[Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 --- Comment #18 from Remi Collet 2009-02-14 02:30:27 EDT --- Grr... .src.cpm seems broken :( And version 2.1.14 available... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 473537] Review Request: jcodings - Java Libraries for Ruby String Encodings
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473537 Conrad Meyer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer 2009-02-13 22:54:57 EDT --- Imported and built in rawhide. Closing. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1126104 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478506] Review Request: trac-customfieldsadmin-plugin - expose ticket custom fields via web admin interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478506 --- Comment #7 from Ian Weller 2009-02-13 22:03:06 EDT --- I'll hopefully be able to get to this tomorrow evening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485007] Review Request: rhnpush - Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485007 --- Comment #3 from Michael Stahnke 2009-02-13 21:48:42 EDT --- Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rhnpush.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rhnpush-0.3.1-4.fc10.src.rpm * Found a better Source URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485007] Review Request: rhnpush - Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485007 --- Comment #2 from Michael Stahnke 2009-02-13 21:31:37 EDT --- Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rhnpush.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rhnpush-0.3.1-3.fc10.src.rpm * I have updated the package slightly. I added a source description, as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL . * I tried to play with %check and tests, but I couldn't them to work. It seems like I am missing a harness setup of some type. I will ping the sw-dev list and see if I can find out anything. Either way, that shouldn't be a blocker for package review. * Man page: It's a little different than many, but certainly not wrong. See (man vim), it looks similar. I think it's because the man page is generated using doc2book on the SGML file. I'd rather just write it in groff, but I am not upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478506] Review Request: trac-customfieldsadmin-plugin - expose ticket custom fields via web admin interface
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478506 --- Comment #6 from Jon Stanley 2009-02-13 21:00:45 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484379] Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a.bad...@gmail.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-02-13 20:30:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485542] Review Request: breip-font - The Breip handwriting-style cursive font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485542 --- Comment #1 from Stephen Carter 2009-02-13 20:12:56 EDT --- I also have another font awaiting review, which you can find here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484057 . I need two clean font package submissions to be sponsored, and this is my second package. Comments and reviews are welcome! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471520] Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471520 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 20:13:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485542] Review Request: breip-font - The Breip handwriting-style cursive font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485542 Stephen Carter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484057] Review Request: epigrafica-fonts - The Epigrafica font family.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484057 --- Comment #2 from Stephen Carter 2009-02-13 20:11:42 EDT --- My second font submission can be found here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485542 . I will be cleaning up this one and uploading fresh packages very soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485542] New: Review Request: breip-font - The Breip handwriting-style cursive font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: breip-font - The Breip handwriting-style cursive font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485542 Summary: Review Request: breip-font - The Breip handwriting-style cursive font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: scart...@learn.senecac.on.ca QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~scarter4/breip-font.spec SRPM URL: http://matrix.senecac.on.ca/~scarter4/breip-font-0.5.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Breip is a handwriting font made by Alan Hussey using the handwriting of his friend Adam Breipohl, hence the name 'breip'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 471520] Review Request: rubygem-simple-rss - A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471520 Michael Stahnke changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Michael Stahnke 2009-02-13 20:11:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: rubygem-simple-rss Short Description: A simple, flexible, extensible, and liberal RSS and Atom reader for Ruby Owners: stahnma kanarip Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485424] Review Request: eclipse-birt - Eclipse-based reporting system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485424 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 19:48:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472525] Review Request: kio_sysinfo - KIO slave which shows basic system information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472525 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 19:43:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466953] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Utils - NOCpulse utility packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466953 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 19:44:57 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480944] Review Request: perl-Test-Harness-Straps - Detailed analysis of test results
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480944 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 19:46:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484704] Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-02-13 19:40:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 Stuart D Gathman changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(stu...@gathman.or | |g) | --- Comment #27 from Stuart D Gathman 2009-02-13 19:27:04 EDT --- Swamped at my paying job. Debating whether to try and submit milter/milter-spf [http://bmsi.com/python/milter.html] as my test (it would be nice to have a package that actually *uses* pymilter as part of Fedora). The problem is, I already know they don't currently meet Fedora packaging guidelines. I suppose if I "flunk" I can keep trying. I would also need to upgrade my home server to Fedora 10 to test running everything under Fedora. (Currently runs in production on EL3, EL4, EL5). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485001] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Emulate-Class-Accessor-Fast - Emulate Class::Accessor::Fast behavior using Moose attributes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485001 --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-13 18:19:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Urgh... > Please filter out perl(Test::More) and perl(Test::Exception) from the > automatic > Requires. A quick glance shows no use for them except in the tests. Where are you seeing these? The srpm depends on them, but I can't find them generated anywhere else... (on my F-10 system, at least) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483025] Review Request: imms - Adaptive playlist framework tracking and adapting to your listening patterns
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483025
--- Comment #3 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-02-13 18:10:11
EDT ---
Yep, I'm quoting the answer to my email:
"
Hey, Milos,
I fixed compilation with recent Audacious versions in 3.1.0-rc7.
[http://www.luminal.org/files/imms/imms-3.1.0-rc7.tar.bz2]
I am fairly sure all the code in question is GPL. I made sure of that
before including it.
I do not have the time to follow up with the authors of the code right
now, but I'm certainly willing to apply any patches to clarify
licenses.
Perhaps, Artur, the Debian IMMS maintainer (cc'ed) can help you there.
He already did some work on getting explicit releases from the
authors.
Have fun,
Michael.
"
It seems that all the thins are GPL indeed...looking into debian(lenny) imms
packages, I found following:
"
+Author: Michael Grigoriev
+
+Copyright (C) 2003-2005 Michael Grigoriev
+
+With the following exceptions:
+
+md5.{h,c} (added ability to restrict maximum size to process)
+from GNU textutils
+levenshtein.{h,c} (stripped down)
+python-Levenshtein library
+by David Necas (Yeti)
+regexx.{h,cc} (stripped down)
+Regexx - Regular Expressions C++ solution
+by Gustavo Niemeyer
+xidle.{h,cc}
+Borrows from xautolock 2.1
+by Michel Eyckmans (MCE)
+normal.h
+by by Agner Fog
"
I'll prepare patches and request adding a LICENSE file into the source tarball
and license information to all the source files (and merging the gcc43 patch of
course too). I'd also include the above information as %doc. Would it be ok
then?
Regarding the review: the audacious plugin is working now, updated link are
here:
New SPEC: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/imms/imms.spec
New SRPM:
http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/imms/imms-3.1.0-0.3.rc7.fc10.src.rpm
Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1125850
As there are now both xmms and audacious plugins available, I'm considering
splitting the package into a main one and two subpackages (-xmms, -audacious),
I'm just not sure whether this wouldn't hit the usability from the user point
of view too much.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Andreas Thienemann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andr...@bawue.net --- Comment #27 from Andreas Thienemann 2009-02-13 17:38:09 EDT --- Hello Gratien, Robert was kind enough to ask me whether I'd be willing to sponsor this. A cursory glance at the spec looks good, but please add some linebreaks and \ to the long lines in the %install part of the .spec file. This makes things much easier to read. The review looks okay so far, seems the .spec has come a long way. :) As soon as Robert indicates he's finished I'll do a final test of the software and recheck the review. After that, I'd be happy to sponsor you. That okay with you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485159] Review Request: anki - Flashcard program for using space repetition learning
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485159 --- Comment #1 from Christian Krause 2009-02-13 17:13:32 EDT --- I've updated the packages: - fixed an installation problem - corrected the license field with the help of Jason Tibbitts (fedora-legal mailing list) Spec URL: http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~tiwi/anki.spec SRPM URL: http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~tiwi/anki-0.9.9.6-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #28 from David Halik 2009-02-13 16:46:24 EDT --- Based off of the method used in the Thunderbird package, the internal provides are now filtered out properly. This avoids any potential conflicts between system libraries, such as libxul, and those packaged with Songbird. http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird.spec http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird-1.0.0-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189
--- Comment #26 from Robert Scheck 2009-02-13
16:39:21 EDT ---
Right, I just wanted to make sure, that /usr/share/rear usually doesn't get
touched at all and dynamic stuff ends in /var or the config stuff in /etc.
I didn't get the SVN/CVS suggestion.
I think, the "rear mkrpm" thing can easily solved with some RPM macros inside
of the spec file which do just the right thing, if it is executed on Fedora
and/or RHEL. Would that be acceptable for you? E.g.
%if 0%{?fedora}%{?rhel}
rm -f unwanted-file-at-fedora
%endif
Or
%if 0%{?fedora}%{?rhel}
# Fedora specific stuff
%else
# Other distribution stuff
%endif
If that's okay, I would try to provide you a working example. Hopefully I got
your point correct, but I think so. Just let me know...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480103] Review Request: bnIRC - An ncurses based IRC client and modular IRC framework.(Need Sponsorship. First time Packager)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480103 --- Comment #7 from Tom Wisniewski 2009-02-13 15:57:14 EDT --- Alright. Finally found some free time to work on this again. I have split the rpm into two packages, the rpm and a devel rpm. The links are below. Please have a look and let me know what else needs to be changed. Thanks again for all suggestions/feedback. Spec URL: http://dev.zerogin.com/bnIRC.spec RPM URL: http://dev.zerogin.com/bnIRC-1.1.1-5.fc10.i386.rpm SRPM URL: http://dev.zerogin.com/bnIRC-1.1.1-5.fc10.src.rpm DEVEL RPM URL: http://dev.zerogin.com/bnIRC-devel-1.1.1-5.fc10.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485186] Review Request: perl-MouseX-Types - Organize your Mouse types in libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485186 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-13 15:38:23 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484975] Review Request: perl-Scope-Upper - Act on upper scopes
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484975 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-13 15:38:28 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485015] Review Request: perl-Class-C3-Adopt-NEXT - Reduce one's dependency on NEXT
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485015 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-02-13 15:38:19 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #28 from Dodji Seketeli 2009-02-13 14:40:33 EDT --- For the info problem, I will submit a bug report to upstream. As for the second review request, I have just filed a new one at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485496. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485424] Review Request: eclipse-birt - Eclipse-based reporting system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485424 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-02-13 14:13:02 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: eclipse-birt Short Description: Eclipse-based reporting system Owners: akurtakov Branches: InitialCC: akurtakov -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485496] New: Review request of geglmm - the C++ Binding to the GEGL library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review request of geglmm - the C++ Binding to the GEGL library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485496
Summary: Review request of geglmm - the C++ Binding to the GEGL
library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: do...@redhat.com
QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dseketel/rpms/geglmm/geglmm.spec-0.0.22-1
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dseketel/rpms/geglmm/geglmm-0.0.22-1.src.rpm
Description:
This is the C++ binding of the GEGL graph based image processing framework.
This bindings adhere to the APIs of the gtkmm2 library.
I have put the result of rpmlint at
http://people.redhat.com/dseketel/rpms/geglmm/rpmlint-output-geglmm.spec-0.0.22-1.txt.
It's spitting an only-non-binary-in-usr-lib error, and I think it's because of
the things that are being install in %{_libdir}, like the m4 files, the
pkgconfig files and the configuration header files. Those files are necessary,
I think. Isn't rpmlint being a bit too pedantic ?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485496] Review request of geglmm - the C++ Binding to the GEGL library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485496 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||177841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485424] Review Request: eclipse-birt - Eclipse-based reporting system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485424 Andrew Overholt changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-13 13:36:12 EDT --- Thanks. This package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-13 12:57:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Also I do not have a rawhide system handy. Did you test it > on rawhide already? Like other packages I reviewed I don't know how to use this software so I did just some basic test for this software (like if the software lauches) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-13 12:54:37 EDT --- Then: - NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check "No one is reviewing") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538
Mamoru Tasaka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
--- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-13
12:54:06 EDT ---
For 0.4.4-2:
* License
- Although the project URL says this is under GPLv2,
judging from the source tarball the license tag should
be "GPLv2+"
* Version information is specified only in
src/iptux.cpp, which is under GPLv2+
* Also src/AboutIptux.cpp shows this is under GPLv2+
(this can be seen by Help->About on iptux)
* ref:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F
* BuildRequires
- This srpm won't build without "BR: gettext"
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1125112
* Timestamps
- Please consider to use
--
make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p"
--
to keep timestamps on installed files as much as possible.
This method usually works for Makefiles generated from recent
autotools.
* %{?name}
- I guess using %{name} is enough.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225797] Review Request: gimp-data-extras
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225797 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-13 12:34:29 EDT --- Looks good, thanks. APPROVED; just fix up the release to an integer >= 1 when you check in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 Alex Eskin changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(alexes...@yahoo.c | |om) | --- Comment #11 from Alex Eskin 2009-02-13 12:28:09 EDT --- Sorry, I was away for a bit. I will test your patch and respond to the other comments this weekend. Also I do not have a rawhide system handy. Did you test it on rawhide already? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485424] Review Request: eclipse-birt - Eclipse-based reporting system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485424 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-02-13 12:15:06 EDT --- Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-birt.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-birt-2.3.1-2.fc10.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > - please add a comment stating why we're only building the feature we are Fixed. It was already done but more details added. > - please add information about steps to get us to a full BIRT here: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Eclipse Fixed. Same as previous. > - please add a comment above the one patch stating why we're doing this Fixed. > - let's change the variable "qualifier" to "rhinoqualifier" to avoid confusion Fixed. > - should we be using the same qualifier as BIRT like we do with Mylyn? No. Different BIRT plugins hava different qualifiers so it's not applicable. > > Lines beginning with X need attention; those beginning with * are okay: > > * verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs > X make sure lines are <= 80 characters > - please add some line continuations to fix this where possible Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485420] Review Request: openbios - Open Source implementation of IEEE 1275-1994
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485420 --- Comment #3 from Glauber de Oliveira Costa 2009-02-13 12:07:01 EDT --- Updated: http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/openbios-1.0-0.2.svn450.fc11.src.rpm http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/openbios.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 --- Comment #6 from Glauber de Oliveira Costa 2009-02-13 11:55:54 EDT --- Updated: http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/bochs-bios-2.3.8-0.2.git36989b0d2.fc11.src.rpm http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/bochs-bios.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484933] Review Request: libwps - Library for reading and converting Microsoft Works word processor documents
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484933 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||oget.fed...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-02-13 11:46:25 EDT --- Apart from what Michael said: * The group for the -doc subpackage should probably be Documentation instead of Applications/Publishing. * The source tarball does not have the proper timestamp. You can use, for example wget -N http://URLtoSOURCEfile to get it with the right timestamp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 --- Comment #7 from Eduardo Habkost 2009-02-13 11:21:33 EDT --- %changelog seems to be in reverse order. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 --- Comment #5 from Glauber de Oliveira Costa 2009-02-13 11:14:57 EDT --- wrt setup: Maybe we could use it, but what would it buy us? the rpm directives seem to be quite arcane, I believe this is much cleaner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 --- Comment #6 from Glauber de Oliveira Costa 2009-02-13 11:04:22 EDT --- Ok, Updated it. You can grab: http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/vgabios-0.6-0.2beta.fc11.src.rpm http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/vgabios.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484379] Review Request: hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts - A sans-serif font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484379 Paul Lange changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Paul Lange 2009-02-13 11:05:59 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: hartke-aurulent-fonts (change to hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts) New Branches: none Owners: palango I did a mistake with the package name when filling it into the Request. Sorry for that! Could you please rename the package to hartke-aurulent-sans-fonts . Thank you very much and sorry for the circumstances. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485424] Review Request: eclipse-birt - Eclipse-based reporting system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485424
Andrew Overholt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||overh...@redhat.com
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|overh...@redhat.com
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-02-13 11:00:31
EDT ---
- please add a comment stating why we're only building the feature we are
- please add information about steps to get us to a full BIRT here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Eclipse
- please add a comment above the one patch stating why we're doing this
- let's change the variable "qualifier" to "rhinoqualifier" to avoid confusion
- should we be using the same qualifier as BIRT like we do with Mylyn?
Lines beginning with X need attention; those beginning with * are okay:
* verify the final provides and requires of the binary RPMs
X make sure lines are <= 80 characters
- please add some line continuations to fix this where possible
* package successfully compiles and builds
* BuildRequires are proper
* macros fine
* package is named appropriately
* it is legal for Fedora to distribute this
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* specfile name matches %{name}
* md5sum matches upstream
* skim the summary and description for typos, etc.
* summary and description good
* correct buildroot
* %{?dist} used correctly
* license text included in package and marked with %doc
* packages meets FHS (http://www.pathname.com/fhs/)
* rpmlint on .srpm gives no output
* changelog format okay
* Summary tag does not end in a period
* no PreReq
* specfile is legible
* specfile written in American English
* no -doc sub-package necessary
* not native, so no rpath, static linking, etc.
* no config files
* not a GUI app
* no -devel necessary
* install section begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot}
* no translations so no locale handling
* no Requires(pre,post)
* package not relocatable
* package contains code
* package owns all directories and files
* no %files duplicates
* file permissions fine
* %clean present
* %doc files do not affect runtime
* not a web app
* package includes license text in the package and marks it with %doc
* run rpmlint on the binary RPMs => no output
$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/eclipse-birt-2.3.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm
eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/batik-xml.jar
../../../../../java/batik/batik-xml.jar
eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/batik-parser.jar
../../../../../java/batik/batik-parser.jar
eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/fop.jar
../../../../../java/fop.jar
eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/batik-svg-dom.jar
../../../../../java/batik/batik-svg-dom.jar
eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/org.apache.xml.resolver_1.2.0.jar
../../../../../java/xml-commons-resolver.jar
eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/javax.xml_1.3.4.jar
../../../../../java/xml-commons-apis.jar
eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/xml-commons-apis-ext.jar
../../../../../java/xml-commons-apis-ext.jar
eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/batik-dom.jar
../../../../../java/batik/batik-dom.jar
eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/org.apache.xerces_2.9.0.jar
../../../../../java/xerces-j2.jar
eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/batik-svggen.jar
../../../../../java/batik/batik-svggen.jar
eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/batik-awt-util.jar
../../../../../java/batik/batik-awt-util.jar
eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/eclipse/dropins/rhino/eclipse/plugins/org.mozilla.rhino_1.6.7.v20080214/lib/js.jar
../../../../../../../java/js.jar
eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/batik-swing.jar
../../../../../java/batik/batik-swing.jar
eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/batik-css.jar
../../../../../java/batik/batik-css.jar
eclipse-birt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/eclipse/dropins/birt/eclipse/plugins/org.apache.c
[Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Gratien D'haese changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(gratien.dha...@it | |3.be) | --- Comment #25 from Gratien D'haese 2009-02-13 10:58:46 EDT --- Hi all, thank you (Robert) for taking a closer look into rear - much appreciated - the goal is indeed to make the software cleaner (and better). As Schlomo (in #24) already mentioned the doc files are kept double for the simple reason that it is very easy to make a new 'in-house' rpm for example (with the command 'rear mkrpm'). However, if we must exclude them, we can of course. In that case the customers who want to build their own in-house rpms should work with a tar-ball of rear instead. Less convenient I think, but not impossible. We could also provide SVN/CVS to accomplish this. What does fedora recommend? In the rpmls output all directories have mode 755. I think Robert question was to check if the /usr/share/rear directory was meant to be in read-only mode. The short answer is yes. During a normal run (mkrescue/mkbackup workflow) rear will not write nor modify anything under /usr/share/rear. We have /var/rear which will be used to create the recovery information under. Do not hesitate to ask if you need more clarification. We're happy to answer and to comply as much as possible to fedora's rules. best regards, Gratien -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(br...@gnoll.org) --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-13 10:49:19 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478470] Review Request: mrpt - The Mobile Robot Programming Toolkit (MRPT)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478470 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(joseluisblan...@g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-13 10:48:36 EDT --- (The submitter replied to me that update will come in a few days) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 463767] Review Request: cloog - The Chunky Loop Generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463767 --- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-13 10:42:01 EDT --- Well: * Not a blocker, however "rpm -ivv cloog-ppl" bears some warning on info file: - D: adding 4 entries to Filedigests index. D: install: %post(cloog-ppl-0.15-0.3.gitad322.fc11.i386) synchronous scriptlet start D: install: %post(cloog-ppl-0.15-0.3.gitad322.fc11.i386) execv(/bin/sh) pid 5361 + /sbin/ldconfig + /sbin/install-info /usr/share/info/cloog.info /usr/share/info/dir install-info: warning: no info dir entry in `/usr/share/info/cloog.info' - * Usually for a packager needing sponsorship, I request him/her to either - submit another review request - or do a (at least one) pre-review of other person's review request as written on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored . Do you have another review request of yours or review requests on which you did some pre-review? Note: Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check "No one is reviewing") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(alexes...@yahoo.c ||om) --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-13 10:44:10 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476460] Review Request: pymilter - Python interface to sendmail milter API
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476460 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(stu...@gathman.or ||g) --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-13 10:46:36 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485420] Review Request: openbios - Open Source implementation of IEEE 1275-1994
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485420 Mark McLoughlin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mar...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Mark McLoughlin 2009-02-13 10:25:26 EDT --- Reviewers: see bug #464621 for a review of similar package (etherboot) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 Mark McLoughlin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mar...@redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Mark McLoughlin 2009-02-13 10:24:55 EDT --- Reviews: see bug #464621 for a review of similar package (etherboot) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 Mark McLoughlin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mar...@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Mark McLoughlin 2009-02-13 10:25:10 EDT --- Reviewers: see bug #464621 for a review of similar package (etherboot) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485420] Review Request: openbios - Open Source implementation of IEEE 1275-1994
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485420
Eduardo Habkost changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ehabk...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Eduardo Habkost 2009-02-13 10:21:43
EDT ---
> %files
> %defattr(-,root,root,-)
> %dir %{_datadir}/openbios/openbios-sparc32
> %dir %{_datadir}/openbios/openbios-sparc64
> #%dir %{_datadir}/openbios/openbios-ppc
Shouldn't the package own the %{_datadir}/openbios directory?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 --- Comment #4 from Glauber de Oliveira Costa 2009-02-13 10:21:47 EDT --- 1) yeah, we do own vgabios directory. I now remember having this problem with etherboot too, but forgot about it. 2) Forgot again 3) Got from a template, slipped through my fingers. I'll update the packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 --- Comment #3 from Eduardo Habkost 2009-02-13 10:18:44 EDT --- > %doc Uh? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 --- Comment #2 from Eduardo Habkost 2009-02-13 10:17:09 EDT --- > %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Prepping_BuildRoot_For_.25install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-02-13 10:14:30 EDT --- I will recheck this package once the srpm is renewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 --- Comment #3 from Eduardo Habkost 2009-02-13 10:16:45 EDT --- > %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Prepping_BuildRoot_For_.25install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485418] Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418
Eduardo Habkost changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ehabk...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Eduardo Habkost 2009-02-13 10:13:44
EDT ---
> %files
> %defattr(-,root,root,-)
> %{_datadir}/vgabios/VGABIOS-lgpl-latest.bin
> %{_datadir}/vgabios/VGABIOS-lgpl-latest.cirrus.bin
> %{_datadir}/vgabios/VGABIOS-lgpl-latest.cirrus.debug.bin
> %{_datadir}/vgabios/VGABIOS-lgpl-latest.debug.bin
Your package also owns %{_datadir}/vgabios, doesn't it?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225797] Review Request: gimp-data-extras
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225797 --- Comment #17 from Nils Philippsen 2009-02-13 10:11:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > > I've checked with upstream and they told me I should consider it as GPLv2+. > [...] > > I can attach an IRC log snippet if necessary. > > Can you include that in the package? I checked with spot and he indicated > that > this is OK as long as you're reasonably certain that the person you were > communicating with is the copyright holder. Obviously it will be academic > once > a version is out, but until then we have to clarify the license. I've included it as "license-clarification.txt" in the package and it gets installed along with the other documentation. New files: Spec file: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/gimp-data-extras.spec SRPM file: http://nphilipp.fedorapeople.org/review/gimp-data-extras-2.0.2-0.3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417
--- Comment #2 from Eduardo Habkost 2009-02-13 10:09:37
EDT ---
> mkdir -p prebuilt
> cd prebuilt
> tar -xzf %{SOURCE1}
You can probably use %setup here, with magic parameters to make it create
prebuilt/ and unpack only %{SOURCE1} inside it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485417] Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 Eduardo Habkost changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ehabk...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Eduardo Habkost 2009-02-13 10:05:46 EDT --- > Summary:Portable x86 PC emulator Is bochs-bios a "portable x86 PC emulator"? > Patch0: 0001_bx-qemu.patch I hope this doesn't break any guidelines on naming patches. I think using the package name as a prefix for patch file names is good practice, even if not explicitly required by Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485424] New: Review Request: eclipse-birt - Eclipse-based reporting system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-birt - Eclipse-based reporting system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485424 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-birt - Eclipse-based reporting system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: akurt...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-birt.spec SRPM URL: http://akurtakov.fedorapeople.org/eclipse-birt-2.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: BIRT is an Eclipse-based open source reporting system for web applications, especially those based on Java and J2EE. BIRT has two main components: a report designer based on Eclipse, and a runtime component that you can add to your app server. BIRT also offers a charting engine that lets you add charts to your own application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485416] Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC for the MSP430
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485416 --- Comment #2 from Steve Whitehouse 2009-02-13 09:40:24 EDT --- Ok, I'll try and find time to have a look at this over the weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485418] New: Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485418 Summary: Review Request: vgabios - vga option rom for bochs/qemu Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gco...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/vgabios.spec SRPM URL: http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/vgabios-0.6-0.1beta.fc11.src.rpm Description: vgabios is an LPGL implementation of a bios for a video card. It is tied to plex86/bochs, althoug it will likely work on other emulators. It is not intended for use in real cards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485416] Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC for the MSP430
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485416 --- Comment #1 from Robert Spanton 2009-02-13 09:32:58 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=331830) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=331830) koji ppc64 build.log ending in failure. As documented in specfile, build fails in koji for ppc64. I attach the build.log for this failure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485420] New: Review Request: openbios - Open Source implementation of IEEE 1275-1994
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: openbios - Open Source implementation of IEEE 1275-1994 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485420 Summary: Review Request: openbios - Open Source implementation of IEEE 1275-1994 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gco...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/openbios.spec SRPM URL: http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/openbios-1.0-0.1.svn450.fc11.src.rpm Description: The OpenBIOS project provides you with most free and open source Open Firmware implementations available. Here you find several implementations of IEEE 1275-1994 (Referred to as Open Firmware) compliant firmware. Among its features, Open Firmware provides an instruction set independent device interface. This can be used to boot the operating system from expansion cards without native initialization code. It is Open Firmware's goal to work on all common platforms, like x86, AMD64, PowerPC, ARM and Mips. With its flexible and modular design, Open Firmware targets servers, workstations and embedded systems, where a sane and unified firmware is a crucial design goal and reduces porting efforts noticably. Open Firmware is found on many servers and workstations and there are sever commercial implementations from SUN, Firmworks, CodeGen, Apple, IBM and others. In most cases, the Open Firmware implementations provided on this site rely on an additional low-level firmware for hardware initialization, such as coreboot or U-Boot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485416] New: Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC for the MSP430
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC for the MSP430 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485416 Summary: Review Request: msp430-gcc - Cross compiling GNU GCC for the MSP430 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rspan...@zepler.net QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/mspgcc/msp430-gcc.spec SRPM URL: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/mspgcc/msp430-gcc-3.2.3-1.20090210cvs.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is a Cross Compiling version of GNU GCC, which can be used to compile for the msp430 platform, instead of for the native i386 platform. The mspgcc project has maintained patches against gcc 3.2.3 for a long time. The documented procedure for installing mspgcc is taking their patches and applying them against gcc. I based this on the avr-gcc spec. One rpmlint warning: msp430-gcc.spec:46: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep sed -e 's,find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT,find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%_bindir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%_libexecdir,' $a > $b I don't believe this error is fatal. The script needs to modify the os_install_post script so that the build system doesn't try to process the msp430 binaries with the tools for the host's architecture. Build fails on ppc64 in koji, but succeeds on all the other arches (I shall attach the error message to this bug shortly). I'd really appreciate a review of this. Thanks :-D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485417] New: Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485417 Summary: Review Request: bochs-bios - bios implementation from the bochs project Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gco...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/bochs-bios.spec SRPM URL: http://glommer.fedorapeople.org/bochs-bios-2.3.8-0.1.git36989b0d2.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is the BIOS to be used in the Bochs Project -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484704] Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704 Sergio Pascual changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Sergio Pascual 2009-02-13 09:15:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libapogee Short Description: Library for Apogee CCD Cameras Owners: sergiopr Branches: F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472525] Review Request: kio_sysinfo - KIO slave which shows basic system information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472525 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-13 09:12:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: kio_sysinfo Short Description: KIO slave which shows basic system information Owners: jreznik ltinkl kkofler rdieter than Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added CC||allis...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-13 09:07:38 EDT --- koji scratch build in dist-f11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1124686 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472525] Review Request: kio_sysinfo - KIO slave which shows basic system information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472525 --- Comment #5 from Lukáš Tinkl 2009-02-13 09:07:12 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484704] Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-02-13 08:56:23 EDT --- Ok, thank you! - license is OK - build is OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485007] Review Request: rhnpush - Package uploader for the RHN Satellite/Spacewalk Server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485007 Marcela Maslanova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mmasl...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-02-13 08:46:35 EDT --- FAIL source files match upstream The source should be written as whole path. OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field (same as Perl) matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1124650 OK debuginfo package isn't need. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. Shouldn't be test executed as a part of build process? (btw you have ugly man page of rhnpush the synopsis part.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472525] Review Request: kio_sysinfo - KIO slave which shows basic system information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472525
Lukáš Tinkl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Lukáš Tinkl 2009-02-13 08:37:56 EDT ---
RPMLINT:
[lti...@localhost ~/tmp/kio_sysinfo-20081121]$ rpmlint kio_sysinfo
kio_sysinfo.speckio_sysinfo-20081121-1.fc9.src.rpm
[lti...@localhost ~/tmp/kio_sysinfo-20081121]$ rpmlint
kio_sysinfo-20081121-1.fc9.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file,
and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need
a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation.
The package cleanly built and meets all the required MUST's with the above
exception, I still think it's not necessary to do desktop-file-install as this
application provides a service, not a standalone application.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466953] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Utils - NOCpulse utility packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466953 Miroslav Suchy changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Miroslav Suchy 2009-02-13 08:23:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-NOCpulse-Utils Short Description: NOCpulse utility packages Owners: msuchy Branches: F-10, EL-4, EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 472525] Review Request: kio_sysinfo - KIO slave which shows basic system information
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472525 Lukáš Tinkl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485207] Review Request: perl-Test-Assert - Assertion methods for those who like JUnit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485207 Allisson Azevedo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485402] Review Request: libytnef - TNEF Stream Parser Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485402 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-02-13 08:13:02 EDT --- this package alrealy exists in fedora, closing ticket https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/libytnef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 Bug 485403 depends on bug 485402, which changed state. Bug 485402 Summary: Review Request: libytnef - TNEF Stream Parser Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485402 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485401] Review Request: KyaPanel - Servers Manager The easy way to admin Postfix and Samba Servers.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485401 Bug 485401 depends on bug 485402, which changed state. Bug 485402 Summary: Review Request: libytnef - TNEF Stream Parser Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485402 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 466953] Review Request: perl-NOCpulse-Utils - NOCpulse utility packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466953 Marcela Maslanova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mmasl...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-02-13 08:08:27 EDT --- OK source files match upstream: fc962eb4a529f467911494d9d508512f OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package isn't need. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. The installation is ugly as was mentioned before. But this is not blocker for a review according to guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485154] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-Cmd - Wrap system command binaries the Moose way
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485154 Allisson Azevedo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485206] Review Request: perl-Hash-Util-FieldHash-Compat - Use Hash::Util::FieldHash or ties, depending on availability
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485206 Allisson Azevedo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 484704] Review Request: libapogee - Library for Apogee CCD Cameras
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484704 --- Comment #3 from Sergio Pascual 2009-02-13 07:34:54 EDT --- Spec URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libapogee.spec SRPM URL: http://sergiopr.fedorapeople.org/libapogee-2.2-2.fc10.src.rpm I have fixed the license and submitted a new bug about library-calling-exit Regarding ppc ppc64, there was already a bug filled about the problem. The solutions seems to be as easy as removing sys/io.h includes. https://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?func=detail&aid=2215787&group_id=90275&atid=593019 So I have created a patch that does exactly that. The package now builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1124525 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||485401 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485401] Review Request: KyaPanel - Servers Manager The easy way to admin Postfix and Samba Servers.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485401 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||485403 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|485401 | Alias||ytnef -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485401] Review Request: KyaPanel - Servers Manager The easy way to admin Postfix and Samba Servers.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485401 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|485403 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485401] Review Request: KyaPanel - Servers Manager The easy way to admin Postfix and Samba Servers.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485401 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||485403 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485403] New: Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 Summary: Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/ytnef/ytnef.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/ytnef/ytnef-2.6-2.src.rpm Description: Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. Can take a TNEF Stream (winmail.dat) sent from Microsoft Outlook (or similar products) and extract the attachments, including construction of Contact Cards & Calendar entries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485402] Review Request: libytnef - TNEF Stream Parser Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485402 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||485403 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||485402 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||485401 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
