[Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460
Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-01-23
03:20:11 EDT ---
For 0.9.0-3:
* Re-definig %__python
- Would you explain why you redefine %__python?
(On Fedora %__python is defined as /usr/bin/python).
* Seemingly redundant version specific dependency
- python 2.4 is introduced on Fedora Core 4
- sendmail 8.13.1 is already on Fedora Core 3
I think Requires: python = 2.4, sendmail = 8.13 is
now just redundant.
* Macros
- Use macros for some basic directories.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros
/var should be %{_localstatedir}
* Using INSTALLED_FILES
- Your way of using INSTALLED_FILES is still unsafe. It
will cause unowned directories when pymilter comes
to create some subdirectories under %_libdir or
%python_sitearch/Milter .
Instead there is much simpler and safer way like:
--
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc README ...
%{python_sitearch}/Milter/
%{libdir}/
%dir %attr(0755,mail,mail) /var/run/milter
--
! Note
For example, %{python_sitearch}/Milter/ contains the directory
%{python_sitearch}/Milter/ itself and all files/directories/etc
under this directory.
! By the way this package uses %python_sitearch not %python_sitelib
so currently rebuild fails on x86_64, ppc64.
* No config file
- Files under %_libdir (for this package start.sh) should not be
marked as %config
(If this file really should be marked as %config, put the file
under %_sysconfdir and use symlink).
? Seemingly missing directory
- It seems that %libdir/start.sh needs %{_localstatedir}/log/milter
but it is uncertain which rpm owns this directory
(at least yum returns currently no packages in Fedora owns
this directory).
Should this directory be owned by this package? Or is it expected
that this directory already exists? (in such case which rpm
will create this directory?)
! %changelog format
- I recommend that one line is put between each %changelog entry
like:
%changelog
* Wed Jan 07 2009 Stuart Gathman stu...@bmsi.com 0.9.0-2
- Changes to meet Fedora standards
* Mon Nov 24 2008 Stuart Gathman stu...@bmsi.com 0.9.0-1
- Split pymilter into its own CVS module
- Support chgfrom and addrcpt_par
- Support NS records in Milter.dns
* Mon Aug 25 2008 Stuart Gathman stu...@bmsi.com 0.8.10-2
- /var/run/milter directory must be owned by mail
This is useful on Fedora CVS for some reason.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463035] Review Request: pyroman - Very fast firewall configuration tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463035 Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@it3.be changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gratien.dha...@it3.be --- Comment #6 from Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@it3.be 2009-01-23 04:06:59 EDT --- what is the current status? Will you release a new version of the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479667] Review Request: perl-ORLite-Migrate - Extremely light weight SQLite-specific schema migration
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479667 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455558] Review Request: udns - DNS resolver library for both synchronous and asynchronous DNS queries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=48 Adrian Reber adr...@lisas.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Adrian Reber adr...@lisas.de 2009-01-23 05:07:13 EDT --- The file conflict has been resolved a few months ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455558] Review Request: udns - DNS resolver library for both synchronous and asynchronous DNS queries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=48 Adrian Reber adr...@lisas.de changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||480335 Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Adrian Reber adr...@lisas.de 2009-01-23 05:08:27 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: udns New Branches: EL-5 Owners: adrian ben -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-01-23 05:54:41 EDT --- Thanks Kevin for looking at this. CVS request coming up ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475755] Review Request: devtodo - Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475755 --- Comment #8 from Patrick Monnerat p...@datasphere.ch 2009-01-23 05:53:45 EDT --- Ping ? Package has passed review successfully (comment #7). Bernie, do you still plan to import this package in Fedora ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-01-23 05:57:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mingw32-libgpg-error Short Description: MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library Owners: rjones lfarkas berrange mingwmaint Branches: EL-5 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-01-23 06:16:35 EDT --- Nice addition to Fedora/EPEL repository. If nobody will volunteer to review it, then I'll pick it up (probably diring next week or so). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481272] Review Request: python-webunit - it test your websites with code that acts like a web browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481272 Petr Sklenar pskle...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 --- Comment #1 from Petr Sklenar pskle...@redhat.com 2009-01-23 06:19:28 EDT --- Hello, this is my first package, and you I am seeking a sponsor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481272] New: Review Request: python-webunit - it test your websites with code that acts like a web browser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-webunit - it test your websites with code that acts like a web browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481272 Summary: Review Request: python-webunit - it test your websites with code that acts like a web browser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pskle...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/psklenar/python-webunit.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/psklenar/python-webunit-1.3.8-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Unit test your websites with code that acts like a web browser. Features in a nutshell: 1. Browser-like page fetching including fetching the images and stylesheets needed for a page and following redirects 2. Cookies stored and trackable (all automatically handled) 3. HTTP, HTTPS, GET, POST, basic auth all handled, control over expected status codes, ... 4. DOM parsing of pages to retrieve and analyse structure, including simple form re-posting 5. Two-line page-fetch followed by form-submit possible, with error checking 6. Ability to register error page content across multiple tests 7. Uses python's standard unittest module as the underlying framework -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481056] Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481056 Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lemen...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-01-23 06:20:09 EDT --- BTW there was a closed ticket with attempt to submit this package already. I thought there are some license issues - are they resolved (if any). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479978] Review Request: libnewmat - Newmat C++ matrix library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #1 from Pascal pascal...@parois.net 2009-01-23 06:26:25 EDT --- Sorry guys, I broke my webserver, files are no longer available at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727 --- Comment #22 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-01-23 06:51:31 EDT --- l@@k http://qmail.kldp.org/src/patches/glibc-2.3.1/daemontools-0.76.errno.patch about stripping in conf-ld, you can do this in .spec instead of creating a patch, something like this echo gcc src/conf-ld but if you want to use patch there are no problem, but create one patch for each change for example. 0 - daemontools-0.76.errno.patch 1 - daemontools-0.76.install.patch 2 - daemontools-0.76.remove_stripping_conf-ld.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480727] Review Request: daemontools: is a collection of tools for managing UNIX services.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480727
--- Comment #23 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2009-01-23 07:06:39
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #22)
echo gcc src/conf-ld
Wrong.
sed -i -e \
s!^gcc.*\$!%{__cc} ${RPM_OPT_FLAGS} -include /usr/include/errno.h!
src/conf-cc
sed -i -e \
s!^gcc.*\$!%{__cc} ${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}! src/conf-ld
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481288] New: Review Request: python-wokkel - Enhancements to the Twisted XMPP protocol implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-wokkel - Enhancements to the Twisted XMPP protocol implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481288 Summary: Review Request: python-wokkel - Enhancements to the Twisted XMPP protocol implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ru...@rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-wokkel.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/python-wokkel-0.4.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Wokkel is collection of enhancements on top of the Twisted networking framework, written in Python. It mostly provides a testing ground for enhancements to the Jabber/XMPP protocol implementation as found in Twisted Words, that are meant to eventually move there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #15 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-01-23 08:32:02 EDT --- I see no objections, I'll move forward on EOL'ing these asap. A libmusicbrainz3 pkg rename can be reconsidered at a later date. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481141] Review Request: pycryptsetup - Python bindings for cryptsetup tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481141 --- Comment #4 from Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com 2009-01-23 08:33:47 EDT --- Still not silent rpmlint: python-cryptsetup.src: W: strange-permission python-cryptsetup.spec 0600 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. That's from your playing with git ;-) and on the binary package: python-cryptsetup.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python- cryptsetup-0.0.1/selftest.py python-cryptsetup.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.1 ['0.0.1-1.fc10', '0.0.1-1'] python-cryptsetup.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/cryptsetup.so python-cryptsetup.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-cryptsetup-0.0.1/selftest.py /usr/bin/python Please, get rid of these (or at least most of them -- the last probably goes away if the examples are not executable). No idea, about unscript binary object. #Requires: cryptsetup-luks It is considered bad habit to comment out in spec files -- CVS is not an ideal VCS, but we have previous versions recorded. Requires: python Don't you care about version? Will python 1.5 work? (OK, maybe not that, but people may want to rebuild this on RHEL for example). What happened to examples/ ? Still no URL in Source. Stuff you have in URL: field should be in Source: However, MD5 is OK d6b3486e096097c52e939b40c33aa130 So, yes, we need one more round to get this together. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #16 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu 2009-01-23 08:52:21 EDT --- Damn, looks like the new kscd in kdemultimedia-4.2.x has a hard-dep on libmusicbrainz... the best laid plans go awry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481141] Review Request: pycryptsetup - Python bindings for cryptsetup tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481141 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d...@danny.cz --- Comment #5 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2009-01-23 08:54:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) Still not silent rpmlint: python-cryptsetup.src: W: strange-permission python-cryptsetup.spec 0600 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. That's from your playing with git ;-) and on the binary package: python-cryptsetup.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python- cryptsetup-0.0.1/selftest.py python-cryptsetup.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.1 ['0.0.1-1.fc10', '0.0.1-1'] python-cryptsetup.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/cryptsetup.so python-cryptsetup.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-cryptsetup-0.0.1/selftest.py /usr/bin/python Please, get rid of these (or at least most of them -- the last probably goes away if the examples are not executable). No idea, about unscript binary object. unstripped-binary-or-object is usually result of missing the executable bits on that object -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481257] Review Request: perl-Devel-SmallProf - Per-line Perl profiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481257 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2009-01-23 09:12:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Devel-SmallProf Short Description: Per-line Perl profiler Owners: iarnell Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473184] Review Request: clamz - Amazon Downloader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473184 Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@it3.be changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gratien.dha...@it3.be --- Comment #9 from Gratien D'haese gratien.dha...@it3.be 2009-01-23 09:20:49 EDT --- spec files contaims: BuildRequires: libcurl-devel, libgcrypt-devel, expat-devel = Required libgpg-error.so.0 library is part of libgpg-error-devel package (missing) A mock build tells us: desktop-file-install: command not found == missing in BuildRequires When I have a look at the libraries needed by binary clamz $ ldd clamz linux-gate.so.1 = (0x0011) libgcrypt.so.11 = /lib/libgcrypt.so.11 (0x030e8000) libgpg-error.so.0 = /lib/libgpg-error.so.0 (0x02888000) libcurl.so.4 = /usr/lib/libcurl.so.4 (0x00bc5000) libexpat.so.1 = /lib/libexpat.so.1 (0x005e9000) libc.so.6 = /lib/libc.so.6 (0x0017a000) libidn.so.11 = /lib/libidn.so.11 (0x0255) libssh2.so.1 = /usr/lib/libssh2.so.1 (0x00b75000) libldap-2.4.so.2 = /usr/lib/libldap-2.4.so.2 (0x00b31000) librt.so.1 = /lib/librt.so.1 (0x0044a000) libgssapi_krb5.so.2 = /usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2 (0x031f1000) libkrb5.so.3 = /usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3 (0x04415000) libk5crypto.so.3 = /usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3 (0x0279f000) libcom_err.so.2 = /lib/libcom_err.so.2 (0x00596000) libz.so.1 = /lib/libz.so.1 (0x0035) libssl3.so = /lib/libssl3.so (0x02fd8000) libsmime3.so = /lib/libsmime3.so (0x0300b000) libnss3.so = /lib/libnss3.so (0x04527000) libplds4.so = /lib/libplds4.so (0x00d6e000) libplc4.so = /lib/libplc4.so (0x00d74000) libnspr4.so = /lib/libnspr4.so (0x02f6e000) libpthread.so.0 = /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00317000) libdl.so.2 = /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x0031) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x0015a000) libssl.so.7 = /lib/libssl.so.7 (0x00ae4000) libcrypto.so.7 = /lib/libcrypto.so.7 (0x047a4000) liblber-2.4.so.2 = /usr/lib/liblber-2.4.so.2 (0x00d3e000) libresolv.so.2 = /lib/libresolv.so.2 (0x00111000) libsasl2.so.2 = /usr/lib/libsasl2.so.2 (0x02d3c000) libkrb5support.so.0 = /usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.0 (0x0014d000) libkeyutils.so.1 = /lib/libkeyutils.so.1 (0x00148000) libnssutil3.so = /lib/libnssutil3.so (0x02faa000) libcrypt.so.1 = /lib/libcrypt.so.1 (0x0284f000) libselinux.so.1 = /lib/libselinux.so.1 (0x00332000) = suspect that Requires: field is needed too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #24 from Ankur Sinha ankursi...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-23 09:22:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: bonvenocf-fonts Short Description: A set of fun fonts from the crud factory, by Barry Schwartz. Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457947] Review Request: oldstandard-sfd-fonts - Old Standard Fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457947 --- Comment #35 from Ankur Sinha ankursi...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-23 09:23:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: oldstandard-sfd-fonts Short Description: Old Standard True-Type Fonts Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 --- Comment #5 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-01-23 09:56:25 EDT --- please take a l@@k when you have time. http://ispbrasil.com.br/mydns/mydns.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/mydns/mydns-1.2.8.18-1.fc10.src.rpm I am planning to use alternatives to make symlinks to postgresql or mysql binary's -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #25 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-01-23 09:56:08 EDT --- Please be more careful, infra will create a component with the exact name you give in your cvs request, and your srpm will have to be named the same way of this component. Please adjust your demand to the final agreed-on name -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477979] Review Request: ripMIME - Extract attachments out of a MIME encoded email packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477979 --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-01-23 10:03:51 EDT --- fixed http://ispbrasil.com.br/ripmime/ripmime.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/ripmime/ripmime-1.4.0.9-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481040] Review Request: skyeye - integrated simulation environment for typical Embedded Computer Systems
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481040 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-01-23 10:04:50 EDT --- New version, with cosmetic fixes ( removal of redundant or duplicate BRs ): Spec URL: http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/skyeye/skyeye.spec SRPM URL: http://wolfy.fedorapeople.org/skyeye/skyeye-1.2.6-3.rc1.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473367] Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 --- Comment #13 from Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com 2009-01-23 10:35:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: autotrust Short Description: DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011 Owners: pwouters Branches: F-10, F-9, EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480567] Review Request: dnssec-conf - DNSSEC and DLV configuration and priming tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480567 --- Comment #6 from Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com 2009-01-23 10:37:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: dnssec-conf Short Description: DNSSEC and DLV configuration and priming tool Owners: pwouters Branches: F-10, F-9, EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481322] New: Review Request: emacs-magit - Emacs interface to the most common Git operations
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: emacs-magit - Emacs interface to the most common Git operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481322 Summary: Review Request: emacs-magit - Emacs interface to the most common Git operations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t...@moertel.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://community.moertel.com/rpms/fedora/10/SPECS/emacs-magit.spec SRPM URL: http://community.moertel.com/rpms/fedora/10/SRPMS/emacs-magit-0.7-1.20090122git.fc10.src.rpm Description: Magit is an add-on package for GNU Emacs. It is an interface to the Git source-code management system that aims to make the most common operations convenient. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472848] Review Request: jeuclid - MathML rendering solution
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472848 --- Comment #36 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) kwiz...@gmail.com 2009-01-23 10:49:26 EDT --- Ok, done. But can we have the Rawhide build at least ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481333] New: Review Request:sugar-update-control - Activity update control panel for Sugar
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:sugar-update-control - Activity update control panel for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481333 Summary: Review Request:sugar-update-control - Activity update control panel for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: smparr...@shallowcreek.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/sugar-update-control/sugar-update-control.spec SRPM URL: http://tuxbrewr.fedorapeople.org/sugar-update-control/sugar-update-control-0.19-2.src.rpm Description: This is the Activity updater for the Sugar desktop. Build log here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1076695 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481173] Review Request: libnss-pgsql - NSS library that interface with PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481173 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-01-23 11:16:33 EDT --- For 1.4.0-2 * Latest version - The last stable version (1.4.0) seems to have been released 3 years ago. While the latest version is still beta (1.5.0-beta), it was released last August (i.e. 5 months ago) and as the last stable version seems old, I think using 1.5.0 beta seems preferable for Fedora. How do you think? * autotool recall - build.log shows: - 46 + ./configure --build=i386-redhat-linux-gnu .. 47 checking for a BSD-compatible install... 48 /usr/bin/install -c 49 checking whether build environment is sane... 50 yes 372 + make -j4 373 cd . /builddir/build/BUILD/libnss-pgsql-1.4.0/autoconf/missing aclocal-1.4 374 WARNING: `aclocal-1.4' is missing on your system. You should only need it if 375 you modified `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'. You might want 376 to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from 377 any GNU archive site. 378 cd . /builddir/build/BUILD/libnss-pgsql-1.4.0/autoconf/missing automake-1.4 --gnu Makefile 379 cd . /builddir/build/BUILD/libnss-pgsql-1.4.0/autoconf/missing autoconf 380 WARNING: `automake-1.4' is missing on your system. You should only need it if 381 you modified `Makefile.am', `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'. 382 You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. 383 Grab them from any GNU archive site. 384 WARNING: `autoconf' is missing on your system. You should only need it if 385 you modified `configure.in'. You might want to install the 386 `Autoconf' and `GNU m4' packages. Grab them from any GNU 387 archive site. 388 /bin/sh ./config.status --recheck 389 running /bin/sh ./configure --build=i386-redhat-linux-gnu 710 cd . \ 711 CONFIG_FILES=Makefile CONFIG_HEADERS= /bin/sh ./config.status 712 config.status: creating Makefile 713 config.status: executing default-1 commands 714 cd . /builddir/build/BUILD/libnss-pgsql-1.4.0/autoconf/missing autoheader - Here autotools are automatically called after calling make command, this is not expected. This is usually because timestamps on some files related to autotools are wrong. Please fix so that autotools are not called automatically after make. * Documents - Please add the following files to %doc. - AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog README - -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #18 from Jose Luis joseluisblan...@gmail.com 2009-01-23 11:32:05 EDT --- Thanks Mamoru! Give me a few days for the changes. And about the other review, I'll probably pick something from: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList Anyway: Is there any way to see the (latest) build logs at Koji? I've tried looking for mrpt without success... I guess the builds there are different from those in my Fedora. For example, there's a -g and a -mcpu making their way to CFLAGS and I cannot find where to remove it (some rpm config file?), and I wondered if they're not in the Koji builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451298] Review Request: purple-msn-pecan - Alternative MSN protocol plugin for libpurple
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451298 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-01-23 11:32:05 EDT --- Okay - This package itself is good - Your pre-review seems good for initial comments - Your another review request (bug 481173) is good to some extent (I wrote some comments) This package (purple-msn-pecan) is APPROVED by mtasaka Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from Install the Client Tools (Koji). Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479866] Review Request: eclipse-linuxprofilingframework - Eclipse Linux Tools Profiling Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479866 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-01-23 12:07:11 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Alex! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225660] Merge Review: crash
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225660 --- Comment #3 from Dave Anderson ander...@redhat.com 2009-01-23 12:11:22 EDT --- I'm not sure why the review was made of the crash.spec file from the upstream package instead of the Fedora version? When updating the Fedora package, the upstream spec file is not pulled into Fedora. In any case, I'm presuming that the relevant issues brought up re: the upstream spec file should be addressed in the Fedora version if they haven't already. The Fedora crash utility NVR scheme has (up until now) simply mirrored the upstream version upon which it was based, but I can see the validity in encapsulating the upstream NVR into the Fedora version. It's been an annoyance in the past when somebody has come in (unbeknownst to me) and bumped up the release number, which in turn screwed up the upstream NVR relationship. With respect to the CVE's, both 1704 and 4146 are highly unlikely to be issues given that the crash utility does a number of checks on the vmlinux object file prior to the embedded gdb module ever being invoked. (i.e., using the supplied sample hand-carved object files, they get rejected by the crash code as not being legitimate vmlinux files) Nonetheless, the patches for both of those issues are reasonable and safe to add, and I have done so. I've also incorporated the patch for the .gdbinit-related 1705 issue. When I update the upstream version, I will follow up with a Fedora update -- after I figure out how to check into my account given that I haven't been there since the Fedora break-in. Thanks, Dave Anderson -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476832] Review Request: mydns - serve DNS records directly from an SQL database
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476832 Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard|NotReady| --- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-01-23 12:10:01 EDT --- We need to run this script for both mysql and pgsql subpackages after it's installed Can you help with this? /usr/sbin/alternatives --install /usr/sbin/mydns MyDNS /usr/sbin/mydns-pgsql 1 \ --slave /usr/bin/mydnscheck mydnscheck /usr/bin/mydnscheck-pgsql \ --slave /usr/bin/mydnsexport mydnsexport /usr/bin/mydnsexport-pgsql \ --slave /usr/bin/mydnsimport mydnsimport /usr/bin/mydnsimport-pgsql \ --slave /usr/bin/mydnsptrconvert mydnsptrconvert /usr/bin/mydnsptrconvert-pgsql Can I put the mysql sub-package to conflict with pgsql or it's a bad idea ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479866] Review Request: eclipse-linuxprofilingframework - Eclipse Linux Tools Profiling Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479866 Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt overh...@redhat.com 2009-01-23 12:14:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: eclipse-linuxprofilingframework Short Description: Plugins common to Eclipse Linux Tools profiling tools. Owners: overholt Branches: F-10 InitialCC: ebaron -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 457955] Review Request: bonvenocf-fonts - BonvenoCF font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457955 --- Comment #26 from Ankur Sinha ankursi...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-23 12:20:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: cf-bonveno-fonts Short Description: A set of fun fonts from the crud factory, by Barry Schwartz. Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225660] Merge Review: crash
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225660 --- Comment #5 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-01-23 12:23:29 EDT --- I meant here relying on a bundled version of an existing application -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225660] Merge Review: crash
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225660 --- Comment #4 from manuel wolfshant wo...@nobugconsulting.ro 2009-01-23 12:22:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) I reviewed the upstream version because by definition so to say Fedora wants to have the latest version of the software, and the content in the cvs is very old. I assumed it will be easier for you to maintain a single or at least very similar spec for both places. I apologize if I made an error by this assumption. Let me know what is the URL of the files that I should have reviewed and I will do it. And yes, the relevant issues brought up re: the upstream spec file must be addressed in the Fedora version. And no, I did not touch the spec exactly because I knew that there is an active maintainer who might have a well defined agenda. As of relying on a bundled application, this is not usually permitted in Fedora and therefore they should be discussed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479978] Review Request: libnewmat - Newmat C++ matrix library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #2 from Pascal pascal...@parois.net 2009-01-23 12:35:25 EDT --- Fixed, file are available again. This library is going to be used by the next package I am going to submit. I am waiting for a new release upstream to submit it (http://vincefn.net/Fox/). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Adobe Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070
Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cassmod...@fedoraproject.or
||g
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org 2009-01-23
12:32:46 EDT ---
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#Things_To_Check_On_Review
# MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in
the review
DONE - rpmlint is silence
# MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
DONE - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/FontsPolicy#Naming
# MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
DONE
# MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
DONE
# MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines .
DONE - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses - LPPL is listed
there
# MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
DONE - README in upstream source package says
5. LICENSE
The license of this package is LPPL.
# MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.[4]
not applicable
# MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
DONE
# MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
DONE
# MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no
upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL
Guidelines for how to deal with this.
DONE - md5sum 1753fadcf6a0e196b583869106b5c074 - the md5sums of my download and
the source0 in srpm are equivalent
# MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
not applicable - noarch
# MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
not applicable
# MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
DONE
# MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
not applicable
# MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
not applicable
# MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
not applicable
# MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
DONE
# MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
DONE
# MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a
%defattr(...) line.
DONE
# MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
DONE
# MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
DONE
# MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
DONE
# MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition
of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to
size. Large can refer to either size or quantity).
not applicable
# MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run
properly if it is not present.
not applicable
# MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
not applicable
# MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
not applicable
# MUST: Packages containing
[Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Adobe Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 Simon Wesp cassmod...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|cassmod...@fedoraproject.or ||g -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481355] New: Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 Summary: Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: my...@yahoo.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/nurbs++.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/nurbs++-3.0.11-1.fc10.src.rpm Koji Scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1076942 rpmlint: $ rpmlint -i nurbs++.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/nurbs++-3.0.11-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/nurbs++-3.0.11-1.fc10.i386.rpm nurbs++.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libnurbsf.so.0.1.0 e...@glibc_2.0 nurbs++.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libnurbsd.so.0.1.0 e...@glibc_2.0 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. The shared lib calls have been posted upstream. Description: A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. Also featuring vector, matrix, and OpenGL support classes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225694] Merge Review: dictd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225694 Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|co...@gnome.eu.org Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481173] Review Request: libnss-pgsql - NSS library that interface with PostgreSQL
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481173 --- Comment #2 from Edouard Bourguignon ma...@linuxed.net 2009-01-23 12:52:23 EDT --- * We can give a try to the beta version, I didn't notice the 1.4.0 was so old. I try to follow the naming guidelines for beta version, hope I'm right. * Now beta is built without autotools being automatically called * Missing documents have been added But there is still the warning about the shared-lib-calls-exit... Here are the links: SPEC: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/libnss-pgsql.spec SRPM: http://www.linuxed.net/~madko/fedora/libnss-pgsql-1.5.0-0.1.beta.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225694] Merge Review: dictd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225694 Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475097] Review Request: gimp-fourier-plugin - A fourier transformation plugin for GIMP.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475097
Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-01-23
12:59:12 EDT ---
From the next time please change the release number
every time you modify your spec file.
* Compiler flags
- From Makefile and from what man gimptool says, for
this package the following is simpler:
-
%build
export CC=gcc %{optflags}
make %{?_smp_mflags}
-
* rpmlint issue
- Now README file is not in UTF-8 yet. Please change the
encoding of this file by iconv.
* Directory permission
-
E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/gimp-fourier-plugin-0.3.2 0644
-
- Umm.. %defattr(0644,root,root,-) does not seem to work, perhaps
rpm's bug. This should be either %defattr(-,root,root,-) (preferred)
or %defattr(0644,root,root,0755)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|182235 | --- Comment #37 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 2009-01-23 13:05:47 EDT --- Lifting FE-Legal, Red Hat has determined this can proceed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl Bug 467405 depends on bug 467398, which changed state. Bug 467398 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gettext - GNU libraries and utilities for producing multi-lingual messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467398 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED --- Comment #9 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2009-01-23 13:04:24 EDT --- This package doesn't compile anymore on Rawhide (due to the new libtool): Making all in . make[2]: Entering directory `/home/erik/rpmbuild/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2' /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile i686-pc-mingw32-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./include -I./include -DHAVE_WIN32_THREADS -D_REENTRANT-DWIN32 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -mms-bitfields -pedantic -W -Wformat -Wunused -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wswitch -Wcomment -Wtrigraphs -Wformat -Wchar-subscripts -Wuninitialized -Wparentheses -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Waggregate-return -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Winline -Wredundant-decls -MT SAX.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/SAX.Tpo -c -o SAX.lo SAX.c ./libtool: line 840: X--tag=CC: command not found ./libtool: line 873: libtool: ignoring unknown tag : command not found ./libtool: line 840: X--mode=compile: command not found ./libtool: line 1007: *** Warning: inferring the mode of operation is deprecated.: command not found ./libtool: line 1008: *** Future versions of Libtool will require --mode=MODE be specified.: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: Xi686-pc-mingw32-gcc: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-DHAVE_CONFIG_H: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-I.: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-I./include: No such file or directory ./libtool: line 1151: X-I./include: No such file or directory ./libtool: line 1151: X-DHAVE_WIN32_THREADS: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-D_REENTRANT: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-DWIN32: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-O2: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-g: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-pipe: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wall: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-fexceptions: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X--param=ssp-buffer-size=4: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-mms-bitfields: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-pedantic: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-W: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wformat: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wunused: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wimplicit: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wreturn-type: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wswitch: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wcomment: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wtrigraphs: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wformat: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wchar-subscripts: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wuninitialized: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wparentheses: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wshadow: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wpointer-arith: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wcast-align: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wwrite-strings: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Waggregate-return: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wstrict-prototypes: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wmissing-prototypes: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wnested-externs: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Winline: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-Wredundant-decls: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-MT: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: XSAX.lo: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-MD: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-MP: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X-MF: command not found ./libtool: line 1151: X.deps/SAX.Tpo: No such file or directory ./libtool: line 1151: X-c: command not found ./libtool: line 1203: XSAX.lo: command not found ./libtool: line 1208: libtool: compile: cannot determine name of library object from `': command not found make[2]: *** [SAX.lo] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/erik/rpmbuild/BUILD/libxml2-2.7.2'
[Bug 467416] Review Request: mingw32-cairo - MinGW Windows Cairo library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467416 Bug 467416 depends on bug 478640, which changed state. Bug 478640 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-dlfcn - Implements a wrapper for dlfcn (dlopen dlclose dlsym dlerror) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478640 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Erik van Pienbroek erik-fed...@vanpienbroek.nl 2009-01-23 13:14:16 EDT --- The compilation of this package fails when the Linux version of fontconfig and freetype are installed: i686-pc-mingw32-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I. -I/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/libpng12 -Wall -Wextra -Wsign-compare -Werror-implicit-function-declaration -Wpointer-arith -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -Wpacked -Wswitch-enum -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wstrict-aliasing=2 -Winit-self -Wunsafe-loop-optimizations -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wold-style-definition -Wno-missing-field-initializers -Wno-unused-parameter -Wno-attributes -Wno-long-long -Winline -fno-strict-aliasing -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -mms-bitfields -MT cairo-type1-subset.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/cairo-type1-subset.Tpo -c cairo-type1-subset.c -DDLL_EXPORT -DPIC -o .libs/cairo-type1-subset.o In file included from cairo-ft-private.h:40, from cairo-type1-subset.c:54: cairo-ft.h:46:35: error: fontconfig/fontconfig.h: No such file or directory cairo-ft.h:47:22: error: ft2build.h: No such file or directory To fix this, the option '--disable-ft' needs to the added to the %configure With this change, the %install command to remove the cairo-freetype pkgconfig file can also be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480870] Review Request: crda - An 802.11 wireless regulatory compliance daemon
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480870 Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com 2009-01-23 13:44:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) Spec URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/crda.spec SRPM URL: http://linville.fedorapeople.org/crda-v0.9.5_2009_01_15-2.fc10.src.rpm Did I do the /usr/lib/crda directory ownership right? Or is there more magic? Looks good. I'll propose the last_rule thing to the upstream project. Is it worth us carrying a patch for it? Not really, no. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225694] Merge Review: dictd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225694
Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org 2009-01-23 13:52:23 EDT
---
Thank you for the update.
I note you are not using %{?dist} tag, however this is not a blocker.
There is a test suite provided in the package, but it won't run correctly as
dictd drops privileges to user nobody and won't be able to create/append log
file _dictd.log in test/ directory. I'm not sure that's fixable.
Please consider using install -p for install to preserve timestamps of
installed
files.
Review:
OK source files match upstream:
1b316bf797ff239eb87110c18cd7d5d9 dictd-1.11.0.tar.gz
d1883d09f65179a3b6aa16579cb5a7e9 libmaa-1.1.0.tar.gz
OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros
consistently.
OK summary is OK.
OK description is OK.
OK dist tag is not present.
OK build root is OK.
OK license field matches the actual license.
OK license is open source-compatible.
OK license text included in package.
OK BuildRequires are proper.
OK compiler flags are appropriate.
OK %clean is present.
OK package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
OK package installs properly.
OK debuginfo package looks complete.
OK rpmlint is silent.
OK final provides and requires are sane:
config(dictd) = 1.11.0-2
dictd = 1.11.0-2
dictd(x86-64) = 1.11.0-2
=
/bin/sh
chkconfig
config(dictd) = 1.11.0-2
initscripts
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libdbi.so.0()(64bit)
libz.so.1()(64bit)
N/A %check is not present. Provided test suite won't correctly run
N/A no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
OK owns the directories it creates.
OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
OK no duplicates in %files.
OK file permissions are appropriate.
OK scriptlets present look OK
OK initscript looks OK.
OK code, not content.
OK documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
OK no headers.
OK no pkgconfig files.
OK no static libraries.
OK no libtool .la files.
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477818] Review Request: gsql - Integrated database development tool for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477818 Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||co...@gnome.eu.org AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|co...@gnome.eu.org Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225660] Merge Review: crash
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225660 --- Comment #6 from Dave Anderson ander...@redhat.com 2009-01-23 14:06:25 EDT --- As of relying on a bundled application, this is not usually permitted in Fedora and therefore they should be discussed. The crash utility package is essentially built around, on-top-of, wrapped-around, or however you want to put it, and it's designed that way on purpose. There's no way it's ever going to be unbundled. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-01-23 14:11:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) Anyway: Is there any way to see the (latest) build logs at Koji? I've tried looking for mrpt without success... Here you mean that you want to see my scratch build of your latest mrpt srpm on koji? Currently mrpt is not imported into Fedora (as it is currently under review here), so searching mrpt on koji returns nothing. For my scratch build, please check: For F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1076797 For F-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1076808 ! Note For my scratch build on koji done less than one week ago, they are preserved on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/mtasaka/ I guess the builds there are different from those in my Fedora. For example, there's a -g and a -mcpu making their way to CFLAGS and I cannot find where to remove it (some rpm config file?), and I wondered if they're not in the Koji builds. For -mcpu I don't know, however for -g %optflags also contains -g option and this must not be removed (to create debuginfo rpm) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225660] Merge Review: crash
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225660 --- Comment #7 from Dave Anderson ander...@redhat.com 2009-01-23 14:20:56 EDT --- I reviewed the upstream version because by definition so to say Fedora wants to have the latest version of the software, and the content in the cvs is very old. I assumed it will be easier for you to maintain a single or at least very similar spec for both places. Not really. The upstream src.rpm (and its minimal .spec file) was added as a convenience to those users who prefer that format to the tar.gz file. I apologize if I made an error by this assumption. Let me know what is the URL of the files that I should have reviewed and I will do it. The content in the cvs (Fedora) is currently based upon the upstream 4.0-6.3 release from last April, and its .spec file updated when Tom Calloway rebuilt it as 4.0-7 this past August. Anyway, the .spec file in the devel branch was -- as I recall -- carried over from a RHEL package version some years ago. Anyway, that's the only .spec file I've ever touched w/respect to Fedora, and that's the one that I would have presumed would be the one that would be review-able. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467405] Review Request: mingw32-libxml2 - MinGW Windows libxml2 XML processing library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467405 --- Comment #10 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-01-23 14:21:48 EDT --- Thanks for looking at this Erik. I'm just now rebuilding the entire package set against Rawhide and will fix the bugs along the way. I'll post here when I have new packages which work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477144] Review Request: eclipse-cmakeed - CMake Editor plug-in for Eclipse
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477144
Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||oget.fed...@gmail.com
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|oget.fed...@gmail.com
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-01-23
14:39:00 EDT ---
Here's the review for this one.
* The prebuilt binaries need removed in %prep
./com.cthing.cmakeed.site/plugins/com.cthing.cmakeed.core_1.0.1.jar
./com.cthing.cmakeed.site/plugins/com.cthing.cmakeed.ui_1.0.1.jar
./com.cthing.cmakeed.site/features/com.cthing.cmakeed.feature_1.0.1.jar
* I believe that
./com.cthing.cmakeed.ui/doc/*
should go to %doc. These don't end up in the RPM otherwise, right?
* Please make the description span across 80 columns. It'll look nicer.
* Macros should be used consistently. You use %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixed. This needs corrected. You should also use %{__install} for consistency.
* Please make use of the %{version} macro, e.g. in Source0
* Latest version must be packaged. Please update to 1.1.1
* There is no license file in the sources. The upstream should be notified to
include a license file.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476973] Review Request: eclipse-rpmstubby - Rpm specfile generator for Eclipse features
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476973
Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||oget.fed...@gmail.com
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|oget.fed...@gmail.com
Flag||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-01-23
14:37:18 EDT ---
I made the review. There are a few minor things to go over:
* Two Changelogs need packaged:
./org.eclipse.linuxtools.rpmstubby-feature/ChangeLog
./org.eclipse.linuxtools.rpmstubby/ChangeLog
* I think URL needs to be:
http://www.eclipse.org/linuxtools/projectPages/rpmstubby/
? Could you provide a download location at the project homepage so we don't
need to use this fetch script?
* Macros should be used consistently. You use %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
mixed. This needs corrected. You should also use %{__install} for consistency.
* Summary looks awkward to me, maybe it should be shortened to:
Rpm specfile generator for Eclipse
These are all easy to do. I'm approving the package now.
This package (eclipse-rpmstubby) is APPROVED by oget
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226528] Merge Review: virt-manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226528
Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
CC||mar...@redhat.com
Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE
--- Comment #5 from Mark McLoughlin mar...@redhat.com 2009-01-23 14:50:44
EDT ---
Okay, fixes were:
-ln -s %{_bindir}/consolehelper $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/%{name}
+ln -s ../bin/consolehelper $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/%{name}
-%{_sysconfdir}/pam.d/%{name}
+%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/pam.d/%{name}
Closing
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |ctan-musixtex-fonts - Adobe |ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type |Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX |1 versions of MusiXTeX |fonts |fonts Alias||ctan-musixtex-fonts Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-01-23 15:02:04 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ctan-musixtex-fonts Short Description: Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355
Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi
--- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-01-23 15:11:24
EDT ---
URL:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libnurbs/nurbs%2B%2B-3.0.11.tar.bz2?modtime=1022212800big_mirror=0
Source: nurbs++-3.0.11.tar.bz2
should be
URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/libnurbs/
Source: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libnurbs/nurbs++-%{version}.tar.bz2
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481056] Review Request: squeak-vm - a Smalltalk interpreter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481056 --- Comment #5 from Gavin Romig-Koch ga...@redhat.com 2009-01-23 16:06:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) BTW there was a closed ticket with attempt to submit this package already. I thought there are some license issues - are they resolved (if any). Yes, there were licensing issues, they have been resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481034] Review Request: coccinelle - Semantic patching for Linux (spatch)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481034 --- Comment #8 from Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com 2009-01-23 16:11:50 EDT --- Richard, In the Debian review ticket for coccinelle (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=512658) they noticed that the sources include a slightly modified copy of pycaml and the library part of menhir. I did not find any of these two packages currently in Fedora, so it would not cause a duplication, but still it would be nicer to have pycaml and menhir packaged separately if possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-01-23 16:17:03 EDT --- I guess I need to add that I removed the Adobe bits from the summary and description to avoid trademark issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225698] Merge Review: dmidecode
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225698 Dave Jones da...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|a...@redhat.com,| |da...@redhat.com, | |pra...@redhat.com | AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pra...@redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 --- Comment #20 from Jose Luis joseluisblan...@gmail.com 2009-01-23 17:48:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) For my scratch build, please check: For F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1076797 For F-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1076808 ! Note For my scratch build on koji done less than one week ago, they are preserved on: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/mtasaka/ That was exactly what I was looking for, thanks! Now with the build.log I understand that about FORTIFY :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481389] New: Review Request: beesu - Beesu is a wrapper around su
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: beesu - Beesu is a wrapper around su https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481389 Summary: Review Request: beesu - Beesu is a wrapper around su Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: honeybeehoneyhive-red...@yahoo.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.2shared.com/file/4710092/c00ed859/beesu.html 869a510778a3dc308c44f9b3cf1cde935e4158f9 beesu.spec SRPM URL: http://www.2shared.com/file/4710086/de782d01/beesu-20-1fc10src.html be7fd8990692e33bc92d37fb0849575b8c8f62f1 beesu-2.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Beesu is a wrapper around su and works with consolehelper under Fedora to let you have a graphic interface like gksu. It's to replace the missing gksu in Fedora. Lots of users are happy of beesu!! Here is the HOW-TO/homepage about beesu: http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=201579 Some comments: http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showpost.php?p=1120956postcount=30 http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showpost.php?p=1121999postcount=34 http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showpost.php?p=1130642postcount=36 http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showpost.php?p=1154044postcount=38 So, i thought...why not!? it's useful!, so it could be placed into some YUM repo, hopefully!!! bye -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479866] Review Request: eclipse-linuxprofilingframework - Eclipse Linux Tools Profiling Framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479866 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:08:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481070] Review Request: ctan-musixtex-fonts - Type 1 versions of MusiXTeX fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481070 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:15:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480591] Review Request: ctan-kerkis-fonts - Kerkis type 1 fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480591 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:11:54 EDT --- cvs done. Don't forget to follow the end of life procedure for the old procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477338] Review Request: php-pecl-imagick - Provides a wrapper to the ImageMagick library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477338 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:18:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480567] Review Request: dnssec-conf - DNSSEC and DLV configuration and priming tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480567 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:20:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472066] Review Request: python-distutils-extra - Integrate more support into Python's distutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472066 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:19:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:21:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 467403] Review Request: mingw32-libgpg-error - MinGW Windows GnuPGP error library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467403 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:24:32 EDT --- Note however, that mingwmaint doesn't seem to be a valid user to add as a co-maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480552] Review Request: poweradmin - A friendly web-based DNS administration tool for Bert Hubert's PowerDNS server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480552 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:25:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481116] Review Request: mythes-ru - Russian thesaurus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481116 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:28:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480863] Review Request: mythes-ro - Romanian thesaurus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480863 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:27:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481115] Review Request: mythes-sl - Slovenian thesaurus
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481115 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:28:01 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481257] Review Request: perl-Devel-SmallProf - Per-line Perl profiler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481257 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:29:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 477533] Review Request: rubygem-mechanize - A handy web browsing ruby object
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477533 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:26:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473367] Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 --- Comment #15 from Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com 2009-01-23 18:28:15 EDT --- Looks like an ACL is still missing? cvs commit... Access denied: pwouters is not in ACL for rpms/autotrust/devel cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first! cvs commit: saving log message in /tmp/cvsVuHdcH -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:31:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481004] Review Request: pg_top - top for postgresql
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481004 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:33:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ke...@tummy.com --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:35:18 EDT --- Given that fesco wanted tools at the same time, would you like to hold off on cvs until one of those is ready also? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478660] Review Request: dateshift - A date/time test tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478660 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:32:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480485] Review Request: cpmtools - Programs for accessing CP/M disks
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480485 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:38:01 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 455558] Review Request: udns - DNS resolver library for both synchronous and asynchronous DNS queries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=48 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:41:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480528] Review Request: botan - Crypto library written in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480528 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:40:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478398] Review Request: httping - Ping alike tool for http requests
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478398 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:36:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 431013] Review Request: perl-CSS-Squish - Compact many CSS files into one big file
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431013 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 18:41:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 474980] Review Request: ovm - Open Verification Methodology : IEEE 1800 SystemVerilog standard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474980 --- Comment #12 from Chitlesh GOORAH cgoo...@yahoo.com.au 2009-01-23 18:59:52 EDT --- well, it won't happen before 6 months. the intention of pushing it into fedora was to encourage EDA developers develop tools around it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473367] Review Request: autotrust - DNSKEY trust anchor update utility that uses RFC-5011
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473367 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-01-23 19:01:54 EDT --- The job that generates the acl runs every 30min. Please wait a while and try again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225684] Merge Review: devhelp (stalled)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225684 Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mcla...@redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com 2009-01-23 19:13:01 EDT --- This can be approved, I think. The things listed in comment #1 have all been taken care of. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
