Re: Screenshot Tutorial: How to D-I-Y your own Google Chrome OS with Xen-based Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala amd64 Virtual Machine in Fedora 11 x86_64 Pv-Ops Dom0

2009-11-22 Thread suvayu ali
2009/11/22 Jussi Lehtola :
> On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 18:02 +0800, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
>> Google Chrome OS Download
>>
>> Filename: Google-Chrome-OS-Build-enming.teo-22Nov2009-0704hrs.vmdk
>>
>> Filesize: 697.38MB
>
> Or, if you simply want the Chromium browser in Fedora, just use spot's
> packages that work just fine. To do this, place
>
> [chromium]
> name=Chromium Test Packages
> baseurl=http://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium/F12/
> enabled=1
> gpgcheck=0
>
> in /etc/yum.repos.d/chromium.repo and run
>  # yum -y install chromium
> Now you have the Chromium logo in the applications menu, or you can
> start it from the terminal with
>  $ chromium-browser

I think the OP is experimenting with this ;)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chrome_OS

-- 
Suvayu

Open source is the future. It sets us free.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Subject F12 and Limewire

2009-11-22 Thread Athmane Madjoudj
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Frank Murphy (Frankly3D)
 wrote:
> On 23/11/09 07:36, Hector E. Celis wrote:
>>
>> I have been trying to install limewire on F12 and I keep getting this
>> message that there is a package missing. I have no such problem with
>> Ubuntu9.1 Unfortunately I have 2 computers and one of them will not
>> operate with Ubuntu versions grater than 6. I have no time to learn 2
>> different versions of Linux (they are to different)
>> Can you people please give me EXPLICIT instruction on how to install
>> limewire on F12
>
> Did you look at:
> http://fedorasolved.org/post-install-solutions/limewire
>
>
>> or better yet fix f12 so that limewire installs or fix the limewire
>> "package" . This is provably more useful.
>>
>> Thank you
>> Hector Celis
>>
>
> Is limewire gpl licensed?
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Frank Murphy
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>

Currently limewire is no longer distributed as rpm (now it's a deb):


0. Install  JRE (included with Fedora 12)
1. Download limeware as zip from: http://www.limewire.com/download/?os=other
2. Unzip somewhere (/home/USER/)
3. run runLime.sh

-- 
Athmane Madjoudj

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Screenshot Tutorial: How to D-I-Y your own Google Chrome OS with Xen-based Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala amd64 Virtual Machine in Fedora 11 x86_64 Pv-Ops Dom0

2009-11-22 Thread Jussi Lehtola
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 18:02 +0800, Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
> Google Chrome OS Download
> 
> Filename: Google-Chrome-OS-Build-enming.teo-22Nov2009-0704hrs.vmdk
> 
> Filesize: 697.38MB

Or, if you simply want the Chromium browser in Fedora, just use spot's
packages that work just fine. To do this, place

[chromium]
name=Chromium Test Packages
baseurl=http://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium/F12/
enabled=1
gpgcheck=0

in /etc/yum.repos.d/chromium.repo and run
 # yum -y install chromium
Now you have the Chromium logo in the applications menu, or you can
start it from the terminal with
 $ chromium-browser
-- 
Jussi Lehtola
Fedora Project Contributor
jussileht...@fedoraproject.org

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Subject F12 and Limewire

2009-11-22 Thread Frank Murphy (Frankly3D)

On 23/11/09 07:36, Hector E. Celis wrote:

I have been trying to install limewire on F12 and I keep getting this
message that there is a package missing. I have no such problem with
Ubuntu9.1 Unfortunately I have 2 computers and one of them will not
operate with Ubuntu versions grater than 6. I have no time to learn 2
different versions of Linux (they are to different)
Can you people please give me EXPLICIT instruction on how to install
limewire on F12


Did you look at:
http://fedorasolved.org/post-install-solutions/limewire



or better yet fix f12 so that limewire installs or fix the limewire
"package" . This is provably more useful.

Thank you
Hector Celis



Is limewire gpl licensed?

--
Regards,

Frank Murphy

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


F12 yum install of condor on x86_64: "Non-fatal POSTIN scriptlet failure in rpm package"

2009-11-22 Thread Rob

Hi,

I get this message on my freshly installed F12 with the condor package:

=
[...snip...]
Downloading Packages:
Setting up and reading Presto delta metadata
Processing delta metadata
Package(s) data still to download: 9.6 M
(1/3): classads-1.0.4-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm  | 236 kB 00:00 
(2/3): condor-7.2.4-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm| 9.2 MB 00:05 
(3/3): gsoap-2.7.13-2.fc12.x86_64.rpm| 182 kB 00:00 

Total   1.5 MB/s | 9.6 MB 00:06 
Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Test Succeeded
Running Transaction
  Installing : classads-1.0.4-1.fc12.x86_64 1/3 
  Installing : gsoap-2.7.13-2.fc12.x86_64   2/3 
  Installing : condor-7.2.4-1.fc12.x86_64   3/3 
Non-fatal POSTIN scriptlet failure in rpm package condor-7.2.4-1.fc12.x86_64
warning: %post(condor-7.2.4-1.fc12.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 1

Installed:
  condor.x86_64 0:7.2.4-1.fc12  

Dependency Installed:
  classads.x86_64 0:1.0.4-1.fc12  gsoap.x86_64 0:2.7.13-2.fc12 

Complete!
=

I know it says 'non-fatal'; however, by not knowing where the mesage
comes from, it worries me mainly because this is going to be crucial
condor server!

Any ideas what's going wrong?

Thanks,
Rob.


  

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Subject F12 and Limewire

2009-11-22 Thread Hector E. Celis
I have been trying to install limewire on F12 and I keep getting this message 
that there is a package missing. I have no such problem with Ubuntu9.1  
Unfortunately I have 2 computers and one of them will not operate with Ubuntu 
versions grater than 6.  I have no time to learn 2 different versions of Linux 
(they are to different)
Can you people please give me EXPLICIT instruction on how to install limewire 
on F12
or better yet fix f12 so that limewire installs or fix the limewire "package" . 
This is provably more useful.

Thank you
Hector Celis

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Autofs under Fedora-12

2009-11-22 Thread Mogens Kjaer

On 11/23/2009 12:58 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:


I meant the mount command:
sudo mount alfred:/common /common


Why do you use autofs at all if you give a command
to do the mounting?

I would have made (after umount /common and removing
the empty folder /common):

ln -s /net/alfred/common /common

then autofs does the mounting automatically as soon as you
access the /common folder.

Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg A/S, Computer Department
Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
Phone: +45 33 27 53 25, Mobile: +45 22 12 53 25
Email: m...@crc.dk Homepage: http://www.crc.dk

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Screenshot Tutorial: How to D-I-Y your own Google Chrome OS with Xen-based Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala amd64 Virtual Machine in Fedora 11 x86_64 Pv-Ops Dom0

2009-11-22 Thread Ed Greshko
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
>
>
> > Filesize: 697.38MB
> >
> > Type: VMware VMDK image file
> >
> > MD5 Checksum: 1aec57157dd2083b166e493c0e831a
> > 67
> >
> > Download link: http://www.zshare.net/download/68819648ff817281/
> FYI, this download always terminates after ~237Kat least
> attempting
> to download from Taiwan.
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Do you know where would be a good and fast file sharing site I could
> upload to?
>
> The Google Chrome OS image that I built is about 700 MB.
Sorry, I don't.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: could the "missing codec" redirection be more informative?

2009-11-22 Thread Ed Greshko
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>   
>> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> 
>>> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>>
>>>   
 Robert P. J. Day wrote:
 
>
>   
>>>   i wasn't suggesting that the diagnostic solve the problem.  but
>>> would it be unacceptable for it to give *general* advice about
>>> possibly adding extra repositories to your system, and by the way,
>>> here's a page with a list of possible repos, do with them what you
>>> will.
>>>
>>>   is that unreasonable?
>>>
>>>   
>> Yes, it is likely unreasonable.  Again, the advice is not "general"
>> it is being given in response to a specific issue.
>>
>> If I talk about ways to defeating different alarm systems on a car
>> without having been prompted for advice I am just talking about it.
>> But, if someone saysI tried breaking into a Lexus but couldn't
>> and I respond with even general advice it is pretty clear what my
>> intentions are.  I'm intending to instruct you how to break into a
>> Lexus.  It is the "intent" that matters.
>> 
>
>   oh, balls.  a page from fedoraproject.org:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OtherRepositories
>
> *explicitly* refers readers to rpmfusion.org, for the following
> reason:
>
> "There are a number of third-party software repositories for Fedora
> that provide software packages that Fedora excludes for various
> reasons. These software repositories are not officially affiliated or
> endorsed by the Fedora Project. Use them at your own discretion."
>
> are you seriously suggesting that it would now be legally problematic
> to go here:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageKit_Items_Not_Found#Missing_Codec
>
> and add a line reading nothing more than:
>
> "you might want to read this page over here (linking to that first
> page)."
>
>   that strikes me as hair-splitting of the finest kind, and i can't
> believe that a half-competent lawyer couldn't figure out a way to do
> that.
>   
Yes...I am suggesting that it would be legally problematic for fedora to
tell the users for each and every very *explicit* problem they are
having to *explicitly* go to some place to find software to install to
violate the law.

The notice about other repositories is general and not saying it solves
a *explicit/specific* problem.
 
I am also pretty sure that your approach would have been talked about by
the legal team of Red Hat and rejected for just that reason.

This would be an endless debate on this list...that has been endlessly
debated on this list in various forms for a long time.

Yet the bottom line is...it was a legal decision that was made by folks
who could end up being defendants in any suit.






signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: could the "missing codec" redirection be more informative?

2009-11-22 Thread Rex Dieter
Robert P. J. Day wrote:

>   oh, balls.  a page from fedoraproject.org:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OtherRepositories
> 
> *explicitly* refers readers to rpmfusion.org, for the following
> reason:
> 
> "There are a number of third-party software repositories for Fedora
> that provide software packages that Fedora excludes for various
> reasons. These software repositories are not officially affiliated or
> endorsed by the Fedora Project. Use them at your own discretion."
> 
> are you seriously suggesting that it would now be legally problematic
> to go here:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageKit_Items_Not_Found#Missing_Codec

Yes.  Other repositories can be mentioned, but only if particulars about 
their contents not be mentioned. (That was the guideline laid out by fedora 
legal).  Else, it risks contributory infringement.  IANAL, and all that.

-- Rex

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Screenshot Tutorial: How to D-I-Y your own Google Chrome OS with Xen-based Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala amd64 Virtual Machine in Fedora 11 x86_64 Pv-Ops Dom0

2009-11-22 Thread Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Ed Greshko  wrote:

> Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
> > _*Google Chrome OS Download*_
> >
> > Filename: Google-Chrome-OS-Build-enming.teo-22Nov2009-0704hrs.vmdk
> >
> > Filesize: 697.38MB
> >
> > Type: VMware VMDK image file
> >
> > MD5 Checksum: 1aec57157dd2083b166e493c0e831a
> > 67
> >
> > Download link: http://www.zshare.net/download/68819648ff817281/
> FYI, this download always terminates after ~237Kat least attempting
> to download from Taiwan.
>

Hi,

Do you know where would be a good and fast file sharing site I could upload
to?

The Google Chrome OS image that I built is about 700 MB.

-- 
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Dip(Mechatronics) BEng(Hons)(Mechanical
Engineering)
Alma Maters:
(1) Singapore Polytechnic
(2) National University of Singapore
My Primary Blog: http://teo-en-ming-aka-zhang-enming.blogspot.com
My Secondary Blog: http://enmingteo.wordpress.com
My Youtube videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/enmingteo
Email: space.time.unive...@gmail.com
Mobile Phone (Starhub Prepaid): +65-8369-2618
Street: Bedok Reservoir Road
Country: Singapore
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: could the "missing codec" redirection be more informative?

2009-11-22 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Ed Greshko wrote:

> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >
> >> Robert P. J. Day wrote:

> >   i wasn't suggesting that the diagnostic solve the problem.  but
> > would it be unacceptable for it to give *general* advice about
> > possibly adding extra repositories to your system, and by the way,
> > here's a page with a list of possible repos, do with them what you
> > will.
> >
> >   is that unreasonable?
> >
> Yes, it is likely unreasonable.  Again, the advice is not "general"
> it is being given in response to a specific issue.
>
> If I talk about ways to defeating different alarm systems on a car
> without having been prompted for advice I am just talking about it.
> But, if someone saysI tried breaking into a Lexus but couldn't
> and I respond with even general advice it is pretty clear what my
> intentions are.  I'm intending to instruct you how to break into a
> Lexus.  It is the "intent" that matters.

  oh, balls.  a page from fedoraproject.org:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OtherRepositories

*explicitly* refers readers to rpmfusion.org, for the following
reason:

"There are a number of third-party software repositories for Fedora
that provide software packages that Fedora excludes for various
reasons. These software repositories are not officially affiliated or
endorsed by the Fedora Project. Use them at your own discretion."

are you seriously suggesting that it would now be legally problematic
to go here:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageKit_Items_Not_Found#Missing_Codec

and add a line reading nothing more than:

"you might want to read this page over here (linking to that first
page)."

  that strikes me as hair-splitting of the finest kind, and i can't
believe that a half-competent lawyer couldn't figure out a way to do
that.

rday
--


Robert P. J. Day   Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:  http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:   http://twitter.com/rpjday


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: No Flash/sound in F12 Firefox

2009-11-22 Thread Robert G. (Doc) Savage

On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 04:21 +, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
> On Monday 23 November 2009 01:20:22 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> > Can someone post a few URLs of websites where the x86_64 flash plugin
> > actually works?
> 
> For example,
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/
> http://isohunt.com/
> http://www.formula1.com/
> 
> to name a few. Any site with flash I came across works without any problems 
> here.
> 
> firefox-3.5.5-1.fc12.x86_64
> libflashplayer-10.0.32.18.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz

Marko,

Does flashplayer appear in your Firefox about:plugin? In mine it does
not.

--Doc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: No Flash/sound in F12 Firefox

2009-11-22 Thread Frank Cox

On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 23:34 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Try this one:
> 
> http://www.verisign.com/domain-name-services/find-registrar/index.html
> 
> The flash on this page kills my Firefox, with the same plugin version
> that 
> you're running.

That page works fine for me with the listed 64-bit flashplayer and
firefox-3.0.15-3.el5.centos (on Centos 5.4)

I don't have a 64-bit Fedora machine to try it on.  But it's not the
64-bit flash plugin that's causing your crash.

-- 
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Screenshot Tutorial: How to D-I-Y your own Google Chrome OS with Xen-based Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala amd64 Virtual Machine in Fedora 11 x86_64 Pv-Ops Dom0

2009-11-22 Thread Ed Greshko
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote:
> _*Google Chrome OS Download*_
>
> Filename: Google-Chrome-OS-Build-enming.teo-22Nov2009-0704hrs.vmdk
>
> Filesize: 697.38MB
>
> Type: VMware VMDK image file
>
> MD5 Checksum: 1aec57157dd2083b166e493c0e831a
> 67
>
> Download link: http://www.zshare.net/download/68819648ff817281/
FYI, this download always terminates after ~237Kat least attempting
to download from Taiwan.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: No Flash/sound in F12 Firefox

2009-11-22 Thread Sam Varshavchik

Marko Vojinovic writes:


On Monday 23 November 2009 01:20:22 Sam Varshavchik wrote:

Can someone post a few URLs of websites where the x86_64 flash plugin
actually works?


For example,

http://www.youtube.com/
http://isohunt.com/
http://www.formula1.com/

to name a few. Any site with flash I came across works without any problems 
here.


firefox-3.5.5-1.fc12.x86_64
libflashplayer-10.0.32.18.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz


Heh -- I figured youboob would work. Well, looks like it works for me too, 
mostly. I just don't use it that much :-)


Try this one:

http://www.verisign.com/domain-name-services/find-registrar/index.html

The flash on this page kills my Firefox, with the same plugin version that 
you're running.




pgp4dIb7O1ECg.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: F12 on a P4

2009-11-22 Thread Marcel Rieux
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Alan Cox  wrote:

> Pentium Pro is the original "i686" system.

And since it was introduced in 1995, if your computer is less than 14
years old, you'll be doing fine.

No way Fedora is about to adopt OS X manners, Mr Konstam. Sleep tight :)

On a Pro, I'm afraid the RAM would have to be updated, though, even
for text mode. Here's a source for an HP Vectra XW Pentium Pro 200 :

http://www.pcmemorystore.com/HP-Vectra-XW_Pentium_Pro_200-ram.htm

How about paying $278.92 for 64 MB of RAM?

I suppose Fedora decided to drop i586 support just to make sure that
people don't get into even more stupid deals :)

Lng live Linux!

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: No Flash/sound in F12 Firefox

2009-11-22 Thread Marko Vojinovic
On Monday 23 November 2009 01:20:22 Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Can someone post a few URLs of websites where the x86_64 flash plugin
> actually works?

For example,

http://www.youtube.com/
http://isohunt.com/
http://www.formula1.com/

to name a few. Any site with flash I came across works without any problems 
here.

firefox-3.5.5-1.fc12.x86_64
libflashplayer-10.0.32.18.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz

HTH, :-)
Marko

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: anti-spam UOL

2009-11-22 Thread jdow

From: "Gene Heskett" 
Sent: Friday, 2009/November/20 11:27



Please forcibly unsubscribe this person from the list.
From:
AntiSpam UOL 

I'll be damned if I'm going to put up with one of his reject messages for
every legit post I make to this list.

This uol.com.br server has been a major pain for all internet email users 
for

several years.  Black hole it, whatever it takes to send them a message.

--
Cheers, Gene


Gene, I have not seen anything irritating from UOL for years. This is not
the first dumb-t**d from Brazil who found himself irritating the list.

===8<---
:0:
* ^From: AntiSpam UOL <@uol\.com\.br>
# uncomment this for delivery to NULL
#/dev/null
# uncomment this for delivery to a collection directory if desired
$HOME/mail/uol_crap
===8<---

I check that directory maybe once a year to see if the problem has popped
up again. This message is chiefly to see if I need to tweak the rule.

{^_-} 


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: sound card configuration

2009-11-22 Thread stan
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:58:56 +0100
François Patte  wrote:

Note that I'm running F12 x86_64 so there might be some differences
between your system and mine.

> >> My sound card (Realtek ALC 882 integrated on Asus P5WD2 mobo) is
> >> working but the sound is not clear: a lot of interferences (b,
> >> criccroc...), so, in piano passages of record, I can ear more
> >> electronic sounds than music
> >>
> >> Is there a way to have no background noise?

> >  On the fly resampling can lead to artifacts
> > such as you describe.
> > 
> > The sound card does the best it can under all circumstances given
> > the input and output.  There really isn't any configuration unless
> > you are using the wrong driver.
> 
> I did not install any driver, the sound card was working out of the
> box after install.
> 
> How can check this point? And, if necessary, where can I find the good
> driver?

Type the commandaplay -l  .  If it says something like 
hda-intel alc882
then you are using the driver that alsa provides for your device.  It
is possible that the driver has an error in it.  To check if the driver
is working properly go into 
Applications->Sound & Video->Mixers->Pulseaudio volume control.
Go to the last tab, configuration, and select off from the drop down
list.  Then play some music using alsa directly instead of pulseaudio.
If the noise is still there, it is the driver.  If this isn't present
on your system, you might be able to use   pulseaudio --kill   to
accomplish the same thing.

For instance if you use audio player to play a song from a CD, make
sure that the preference says to use alsa and that the frequency shows
as 44100 while playing.  Alsa too has a simple mixer that is very crude
and so can introduce noise.  By making sure that the sound is playing
at the recorded rate you eliminate any possible resampling.

> > How does it get to the sound card?
> 
> This, I don't understand/know. pulseaudio is working. I am a member of
> pulse-rt group.

I thought there might be some intermediate processing before the sound
reached the sound card.

> > 
> > Is pulseaudio running?  Have you configured it with pavucontrol?
> 
> I don't understand how to configure anything with this: I can only
> modify a level, but how can I know what is the good level?

I think you are thinking of the vu meters.  The application I am
referring to here is the one above used to adjust volume and
configuration.  I meant have you selected it to use the proper output
format, e.g. stereo analog or digital 5.1, etc.
> 
> > 
> > Are frame rates consistent throughout?
> 
> I don't understand this question!
> 

CDs play at 44100, DVDs at 48000, streaming radio can be many different
rates.  If pulseaudio is running it can only use one rate, say 48000
and everything else has to be resampled to that rate.  So a CD song at
44100 has to be turned into 48000.  This can create noise.  The reason
this has to be done is that most computer sound devices do not do
hardware mixing / resampling, so you can't send them sound streams of
different frame rates.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: The recent ssl vulnerability

2009-11-22 Thread Todd Zullinger
Gene Heskett wrote:
> True, but I have little control over that other than threatening to
> move my money.  That has generally been sufficient so far, and has
> cured several cases of blue smoke emitting from both my ears. :-)
> But this was I read, a problem on my end, not the banks problem.
> This one I was under the impression was up to me to fix.  Is this
> not the case?  Both ends have to be fixed?
>
> Please elaborate.

AFAIK, both sides need to be fixed.  But I can't elaborate because
I've only read a little about this problem.  A number of the links in
the bugzilla entry have more details and are probably quicker and
better sources of information that I could hope to be. :)

-- 
ToddOpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~
No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American
public.
-- H. L. Mencken



pgpm4wAzhS9LG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: The recent ssl vulnerability

2009-11-22 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 22 November 2009, Todd Zullinger wrote:
>Gene Heskett wrote:
>> Is there any chance of getting the fixed openssl-0.9.8i for F10?
>>
>> This has stopped my ability to do any online banking, and with all
>> the horror stories about regarding loss of X when upgrading to F12,
>> I really don't want to destroy a working system just to get this
>> security fixed library.  What we F10 users have now:
>> openssl-0.9.8g-14.fc10.i686
>>
>> So we are way more than one security fix behind.
>
>Not really.  Just because the version number isn't the very latest
>doesn't mean the openssl maintainer hasn't backported security fixes.
>
>In the case of the recent session renegotiation vulnerabilities, there
>are some comments in bugzilla about why this has not been pushed as an
>update yet: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533125#c37
>
>I haven't read up on all the details, but wouldn't ensuring that your
>bank had upgraded their systems be equally, if not more, important in
>deciding whether you can trust them?
>
True, but I have little control over that other than threatening to move my 
money.  That has generally been sufficient so far, and has cured several 
cases of blue smoke emitting from both my ears. :-)  But this was I read, a 
problem on my end, not the banks problem.  This one I was under the 
impression was up to me to fix.  Is this not the case?  Both ends have to be 
fixed?

Please elaborate.

Thanks.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
The NRA is offering FREE Associate memberships to anyone who wants them.


Am I in GRADUATE SCHOOL yet?

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: No Flash/sound in F12 Firefox

2009-11-22 Thread Robert G. (Doc) Savage

On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 00:59 +, Steve Searle wrote:
> Around 12:51am on Monday, November 23, 2009 (UK time), Robert G. (Doc) Savage 
> scrawled:
> 
> > I'm trying to get Flash and sound working in Firefox for F12, I followed
> > the instructions in
> > http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=205642 to the letter to
> > install flash-plugin-10.0.32.18-4.x86-64. Afterwards about:plugins in
> > Firefox shows no trace of the 64-bit flash plugin, and Firefox still has
> > no Flash video or sound support.
> 
> Try this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Flash#For_x86_64
> 
> It worked fine for me.

Steve,

That's where I found the fedoraforum link in my post. What does
about:plugins show in your system?

--Doc

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: No Flash/sound in F12 Firefox

2009-11-22 Thread Sam Varshavchik

Steve Searle writes:


Around 12:51am on Monday, November 23, 2009 (UK time), Robert G. (Doc) Savage 
scrawled:


I'm trying to get Flash and sound working in Firefox for F12, I followed
the instructions in
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=205642 to the letter to
install flash-plugin-10.0.32.18-4.x86-64. Afterwards about:plugins in
Firefox shows no trace of the 64-bit flash plugin, and Firefox still has
no Flash video or sound support.


Try this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Flash#For_x86_64

It worked fine for me.


Can someone post a few URLs of websites where the x86_64 flash plugin 
actually works?


I've yet to find one. The x86_64 flash plugin reliably crashes my Firefox on 
every flash page I try to open, which works fine on i386.


So I ended up uninstalling it.




pgppqAHDKnmQs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: The recent ssl vulnerability

2009-11-22 Thread Todd Zullinger
Gene Heskett wrote:
> Is there any chance of getting the fixed openssl-0.9.8i for F10?
>
> This has stopped my ability to do any online banking, and with all
> the horror stories about regarding loss of X when upgrading to F12,
> I really don't want to destroy a working system just to get this
> security fixed library.  What we F10 users have now:
> openssl-0.9.8g-14.fc10.i686
>
> So we are way more than one security fix behind.

Not really.  Just because the version number isn't the very latest
doesn't mean the openssl maintainer hasn't backported security fixes.

In the case of the recent session renegotiation vulnerabilities, there
are some comments in bugzilla about why this has not been pushed as an
update yet: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533125#c37

I haven't read up on all the details, but wouldn't ensuring that your
bank had upgraded their systems be equally, if not more, important in
deciding whether you can trust them?

-- 
ToddOpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~
Anyone who in discussion relies upon authority uses, not his
understanding, but rather his memory.
-- Leonardo Da Vinci



pgp1DyupLEHXa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: could the "missing codec" redirection be more informative?

2009-11-22 Thread Ed Greshko
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>   
>> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> 
>>> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Ed Greshko wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>   
 Robert P. J. Day wrote:

 
>   on a fresh (and barely configured) f12 system, i tried to view
> my first online .wmv file and was redirected here:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageKit_Items_Not_Found#Missing_Codec
>
> which is moderately informative in terms of telling me what the
> problem is, but utterly useless in terms of telling me how to fix
> it.
>
>   yes, i realize the issues surrounding codecs, but would it be
> unduly difficult to add to that section some advice on where to
> *find* such codecs?  you know, point readers at rpmfusion or some
> such?  is that not a legally acceptable thing to do?  because
> that's *exactly* the sort of thing that will drive newcomers to
> fedora totally nuts.
>
>
>   
 AFAIK, it is not legally acceptable to explicitly tell someone how
 to break the law.

 I hope nobody starts to argue about how silly they think these laws
 are.

 
>>>   um ... ok.  in that case, why is fedoraproject.org explicitly
>>> pointing people at rpmfusion.org here?
>>>
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OtherRepositories
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>> But, they are not explicitly solving a given problem for you.
>> Subtle difference.
>> 
>
>   i wasn't suggesting that the diagnostic solve the problem.  but
> would it be unacceptable for it to give *general* advice about
> possibly adding extra repositories to your system, and by the way,
> here's a page with a list of possible repos, do with them what you
> will.
>
>   is that unreasonable?
>   
Yes, it is likely unreasonable.   Again, the advice is not "general" it
is being given in response to a specific issue.

If I talk about ways to defeating different alarm systems on a car
without having been prompted for advice I am just talking about it. 
But, if someone saysI tried breaking into a Lexus but couldn't and I
respond with even general advice it is pretty clear what my intentions
are.  I'm intending to instruct you how to break into a Lexus.   It is
the "intent" that matters.





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: could the "missing codec" redirection be more informative?

2009-11-22 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Ed Greshko wrote:

> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >>
> >>>   on a fresh (and barely configured) f12 system, i tried to view
> >>> my first online .wmv file and was redirected here:
> >>>
> >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageKit_Items_Not_Found#Missing_Codec
> >>>
> >>> which is moderately informative in terms of telling me what the
> >>> problem is, but utterly useless in terms of telling me how to fix
> >>> it.
> >>>
> >>>   yes, i realize the issues surrounding codecs, but would it be
> >>> unduly difficult to add to that section some advice on where to
> >>> *find* such codecs?  you know, point readers at rpmfusion or some
> >>> such?  is that not a legally acceptable thing to do?  because
> >>> that's *exactly* the sort of thing that will drive newcomers to
> >>> fedora totally nuts.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> AFAIK, it is not legally acceptable to explicitly tell someone how
> >> to break the law.
> >>
> >> I hope nobody starts to argue about how silly they think these laws
> >> are.
> >>
> >
> >   um ... ok.  in that case, why is fedoraproject.org explicitly
> > pointing people at rpmfusion.org here?
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OtherRepositories
> >
> >
> But, they are not explicitly solving a given problem for you.
> Subtle difference.

  i wasn't suggesting that the diagnostic solve the problem.  but
would it be unacceptable for it to give *general* advice about
possibly adding extra repositories to your system, and by the way,
here's a page with a list of possible repos, do with them what you
will.

  is that unreasonable?

rday
--


Robert P. J. Day   Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:  http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:   http://twitter.com/rpjday


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: No Flash/sound in F12 Firefox

2009-11-22 Thread Steve Searle
Around 12:51am on Monday, November 23, 2009 (UK time), Robert G. (Doc) Savage 
scrawled:

> I'm trying to get Flash and sound working in Firefox for F12, I followed
> the instructions in
> http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=205642 to the letter to
> install flash-plugin-10.0.32.18-4.x86-64. Afterwards about:plugins in
> Firefox shows no trace of the 64-bit flash plugin, and Firefox still has
> no Flash video or sound support.

Try this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Flash#For_x86_64

It worked fine for me.

Steve

-- 
 
(o< www.stevesearle.com
//\ Powered by Fedora
V_/_No MS products were used in the creation of this message

 00:59:13 up 17 days,  6:16,  1 user,  load average: 0.37, 0.32, 0.13


pgpN1ZZbLv8Ea.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: could the "missing codec" redirection be more informative?

2009-11-22 Thread Ed Greshko
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Ed Greshko wrote:
>
>   
>> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> 
>>>   on a fresh (and barely configured) f12 system, i tried to view
>>> my first online .wmv file and was redirected here:
>>>
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageKit_Items_Not_Found#Missing_Codec
>>>
>>> which is moderately informative in terms of telling me what the
>>> problem is, but utterly useless in terms of telling me how to fix
>>> it.
>>>
>>>   yes, i realize the issues surrounding codecs, but would it be
>>> unduly difficult to add to that section some advice on where to
>>> *find* such codecs?  you know, point readers at rpmfusion or some
>>> such?  is that not a legally acceptable thing to do?  because
>>> that's *exactly* the sort of thing that will drive newcomers to
>>> fedora totally nuts.
>>>
>>>   
>> AFAIK, it is not legally acceptable to explicitly tell someone how
>> to break the law.
>>
>> I hope nobody starts to argue about how silly they think these laws
>> are.
>> 
>
>   um ... ok.  in that case, why is fedoraproject.org explicitly
> pointing people at rpmfusion.org here?
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OtherRepositories
>
>   
But, they are not explicitly solving a given problem for you.   Subtle
difference.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: could the "missing codec" redirection be more informative?

2009-11-22 Thread Todd Zullinger
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> um ... ok.  in that case, why is fedoraproject.org explicitly
> pointing people at rpmfusion.org here?
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OtherRepositories

IIRC, it's because it is allowed to do so in such a general sense.
But pointing directly to a particular codec package or automatically
enabling it when you try to use such a codec crosses the line into
contributory infringement.

Most of what can be done within the confines of U.S. law is being
done.  The legal team at Red Hat are pretty good folks, IMO.

-- 
ToddOpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of
people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.
-- Douglas Adams



pgpRxzkMcvsex.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

No Flash/sound in F12 Firefox

2009-11-22 Thread Robert G. (Doc) Savage
I'm trying to get Flash and sound working in Firefox for F12, I followed
the instructions in
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=205642 to the letter to
install flash-plugin-10.0.32.18-4.x86-64. Afterwards about:plugins in
Firefox shows no trace of the 64-bit flash plugin, and Firefox still has
no Flash video or sound support.

This is supposed to work, but in my case it obviously does not.
Suggestions?

--Doc Savage
  Fairview Heights, IL


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: could the "missing codec" redirection be more informative?

2009-11-22 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009, Ed Greshko wrote:

> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >   on a fresh (and barely configured) f12 system, i tried to view
> > my first online .wmv file and was redirected here:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageKit_Items_Not_Found#Missing_Codec
> >
> > which is moderately informative in terms of telling me what the
> > problem is, but utterly useless in terms of telling me how to fix
> > it.
> >
> >   yes, i realize the issues surrounding codecs, but would it be
> > unduly difficult to add to that section some advice on where to
> > *find* such codecs?  you know, point readers at rpmfusion or some
> > such?  is that not a legally acceptable thing to do?  because
> > that's *exactly* the sort of thing that will drive newcomers to
> > fedora totally nuts.
> >
> AFAIK, it is not legally acceptable to explicitly tell someone how
> to break the law.
>
> I hope nobody starts to argue about how silly they think these laws
> are.

  um ... ok.  in that case, why is fedoraproject.org explicitly
pointing people at rpmfusion.org here?

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OtherRepositories

rday
--



Robert P. J. Day   Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:  http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:   http://twitter.com/rpjday


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: could the "missing codec" redirection be more informative?

2009-11-22 Thread Ed Greshko
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>   on a fresh (and barely configured) f12 system, i tried to view my
> first online .wmv file and was redirected here:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageKit_Items_Not_Found#Missing_Codec
>
> which is moderately informative in terms of telling me what the
> problem is, but utterly useless in terms of telling me how to fix it.
>
>   yes, i realize the issues surrounding codecs, but would it be unduly
> difficult to add to that section some advice on where to *find* such
> codecs?  you know, point readers at rpmfusion or some such?  is that
> not a legally acceptable thing to do?  because that's *exactly* the
> sort of thing that will drive newcomers to fedora totally nuts.
>   
AFAIK, it is not legally acceptable to explicitly tell someone how to
break the law.

I hope nobody starts to argue about how silly they think these laws are.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: f12 ff/X crash and notes [SOLVED]

2009-11-22 Thread Skunk Worx

On 11/21/2009 02:25 PM, Skunk Worx wrote:

Hi,

Questions :

When I visit www.newegg.com in FF, FF and X crash to the login screen.
This is a X86_64 system using AMD and an AGP ati card (X800). I tried
moving .mozilla out of the way and generating a new one but this did not
help. Does anyone else see this?

 [ and wiki.centos.org ]


I should have read the release notes more closely.

Creating an /etc/X11/xorg.conf and adding :

Option "AccelMethod" "XAA"

...to the "Device" section for the radeon driver fixed this for both 
websites.


---
John

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


could the "missing codec" redirection be more informative?

2009-11-22 Thread Robert P. J. Day

  on a fresh (and barely configured) f12 system, i tried to view my
first online .wmv file and was redirected here:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageKit_Items_Not_Found#Missing_Codec

which is moderately informative in terms of telling me what the
problem is, but utterly useless in terms of telling me how to fix it.

  yes, i realize the issues surrounding codecs, but would it be unduly
difficult to add to that section some advice on where to *find* such
codecs?  you know, point readers at rpmfusion or some such?  is that
not a legally acceptable thing to do?  because that's *exactly* the
sort of thing that will drive newcomers to fedora totally nuts.

rday
--


Robert P. J. Day   Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:  http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:   http://twitter.com/rpjday


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Autofs under Fedora-12

2009-11-22 Thread Timothy Murphy
Ed Greshko wrote:

>> Is there a problem with autofs/automount under Fedora-12?
>>
>> I have exactly the same settings that I had in Fedora-11,
>> but the mount command is not being completed at boot-time,
>> although I have no problem giving it later by hand.
>> 
> I'm a bit confused about what command you're giving later.

Thanks for your response.

I meant the mount command:
sudo mount alfred:/common /common

> I've used autofs before and don't recall any commands to get it to
> work.  The automount command modifies the auto.master file and the file
> system would get mounted when the directory is accessed.

I have exactly the same auto.master as before:
---
# special mount point defined by direct map file
/-  auto_direct
---
and exactly the same auto_direct
---
/common -rw,sync alfred:/common
---

> Could it be that you don't have the autofs service starting at boot
> time?  chkconfig --list autofs

---
[...@rose ~]$ chkconfig --list autofs
autofs  0:off   1:off   2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off
---

I just checked on another similar (Thinkpad T43) computer running Fedora-12.
Automount/autofs works fine on this machine.

Thinking about it, I suspect the problem lies in NetworkManager.
In both cases the mount is over WiFi.

I notice that NM takes longer to start than it used to
on the T43 where autofs does not work.


-- 
Timothy Murphy  
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: f12 yum/rpm commands to list all dependencies on a library

2009-11-22 Thread Skunk Worx

On 11/21/2009 08:37 PM, Tony Nelson wrote:

On 09-11-21 21:07:14, Skunk Worx wrote:

On f12 I see a package called oprofile-gui depends on the qt3-3.8b
rpm.

What command(s) can I run inside a local repo (where all the rpm
packages are) that will tell me how many f12 "Everything" packages
are still using qt3?


 # repoquery --whatrequires --alldeps qt3

You may need to specify the repository with
"--repofrompath=," see `man repoquery`.



What command(s) can I run for the locally installed package set that
will tell me how many packages are still using qt3?


Well, there's always `yum remove qt3` and answer "no" (as long as
"assumeyes" is not set).



I have a project that I am porting to x86_64/qt4 and would prefer not
to mix the two subsystems on my development machine.

The /etc/profile.d/qt* files are currently pointing the default
QTDIR, QTINC, QTLIB, and PATH variables at qt-3.3 locations even
though I'v installed qt-devel which is qt-4.5.


Possibly this is a use for a chroot, or maybe mock or even mach.  (I
have not done this.)



I used both of the suggestions and they do exactly what I want.

There are 257 qt3 projects in the repo, many of which are explicitly qt3 
named so the actual list could be shorteronly oprofile_gui is 
currently installed and requiring qt3.


Still undecided on whether to remove the gui and risk future breakage by 
changing the paths or running chroot etc.


Thanks,
John

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: f12 how can I fix my thrashed gnome panels

2009-11-22 Thread Skunk Worx

On 11/22/2009 02:09 PM, Antonio M wrote:

2009/11/22 Skunk Worx:

Hi,

I thrashed my gnome panel geometries-- some components are in bad locations
or not working properly, etc.

I had my KVM on another machine while f12 booted, then I logged in at the
wrong (low) resolution to restart runlevel 5 (1,5) and this thrashed them
for high res. going forward. Reboot, etc. doesn't fix them.

Is there a way to regenerate the panels with the correct geometry or should
I just rebuild my account from scratch?

Thanks,
John



I think that removing .gconf and .gconfd shoul do the trick.




Thanks Antonio, they are back to normal now.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Nvidia

2009-11-22 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 2:11 PM, cibertazzi2001
 wrote:
> I have one Nvidia 9600 gt How do I do works in fedora12 ?
> Regards
> Caio

The built in nouveau[1] works well enough for me accept it leaves the
very noisy fan at full speed so I use the propriatary driver from
Nvidia through rpmfusion[2].

Richard

[1] http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/
[2] http://rpmfusion.org/Howto/nVidia

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Nvidia

2009-11-22 Thread cibertazzi2001

I have one Nvidia 9600 gt How do I do works in fedora12 ?
Regards
Caio

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: f12 how can I fix my thrashed gnome panels

2009-11-22 Thread Antonio M
2009/11/22 Skunk Worx :
> Hi,
>
> I thrashed my gnome panel geometries-- some components are in bad locations
> or not working properly, etc.
>
> I had my KVM on another machine while f12 booted, then I logged in at the
> wrong (low) resolution to restart runlevel 5 (1,5) and this thrashed them
> for high res. going forward. Reboot, etc. doesn't fix them.
>
> Is there a way to regenerate the panels with the correct geometry or should
> I just rebuild my account from scratch?
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>

I think that removing .gconf and .gconfd shoul do the trick.


-- 
Antonio Montagnani
Skype : antoniomontag
SIP: antoniomon...@ekiga.net

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: F12: ssh change port number

2009-11-22 Thread Roberto Ragusa
Soo-Hyun Choi wrote:
> 
> Hooray, yes, I have overlooked the iptables settings - I thought there
> wasn't any firewall rules as it was just a fresh installation, but
> there were! I have disabled the iptables, and everything is working
> fine now.

You should add a rule for the new port and reenable the firewall.
(if you use a port != 22 you are interested in security, I suppose)


-- 
   Roberto Ragusamail at robertoragusa.it

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


keyboard problem after F12 upgrade

2009-11-22 Thread Craig White
Upgrade didn't go exactly as planned and I have it mostly cleaned up but
one thing is driving me crazy now, it's the keyboard.

When I press the down arrow on the keyboard, it sends a  and
puts me on a new line whether I am in Konsole, or Evolution or ? but not
in a a virtual console . Changed user...same problem.
Changed to GNOME...same problem.

Reinstalled (via yum reinstall ...)
 xorg-x11-xkb-utils 
 xorg-x11-drv-keyboard 
 xorg-x11-utils
 bash
 xkeyboard-config

xev reports...

down arrow...
KeyPress event, serial 34, synthetic NO, window 0x3c1,
root 0x122, subw 0x0, time 7393966, (-395,37), root:(703,841),
state 0x0, keycode 104 (keysym 0xff8d, KP_Enter), same_screen YES,
"   XLookupString gives 1 bytes: (0d) "
"   XmbLookupString gives 1 bytes: (0d) "
XFilterEvent returns: False

KeyRelease event, serial 34, synthetic NO, window 0x3c1,
root 0x122, subw 0x0, time 7394126, (-395,37), root:(703,841),
state 0x0, keycode 104 (keysym 0xff8d, KP_Enter), same_screen YES,
"   XLookupString gives 1 bytes: (0d) "
XFilterEvent returns: False

up arrow (which doesn't flip through history in Konsole :-)

KeyPress event, serial 31, synthetic NO, window 0x3c1,
root 0x122, subw 0x0, time 7391753, (-395,37), root:(703,841),
state 0x0, keycode 98 (keysym 0xff26, Katakana), same_screen YES,
XLookupString gives 0 bytes: 
XmbLookupString gives 0 bytes:   
XFilterEvent returns: False  

KeyRelease event, serial 34, synthetic NO, window 0x3c1,
root 0x122, subw 0x0, time 7391940, (-395,37), root:(703,841),
state 0x0, keycode 98 (keysym 0xff26, Katakana), same_screen YES,
XLookupString gives 0 bytes: 
XFilterEvent returns: False  

How can I fix?

I also note that I am not receiving e-mail from the list and have
appealed to RH admins to track the bounces for me to no avail but I will
monitor the archive for possible solutions if they aren't mailed
directly to me.

Thanks

Craig


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: F12: ssh change port number

2009-11-22 Thread Aaron Konstam
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 17:58 +, Soo-Hyun Choi wrote: 
> Hi,
> 
> I have been using Ubuntu for several years, but I've just installed
> F12 for a specific use. While using it, I have encountered an odd
> problem in changing the default SSH port number other than 22.
> 
> In Ubuntu (like other Unix-like systems), it was very straight forward
> to change the default SSH port number by modifying "Port 22" in
> "/etc/ssh/sshd_config". However, for some reasons, F12 didn't work
> like this way.
> 
> I have done a quick google on this subject, but didn't find any answer
> yet. Is there a F12-only specific way to change the default SSH port
> number to something else? Or, am I missing something?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
It must be changed on the sshd_config as well as the sswh_config. Did
you change both? In other words the sender and the server must agree on
the port.
--
===
Observe yon plumed biped fine. To activate its captivation, Deposit on
its termination, A quantity of particles saline.
===
Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: akons...@sbcglobal.net

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


f12 how can I fix my thrashed gnome panels

2009-11-22 Thread Skunk Worx

Hi,

I thrashed my gnome panel geometries-- some components are in bad 
locations or not working properly, etc.


I had my KVM on another machine while f12 booted, then I logged in at 
the wrong (low) resolution to restart runlevel 5 (1,5) and this thrashed 
them for high res. going forward. Reboot, etc. doesn't fix them.


Is there a way to regenerate the panels with the correct geometry or 
should I just rebuild my account from scratch?


Thanks,
John

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: how far from the arrive of evolution 2.28.1 for Fedora 12

2009-11-22 Thread L
2009/11/22 Christoph Höger :
> Am Sonntag, den 22.11.2009, 23:10 +1100 schrieb L:
>> Hi
>>
>> I am wonder how far from the arrival of evolution 2.28.1 in F12. One
>> of main reasons to upgrade to F12, for me,  is that F12 shipped with
>> evo 2.28. People from Unbuntu use evo-2.28 (in fact evo 2.28.1)   and
>> evo-mapi to connect to exchange 2007. Unfortunately, current evo
>> 2.28.0 can't connect to exchange 2007 (via evo-mapi). It crashes every
>> time.  Does any one know if F12 will upgrade evo 2.28.1 soon?
>>
>> best
>>
>> Y
>
> As you can see here:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=175
>
> It has already been build (so feel free to test manually), but since
> this is roughly one month old, I guess that somewhere along the gnome
> stack there must be some breakage that prevents an update - maybe you
> simply ask the maintainer or open a feature request to track the
> progress.

thanks. I tried to manually upgrade some packages, but failed, some
rpms depend on evolution-data-server-doc-2.28.1, this seems not
available.

Where to make request? this may be a simple solution

best

Y

>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>



-- 
http://etvillage.blogspot.com/

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Skype HOWTO for Fedora 12, 64-bit

2009-11-22 Thread Marko Vojinovic

Before anyone starts asking, this is what you need to do to make skype work on 
a 64-bit F12:

(1) Make sure that you have a working sound, pulseaudio and all.

(2) Download the latest skype rpm for Fedora, from skype website. At the 
moment, it is the "skype-2.1.0.47-fc10.i586.rpm" for Fedora 10.

(3) Do a yum install of the following:

glibc.i686
alsa-lib.i686
libXv.i686
libXScrnSaver.i686
qt.i686
qt-x11.i686
alsa-plugins-pulseaudio.i686 libv4l.i686

This will pull in cca 86 or so .i686 packages, mostly libraries.

(4) Go to a directory where you downloaded the skype rpm. Do a
"yum --nogpgcheck localinstall skype-2.1.0.47-fc10.i586.rpm".

(5) Start skype in a terminal. It should Just Work, using default devices for 
audio input and output (AFAICS, pulse will be chosen automatically). Test 
sound and test call should also work out-of-the-box. At least they did for 
me... If it Just Works, you don't need to start it from the terminal anymore.

If it doesn't Just Work, you will probably see a message in the terminal 
complaining about not finding "somelibrary.so" or similar. In that case:

(5a) Do a "yum whatprovides somelibrary.so". Yum should reply with 
"somepackage.i686" that provides that library.

(5b) Do a "yum install somepackage.i686", and restart skype.

(5c) Repeat (5a)-(5b) until skype stops complaining. But the packages from 
step (3) should cover mostly all dependencies.

That's it. This was tested and verified to work on a clean install of F12 from 
a 64-bit KDE Live CD, of course after a full "yum update". Anyone having 
positive/negative experience with other (non-KDE, non-clean-install) setups, 
feel free to share.

Enjoy! :-)

Best, :-)
Marko

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Problem with f12 setting PS1 at login.

2009-11-22 Thread Tom Diehl

Hi,

I have an F12 system that when I login it does not set PS1. I did a little
troubleshooting and I found that the PROMPT_COMMAND variable is indeed getting
set correctly by the login scripts but for some reason, the prompt does not get
set properly.

If I do ". $PROMPT_COMMAND" after I login, PS1 gets set correctly. Does anyone
have any ideas what I need to do to get this to work? I have not found anything
useful in Google.

The bash man page says this is supposed to work just like it has for as long as
I can remember. I use konsole on a gnome desktop if it matters.

Regards,

--
Tom Diehl   tdi...@rogueind.com  Spamtrap address mtd...@rogueind.com

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: F12: Won't start X? (was Re: Preup to F12, won't boot)

2009-11-22 Thread Bruce Korb
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:46 AM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930
 wrote:
>>   I found earlier threads describing a similar problem with F12 alpha
>> and beta, but found no solution.
>>
>>   Any advice?

If you have an NVidia graphics card, then wait.  It's not ready for
prime time yet.
Of course, neither is openSuSE and with my NVidia card (GEFORCE 9400 GT),
it is too new for Debian stable and Debian testing is, well, too raw.
So, I'm still
SOL and using flaky sound and video from an older release.  :(  Tiresome.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: F12 installs report here.

2009-11-22 Thread Marko Vojinovic

> Subject says it all.  Tell us about your experience.

Just installed Fedora 12 on Fujitsu-Siemens Esprimo U9200 laptop (2GB RAM). 
Clean install from x86-64 KDE Live CD, immediately followed by a yum update.

In short, everything works flawlessly! Many thanks to all Fedora devs!! :-)

Specifics:
- KDE is impressive and more powerful than ever
- Pulseaudio Just Works
- Intel graphics drivers Just Work --- no random freezing (GM965 chipset)
- 3D accelerated graphics Just Works (KDE, Compiz and all...)
- Wireless&NM Just Work
- ext4 filesystem Just Works (on all partitions, with GRUB, etc.)
- SELinux policy Just Works (no complaints so far)

The non-free specifics:
- 64-bit flash plugin Just Works, with pulseaudio and all
- mplayer Just Works (inside Compiz --- no picture jittering)
- and the BIGGEST SURPRISE:

  SKYPE JUST WORKS !!! :-D

Even more, it cooperates beautifully with pulseaudio, shares sound with other 
audio apps (XMMS, KDE notifications, etc..), and this is the very first time I 
can hear it ringing while listening to some music or watching a movie.

I just had a skype-phonecall with a friend of mine, while XMMS was playing 
some ambiental music in the background. I reduced its volume somewhat, 
courtesy of pulseaudio, in order to have a comfortable conversation over 
skype. And as my friend told me about some website to visit, I opened it in 
firefox and heard audio from some flash stuff on the web page. And everything 
coexisted without even a hiccup!

The only volume mixer I ever started in F12 was pavucontrol, and even that 
only to adjust the microphone level. I used app-native volume sliders in all 
audio apps, and it all also Just Worked. I could see the volume slider in 
pavucontrol moving in sync as I move the XMMS volume slider, and vice versa.

Ok, just to be fair, skype did require some nontrivial work to get installed, 
and I am about to post the detailed HOWTO in a new thread.

And there is just one thing I dislike --- in order to make skype happy, I had 
to taint my new and beautiful x86_64 system with a lot of ugly .i686 packages. 
Specifically, yum pulled in a total

[r...@yoda ~]# rpm -qa | grep .i686 | wc -l
86

of those, mostly various libs, on an otherwise crystal-clear 64-bit system.

Oh, yeah, there was also this thing with renaming LVDS and VGA outputs into 
LVDS1 and VGA1, which broke all my custom scripts involving xrandr, but that 
was easy to fix after I figured out that the syntax is now different. It did 
take 
some amount of head-scratching to figure it out, though... ;-)

All in all, F12 appears to be a fantastic release! THANKS EVERYBODY!!! And 
keep up the good work! :-)

Best, :-)
Marko

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: KVM Iptables On Boot

2009-11-22 Thread Nabeel
Thanks for the quick response I'll probably end up doing the same thing 
you did. 


Tom Horsley wrote:

On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:12:24 -0500
Nabeel wrote:

  
I'm currently using KVM and trying to figure out how to reload/edit the 
default KVM iptable rules.



Good luck with that :-). I don't know how to modify them, but I
can completely eradicate them via:

virsh net-destroy default
virsh net-undefine default

That gets rid of the default NAT scheme libvirt uses and I replace
it by creating a bridge and using bridged networking I setup
myself.

Possibly the key to merely modifying the rules lies somewhere
in the virsh net* family of commands?

Might find a better answer on the fedora-virt list.

  


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: F12: Won't start X? (was Re: Preup to F12, won't boot)

2009-11-22 Thread n2xssvv.g02gfr12930
On 21/11/09 02:20, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
>  Hello,
> 
>   Now I have almost the same problem on another computer. Except that
> I did not use preupgrate but upgrade via netinstal. The only thing I
> know the computers have in common is that they are both Dell and have
> flat screns. One is a desktop, the other a laptop.
> 
>   After it says "Welcome to Fedora", it prints a number of messages
> most of which just say it's starting something. Then it stops and the
> screen flickers for a few seconds. The last message is entirely
> different on both computers, so I am assuming it is not relevant.
> 
>   I don't have access to the desktop computer, but the laptop actually
> did boot, and I found out I can press Alt-F2 and then log in in text
> mode. After I logged in, it says:
> 
>   Can not open display "default display"
> 
>   I am assuming its the same with the desktop computer, but can not verify.
> 
>   I found earlier threads describing a similar problem with F12 alpha
> and beta, but found no solution.
> 
>   Any advice?
> 
>  Take care
>  Oliver
> 
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 9:36 AM, Oliver Ruebenacker  wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Gianluca Cecchi
>>  wrote:
>>> On  Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:51:05 -0500  Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
  If I edit away the "quiet" argument before booting, I see a few
 lines instead. The last of those few lines are (hand-copied, may
 contain typos):

 fb0: nouveaufb frame buffer device
>>>
>>> You ran preupgrade, and then reboot, but the actual upgrade phase has
>>> not happened yet, correct?
>>> Try to modify f12 upgrade kernel command line also adding at the end
>>> something like
>>>
>>> xdriver=vesa nomodeset
>>>
>>>
>>> and see if it goes better...
>>
>>  Thanks, I will try (that computer is at a location I am usually only
>> on Thursdays. Sicne next week is Thanksgiving, this means again in two
>> weeks).
>>
>>  What do you mean the upgrade has not happened yet? I am assuming it has.
>>
>>  I also figured out that if you remove "rhgb" and "quiet", there is
>> some text, and it goes as far as jexec starting avahi or something
>> like that, and then the screen flickers for a few seconds, and then it
>> stops and nothing more happens. Until I press the power button briefly
>> (pressing it longer would cut power) and then the system seems to shut
>> down orderly.
>>
>>  Before I get to the point where it stops, it says something like
>> welcome to Fedora, press "I" for interactive setup, but even if I hold
>> my finger on "i" (or shift and "i") all the time, it never becomes
>> interactive.
>>
>> Take care
>> Oliver
>>
>> --
>> Oliver Ruebenacker, Computational Cell Biologist
>> Systems Biology Linker at Virtual Cell (http://vcell.org/sybil)
>> Turning Knowledge Data into Models
>> Center for Cell Analysis and Modeling
>> http://www.oliver.curiousworld.org
>>
> 
> 
> 

Oliver,

I found I had to set up the /etc/X11/xorg.conf file with the files,
video card driver, screen, and monitor settings to get it to work
correctly with the nouveau drivers. Unfortunately the proprietary nvidia
drivers for Fedora 12 are still in testing, (they are buggy, I'm using
them, avoiding the bugs), so, for nvidia, you need to disable the Livna
display configuration from trying to reset to them. See below for an
example of what you might need.

Section "Files"
ModulePath   "/usr/lib64/xorg/modules"
EndSection

Section "Monitor"

# HorizSync source: edid, VertRefresh source: edid
Identifier   "Monitor0"
VendorName   "Unknown"
ModelName"whatever"
HorizSync30.0 - 80.0
VertRefresh  56.0 - 75.0
Option  "DPMS"
EndSection

Section "Device"
Identifier  "Device0"
Driver  "nouveau"
VendorName  "NVIDIA Corporation"
BoardName   "GeForce 9800 GT"
EndSection

Section "Screen"
Identifier "Screen0"
Device "Device0"
Monitor"Monitor0"
DefaultDepth 24
Option  "TwinView" "0"
SubSection "Display"
Depth 24
EndSubSection
EndSection


I hope this helps get you up and running

JB

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: F12: ssh change port number

2009-11-22 Thread Itamar Reis Peixoto
I think you will need to adjust selinux settings to allow sshd works
in another port.



On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Alessandro Boggiano  wrote:
>
> 2009/11/22 Soo-Hyun Choi 
>>
>> I have been using Ubuntu for several years, but I've just installed
>> F12 for a specific use. While using it, I have encountered an odd
>> problem in changing the default SSH port number other than 22.
>>
>> In Ubuntu (like other Unix-like systems), it was very straight forward
>> to change the default SSH port number by modifying "Port 22" in
>> "/etc/ssh/sshd_config". However, for some reasons, F12 didn't work
>> like this way.
>>
> The same in Fedora.
> Did you recall to restart the daemon sshd after changing the port number ?
> command  is "service sshd restart" (with root user)
>
> Regards
> Alessandro
>
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>



-- 


Itamar Reis Peixoto

e-mail/msn/google talk/sip: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br
skype: itamarjp
icq: 81053601
+55 11 4063 5033
+55 34 3221 8599

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: F12: ssh change port number

2009-11-22 Thread Alessandro Boggiano
2009/11/22 Soo-Hyun Choi 

>
> I have been using Ubuntu for several years, but I've just installed
> F12 for a specific use. While using it, I have encountered an odd
> problem in changing the default SSH port number other than 22.
>
> In Ubuntu (like other Unix-like systems), it was very straight forward
> to change the default SSH port number by modifying "Port 22" in
> "/etc/ssh/sshd_config". However, for some reasons, F12 didn't work
> like this way.
>
> The same in Fedora.
Did you recall to restart the daemon sshd after changing the port number ?
command  is "service sshd restart" (with root user)

Regards
Alessandro
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: F12: ssh change port number

2009-11-22 Thread Greg Maruszeczka
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:15:44 +
Soo-Hyun Choi  wrote:

> > I have F12 i686, i found this in sshd_config at line 13 (just
> > un-comment and change port number)
> >
> > #Port 22
> 
> Yes, what I am saying is it didn't work what it supposed to do by
> simply changing this value. That is if I change this value to an
> arbitrary high number (e.g., 10100), the ssh connection is not being
> made. (Yes, I did restart sshd by doing "sudo /etc/init.d/sshd
> restart" before trying logging in with the changed port number.
> 
> [...@foo ~] $ ssh -p 10100 mymachine
> ssh: connect to host mymachine port 10100: No route to host
> 
> Any idea?
> 


Ah, you didn't mention that your problem was *connecting* to the port;
your original question implied the problem was with *listening* on a
given port -- big difference.

`netstat -untap` will show you which port ssh is actually listening on.
Then, taking Athmane's advice on temporarily disabling your firewall
should help eliminate the possibilities...

HTH,

GM

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: F12: ssh change port number

2009-11-22 Thread Garry T. Williams
On Sunday 22 November 2009 13:15:44 Soo-Hyun Choi wrote:
> [...@foo ~] $ ssh -p 10100 mymachine
> ssh: connect to host mymachine port 10100: No route to host
>
> Any idea?

That error indicates you cannot get packets to the host.  The sshd is
presumably listening on that port but the client cannot reach the
host.  (If you get connection refused, it indicates an icorrect port
or no service listening.)

-- 
Garry T. Williams --- +1 678 656-4579

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: F12: ssh change port number

2009-11-22 Thread Soo-Hyun Choi
>
> i have changed that line to ;
>
> # nmap localhost
> Starting Nmap 5.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2009-11-22 19:10 CET
> Interesting ports on localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1):
> Not shown: 993 closed ports
> PORT STATE SERVICE
> 25/tcp   open  smtp
> 80/tcp   open  http
> 111/tcp  open  rpcbind
> 443/tcp  open  https
> 631/tcp  open  ipp
> /tcp open  unknown
> 3306/tcp open  mysql
>
> # ssh -p  localhost

> The authenticity of host '[localhost]: ([127.0.0.1]:)' can't
> be established.
> RSA key fingerprint is eb:e7:36:5f:a3:ba:81:eb:d4:6a:f9:18:f7:25:d6:16.
> Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)?
>
>
> so i thinks that you need to open this port from firewall (to
> iagnostic just disable it by: service iptables stop)

Hooray, yes, I have overlooked the iptables settings - I thought there
wasn't any firewall rules as it was just a fresh installation, but
there were! I have disabled the iptables, and everything is working
fine now.

Thanks,
Soo-Hyun


>
> HTH
>
>
>
> --
> Athmane Madjoudj

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: F12: ssh change port number

2009-11-22 Thread Greg Maruszeczka
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 17:58:17 +
Soo-Hyun Choi  wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> I have been using Ubuntu for several years, but I've just installed
> F12 for a specific use. While using it, I have encountered an odd
> problem in changing the default SSH port number other than 22.
> 
> In Ubuntu (like other Unix-like systems), it was very straight forward
> to change the default SSH port number by modifying "Port 22" in
> "/etc/ssh/sshd_config". However, for some reasons, F12 didn't work
> like this way.
> 
> I have done a quick google on this subject, but didn't find any answer
> yet. Is there a F12-only specific way to change the default SSH port
> number to something else? Or, am I missing something?
> 
> Thanks,
> 


Are you sure it isn't some simple oversight like forgetting to restart
the daemon? I ask because I just changed the listening port on my F12
install and it works as expected simply by changing the 'Port '
line in /etc/ssh/sshd_config.

HTH,

GM

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: F12: ssh change port number

2009-11-22 Thread Athmane Madjoudj
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Soo-Hyun Choi  wrote:
>> I have F12 i686, i found this in sshd_config at line 13 (just
>> un-comment and change port number)
>>
>> #Port 22
>
> Yes, what I am saying is it didn't work what it supposed to do by
> simply changing this value. That is if I change this value to an
> arbitrary high number (e.g., 10100), the ssh connection is not being
> made. (Yes, I did restart sshd by doing "sudo /etc/init.d/sshd
> restart" before trying logging in with the changed port number.
>
> [...@foo ~] $ ssh -p 10100 mymachine
> ssh: connect to host mymachine port 10100: No route to host
>
> Any idea?
>
>
>>
>> --
>> Athmane Madjoudj
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>

i have changed that line to ;

# nmap localhost
Starting Nmap 5.00 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2009-11-22 19:10 CET
Interesting ports on localhost.localdomain (127.0.0.1):
Not shown: 993 closed ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
25/tcp   open  smtp
80/tcp   open  http
111/tcp  open  rpcbind
443/tcp  open  https
631/tcp  open  ipp
/tcp open  unknown
3306/tcp open  mysql

# ssh -p  localhost

The authenticity of host '[localhost]: ([127.0.0.1]:)' can't
be established.
RSA key fingerprint is eb:e7:36:5f:a3:ba:81:eb:d4:6a:f9:18:f7:25:d6:16.
Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)?


so i thinks that you need to open this port from firewall (to
diagnostic just disable it by: service iptables stop)

HTH



-- 
Athmane Madjoudj

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: F12: ssh change port number

2009-11-22 Thread Mauriat Miranda
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Soo-Hyun Choi  wrote:

> Yes, what I am saying is it didn't work what it supposed to do by
> simply changing this value. That is if I change this value to an
> arbitrary high number (e.g., 10100), the ssh connection is not being
> made. (Yes, I did restart sshd by doing "sudo /etc/init.d/sshd
> restart" before trying logging in with the changed port number.
>
> [...@foo ~] $ ssh -p 10100 mymachine
> ssh: connect to host mymachine port 10100: No route to host
>
> Any idea?
>

Firewall ?


-- 
Mauriat Miranda
http://www.mjmwired.net/linux

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: F12: ssh change port number

2009-11-22 Thread Soo-Hyun Choi
> I have F12 i686, i found this in sshd_config at line 13 (just
> un-comment and change port number)
>
> #Port 22

Yes, what I am saying is it didn't work what it supposed to do by
simply changing this value. That is if I change this value to an
arbitrary high number (e.g., 10100), the ssh connection is not being
made. (Yes, I did restart sshd by doing "sudo /etc/init.d/sshd
restart" before trying logging in with the changed port number.

[...@foo ~] $ ssh -p 10100 mymachine
ssh: connect to host mymachine port 10100: No route to host

Any idea?


>
> --
> Athmane Madjoudj

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: F12: ssh change port number

2009-11-22 Thread Athmane Madjoudj
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 6:58 PM, Soo-Hyun Choi  wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been using Ubuntu for several years, but I've just installed
> F12 for a specific use. While using it, I have encountered an odd
> problem in changing the default SSH port number other than 22.
>
> In Ubuntu (like other Unix-like systems), it was very straight forward
> to change the default SSH port number by modifying "Port 22" in
> "/etc/ssh/sshd_config". However, for some reasons, F12 didn't work
> like this way.
>
> I have done a quick google on this subject, but didn't find any answer
> yet. Is there a F12-only specific way to change the default SSH port
> number to something else? Or, am I missing something?
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list@redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
> Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>

I have F12 i686, i found this in sshd_config at line 13 (just
un-comment and change port number)

#Port 22

-- 
Athmane Madjoudj

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: sound card configuration

2009-11-22 Thread François Patte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Le 22/11/2009 17:49, stan a écrit :
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:07:57 +0100
> François Patte  wrote:
> 
>> Is there a tutorial to configure a sound card under fedora 10?
> 
> I'm not aware of one, though that doesn't mean there isn't one.
> 
>> My sound card (Realtek ALC 882 integrated on Asus P5WD2 mobo) is
>> working but the sound is not clear: a lot of interferences (b,
>> criccroc...), so, in piano passages of record, I can ear more
>> electronic sounds than music
>>
>> Is there a way to have no background noise?
> 
> If the noise isn't there in the original recording, it is probably
> coming from processing *after* the sound card. 

Thanks for answering. I am not able to  answer all your questions, I'll
try my best.

> Are you changing the
> frame rate on the sound?

No. I just play sound from CD (or DVD) or from the HD if I have ripped a
 record. I listen to internet streams too (radio).

>  On the fly resampling can lead to artifacts
> such as you describe.
> 
> The sound card does the best it can under all circumstances given the
> input and output.  There really isn't any configuration unless you are
> using the wrong driver.

I did not install any driver, the sound card was working out of the box
after install.

How can check this point? And, if necessary, where can I find the good
driver?

> 
> If this doesn't give you enough hints to solve the problem, you will
> need to post more information.
> 
> What is the source of the music?

As I told: CD, DVD, HD, streams

> 
> How does it get to the sound card?

This, I don't understand/know. pulseaudio is working. I am a member of
pulse-rt group.


> 
> What program are you using to record?

I don't record anything.

> 
> Is pulseaudio running?  Have you configured it with pavucontrol?

I don't understand how to configure anything with this: I can only
modify a level, but how can I know what is the good level?

> 
> Are frame rates consistent throughout?

I don't understand this question!

Thanks for helping.

- --
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Université Paris Descartes
45, rue des Saints Pères
F-75270 Paris Cedex 06
Tél. +33 (0)1 4286 2145
http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAksJe+AACgkQdE6C2dhV2JXlJgCfWG0rYTNN2I+UAZY9SlLgOqYi
ZrUAoJBEVoEq9UfrZ6auIaivbMmFl6xe
=mzrN
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


F12: ssh change port number

2009-11-22 Thread Soo-Hyun Choi
Hi,

I have been using Ubuntu for several years, but I've just installed
F12 for a specific use. While using it, I have encountered an odd
problem in changing the default SSH port number other than 22.

In Ubuntu (like other Unix-like systems), it was very straight forward
to change the default SSH port number by modifying "Port 22" in
"/etc/ssh/sshd_config". However, for some reasons, F12 didn't work
like this way.

I have done a quick google on this subject, but didn't find any answer
yet. Is there a F12-only specific way to change the default SSH port
number to something else? Or, am I missing something?

Thanks,

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: F12 upgrade needs more space for /mnt/sysimage/boot

2009-11-22 Thread Beartooth
On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:36:25 -0200, Germán Racca wrote:
[]
> I did the following. Before starting with preupgrade, I removed all but
> the last F11 kernel (this to save space on /boot). But nevertheless,
> after reboot it said that it needed 0MB of space. Here I did what
> someone said in a post some minutes earlier: I moved
> System-map-{kernel-version}, config-{kernel-version} and the efi
> directory onto / to free more space on /boot and then tried again. This
> time it completed the upgrade successfully.

I did all those things, on three PCs and a laptop, with no joy; 
noticed that a packagekit update updated preupgrade; tried again; still 
no joy.

On some machines, if I'm quick enough, I can make it try the 
install, whereupon it launches anaconda -- but still fails with the same 
old space complaint. (If I'm quick enough: timeout in grub.conf is set to 
25 seconds; but it disregards that, and barely flashes.)

-- 
Beartooth Staffwright, Neo-Redneck Not Quite Clueless Power User
I have precious (very precious!) little idea where up is.


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: NVIDIA under F12

2009-11-22 Thread Matthew Saltzman
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 17:43 +0100, Luc MAIGNAN wrote: 
> Hi,
> 
> I try to compile latest nvidia drivers for a GEFORCE 8600 GTS under F12, 
> but it doesn't work and the log isn't very verbose.
> 
> Has anyone succeed to do this ?

Have you tried the ones on RPMfusion's updates-testing repo?

> 
> BR
> 
> 
-- 
Matthew Saltzman

Clemson University Math Sciences
mjs AT clemson DOT edu
http://www.math.clemson.edu/~mjs

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: KVM Iptables On Boot

2009-11-22 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 11/22/2009 10:12 AM, Nabeel wrote:
> Where/How can I modify the
> default kvm/libvirt rules?

These rules are created by libvirtd when it sets up its virtual
network(s).  If you want to use libvirt-managed networks, I think you're
stuck with this behavior.  You do have the option, however of disabling
all libvirt-managed virtual networks and setting everything up manually.

-- 

Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: sound card configuration

2009-11-22 Thread stan
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:07:57 +0100
François Patte  wrote:

> Is there a tutorial to configure a sound card under fedora 10?

I'm not aware of one, though that doesn't mean there isn't one.

> 
> My sound card (Realtek ALC 882 integrated on Asus P5WD2 mobo) is
> working but the sound is not clear: a lot of interferences (b,
> criccroc...), so, in piano passages of record, I can ear more
> electronic sounds than music
> 
> Is there a way to have no background noise?

If the noise isn't there in the original recording, it is probably
coming from processing *after* the sound card.  Are you changing the
frame rate on the sound?  On the fly resampling can lead to artifacts
such as you describe.

The sound card does the best it can under all circumstances given the
input and output.  There really isn't any configuration unless you are
using the wrong driver.

If this doesn't give you enough hints to solve the problem, you will
need to post more information.

What is the source of the music?

How does it get to the sound card?

What program are you using to record?

Is pulseaudio running?  Have you configured it with pavucontrol?

Are frame rates consistent throughout?

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


NVIDIA under F12

2009-11-22 Thread Luc MAIGNAN

Hi,

I try to compile latest nvidia drivers for a GEFORCE 8600 GTS under F12, 
but it doesn't work and the log isn't very verbose.


Has anyone succeed to do this ?

BR

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


BackupPC: How much should be setup by package?

2009-11-22 Thread Richard Shaw
I recently installed F12 and after decided to resetup BackupPC instead
of just restoring my settings from F11 (in case any important changes
were made). After fixing some selinux issues I was able to login to
the cgi interface but I could only get the summary page, not the admin
options. After several hours of searching without finding anything
useful I finally caught a break[1] buried near the bottom of the
documentation. One could argue that it probably should be a little
more in your face. Also, none of the wiki's or howto's that I found
mentioned this step. Of course now that I know to add "CgiAdminUsers"
to my search I can find a few, but hindsight is 20-20.

A few questions:
1. Should an admin user be defaulted, or is the expectation that
everyone should know this?
2. If it is not proper to have this defaulted, where should some
fedora specific documentation go?
3. The default apache configuration for BackupPC only allows
connections from 127.0.0.1. Shouldn't localhost also be defaulted?


[1] http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/faq/BackupPC.html#item__conf_cgiadminusers_

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: KVM Iptables On Boot

2009-11-22 Thread Tom Horsley
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 11:12:24 -0500
Nabeel wrote:

> I'm currently using KVM and trying to figure out how to reload/edit the 
> default KVM iptable rules.

Good luck with that :-). I don't know how to modify them, but I
can completely eradicate them via:

virsh net-destroy default
virsh net-undefine default

That gets rid of the default NAT scheme libvirt uses and I replace
it by creating a bridge and using bridged networking I setup
myself.

Possibly the key to merely modifying the rules lies somewhere
in the virsh net* family of commands?

Might find a better answer on the fedora-virt list.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


KVM Iptables On Boot

2009-11-22 Thread Nabeel
I'm currently using KVM and trying to figure out how to reload/edit the 
default KVM iptable rules. I understand that I can save them 
(iptables-save) in the /etc/sysconfig/iptables and simply reload it 
rather than having to reboot each time. Where/How can I modify the 
default kvm/libvirt rules? Everything in /var/lib/libvirt/iptables and 
/etc/sysconfig/iptables is empty. The one I am most interested in 
customizing is the last two lines below.


-A INPUT -i virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i virbr0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 53 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i virbr0 -p udp -m udp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -i virbr0 -p tcp -m tcp --dport 67 -j ACCEPT
-A INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 22 -j fail2ban-SSH
-A FORWARD -d 192.168.122.0/24 -o virbr0 -m state --state 
RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT

-A FORWARD -s 192.168.122.0/24 -i virbr0 -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -i virbr0 -o virbr0 -j ACCEPT
-A FORWARD -o virbr0 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable
-A FORWARD -i virbr0 -j REJECT --reject-with icmp-port-unreachable

-overkill

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: XV under x86_64

2009-11-22 Thread Mikkel
Reg Clemens wrote:
> I use XV for everyting, and it worked fine till I went to 64bit Fc11
> 
> Is there an rpm out there with a good 64bit xv in it?
> Currently the 32bit version cant find a needed library, even tho
> its in /usr/lib64 
Did you try the 64bit version from rpmfusion-nonfree? I know the one
for FC12 works fine.

Mikkel
-- 

  Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons,
for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup!



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Autofs under Fedora-12

2009-11-22 Thread Ed Greshko
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Is there a problem with autofs/automount under Fedora-12?
>
> I have exactly the same settings that I had in Fedora-11,
> but the mount command is not being completed at boot-time,
> although I have no problem giving it later by hand.
>
>   
I'm a bit confused about what command you're giving later.

I've used autofs before and don't recall any commands to get it to
work.  The automount command modifies the auto.master file and the file
system would get mounted when the directory is accessed.  

Could it be that you don't have the autofs service starting at boot
time?  chkconfig --list autofs

-- 
Satan did it Guess Who! http://tinyurl.com/mc4xe7



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Autofs under Fedora-12

2009-11-22 Thread Timothy Murphy
Is there a problem with autofs/automount under Fedora-12?

I have exactly the same settings that I had in Fedora-11,
but the mount command is not being completed at boot-time,
although I have no problem giving it later by hand.

-- 
Timothy Murphy  
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Fedora 12 sha1sum

2009-11-22 Thread Todd Zullinger
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
> Woudld it be possible to do the signature using SHA256 also?  On one
> of the iso's I recently burned did have a checksum file with a gpg
> SHA256 signature hash.  That was enough to remind me that I should
> be using the SHA256 for checksumming the iso.

Yes, that is generally a goal.  The F-11 *-CHECKSUM files were signed
using a SHA-256 hash.  One unfortunate effect of moving to the Sigul
signing server for F-12 is that controlling the hash used for gpg
signatures is more difficult and resulted in the default SHA-1 being
used.

However, while using SHA-256 every where is the goal, it's still good
to make people aware that the GPG Hash: header and the checksum used
for the .iso are not related at all.  It seems that far too many
people make the mistaken assumption that they are. :/

-- 
ToddOpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~
The trouble with being punctual is that nobody's there to appreciate
it.
-- Franklin P. Jones



pgpQY0270a6nf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Fedora-12 from USB stick

2009-11-22 Thread Timothy Murphy
Timothy Murphy wrote:

> However, I find that when I add my old grub.conf entries for Fedora-11
> to my new grub.conf , I am unable to boot Fedora-11 .
> (I'm also unable to boot it if I run grub interactively.)
> The error I get is:
> fsck.ext4: unable to resolve UUID=66c3...699e .
> 
> I cannot work out what this UUID represents.
> It does not appear to be the old or the new / partition.
> I thought it might be the memory stick,
> but replacing this did not help.

To reply to myself, I found that the mystery UUID
actually refers to the partition which is the new / .
So installing Fedora-12 on this partition
changes its UUID, which I find slightly surprising -
I thought the whole point of these UUIDs
was that they never changed.

-- 
Timothy Murphy  
e-mail: gayleard /at/ eircom.net
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: logwatch?

2009-11-22 Thread Tim
On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 05:00 +, Andreas M. Kirchwitz wrote:
> It looks like a lot of people were complaining about such reports
> and asked to turn it off.

I'd be surprised if those sort of people even read the root mail, so I
wouldn't expect them to see, or even know about, a logwatch report.

-- 
[...@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.27.25-78.2.56.fc9.i686

Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored.  I
read messages from the public lists.



-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Mostly successful with f12

2009-11-22 Thread Tom Horsley
Got everything re-installed from scratch (I like to take
the opportunity to clean stuff up every 6 months rather than
trying to upgrade :-). My first backup successfully rsynced
my new installation to a USB drive in cron last night,
I can VPN to work with pptp and run NX sessions,
so things seem to be working well.

The only really weird bug I found is this one for gdb:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=539590

(I'm convinced that somewhere in Ulrich Drepper's
basement, possibly guarded by a 3 headed dog, is a
copy of the secret linux cabal's design document which
states the primary design goal for linux is to make
life a living hell for people who work on debuggers :-).

There was also this:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531370

but a "yum install foomatic" gets that printer working.

And this is fixed:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524428

but hasn't yet made it to stable repo, so I have to
install xorg-x11-drv-evdev from updates-testing to get
my drag lock setting to work.

I gave in and started using pulseaudio (mainly because
I now have a separate sound card for doing spdif output
to my sound system which I turn off in pulse and dedicate
to mplayer), so I had to start the pulse daemon in my
custom .xsession. Finding the /etc/xdg/autostart/ directory
was useful for determining the command to run. I also now
am forced to start /usr/libexec/polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1
or none of the little tools that want to become root can
ask how to do that (considering the 200 or so kernel daemons
and system services that typically start, and the 30 or 40
gnome daemons that run all the time before any actual user
applications get going, I wonder how long it will be before
the first linux server runs out of PIDs - there are only 32K
of them, and at the rate the gnome developers are following
the philosophy of "Why call a subroutine when I can send
dbus messages to a separate daemon instead?" it might
come sooner than anyone expects :-).

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Amazon MP3 Downloader

2009-11-22 Thread Andy Campbell
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:34:11 +0100, ELMORABITY Mohamed wrote:

> Le samedi 21 novembre 2009 à 16:25 -0600, Chris a écrit :
>> So it seems. Agreed as to boost. I read somewhere that an app called
>> Clamz might be worth considering. Perhaps sometime soon I shall.
> 
> Clamz seems to be a good alternative, although there is no GUI. By the
> way, it is in review for integration in Fedora:
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473184

I've been using clamz for a while - seems to work fine.  Except you need 
to apply a patch if you want to specify an absolute path in the output 
directory parameter (-d). 

Even lets you re-download an album for about 24hrs after you have bought 
it.

Andy

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


the minimal toolset for XML/docbook processing?

2009-11-22 Thread Robert P. J. Day

  these days, what's the most up-to-date set of packages that supports
rendering docbook into as many formats as possible -- html, xhtml,
pdf, ps, dvi, txt, and so on.

  specifically, i have no interest in packages related to SGML or
DSSSL or, if possible, jade.  if one could guarantee that one had only
current docbook5 input, what's a good collection of packages for this?
trivially, i'm looking at:

  * docbook-dtds
  * docbook5-schemas
  * docbook5-style-xsl
  * libxslt, libxml2 (for xsltproc)
  * xmlto
  * fop (for PDF generation)

beyond that, what else should be part of the collection?  i know of
other packages like docbook-utils and docbook-utils-pdf, but as i read
it, those involve pulling in jade, and it's not clear that that's
necessary once you have all of the above.  or is it?

  is there a wiki page on all this somewhere, or am i going to have to
write one?  :-)

rday
--


Robert P. J. Day   Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:  http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:   http://twitter.com/rpjday


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: flash player in F11

2009-11-22 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009, Amadeus W.M. wrote:

> ... but that seems to point to a 32-bit flash version. Where can I
> find an up- to-date download page for the 64-bit flash plugin?

http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/64bit.html

rday
--

Robert P. J. Day   Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:  http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:   http://twitter.com/rpjday


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


lost superblock

2009-11-22 Thread Neal Becker
I just updated f11->f12.  After, I followed instructions to convert root 
partition from ext3->ext4.  I used superrescuecd to do it, so filesystem was 
not mounted.

Rebooted into f12 and everything seemed fine.  I also was trying out nouveau 
instead of nvidia, which was OK until I tried to play an hd video.  The 
machine became so unresponsive (seemed to be swapping continuously) that I 
finally had to use the power switch to shut it off (this is a laptop).

On power up, the superblock was corrupted.  I tried fsck, but after trying 
to repair it screwed up beyond all hope, and I had to reinstall.

So, what in the world could have happened?

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: flash player in F11

2009-11-22 Thread Amadeus W.M.

On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:15:01 -0800, Greg Maruszeczka wrote:

> On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:05:43 + (UTC) "Amadeus W.M."
>  wrote:
> 
>> I have been happily using 64 bit flash player on a 64 bit F11 and
>> suddenly, after today's updates it simply disappeared. Firefox doesn't
>> think it has flash installed. But it's there, of course. What happened?
>> Anyone having this problem?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> How did you 'install' it?
> 
> I had the .so in /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins but discovered that the latest
> FF seems to look in /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins instead. Symlinking it to
> that folder did the trick in my case. Maybe this will help you as
> well...
> 
> HTH,
> 
> GM


That did it. I put the 64-bit libflashplayer.so in 
/usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins and it worked. 

Thank you very much. 


Something that worries me is that I got the 64-bit libflashplayer.so from 
here 

http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashplayer10/libfl
ashplayer-10.0.22.87.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz

back when I installed F11. Now that link seems dead. I keep the tar.gz 
file around so I can reuse it but that's not the permanent solution. Is 
there a standard location for downloading the 64-bit libflashplayer.so ? 

After the few google hits on 64 bit flash I arrived at this link:

http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html

but that seems to point to a 32-bit flash version. Where can I find an up-
to-date download page for the 64-bit flash plugin? 

Thanks!






-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: how far from the arrive of evolution 2.28.1 for Fedora 12

2009-11-22 Thread Christoph Höger
Am Sonntag, den 22.11.2009, 23:10 +1100 schrieb L:
> Hi
> 
> I am wonder how far from the arrival of evolution 2.28.1 in F12. One
> of main reasons to upgrade to F12, for me,  is that F12 shipped with
> evo 2.28. People from Unbuntu use evo-2.28 (in fact evo 2.28.1)   and
> evo-mapi to connect to exchange 2007. Unfortunately, current evo
> 2.28.0 can't connect to exchange 2007 (via evo-mapi). It crashes every
> time.  Does any one know if F12 will upgrade evo 2.28.1 soon?
> 
> best
> 
> Y

As you can see here:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=175

It has already been build (so feel free to test manually), but since
this is roughly one month old, I guess that somewhere along the gnome
stack there must be some breakage that prevents an update - maybe you
simply ask the maintainer or open a feature request to track the
progress.


signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Preup to F12, won't boot

2009-11-22 Thread Oliver Ruebenacker
 Hello,

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Gordon Messmer  wrote:
> On 11/19/2009 10:51 AM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:
>>
>>   I just preupgraded from F10 to F12, and booting goes as far as the
>> Fedora logo (circle with lower tip) filling up with white, then
>> flashing briefly. Then the screen goes and stays blank afterwards,
>> except for a cursor, and it displays if I type somthing.
>>
>
> Try to get /var/log/Xorg.0.log and send that to the list.  It will probably
> clarify why you aren't getting a login.
>
> You might also try "nomodeset" as a boot option in GRUB.

  Thanks, I already sent it in the thread "Re: F12 - no gui -
nvidia/nouveau", came to the conclusion that it is probably this bug:

  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=538578

  and solve it by removing the xorg.conf file.

 Take care
 Oliver

-- 
Oliver Ruebenacker, Computational Cell Biologist
Systems Biology Linker at Virtual Cell (http://vcell.org/sybil)
Turning Knowledge Data into Models
Center for Cell Analysis and Modeling
http://www.oliver.curiousworld.org

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


how far from the arrive of evolution 2.28.1 for Fedora 12

2009-11-22 Thread L
Hi

I am wonder how far from the arrival of evolution 2.28.1 in F12. One
of main reasons to upgrade to F12, for me,  is that F12 shipped with
evo 2.28. People from Unbuntu use evo-2.28 (in fact evo 2.28.1)   and
evo-mapi to connect to exchange 2007. Unfortunately, current evo
2.28.0 can't connect to exchange 2007 (via evo-mapi). It crashes every
time.  Does any one know if F12 will upgrade evo 2.28.1 soon?

best

Y


-- 
http://etvillage.blogspot.com/

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: XV under x86_64

2009-11-22 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:18:49 -0700, Reg wrote:

> 
> I use XV for everyting, and it worked fine till I went to 64bit Fc11
> 
> Is there an rpm out there with a good 64bit xv in it?
> Currently the 32bit version cant find a needed library, even tho
> its in /usr/lib64 

The 32-bit build won't search in /usr/lib64, which is a directory
for 64-bit libraries.

Perhaps you can post some details? What you describe sounds unusual
as library requirements are covered by RPM package depencencies.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: [Fedora-music-list] Tester needed for Audacious

2009-11-22 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 05:20:29 -0500, Orcan wrote:

> My tests, with a few mpc files that I have, gave positive results on
> F-12 x86_64. No issues.

Thanks for the test.   Basically, the worst that could have happened
is that the plugin failed to play anything on x86_64 _actually_ while it
simply refuses to fail on i686. ;)

> You can push them to testing if you have not
> done so already.

Yes, this has been done meanwhile including a few more patches for
unrelated issues.

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


F12: Mobile broadband dongle problem

2009-11-22 Thread Michael McConnell

Hi,

I have a Huawei E220 mobile broadband dongle on 3UK. In Fedora 10 this 
worked beautifully.  However, having upgraded to F12, I get the 
following in the log when I try to connect:


Nov 22 10:45:57 Sonozaki NetworkManager:   Activation (ttyUSB0) 
starting connection '3 Internet'
Nov 22 10:45:57 Sonozaki NetworkManager:   (ttyUSB0): device state 
change: 3 -> 4 (reason 0)
Nov 22 10:45:57 Sonozaki NetworkManager:   Activation (ttyUSB0) 
Stage 1 of 5 (Device Prepare) scheduled...
Nov 22 10:45:57 Sonozaki NetworkManager:   Activation (ttyUSB0) 
Stage 1 of 5 (Device Prepare) started...
Nov 22 10:45:57 Sonozaki NetworkManager:   Activation (ttyUSB0) 
Stage 1 of 5 (Device Prepare) complete.

Nov 22 10:45:57 Sonozaki modem-manager: (ttyUSB0) opening serial device...
Nov 22 10:46:58 Sonozaki NetworkManager:   stage1_prepare_done(): 
GSM modem connection failed: Network timeout
Nov 22 10:46:58 Sonozaki NetworkManager:   (ttyUSB0): device state 
change: 4 -> 9 (reason 1)
Nov 22 10:46:58 Sonozaki NetworkManager:   Marking connection '3 
Internet' invalid.
Nov 22 10:46:58 Sonozaki NetworkManager:   Activation (ttyUSB0) 
failed.
Nov 22 10:46:58 Sonozaki NetworkManager:   (ttyUSB0): device state 
change: 9 -> 3 (reason 0)
Nov 22 10:46:58 Sonozaki NetworkManager:   (ttyUSB0): deactivating 
device (reason: 0).
Nov 22 10:46:58 Sonozaki NetworkManager: flush_routes: assertion 
`iface_idx >= 0' failed
Nov 22 10:46:58 Sonozaki NetworkManager: flush_addresses: assertion 
`iface_idx >= 0' failed

Nov 22 10:46:58 Sonozaki modem-manager: (ttyUSB0) closing serial device...

However, I can point Minicom at /dev/ttyUSB0 and I can get the expected 
results by throwing AT commands at the unit, e.g:

ATI
Manufacturer: huawei
Model: E220
Revision: 11.117.09.04.00
IMEI: [hidden]
+GCAP: +CGSM,+DS,+ES

OK

(I hid the IMEI.)

Any suggestions (short of going the old-fashioned route and writing my 
own dial-scripts)?


--
-- Michael "Soruk" McConnell
   Eridani Star System

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Preup to F12, won't boot

2009-11-22 Thread Gordon Messmer

On 11/19/2009 10:51 AM, Oliver Ruebenacker wrote:

   I just preupgraded from F10 to F12, and booting goes as far as the
Fedora logo (circle with lower tip) filling up with white, then
flashing briefly. Then the screen goes and stays blank afterwards,
except for a cursor, and it displays if I type somthing.
   


Try to get /var/log/Xorg.0.log and send that to the list.  It will 
probably clarify why you aren't getting a login.


You might also try "nomodeset" as a boot option in GRUB.

--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: F12 installs report here.

2009-11-22 Thread Gordon Messmer

Dell Inspiron 531S:
Installed 64-bit, everything I've tested works perfectly.

Dell Latitude E6400:
Installed 64-bit, everything I've tested works perfectly.

Dell Inspiron 546:
+Airlink 101 wireless PCI card
Installed 64-bit, everything I've tested works perfectly.
(Side note: it took me several hours to get the wireless card 
working in Windows 7)


Toshiba (forgot the model number):
I attempted an update of a friend's laptop Friday night and learned 
that the system crashes unless I use "nomodeset" as a kernel option.  
The Intel i915 driver is the offending code.  I gathered some 
information and filed a bugzilla report, but haven't updated the laptop 
yet.  I did boot the LiveCD with "nomodeset" and everything else seemed 
fine.


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


assertion in NetworkManager

2009-11-22 Thread Philipp Böhm

Hello @all,

after upgrading to Fedora 12 I get some problems with NetworkManager for 
example Wireless Networks were disabled and you couldn't avtivate this. 
Some entries in /var/log/messages shows me an assertion in 
NetworkManager. I will post these line and I hope that somebody can help 
me. My wireless-device is an Atheros AR242x 802.11abg Wireless PCI 
Express Adapter (wlan0).


/var/log/messages:

Nov 22 11:00:18 philipps-toshi NetworkManager:   Wireless now 
enabled by radio killswitch

Nov 22 11:00:18 philipps-toshi rpc.statd[1270]: Version 1.2.1 Starting
Nov 22 11:00:19 philipps-toshi NetworkManager:ifcfg-rh: parsing 
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-wlan0 ...
Nov 22 11:00:19 philipps-toshi NetworkManager:ifcfg-rh: error: 
Missing SSID
Nov 22 11:00:19 philipps-toshi NetworkManager:ifcfg-rh: parsing 
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 ...
Nov 22 11:00:19 philipps-toshi NetworkManager:ifcfg-rh: read 
connection 'System eth0'
Nov 22 11:00:19 philipps-toshi NetworkManager:ifcfg-rh: parsing 
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-lo ...
Nov 22 11:00:19 philipps-toshi NetworkManager:   (wlan0): driver 
supports SSID scans (scan_capa 0x01).
Nov 22 11:00:19 philipps-toshi NetworkManager:   (wlan0): new 
802.11 WiFi device (driver: 'ath5k')
Nov 22 11:00:19 philipps-toshi NetworkManager:   (wlan0): exported 
as /org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/0

Nov 22 11:00:19 philipps-toshi NetworkManager:   (wlan0): now managed
Nov 22 11:00:19 philipps-toshi NetworkManager:   (wlan0): device 
state change: 1 -> 2 (reason 2)
Nov 22 11:00:19 philipps-toshi NetworkManager:   (wlan0): bringing 
up device.
Nov 22 11:00:19 philipps-toshi kernel: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link 
is not ready
Nov 22 11:00:19 philipps-toshi NetworkManager:   (wlan0): 
preparing device.
Nov 22 11:00:19 philipps-toshi NetworkManager:   (wlan0): 
deactivating device (reason: 2).
Nov 22 11:00:19 philipps-toshi NetworkManager: 
supplicant_interface_acquire: assertion `mgr_state == 
NM_SUPPLICANT_MANAGER_STATE_IDLE' failed


--
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: XV under x86_64

2009-11-22 Thread John Austin
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 21:18 -0700, Reg Clemens wrote:
> I use XV for everyting, and it worked fine till I went to 64bit Fc11
> 
> Is there an rpm out there with a good 64bit xv in it?
> Currently the 32bit version cant find a needed library, even tho
> its in /usr/lib64 
> -- 
> Reg.Clemens
> r...@dwf.com
> 
> 
For F11 I see
yum install xv
xv  x86_64 3.10a.jumbopatch.20070520-10.fc11 rpmfusion-nonfree-updates

but I think I compiled the version I'm using on F11


Just installed the following for F12
xv-3.10a.jumbopatch.20070520-10.fc12.x86_64

John


-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


sound card configuration

2009-11-22 Thread François Patte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Bonjour,

Is there a tutorial to configure a sound card under fedora 10?

My sound card (Realtek ALC 882 integrated on Asus P5WD2 mobo) is working
but the sound is not clear: a lot of interferences (b, criccroc...),
so, in piano passages of record, I can ear more electronic sounds than
music

Is there a way to have no background noise?

Thanks.

- --
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Université Paris Descartes
45, rue des Saints Pères
F-75270 Paris Cedex 06
Tél. +33 (0)1 4286 2145
http://www.math-info.univ-paris5.fr/~patte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAksJDXwACgkQdE6C2dhV2JW94gCgyAFy5XO4KrRhoTkB7XImaAwS
xAQAnicUYZ2BlTIc2L8Sw97nAHHIcY3V
=4ONd
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines


Re: Screenshot Tutorial: How to D-I-Y your own Google Chrome OS with Xen-based Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala amd64 Virtual Machine in Fedora 11 x86_64 Pv-Ops Dom0

2009-11-22 Thread Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)
*Google Chrome OS Download*

Filename: Google-Chrome-OS-Build-enming.teo-22Nov2009-0704hrs.vmdk

Filesize: 697.38MB

Type: VMware VMDK image file

MD5 Checksum: 1aec57157dd2083b166e493c0e831a
67

Download link: http://www.zshare.net/download/68819648ff817281/



-- 
Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) Dip(Mechatronics) BEng(Hons)(Mechanical
Engineering)
Alma Maters:
(1) Singapore Polytechnic
(2) National University of Singapore
My Primary Blog: http://teo-en-ming-aka-zhang-enming.blogspot.com
My Secondary Blog: http://enmingteo.wordpress.com
My Youtube videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/enmingteo
Email: space.time.unive...@gmail.com
Mobile Phone (Starhub Prepaid): +65-8369-2618
Street: Bedok Reservoir Road
Country: Singapore
-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines

Re: Graphical video not working after yum upgrade from fedora 11 to fedora 12

2009-11-22 Thread David García Granda
Hi John,

> I had an up to date fedora 11 install that was working fine.  I followed the
> instructions on the wiki for doing a yum upgrade and everything seemed to go
> very well until I rebooted and things hung as the graphical interface (I use
> KDE) was to boot.  I am able to boot into single user mode and run level 3
> and things appear to be fine.  I just can not get the graphical display. Any
> help would be appreciated.

I had some minor issues with the open driver (aka nouveau) when
upgrading to Fedora 12 and in my investigations I found a couple of
interesting links for people using the proprietary one:

- Official howto from RPM Fusion: http://rpmfusion.org/Howto/nVidia
- Personal blog with similar problem (solved):
http://linuxsoftwareblog.com/blog/?p=232

HTH,

David

-- 
fedora-list mailing list
fedora-list@redhat.com
To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines