. Why? Is it because a lot of people from linux community refused to use the free, but not open sources, Sun jre? I don't think so! - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 4286 2145 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkoXp5gACgkQdE6C2dhV2JWLDgCgwhXn2pkHYpxDisYpclzQ5dxB nFMAoLvd+ivZFxJ++DbJqwgxVUxNLPNk =TDNi -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
On Sat, 23 May 2009 09:36:56 +0200 François Patte wrote: 1- My lab in my university has contracts with companies and I have to choose in a panel of offers. For computers, it is Dell and Dell's offer is with nvidia graphic. What can I do? Are you a student, a research assistant, a scientist, or a professor?Your approach and your power may differ depending on your position in the pecking order at your university, but basically you can make the case that proprietary software is making your job more difficult than it needs to be. For example, if you use a supported Intel video chipset (and ATI, now) there is no need to do anything at all when you install Fedora or Centos on a computer. The video just works right off the bat, and there are no outside drivers to worry about at all. There's also less to deal with when upgrading a kernel after the initial installation is long over and done with. I'm sure you can make a persuasive case to the powers-that-be in your world, if you want to. Comments in this mailing list should provide you with an excellent start toward a presentation. 2- I am not a computer scientist, I use computers (like many people) and I do not want to waste a lot of time to find out how to configure new hardwares I have never seen before. I know how to configure nvidia graphic cards because we have many computers with nvidia. All cards, up to now, are from Geforce series and I did not know if Quadro series were supported by fedora OS. See above. There's less involved in setting up and maintaining a supported Intel or ATI video chipset than there is with any Nvidia chipset. 3- Many times we have to deal with hardwares using proprietary drivers, nvidia is among them. But there are excellent alternatives to Nvidia that provide even better and more painless support! Why ride the second-class bus? This is not the case for all hardware manufacturers: who had never experienced a modem or lan or wifi card not working on his laptop? Irrelevant in this instance -- we can discuss supported modems, lans and wifi cards in another thread if you have questions. 4- Why not believe that one day nvidia will make open sources drivers? Sure -- when they do that then their cards may or may not be worth looking at. Until then, though, why ride the second class bus? Once again, I'm sure you can make a persuasive case for using open-source video chipsets in your lab if you wish to do so. If you require assistance with getting the ducks in a row, so to speak, I'm sure that many folks on this mailing list will be pleased to help you. -- MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 09:36:56 +0200, François Patte francois.pa...@mi.parisdescartes.fr wrote: 1- My lab in my university has contracts with companies and I have to choose in a panel of offers. For computers, it is Dell and Dell's offer is with nvidia graphic. What can I do? My work buys computers through Dell and I was able to get an ATI video driver. However, I had to choose a Windows OS, since Dell didn't sell models with Redhat and ATI video cards in the category of machine (workstation) that I was choosing. 2- I am not a computer scientist, I use computers (like many people) and I do not want to waste a lot of time to find out how to configure new hardwares I have never seen before. I know how to configure nvidia graphic cards because we have many computers with nvidia. All cards, up to now, are from Geforce series and I did not know if Quadro series were supported by fedora OS. ATI is actually easier since you don't need to do anything special. However, I think right now there are issues with the level of support by the free drivers. So if you really want easy to use and 3D support, you want to wait for F12 (at least time frame wise, as the F11 drivers will be getting improvements over time). 4- Why not believe that one day nvidia will make open sources drivers? Sun, is now going to furnish an open source jre. Why? Is it because a lot of people from linux community refused to use the free, but not open sources, Sun jre? I don't think so! I think that had to do with someone writing a free replacement. At that point, not competing with their own free version could end up with them losing control. In the hardware market, the best way to get nVidia to provide specs is not too buy their hardware. If it's costing them money not to provide specs, they'll have incentive to change their behavior. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F 10 Installation without Network Manager
2009/5/23 Mike Dwiggins m...@azdwiggins.com: Has anyone found a way to install F 10 without installing Network Manager? The installation program should permit to exclude it customizing the package selection. However, if you are not planning to use NetworkManager to administer you network interfaces, you could either uninstall it or disable its use. To uninstall the network manager issue the 'yum remove NetworkManager' command. To disable, you can use 'chkconfig NetworkManager off' and 'service NetworkManager stop'. When planning to use the usual /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ scripts to configure the network, I usually opt for the second solution. Cheers, -- Giuseppe Fuggiano Linux user #483710 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F 10 Installation without Network Manager
On 05/23/2009 08:34 AM, Mike Dwiggins wrote: Has anyone found a way to install F 10 without installing Network Manager? Not possible since Anaconda itself uses Network Manager for managing the network during installation in Fedora 10. However, you can disable the service or remove it post-installation if necessary. Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Which html editor you would suggest in the latest Fedora?
-- Jerry Wong -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: What software is missing in the Fedora repository?
Rahul Sundaram wrote: Forgot this One: Amaya W3C web Editor http://osdir.com/ml/fedora-devel-list/2009-03/msg00016.html Maybe releavnt: http://osdir.com/ml/fedora-devel-list/2009-03/msg00016.html Frank -- msn: frankly3d skype: frankly3d Mailing-List Reply to: Mailing-List Still Learning, Unicode where possible -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Which html editor you would suggest in the latest Fedora?
On Sat, 23 May 2009 18:08:28 +0800 Jerry wong63...@hotmail.com wrote: (Tip: a little body text and context helps - what desktop environment you're running for a start, as it'll help suggest a good fit. Need I point the OP at http://catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html ? :-D) I'm switching between Bluefish and Geany - the latter primarily for the revision control integration. Don't discount the classics (vim/emacs) + tidy though. :-) Michael. -- Michael Fleming mflem...@thatfleminggent.com Website/Blog: http://www.thatfleminggent.com Fedora / Red Hat Packages http://www.thatfleminggent.com/rpm-packages -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
I've read through this thread as well, and I too would like to thank everyone for their views. I too work in a large organization where I have absolutely no choice in the hardware and software selections (for 98,000+ active computer workstations.) I don't have a voice in those selections either, and yes I've tried lobbying for some flexibility. It is can be fun to blindly insist on one thing without any flexibility in the matter. What I try to do is work as well as I can with what my employer provides. That is what was provided to me as an employee. I'm not going to waste too much time complaining about it because it is also true that every minute spent complaining is a minute I'm not getting my job done. And I have a family to think about. So folks, no zealotry for me. I'm quite happy with my paycheck. I need it. There will come a time when I decide I need proprietary drivers. I've used them before and I will again. I do recognize there are plenty of open source people out there working to offer alternative choices, and I support them too. I made a choice to use Fedora outside of my work place. But in making that choice I also decided to be practical and understand there are times when I may have to use non-free solutions. Bob On 05/23/2009 03:36 AM, François Patte wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 22/05/2009 21:29, Mike Cloaked a écrit : Kevin Kofler wrote: Stop considering proprietary drivers acceptable, they are not. Kevin Kofler So imagine that there is a newbie Linux user starting to read this list and he/she just happens to own one single machine that just happens to have an Nvidia graphics card - are you suggesting that people on this list tell this new user to go away and buy a better machine with the appropriate hardware, simply because Fedora default install does not support his/her graphics card. C'mon now - be reasonable! He/she will likely go look for another Linux distro! First I want to thank anybody who answered... On this subject: proprietary/non-proprietary, I would like to say that maybe some people can choose to only use free software, but it is not the case for everybody. 1- My lab in my university has contracts with companies and I have to choose in a panel of offers. For computers, it is Dell and Dell's offer is with nvidia graphic. What can I do? 2- I am not a computer scientist, I use computers (like many people) and I do not want to waste a lot of time to find out how to configure new hardwares I have never seen before. I know how to configure nvidia graphic cards because we have many computers with nvidia. All cards, up to now, are from Geforce series and I did not know if Quadro series were supported by fedora OS. 3- Many times we have to deal with hardwares using proprietary drivers, nvidia is among them. But, it seems to me that nvidia gives a lot of documentation on their cards and provides drivers and help for linux which make them easy to use This is not the case for all hardware manufacturers: who had never experienced a modem or lan or wifi card not working on his laptop? 4- Why not believe that one day nvidia will make open sources drivers? Sun, is now going to furnish an open source jre. Why? Is it because a lot of people from linux community refused to use the free, but not open sources, Sun jre? I don't think so! - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 4286 2145 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkoXp5gACgkQdE6C2dhV2JWLDgCgwhXn2pkHYpxDisYpclzQ5dxB nFMAoLvd+ivZFxJ++DbJqwgxVUxNLPNk =TDNi -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Frustration with F10/KDE
On Friday 22 May 2009 21:04:38 Robin Laing wrote: Todd Denniston wrote: Clemens Eisserer wrote, On 05/22/2009 07:50 AM: crash of what? details? Plasma of course. I already filed a bug with a complete stack-trace. Like I did with all the other crashes I've reported with a full stack-trace, which haven't been looked at. (Except for the first-level guys sorting dups out). - Clemens and it is bugzilla # what, so that we all know WHICH of the stack traces are relevant to this thread? Thanks. I would like to see the number(s) as well because I have full crashes/freezes with F10 and KDE but nothing to go on. No logs or messages of any type. Most of these problems are caused by graphics card drivers. KDE 4 stresses parts of the drivers previously unused. All the major three providers are working on the problems. As a workaround you sometimes have to turn off all desktop effects, In other cases editing xorg.conf helps. It's worth reading http://userbase.kde.org/GPU-Performance for some tips. For a greater understanding of what's happening in the driver world, read this article about Intel drivers: http://keithp.com/blogs/Sharpening_the_Intel_Driver_Focus/ Anne signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Which html editor you would suggest in the latest Fedora?
Thanks Michael, I am going to try the Geany. Many thanks Jerry Michael Fleming mflem...@thatfleminggent.com ???:20090523213438.79703...@defender... On Sat, 23 May 2009 18:08:28 +0800 Jerry wong63...@hotmail.com wrote: (Tip: a little body text and context helps - what desktop environment you're running for a start, as it'll help suggest a good fit. Need I point the OP at http://catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html ? :-D) I'm switching between Bluefish and Geany - the latter primarily for the revision control integration. Don't discount the classics (vim/emacs) + tidy though. :-) Michael. -- Michael Fleming mflem...@thatfleminggent.com Website/Blog: http://www.thatfleminggent.com Fedora / Red Hat Packages http://www.thatfleminggent.com/rpm-packages -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: If you wondered why Intel sucks on Fedora read this
On 05/16/2009 04:14 PM, Steven W. Orr wrote: Not that it matters, but the Alpha chip was one impressive processor. That thing could clock off as many as 6 instructions per clock tick because of intelligent pipelining. Note that many of the Intel compiler people are former Digital compiler people. -- Jerry Feldman g...@blu.org Boston Linux and Unix PGP key id: 537C5846 PGP Key fingerprint: 3D1B 8377 A3C0 A5F2 ECBB CA3B 4607 4319 537C 5846 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Re:Someone with a good command construct ??
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 21:02 -0700, Arne Chr. Jorgensen wrote: hi, Not been well lately, and I have not done much clever thinking. And so, - was the idea without any purpose at all ? Maybe if you explained what you're trying to do, someone may have an answer. I've read your original post about this several times and I still don't get it. Try to reduce the problem to its essentials and state it succinctly. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Troubles with gnome-format
I was using a geekstick (Sandisk Cruzer 4 GB) when the power went out suddenly. It doesn't boot any more. My thought was to format it, and re-install the bootable Crunchee (clone of crunchbang linux) that it had before. Inserted into this machine, it automounts, and Properties shows it as /media/disk. When I try to format it, either to FAT or to ext2, it pops up an error saying permission is denied -- for /dev/sdc I ran both chown -r btth:btth both against /media/disk and against /dev/sdc; it seemed to complete normally (or at least, without any message) both times. But gnome-format still fails, still with the same error. -- Beartooth Staffwright, PhD, Neo-Redneck Linux Convert Remember I know precious little of what I am talking about. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Troubles with gnome-format
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 14:37 +, Beartooth wrote: I was using a geekstick (Sandisk Cruzer 4 GB) when the power went out suddenly. It doesn't boot any more. My thought was to format it, and re-install the bootable Crunchee (clone of crunchbang linux) that it had before. Inserted into this machine, it automounts, and Properties shows it as /media/disk. When I try to format it, either to FAT or to ext2, it pops up an error saying permission is denied -- for /dev/sdc Use /dev/sdc1. poc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 23/05/2009 09:55, Frank Cox a écrit : On Sat, 23 May 2009 09:36:56 +0200 François Patte wrote: 1- My lab in my university has contracts with companies and I have to choose in a panel of offers. For computers, it is Dell and Dell's offer is with nvidia graphic. What can I do? Are you a student, a research assistant, a scientist, or a professor?Your approach and your power may differ depending on your position in the pecking order at your university, but basically you can make the case that proprietary software is making your job more difficult than it needs to be. My power is not so big facing a big research institution like CNRS in France. So For example, if you use a supported Intel video chipset (and ATI, now) there is no need to do anything at all when you install Fedora or Centos on a computer. The video just works right off the bat, and there are no outside drivers to worry about at all. There's also less to deal with when upgrading a kernel after the initial installation is long over and done with. This, I don't understand: I installed nvidia akmod from rpm-fussion-non-free and there absolutely no problem of the like: nvidia module is automatically compiled if the kernel updated. 3- Many times we have to deal with hardwares using proprietary drivers, nvidia is among them. But there are excellent alternatives to Nvidia that provide even better and more painless support! Why ride the second-class bus? I don't know what is second class bus (in fact, I know: my wages are not so high!) but I have some Dell computer with an ATI card and the only difference is that the driver is installed from the first install (and not after update and config of rpm-fusion repos) but running glxgears gives 2900FPS for ATI, 500FPS for nvidia with the nv driver and 15000FPS for nvidia with nvidia driver. Moreover, I need various config for multiscreen display (clone, xinerama...) and the nvidia doc is easy and clear enough for me to be used to get what I want. I write by hand the needed xorg.conf, graphic tools are not able to write exactly what I want (or I don't know how to use them!) - -- François Patte UFR de mathématiques et informatique Université Paris Descartes 45, rue des Saints Pères F-75270 Paris Cedex 06 Tél. +33 (0)1 4286 2145 http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkoYFdQACgkQdE6C2dhV2JWacQCcDuX79oEihlBQ9jaejCv5dH8s Z9oAn0Bw0PQBaSu1LG9mLVDidaDMIzov =ZCMl -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Troubles with gnome-format -- Aaarrgghhh
On Sat, 23 May 2009 10:26:41 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 14:37 +, Beartooth wrote: [] Inserted into this machine, it automounts, and Properties shows it as /media/disk. When I try to format it, either to FAT or to ext2, it pops up an error saying permission is denied -- for /dev/sdc Use /dev/sdc1. When I do that, I no longer get the error message; but noting visible happens; and when I look again at the stick, it still shows the same content as before. I tried (several times) using liveusb-creator, figuring that would wipe at least enough. It kept telling me (among a variety of other errors) that it found no live image -- on .isos that I know are, and that I have used as live CDs. Finally I tried F10-Beta-i686-Live.iso, just to get one with live right in the name. It seemed to take that, and got as far as 96%; next time I looked, liveusb-creator looked as if it had just been launched. No report of success or anything else. I unmounted, re-mounted, and started looking for something readable. /boot/grub/menu.lst says Eeedora! That's neither what got zapped nor what I was trying to install -- I suppose it must be left over from the rest of the stick after Cruncheee I unmounted and removed it, and willpresently try booting the EeePC from it. Stay tuned. -- Beartooth Staffwright, PhD, Neo-Redneck Linux Convert Remember I know precious little of what I am talking about. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
KDE Wallet - why does it ask?
KDEWallet has started asking me for my password when I enter KMail. What exactly determines whether or not KDE Wallet asks for this? Is it a function of the application or of the wallet? -- Timothy Murphy e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366 s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College Dublin -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Selinux, Fail2ban, iptables BUG
FC10/KDE
Has anyone run across this problem run across this while running
fail2ban-0.8.3-18.fc10.noarch ??
there are two Redhat bug reports on this same problem and they seem to
think it's fixed, but it isn't.
Bug #
499674
491444
Summary:
SELinux is preventing iptables (iptables_t) read write fail2ban_t.
Detailed Description:
SELinux denied access requested by iptables. It is not expected that this access
is required by iptables and this access may signal an intrusion attempt. It is
also possible that the specific version or configuration of the application is
causing it to require additional access.
Allowing Access:
You can generate a local policy module to allow this access - see FAQ
(http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc5/#id2961385) Or you can disable
SELinux protection altogether. Disabling SELinux protection is not recommended.
Please file a bug report (http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi)
against this package.
Additional Information:
Source Contextsystem_u:system_r:iptables_t:s0
Target Contextsystem_u:system_r:fail2ban_t:s0
Target Objectssocket [ unix_stream_socket ]
Sourceiptables
Source Path /sbin/iptables
Port Unknown
Host biggie
Source RPM Packages iptables-1.4.1.1-2.fc10
Target RPM Packages
Policy RPMselinux-policy-3.5.13-58.fc10
Selinux Enabled True
Policy Type targeted
MLS Enabled True
Enforcing ModeEnforcing
Plugin Name catchall
Host Name biggie
Platform Linux biggie 2.6.29.1-42.fc10.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed
Apr 22 11:47:13 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64
Alert Count 39
First SeenSat 02 May 2009 09:43:41 PM EDT
Last Seen Thu 07 May 2009 01:09:31 AM EDT
Local ID 765a64aa-c7e2-441f-ac75-afdfb7b642b6
Line Numbers
Raw Audit Messages
node=biggie type=AVC msg=audit(1241672971.407:666): avc: denied { read write
} for pid=20191 comm=iptables path=socket:[10476] dev=sockfs ino=10476
scontext=system_u:system_r:iptables_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:system_r:fail2ban_t:s0 tclass=unix_stream_socket
node=biggie type=AVC msg=audit(1241672971.407:666): avc: denied { read write
} for pid=20191 comm=iptables path=socket:[10496] dev=sockfs ino=10496
scontext=system_u:system_r:iptables_t:s0
tcontext=system_u:system_r:fail2ban_t:s0 tclass=unix_stream_socket
node=biggie type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1241672971.407:666): arch=c03e
syscall=59 success=yes exit=0 a0=9decb0 a1=9df2f0 a2=9ddb80 a3=3d92f6da70
items=0 ppid=1864 pid=20191 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0
egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm=iptables
exe=/sbin/iptables subj=system_u:system_r:iptables_t:s0 key=(null)
--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
F9: Kernel kernel-2.6.27.23-78.2.50.fc9.i686 installed May 19th 2009, a problem?
From: /var/log/yum.log: === May 19 14:13:01 Installed: kernel-2.6.27.23-78.2.50.fc9.i686 May 19 14:18:25 Installed: kernel-2.6.27.23-78.2.50.fc9.i686 I noticed strange behaviour with the kernels above, first that it appears to be installed twice from some reason, but that may not be the issue. The issue I am seeing is that my Core-2 Duo system is a fast system before this kernel was installed and was performing fabulously, until now. It seems to spend an inordinate amount of time loading files from the disk (disk access is high) for a much longer length of time and greatly slows the performance of the system. What is also odd, I note is that gkrellm is showing very little, almost no disk activity when it is obvious that my system HD LEDs are showing a solid red activity when the disk accessed. I also noticed that when I am away from my computer and the screen locks, unlocking it takes an extraordinary amount of time to respond (the screen remains blacked out for quite some time) before displaying my desktop, and also note that my 2GB RAM, 5GB swap is hitting very hard and this has never-ever happened before this kernel was installed and in fact I had zero swap activity all this time since I had this new Mobo installed. The previous kernel when the screen was unlocked, snapped on much quicker. Has anyone else seen anything different with this new kernel? Kind regards, Dan -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: What software is missing in the Fedora repository?
Rahul Sundaram wrote: Joomla - a web content management system http://www.joomla.org/ I haven't used it, just ran across it, but was surprised it was not in the repositories when I went to install it so I could play around with it. It says it is open source, maybe there is some other reason it isn't packaged. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Selinux, Fail2ban, iptables BUG
la, 2009-05-23 kello 12:14 -0400, Jim kirjoitti: FC10/KDE Has anyone run across this problem run across this while running fail2ban-0.8.3-18.fc10.noarch ?? there are two Redhat bug reports on this same problem and they seem to think it's fixed, but it isn't. Bug # 499674 491444 Please look at bug # 475237. Though it originally didn't mention your particular problem, the latter was one of many fail2ban-related SELinux denials I encountered. In my case, the problem was solved by building a *local module* enabling the coexistence of fail2ban and SELinux. The procedure is explained in SELinux FAQ, but you may have to repeat the procedure several times. My local.te file is available (off-list) if you need it. Antti -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Selinux, Fail2ban, iptables BUG
Jim wrote: FC10/KDE Has anyone run across this problem run across this while running fail2ban-0.8.3-18.fc10.noarch ?? there are two Redhat bug reports on this same problem and they seem to think it's fixed, but it isn't. Bug # 499674 491444 Hi Jim, Glad you done a bugzilla. But joining the selinux-list wouldn't do any harm: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list Frank -- msn: frankly3d skype: frankly3d Mailing-List Reply to: Mailing-List Still Learning, Unicode where possible -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
Bruno Wolff III wrote: ATI is actually easier since you don't need to do anything special. However, I think right now there are issues with the level of support by the free drivers. The HD ones have no 3D support, the older (but still manufactured and sold) ones do. Of course most new prearranged systems these days will have the HDs. :-( 3D support for the HD series may or may not be ready in a F12 timeframe. The specs have finally been released, we had been waiting for them for a long time. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: KDE Wallet - why does it ask?
Timothy Murphy wrote: KDEWallet has started asking me for my password when I enter KMail. What exactly determines whether or not KDE Wallet asks for this? Is it a function of the application or of the wallet? Presumably you have some passwords for mail accounts stored in KWallet. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Broken video DVDs (no executable bits on *_TS folders)
Hi, some home made DVDs by some software is creating *_TS folders with 0400 permissions. This means that only root can really change into these folders. Is there a way to tell Fedora to always paste executional bits onto video DVDs? I'm trying to convert some people to use Fedora for their home systems and when they find out that Fedora will ignore their home made DVDs they don't really care that their Wincrap software generated a bad DVD (after all it runs on the DVD player). So while Fedora is actually doing The Right Thing, it is hindering its own acceptance. :( -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net pgpTITcPKcYVM.pgp Description: PGP signature -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Can't boot after an update
Evening All - at least here in Austria it's evening! On my other machine, I have Fedora10 (preupgraded from a clean F9), initially working with Gnome, but since January happily running KDE. For months now, no problems. Until yesterday evening! Applied the recommended updates with Yumex now cannot login. When I try to login normally, I give in my Username password, the login screen goes away, the little circle woergles away and pouf! back to the login screen. Tried selecting Gnome instead of KDE at the login, nothing appears to happen. At the login window, I cannot specify keyboard nor language. Got myself to a CLI, logged on as root, edited inittab to start in level 3. Login under my normal username is accepted, try startx, screen flashes some text (something about authority, I think from the bit I can see), screen goes black then comes back to the CLI with several repeats of a message about keyboard not compiling, error not fatal, waiting for X to terminate. Logon as root is accepted, gives a grey screen then a Gnome window comes up seems to work OK. Tried the Live CD. The original non-KDE one works OK, the KDE CD comes up to a login window wanting a password for liveuser (which it never did before - this system was installed from the F10-live-kde disc without any problem); I've tried all the passwords I can think of it just keeps coming back to the login screen. Anyone got any thoughts as to what might have happened how I might get past this %(%$$ login?? Many thanks (again) for any help Dave -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Can't boot after an update
DB wrote: Got myself to a CLI, logged on as root, edited inittab to start in level 3. Login under my normal username is accepted, try startx, screen flashes some text (something about authority, I think from the bit I can see), screen goes black then comes back to the CLI with several repeats of a message about keyboard not compiling, error not fatal, waiting for X to terminate. Logon as root is accepted, gives a grey screen then a Gnome window comes up seems to work OK. What video driver? Did it get upgraded recently? Tried the Live CD. The original non-KDE one works OK, the KDE CD comes up to a login window wanting a password for liveuser (which it never did before - this system was installed from the F10-live-kde disc without any problem); I've tried all the passwords I can think of it just keeps coming back to the login screen. The default password on the live CDs is blank, i.e. don't enter a password, just press ENTER. No idea why the autologon isn't working though. Kevin Kofler -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Selinux, Fail2ban, iptables BUG
2009/5/23 Jim mickey...@sbcglobal.net: FC10/KDE Has anyone run across this problem run across this while running fail2ban-0.8.3-18.fc10.noarch ?? there are two Redhat bug reports on this same problem and they seem to think it's fixed, but it isn't. Bug # 499674 491444 This is a design problem with fail2ban and the way is (ab)uses gamin. See: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=1971871group_id=121032atid=689044 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Which html editor you would suggest in the latest Fedora?
Jerry wrote: The 'composer' in the seamonkey suite works for me. Of course so do the browser and the news/mail reader, and the chat feature. And in the 2.0beta the rss reader works as well or better than TBird, and better than any aggregator I've tried. Not that I have tried them all, but what I tried split between klunky presentation and unreliable operation. SM2.0beta seems the real deal. -- Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. - from Slashdot -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: snd-hda-intel options in modprobe
Ambrogio wrote: Hi all, I'm working on my laptop to better use mic, headphone and speaker (internal and external). The laptop is a Vaio VGN-FW11E and the sound card is 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 03) Subsystem: Sony Corporation Unknown device 9035 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 22 Memory at d520 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [60] Message Signalled Interrupts: Mask- 64bit+ Queue=0/0 Enable- Capabilities: [70] Express Root Complex Integrated Endpoint, MSI 00 Capabilities: [100] Virtual Channel ? Capabilities: [130] Root Complex Link ? Kernel driver in use: HDA Intel Kernel modules: snd-hda-intel 01:00.1 Audio device: ATI Technologies Inc RV620 Audio device [Radeon HD 34xx Series] Subsystem: Sony Corporation Unknown device 9035 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 17 Memory at d003 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 3 Capabilities: [58] Express Legacy Endpoint, MSI 00 Capabilities: [a0] Message Signalled Interrupts: Mask- 64bit+ Queue=0/0 Enable- Capabilities: [100] Vendor Specific Information ? Kernel driver in use: HDA Intel Kernel modules: snd-hda-intel With a standard Fedora 9 installation (updated) I can use the speaker and an external mic. I can use also the camera but not the internal mic (that I think is present near the camera). Alsamixer and kmix do not show options for mic other that Front mic. When I insert headphone, the speaker continue to sound (and also the headphone). I tried to use other models for hda-intel driver using the options files in /etc/modprobe.d whith options snd-hda-intel model=hippo headphone inserting mute the speaker, but mic do not work kmix shows mic - front mic - line - CD as input source but noone works without an external mic with options snd-hda-intel model=sony-assamd is the same but with less options as input and output. Someone can help my to found the right model? Alsa modules installed are alsa-lib-1.0.17-2.fc9.i386.rpm alsa-utils-1.0.17-2.fc9.i386.rpm Have you removed PulseAudio? No, not disabled... Warning, some other things may stop working, but if what you need works it may be a lesser evil. FC10 could be made to work with PA if you wasted^H^H^H^H^H^Hspent enough time onthe config, and FC11 has taken away the sliders. I have been unable to get sound working at all on FC11, I just have put that on my personal blocker list for installing FC11 on a machine which needs sound. -- Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. - from Slashdot -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Linksys WVC210 Webcam in FC10
Fedora 10 I have a Linksys WVC210 Webcam using the ZoneMinder App. using HTTP, it will work fine in the Firefox with a IP address. Can I get it to work in VLC ? I have tried all the settings I know in VLC but can't get it to display. I setup the network connection in VLC, http, 172.16.1.36 but I can't get it to work. As far as ZoneMinder, it is setup and running. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Broken video DVDs (no executable bits on *_TS folders)
Axel Thimm wrote: Hi, some home made DVDs by some software is creating *_TS folders with 0400 permissions. This means that only root can really change into these folders. Is there a way to tell Fedora to always paste executional bits onto video DVDs? I'm trying to convert some people to use Fedora for their home systems and when they find out that Fedora will ignore their home made DVDs they don't really care that their Wincrap software generated a bad DVD (after all it runs on the DVD player). So while Fedora is actually doing The Right Thing, it is hindering its own acceptance. :( I can't imagine any change which would make that work and still be remotely functional behavior. Turning off permissions checking on directories isn't going to happen. You *might* be able to write a user-mode filesystem which ran as root and made the media available with other permissions, or the xorisso package might let you keep the metadata in memory with changed permissions. Finally, you could make a copy of just the directory structure on a ramdisk, update the directory permissions, then write a symlink to each file in the ramdiskf/s and access stuff that way. I think that would work, but it's *UGLY*! The DVDs are broken, tell your friends their software is crap. And that the media will not play in certain Blu-Ray players which check properly. That might make a better connection. -- Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. - from Slashdot -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: snd-hda-intel options in modprobe
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Bill Davidsen david...@tmr.com wrote: Ambrogio wrote: Hi all, I'm working on my laptop to better use mic, headphone and speaker (internal and external). The laptop is a Vaio VGN-FW11E and the sound card is 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation 82801I (ICH9 Family) HD Audio Controller (rev 03) Subsystem: Sony Corporation Unknown device 9035 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 22 Memory at d520 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [60] Message Signalled Interrupts: Mask- 64bit+ Queue=0/0 Enable- Capabilities: [70] Express Root Complex Integrated Endpoint, MSI 00 Capabilities: [100] Virtual Channel ? Capabilities: [130] Root Complex Link ? Kernel driver in use: HDA Intel Kernel modules: snd-hda-intel 01:00.1 Audio device: ATI Technologies Inc RV620 Audio device [Radeon HD 34xx Series] Subsystem: Sony Corporation Unknown device 9035 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 17 Memory at d003 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 3 Capabilities: [58] Express Legacy Endpoint, MSI 00 Capabilities: [a0] Message Signalled Interrupts: Mask- 64bit+ Queue=0/0 Enable- Capabilities: [100] Vendor Specific Information ? Kernel driver in use: HDA Intel Kernel modules: snd-hda-intel With a standard Fedora 9 installation (updated) I can use the speaker and an external mic. I can use also the camera but not the internal mic (that I think is present near the camera). Alsamixer and kmix do not show options for mic other that Front mic. When I insert headphone, the speaker continue to sound (and also the headphone). I tried to use other models for hda-intel driver using the options files in /etc/modprobe.d whith options snd-hda-intel model=hippo headphone inserting mute the speaker, but mic do not work kmix shows mic - front mic - line - CD as input source but noone works without an external mic with options snd-hda-intel model=sony-assamd is the same but with less options as input and output. Someone can help my to found the right model? Alsa modules installed are alsa-lib-1.0.17-2.fc9.i386.rpm alsa-utils-1.0.17-2.fc9.i386.rpm Have you removed PulseAudio? No, not disabled... Warning, some other things may stop working, but if what you need works it may be a lesser evil. FC10 could be made to work with PA if you wasted^H^H^H^H^H^Hspent enough time onthe config, and FC11 has taken away the sliders. I have been unable to get sound working at all on FC11, I just have put that on my personal blocker list for installing FC11 on a machine which needs sound. This has nothing to do with pulseaudio. The internal mic is generally a digital mic. Using alsamixer -c 0 should show an option to select the digital or the analog (external) mic. However, this depends on the alsa driver being used. The current stable version is 1.0.20, but Fedora is always behind. I can select the digital mic on my Dell Vostro laptop, but the sound is too low to be useful, and I prefer to use the external anlog mic, than spenting days on the alsa development list because of that. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re-enable graphical boot in Fedora 11, switch between Plymouth themes
Hey there. Installed F11 preview, really like it. Intel 965GM graphics card, by the way. When I first set it up, I was delighted to find that plymouth and the new graphical boot splash, Compiz, and redirected direct rendering all work perfectly. I was very glad that at least for my card model, graphics are doing okay. However, I installed some system updates -- and a new kernel. For the heck of it, I also installed one or two other Plymouth themes, like the Solar theme. When I did, I no longer get the graphical boot on startup. Kernel modesetting still works, because even though I get the text-mode boot, it's a very sharp, high-res text mode boot. How can I get the graphical splashes back? When I ran grub with my old kernel, it used the graphical splash just fine. But when I compare the lines of the original kernel and the update kernel in grub.conf, they look exactly the same to me (with the rhgb and quiet options), so I'm not sure why I'm not getting the splash on my new kernel. And, by the by...how exactly do you switch between Plymouth themes when you have more than one installed? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Re-enable graphical boot in Fedora 11, switch between Plymouth themes
On 05/24/2009 06:36 AM, Jud Craft wrote: How can I get the graphical splashes back? When I ran grub with my old kernel, it used the graphical splash just fine. But when I compare the lines of the original kernel and the update kernel in grub.conf, they look exactly the same to me (with the rhgb and quiet options), so I'm not sure why I'm not getting the splash on my new kernel. And, by the by...how exactly do you switch between Plymouth themes when you have more than one installed? Refer https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2009-May/msg00993.html Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Re-enable graphical boot in Fedora 11, switch between Plymouth themes
That's awesome, thanks. So run those commands and that should do it. By doing a find / * | grep plymouth I found the plymouth README in /usr/share/doc/plymouth, and it also turned up a list of my themes in /usr/share/plymouth/themes. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Broken video DVDs (no executable bits on *_TS folders)
Axel Thimm wrote: Hi, some home made DVDs by some software is creating *_TS folders with 0400 permissions. This means that only root can really change into these folders. Is there a way to tell Fedora to always paste executional bits onto video DVDs? I'm trying to convert some people to use Fedora for their home systems and when they find out that Fedora will ignore their home made DVDs they don't really care that their Wincrap software generated a bad DVD (after all it runs on the DVD player). So while Fedora is actually doing The Right Thing, it is hindering its own acceptance. :( How are you mounting your DVDs? Is it auto-mounted by HAL? I sometimes use Windowmaker as my desktop and it doesn't automount any external storage device. Then I have to mount it by hand. I use the following to do that successfully. $ sudo mount -o uid=regular-user -o gid=group-of-user [other options] I think similar other options for -o allow you to mount with the executable bit set. The DVDs might work if you mounted it like this. Just a wild thought. :-/ -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
totem and android videos
The new Google G1 (linux-based) phone just added camcorder capability. Unfortunately the audio codec is something weird and totem complains about a missing codec. $ totem video-2009-05-23-15-33-41.3gp ** Message: don't know how to handle audio/AMR, codec_data=(buffer)001164616d7270766d6d020001, rate=(int)8000, channels=(int)1 ** Message: Missing plugin: gstreamer|0.10|totem|Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR) decoder|decoder-audio/AMR (Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR) decoder) ** Message: PackageKit: xid = 69206019 ** Message: PackageKit: Codec nice name: Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR) decoder ** Message: PackageKit: structure: gstreamer0.10(decoder-audio/AMR)()(64bit) ** Message: PackageKit: Did not install codec: The name org.freedesktop.PackageKit was not provided by any .service files ** Message: No installation candidate for missing plugins found. ** Message: don't know how to handle audio/AMR, codec_data=(buffer)001164616d7270766d6d020001, rate=(int)8000, channels=(int)1 ** Message: Missing plugin: gstreamer|0.10|totem|Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR) decoder|decoder-audio/AMR (ignoring) ** Message: All missing plugins are blacklisted, doing nothing Is there an RPM that I'm missing that provides this codec? I thought I had all the gstreamer ugly/bad/downright-evil etc codecs that were available. -wolfgang -- Wolfgang S. Rupprecht http://www.full-steam.org/ (ipv6-only) You may need to config 6to4 to see the above pages. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: totem and android videos
2009/5/23 Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wolfgang.rupprecht+gnus200...@gmail.com: The new Google G1 (linux-based) phone just added camcorder capability. Unfortunately the audio codec is something weird and totem complains about a missing codec. $ totem video-2009-05-23-15-33-41.3gp ** Message: don't know how to handle audio/AMR, codec_data=(buffer)001164616d7270766d6d020001, rate=(int)8000, channels=(int)1 ** Message: Missing plugin: gstreamer|0.10|totem|Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR) decoder|decoder-audio/AMR (Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR) decoder) ** Message: PackageKit: xid = 69206019 ** Message: PackageKit: Codec nice name: Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR) decoder ** Message: PackageKit: structure: gstreamer0.10(decoder-audio/AMR)()(64bit) ** Message: PackageKit: Did not install codec: The name org.freedesktop.PackageKit was not provided by any .service files ** Message: No installation candidate for missing plugins found. ** Message: don't know how to handle audio/AMR, codec_data=(buffer)001164616d7270766d6d020001, rate=(int)8000, channels=(int)1 ** Message: Missing plugin: gstreamer|0.10|totem|Adaptive Multi Rate (AMR) decoder|decoder-audio/AMR (ignoring) ** Message: All missing plugins are blacklisted, doing nothing Is there an RPM that I'm missing that provides this codec? I thought I had all the gstreamer ugly/bad/downright-evil etc codecs that were available. This is an Apple format. On windows quicktime or realplayer is capable of playing this. I use mplayer for this kind of formats. I don't know which particular codec mplayer uses, but the tarball of codecs from the project homepage works for me. -- Suvayu Open source is the future. It sets us free. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: totem and android videos
Me: $ totem video-2009-05-23-15-33-41.3gp ** Message: don't know how to handle audio/AMR, codec_data=(buffer)001164616d7270766d6d020001, rate=(int)8000, channels=(int)1 Looks like another patent encumbered, redistribution-encumbered uselessware. I am surprised that the Google Android phone would output a format that open-source can't use. Sigh. http://www.penguin.cz/~utx/amr -wolfgang -- Wolfgang S. Rupprecht Android 1.5 (Cupcake) and Fedora-11 -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: TV-out with nvidia drivers in Fedora 10
On Monday 18 May 2009 06:31:31 am James Allsopp wrote: Does this clone the output, or will I have a different display on each. Ideally, I'd like iplayer running on the TV and carry on working on the other display, Jim my output is cloned since that is what i need for mythtv. you don't have to do it that way though. your first post sounded to me like you wanted a larger desktop. -- Anthony - http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery 8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M
On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 08:18 -0400, Robert L Cochran wrote: I do recognize there are plenty of open source people out there working to offer alternative choices, and I support them too. I made a choice to use Fedora outside of my work place. But in making that choice I also decided to be practical and understand there are times when I may have to use non-free solutions. One wonders if these same zealots stick to their guns about not buying closed stuff when they buy their motherboards... There's more than just NVidia that's a magic black box in the computer. Yes, I'd like to be totally free, but I've got Buckley's chance. I'm not going to trash a $1200 laptop just to change chipsets. I still need to be able to do naughty things like play MP3s, even though I'd prefer ogg vorbis files (oggs sound better, too), but sometimes an MP3 is all you're going to get. And the list goes on... -- [...@localhost ~]$ uname -r 2.6.27.21-78.2.41.fc9.i686 Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I read messages from the public lists. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Fedora 11: Firewall - Using the Wizard
http://easylinuxcds.com/blog/?p=3428 Firewalls need to be simple and firewalls need to be complex….yes, this is a dilemma of huge consequence. However, Fedora has accomplished both in one firewall. Frank -- msn: frankly3d skype: frankly3d Mailing-List Reply to: Mailing-List Still Learning, Unicode where possible -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
Re: Myths
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 06:04:19AM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraMyths
This one hasn't been updated in a long time. If someone interested could
go through this and review the content, update it as necessary, it would
serve as a more useful page.
I'm working on that one right now. Also, this page could stand some
love too:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageKit_Frequently_Asked_Questions
If you or anyone else find pages that are in need of revision, please
mark them at the top with {{Needs love}}. This includes the template
that puts them in a list of pages needing maintenance:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Pages_that_need_love
--
Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
Re: [Fedora-music-list] about the Fedora Studio idea
Hello folks, I updated the wiki page. Based on the feedback I got (especially David's opinions were quite inspiring) and stealing some ideas from planetccrma-menu package, I came up with this outline: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FedoraStudio Note that this is by no means the final draft. Fell free to comment about it or even edit it yourself. Once (and if) we arrive at a general agreement here, I will bring the proposal into FESCo's attention. One thing you will notice in my categorization is: I didn't put any player in a subcategory. I thought that the players are the most commonly used application type and putting them directly in the Multimedia (SoundVideo in Gnome) group will make them easier to find. Let me know if you don't agree with me on this or on anything else. Cheers, Orcan ___ Fedora-music-list mailing list Fedora-music-list@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-music-list
rpms/ocaml-perl4caml/devel ocaml-perl4caml.spec,1.9,1.10
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-perl4caml/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13631
Modified Files:
ocaml-perl4caml.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-perl4caml.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-perl4caml/devel/ocaml-perl4caml.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -p -r1.9 -r1.10
--- ocaml-perl4caml.spec16 Apr 2009 09:06:14 - 1.9
+++ ocaml-perl4caml.spec23 May 2009 07:23:21 - 1.10
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-perl4caml
Version:0.9.5
-Release:8%{?dist}
+Release:9%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml library for calling Perl libraries and code
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -124,6 +124,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 0.9.5-9
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-camlidl/devel ocaml-camlidl.spec,1.7,1.8
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-camlidl/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15249
Modified Files:
ocaml-camlidl.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-camlidl.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-camlidl/devel/ocaml-camlidl.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -p -r1.7 -r1.8
--- ocaml-camlidl.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:02 - 1.7
+++ ocaml-camlidl.spec 23 May 2009 07:31:35 - 1.8
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-camlidl
Version:1.05
-Release:8%{?dist}
+Release:9%{?dist}
Summary:Stub code generator and COM binding for Objective Caml
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -100,6 +100,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 1.05-9
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-lablgtk/devel ocaml-lablgtk.spec,1.16,1.17
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-lablgtk/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15221
Modified Files:
ocaml-lablgtk.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-lablgtk.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-lablgtk/devel/ocaml-lablgtk.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -p -r1.16 -r1.17
--- ocaml-lablgtk.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:09 - 1.16
+++ ocaml-lablgtk.spec 23 May 2009 07:31:30 - 1.17
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Name: ocaml-lablgtk
Version:2.12.0
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
Summary:Objective Caml interface to gtk+
@@ -156,6 +156,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 2.12.0-3
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocamldsort/devel ocamldsort.spec,1.5,1.6
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocamldsort/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv16515
Modified Files:
ocamldsort.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocamldsort.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocamldsort/devel/ocamldsort.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6
--- ocamldsort.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:05 - 1.5
+++ ocamldsort.spec 23 May 2009 07:38:40 - 1.6
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocamldsort
Version:0.14.4
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Release:6%{?dist}
Summary:Dependency sorter for OCaml source files
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -73,6 +73,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 0.14.4-6
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-zip/devel ocaml-zip.spec,1.9,1.10
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-zip/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17047
Modified Files:
ocaml-zip.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-zip.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-zip/devel/ocaml-zip.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -p -r1.9 -r1.10
--- ocaml-zip.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:18 - 1.9
+++ ocaml-zip.spec 23 May 2009 07:41:34 - 1.10
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-zip
Version:1.04
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml library for reading and writing zip, jar and gzip files
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -103,6 +103,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 1.04-2
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-xml-light/devel ocaml-xml-light.spec,1.11,1.12
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-xml-light/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18331
Modified Files:
ocaml-xml-light.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-xml-light.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-xml-light/devel/ocaml-xml-light.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.11
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -p -r1.11 -r1.12
--- ocaml-xml-light.spec16 Apr 2009 09:06:17 - 1.11
+++ ocaml-xml-light.spec23 May 2009 07:45:16 - 1.12
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-xml-light
Version:2.2.cvs20070817
-Release:11%{?dist}
+Release:12%{?dist}
Summary:Minimal XML parser and printer for OCaml
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -89,6 +89,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 2.2.cvs20070817-12
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-ulex/devel ocaml-ulex.spec,1.15,1.16
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-ulex/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18453
Modified Files:
ocaml-ulex.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-ulex.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-ulex/devel/ocaml-ulex.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -p -r1.15 -r1.16
--- ocaml-ulex.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:17 - 1.15
+++ ocaml-ulex.spec 23 May 2009 07:45:52 - 1.16
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-ulex
Version:1.1
-Release:6%{?dist}
+Release:7%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml lexer generator for Unicode
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -88,6 +88,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 1.1-7
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-type-conv/devel ocaml-type-conv.spec,1.12,1.13
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-type-conv/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18825
Modified Files:
ocaml-type-conv.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-type-conv.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-type-conv/devel/ocaml-type-conv.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -p -r1.12 -r1.13
--- ocaml-type-conv.spec16 Apr 2009 09:06:17 - 1.12
+++ ocaml-type-conv.spec23 May 2009 07:47:18 - 1.13
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-type-conv
Version:1.6.7
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml base library for type conversion
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -59,6 +59,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 1.6.7-2
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-ssl/devel ocaml-ssl.spec,1.14,1.15
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-ssl/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv19454
Modified Files:
ocaml-ssl.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-ssl.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-ssl/devel/ocaml-ssl.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -p -r1.14 -r1.15
--- ocaml-ssl.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:17 - 1.14
+++ ocaml-ssl.spec 23 May 2009 07:49:59 - 1.15
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-ssl
Version:0.4.3
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
Summary:SSL bindings for OCaml
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -88,6 +88,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 0.4.3-3
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-sqlite/devel ocaml-sqlite.spec,1.12,1.13
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-sqlite/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22410
Modified Files:
ocaml-sqlite.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-sqlite.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-sqlite/devel/ocaml-sqlite.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -p -r1.12 -r1.13
--- ocaml-sqlite.spec 23 May 2009 07:56:37 - 1.12
+++ ocaml-sqlite.spec 23 May 2009 08:05:16 - 1.13
@@ -55,7 +55,10 @@ make all
%check
pushd test
-for f in test_db test_exec test_stmt test_fun; do
+# test_stmt test was broken in 1.5.0:
+#tests=test_agg test_db test_exec test_stmt test_fun
+tests=test_agg test_db test_exec test_fun
+for f in $tests; do
ocamlopt -I .. str.cmxa sqlite3.cmxa $f.ml -o $f
./$f
done
@@ -93,7 +96,7 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%files devel
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
-%doc COPYING CHANGES doc README TODO VERSION
+%doc COPYING Changelog doc README.txt TODO
%if %opt
%{_libdir}/ocaml/sqlite3/*.a
%{_libdir}/ocaml/sqlite3/*.cmxa
@@ -106,6 +109,8 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 1.5.0-1
- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
- New upstream version 1.5.0.
+- Fix tests.
+- Fix documentation.
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-res/devel ocaml-res.spec,1.7,1.8
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-res/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv22689
Modified Files:
ocaml-res.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-res.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-res/devel/ocaml-res.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -p -r1.7 -r1.8
--- ocaml-res.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:15 - 1.7
+++ ocaml-res.spec 23 May 2009 08:05:54 - 1.8
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-res
Version:3.1.1
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml library for resizing arrays and strings
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -92,6 +92,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 3.1.1-2
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-res/devel ocaml-res.spec,1.8,1.9
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-res/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23436
Modified Files:
ocaml-res.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-res.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-res/devel/ocaml-res.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -p -r1.8 -r1.9
--- ocaml-res.spec 23 May 2009 08:05:54 - 1.8
+++ ocaml-res.spec 23 May 2009 08:09:18 - 1.9
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-res
Version:3.1.1
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml library for resizing arrays and strings
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
-* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 3.1.1-2
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 3.1.1-3
- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-pcre/devel .cvsignore, 1.6, 1.7 ocaml-pcre.spec, 1.14, 1.15 sources, 1.6, 1.7
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-pcre/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23794
Modified Files:
.cvsignore ocaml-pcre.spec sources
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-pcre/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.6 -r1.7
--- .cvsignore 31 Aug 2008 10:05:50 - 1.6
+++ .cvsignore 23 May 2009 08:11:09 - 1.7
@@ -1 +1 @@
-pcre-ocaml-5.15.0.tar.bz2
+release-6.0.0.tar.bz2
Index: ocaml-pcre.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-pcre/devel/ocaml-pcre.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -p -r1.14 -r1.15
--- ocaml-pcre.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:13 - 1.14
+++ ocaml-pcre.spec 23 May 2009 08:11:09 - 1.15
@@ -2,14 +2,14 @@
%define debug_package %{nil}
Name: ocaml-pcre
-Version:5.15.0
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Version:6.0.0
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Perl compatibility regular expressions (PCRE) for OCaml
Group: Development/Libraries
License:LGPLv2
URL:http://www.ocaml.info/home/ocaml_sources.html#pcre-ocaml
-Source0:
http://www.ocaml.info/ocaml_sources/pcre-ocaml-%{version}.tar.bz2
+Source0:
http://hg.ocaml.info/release/pcre-ocaml/archive/release-%{version}.tar.bz2
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
ExcludeArch:sparc64 s390 s390x
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ developing applications that use %{name}
%prep
-%setup -q -n pcre-ocaml-%{version}
+%setup -q -n pcre-ocaml-release-%{version}
%build
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
-%doc LICENSE README
+%doc LICENSE README.txt
%{_libdir}/ocaml/pcre
%if %opt
%exclude %{_libdir}/ocaml/pcre/*.a
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%files devel
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
-%doc LICENSE README
+%doc LICENSE README.txt
%if %opt
%{_libdir}/ocaml/pcre/*.a
%{_libdir}/ocaml/pcre/*.cmxa
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-pcre/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.6 -r1.7
--- sources 31 Aug 2008 10:05:50 - 1.6
+++ sources 23 May 2009 08:11:09 - 1.7
@@ -1 +1 @@
-dffb7cbe2f3798f424ca8737727234ac pcre-ocaml-5.15.0.tar.bz2
+91081a9147451495f8d2b246ef196983 release-6.0.0.tar.bz2
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-pa-monad/devel ocaml-pa-monad.spec,1.7,1.8
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-pa-monad/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23964
Modified Files:
ocaml-pa-monad.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-pa-monad.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-pa-monad/devel/ocaml-pa-monad.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -p -r1.7 -r1.8
--- ocaml-pa-monad.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:13 - 1.7
+++ ocaml-pa-monad.spec 23 May 2009 08:11:50 - 1.8
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-pa-monad
Version:6.0
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml syntax extension for monads
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -61,6 +61,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 6.0-2
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-postgresql/devel .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 ocaml-postgresql.spec, 1.14, 1.15 sources, 1.5, 1.6
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-postgresql/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24222
Modified Files:
.cvsignore ocaml-postgresql.spec sources
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-postgresql/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6
--- .cvsignore 10 Mar 2009 14:06:41 - 1.5
+++ .cvsignore 23 May 2009 08:12:43 - 1.6
@@ -1 +1 @@
-release-1.10.3.tar.bz2
+release-1.11.1.tar.bz2
Index: ocaml-postgresql.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-postgresql/devel/ocaml-postgresql.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.14
retrieving revision 1.15
diff -u -p -r1.14 -r1.15
--- ocaml-postgresql.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:14 - 1.14
+++ ocaml-postgresql.spec 23 May 2009 08:12:43 - 1.15
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
%define debug_package %{nil}
Name: ocaml-postgresql
-Version:1.10.3
+Version:1.11.1
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml library for accessing PostgreSQL databases
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%files devel
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
-%doc LICENSE AUTHORS Changes README.txt examples
+%doc LICENSE AUTHORS Changelog README.txt examples
%if %opt
%{_libdir}/ocaml/postgresql/*.a
%{_libdir}/ocaml/postgresql/*.cmxa
@@ -92,6 +92,10 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 1.11.1-2
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+- New upstream version 1.11.1.
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-postgresql/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6
--- sources 10 Mar 2009 14:06:41 - 1.5
+++ sources 23 May 2009 08:12:43 - 1.6
@@ -1 +1 @@
-ebac79d610e5be1cfb39b69be2865e5d release-1.10.3.tar.bz2
+d293714bd15824db031a47d1c42c1f36 release-1.11.1.tar.bz2
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-ounit/devel ocaml-ounit.spec,1.6,1.7
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-ounit/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26054
Modified Files:
ocaml-ounit.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-ounit.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-ounit/devel/ocaml-ounit.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.6 -r1.7
--- ocaml-ounit.spec16 Apr 2009 09:06:12 - 1.6
+++ ocaml-ounit.spec23 May 2009 08:18:06 - 1.7
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-ounit
Version:1.0.3
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Release:5%{?dist}
Summary:Unit test framework for OCaml
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -90,6 +90,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 1.0.3-5
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-openin/devel ocaml-openin.spec,1.7,1.8
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-openin/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26272
Modified Files:
ocaml-openin.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-openin.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-openin/devel/ocaml-openin.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -p -r1.7 -r1.8
--- ocaml-openin.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:12 - 1.7
+++ ocaml-openin.spec 23 May 2009 08:18:55 - 1.8
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-openin
Version:20070524
-Release:7%{?dist}
+Release:8%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml syntax to locally open modules
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -70,6 +70,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 20070524-8
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-omake/devel ocaml-omake.spec,1.7,1.8
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-omake/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv26672
Modified Files:
ocaml-omake.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-omake.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-omake/devel/ocaml-omake.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -p -r1.7 -r1.8
--- ocaml-omake.spec16 Apr 2009 09:06:12 - 1.7
+++ ocaml-omake.spec23 May 2009 08:19:54 - 1.8
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
Name: ocaml-omake
Version:0.9.8.5
-Release:7%{?dist}
+Release:8%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml build system with automated dependency analysis
Group: Development/Tools
@@ -89,6 +89,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 0.9.8.5-8
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-mysql/devel ocaml-mysql.spec,1.8,1.9
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-mysql/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv27012
Modified Files:
ocaml-mysql.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-mysql.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-mysql/devel/ocaml-mysql.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -p -r1.8 -r1.9
--- ocaml-mysql.spec16 Apr 2009 09:06:10 - 1.8
+++ ocaml-mysql.spec23 May 2009 08:20:41 - 1.9
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-mysql
Version:1.0.4
-Release:8%{?dist}
+Release:9%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml library for accessing MySQL databases
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 1.0.4-9
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-libvirt/devel ocaml-libvirt.spec,1.29,1.30
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-libvirt/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28090
Modified Files:
ocaml-libvirt.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-libvirt.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-libvirt/devel/ocaml-libvirt.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.29
retrieving revision 1.30
diff -u -p -r1.29 -r1.30
--- ocaml-libvirt.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:09 - 1.29
+++ ocaml-libvirt.spec 23 May 2009 08:25:52 - 1.30
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
Name: ocaml-libvirt
Version:0.6.1.0
-Release:1%{?dist}
+Release:2%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml binding for libvirt
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -124,6 +124,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 0.6.1.0-2
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-json-static/devel ocaml-json-static.spec,1.6,1.7
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-json-static/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28522
Modified Files:
ocaml-json-static.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-json-static.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-json-static/devel/ocaml-json-static.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.6 -r1.7
--- ocaml-json-static.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:08 - 1.6
+++ ocaml-json-static.spec 23 May 2009 08:28:23 - 1.7
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-json-static
Version:0.9.6
-Release:8%{?dist}
+Release:9%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml JSON validator and converter (syntax extension)
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 0.9.6-9
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-gsl/devel ocaml-gsl.spec,1.6,1.7
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-gsl/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28989
Modified Files:
ocaml-gsl.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-gsl.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-gsl/devel/ocaml-gsl.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.6 -r1.7
--- ocaml-gsl.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:07 - 1.6
+++ ocaml-gsl.spec 23 May 2009 08:29:45 - 1.7
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-gsl
Version:0.6.0
-Release:7%{?dist}
+Release:8%{?dist}
Summary:Interface to GSL (GNU scientific library) for OCaml
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -103,6 +103,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 0.6.0-8
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-lacaml/devel .cvsignore, 1.7, 1.8 ocaml-lacaml.spec, 1.10, 1.11 sources, 1.7, 1.8
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-lacaml/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28867
Modified Files:
.cvsignore ocaml-lacaml.spec sources
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-lacaml/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -p -r1.7 -r1.8
--- .cvsignore 10 Mar 2009 14:00:40 - 1.7
+++ .cvsignore 23 May 2009 08:29:34 - 1.8
@@ -1 +1 @@
-release-4.7.6.tar.bz2
+release-5.1.0.tar.bz2
Index: ocaml-lacaml.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-lacaml/devel/ocaml-lacaml.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11
--- ocaml-lacaml.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:09 - 1.10
+++ ocaml-lacaml.spec 23 May 2009 08:29:34 - 1.11
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
%define debug_package %{nil}
Name: ocaml-lacaml
-Version:4.7.6
+Version:5.1.0
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:BLAS/LAPACK-interface for OCaml
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%files devel
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
-%doc COPYRIGHT LICENSE Changes README.txt TODO
+%doc COPYRIGHT LICENSE Changelog README.txt TODO
%if %opt
%{_libdir}/ocaml/lacaml/*.a
%{_libdir}/ocaml/lacaml/*.cmxa
@@ -98,6 +98,10 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 5.1.0-1
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1.
+- New upstream release 5.1.0.
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-lacaml/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -p -r1.7 -r1.8
--- sources 10 Mar 2009 14:00:40 - 1.7
+++ sources 23 May 2009 08:29:34 - 1.8
@@ -1 +1 @@
-6c68d34e4bd957e098470637fbdf1568 release-4.7.6.tar.bz2
+3a7da60fd0559a05ed0d1e9f7bee3537 release-5.1.0.tar.bz2
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-extlib/devel ocaml-extlib.spec,1.10,1.11
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-extlib/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30871
Modified Files:
ocaml-extlib.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-extlib.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-extlib/devel/ocaml-extlib.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11
--- ocaml-extlib.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:06 - 1.10
+++ ocaml-extlib.spec 23 May 2009 08:36:27 - 1.11
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-extlib
Version:1.5.1
-Release:6%{?dist}
+Release:7%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml ExtLib additions to the standard library
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -113,6 +113,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%{_libdir}/ocaml/extlib/*.ml
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 1.5.1-7
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-expat/devel ocaml-expat.spec,1.13,1.14
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-expat/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31172
Modified Files:
ocaml-expat.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-expat.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-expat/devel/ocaml-expat.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14
--- ocaml-expat.spec16 Apr 2009 09:06:06 - 1.13
+++ ocaml-expat.spec23 May 2009 08:37:43 - 1.14
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-expat
Version:0.9.1
-Release:15%{?dist}
+Release:16%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml wrapper for the Expat XML parsing library
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -90,6 +90,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 0.9.1-16
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-deriving/devel ocaml-deriving.spec,1.6,1.7
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-deriving/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31520
Modified Files:
ocaml-deriving.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-deriving.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-deriving/devel/ocaml-deriving.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.6 -r1.7
--- ocaml-deriving.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:05 - 1.6
+++ ocaml-deriving.spec 23 May 2009 08:39:12 - 1.7
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-deriving
Version:0.1.1a
-Release:7%{?dist}
+Release:8%{?dist}
Summary:Extension to OCaml for deriving functions from types
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -108,6 +108,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 0.1.1a-8
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-dbus/devel ocaml-dbus.spec,1.11,1.12
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-dbus/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32159
Modified Files:
ocaml-dbus.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-dbus.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-dbus/devel/ocaml-dbus.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.11
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -p -r1.11 -r1.12
--- ocaml-dbus.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:05 - 1.11
+++ ocaml-dbus.spec 23 May 2009 08:41:57 - 1.12
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-dbus
Version:0.07
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Release:5%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml library for using D-Bus
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -96,6 +96,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 0.07-5
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-curses/devel ocaml-curses.spec,1.11,1.12
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-curses/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32510
Modified Files:
ocaml-curses.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-curses.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-curses/devel/ocaml-curses.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.11
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -p -r1.11 -r1.12
--- ocaml-curses.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:04 - 1.11
+++ ocaml-curses.spec 23 May 2009 08:43:32 - 1.12
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-curses
Version:1.0.3
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Release:5%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml bindings for ncurses
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -92,6 +92,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 1.0.3-5
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-curl/devel .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 ocaml-curl.spec, 1.12, 1.13 sources, 1.3, 1.4
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-curl/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1244
Modified Files:
.cvsignore ocaml-curl.spec sources
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-curl/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4
--- .cvsignore 31 Aug 2008 09:46:38 - 1.3
+++ .cvsignore 23 May 2009 08:46:41 - 1.4
@@ -1 +1 @@
-ocurl-0.5.0.tgz
+ocurl-0.5.1.tgz
Index: ocaml-curl.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-curl/devel/ocaml-curl.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -p -r1.12 -r1.13
--- ocaml-curl.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:04 - 1.12
+++ ocaml-curl.spec 23 May 2009 08:46:41 - 1.13
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
%define debug_package %{nil}
Name: ocaml-curl
-Version:0.5.0
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Version:0.5.1
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml Curl library (ocurl)
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{ve
ExcludeArch:sparc64 s390 s390x
BuildRequires: ocaml = 3.10.0-7
-BuildRequires: ocaml-findlib-devel, curl-devel = 7.9.8
+BuildRequires: ocaml-findlib-devel, curl-devel = 7.12.0
BuildRequires: gawk
%define _use_internal_dependency_generator 0
@@ -90,6 +90,10 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 0.5.1-1
+- New upstream version 0.5.1.
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1.
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-curl/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4
--- sources 31 Aug 2008 09:46:38 - 1.3
+++ sources 23 May 2009 08:46:41 - 1.4
@@ -1 +1 @@
-65944aefd33ea9114fa1959474e5cfc4 ocurl-0.5.0.tgz
+0c6601090c9d3ef8ecb3f7b5e3c66541 ocurl-0.5.1.tgz
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-camomile/devel ocaml-camomile.spec,1.7,1.8
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-camomile/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1476
Modified Files:
ocaml-camomile.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-camomile.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-camomile/devel/ocaml-camomile.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.7
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -u -p -r1.7 -r1.8
--- ocaml-camomile.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:03 - 1.7
+++ ocaml-camomile.spec 23 May 2009 08:47:26 - 1.8
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-camomile
Version:0.7.1
-Release:10%{?dist}
+Release:11%{?dist}
Summary:Unicode library for OCaml
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -114,6 +114,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 0.7.1-11
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-calendar/devel ocaml-calendar.spec,1.12,1.13
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-calendar/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2040
Modified Files:
ocaml-calendar.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-calendar.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-calendar/devel/ocaml-calendar.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u -p -r1.12 -r1.13
--- ocaml-calendar.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:01 - 1.12
+++ ocaml-calendar.spec 23 May 2009 08:49:47 - 1.13
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-calendar
Version:2.0.4
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Release:5%{?dist}
Summary:Objective Caml library for managing dates and times
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -83,6 +83,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 2.0.4-5
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-bisect/devel ocaml-bisect.spec,1.5,1.6
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-bisect/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2792
Modified Files:
ocaml-bisect.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-bisect.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-bisect/devel/ocaml-bisect.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6
--- ocaml-bisect.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:01 - 1.5
+++ ocaml-bisect.spec 23 May 2009 08:53:49 - 1.6
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
Name: ocaml-bisect
Version:%{mainversion}
-Release:0.4.%{subversion}%{?dist}
+Release:0.5.%{subversion}%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml code coverage tool
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 1.0-0.5.alpha
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-bitstring/devel ocaml-bitstring.spec,1.11,1.12
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-bitstring/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2510
Modified Files:
ocaml-bitstring.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-bitstring.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-bitstring/devel/ocaml-bitstring.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.11
retrieving revision 1.12
diff -u -p -r1.11 -r1.12
--- ocaml-bitstring.spec16 Apr 2009 09:06:01 - 1.11
+++ ocaml-bitstring.spec23 May 2009 08:52:19 - 1.12
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
Name: ocaml-bitstring
Version:2.0.0
-Release:8%{?dist}
+Release:9%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml library for matching and constructing bitstrings
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -185,6 +185,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 2.0.0-9
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-augeas/devel ocaml-augeas.spec,1.5,1.6
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-augeas/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3349
Modified Files:
ocaml-augeas.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-augeas.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-augeas/devel/ocaml-augeas.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6
--- ocaml-augeas.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:00 - 1.5
+++ ocaml-augeas.spec 23 May 2009 08:57:01 - 1.6
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-augeas
Version:0.4
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Release:5%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml bindings for Augeas configuration API
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -95,6 +95,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 0.4-5
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-newt/devel ocaml-newt.spec,1.6,1.7
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-newt/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3582
Modified Files:
ocaml-newt.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-newt.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-newt/devel/ocaml-newt.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.6 -r1.7
--- ocaml-newt.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:11 - 1.6
+++ ocaml-newt.spec 23 May 2009 08:58:06 - 1.7
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-newt
Version:0.9
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Release:6%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml library for using newt text mode window system
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -108,6 +108,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 0.9-6
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-camlimages/devel ocaml-camlimages.spec,1.15,1.16
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-camlimages/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv5556
Modified Files:
ocaml-camlimages.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-camlimages.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-camlimages/devel/ocaml-camlimages.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -p -r1.15 -r1.16
--- ocaml-camlimages.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:02 - 1.15
+++ ocaml-camlimages.spec 23 May 2009 09:03:57 - 1.16
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
Name: ocaml-camlimages
Version:3.0.1
-Release:7%{?dist}
+Release:8%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml image processing library
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -108,6 +108,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 3.0.1-8
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-ocamlnet/devel ocaml-ocamlnet.spec,1.13,1.14
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-ocamlnet/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv28981
Modified Files:
ocaml-ocamlnet.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-ocamlnet.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-ocamlnet/devel/ocaml-ocamlnet.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.13
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -p -r1.13 -r1.14
--- ocaml-ocamlnet.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:11 - 1.13
+++ ocaml-ocamlnet.spec 23 May 2009 11:07:23 - 1.14
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
Name: ocaml-ocamlnet
Version:2.2.9
-Release:12%{?dist}
+Release:13%{?dist}
Summary:Network protocols for OCaml
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -243,6 +243,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 2.2.9-13
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-sexplib/devel .cvsignore, 1.5, 1.6 ocaml-sexplib.spec, 1.8, 1.9 sources, 1.5, 1.6
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-sexplib/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29139
Modified Files:
.cvsignore ocaml-sexplib.spec sources
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: .cvsignore
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-sexplib/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6
--- .cvsignore 10 Mar 2009 14:18:44 - 1.5
+++ .cvsignore 23 May 2009 11:07:54 - 1.6
@@ -1 +1 @@
-release-4.2.7.tar.bz2
+release-4.2.10.tar.bz2
Index: ocaml-sexplib.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-sexplib/devel/ocaml-sexplib.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -p -r1.8 -r1.9
--- ocaml-sexplib.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:16 - 1.8
+++ ocaml-sexplib.spec 23 May 2009 11:07:54 - 1.9
@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
%define debug_package %{nil}
Name: ocaml-sexplib
-Version:4.2.7
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:4.2.10
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml library for converting OCaml values to S-expressions
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -100,6 +100,10 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 22 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 4.2.10-1
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1.
+- New upstream version 4.2.10.
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
Index: sources
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-sexplib/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.5
retrieving revision 1.6
diff -u -p -r1.5 -r1.6
--- sources 10 Mar 2009 14:18:44 - 1.5
+++ sources 23 May 2009 11:07:54 - 1.6
@@ -1 +1 @@
-de6f0e46b5e85084f8f1da9c20c49085 release-4.2.7.tar.bz2
+b7d9564386a6a0eebe14d76322245291 release-4.2.10.tar.bz2
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-mikmatch/devel ocaml-mikmatch.spec,1.6,1.7
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-mikmatch/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv29003
Modified Files:
ocaml-mikmatch.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-mikmatch.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-mikmatch/devel/ocaml-mikmatch.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.6 -r1.7
--- ocaml-mikmatch.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:10 - 1.6
+++ ocaml-mikmatch.spec 23 May 2009 11:07:25 - 1.7
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-mikmatch
Version:1.0.0
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Release:6%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml extension for pattern matching with regexps
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -109,6 +109,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 1.0.0-6
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-gettext/devel ocaml-gettext.spec,1.10,1.11
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-gettext/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32365
Modified Files:
ocaml-gettext.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-gettext.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-gettext/devel/ocaml-gettext.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.10
retrieving revision 1.11
diff -u -p -r1.10 -r1.11
--- ocaml-gettext.spec 16 Apr 2009 09:06:07 - 1.10
+++ ocaml-gettext.spec 23 May 2009 11:21:21 - 1.11
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
Name: ocaml-gettext
Version:0.3.2
-Release:7%{?dist}
+Release:8%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml library for i18n
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -221,6 +221,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 0.3.2-8
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
rpms/ocaml-preludeml/devel ocaml-preludeml.spec,1.3,1.4
Author: rjones
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-preludeml/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2656
Modified Files:
ocaml-preludeml.spec
Log Message:
Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
Index: ocaml-preludeml.spec
===
RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/ocaml-preludeml/devel/ocaml-preludeml.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -p -r1.3 -r1.4
--- ocaml-preludeml.spec16 Apr 2009 09:06:15 - 1.3
+++ ocaml-preludeml.spec23 May 2009 11:31:22 - 1.4
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
Name: ocaml-preludeml
Version:0.1
-Release:0.11.%{gitdate}%{?dist}
+Release:0.12.%{gitdate}%{?dist}
Summary:OCaml utility functions
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -122,6 +122,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%changelog
+* Sat May 23 2009 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com - 0.1-0.12.20090113
+- Rebuild for OCaml 3.11.1
+
* Thu Apr 16 2009 S390x secondary arch maintainer
fedora-s3...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- ExcludeArch sparc64, s390, s390x as we don't have OCaml on those archs
(added sparc64 per request from the sparc maintainer)
___
Fedora-ocaml-list mailing list
Fedora-ocaml-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ocaml-list
