[Bug 458345] Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345 --- Comment #11 from Simon Wesp [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 02:44:02 EDT --- Okay One problem remains. i can't build the docs in the %build-Section, because the docs need the builded rabbyt to build.. :-/ this is a problem i can't fix.. SPEC: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/python-rabbyt-0.8.2/python-rabbyt.spec SRPM: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/python-rabbyt-0.8.2/python-rabbyt-0.8.2-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459010] Review request: pystatgrab - Python bindings for libstatgrab
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459010 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 02:47:31 EDT --- Okay, now bug 457926 is in good shape, I will approve this package. --- This package (pystatgrab) is APPROVED by mtasaka Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from Get a Fedora Account. After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466655] Review Request: libfplll - LLL-reduces euclidian lattices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466655 Conrad Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Conrad Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 02:54:36 EDT --- Built in rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 465750] Review Request:R-GeneR - R for genes and sequences analysis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465750 Pierre-YvesChibon [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454439] Review Request: R-nws - R functions for NetWorkSpaces and Sleigh
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454439 Pierre-YvesChibon [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Pierre-YvesChibon [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 03:01:05 EDT --- Then I think this package is good :) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 465750] Review Request:R-GeneR - R for genes and sequences analysis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465750 --- Comment #7 from Pierre-YvesChibon [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 03:03:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: R-GeneR Short Description: R for genes and sequences analysis Owners: pingou Branches: F-8 F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460057] Review Request: openlayers - A JavaScript library for displaying map data
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460057 Balint Cristian [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457926] Review Request: python-wikimarkup - Python module to format text to Mediawiki syntax
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457926
--- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 03:13:27 EDT
---
For -5svn:
Almost okay.
* Versioning of rpm
- Please follow
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages
The EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) of this rpm should be
1.1-X.YYYsvn%{?dist}, for example, where X is fedora specific release
number and YYY is the revision number of svn repository.
* Macros in comments
- For this package there is no problem, however please use
%% (instead of single %) in comments or in %changelog to
prevent macros from being expanded, like
---
# %%{python_sitearch}/*
---
(By the way I think this comment line and the above comment
line can simply be removed).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454851] Review Request: trainingchart : tool to download and log trainings from a garmin device
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454851 Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 03:31:31 EDT --- Please add your request to the wishlist. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #23 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 03:51:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) I just pushed ghc-6.8.3-9.fc10 to koji Please ghc-6.8.3-10.fc10 with a fixed %cabal_configure for ghc-6.8.3. (In reply to comment #22) Erm, did you mean to to set this back to NEW and assign it back to nobody? Oops, sorry - no I didn't - I guess I already had the bug open in my browser. Jason, I didn't mean to steal the review from you, but I was planning on taking it since I am familiar with Haskell packaging and since no package review has yet been through the new haskell guidelines I might be better placed to do this one? But if you want to take it I won't stand in your way. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 --- Comment #24 from Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 03:54:43 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=321249) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=321249) ghc-zlib.spec-1.patch A bit of cleanup/simplification and make it build with ghc-6.8.3 in current rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 425882] Review Request: ghc-zlib - zlib bindings for ghc
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=425882 Jens Petersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459675] Review Request: python-sybase - new package request
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459675
--- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 03:53:22 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #10)
The RPM *does* definitely work for me. It installs an egg file instead of
sybasect.so. and Sybase.py.
After reading https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs
it seems that Fedora allows this case. Then
* As dlopened module sybasect.so is in zipped egg file, debuginfo file
is not created.
Please follow
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo#Useless_or_incomplete_debuginfo_packages_due_to_other_reasons
---
use %define debug_package %{nil} in the specfile, and be sure
to add a comment next to it explaining why it was done.
---
I'm removing site.py, site.pyc, and site.pyo because these files already exist
(from python-setuptools).
Okay.
I see what you mean about the .csvignore and pstumble, but I can't figure out
how to do anything about it. The %{_doc} directory in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT doesn't
exist yet in the %install section.
%doc LICENCE ChangeLog doc examples installs these files.
Just
%setup -q
chmod 0644 doc/pstumble
rm -f doc/.cvsignore
will suppress rpmlint error/warnings
By the way I am also waiting for your another review request submission
or a pre-review of other person's review request.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 Peter Lemenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 04:03:10 EDT --- I'm sorry, Rakesh, but I can't go further (at least until I'll find a box with F-10 installed). I'm releasing my fedora-review flags. If nobody will review this package, I'll restart the review process, but only after I'll update my working machine to F-10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460959] Review Request: libkml - A KML library written in C++ with bindings to other languagues
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460959 Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #11 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 04:18:37 EDT --- No worries. I will wait for your update. In the meantime, if I can find someone then very good. I hope you will update your box soon. ;-) Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467001] Review Request: litmus - WebDAV Test Suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467001 --- Comment #4 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 04:31:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Updated with SSL: http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/litmus.spec http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/litmus-0.12-1.fc9.src.rpm As far as the simpler spec in bug 467856, it looks like even though he included neon-devel, it was still building against neon included in the source. My patch and other changes are specifically to get it to build against the distro supplied neon. [cascavel:~/redhat/SOURCES/litmus-0.12] configure --help | grep neon --with-included-neonforce use of included neon library --with-neon[=DIR] specify location of neon library It seems to me that the default is using an external neon ... configure --with-ssl=openssl configure: Configured to build litmus 0.12: Install prefix: /usr/local Compiler:gcc neon library:library in /usr (0.27.2) XML parser: using whatever neon uses SSL library: SSL is supported by neon Everything was detected correctly, on F8, without any patch. But ssl is not necessary, since neon provides it. make .. gcc -o basic src/basic.o -L. -ltest -lneon gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./lib -I./src -I./test-common -g -O2 -I/usr/include/neon -c src/copymove.c -o src/copymove.o gcc -o copymove src/copymove.o -L. -ltest -lneon gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./lib -I./src -I./test-common -g -O2 -I/usr/include/neon -c src/props.c -o src/props.o gcc -o props src/props.o -L. -ltest -lneon gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./lib -I./src -I./test-common -g -O2 -I/usr/include/neon -c src/locks.c -o src/locks.o gcc -o locks src/locks.o -L. -ltest -lneon gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./lib -I./src -I./test-common -g -O2 -I/usr/include/neon -c src/http.c -o src/http.o gcc -o http src/http.o -L. -ltest -lneon Now run: make URL=http://dav.server/path/ check or make URL=http://dav.server/path/ CREDS=uname passwd check -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225243] Merge Review: amanda
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225243 --- Comment #16 from Daniel Novotny [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 04:55:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) (In reply to comment #11) I'm missing a trailing || : in the %pre client script: %pre client # when upgrading, move /etc/amandates to /var/lib/amanda/amandates [ -f /etc/amandates ] mv /etc/amandates /var/lib/amanda/amandates || : This still needs to get fixed. I would, but ACLs prevent me. OK, fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454020] Review Request: tcl-zlib - Tcl extension for zlib support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454020 Marcela Maslanova [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 04:52:15 EDT --- FAIL source files match upstream: can't download from svn without account OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field MIT matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. FAIL latest version is being packaged. can't say OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. tcl-zlib-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation, but that's ok. No documentation at all provided. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. How can I check the source? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466777] Review Request: perl-Satcon - Framework for configuration files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466777 --- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 04:54:39 EDT --- Is 1.6 an actual release? Because that doesn't seem to make sense when the only way to get it is to check it out of git. Yeah, perl-Satcon-1.6-1 is last release. See http://miroslav.suchy.cz/spacewalk/gitstat/tag.php for list of recent tags. You need to provide instructions for actually checking the packaged version out of git, not just what's currently at the head of the tree. I did. See this comment inside spec: # This src.rpm is cannonical upstream # You can obtain it using this set of commands # git clone git://git.fedorahosted.org/git/spacewalk.git/ # cd projects/perl-Satcon # make srpm The provided Makefile will checkout the git to the tag perl-Satcon-1.6-1 (commits after this tag are ignored) and make srpm from that version. I know you probably depend on the names now, but is there really any point in postfixing the executable names with .pl? You know... I did not write that code. I just take the code as is and try to include it in Fedora. The code is several years old. And yeah, several thing we are doing different today. But it works, and I'm trying to as little as possible, during review. I note this package provides perl(Satcon) = 1.3, which is... odd. The module version differs from the package version? Yeah there was hardcoded version in module. I removed it: Updated SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-Satcon/perl-Satcon.spec Updated SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/perl-Satcon/perl-Satcon-1.7-1.f10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226217] Merge Review: opensp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226217 Ondrej Vasik [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||opensp-1.5.2-9.fc10 Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Ondrej Vasik [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 04:57:14 EDT --- Fixed in opensp-1.5.2-9.fc10, I will ignore last remaining rpmlint warning about missing doc files in opensp-devel subpackage as the documentation is in main opensp package. Closing RAWHIDE, thanks again for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468155] New: Review Request: robodoc - Extract documentation from source code
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: robodoc - Extract documentation from source code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468155 Summary: Review Request: robodoc - Extract documentation from source code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/robodoc.spec SRPM URL: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/robodoc-4.99.36-1.fc8.src.rpm Description: ROBODoc is a documentation tool (based on the AutoDocs program written a long time ago by Commodore). It extracts specially formated comment headers from the source file and puts them in a separate file. ROBODoc thus allows you to include the program documentation in the source code and avoid having to maintain two separate documents. ROBODoc can format the documentation in HTML, ASCII, AmigaGuide, LaTeX, or RTF format. It is even possible to include parts of the source code with function names that point their the documentation. It also can create index tables for all your variables, classes, functions, etc. The best feature of ROBODoc is that it works with many languages: Assembler, C, Perl, LISP, Occam, Tcl/Tk, Pascal, Fortran, shell scripts, and COBOL, basically any language that supports comments/remarks. rpmlint is silent. koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=897383 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468120] Review Request: sugar-implode - Implode for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468120 Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468116] Review Request: sugar-analyze - Analysing tool for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468116 Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||462625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467347] Review Request: rubygem-picnic - Easier distribution of Camping based applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467347 S.A. Hartsuiker [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467943] Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 --- Comment #16 from Jaroslav Reznik [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 06:55:20 EDT --- From now Solar artwork is dual licensed CC-BY-SA and GPLv2+. So we should dual license it too. Artwork as CC-BY-SA and code for themes as GPLv2+. I've just solved bug with repainting and colours for userlist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459893] Review Request: rubygem-pervasives - Access to pristine object state
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459893 S.A. Hartsuiker [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467347] Review Request: rubygem-picnic - Easier distribution of Camping based applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467347 --- Comment #2 from S.A. Hartsuiker [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 07:04:25 EDT --- RPM Lint: clean Package name: ok Spec file: ok License: GPLv2+ or Ruby Actual License: LGPLv3 %doc License: LICENSE.txt Spec file language: ok Spec file readable:ok Upstream source vs. used tarball: ok (md5: cdeb6aeb70947e3f7149dfc1b4897c45) Compile and Build: - F-8: ok - F-9: ok - F-10 ok - rawhide: ok - EL-5: n/a Applicable Package Guidelines: ok Locales: n/a Shared libs: n/a Relocatable: no Directory and file ownership: ok No duplicate files in %files: ok File Permissions: ok Macro usage: ok Code vs. Content: ok (Large) Documentation: n/a %doc affecting runtime: ok Header files in -devel package: n/a Static Libraries in -static package: n/a pkgconfig Requires: n/a Library files: n/a Devel requires base package: n/a .la libtool archives: n/a Duplicate ownership of files/directories: ok Remove BuildRoot: ok UTF-8 filenames: ok Fix the license tag please, otherwise this package is ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459893] Review Request: rubygem-pervasives - Access to pristine object state
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459893 --- Comment #2 from S.A. Hartsuiker [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 07:21:21 EDT --- RPM Lint: clean Package name: ok Spec file: ok License: GPLv2+ or Ruby Actual License: Ruby (see http://codeforpeople.com/lib/license.txt) %doc License: LICENSE.txt Spec file language: ok Spec file readable:ok Upstream source vs. used tarball: ok (md5: cdeb6aeb70947e3f7149dfc1b4897c45) Compile and Build: - F-8: ok - F-9: ok - F-10 ok - rawhide: ok - EL-5: n/a Applicable Package Guidelines: ok Locales: n/a Shared libs: n/a Relocatable: no Directory and file ownership: ok No duplicate files in %files: ok File Permissions: ok Macro usage: ok Code vs. Content: ok (Large) Documentation: n/a %doc affecting runtime: ok Header files in -devel package: n/a Static Libraries in -static package: n/a pkgconfig Requires: n/a Library files: n/a Devel requires base package: n/a .la libtool archives: n/a Duplicate ownership of files/directories: ok Remove BuildRoot: ok UTF-8 filenames: ok Fix the license tag please, otherwise this package is ok. Spec file linked above does not match the spec used to build the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466997] Review Request: sl - Joke command for when you type 'sl' instead of 'ls'
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466997 Marc Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] | |aw.co.uk) | --- Comment #10 from Marc Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 07:57:54 EDT --- apologies, should be able to get something up this coming weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467530] Review Request: ladvd - CDP/LLDP sender for unix
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467530 Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 08:23:50 EDT --- Actually, he can't approve yet, as he's not sponsored himself, but once he is (as I am hoping to do), can can. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467530] Review Request: ladvd - CDP/LLDP sender for unix
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467530 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Thienemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 08:29:33 EDT --- I suspected something as I didn't found him in FAS, thus the addition of any regular packager. :-) So, thanks in advance for sponsoring him then... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453412] Review Request: gtk-aurora-engine - Aurora theme engine for gtk2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453412 --- Comment #4 from Tuomas Mursu [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 08:41:25 EDT --- Well well, it didn't take that long. I changed %prep too so that everything stays under one directory. Spec URL: http://koti.kapsi.fi/~darkon/rpm/rev/gtk-aurora-engine/1/gtk-aurora-engine.spec SRPM URL: http://koti.kapsi.fi/~darkon/rpm/rev/gtk-aurora-engine/1/gtk-aurora-engine-1.4-1.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460000] Review Request: rxtx - Parallel communication for the Java Development Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=46 --- Comment #20 from Levente Farkas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 08:45:52 EDT --- build it, and in the pending queue and in the epel need-signing queue too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226212] Merge Review: OpenIPMI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226212 --- Comment #6 from Jan Safranek [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 08:57:51 EDT --- 1-4) patch applied, thanks 5) the gui does not start because of bug #467224 6) done 7) yes, it can run as regular user, e.g. to manage remote box over IP 8) fixed Look for OpenIPMI-2.0.14-5.fc10, available at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=67224 or in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 09:08:41 EDT --- We now are at rc3 (no stable yet). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435016] Review Request: mmdb - MMDB coordinate library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435016 --- Comment #16 from Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 09:15:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) I would argue that according to the COPYING file, the License: should be LGPLv2 with exceptions but spot above says LGPLv2. I'll double check with spot tomorrow. Yeah, this is right, it should be LGPLv2 with exceptions. Not sure why I thought differently before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467001] Review Request: litmus - WebDAV Test Suite
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467001 --- Comment #5 from John Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 09:20:34 EDT --- My mistake, you're right. Removed patch. http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/litmus.spec http://transfer.eragen.com/rpm/litmus-0.12-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454439] Review Request: R-nws - R functions for NetWorkSpaces and Sleigh
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454439 Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 09:28:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: R-nws Short Description: R functions for NetWorkSpaces and Sleigh Owners: spot Branches: F-8 F-9 devel EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467943] Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 --- Comment #17 from Jaroslav Reznik [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 09:35:33 EDT --- Update for testing purposes only! Spec URL: http://jreznik.fedorapeople.org/kde/f10/solar-kde-theme/solar-kde-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://jreznik.fedorapeople.org/kde/f10/solar-kde-theme/solar-kde-theme-0.1.4-1.fc9.src.rpm DONE: - KDM theme (input backgrounds disappear a little later, bug?) - backgrounds - licenses TBD: - move fedora logo to fedora-logos, generic logo - default face icon (how-to link it?) - shared backgrounds for KDM, KSplash Plasma -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460000] Review Request: rxtx - Parallel communication for the Java Development Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=46 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 09:32:00 EDT --- Okay, thanks. Now closing. If you have some questions please feel free to mail to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 --- Comment #17 from Thomas Moschny [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 09:41:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) We now are at rc3 (no stable yet). I know, and I already did some more work on that package, see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=895060 - however need to find out why it fails on ppc64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454441] Review Request: R-bigmemory - Manage massive matrices in R using C++, with support for shared memory
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454441 Bug 454441 depends on bug 454439, which changed state. Bug 454439 Summary: Review Request: R-nws - R functions for NetWorkSpaces and Sleigh https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454439 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454439] Review Request: R-nws - R functions for NetWorkSpaces and Sleigh
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454439 Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 10:23:53 EDT --- Built in rawhide, and updates are coming for F-8 and F-9. thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454439] Review Request: R-nws - R functions for NetWorkSpaces and Sleigh
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454439 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 10:32:18 EDT --- R-nws-1.7.0.0-1.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-nws-1.7.0.0-1.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454439] Review Request: R-nws - R functions for NetWorkSpaces and Sleigh
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454439 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 10:32:22 EDT --- R-nws-1.7.0.0-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-nws-1.7.0.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] New: Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Summary: Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear.spec SRPM URL: http://home.scarlet.be/gdha/rear-1.7.7-1.src.rpm Description: Relax and Recover (abbreviated rear) is a highly modular disaster recovery framework for GNU/Linux based systems, but can be easily extended to other UNIX alike systems. The disaster recovery information (and maybe the backups) can be stored via the network, local on hard disks or USB devices, DVD/CD-R, tape, etc. The result is also a bootable image that is capable of booting via PXE, DVD/CD and tape (OBDR). It works out of the box and Fedora and RHEL releases (x86, x86_64 and ia64 tested). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 --- Comment #1 from Gratien D'haese [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 10:42:02 EDT --- Main web-site is http://rear.sourceforge.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454102] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Model-XMLRPC - XMLRPC model class for Catalyst
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454102 Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 10:52:33 EDT --- Imported and built in devel. Thanks for the review! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 10:54:51 EDT --- Strangely enough, now it builds on F-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=898121 but not in F-9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=898151 dist-f9-build jna is now jna-3.0.2-7.fc9, while this package requires: BuildRequires: jna = 3.0.3. So would you fix rpm versioning issue, commenting how to create tarball (as I noted on comment 17) and update your srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226217] Merge Review: opensp
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226217 --- Comment #9 from Ville Skyttä [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 10:53:01 EDT --- The conversion should not be done in %build because that will result it being done multiple times and thus in corrupted result when doing multiple successive --short-circuit builds. %prep would be the proper place to do it (I'll update rpmlint's message to reflect that). Also, there's little reason to convert HTML files that have the correct encoding in their meta info - HTML files are opened with browsers that should grok the encoding just fine. This is the reason why rpmlint does not complain about HTML (and some other) files' encodings even when they're not UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468197] New: Review Request: v4l2ucp - Video4linux universal control panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: v4l2ucp - Video4linux universal control panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468197 Summary: Review Request: v4l2ucp - Video4linux universal control panel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/v4l2ucp.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/v4l2ucp-1.2-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: v4l2 is a control panel for video4linux2 devices, it reads a description of the controls that the V4L2 device supports from the device, and presents the user with a graphical means for adjusting those controls. It allows for controlling multiple devices. Controls can be updated with the device status either manually, or periodically and there is an easy way to reset one or all the controls to their default state. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467943] Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 --- Comment #18 from Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 10:57:29 EDT --- Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=897896 Looks real good here. I don't see any remaining blockers, wolfy? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467943] Review Request: kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE Theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 manuel wolfshant [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from manuel wolfshant [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 11:23:03 EDT --- No blockers in a fast-forward review. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467943] Review Request: solar-kde-theme - Solar KDE Theme
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467943 Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |kde-solar-theme - Solar KDE |solar-kde-theme - Solar KDE |Theme |Theme Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Rex Dieter [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 11:31:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: solar-kde-theme Short Description: Solar KDE theme Owners: jreznik,than,ltinkl,kkofler,rdieter Branches: F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468197] Review Request: v4l2ucp - Video4linux universal control panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468197
Jon Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Jon Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 11:33:28 EDT ---
OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
N/A - Package needs ExcludeArch
OK - BuildRequires correct
N/A - Spec handles locales/find_lang
N/A - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Package has correct buildroot
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
N/A - Doc subpackage needed/used.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
N/A - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
N/A - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
N/A - .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig
N/A - .so files in -devel subpackage.
N/A - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
N/A - .la files are removed.
OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
N/A - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - No rpmlint output.
OK - final provides and requires are sane:
(include output of for i in *rpm; do echo $i; rpm -qp --provides $i; echo =;
rpm -qp --requires $i; echo; done
manually indented after checking each line. I also remove the rpmlib junk and
anything provided by glibc.)
SHOULD Items:
OK - Should build in mock.
OK - Should build on all supported archs
N/A - Should function as described.
OK - Should have sane scriptlets.
OK - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend.
OK - Should have dist tag
OK - Should package latest version
N/A - check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge reviews)
As noted on IRC, the category in the spec is a little off, but not a blocker.
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468197] Review Request: v4l2ucp - Video4linux universal control panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468197 --- Comment #1 from Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 11:33:01 EDT --- New version with minor fixes: * Thu Oct 23 2008 Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED] 1.2-2 - Fix the rpm group - Add a comment about the source of the icon we're using Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/v4l2ucp.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/v4l2ucp-1.2-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #16 from Robin Norwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 11:38:41 EDT --- As far as item #2 in comment #14 goes, I think the standard practice for things like sample code is to make it non-executable and mark it as documentation. If you want to I can make this change for cerebroui when we resubmit cerebro. For item #3, yes, the license tag was set to GPLv3+ because of demjson.py - I think the license tag is correct. Since that file is GPLv3+, we can distribute cerebro as GPLv3+, but not as GPLv2+. The 'more restrictive' (GPLv3+) license wins. As a matter of clarity, the LICENSE file should probably be changed to match GPLv3+, but I don't think that's usually required to pass package review. I could be mistaken, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 11:45:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) Strangely enough, now it builds on F-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=898121 Oops!! the correct URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=898070 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466379] Review Request: zfs-fuse - ZFS ported to Linux FUSE
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466379 --- Comment #5 from Denis Leroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 11:56:44 EDT --- I'm being told to look at the patent CDDL FAQ: Q. What does the CDDL say about patents? The CDDL provides an explicit patent license for code released under the license. This means that you can use, modify, and redistribute code released under CDDL without worrying about any patents that the contributors of the code (including Sun) might have on the contributed technology. The license also includes a provision to discourage patent litigation against developers by revoking the rights to the code for anyone initiating a patent claim against a developer regarding code they have contributed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468197] Review Request: v4l2ucp - Video4linux universal control panel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468197 Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 12:25:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: v4l2ucp Short Description: Video4linux universal control panel Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||468055 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 449869] Review Request: tasque - A simple task management app
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449869 Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 12:26:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) Okay, then would you tell me what $ rpm -q gtk-sharp2 return? Don't worry. Now F-9 buildroot is fixed by Xavier (bug 468055). Now: + This package itself is now okay + You seem to have chosen almost good package for your pre-review, however I will approve it. -- This package (tasque) is APPROVED by mtasaka -- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from Install the Client Tools (Koji) . Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 8/9, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). Removing NEEDSPONSOR. If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468222] New: Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468222 Summary: Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-transaction.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-transaction-1.0-0.1.a1.fc9.src.rpm Description: This package contains a generic transaction implementation for Python. It is mainly used by the ZODB, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468222] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468222 Luke Macken [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||468223 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466648] Review Request: dnstracer - Trace a DNS record to its start of authority
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466648 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 12:35:32 EDT --- dnstracer-1.9-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468223] Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468223 Luke Macken [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||468222 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468226] New: Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 Summary: Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tw-jquery.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tw-jquery-0.9.1-0.1.dev20081021.fc9.src.rpm Description: ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468224] New: Review Request: python-zope-sqlalchemy - Minimal Zope/SQLAlchemy transaction integration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-zope-sqlalchemy - Minimal Zope/SQLAlchemy transaction integration https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468224 Summary: Review Request: python-zope-sqlalchemy - Minimal Zope/SQLAlchemy transaction integration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-zope-sqlalchemy.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-zope-sqlalchemy-0.3-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: The aim of this package is to unify the plethora of existing packages integrating SQLAlchemy with Zope's transaction management. As such it seeks only to provide a data manager and makes no attempt to define a zopeish way to configure engines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468223] New: Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468223 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-tm2.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-tm2-1.0-0.1.a3.fc9.src.rpm Description: The ZODB transaction manager is a completely generic transaction manager. It can be used independently of the actual object database part of ZODB. One of the purposes of creating repoze.tm was to allow for systems other than Zope to make use of two-phase commit transactions in a WSGI context. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454014] Review Request: tcl-tclvfs - Tcl extension for Virtual Filesystem support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454014 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 12:35:28 EDT --- tcl-tclvfs-20080503-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466648] Review Request: dnstracer - Trace a DNS record to its start of authority
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466648 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458345] Review Request: python-rabbyt - sprite library for Python with game development in mind
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458345
--- Comment #12 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23
12:34:41 EDT ---
Great,
* But I was able to build the docs when I moved the line
cd docs; PYTHONPATH=%{buildroot}%{python_sitearch} %{__python} make_docs.py;cd
..
to right after the setup.py build in the %build section. What was wrong in
your case?
* When you are commenting out a line that has a macro make sure you use %%
instead of a single %, so that the macro doesn't expand out. (e.g. in the
%check section)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #17 from Rakesh Pandit [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 12:40:27 EDT --- @Robin You are correct, regarding license. - Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454012] Review Request: tcl-tcludp - Tcl extension for UDP support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454012 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 12:36:34 EDT --- tcl-tcludp-1.0.8-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454012] Review Request: tcl-tcludp - Tcl extension for UDP support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454012 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 12:37:01 EDT --- tcl-tcludp-1.0.8-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454014] Review Request: tcl-tclvfs - Tcl extension for Virtual Filesystem support
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454014 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 12:37:22 EDT --- tcl-tclvfs-20080503-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468229] Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468229 --- Comment #1 from Luke Macken [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 12:41:57 EDT --- Note: this package is only needed on EL-4 and EL-5, as the 'wsgiref' module is now in the Python 2.5 stdlib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454017] Review Request: tcl-tileqt - QT widget support for Tile Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454017 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 12:41:34 EDT --- tcl-tileqt-0.4-0.2.b1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454017] Review Request: tcl-tileqt - QT widget support for Tile Toolkit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454017 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 12:40:25 EDT --- tcl-tileqt-0.4-0.2.b1.fc8.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466648] Review Request: dnstracer - Trace a DNS record to its start of authority
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466648 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 12:37:36 EDT --- dnstracer-1.9-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 12:41:46 EDT --- perl-Net-Daemon-0.44-5.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Net-Daemon'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-9098 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468229] New: Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468229 Summary: Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-wsgiref.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-wsgiref-0.1.2-1.el5.noarch.rpm Description: WebError is WSGI middleware that performs error handling and exception catching. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468228] New: Review Request: python-tg-ext-repoze-who - repoze.who plugins for TurboGears2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-tg-ext-repoze-who - repoze.who plugins for TurboGears2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468228 Summary: Review Request: python-tg-ext-repoze-who - repoze.who plugins for TurboGears2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tg-ext-repoze-who.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tg-ext-repoze-who-0.1-0.1.r26.fc9.src.rpm Description: Sample repoze.who middleware config and plugins for TG2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468227] New: Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-who.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-who-1.0.7-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: repoze.who is an identification and authentication framework for arbitrary WSGI applications. It acts as WSGI middleware. repoze.who is inspired by Zope 2's Pluggable Authentication Service (PAS) (but repoze.who is not dependent on Zope in any way; it is useful for any WSGI application). It provides no facility for authorization (ensuring whether a user can or cannot perform the operation implied by the request). This is considered to be the domain of the WSGI application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468230] New: Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Summary: Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED] QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/TurboGears2.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/TurboGears2-1.9.7-0.1.a5dev.5564.fc9.src.rpm Description: TurboGears2, provides a comprehensive web development toolkit. It is designed to help you create the basic outline of a database-driven web application in minutes. TurboGears provides you with sane default for designer friendly templates, tools to make AJAX, and dynamic Javascript driven pages easy on both the browser side and the server side. TurboGears is a project that is built upon a foundation of reuse and building up. In retrospect, much of the code that was home grown in the TurboGears project should have been released as independent projects that integrate with TurboGears. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468222] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468222 Luke Macken [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||468230 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468228] Review Request: python-tg-ext-repoze-who - repoze.who plugins for TurboGears2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468228 Luke Macken [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||468230 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468224] Review Request: python-zope-sqlalchemy - Minimal Zope/SQLAlchemy transaction integration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468224 Luke Macken [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||468230 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 Luke Macken [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||468230 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468223] Review Request: python-repoze-tm2 - Zope-like transaction manager via WSGI middleware
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468223 Luke Macken [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||468230 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Luke Macken [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||468223, 468222, 468224, ||468228, 468227 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468228] Review Request: python-tg-ext-repoze-who - repoze.who plugins for TurboGears2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468228 Luke Macken [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||468227 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 Luke Macken [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||468228 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455426] Review Request: gstreamer-java - Java interface to the gstreamer framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455426 --- Comment #20 from Levente Farkas [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-23 12:52:19 EDT --- here is the latest'n'greatest version: http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/fedora/9/SPECS/gstreamer-java.spec http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/fedora/9/SRPMS/gstreamer-java-0.9-0.1.20081023hg.fc9.src.rpm here are the successful builds: f-10, f-11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=898288 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=898291 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468222] Review Request: python-transaction - Transaction management for Python
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468222 Luke Macken [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|468230 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468229] Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468229 Luke Macken [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||468230 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 Luke Macken [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|468230 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Luke Macken [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|468222, 468227 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Luke Macken [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||468229 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
