[Bug 458598] Review Request: snowballz - a fun RTS game featuring snowball fights with penguins

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458598





--- Comment #7 from Hans de Goede [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 05:21:09 EDT 
---
(In reply to comment #6)
 I'm not sure Hans. I talked to the main avbin developer, who is also the main
 pyglet developer. He doesn't want to work on such issues. But he says he would
 accept patches.

If he will accept patches (to pyglet) to support .ogg using other means then
avbin, then clearly the right way to proceed with this is to do this in Fedora,
and write a patch for pyglet to support ogg/vorbis audio playback. Similar work
has been done for many other games in Fedora.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472027] New: Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027

   Summary: Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/onboard.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/onboard-0.91.2-1.fc9.src.rpm

Project URL: https://launchpad.net/onboard/

Description:
An on-screen keyboard useful on tablet PCs or for mobility impaired users.

Koji scratch builds:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=937698

rpmlint output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] noarch]$ rpmlint onb*
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS]$ rpmlint onb*
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

This package does not contain translation at the moment because I'm not able to
integrate those.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467643] Review Request: sugar-speak - Speak for Sugar

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467643


Bryan Kearney [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Flag||fedora-review?




--- Comment #1 from Bryan Kearney [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 08:57:44 EDT 
---
See items below:

 OK - Package name
  XX - License info is accurate
License is GPLv3

  OK - License tag is correct and licenses are approved
  OK - License files are installed as %doc
  OK - Specfile name
  OK - Specfile is legible
  OK - No prebuilt binaries included
  OK - BuildRoot value (one of the recommended values)
  OK - PreReq not used
  ?? - Source md5sum matches upstream
- Barring a release from upstream, can you export the source code usig the
fixed snapshot url
(http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=activities/speak;a=snapshot;h=f76cea50b0fdee97e92ce94ac379155d6f8d52ac)

  OK - No hardcoded pathnames
  OK - Package owns all the files it installs
  OK - 'Requires' create needed unowned directories
  OK - BuildRequires sufficient
  OK - File permissions set properly
  OK - Macro usage is consistent
  ?? - rpmlint is silent

- rpmlint on the srpm shows this (the last 3 are worriesome)
sugar-maze.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities
sugar-maze.src: W: strange-permission sugar-maze-checkout.sh 0755
sugar-maze.src: W: strange-permission Maze-6.tar.bz2 0755
sugar-maze.src: W: strange-permission sugar-maze.spec 0755

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 463768] Package review: perl-PAR

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463768


Marcela Maslanova [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Keywords||Reopened
 Status|CLOSED  |ASSIGNED
 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |
   Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 09:25:20 
EDT ---
Please add branch for F-9.

New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: perl-PAR
Short Description: Perl Archives - special zip files
Owners: mmaslano
Branches: F-9
InitialCC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 457517] Review Request: perl-Padre - Perl Application Development and Refactoring Environment

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457517


Bug 457517 depends on bug 463768, which changed state.

Bug 463768 Summary: Package review: perl-PAR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463768

   What|Old Value   |New Value

 Status|CLOSED  |ASSIGNED
 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 469673] Review request: perl-File-ShareDir-PAR - same functionality as File::ShareDir with PAR support

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469673





--- Comment #6 from Marcela Maslanova [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 10:08:41 
EDT ---
Please see new version 
http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-File-ShareDir-PAR/perl-File-ShareDir-PAR-0.02-2.fc10.src.rpm
http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/perl-File-ShareDir-PAR/perl-File-ShareDir-PAR.spec

I apologize for wrong format. I was using what firefox offers in history :(

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 469673] Review request: perl-File-ShareDir-PAR - same functionality as File::ShareDir with PAR support

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469673


Stepan Kasal [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Comment #7 from Stepan Kasal [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 10:17:12 EDT 
---
The above changes has been incorporated, except the sed command patching
File/ShareDir/PAR.pm, which really belongs upstream, not to the patch.

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472060] New: Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification system for gnome

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472060

   Summary: Review Request: mumbles - growl like notification
system for gnome
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/115301/mumbles.spec
SRPM URL: http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/115301/mumbles-0.4-1.fc9.src.rpm

Description: Mumbles is a plugin driven, DBus based notification system written
for the Gnome desktop. Similar to libnotify notifications and Growl for OSX,
mumbles aims to provide a modern notification system for the GNU/Linux Desktop.

I'd like to point out ahead of time there are two errors about scripts being
non-executable in rpmlint. I believe those scripts have the shebang for unit
test reasons and are not actually intended to be run, so I've left them as is.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472066] New: Review Request: python-distutils-extra - Integrate more support into Python's distutils

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: python-distutils-extra - Integrate more support into 
Python's distutils

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472066

   Summary: Review Request: python-distutils-extra - Integrate
more support into Python's distutils
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL:
http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-distutils-extra.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-distutils-extra-1.91.2-1.fc9.src.rpm

Project URL: https://launchpad.net/python-distutils-extra

Description:
It allows you to easily integrate gettext, themed icons and GNOME
documentation into your build and installation process. 

Koji scratch builds:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=938072 

rpmlint output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] noarch]$ rpmlint python-*
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-*
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472071] Review Request: sugar-paint : Paint (Draw) Activity for Sugar

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472071


Bryan Kearney [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||462625




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472071] New: Review Request: sugar-paint : Paint (Draw) Activity for Sugar

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: sugar-paint : Paint (Draw) Activity for Sugar

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472071

   Summary: Review Request: sugar-paint : Paint (Draw) Activity
for Sugar
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/sugar-paint.spec
SRPM URL: http://bkearney.fedorapeople.org/sugar-paint-23-1.fc9.src.rpm
Description: Draw activity for Sugar. This is the first package I have done
compiling C Code. Please review the use of make.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472072] New: Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily 
overriding subroutines

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472072

   Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for
easily overriding subroutines
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Sub-Override.spec
SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Sub-Override-0.08-1.fc9.src.rpm
Description: Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines.

This is one of several requirements for perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472079] New: Review Request: perl-Regexp-Copy - Copy Regexp objects

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Regexp-Copy - Copy Regexp objects

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472079

   Summary: Review Request: perl-Regexp-Copy - Copy Regexp objects
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Regexp-Copy.spec
SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Regexp-Copy-0.06-1.fc9.src.rpm
Description: Regexp::Copy allows you to copy the contents of one Regexp object
to another. 

This is one of several requirements for perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472083] New: Review Request: perl-boolean - Boolean support for Perl

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: perl-boolean - Boolean support for Perl

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472083

   Summary: Review Request: perl-boolean - Boolean support for
Perl
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-boolean.spec
SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-boolean-0.20-1.fc9.src.rpm
Description: Most programming languages have a native Boolean data type. Perl
does not.

This is one of several requirements for perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 193271] Review Request: python-dns - DNS toolkit for Python

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193271


Jeffrey C. Ollie [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 455581] Review Request: php-pecl-ssh2 - php bindings to the functions of libssh2

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455581


Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Flag||fedora-review+




--- Comment #7 from Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 11:55:58 EDT ---
The code is explicitly licensed under 2.01 of the PHP License, which indicates
that it can be used under the terms of that license or any future version of
this license.

Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (PHP); make test
passes cleanly.  Package complies with PHP-specific guidelines.

Koji scratch build looks good.

Sources match upstream:

95bdbd6a9a0d14cb65c6d6bdc9ee1770  ssh2-0.10.tgz
95bdbd6a9a0d14cb65c6d6bdc9ee1770  ssh2-0.10.tgz.srpm

Final provides/requires looks sane:

** php-pecl-ssh2-0.10-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm
== rpmlint
== provides
config(php-pecl-ssh2) = 0.10-2.fc11
php-pecl(ssh2) = 0.10
ssh2.so()(64bit)  
php-pecl-ssh2 = 0.10-2.fc11
php-pecl-ssh2(x86-64) = 0.10-2.fc11
== requires
/bin/sh  
/bin/sh  
/usr/bin/pecl  
/usr/bin/pecl  
config(php-pecl-ssh2) = 0.10-2.fc11
libc.so.6()(64bit)  
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)  
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)  
libssh2.so.1()(64bit)  
php(api) = 20041225
php(zend-abi) = 20060613
rtld(GNU_HASH)  
** php-pecl-ssh2-debuginfo-0.10-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm
== rpmlint
== provides
php-pecl-ssh2-debuginfo = 0.10-2.fc11
php-pecl-ssh2-debuginfo(x86-64) = 0.10-2.fc11
== requires

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472085] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-Tiny - Lightweight, dependency free HTML/XML generation

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Tiny - Lightweight, dependency free HTML/XML 
generation

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472085

   Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Tiny - Lightweight,
dependency free HTML/XML generation
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-HTML-Tiny.spec
SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-HTML-Tiny-1.03-1.fc9.src.rpm
Description: 
HTML::Tiny is a simple, dependency free module for generating HTML (and
XML). It concentrates on generating syntactically correct XHTML using a
simple Perl notation.

This is one of several requirements for perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472083] Review Request: perl-boolean - Boolean support for Perl

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472083


Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-review?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472079] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Copy - Copy Regexp objects

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472079


Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-review?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472072] Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472072


Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-review?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472083] Review Request: perl-boolean - Boolean support for Perl

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472083


Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Alias||perl-boolean




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472072] Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472072


Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Alias||perl-Sub-Override




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472079] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Copy - Copy Regexp objects

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472079


Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Alias||perl-Regexp-Copy




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 469969] Review Request: Tao Framework - C# bindings for many different libraries

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469969





--- Comment #3 from David Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 12:18:10 EDT 
---
as libglfw-devel is not available in F10 yet I can't complete the mock build
required for the review just yet. I am also leaving for Brazil on the 22th of
November and won't be home till the 18th of December so if you need this
completed before then you will have to seek someone else to complete the
review. I would suggest someone like spot who tends to be through in his
reviews.

Right now though, you can start by renaming the documentation package to doc to
keep in line with the rest of Fedora. I also wonder if the examples wouldn't
fit nicely in the doc package as well, I don't remember what the norm is here
but I would think that example code would be a pristine form of documentation.

You also alter the build system quite a bit, do you have a bug with upstream to
track this, as well as the libdir stuff? It would be nice to not have to do
that, admittedly cool looking, hackaround.

rpmlint sayth:

taoframework.src: E: invalid-spec-name
taoframework.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 3, tab: line 1)

taoframework.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/taoframework-2.1.0/INSTALL
taoframework.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/taoframework-2.1.0/COPYING
taoframework-examples.x86_64: W: uncompressed-zip
/usr/share/tao/examples/Data/PhysFsExamples.Simple.MyZip.zip

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 455581] Review Request: php-pecl-ssh2 - php bindings to the functions of libssh2

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455581


Itamar Reis Peixoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 455581] Review Request: php-pecl-ssh2 - php bindings to the functions of libssh2

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455581





--- Comment #8 from Itamar Reis Peixoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 
13:13:07 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: php-pecl-ssh2
Short Description: Bindings to the functions of libssh2 which implements the
SSH2 protocol
Owners: itamarjp
Branches: F-9  F-10
InitialCC:

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472096] New: Review Request: perl-Regexp-Assemble - Assemble multiple Regular Expressions into a single RE

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Regexp-Assemble - Assemble multiple Regular 
Expressions into a single RE

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472096

   Summary: Review Request: perl-Regexp-Assemble - Assemble
multiple Regular Expressions into a single RE
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Regexp-Assemble.spec
SRPM URL:
http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Regexp-Assemble-0.34-1.fc9.src.rpm
Description: 
Regexp::Assemble takes an arbitrary number of regular expressions and
assembles them into a single regular expression (or RE) that matches all
that the individual REs match.

This is one of several requirements for perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu.

Note: rpmlint gives two errors on the resulting RPM

perl-Regexp-Assemble.noarch: E: zero-length
/usr/share/doc/perl-Regexp-Assemble-0.34/eg/hostmatch/error.canonical
perl-Regexp-Assemble.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/perl-Regexp-Assemble-0.34/eg/file.3

Both are necessary as-is for t/05_hostmatch.t

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471863] Review Request: garmindev - Drivers for communication with Garmin GPS devices

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471863


Brian Pepple [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Flag||fedora-review?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472098] New: Review Request: dekiwiki - a powerful opensource wiki which runs on Mono

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: dekiwiki - a powerful opensource wiki which runs on 
Mono

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472098

   Summary: Review Request: dekiwiki - a powerful opensource wiki
which runs on Mono
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL:
http://nightlybuild.mindtouch.com/Submitted_Packages/Fedora/src/dekiwiki.spec
SRPM URL:
http://nightlybuild.mindtouch.com/Submitted_Packages/Fedora/src/dekiwiki-8.08.11662-1.1.src.rpm

Description: MindTouch Deki is a free open source wiki and application platform
for communities and enterprises. Deki is an easy to use and sophisticated wiki
for authoring, aggregating, organizing, and sharing content. Deki is also a
platform for creating collaborative applications, or adding wiki capabilities
to existing applications.

Thanks for helping us with this package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874





--- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 14:00:28 EDT 
---
This fails to build; autoreconf is called without any build dependency on the
autotools.  Some people insist that autotools should never be called as part of
a package build; I'm not one of them, but it seems a waste for that one line
change.  Do you know how much change there is in the resulting Makefile?  Maybe
you could just patch that instead.  Or, I guess, fix the build dependency.

The descriptive texts are better now; the only notes I'd make are
s/standarts/standards/ in the main package %description and terminate
%description lines with periods.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471863] Review Request: garmindev - Drivers for communication with Garmin GPS devices

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471863


Brian Pepple [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Brian Pepple [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 13:59:58 EDT 
---
Good:
* verified svn source tarball
* Package name conforms to the Fedora Naming Guidelines
* Group Tag is from the official list
* License tag is valud
* Buildroot has all required elements
* All paths begin with macros
* All directories are owned by this or other packages
* All necessary BuildRequires listed.
* rpmlint produces no errors or warnings
* Builds fine in mock.

+1 APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 469955] Review Request: fprintd - D-Bus service for Fingerprint reader access

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469955





--- Comment #2 from Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 14:03:33 EDT 
---
(In reply to comment #1)
 Some issues I noticed at my first check:
 
 - Why do you need a Conflict with pam_fprint, are Obsolutes/Provides not 
 better
 fitted here?
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts

It's not stable/tested enough to replace pam_fprint. So I'm currently only
conflicting with it.

 - Source0 is not a URL and it is not explained how to create the source
 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL

True, will fix.

 - Is it intentional that the config files in /etc are not marked as %config?

Yes and no. %{_sysconfdir}/fprintd.conf should be marked as %config, but it
doesn't actually do anything useful yet, so it's better to just have it
replaced for now. I should add a comment about it.

 Btw. the release string of the linked libfprint seems to be wrong, it should 
 be
 0.1.pre.fc10 instead of 1.pre.fc10

That should be fixed, I updated libfprint in F11:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=938201

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471863] Review Request: garmindev - Drivers for communication with Garmin GPS devices

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471863


Dan Horák [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #2 from Dan Horák [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 14:35:50 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: garmindev
Short Description: Drivers for communication with Garmin GPS devices
Owners: sharkcz silfreed
Branches: F-9 F-10

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472098] Review Request: dekiwiki - a powerful opensource wiki which runs on Mono

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472098


David Nalley [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Flag||needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED]
   ||h.com)




--- Comment #1 from David Nalley [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 14:45:14 EDT 
---
Hi Mathieu, 

I'll do a quick informal review as I can't sponsor you, but hopefully it will
get you in better shape for reviews down the road. 

Using rpmlint:

./dekiwiki.spec:11: W: hardcoded-packager-tag [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fedora packages don't specify the packager for a number of different reasons -
so a quick removal of that line will take care of at least one error. 

./dekiwiki.spec:13: W: unversioned-explicit-provides mono(mindtouch.dream)

There is no version number with mindtouch.dream and there should be so that
version changes become more obvious. 

./dekiwiki.spec:50: W: setup-not-quiet

No one wants to see all of the output of installation when using an rpm. 

./dekiwiki.spec: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install

It actually looks like you are cleaning the buildroot. It may be looking for
the line without the brackets. 

./dekiwiki.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 2, tab: line
155)

Obvious 


In addition I noticed in the installation instructions that you had: 

yum install wv links pdftohtml tidy

You probably want to add those as requires in your spec file. 

Obviously princexml can't be included, but perhaps dompdf or a similar html2pdf
app that's licensed as open source as be used.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 458288] Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288





--- Comment #15 from John A. Khvatov [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 16:37:05 
EDT ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: gitosis
New Branches: EL-5
Owners: ivaxer slankes

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 458288] Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288


John A. Khvatov [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review+  |fedora-review?




--- Comment #16 from John A. Khvatov [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 16:40:17 
EDT ---
To Mamoru: I can't set fedora-cvs flag to ? for new branch request. Why?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471575] Review Request: libnautilus-vcards - Nautilus vcard context menu extension

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471575





--- Comment #2 from Alec Leamas [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 16:29:53 EDT ---
I'm trying to do my homework... Reviewed some other packages, read still more
other reviews. Updated the package, including spec file. See the changelog for
more info.

New urls: 

http://downloads.sourceforge.net/dt-contacts/libnautilus-vcards-0.2-48.fc9.src.rpm
and 

http://downloads.sourceforge.net/dt-contacts/libnautilus-vcards.spec

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471373] Review Request: rmanage - Remotely monitoring machines on network

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471373


Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Flag||fedora-review?




--- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 16:45:05 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2) 
 Note: As no translations are provided by this package I have not used
 guidelines for Handling locale files.

That's ok

I'm unable to rebuild your package. The issue is the name of the .desktop file. 

File not found:
/home/fab/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/rmanage-0.1.5-2.fc9.i386/usr/share/applications/fedora-rmanage.desktop

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915


Permaine Cheung [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Flag||fedora-review?




--- Comment #1 from Permaine Cheung [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 16:52:25 
EDT ---
I'll take this one.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 470508] Review Request: Ajaxterm - A web-based terminal

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470508


Ruben Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #10 from Ruben Kerkhof [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 17:02:36 EDT 
---
Thanks, I'll fix the above mentioned points before importing.

New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: Ajaxterm
Short Description: A web-based terminal
Owners: ruben
Branches: F-8 F-9 EL-4 EL-5

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915





--- Comment #2 from Permaine Cheung [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 17:18:44 
EDT ---
There are a few BuildRequires in this package that doesn't exist in Fedora,
here's what I'm seeing in a mock build:

No Package Found for javamail_1_3_1_api
No Package Found for wsdl4j16
No Package Found for jbossas = 0:4.2.0

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 469585] Review Request: moon-buggy - Drive and jump with some car accros the moon

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469585





--- Comment #7 from Philipp Baum [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 17:35:08 EDT 
---
Here is the New Version:


http://www.Thinkcoding.org/Fedora/moon-buggy.spec
http://www.Thinkcoding.org/Fedora/moon-buggy-1.0.51-3.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018





--- Comment #24 from Tim Fenn [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 18:15:09 EDT ---
cvs builds done, update request submitted to bodhi for F-9 and F-10.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472144] New: Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations.

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144

   Summary: Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500
stations.
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tvbrowser.spec
SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/tvbrowser-2.7.1-0.3.fc10.i386.rpm
Description: TV-Browser is a free electronic program guide (EPG). It offers
more than 500 stations.

This is my first package (with a little starting aid from che on #fedora-de)
and I need a mentor.

When I build the rpm, I seem to have some small problems that I've not been
able to solve:
- find: `debug': No such file or directory
- some in-the-jars operation has a problem with a file within a jar that has
spaces in its filename:
+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars
cp: cannot stat `./bbc/rd/tvanytime/util/Copy': No such file or directory
cp: cannot stat `of': No such file or directory
cp: cannot stat `DVBLocatorToolbox': No such file or directory
- javadoc compilation fails in this version of tvbrowser. I commmented those
parts out for now and hope upstream will solve this.

Nevertheless, I can install and run the application just fine.

I was not sure, if it's ok to include out-of-the-box plugins/whatever in the
base package or if I need to create additional packages for those.

Comments and mentors welcome ;)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467645] Review Request: sugar-distance - Distance measurement for Sugar

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467645


Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

External Bug ID||OLPC 8964




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467645] Review Request: sugar-distance - Distance measurement for Sugar

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467645


Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

External Bug ID||OLPC 9009




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467645] Review Request: sugar-distance - Distance measurement for Sugar

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467645





--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 18:39:23 
EDT ---
No action from upstream for a week.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150


Tim Fenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||472149




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472149] Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149


Tim Fenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||472150




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 468491] Review Request: sugar-connect - Connect for Sugar

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468491


Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

External Bug ID||OLPC 8966




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472150] New: Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150

   Summary: Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular
building toolkit
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot-0.5-1.f8.src.rpm

Description: Coot is a toolkit for Macromolecular Crystallography and
model-building.  Coot uses OpenGL, together with a new approach to map
contouring and importing/creation and other modelling and building operations. 
It displays maps and models and allows model manipulations such as
idealization, real space refinement, manual rotation/translation, rigid-body
fitting, ligand search, solvation, mutations, rotamers, Ramachandran plots...

Also see: http://www.ysbl.york.ac.uk/~emsley/coot/

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472149] New: Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand dictionaries

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472149

   Summary: Review Request: refmac-dictionary - chemical ligand
dictionaries
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/refmac-dictionary.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/refmac-dictionary-5.02-1.f8.src.rpm

Description: The refmac ligand dictionaries contain chemical information on a
large number of molecules, including the chemical structure of the ligand,
the tree-like structure, the links between ligands, and possible
modifications to them.  This information is stored in the mmCIF
format, which is used by a number of molecular viewing, refinement and
validation tools.

Also see: http://www.ysbl.york.ac.uk/~garib/refmac/latest_refmac.html

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644





--- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 19:12:00 
EDT ---
Update

Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-memorize.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-memorize-29-1.fc10.src.rpm
Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=938635

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - Maze for Sugar

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641





--- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 19:21:52 
EDT ---
No action from upstream for a week.  To be honest, I see no benefit to work
with the snapshot tarball.  I would like to suggest that we work with the
checkout from git till release tarballs are available. 

Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-maze.spec
SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-maze-6-2.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 468120] Review Request: sugar-implode - Implode for Sugar

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468120


Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

External Bug ID||OLPC 8965




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467643] Review Request: sugar-speak - Speak for Sugar

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467643


Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

External Bug ID||OLPC 8961




--- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 19:33:03 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
 sugar-maze.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities

Copy-and-paste error? ;-)  Anyway, the permission of the file from comment #1
are fixed

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467644] Review Request: sugar-memorize - Memorize for Sugar

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467644





--- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 19:50:15 
EDT ---
Simon, did you do a full review? I'm just asking because the flag is set to '+'
but the bug is not assigned to you.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 468116] Review Request: sugar-analyze - Analysing tool for Sugar

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468116





--- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 19:50:36 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
 Can you please confirm if mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{sugaractivitydir} is
 actually necessary? I'd expect setup.py to take care of it.

You are right, 'mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{sugaractivitydir}' is not needed.

 Anyway r+. Thanks!
 
 (you forgot to set fedora-review to ?)

Did you do a full review? The flag is set to '+' but the bug is not assigned to
you.

Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-analyze.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-analyze-8-2.fc10.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 435018] Review Request: clipper - crystallographic object oriented library

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435018


Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




--- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 20:26:58 EDT 
---
Thank you.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 462529] Review Request: python-feedcache - Wrapper for Mark Pilgrim's FeedParser module which caches feed content

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462529


Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 20:40:19 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471863] Review Request: garmindev - Drivers for communication with Garmin GPS devices

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471863


Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 20:41:26 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 467791] Review Request: vtun - Virtual tunnel over TCP/IP networks

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467791


Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 20:43:02 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 463768] Package review: perl-PAR

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463768


Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 20:44:01 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 470508] Review Request: Ajaxterm - A web-based terminal

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470508


Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 20:45:56 EDT 
---
I assume you wanted a F-10 branch here as well? 

cvs done with F-10 added.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 461407] Review Request: laf-plugin - Generic plugin framework for Java look-and-feels

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461407


Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 20:50:55 EDT 
---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471522] Review Request: otl - OTL library for database connections and queries

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522





--- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 20:49:26 EDT 
---
Well, the upstream project is otl so I would call it that here as well. 
Do other linux distros ship it as otl-devel? Is it better known by that name?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273


Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #32 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 20:53:13 EDT 
---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471662] Review Request: qlandkartegt - GPS device mapping tool

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471662


Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 20:54:52 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471373] Review Request: rmanage - Remotely monitoring machines on network

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471373





--- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 20:58:21 EDT 
---
(In reply to comment #3)
 (In reply to comment #2) 
  Note: As no translations are provided by this package I have not used
  guidelines for Handling locale files.
 
 That's ok
 
 I'm unable to rebuild your package. The issue is the name of the .desktop 
 file. 
 
 File not found:
 /home/fab/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/rmanage-0.1.5-2.fc9.i386/usr/share/applications/fedora-rmanage.desktop

oops. Sorry I forgot to change %files section.

here is updated links for package.
Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/rmanage/rmanage.spec
SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/rmanage/rmanage-0.1.5-2.fc9.src.rpm

Note:- I have kept same release number. If you want me to bump release please
ask for that and will do that.

koji scratch build:-http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=938763

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471527] Review Request: SNMP++ - SNMP C++ library

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527





--- Comment #10 from Hayden James [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 21:43:58 EDT 
---
Ok, I spoke with upstream about the soname issue.  They basically said that I
should start the versioning at 0.0.0 and they will continue with 1.0.0 on the
next release (3.2.24).  I will make that change and upload new rpm and spec
file.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 468116] Review Request: sugar-analyze - Analysing tool for Sugar

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468116


Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]




--- Comment #9 from Marco Pesenti Gritti [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 
21:59:21 EDT ---
Yeah I did a full review. Reassigning to me now, I missed that part of the
process.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472083] Review Request: perl-boolean - Boolean support for Perl

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472083





--- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 22:25:23 EDT ---
Koji build fails due to missing br on perl(Test::More).

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=938137

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472072] Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472072





--- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 22:24:01 EDT ---
Test::Pod is missing from the BR (as well as Test::Pod::Coverage, but it's not
a blocker).  Please consider running a scratch build through koji; helps catch
things like this :-)

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=938107

Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (perl); make test
passes cleanly.

8261e3d77145f0b154641597b7983bd6  Sub-Override-0.08.tar.gz
8261e3d77145f0b154641597b7983bd6  Sub-Override-0.08.tar.gz.srpm

= perl-Sub-Override-0.08-1.fc9.noarch.rpm =
 rpmlint
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
 provides for perl-Sub-Override-0.08-1.fc9.noarch.rpm
perl(Sub::Override) = 0.08
perl-Sub-Override = 0.08-1.fc9
 requires for perl-Sub-Override-0.08-1.fc9.noarch.rpm
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)  
perl(strict)  
perl(warnings)

Add the br on Test::Pod and I'll approve.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472079] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Copy - Copy Regexp objects

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472079





--- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 22:26:45 EDT ---
Koji build fails due to missing br on perl(Test::More).

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=938132

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273





--- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 
22:29:58 EDT ---
quickfix-1.12.4-6.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/quickfix-1.12.4-6.fc9

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 458288] Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288


Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?, fedora-cvs+ |fedora-review+, fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 22:40:43 EDT 
---
For now I set fedora-cvs flag.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 455581] Review Request: php-pecl-ssh2 - php bindings to the functions of libssh2

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455581


Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 22:50:19 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471787] Review Request: taginfo - Printer of Tag Information from Media Files

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471787


Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 22:46:43 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 193271] Review Request: python-dns - DNS toolkit for Python

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193271


Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 22:51:31 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471809] Review Request: gnome-gmail-notifier - A simple application that monitors Gmail inboxes

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471809


Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 22:48:52 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 458288] Review Request: gitosis - git repository hosting application

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458288


Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 22:53:59 EDT 
---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471527] Review Request: SNMP++ - SNMP C++ library

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471527





--- Comment #11 from Hayden James [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 22:51:46 EDT 
---
Ok here are the updated rpms:

http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/snmp++.spec
http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/snmp++-3.2.23-3.fc9.src.rpm

I also created a package for log4cxx (sorry for cross listing, but didn't find
anyone to review it yet)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 469273] Review Request: quickfix - development library for FIX based applications

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469273


Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




--- Comment #34 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 22:52:48 EDT 
---
Thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 435017] Review Request: ssm - coordinate superposition library

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435017


Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




--- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 23:00:21 EDT 
---
Closing, thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471522] Review Request: otl - OTL library for database connections and queries

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471522





--- Comment #12 from Hayden James [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 22:58:24 EDT 
---
I renamed the package to otl

http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/otl-4.0.176-5.fc9.src.rpm
http://hayden.doesntexist.com/~hjames/otl.spec

There are no other changes. So I would like to go ahead with the cvs request:

New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: otl
Short Description: OTL is a C++ template library for Oracle/OCI, ODBC, and
DB2/CLI connectivity
Owners: hjames
Branches: F-9 F-10
InitialCC: mtasaka lemenkov


Thanks.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472085] Review Request: perl-HTML-Tiny - Lightweight, dependency free HTML/XML generation

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472085


Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Alias||perl-HTML-Tiny
   Flag||fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 23:01:19 EDT ---
There is an examples/ directory; why not include it in %doc?

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=939263

Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (perl); make test
passes cleanly.

ce178f7dabb15930512fdbfe21d4edcb  HTML-Tiny-1.03.tar.gz
ce178f7dabb15930512fdbfe21d4edcb  HTML-Tiny-1.03.tar.gz.srpm

= perl-HTML-Tiny-1.03-1.fc9.noarch.rpm =
 rpmlint
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
 provides for perl-HTML-Tiny-1.03-1.fc9.noarch.rpm
perl(HTML::Tiny) = 1.03
perl-HTML-Tiny = 1.03-1.fc9
 requires for perl-HTML-Tiny-1.03-1.fc9.noarch.rpm
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)  
perl(Carp)  
perl(strict)  
perl(vars)  

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 471829] Review Request: log4cxx - Log4cxx - a port to C++ of the Log4j project

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471829


Hayden James [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472096] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Assemble - Assemble multiple Regular Expressions into a single RE

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472096


Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Alias||perl-Regexp-Assemble
   Flag||fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 23:24:26 EDT ---
The EOL encoding of file.3 is deliberate; as is the zero-length error.  They're
both under %doc, so no problem.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=939265

Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (perl); make test
passes cleanly.

ddbf21d4d2e03798d351a34e79cafa30  Regexp-Assemble-0.34.tar.gz
ddbf21d4d2e03798d351a34e79cafa30  Regexp-Assemble-0.34.tar.gz.srpm

= perl-Regexp-Assemble-0.34-1.fc9.noarch.rpm =
 rpmlint
perl-Regexp-Assemble.noarch: E: zero-length
/usr/share/doc/perl-Regexp-Assemble-0.34/eg/hostmatch/error.canonical
perl-Regexp-Assemble.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/perl-Regexp-Assemble-0.34/eg/file.3
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.
 provides for perl-Regexp-Assemble-0.34-1.fc9.noarch.rpm
perl(Regexp::Assemble) = 0.34
perl-Regexp-Assemble = 0.34-1.fc9
 requires for perl-Regexp-Assemble-0.34-1.fc9.noarch.rpm
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)  
perl(constant)  
perl(overload)  
perl(re)  
perl(strict)  
perl(vars) 

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472027] Review Request: onboard - Simple on-screen Keyboard

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472027


Parag AN(पराग) [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Flag||fedora-review?




--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 23:39:09 EDT 
---
Just to note here that this package was previously submitted in bug447367

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947





--- Comment #19 from Ankur Sinha [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 23:44:40 EDT 
---
hi,

updated the packages.. I did look at the pdf that youve mentioned.. I couldnt
figure how to include it though, tried a few things but got stuck with errors..

here are the packages..

http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts.spec

http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oldstandard-fonts/oldstandard-sfd-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm

Can you tell me how to change the changelog please?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955


Ankur Sinha [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|needinfo?([EMAIL PROTECTED] |
   |o.co.in)|




--- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-18 23:41:25 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
 Ping?

hi,

upadated the package to remove the text errors.. I understand most of the spec
file (manuals clarify everything that i do).. Im stuck on the fontconfig
rules.. Thats why i asked for documentation.. I have no idea whats written in
there and what ive added on given advice..(points 8 9 10) :( i havent much
knowledge on Font families etc.. Any help with that?

here are the updated packages.. 

http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts-1.1-1.fc9.src.rpm

http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/BonvenoCF-fonts/cf-bonveno-fonts.spec

and okay, Ill start using mock.. 

Ill update the wishlist..

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472165] New: Review Request: perl-Test-Strict - Check syntax, presence of use strict/warnings, and test coverage

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Strict - Check syntax, presence of use 
strict/warnings, and test coverage
Alias: perl-Test-Strict

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472165

   Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Strict - Check syntax,
presence of use strict/warnings, and test coverage
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
   URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-Strict
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Test-Strict.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Test-Strict-0.09-1.fc9.src.rpm

Description:
Test::Strict lets you check the syntax, presence of use strict; and
use warnings; in your perl code.  It reports its results in standard
Test::Simple fashion.


Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=939335

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472083] Review Request: perl-boolean - Boolean support for Perl

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472083





--- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-19 00:00:16 EDT ---
Sorry - must remember to always build with mock first.

New SRPM URL: http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-boolean-0.20-2.fc9.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472072] Review Request: perl-Sub-Override - Perl extension for easily overriding subroutines

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472072





--- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-19 00:01:24 EDT ---
New SRPM URL:
http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Sub-Override-0.08-2.fc9.src.rpm

Test::Pod and Test::Pod::Coverage included now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472079] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Copy - Copy Regexp objects

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472079





--- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-19 00:03:11 EDT ---
new SRPM URL:
http://iarnell.fedorapeople.org/perl-Regexp-Copy-0.06-2.fc9.src.rpm

added the missing Test::More BR.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472085] Review Request: perl-HTML-Tiny - Lightweight, dependency free HTML/XML generation

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472085


Iain Arnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-19 00:06:36 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: perl-HTML-Tiny
Short Description: Lightweight, dependency free HTML/XML generation
Owners: iarnell
Branches: F-9 F-10
InitialCC: perl-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472096] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Assemble - Assemble multiple Regular Expressions into a single RE

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472096


Iain Arnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-19 00:08:29 EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: perl-Regexp-Assemble
Short Description: Assemble multiple Regular Expressions into a single RE
Owners: iarnell
Branches: F-9 F-10
InitialCC: perl-sig

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472167] New: Review Request: perl-asa - Lets your class/object say it works like something else

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: perl-asa - Lets your class/object say it works like 
something else
Alias: perl-asa

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472167

   Summary: Review Request: perl-asa - Lets your class/object say
it works like something else
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
   URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/asa
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-asa.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-asa-0.02-1.fc9.src.rpm

Description:
Perl 5 doesn't natively support Java-style interfaces, and it doesn't
support Perl 6 style roles either.

You can get both of these things in half a dozen different ways via various
CPAN modules, but they usually require that you buy into their way of
implementing your code.

This package overrides the isa() method, allowing your class to claim it's a
class it's not (that is, isn't in @ISA).


Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=939375

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472165] Review Request: perl-Test-Strict - Check syntax, presence of use strict/warnings, and test coverage

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472165





--- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-11-19 00:08:05 EDT ---
This package is a dep of App::Asciio.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 472170] New: Review Request: perl-Check-ISA - DWIM, correct checking of an object's class

2008-11-18 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: perl-Check-ISA - DWIM, correct checking of an object's 
class
Alias: perl-Check-ISA

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472170

   Summary: Review Request: perl-Check-ISA - DWIM, correct
checking of an object's class
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
  Platform: All
   URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Check-ISA
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
 Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 QAContact: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], fedora-package-review@redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Check-ISA.spec
SRPM URL:
http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Check-ISA-0.04-1.fc9.src.rpm

Description:
This module provides several functions to assist in testing whether a value
is an object, and if so, ask about its class.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


  1   2   >