is there any inconvenience in defining new yum groups?
is there a way to request new yum groups related to a particular issue? i'm thinking of embedded linux developers, who might want to install the Embedded Linux group, which would contain packages like squashfs-tools, mtd-tools, mtd-tools-ubi and so on. it wouldn't be hard to put together a list of the standard embedded-related packages one would want. is there a protocol for requesting a new group, or is it not worth the trouble? rday -- Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry. Web page: http://crashcourse.ca Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
Re: is there any inconvenience in defining new yum groups?
On 12/02/2009 03:57 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: is there a way to request new yum groups related to a particular issue? i'm thinking of embedded linux developers, who might want to install the Embedded Linux group, which would contain packages like squashfs-tools, mtd-tools, mtd-tools-ubi and so on. it wouldn't be hard to put together a list of the standard embedded-related packages one would want. is there a protocol for requesting a new group, or is it not worth the trouble? Such questions should be directed to fedora-devel list but the process is defined in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_use_and_edit_comps.xml_for_package_groups Rahul -- fedora-list mailing list fedora-list@redhat.com To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
