Re: SANE can't find device if used through VNC - F9 (SOLVED)
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 2:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm lost there Jonathan. Where do I start? Assuming you are running a gnome desktopthere is authorizations dialog in the system-preferences-system menu. you should be able to adjust the authorizations for device access... including scanners. In fact... as jeff says system-preferences-system-Authorisations Then in the left hand pane, scroll down until you see device-access. As a sub-item of that entry you'll see Directly access scanners. Select that. In the right hand pane you'll see (amongst other things) Implicit authorisations ... click the Edit button. Hopefully it is self explanatory from then on... Bingo. Thank you so much. Is it possible to grant these authorizations remotely through the terminal? EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: SANE can't find device if used through VNC - F9
Hello, I got a F9 machine that I access through VNC. If I'm at the machine, I can open SANE and scan without any problems. If I, however, do this remotely through VNC, SANE cannot find my HP scanner. I tried the same using X11 from a Mac and it didn't work either. However, if I login as root and launch SANE, it works, if finds the scanner and scans. Any idea how to solve this issue? Thanks, EJ Anybody? I'm still searching for an answer on this issue. Still unresolved. EJ No suggestions? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: SANE can't find device if used through VNC - F9
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I got a F9 machine that I access through VNC. If I'm at the machine, I can open SANE and scan without any problems. If I, however, do this remotely through VNC, SANE cannot find my HP scanner. I tried the same using X11 from a Mac and it didn't work either. However, if I login as root and launch SANE, it works, if finds the scanner and scans. Any idea how to solve this issue? Thanks, EJ Anybody? I'm still searching for an answer on this issue. Still unresolved. EJ No suggestions? When going in remotely, are you logging in as root or as a normal user? That may have something to do with it. In the past, some SANE backends didn't run if you weren't root. I thought that was fixed, but it's a possibility. I have a Canon LIDE at home and it works fine as me or as root. When I log in as a normal user I can't use the scanner, SANE won't find it. If I log in as root, yes, SANE finds the scanner and allows me to scan. However, I don't want to give root access to people who want to scan. This is probably ConsoleKit/PolicyKit in action. When you log in sat at the machine, you're a console user with physical access to the machine, and so you get permissions to access the hardware. When logging in remotely the permissions don't get set to allow you to access connected hardware. I suggest having a read about ConsoleKit/PolicyKit and working out what policy you need to change to get the permissions you want when logging in via VNC. Jonathan. I'm lost there Jonathan. Where do I start? -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: SANE can't find device if used through VNC - F9
Hello, I got a F9 machine that I access through VNC. If I'm at the machine, I can open SANE and scan without any problems. If I, however, do this remotely through VNC, SANE cannot find my HP scanner. I tried the same using X11 from a Mac and it didn't work either. However, if I login as root and launch SANE, it works, if finds the scanner and scans. Any idea how to solve this issue? Thanks, EJ Anybody? I'm still searching for an answer on this issue. Still unresolved. EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F9 Preupgrade does not list F10? SOLVED
-- Original message -- From: unix rider [EMAIL PROTECTED] i cant speak english On 11/26/08, Alan Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Brian Millett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wget http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=70585 How about: wget http://koji.fedoraproject.org/packages/preupgrade/1.0.0/1.fc9/noarch/preupgrade- 1.0.0-1.fc9.noarch.rpm Works better. After waiting another day, I removed and reinstalled preupgrade. It listed Fedora 10 this time. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Nautilus crashes
Hello, When gnome starts nautilus crashes. It gives me a message that says that nautilus cannot be used due to an error from Bonobo when attempting to locate the factory. What's going on? Any idea how to fix it? Thansk, EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Nautilus crashes
On Thu, 2008-11-27 at 23:58 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, When gnome starts nautilus crashes. It gives me a message that says that nautilus cannot be used due to an error from Bonobo when attempting to locate the factory. What's going on? Any idea how to fix it? Thansk, EJ Any taker on this issue? EJ A few things to check on, on a text-mode screen (Ctrl-Alt-F2): - If you create a new user account (useradd test;passwd test), does this problem affect that account too? - How much free disk space do you have? (df -h) - What is your memory situation? (free) -- Chris I created a new account and the problem persists. However, this issue only seems to happen when loging in through VNC. df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 36G 6.1G 28G 19% / /dev/sda1 190M 142M 39M 79% /boot tmpfs 219M 720K 219M 1% /dev/shm free total used free sharedbuffers cached Mem:448236 438452 9784 0 9456 184464 -/+ buffers/cache: 244532 203704 Swap: 917496 68688 848808 I don't think memory is an issue. I think it's a vnc problem. Any ideas? EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F9 Preupgrade does not list F10?
-- Original message -- From: Patrick O'Callaghan [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 09:07 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Tarjei Knapstad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/11/26 Richard Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 6:17 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2008-11-25 at 20:32 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: (something in HTML) Please don't post in HTML on this list. See the Guidelines. poc I assume you were referring to my post. Apparently gmail sends both a plain text and a HTML version of the messages. I looked through the gmail settings and don't see any options to turn of HTML. Only if you have selected Rich formatting when composing a message. Turn it off by clicking Plain text. Regards, Tarjei Thanks! I could have sworn there was a setting (maybe under Google Labs) to use plaintext by default, but right now I don't see it. Anyway, I should mention that when I said (something in HTML) it was because I literally couldn't read your post in Evolution. However on restarting Evo I now can read it, so it looks like there's an Evo bug in there somewhere which only bites occasionally -- normally I can read Gmail posts with no trouble. Thanks for changing to plaintext in any case. poc Stay on the issue, please. I get excited when I see a reply to my questionjust to find out later that it's about html in emails. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
SANE can't find device if used through VNC - F9
Hello, I got a F9 machine that I access through VNC. If I'm at the machine, I can open SANE and scan without any problems. If I, however, do this remotely through VNC, SANE cannot find my HP scanner. I tried the same using X11 from a Mac and it didn't work either. However, if I login as root and launch SANE, it works, if finds the scanner and scans. Any idea how to solve this issue? Thanks, EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: F9 - F10 Upgrade Left only GRUB prompt
-- Original message -- From: Richard England [EMAIL PROTECTED] I used preupgrade (1.0.0-1.fc9.noarch) to upgrade a Dell Latitude laptop from F9 to F10. Every thing seemed to go fine but on reboot I'm getting only a GRUB prompt. The machine had a fresh F9 install (not an upgrade) and was fully up to date. Is this a case of grub.conf being out of wack or a naming issued with the disk partitions? I've been googling and found a couple of things to check out but I had to abandon the machine at work so I won't be able to get back to it until later in the week to get more details. Any insight about what to look for or possible remedial actions would be most gratefully appreciated. Thanks, ~~R Hey Richard, It's happened to me a few times in the past. Reinstall GRUB. If you don't know how to do it let me know and I'll post the instructions. If you look in the Fedora list archives, you'll find them there too since I've posted them before. EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Preupgrade issue F9 F10
Hello, When I run preupgrade, it doesn't show F 10 in the drop down menu. All I can see is Rawhide if I check the box at the bottom. My system is up to date. Thanks, EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Preupgrade issue F9 F10
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 7:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, When I run preupgrade, it doesn't show F 10 in the drop down menu. All I can see is Rawhide if I check the box at the bottom. My system is up to date. Thanks, EJ Download: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/packages/preupgrade/1.0.0/1.fc9/noarch/preupgrade- 1.0.0-1.fc9.noarch.rpm And then type: su -c 'rpm -Uvh preupgrade-1.0.0-1.fc9.noarch' Everyone's asking this very question... Oh well. I did that already. I get the following errors. tmp]# rpm -Uvh /tmp/preupgrade-1.0.0-1.fc9.noarch.rpm error: open of !DOCTYPE failed: No such file or directory error: open of HTML failed: No such file or directory error: open of PUBLIC failed: No such file or directory -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: Preupgrade issue F9 F10
-- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 7:12 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, When I run preupgrade, it doesn't show F 10 in the drop down menu. All I can see is Rawhide if I check the box at the bottom. My system is up to date. Thanks, EJ Download: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/packages/preupgrade/1.0.0/1.fc9/noarch/preupgrade- 1.0.0-1.fc9.noarch.rpm And then type: su -c 'rpm -Uvh preupgrade-1.0.0-1.fc9.noarch' Everyone's asking this very question... Oh well. I did that already. I get the following errors. tmp]# rpm -Uvh /tmp/preupgrade-1.0.0-1.fc9.noarch.rpm error: open of !DOCTYPE failed: No such file or directory error: open of HTML failed: No such file or directory error: open of PUBLIC failed: No such file or directory Nevermind, it was the result of a partially downloaded file with curl. It still doesn't show F 10. EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: E-mail
-- Original message -- From: Allen Meyers [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am new to both linux and fedora and I dearly love what I have experienced thus far except for e-mail. Now because I receive a fair share and must answer it would be nice to be able to do so from my linux program, but that has eluded me thus far. My DSL and e-mail provider is att yahoo and I get these nasty notes that I am sending and receiving not within the scope of their SSL protocol. Would they shut me down? I have not a clue. Is there anyone out there with a viable option. Would I not experience the same thing with a fetch it program of some sort. Allen Allen, You hijacked another thread. Don't do this please, it creates confusion. Another thing, don't post at the top, do it at the bottom. It's easier to follow up this way. To answer your question. You won't get shut down. You're the only one at risk if you're not using SSL (encryption) for your emails. They're just warning you, I guess. Using Evolution in Linux, set up your account to use TLS or SSL in security where it says Use Secure Connection. In Authentication Type, click on the button that says Check for Supported Types. It'll communicate with the server and let you know which type of security you can select from the drop down menu next to the button. You have to do the same for both outgoing and incoming mail. You need to know the address for your servers, both incoming and outgoing mail servers. Incoming is either POP or IMAP, outgoing is SMTP. I give you the name of the protocols in case they send it like that and you get confused as what is what. Hope this helps. EJ - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: fedora-list@redhat.com Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 12:18 PM Subject: fedora-list Digest, Vol 53, Issue 72 Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to fedora-list@redhat.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of fedora-list digest... Today's Topics: 1. Re: Closed source modules will be banned from kernel? (max) 2. Re: Again - F9 default web browser (Barry Yu) 3. Re: Any suggestions for Really Annoying Alarms !!? (Bruno Wolff III) 4. No streams available (Colin Paul Adams) 5. Re: sendmail (Bill Davidsen) 6. Re: No streams available (Colin Paul Adams) 7. Re: Sunday Morning idle queries ?? (Bill Davidsen) 8. Re: Can't get CNN video sound ?? (Bill Davidsen) 9. [F9] laptop not booting - reinstall MBR? (Don Levey) 10. NetworkManager working only for root user. (Eby John) 11. Re: [F9] laptop not booting - reinstall MBR? (Phil Meyer) 12. Firefox extension equivalent to Unplug (Paul Smith) 13. Re: Any suggestions for Really Annoying Alarms !!? (William Case) 14. Re: F9: Problem with Services tool (Dan Thurman) 15. Re: How long does it take Anaconda to write / format new partition table (F9) (Nat Gross) 16. Re: Periodic Fedora 9 system hangs with jumpy mouse (Deron Meranda) 17. Re: [F9] laptop not booting - reinstall MBR? (Don Levey) -- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2008 12:04:09 -0400 From: max [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Closed source modules will be banned from kernel? To: For users of Fedora fedora-list@redhat.com Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Andrew Kelly wrote: On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 08:35 +0100, Anne Wilson wrote: On Monday 07 July 2008 20:37:33 Tom Horsley wrote: On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 19:51:51 +0100 Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Binary modules usually last only a few releases before changes in the kernel break them by accident anyway so I would assume that if a binary driver vendor goes under the clock is ticking. I wouldn't say by accident - It has been my experience that most of the time, the breakage is not only highly deliberate, but triggered mostly by the high incidence of extreme OCD which kernel developers seem to suffer from, causing them to make fantastic wholesale changes to driver interfaces for utterly trivial cosmetic reasons which add no stability or functionality, but merely relieve their obsessive need to correct some flaw which no one else can perceive :-). Why is it considered OK to insult people on a mailing list, when you wouldn't to their face? Anne It's not actually considered OK, Anne, it's just human nature at work and continuing evidence of the decline of society. People often lose their decorum when there is no immediate need to display it,
Re: samba and write privileges
-- Original message -- From: Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 18:22 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 7:46 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, On a samba share which anyone can see but just a few can write to, how can I make the files writable by anyone with write access? Right now, when a user with write access creates a file and it can only be modified by that user. Thanks, EJ -- Original message -- From: Vnpenguin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Put all user into a group play with create mask Samba option. I'm a little confused here. I've been reading some of the samba documentation and I haven't got it yet. Are you talking about a linux group or a windows group? I'm not connecting to any windows domain. I also set create mask to 0755 and still it won't let everybody on the write list modify the files. EJ you probably would have better success with... create mask = 664 directory mask = 775 but I really think you want to use groups...you just want to fight it. samba groups and unix groups are the same if they are mapped - pointers were given yesterday Craig Craig, I appreciate the help. I have zero experience with Windows. I've only used MacOS and Linux my whole life. The reason I'm still not using groups is because I don't quite get the mapping. I'm not joining a Windows Domain. The other thing is, I don't know if I should create a samba users group in the system and add my samba users to it or use an existing group. I'm lost here. Thanks, EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Problem with smbpasswd
Hello, I set up samba and added my user name w/ smbpasswd and there was no problems. I can connect to my samba share from MacOSX and Windows. However, I created a new user with useradd and when I try to set his smb password I get the following errors: smbpasswd NewUser New SMB password: Retype new SMB password: Failed to find entry for user NewUser. Failed to modify password entry for user NewUser What's going on here? How can I fix this? Please help. EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: Problem with smbpasswd
-- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, I set up samba and added my user name w/ smbpasswd and there was no problems. I can connect to my samba share from MacOSX and Windows. However, I created a new user with useradd and when I try to set his smb password I get the following errors: smbpasswd NewUser New SMB password: Retype new SMB password: Failed to find entry for user NewUser. Failed to modify password entry for user NewUser What's going on here? How can I fix this? Please help. EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Nevermind I forgot to add the option -a -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: Problem with smbpasswd
-- Original message -- From: Luc MAIGNAN [EMAIL PROTECTED] try : smbpasswd -a Newuser [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : Hello, I set up samba and added my user name w/ smbpasswd and there was no problems. I can connect to my samba share from MacOSX and Windows. However, I created a new user with useradd and when I try to set his smb password I get the following errors: smbpasswd NewUser New SMB password: Retype new SMB password: Failed to find entry for user NewUser. Failed to modify password entry for user NewUser What's going on here? How can I fix this? Please help. EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Thanks Luc -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
smb not mounting share for specific user
Hello, I added a user with useradd. Then added the user to smb with smbpasswd -a. Then restarted smb. Now, I can mount the samba share using my user name. However, when I try to mount the share with the newly created user, even though I log in and smb accepts the user and password, it gives me the following error: The volume Storage could not be mounted Anybody knows what the issue is here? Thanks, EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: smb not mounting share for specific user (SOLVED)
-- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, I added a user with useradd. Then added the user to smb with smbpasswd -a. Then restarted smb. Now, I can mount the samba share using my user name. However, when I try to mount the share with the newly created user, even though I log in and smb accepts the user and password, it gives me the following error: The volume Storage could not be mounted Anybody knows what the issue is here? Thanks, EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list I forgot to add the user to the valid user of the share. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: smb not mounting share for specific user (SOLVED)
-- Original message -- From: Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 19:34 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, I added a user with useradd. Then added the user to smb with smbpasswd -a. Then restarted smb. Now, I can mount the samba share using my user name. However, when I try to mount the share with the newly created user, even though I log in and smb accepts the user and password, it gives me the following error: The volume Storage could not be mounted Anybody knows what the issue is here? Thanks, EJ I forgot to add the user to the valid user of the share. 1. it is more useful to use 'groups' instead of users... You can set the group ownership of the share and folders inside... i.e. image /home/samba/files is a file share for samba users chgrp samba_users /home/samba/files -R chmod g+w,g+w /home/samba/files -R add @samba_users to share (valid users = @samba_users) now all files and folders are owned by 'samba_users' group and all new files and folders will likewise be owned by 'samba_users' group 2. You don't need to restart samba after changes to smb.conf as the configuration file is reloaded automatically every minute (I think), but if it makes you feel better to restart samba service...by all means. Craig Maybe a dumb question. Do I need to create a new group in the system with groupadd samba_users? Thanks a lot. EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: smb not mounting share for specific user (SOLVED)
-- Original message -- From: Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 20:42 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Original message -- From: Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 19:34 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, I added a user with useradd. Then added the user to smb with smbpasswd -a. Then restarted smb. Now, I can mount the samba share using my user name. However, when I try to mount the share with the newly created user, even though I log in and smb accepts the user and password, it gives me the following error: The volume Storage could not be mounted Anybody knows what the issue is here? Thanks, EJ I forgot to add the user to the valid user of the share. 1. it is more useful to use 'groups' instead of users... You can set the group ownership of the share and folders inside... i.e. image /home/samba/files is a file share for samba users chgrp samba_users /home/samba/files -R chmod g+w,g+w /home/samba/files -R add @samba_users to share (valid users = @samba_users) now all files and folders are owned by 'samba_users' group and all new files and folders will likewise be owned by 'samba_users' group 2. You don't need to restart samba after changes to smb.conf as the configuration file is reloaded automatically every minute (I think), but if it makes you feel better to restart samba service...by all means. Craig Maybe a dumb question. Do I need to create a new group in the system with groupadd samba_users? Thanks a lot. not a dumb question at all but a clear indication that you haven't found samba documentation that is worth following so let me first point out... http://samba.org/samba/docs/ which I would unhesitatingly declare the best open source documentation available see the 'Samba 3 HowTo' and 'Samba by Example' The issue is that Windows has a lot of pre-conceived notions of users, groups, ID's and samba tries to accommodate them in ways that seem confusing to UNIX/Linux users but are pretty obvious to those familiar with Windows Networking concepts. The idea is that you 'map' samba groups to Unix groups. The documentation on the subject begins here... http://samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/groupmapping.html#id38254 8 so if all the users were part of the Linux group 'users', you could conceivably map the 'Samba Domain Group' called Domain Users to the posix group 'users' net groupmap list will print a list of current samba groups (no doubt 'unassigned') Craig You're right. I should've gone to samba.org in the first place. I just followed a few HOWTOs I googled. Do I need to use groups and do the mapping if most of our users are on macs and we're only using samba trying to accomodate two Windows users? The boss and a sales person want access to design files. Thanks, EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
samba and virtual users
Hello, Is it possible to create a smb user without having to create a system user for it? Using the command smbpasswd -a NewUser fails with error: Failed to modify password entry for user NewUser. I entered encrypt password = yes and smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd in my smb.conf and still doesn't work. Anyone knows the answer? Please help. EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: samba and virtual users (no local accounts)
-- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, Is it possible to create a smb user without having to create a system user for it? Using the command smbpasswd -a NewUser fails with error: Failed to modify password entry for user NewUser. I entered encrypt password = yes and smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd in my smb.conf and still doesn't work. Anyone knows the answer? Please help. EJ Ur?!!! Help, anybody? EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: samba and virtual users (no local accounts)
-- Original message -- From: Craig White [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 2008-07-07 at 01:01 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, Is it possible to create a smb user without having to create a system user for it? Using the command smbpasswd -a NewUser fails with error: Failed to modify password entry for user NewUser. I entered encrypt password = yes and smb passwd file = /etc/samba/smbpasswd in my smb.conf and still doesn't work. Anyone knows the answer? Please help. EJ Ur?!!! Help, anybody? No - a samba user MUST be a posix user also. Craig Thanks for replying Craig. So what's the best approach if I need a lot of smb accounts and I don't want to clutter my /home partition with users' home folders? EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: Trouble with GRUB
-- Original message -- From: Arkadiy Butermanov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Always after rebooting and before arriving of grub screen I've seen label in the bottom of the screen - GRUB Loading Stage2. But today I've turned on my computer and there is no such this label. There was only GRUB. And this label is staying on screen while I dont reboot... Help me please! Reinstall grub. Search the list for the instructions I posted yesterday. If you can't find them reply to the list and I'll copy and paste them. -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
No vnc desktop with selinux enabled
Hello, I'm having an issue with selinux. Whenever I enable selinux, vnc doens't start my gnome desktop. I only get a grey screen. Once I set selinux to permisive, I connect to the vncserver and can see and use my desktop. How can I use my desktop with selinux enabled? Thanks, EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: No vnc desktop with selinux enabled
2008/7/5 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello,
I'm having an issue with selinux. Whenever I enable selinux, vnc doens't
start my gnome desktop. I only get a grey screen. Once I set selinux to
permisive, I connect to the vncserver and can see and use my desktop.
How can I use my desktop with selinux enabled?
Thanks,
EJ
-- Original message --
From: Olivier Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can connect to the box via ssh and forward you vnc port.
ex:
ssh -L 5900:localhost:5900 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then connect your vnc client to localhost on the forwarded port.
vncviewer 127.0.0.1:5900
selinux can run normally on your box and the vnc traffic is secured as well.
That's what I do and selinux may run normally but it won't let me start my
Desktop.
Below is the output of audit.log when I start the vncserver
Thanks for your help.
channel 4: open failed: connect failed: Connection refused
type=USER_START msg=audit(1215278387.539:6023): user pid=27840 uid=0 auid=500
subj=unconfined_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0 msg='op=PAM:session_open
acct=MyUserName exe=/sbin/runuser (hostname=?, addr=?, terminal=pts/2
res=success)'
type=CRED_ACQ msg=audit(1215278387.539:6024): user pid=27840 uid=0 auid=500
subj=unconfined_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0 msg='op=PAM:setcred acct=MyUserName
exe=/sbin/runuser (hostname=?, addr=?, terminal=pts/2 res=success)'
type=CRED_DISP msg=audit(1215278387.594:6025): user pid=27840 uid=0 auid=500
subj=unconfined_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0 msg='op=PAM:setcred acct=MyUserName
exe=/sbin/runuser (hostname=?, addr=?, terminal=pts/2 res=success)'
type=USER_END msg=audit(1215278387.595:6026): user pid=27840 uid=0 auid=500
subj=unconfined_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0 msg='op=PAM:session_close
acct=MyUserName exe=/sbin/runuser (hostname=?, addr=?, terminal=pts/2
res=success)'
type=ANOM_ABEND msg=audit(1215278387.704:6027): auid=4294967295 uid=500 gid=500
ses=4294967295 subj=system_u:system_r:unconfined_notrans_t:s0 pid=3027
comm=tomboy sig=11
type=USER_START msg=audit(1215278390.622:6028): user pid=27859 uid=0 auid=500
subj=unconfined_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0 msg='op=PAM:session_open
acct=MyUserName exe=/sbin/runuser (hostname=?, addr=?, terminal=pts/2
res=success)'
type=CRED_ACQ msg=audit(1215278390.622:6029): user pid=27859 uid=0 auid=500
subj=unconfined_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0 msg='op=PAM:setcred acct=MyUserName
exe=/sbin/runuser (hostname=?, addr=?, terminal=pts/2 res=success)'
type=CRED_DISP msg=audit(1215278393.696:6030): user pid=27859 uid=0 auid=500
subj=unconfined_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0 msg='op=PAM:setcred acct=MyUserName
exe=/sbin/runuser (hostname=?, addr=?, terminal=pts/2 res=success)'
type=USER_END msg=audit(1215278393.696:6031): user pid=27859 uid=0 auid=500
subj=unconfined_u:system_r:initrc_t:s0 msg='op=PAM:session_close
acct=MyUserName exe=/sbin/runuser (hostname=?, addr=?, terminal=pts/2
res=success)'
type=AVC msg=audit(1215278393.750:6032): avc: denied { connectto } for
pid=27907 comm=ck-get-x11-serv
path=002F746D702F2E5831312D756E69782F5831
scontext=system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
tcontext=unconfined_u:system_r:unconfined_notrans_t:s0 tclass=unix_stream_socket
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1215278393.750:6032): arch=c03e syscall=42
success=yes exit=0 a0=3 a1=7fff1a692120 a2=6e a3=7fff1a692123 items=0
ppid=27906 pid=27907 auid=4294967295 uid=500 gid=500 euid=500 suid=500
fsuid=500 egid=500 sgid=500 fsgid=500 tty=(none) ses=4294967295
comm=ck-get-x11-serv exe=/usr/libexec/ck-get-x11-server-pid
subj=system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key=(null)
type=AVC msg=audit(1215278393.751:6033): avc: denied { read } for pid=27907
comm=ck-get-x11-serv name=.Xauthority dev=md3 ino=32941
scontext=system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:user_home_dir_t:s0 tclass=file
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1215278393.751:6033): arch=c03e syscall=21
success=yes exit=0 a0=9e83b0 a1=4 a2=9e83c8 a3=3d0d567a70 items=0 ppid=27906
pid=27907 auid=4294967295 uid=500 gid=500 euid=500 suid=500 fsuid=500 egid=500
sgid=500 fsgid=500 tty=(none) ses=4294967295 comm=ck-get-x11-serv
exe=/usr/libexec/ck-get-x11-server-pid
subj=system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 key=(null)
type=AVC msg=audit(1215278393.751:6034): avc: denied { getattr } for
pid=27907 comm=ck-get-x11-serv path=/home/MyUserName/.Xauthority dev=md3
ino=32941 scontext=system_u:system_r:consolekit_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
tcontext=unconfined_u:object_r:user_home_dir_t:s0 tclass=file
type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1215278393.751:6034): arch=c03e syscall=5
success=yes exit=0 a0=4 a1=7fff1a690e30 a2=7fff1a690e30 a3=9e9180 items=0
ppid=27906 pid=27907 auid=4294967295 uid=500 gid=500 euid=500 suid=500
fsuid=500 egid=500 sgid=500 fsgid=500 tty=(none) ses=4294967295
Re: grub not working after kernel update
-- Original message -- From: Joe Klemmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 3 Jul 2008, lee wrote: I just upgraded my laptop using yum. Upgrade included a new kernel, after upgrade finished I rebooted. Now all I get is GRUB on my screen. I booted with rescue disk and can see nothing wrong with grub. New kernel is 2.6.26.9-76.fc9.i686. This happened to me recently. I booted from a live cd and reinstalled grub. After that the system booted up. If you don't know how do it let us knows to get step by step instructions. EJ Thanks for all the help. Used rescue disk and reinstalled grub. Works fine now. Heh, I wish I'd seen this earlier. The same thing happened to me and now the box is feeling less than cooperative. Could someone please post the step by step instructions for an oldtimer? I'd google but I'm having to use a public box to access the 'Net at the moment. If it's not to much trouble could you CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED] please? It's bood to have a fallback. Joe Get the live CD or the Fedora 9 Installer DVD. Make sure your computer BIOS is configured to start from the cd/dvd, this is in case it doesn't boot up from the cd/dvd. From the CD open the terminal. From the Installer DVD select Rescue Mode. From the CD terminal become root by doing: su - There's no password. From the DVD no need, you fall into a terminal. 1-Let's find your boot partition fdisk -l You'll get something like this among other things. Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1 25 200781 83 Linux /dev/sda2 26486638885332+ 8e Linux LVM See the asterisk? That's your boot partition, sda1. So now you know. 2- Let's restart the grub boot loader type grub and press enter. You'll get this. # grub Probing devices to guess BIOS drives. This may take a long time. GNU GRUB version 0.97 (640K lower / 3072K upper memory) [ Minimal BASH-like line editing is supported. For the first word, TAB lists possible command completions. Anywhere else TAB lists the possible completions of a device/filename.] grub 3- At the grub prompt let's select the partition with the command root (hd0,0). Zero means the first one. This is the output. grub root (hd0,0) root (hd0,0) Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83 If your boot partition is sda2 then the command would be: root (hd0,0). For sdb1: root (hd1,0). For sdb2: root (hd1,1). Got it? 4- Once the partition is selected, reinstall grub with this command. setup (hd0) Note. If your partition was sdb1 then setup (hd1) 5- Now enter quit at the grub prompt and reboot. If you have any problems, post here the errors as well as the output of fdisk -l Hope that helps. EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Anaconda sees 2 SATA Drives as One
Hello, I have 2 SATA Drives, blank, no partitions. I have them plugged into the motherboard which is an ASUS P4P800 Deluxe. When I run the installer, Anaconda shows only one drive and labels it as Linux Device Manager or something like that. What's going on and how can I see both drives independently? EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: Anaconda sees 2 SATA Drives as One
-- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hello, I have 2 SATA Drives, blank, no partitions. I have them plugged into the motherboard which is an ASUS P4P800 Deluxe. When I run the installer, Anaconda shows only one drive and labels it as Linux Device Manager or something like that. What's going on and how can I see both drives independently? EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Disable RAID in the BIOS. :) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: RAID 1, F9 not booting up
-- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I did a fresh install of F9. I created a RAID 1 as follows: RAID Devices /dev/md0 /boot /ext3 100mb /dev/md1 VolGroup00 LVM 476835mb /dev/sda /dev/sda1 Software RAID 100 MB as boot /dev/sda2 Software RAID as Logical Volume Management /dev/sdb /dev/sdb1 Software RAID 100 MB as boot /dev/sdb2 Software RAID as Logical Volume Management Then I created a LVM volume as follows: LVM Volume Groups VolGroup00 lvmhome /home /ext3 lvmroot / /ext3 60gb lvmswap /swap 10gb I then installed F9 and when I rebooted I got stuck with the following message: grub loading stage2 I've fixed this before using grub from a rescue cd but not with a RAID setup. Please advise. Thanks, EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list I boot up from a live cd and installed grub on each /boot partition. After that the system booted and I saw both raid disks working in /proc/mdstat EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: grub not working after kernel update
-- Original message -- From: lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] Help: I just upgraded my laptop using yum. Upgrade included a new kernel, after upgrade finished I rebooted. Now all I get is GRUB on my screen. I booted with rescue disk and can see nothing wrong with grub. New kernel is 2.6.26.9-76.fc9.i686. Thanks Lee -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list This happened to me recently. I booted from a live cd and reinstalled grub. After that the system booted up. If you don't know how do it let us knows to get step by step instructions. EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
RAID and /boot partitions
Hi, When creating a RAID 1 in F9. Does it make sense to make the /boot partition on both discs a RAID too? I have /boot and / as RAID 1 (dm-0 and dm-1). If I disconnect one of the drives, the computer freezes. Isn't the RAID supposed to keep it running? I'm really new to this, so any help is appreciated. Thanks, EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: RAID and /boot partitions
-- Original message -- From: Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, When creating a RAID 1 in F9. Does it make sense to make the /boot partition on both discs a RAID too? I have /boot and / as RAID 1 (dm-0 and dm-1). If I disconnect one of the drives, the computer freezes. Isn't the RAID supposed to keep it running? I'm really new to this, so any help is appreciated. Are you sure /boot is on a raid partition, and not on a dm pseudo device? If you created a partition on your drives, made a raid-1 of the two partitions (100-200MB is good), and then did whatever with the rest of your disk, you should be fine. If you made one huge raid array and used dm to break it up, you are not fine. Do cat /proc/mdstat and see that there is a small raid-1 for boot, and df to check that /dev/mdX is mounted on /boot. If that's the case you should be good, otherwise you probably don't boot off one drive. NOTE: your BIOS may not boot off the 2nd drive if the 1st drive is present and has data errors, should if the 1st drive is dead. Some BIOS do, some don't. -- Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. - from Slashdot This is the output of df. Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/md1 470535632 3951984 442681744 1% / /dev/md0 99099 12499 81484 14% /boot tmpfs 203216848 2032120 1% /dev/shm And this is the output of cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0] 102336 blocks [2/2] [UU] md1 : active raid1 sda3[0] sdb3[1] 478038080 blocks [2/2] [UU] unused devices: none I have two drives with /boot and / If I unplug the first one, the system remains up and running. If I however unplug the second one, the system becomes unstable, X crashes, and eventually the system becomes irresponsive. Why does this happen with one disk only? Thanks, EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: RAID and /boot partitions
-- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Original message -- From: Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, When creating a RAID 1 in F9. Does it make sense to make the /boot partition on both discs a RAID too? I have /boot and / as RAID 1 (dm-0 and dm-1). If I disconnect one of the drives, the computer freezes. Isn't the RAID supposed to keep it running? I'm really new to this, so any help is appreciated. Are you sure /boot is on a raid partition, and not on a dm pseudo device? If you created a partition on your drives, made a raid-1 of the two partitions (100-200MB is good), and then did whatever with the rest of your disk, you should be fine. If you made one huge raid array and used dm to break it up, you are not fine. Do cat /proc/mdstat and see that there is a small raid-1 for boot, and df to check that /dev/mdX is mounted on /boot. If that's the case you should be good, otherwise you probably don't boot off one drive. NOTE: your BIOS may not boot off the 2nd drive if the 1st drive is present and has data errors, should if the 1st drive is dead. Some BIOS do, some don't. -- Bill Davidsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] We have more to fear from the bungling of the incompetent than from the machinations of the wicked. - from Slashdot This is the output of df. Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/md1 470535632 3951984 442681744 1% / /dev/md0 99099 12499 81484 14% /boot tmpfs 203216848 2032120 1% /dev/shm And this is the output of cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0] 102336 blocks [2/2] [UU] md1 : active raid1 sda3[0] sdb3[1] 478038080 blocks [2/2] [UU] unused devices: none I have two drives with /boot and / If I unplug the first one, the system remains up and running. If I however unplug the second one, the system becomes unstable, X crashes, and eventually the system becomes irresponsive. Why does this happen with one disk only? Thanks, EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list To answer my own question. The problem is that the swap partition is only on one disk and it's not RAIDed. So when I unplug the drive with the swap partition, the system goes down. The next step would be to create a RAID for swap and make the system use it. EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
RAID 1, F9 not booting up
Hi, I did a fresh install of F9. I created a RAID 1 as follows: RAID Devices /dev/md0 /boot /ext3 100mb /dev/md1 VolGroup00 LVM 476835mb /dev/sda /dev/sda1 Software RAID 100 MB as boot /dev/sda2 Software RAID as Logical Volume Management /dev/sdb /dev/sdb1 Software RAID 100 MB as boot /dev/sdb2 Software RAID as Logical Volume Management Then I created a LVM volume as follows: LVM Volume Groups VolGroup00 lvmhome/home /ext3 lvmroot/ /ext3 60gb lvmswap/swap 10gb I then installed F9 and when I rebooted I got stuck with the following message: grub loading stage2 I've fixed this before using grub from a rescue cd but not with a RAID setup. Please advise. Thanks, EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
RAID1 in F9
Hello, I'd like to create a RAID1 with 2 500GB HD I got. Can anyone point me to a good step by step howto to do this with Fedora 9? Thanks, EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: RAID1 in F9
-- Original message -- From: Zlatko [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 17:35 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'd like to create a RAID1 with 2 500GB HD I got. Can anyone point me to a good step by step howto to do this with Fedora 9? Thanks, EJ Example: fdisk /dev/sda here you can create partitions for the first disk, assuming that your first disk is sda. For all partitions, except for the swap type, choose raid autodetect type (fd). fdisk /dev/sdb do the same thing as for /dev/sda then do this: mdadm --create /dev/md0 -l 1 -n 2 /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1 mdadm --create /dev/md1 -l 1 -n 2 /dev/sda2 /dev/sdb2 and so on, for all partitions that are raid autodetect type. After creating md devices, you must format them: mkfs.ext3 -L /some_label /dev/md0 and so on, for all of md devices you created. Don't forget to mkswap all swap partitions. Use this as your guide: man mount man fdisk man mdadm (or mdadm --help) -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Thanks for the help Zlatko. Unfortunately, my knowledge of linux is limited to networking, email and apache services. I've been using linux for years but never had to do something like this. I don't know how to format the disk with fdisk and I for sure don't know how to mkswap all swap partitions. I'd appreciate more elaborate instructions. EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Re: Adding an ATA to a F9 installed on a SATA drive
-- Original message -- From: dexter [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu June 26 2008 06:20:23 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a two 500 Gb ATA drives that I'd like to add to F9. This computer has the onboard socket for ATA, but F9 is installed on a SATA drive. How do I go about formatting and adding these drives? I'd appreciate a good howto tutorial on the web or step by step instructions here. I've been using Fedora for years, but never had to do this. I'd suggest using gparted its a simple point and click operation and can do resizing of ext3 ntfs and much much more ... ...dex -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list How do I locate the drive? My SATA drive is sda. I was expecting the ATA to be hda, but I can't find that. Thanks, EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
Adding an ATA to a F9 installed on a SATA drive
Hi, I have a two 500 Gb ATA drives that I'd like to add to F9. This computer has the onboard socket for ATA, but F9 is installed on a SATA drive. How do I go about formatting and adding these drives? I'd appreciate a good howto tutorial on the web or step by step instructions here. I've been using Fedora for years, but never had to do this. Thanks, EJ -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
