RE: Disabling bapp1 for a bit
All of MirrorManager's cronjobs like update-master-directory-list and the crawlers run on bapp1. So getting it back online somewhere would be valuable to me. Thanks, Matt -Original Message- From: fedora-infrastructure-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-infrastructure-list-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Mike McGrath Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 8:05 PM To: Fedora Infrastructure List Subject: Disabling bapp1 for a bit I'm disabling bapp1 for a bit until I either build another one or until we get xen13 back online. This won't have a major impact on the users except that some sites won't have up to date data if they are updated (like docs.fedoraproject.org) Atm xen13 doesn't pass a POST so I'll be on the phone with IBM shortly. -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
RE: [off-topic] Help requested:Query on dual/quad port NIC
Dell sells one or more such cards. -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux -Original Message- From: fedora-infrastructure-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-infrastructure-list-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of susmit shannigrahi Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2009 8:38 AM To: Fedora Infrastructure Subject: [off-topic] Help requested:Query on dual/quad port NIC Hi, Can someone please help me with this? This person is looking for an PCI-based quad-port NIC which will work on Fedora/CentOS. Thanks. -- Forwarded message -- From: Indranil Das Gupta indr...@gmail.com Date: Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:01 PM Subject: Query on dual/quad port NIC Susmit, I'm looking for a PCI-based dual (preferably) quad-port NIC. The card needs to work (preferably with all 4 ports functioning) on Fedora/CentOS (Linux kernel 2.6.26 and upward (i386 arch)) thanks -idg -- Regards, Susmit. = http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/user:susmit = ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
RE: change freeze ends tomorrow
I need to get a new MM release out, that rolls up a pile of hotfixes currently in place. If someone has a good way to handle updating a SQLObject schema between two versions of a package (e.g. in upgrading from MM 1.2 to 1.3, I need to update the tables in the database), please talk to me. What I've got in MM now is horrible and often broken. -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux -Original Message- From: fedora-infrastructure-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-infrastructure-list-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Mike McGrath Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 2:27 PM To: Fedora Infrastructure List Subject: change freeze ends tomorrow Who's got stuff they want to implement over the next couple of days? -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
RE: [CHANGE REQUEST] Open freemedia form for October
Which is why I've become a fan of the $(someapp ...) nomenclature instead of backticks. -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux -Original Message- From: fedora-infrastructure-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-infrastructure-list-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of susmit shannigrahi Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 11:18 PM To: Fedora Infrastructure Subject: Re: [CHANGE REQUEST] Open freemedia form for October Not a big deal, but watch out for the backticks inside of single quotes :-) Spelling mistake. ;) Changing it to git commit -a -m 'opening freemedia form for the month of' `date +%B` Thanks. -- Regards, Susmit. = ssh 0x86DD170A http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/user:susmit = Sent from Calcutta, WB, India ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
FW: [Fedora Infrastructure] #1719: MM hotfix: crawler incorrectly creating dir entries for not up-to-date mirrors
Requesting +1s to apply this hotfix, which only affects the MM crawler. -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux -Original Message- From: Fedora Infrastructure [mailto:t...@fedorahosted.org] Sent: Mon 10/5/2009 10:38 AM To: mdom...@fedoraproject.org Cc: ri...@fedoraproject.org; n...@fedoraproject.org Subject: [Fedora Infrastructure] #1719: MM hotfix: crawler incorrectly creating dir entries for not up-to-date mirrors #1719: MM hotfix: crawler incorrectly creating dir entries for not up-to-date mirrors -+-- Reporter: mdomsch | Owner: mdomsch Type: bug | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 12 Component: Web Application | Version: Production Severity: Normal |Keywords: hotfix -+-- = phenomenon = nb reported that running report_mirror would report hundreds of directories deleted on each run. = reason = crawler is creating HostCategoryDir entries for not up-to-date directories (in fact, dirs that nb has excluded on his mirror). report_mirror then deletes these entries. = recommendation = commit 20986e503db481d4760e6e3ea74b07863a8e1cf9 Author: Matt Domsch m...@domsch.com Date: Sun Oct 4 22:25:15 2009 -0500 crawler: don't create HCDs for directories which aren't up2date diff --git a/server/crawler_perhost b/server/crawler_perhost index 9553fb8..8964c7e 100755 --- a/server/crawler_perhost +++ b/server/crawler_perhost @@ -303,6 +303,9 @@ def sync_hcds(host, host_category_dirs): if hcd.count() 0: hcd = hcd[0] else: +# don't create HCDs for directories which aren't up2date on the mirror +# chances are the mirror is excluding that directory +if not up2date: continue hcd = HostCategoryDir(host_category=hc, path=path, directory=d) if hcd.directory is None: -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1719 Fedora Infrastructure http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure Fedora Infrastructure Project for Bugs, feature requests and access to our source code. ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
RE: F8/F9 torrent links
When I last did cleanup, it was before F9 went EOL, so it stayed.F9 has ~20 downloaders right now. I didn't nuke F8 just because there were still a few seeders and downloaders. I see there are 12 downloaders at present for it. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-infrastructure-list/2009-May/msg00164.html describes the policy we have in place. By rights, if we move F9 to archive.fp.o, then we can nuke both F8 and F9 from torrent1. -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux -Original Message- From: sijis.avi...@gmail.com on behalf of Sijis Aviles Sent: Wed 8/26/2009 11:08 PM To: torrentadmin-memb...@fedoraproject.org Subject: F8/F9 torrent links Hey all, I was browsing the torrent.fedoraproject.org website and i noticed that there are torrent links still listed for F8 and F9. I was looking for a way to remove them via the fedora-web git repo but nb and G noticed the Torrent_SOP. I figured i'd email the torrent group and see if these should be removed since they are EOL. Let me know if in the future i should direct this to somewhere/someone else. Thanks, Sijis ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
RE: Infrastructure Introduction
Welcome back. Funny how life interferes with fun sometimes. :-) -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux -Original Message- From: fedora-infrastructure-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-infrastructure-list-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of t...@codero.com Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 1:07 PM To: fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com Subject: Infrastructure Introduction Hello, I previously worked with the Fedora Infrastructure group a year or two ago, unfortunately life prevailed and I was unable to help out much. At this time things have changed and I feel that I now have the time to help contribute to the project. I currently work as a Systems Administrator, and helped develop, implement, and maintain a large managed server environment (100+ servers - CentOS based), which range from standard one server web sites, to load balancing and MySQL/DRBD clusters. I am interested in re-joining the sysadmin tools and noc FIG's and previously had sponsorship by Mike McGrath and Matt Domsch. If you would like any additional information about my current skill set please feel free to email me. Thank you for your time, see you in IRC. ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
RE: smolt change request
+1 -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux -Original Message- From: fedora-infrastructure-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-infrastructure-list-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Mike McGrath Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 1:36 PM To: Fedora Infrastructure List Subject: smolt change request I'd like to do the hotfix described here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1622 Changes are already upstream. -Mike ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
RE: Bugzilla bot account / Fedora mail alias
My FTBFS bugzilla account is in the 'editbugs' group in bugzilla so it can set the blocked/dependson lists. That may also be necessary to change them to ASSIGNED. You have to first file the bug as NEW, then modify it to be ASSIGNED (and set nomail=1 to avoid sending the mail on this act). -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux -Original Message- From: fedora-infrastructure-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-infrastructure-list-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Till Maas Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 11:33 AM To: Fedora Infrastructure Subject: Re: Bugzilla bot account / Fedora mail alias On Fri July 17 2009, Jon Stanley wrote: On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:44 AM, Till Maasopensou...@till.name wrote: Btw. I just remembered which bot bugzilla account already exists: ftbfs - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/ftbfs There seems to be no mailing list involved, too. Nah, I don't much care if no one cares to see the mail. ftbfs goes to /dev/null pretty much (actually to ft...@domsch.com). I can create the requested alias, and you can create a bugzilla account with it. It needs no special permissions to file bugs (which is all it should be doing). Unfortunately I seem to need some special permissions, because I would like to file the bugs with status ASSIGNED and with Keywords FutureFeature, because this is what the triage SIG wanted for the old FEVer bugs. If I try to set the status from NEW to ASSGINED after the bug is created, I get an error that the account does not have the necessary permissions. I also specified both when I created the bug, but both were silently not set. The first bug I created is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512384 So I guess I need a seperate FAS account for this and apply for fedorabugs or is there some other way to do this? The ftbfs bugzilla account is capable of changing the status iirc. Regards Till ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
RE: Self introduction
Wasn't Ricky about 14 when he started with us? :-) Welcome Darren. -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux -Original Message- From: fedora-infrastructure-list-boun...@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-infrastructure-list-boun...@redhat.com] On Behalf Of Jon Stanley Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 9:55 PM To: Fedora Infrastructure Subject: Re: Self introduction On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Darren VanBurenonekop...@gmail.com wrote: So yep. That's pretty much my intro email... Welcome Darren! I just sponsored Darren into sysadmin-web, let me know if he breaks anything! Just kidding, I'm sure that won't happen :) ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
RE: Change Request: Replace perl-Date-Manip with perl-DateManip on log1
+1 -Original Message- From: fedora-infrastructure-list-boun...@redhat.com on behalf of Ricky Zhou Sent: Sat 6/6/2009 9:20 AM To: fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com Subject: Change Request: Replace perl-Date-Manip with perl-DateManip on log1 I'd like to remove perl-Date-Manip on log1 in order to allow puppet to replace it with perl-DateManip. Nothing on log1 currenty requires it. Can I get some +1s? Thanks, Ricky winmail.dat___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
RE: Fedora 10 i386 DVD download - Error 403 forbidden
sorry, part of Doug's original message was dropped - the part that had the server's name. :-( If I can get that part, I can contact the server owner. Thanks Matt Fedora Mirror Wrangler -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux -Original Message- From: Ricky Zhou [mailto:ri...@fedoraproject.org] Sent: Sat 2/7/2009 8:16 PM To: Doug Head Cc: webmas...@fedoraproject.org; mdom...@fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Fedora 10 i386 DVD download - Error 403 forbidden On 2009-02-02 11:59:04 AM, Doug Head wrote: I am trying to download the Fedora 10 i386 DVD iso. By direct download. But I am getting a forbidden error message. I have tried this on 2 different computers on 2 completely different networks, and am getting the same result. Please verify that the correct access for this file is granted so that I can download this .iso. Please see below for the error I am getting, Many thanks, Forbidden You don't have permission to access /pub/fedora/linux/releases/10/Fedora/i386/ iso/Fedora-10-i386-DVD.iso on this server. Hi, and thanks for the report. I'm CCing this email to our mirror wrangler, who will contact the administrators of the mirror. Until this gets fixed, try some alternative download URLs at: http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?path=/pub/fedora/linux/releases/10/Fedora/i386/iso/Fedora-10-i386-DVD.iso Thanks, Ricky -- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
FW: 2009 Symposium
Andrew Hutton, organizer of the Linux Symposium (formerly in Ottawa, for the next 2 years in Montreal), has invited Fedora to host some form of event concurrent with this year's Symposium, the week of July 13. There was some positive interest on this when brought up in December, but then it went silent. Is anyone willing to take this on and drive such an event? -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux -Original Message- From: Andrew J. Hutton [mailto:a...@linuxsymposium.org] Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 10:48 AM To: Domsch, Matt Subject: 2009 Symposium I would love to pick up on the idea of hosting FedoraCon here in Montreal (I'm actually here for the weekend) and try to get something firmed up if possible. -- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
RE: fedora download not working
Please be patient. The mirrors will update shortly to pick up the permission change which happened this morning, and then you won't get 'forbidden' message any more. Thanks, Matt Fedora Mirror Wrangler -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux -Original Message- From: jaider bertoli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 11/25/2008 10:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: fedora download not working Hi: I been trying to download fedora 10 by going to: http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora Forbidden You don't have permission to access /fedora/linux/releases/10/Live/i686/F10-i686-Live.iso on this server. Additionally, a 403 Forbidden error was encountered while trying to use an ErrorDocument to handle the request. -- Apache/2.0.52 (Red Hat) Server at linux.nssl.noaa.gov Port 80 Thanks let me know -- Jaider Bertoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
RE: YUM security issues...
Fedora 7 definitely behaves differently than Fedora 8 and 9. The behavior I describe began with F8. For F7 and earlier, the yum policy would chose any random mirror from the returned list, so having many mirrors on the list, some of which are unreachable from inside an organization, would be bad. The yum default policy was changed to treat the mirrorlist as a priority list, so MM returns a longer list. -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux -Original Message- From: Justin Samuel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Samuel Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 1:36 PM To: Domsch, Matt Cc: Josh Bressers; Mike McGrath; fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com; Justin Cappos; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: YUM security issues... -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Matt Domsch wrote: On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:46:15PM -0400, Josh Bressers wrote: On 25 July 2008, Matt Domsch wrote: Yes, this is a known challenge with subnet delegation in MirrorManager. We're trusting package signing (and soon, repodata signing) to prevent rogue mirrors from issuing unsigned data. In addition, I'm working on adding in a way to prevent stale mirrors (with signed content) from being used. How does one get this subnet delegation though? Can I request any subnet I want, or do we do some sort of verification? At present there is no verification (I'm not at all sure how one _could_ verify except by ARIN co delegation). However there are limits as to how large a block can be requested. Nothing larger than a IPv4 /16 can be automatically requested. Fedora Infrastructure admins can add larger blocks, and request ARIN co data when doing so. What happens if the client decided its mirror is bad, I presume it will go off and find a better one, even with delegation? Yes, the mirrorlist returned includes quite a few mirrors, in priority order. Our testing showed that when our client was in a MirrorManager-defined CIDR block for a mirror, the returned mirrorlist included only the single mirror. -- It's dangerous either way, of course, but I'm just wondering if our testing was faulty, if this has changed since we tested, or if it might be behaving differently than you expect. Possibly you tested with a block that was already defined by other mirrors and so multiple entries were returned in the mirrorist? That's just a guess, we didn't test with a block that was defined by more than one mirror (as far as we knew, at least). - -- Justin Samuel https://www.cs.arizona.edu/~jsamuel/ gpg: 0xDDF1F3EE [66EF 84E2 F184 B140 712B 55A7 2B96 AB8F DDF1 F3EE] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIih0cK5arj93x8+4RAklWAKC+Lewfd+pixUvL2MvbdCYxnjHBpQCdHtNd x5BQsM6GqW5zKpJt+RH8Vco= =w9yV -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
wiki change notes from wrong user.
Wiki change notes originating from odd user (below says changed by Mikec302, when it was me who made the change). What gives? -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux -Original Message- From: WikiAdmin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sat 5/31/2008 9:09 AM To: Mdomsch Subject: FedoraProject page FTBFS has been changed by Mikec302 Dear Mdomsch, The FedoraProject page FTBFS has been changed on 09:09, 31 May 2008 by Mikec302, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS for the current version. See https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=FTBFSdiff=0oldid=28695 for all changes since your last visit. Editor's summary: /* What to do if you get a FTBFS bug? */ Contact the editor: mail: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Special:Emailuser/Mikec302 wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mikec302 There will be no other notifications in case of further changes unless you visit this page. You could also reset the notification flags for all your watched pages on your watchlist. Your friendly FedoraProject notification system -- To change your watchlist settings, visit https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Special:Watchlist/edit Feedback and further assistance: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Help:Contents ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
need ordb.org removed from Red Hat MX mail servers
Bounces are getting this message: mx1.util.phx.redhat.com #4.4.7 SMTP; 451 ordb.org was shut down on December 18, 2006. Please remove from your mailserver. Whomever is responsible for Red Hat's mail servers needs to make this change. Thanks, Matt -Original Message- From: Domsch, Matt Sent: Mon 4/7/2008 9:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: download*.fedora.redhat.com rsyncd change request Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients. Subject: download*.fedora.redhat.com rsyncd change request Sent: 4/7/2008 9:44 AM The following recipient(s) could not be reached: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/12/2008 9:50 AM Could not deliver the message in the time limit specified. Please retry or contact your administrator. mx1.util.phx.redhat.com #4.4.7 SMTP; 451 ordb.org was shut down on December 18, 2006. Please remove from your mailserver. ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
RE: Proposal - Official Forum
I am forwarding this to the fedora-infrastructure-list which would be a better place for this discussion. How would forums benefit the Fedora community, over and above how we currently use public email lists? -- Matt Domsch Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Keiran Smith Sent: Sat 12/22/2007 8:05 AM To: Fedora Account System Subject: Proposal - Official Forum I would like to propose that Fedora adopt an official forum. In the forum users can exchange tips and tricks for the operating system Users will also be able to ask for help from the community thus making it alot easier for users to obtain help with fedora. As for the moderation Im sure some of the fedora Marketing, Ambassadors, web Teams would be happy to help as moderators. I am unsure if this has been proposed before. I am sorry if it has. Thanks, Keiran Smith ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
app3 mirrormanager publiclist/ pages horked
On Wed, Jun 20, 2007 at 12:30:34AM -0700, Thomas Chung wrote: On 6/20/07, Thomas Chung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm getting 404 Not Found when folowing URL is used. http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/publiclist/ Can we redirect to following? http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/publiclist Hmm, interesting. If I reload both URLs, I'm getting different pages with different format. Sometimes with banner. Sometimes without banner. Sometimes 404 Not Found. Sometimes it looks just fine. What's going on? The pages are regenerated at the top of each hour on each of the two separate servers. There can be a few seconds during the rsync update (it uses rsync --delay-updates even for the local file copy) while the new pages are copied into place. But app3 /srv/tg/mirrormanager/mirrorlists isn't happy which is why it's throwing the 404. The yum mirrorlists are still running fine, which makes me think it's just a failure of the one copy... My Fedora ssh key is in a machine that's offline due to my move, so I can't get onto app3 right now to fix it myself. If someone can: sudo su - cd /srv/tg/mirrormanager rm -rf mirrorlists rm -f /tmp/mirrormanager-update-each-server.lock sudo -u apache sh -c ./update-each-server That will force a regeneration of the mirrorlists. it will take about 5 minutes to run. App4 could use that too, once app3 finishes... Thanks, Matt -- Matt Domsch Software Architect Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
RE: more mirrormanager testing
The Fedora Infrastructure team has been dealing with bad hardware today on several fronts. Failure to get to admin.f.r.c/accounts or admin.f.r.c/mirrormanager is the result. They're working on it dilligently, we ask for your continued patience. Thanks, Matt -- Matt Domsch Software Architect Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gilbert E. Detillieux Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 2:11 PM To: A private discussion group for official mirrors of ftp.redhat.com Cc: fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: more mirrormanager testing On 2007-04-05 09:08, Matt Domsch wrote: Mirror Admins: Thank you to the several people who have put their data into mirrormanager https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/ already. I've made a few tweaks in the past week to speed up the queries, and it seems to be working pretty well[1]. I ask everyone to please enter their data into mirrormanager now, so we can shake out any additional bugs before F7 Test 4 is ready to go out. In particular, please create: * an account in the Fedora Account System if you haven't already OK, I go to the URL you specified above, I click on the register link (https://admin.fedora.redhat.com/accounts), and I get the following error... 502 Bad Gateway The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server. Any advice? I'd _like_ to get an account set up, but I can't see any way to do it at the moment. * a new Site * a new Host in your Site * a new ACL IP for your Host (DNS name preferred, IP ok too) * two new Category entries, one for Fedora Core, and one for Fedora Extras * For each of FC and FE, one or more URLs by which end users can get at your data (HTTP, FTP, and rsync). I imagine I can't enter any of this until _after_ i login with the FAS account, which I have yet to create. [1] occasionally we have authentication problems with the Fedora Account System, but it's much rarer that it had been. If you hit it, please just reload a few times and it'll clear. I've tried reloading repeatedly, and the 502 error happens consistently. -- Gilbert E. Detillieux E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Computer Science Web: http://www.cs.umanitoba.ca/~gedetil/ University of Manitoba Phone: (204)474-8161 Winnipeg MB CANADA R3T 2N2 Fax:(204)474-7609 -- ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
Disk space requirements
Just some stats I ran on the current data posted for the mirrors. Everything (Core + Extras, FC 1 through 6, 7test[12], development, updates, repodata): 492GB FC1: 21.5GB FC2: 35.5GB FC3: 33.1GB FC4: 52.4GB FC5: 69.6GB FC6: 77.5GB development: 50.8GB FC+E6/i386: 22.6GB FC+E6/ppc: 23.5GB FC+E6/x86_64: 24.4GB FC+E6/source: 5.1GB FC6test2: 26.8GB so we're already expecting mirrors to carry ~25GB per arch per release or thereabouts. If we continue with 3 arches, 2 releases per year, that's at least 150GB per year growth. If we add arches, Unity respins, more CD/DVD objects, and the like, it'll grow faster. -Matt -- Matt Domsch Software Architect Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com ___ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
RE: Testers needed: mirrormanager
Try again, Toshio fixed it.
--
Matt Domsch
Software Architect
Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com www.dell.com/linux
Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com
-Original Message-
From: Brian Long [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 2:11 PM
To: Domsch, Matt; A private discussion group for official mirrors of
ftp.redhat.com
Cc: fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Testers needed: mirrormanager
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 12:47 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager
I tried to login and got a 500 Internal Error:
500 Internal error
The server encountered an unexpected condition which prevented it from
fulfilling the request.
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/cherrypy/_cphttptools.py, line
103, in _run
applyFilters('before_main')
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/cherrypy/filters/__init__.py,
line 151, in applyFilters
method()
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/turbogears/visit/api.py, line
157, in before_main
plugin.record_request( visit )
File
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/turbogears/identity/visitor.py, line
165, in record_request
identity= self.identity_from_request(visit.key)
File
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/turbogears/identity/visitor.py, line
89, in identity_from_request
identity= source(visit_key)
File
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/turbogears/identity/visitor.py, line
146, in identity_from_form
identity= self.provider.validate_identity( user_name, pw, visit_key
)
File
/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/fedora/tg/identity/safasprovider.py,
line 105, in validate_identity
except fedora.accounts.AuthError, e:
NameError: global name 'fedora' is not defined
I am able to login to the https://admin.fedora.redhat.com/accounts site
with a FAS account.
/Brian/
--
Brian Long | |
. | | | . | | | .
' '
C I S C O
___
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
