qstat conflicts
Hello. Does Fedora dead? I have submit new qstat packages and filed bugs against applications which are using its [qstat] old binary name. There were several weeks when qstat update on hold due to bug #533777 Should we obsolete blocking pacakge(s)? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: 190 packages with .la file(s)
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Pierre-Yves pin...@pingoured.fr wrote: Looking at: $ yum whatprovides *.la |grep x86_64 |wc -l 190 surprises me a bit. Do we have 189 bugs waiting to be filled ? (I filled one this morning) I guess some of these cannot be changed but I guess some can. It's better to do _source_ package list which is probably twice smaller. And exclude kde3 stuff (as far as I remember the plug-in engine in KDE3 is based on those la-files). -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: jack2
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 11:23 PM, Orcan Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com wrote: My proposal is to use alternatives for parallel installation, the way java does. Then the user can switch between jack1 and jack2 as he wants. Is it okay with everyone if I write a specfile for jack2 that uses alternatives? It's ok for me. I can submit review for jack2. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
Re: qstat conflicts
I renamed binary in the Rawhide's package and filled bug against xqf. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
