[Bug 189892] Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-21 02:21 EST --- Ooops. The .pc file needs to be in the devel package, not the examples. :) Yeah, thinks seem to work fine with dssi-devel not depending on dssi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190040] Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hydrogen - Advanced drum machine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190040 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189892] Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190027] Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: hexter-dssi - DSSI software synthesizer plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190027 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192583] New: Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192583 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-XML-Parser - XML parsing class based on PHP's bundled expat Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-XML-Parser.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-XML-Parser-1.2.7-1.fc5.src.rpm Description: http://remi.collet.free.fr/rpms/extras/php-pear-XML-Parser-build.log This is an XML parser based on PHPs built-in xml extension. It supports two basic modes of operation: func and event. In func mode, it will look for a function named after each element (xmltag_ELEMENT for start tags and xmltag_ELEMENT_ for end tags), and in event mode it uses a set of generic callbacks. Since version 1.2.0 there's a new XML_Parser_Simple class that makes parsing of most XML documents easier, by automatically providing a stack for the elements. Furthermore its now possible to split the parser from the handler object, so you do not have to extend XML_Parser anymore in order to parse a document with it. With DB, HTTP (Bug #190156), Mail (Bug #190066), Net_Socket (Bug #190957), Net_SMTP (Bug #190958), extras will provides all the extensions which was provides by php until version 5.0.4 (in FC4). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189884] Review Request: LASH Audio Session Handler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: LASH Audio Session Handler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189884 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191604] Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191604 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-21 04:38 EST --- Still not 100% happy with the ldconfig stuff, but at least this way my specs are consistent with each other. Shuffling files around, so new files are at: http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineakd.spec http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineakd-0.8.4-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191607] Review Request: lineak_xosdplugin - Onscreen display support for lineakd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_xosdplugin - Onscreen display support for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191607 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-21 04:40 EST --- Shuffling files around on my server, and making a few changes to bring things up to par. http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineak_xosdplugin.spec http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineak_xosdplugin-0.8.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191606] Review Request: lineak_kdeplugins - KDE-based actions for lineakd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_kdeplugins - KDE-based actions for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191606 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-21 04:41 EST --- Shuffling files around on my server, and making a few changes to bring things up to par. http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineak_kdeplugins.spec http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineak_kdeplugins-0.8.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191605] Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191605 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-21 04:41 EST --- Shuffling files around on my server, and making a few changes to bring things up to par. http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineak_defaultplugin.spec http://rpm.forevermore.net/lineak/lineak_defaultplugin-0.8.4-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192540] Review Request: cal3d - A skeletal based 3-D character animation library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: cal3d - A skeletal based 3-D character animation library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192540 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-21 05:50 EST --- spec file looks good to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 187621] Review Request: blam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-21 08:12 EST --- removed the .a, .la, and .so files. Eeek! Why also the .so files? These are plugin DSOs in %_libdir/blam/ which are local to this application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 183438] Review Request: idioskopos (C++ Introspection Library)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: idioskopos (C++ Introspection Library) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183438 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added QAContact|fedora-extras- |fedora-package- |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Severity|enhancement |normal Keywords||FutureFeature [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||FutureFeature --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-21 12:37 EST --- New release - 0.2.0 Small changes to spec file to remove doxygen and graphiz build dependencies since docs are now pre-built. Spec Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/idioskopos.spec SRPM Name or Url: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/fedora/5/srpms/idioskopos-0.2.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 183439] Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: papyrus (Canvas drawing library based on cairo/cairomm) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=183439 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-21 13:41 EST --- rpmlint of papyrus: W: papyrus incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.10-1 0.1.11-1.fc6 You're one behind in the changelogs. Sources do not match: 3d0c75f05409da34a8766e7ddbc9df0f papyrus-0.1.11.tar.bz2 (download) 17886301eb027ff4d727c9d27b38570f papyrus-0.1.11.tar.bz2 (srpm) The srpm appears to have a more recent ChangeLog. While you're at it change the Source to point to download.sourceforge.net to automatically choose a mirror. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192600] New: Review Request: sflowtool - Command line utility for analyzing sFlow data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192600 Summary: Review Request: sflowtool - Command line utility for analyzing sFlow data Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://home.bawue.net/~ixs/sflowtool/sflowtool.spec SRPM URL: http://home.bawue.net/~ixs/sflowtool/sflowtool-3.10-1.src.rpm Description: The core component of the sFlow toolkit is the sflowtool command line utility. sflowtool interfaces to utilities such as tcpdump, ntop and Snort for detailed packet tracing and analysis, NetFlow compatible collectors for IP flow accounting, and provides text based output that can be used in scripts to provide customized analysis and reporting and for integrating with other tools such as MRTG or rrdtool NB: Please take a look at the license, it looks pretty BSDish to me, but someone else should please make sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190129] Review Request: python-krbV
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: python-krbV
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190129
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-21 14:13 EST ---
New specfile and srpm posted:
http://people.redhat.com/mikeb/python-krbV/python-krbV.spec
http://people.redhat.com/mikeb/python-krbV/python-krbV-1.0.12-3.src.rpm
Fixed .spec permissions (rpmbuild -ts was doing something funny).
Removed BuildRequires: python
Replaced $RPM_BUILD_ROOT with %{buildroot}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191208] Review Request: The Ipe extensible drawing editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: The Ipe extensible drawing editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191208 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-21 14:13 EST --- Update: Spec URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/ipe.spec SRPM URL: http://www.di.ens.fr/~rineau/Fedora/ipe-6.0-0.3.pre26.src.rpm * Sun May 21 2006 Laurent Rineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 6.0-0.3.pre26 - Added a desktop file for Ipe. * Sun May 21 2006 Laurent Rineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] - 6.0-0.2.pre26 - Fix directories ownership. - ipelets/*.so are now in -devel. - Creation of -doc subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190175] Review Request: p0rn-comfort - Support programs for browsing image-gallery sites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: p0rn-comfort - Support programs for browsing
image-gallery sites
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190175
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-21 14:21 EST ---
H tibbs,
Updated package at http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/p0rn-comfort/
I've incorporated your idea of moving some files out of %{_bindir} and put them
into %{_libexecdir}/%{_name} as decided on IRC.
I also fixed the issue with p0rn-proxy, so it could be checked in.
On IRC you said, you already approved the package, but reading your bugzilla
entry, that's not very clear.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191604] Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191604
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779
nThis||
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-21 14:24 EST ---
Everything looks fine now. rpmlint is fine once you ignore the bugus warning,
requires are fine now, buildrequires are fine and the scriptlets are good. I
also note that you've added a %{?dist} tag.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190129] Review Request: python-krbV
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-krbV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190129 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-21 14:38 EST --- Odd that the tarball is still mode 664, but this definitely won't matter after you import. Otherwise, everything looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191606] Review Request: lineak_kdeplugins - KDE-based actions for lineakd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_kdeplugins - KDE-based actions for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191606 Bug 191606 depends on bug 191604, which changed state. Bug 191604 Summary: Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191604 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191605] Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lineak_defaultplugin - default actions for lineakd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191605 Bug 191605 depends on bug 191604, which changed state. Bug 191604 Summary: Review Request: lineakd - linux easy-access-key daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191604 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192603] New: Review Request: openalpp - Object Oriented version of OpenAL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192603 Summary: Review Request: openalpp - Object Oriented version of OpenAL Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com Spec URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/openalpp.spec SRPM URL: http://tkmame.retrogames.com/fedora-extras/openalpp-20060405-2.src.rpm Description: Written in C++, makes OpenAL so much more accessible. Compare openalpp to a scenegraph for OpenGL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191582] Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191582 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 189892] Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dssi - Disposable Soft Synth Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=189892 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-21 16:22 EST --- Ah, licensing. According to the README, the header is LGPL, and jack-dssi-host is BSD-style. COPYING is included for the header, but everything else seems to have the license in the source code. jack-dssi-host contains: /* * Copyright 2004 Chris Cannam, Steve Harris and Sean Bolton. * * Permission to use, copy, modify, distribute, and sell this software * for any purpose is hereby granted without fee, provided that the * above copyright notice and this permission notice are included in * all copies or substantial portions of the software. */ Does this count as BSD? Everything in the examples directory has something to the effect of This example file is in the public domain. Note that dssi_osc_send and dssi_osc_update are in the main package, which otherwise seems like the right place to me. So, my guess is dssi-devel should be License: LGPL, dssi-examples should be License: Public Domain, and the main package License: BSD/Public Domain however mock complains about that one. Maybe it can just be Distributable. Someone who is knowledgeable in licensing, please take a look at this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191582] Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191582 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-21 16:28 EST --- I'm getting a build error in mock during configure: checking for gcc... gcc checking whether the C compiler (gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fsigned-char -DXF86VIDMODE -lXxf86vm) works... no configure: error: installation or configuration problem: C compiler cannot create executables. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.65804 (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.65804 (%build) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192363] Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: GTS - Gnu Triangulated Surface Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192363 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-21 16:35 EST --- Hi Ralf, I've included your patch (comment #4), added one for gts-config, and imported it into CVS. Please let me know if you see any problems. I'll request builds on FC-4/5 and devel in day or two. And co-maintainership is fine with me -- please feel free to make whatever changes you want to it in CVS at any time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 190129] Review Request: python-krbV
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-krbV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190129 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-21 17:05 EST --- Thanks, built in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192606] New: Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192606
Summary: Review Request: yafc: yet another ftp client
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://rpm.forevermore.net/yafc/yafc.spec
SRPM URL: http://rpm.forevermore.net/yafc/yafc-1.1.1-1.src.rpm
Description:
yafc is Yet Another FTP Client. It is an interactive interface to the FTP
and SFTP protocols.
FEATURES
- cached directory listings
- uses readline (tab completion, emacs/vi editing keys, history file, etc.)
- extensive tab completion
- multiple connections open
- aliases
- colored ls (i.e., ls --color, uses $LS_COLORS like GNU ls)
- autologin and bookmarks
- recursive get/put/rm/ls
- nohup mode get and put
- tagging (queueing) of files for later transferring
- automagically enters nohup-mode when SIGHUP received (in get and put)
- redirection to local command or file ('', '' and '|')
- proxy support
- more...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 192546] Review Request: gnubiff
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnubiff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192546 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-21 17:31 EST --- Ok, i've made the changes. Source : http://glive.tuxfamily.org/fedora/gnubiff/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 191582] Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: xgalaga - Galaga clone for X11
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191582
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-21 19:32 EST ---
* rpmlint output clean
* Package meets Package Naming Guidelines
* Spec filename matches base package %{name}
* Package meets Packaging Guidelines
* Package licensed with open source compatible license
* License in spec matches actual license
* License text included in %doc
* Spec file written in American English
* Spec file is legible
* Sources match upstream
9f7ee685e9c4741b5f0edc3f91df9510 xgalaga_2.0.34.orig.tar.gz
9f7ee685e9c4741b5f0edc3f91df9510 xgalaga_2.0.34.orig.tar.gz
* Package successfully compiles and builds on FC5 x86_64
O Package has all BR except libXxf86vm-devel which I needed to add for it to
compile
* Package does not have any locales
* Package does not contain any shared library files
* Package is not relocatable
* Package owns all directories it creates
* Package does not contain any duplicate files in %files
* File permissions are set properly
* Package contains proper %clean section
* Macro usage consistant enough
- I notice you use %{__sed}, but don't bother using %{__make} or %{__rm} etc..
* Package contains permissble content
* Package does not contain large documentation to warrent a seperate package
* Package does not contain header files, libraries or .pc files
* Package does not contain any .so files
* Package does not require or use a -devel package
* Package does not contain any .la files
* Package adds an appropriate .desktop entry
* Package does not own any files or directories owned by other packages
*** MUST ***
- You MUST figure out why FC5 needs to add a BuildRequires of libXxf86vm-devel
and why this is not needed for your build (presumably FC6)
Non-blocking SHOULDs:
- Be more consistant with macro usage, for example %{__sed}, but no %{__rm} etc.
- I also prefer %{buildroot} instead of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, but that is a matter of
preference. I just think spec files look cleaner when everything consistantly
uses %{} format. So basically I'm saying you should use a clean more legible
consistant style in your spec files, but I'm not going to say this is a blocker
or should be fixed, just a suggestion.
- Let me know that the name xgalaga isn't going to be a problem with Namco.
I've heard the Lgames are not allowed because the names are too close to the
original, is this going to be a problem?
- Return the favor by reviewing some of my packages ;-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 187621] Review Request: blam
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: blam https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187621 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-21 21:03 EST --- (In reply to comment #3) Eeek! Why also the .so files? These are plugin DSOs in %_libdir/blam/ which are local to this application. Oops. Silly me, that isn't a devel file. http://fedorared.org/~john/review/blam-1.8.2-4.src.rpm This version incorporates reenables %find_lang, but it doesn't work, no translations found. Sindre, you're still maintainer when this gets through, srpms are just easy to distribute. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
