Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 oleksandr korneta wrote: > on 07/25/2009 11:46 AM Chuck Anderson wrote: > >> >> I don't even upgrade anymore. I just keep two partitions (Logical >> Volumes actually)--one for Fedora N and one for Fedora N+1. >> > > interesting idea. Do you keep the same home for both? > > I don't do upgrades either, since the time rh9 to fc1 didn't work for > me. But I dont complain, kind of got used to the idea that fedora is not > made for upgrades. However, fresh install every time takes too much time > for deploying all the old tweaked configs and stuff... so I switch > between versions just once a year, from f N to f n+2, keeping two > consequent version of fedora on two different machines. Since it seems everyone else is posting their setups, why not. I have two machines, one leading (L) and the other "dragging" behind (D). L jumps ship to rawhide soon after rawhide while D chugs along on current release updates and cherry picks from updates-testing if necessary to fix things. D is usually used via VNC. All of the actual work is done on D and testing new stuff on L. So I just keep a full /home on D and a bare one on L. - --Ben -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkpsWgMACgkQiPi+MRHG3qTuvACfdPtoYss+Lj7a5L60Mai2mr81 68AAoJon/RWXaqQhieuQomo1Y7rRC5Bi =6tyw -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: fedora 11 worst then ever release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Farkas Levente wrote: > On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Alan Cox wrote: > >> "all of my system has a wrong openssl version" >> >> all these symptoms sound like your upgrade went horribly wrong. I've seen >> preupgrade mash up a box by half upgrading like that. It's the main reason >> I don't think preupgrade is actually safe to use yet. >> > > i use fedora install dvd in this case! if it's do a half upgrade then it's > also the bug of the installer. > > >> "i already install f11 yum show 2069 packages to update!!! just one month >> after the release! my system consist of 2059" >> >> In other words your box didn't update to F11 in the first place, it just >> updated a few things and exploded, which is what it tends to do. You were >> basically running FC10 and a few random bits of FC11. > > > as i wrote i use fedora install dvd! if it's jusr updated a few things then > it's also the bug of the installer. This is a problem with the DVD that is hard to solve. Fully updated F10 is newer than F11 was when the DVD was spun (especially when the DVD is a month old)...so not everything got updated. There was a thread on it earlier on this list. It either breaks other things to fix or the DVD is just broken to update from after X days of release. - --Ben -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkprMWcACgkQiPi+MRHG3qSo9wCeKF/Z1J/22CmNcwhmTXeJbsGO uMoAnAo/31bw/t5ptZspMBJeWT8QKyO4 =1TBQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
