[Bug 490580] Review Request: faust - Compiled language for real-time audio signal processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490580
--- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-03-21
02:56:14 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Created an attachment (id=336130)
-- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=336130) [details]
[Review]
Attached is my initial review.
Thank you for the initial review!
Summary:
- rpmlint: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib should be explained or fixed
I fixed this. I put all those files in %{_datadir}/%{name}
- should tools/%{name}2pd-* be %doc?
pd (Pure Data: http://puredata.info/) is a large programming environment that
is unfortunately not packaged in Fedora yet. Thus installing these files in
%{_bindir} will not mean much for the time being (We could even build these
files from sources if we had pd in Fedora.). I am thinking of keeping these in
%doc until the day we have pd packaged (which is no easy task).
- is the doc subpackage not requiring the base package intentional?
Yes that was intentional. I checked the existing doc subpackages we have in
Fedora. Some require the main package, some don't. On a second thought, I
couldn't think of a case where someone would just want the doc subpackage for
faust without needing the main package, so I added the dep.
So here we are:
Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/faust.spec
SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/faust-0.9.9.4-2.b.fc10.src.rpm
Changelog: 0.9.9.4-2.b
- Fix the year of the previous changelog entry
- Install the nonbinary files in %%{_datadir}/%%{name}/
- Add Requires: %%{name}=%%{version}-%%{release} to the doc subpackage
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490317] Review Request: rumor - Really Unintelligent Music transcriptOR
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490317 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-03-21 03:12:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) * rpmlint: TODO rpmlint SPECS/rumor.spec RPMS/i386/rumor-* SRPMS/rumor-1.0.3b-1.fc10.src.rpm SPECS/rumor.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 12, tab: line 1) rumor.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 12, tab: line 1) 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. - just a very minor mixture of spaces and tabs I wonder how this rpmlint survived all my checks. Fixed! * optflags: TODO - I would delete the -O0 in the configure file completely and not substitute it with -O2. If Fedora changes the rpmoptflags, there will be two different -Ox options (the one from rpmoptflags and the one from the configure) (e.g. sed -i 's|-O0||' configure could be used) - the only uncommon gcc option is -ggdb3, but that's no problem, it will only add some more info to the debug infos (e.g. macros) - gdb works still fine with rumor's debuginfo Good point. Thanks for bringing this up. Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/rumor.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/rumor-1.0.3b-2.fc10.src.rpm Thank you Christian, once more :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470914] Review Request: slv2 - An LV2 host library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470914 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-03-21 03:21:40 EDT --- Please backport this patch from the upstream trunk: http://dev.drobilla.net/changeset/1948 from http://dev.drobilla.net/ticket/341 The compilation of slv2 does not fail without it but some plugins which need slv2 as a dependency need this patch, otherwise they won't compile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476359] Review Request: compiz-fusion-unsupported - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476359
--- Comment #3 from Felix Kaechele fe...@fetzig.org 2009-03-21 04:17:17 EDT
---
Here are some things I found that should be fixed before I start the final
review:
- the package misses the BuildDependency mesa-libGL-devel
- the package obsoletes a package that has never been in Fedora
- the gnome subpackage should do a stricter Require. E.g. %{name} =
%{version}-%{release}
- fix the following rpmlint errors:
compiz-fusion-unsupported.src:25: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes
compiz-fusion-plugins-unsupported
compiz-fusion-unsupported.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided
compiz-fusion-plugins-unsupported
compiz-fusion-unsupported-gnome.x86_64: W: no-documentation
compiz-fusion-unsupported-gnome.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/gconf/schemas/compiz-atlantis.schemas
compiz-fusion-unsupported-gnome.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/gconf/schemas/compiz-snow.schemas
compiz-fusion-unsupported-gnome.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/gconf/schemas/compiz-mswitch.schemas
compiz-fusion-unsupported-gnome.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/gconf/schemas/compiz-tile.schemas
compiz-fusion-unsupported-gnome.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/gconf/schemas/compiz-fakeargb.schemas
- you could improve the legibility of the specfile by making use of indentation
but that's just an idea and not required.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486977] Review Request: gnu-free-fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486977 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(l...@jcomserv.net ||) --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-03-21 05:50:58 EDT --- And now you have another kind of dangling symlink /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-gnu-free-mono.conf - /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/gnu-free-mono.conf Would it be so hard to just use the pattern documented in the official spec templates instead of exploring every possible broken alternative? This is getting really old. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 480851] Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 --- Comment #9 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2009-03-21 06:41:04 EDT --- Hm, in my opinion we should insist on a positive result from the built-in tests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486687] Review Request: chisholm-rubbing-fonts - Decorative Sans Serif Font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486687 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-03-21 07:27:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) Enjoyed meeting you all too. Very worth while afternoon. What about the comments form Nicolas Mailhot? Presumably I need to re-do the fontconfig file? If you want it to actually do something, yet Also forgive my ignorance but remind me what/where FAS is again? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Joining_the_Fonts_SIG (I apologize for the long time I spent not checking if this review progressed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-03-21 07:28:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) What is the status of this? The original submitter needs to take care of the review feedback, or someone else needs to submit a competing review request -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486686] Review Request: tkgate - Digital Circuit Simulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486686 Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-03-21 07:35:24 EDT --- Already pushed in stable repos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478434] Review Request: FSMDesigner4 - A Finite State Machine design tool
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478434 Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-03-21 07:34:17 EDT --- The generated FSM is not ready for real life use. I'm closing this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nicolas.mail...@laposte.net |sanjay_an...@yahoo.co.in Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(sanjay_an...@yaho | |o.co.in)| --- Comment #16 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-03-21 07:56:11 EDT --- Hi Ankur Some nitpicking: 1. your common_desc declaration is still using define not global 2. I'm not sure doing %clean after %files is a good idea 3. rpmlint complains of beteckna-fonts.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 31, tab: line 1) 4. rpmlint complains of beteckna-fonts-common.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/beteckna-fonts-common-0.3/CHANGELOG (see the gfs font specs for examples of txt file recoding to UTF-8) 5. it seems none of those fonts have normal minuscules. Therefore it'd probably be better to register them as fantasy not sans-serif in your fontconfig files However the rest of the packaging is sane and much better than some of the stuff I've seen recently and the problems are not worth blocking import ⚶⚶⚶ APPROVED ⚶⚶⚶ Please do consider fixing the remaining small problems however You can now continue from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a As for the warnings emitted by fontforge during build, they unfortunately point problems in the original upstream file. You should relay them to the font author(s) so they get fixed. If you're interested in learning some font creation stuff, you can try to fix them yourself, and create a patch for upstream. eimai and moyogo on #dejavu will usually be helpful to people discovering fontforge. ⇒ REASSIGNING now the review is done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491464] New: Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491464 Summary: Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: edbr...@brandint.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sourceforge.net/project/platformdownload.php?group_id=253689 SRPM URL: http://sourceforge.net/project/platformdownload.php?group_id=253689 Description: sslogger is session keystroke logging utility that allows permitted users to execute commands, or open interactive shells as the superuser or another user as specified by sudo rules in the sudoers file. When used in interactive session mode, sslogger records keystrokes in a spe- cial file. This file can later be reviewed by running a replay command. sslogger also provides the ability to run in command mode in which a command can be executed as another user. This allows sslogger to be used within a script in non-interactive script. This is my first package and I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489117] Review Request: tulrich-tuffy-fonts - Generic sans font
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489117 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net 2009-03-21 08:11:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) I updated the existing wiki page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Tuffy_fonts (is this level of detail ok with you? - I am still new to font packaging) This is good enough (someday we'll figure how to create pretty font previews) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #9 from Ed Brand edbr...@brandint.com 2009-03-21 08:24:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) I really don't understand why you submitted this package 6 more times total 7 times including this?? Make sure you always reports package review request of any package only once. Apologies, first time user of Bugzilla, I figured out what I was doing wrong -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491464] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491464 Ed Brand edbr...@brandint.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Ed Brand edbr...@brandint.com 2009-03-21 08:22:09 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 491430 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #8 from Ed Brand edbr...@brandint.com 2009-03-21 08:22:09 EDT --- *** Bug 491464 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490723] Review Request: R-IRanges - Low-level containers for storing sets of integer ranges
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490723 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-21 08:22:00 EDT --- Package does not build for me - missing BuildRequires? ** R ** inst ** preparing package for lazy loading Error in loadNamespace(i[[1]], c(lib.loc, .libPaths())) : there is no package called 'Matrix' Calls: Anonymous ... namespaceImportFrom - asNamespace - loadNamespace Execution halted ERROR: lazy loading failed for package 'IRanges' ** Removing '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/R-IRanges-1.0.14-1.fc10.x86_64/usr/lib64\ /R/library/IRanges' RPM build errors: error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9f4Ede (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490724] Review Request: R-RUnit - R Unit test framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490724 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-21 08:29:56 EDT --- R packaging guildlines say: Note that other files, such as CONTENTS, INDEX, NAMESPACE, and help/ are not %doc, since proper R functionality depends on their presence. The spec file lists CONTENTS, INDEX and NAMESPACE as %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226146] Merge Review: mkinitrd
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226146 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225978] Merge Review: kudzu
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225978 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225945] Merge Review: jfsutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225945 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-03-21 09:32:52 EDT --- I'll take on the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225945] Merge Review: jfsutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225945
--- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-03-21 09:48:16
EDT ---
rpmlint output:
jfsutils.src:28: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
jfsutils.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Utilities for managing the JFS
filesystem.
jfsutils.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Utilities for managing the JFS
filesystem.
jfsutils-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/jfsutils-1.1.13/include/jfs_dtree.h
jfsutils-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/jfsutils-1.1.13/include/jfs_dinode.h
jfsutils-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/jfsutils-1.1.13/libfs/log_work.c
jfsutils-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/jfsutils-1.1.13/include/jfs_superblock.h
jfsutils-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/jfsutils-1.1.13/mkfs/inodes.h
jfsutils-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/jfsutils-1.1.13/include/jfs_dmap.h
jfsutils-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/jfsutils-1.1.13/libfs/message.c
jfsutils-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/jfsutils-1.1.13/include/jfs_unicode.h
jfsutils-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/jfsutils-1.1.13/include/jfs_xtree.h
jfsutils-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/jfsutils-1.1.13/include/jfs_types.h
jfsutils-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/jfsutils-1.1.13/include/jfs_btree.h
jfsutils-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/jfsutils-1.1.13/libfs/devices.c
jfsutils-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/jfsutils-1.1.13/mkfs/mkfs.c
jfsutils-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/jfsutils-1.1.13/include/jfs_imap.h
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 17 warnings.
- Change buildroot to
%(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XX)
- Use %configure --sbindir=/sbin, and enable smp make.
- Remove
# let brp-compress handle this policy
rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_mandir}/*/*.gz
- Remove buildroot check from clean phase.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225898] Merge Review: imake
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225898 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-03-21 09:52:29 EDT --- I agree. No progress on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com 2009-03-21 10:25:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: beteckna-fonts Short Description: Beteckna sans-serif fonts Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225945] Merge Review: jfsutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225945 --- Comment #5 from Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com 2009-03-21 11:01:20 EDT --- I've done most of this locally now. Still need to look at the weird debuginfo stuff. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478365] Review Request: perl-Verilog-CodeGen - Verilog code generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478365 Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Chitlesh GOORAH chitl...@gmail.com 2009-03-21 10:58:10 EDT --- Kevin, were the cvs branches created ? Checking out module: 'perl-Verilog-CodeGen' cvs server: cannot find module `perl-Verilog-CodeGen' - ignored cvs [checkout aborted]: cannot expand modules ERROR: perl-Verilog-CodeGen module does not exist in cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491425] Review Request: R-RODBC - An ODBC database interface for R
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491425 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490724] Review Request: R-RUnit - R Unit test framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490724 --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2009-03-21 12:37:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) R packaging guildlines say: Note that other files, such as CONTENTS, INDEX, NAMESPACE, and help/ are not %doc, since proper R functionality depends on their presence. The spec file lists CONTENTS, INDEX and NAMESPACE as %doc. These should be fixed, then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490580] Review Request: faust - Compiled language for real-time audio signal processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490580 Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2009-03-21 12:39:08 EDT --- This looks very good, thank you for packaging it for Fedora. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490724] Review Request: R-RUnit - R Unit test framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490724 --- Comment #6 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr 2009-03-21 12:47:22 EDT --- Oups, thanks for pointing this out, I'll fix this. The mail to upstream has been sent yesterday, I'm waiting for an answer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490723] Review Request: R-IRanges - Low-level containers for storing sets of integer ranges
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490723 --- Comment #2 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr 2009-03-21 12:49:21 EDT --- Indeed R-Matrix is needed for build, I will update the spec in that way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490580] Review Request: faust - Compiled language for real-time audio signal processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490580 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil oget.fed...@gmail.com 2009-03-21 12:50:40 EDT --- I thank you for the review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: faust Short Description: Compiled language for real-time audio signal processing Owners: oget Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491425] Review Request: R-RODBC - An ODBC database interface for R
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491425 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se 2009-03-21 12:56:43 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=336169) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=336169) Review comments I attach my review. Package looks good except for some minor license issues that need clarification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490723] Review Request: R-IRanges - Low-level containers for storing sets of integer ranges
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490723 --- Comment #3 from Pierre-YvesChibon pin...@pingoured.fr 2009-03-21 12:56:53 EDT --- SPEC: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-IRanges.spec SRPM: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-IRanges-1.0.14-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744
--- Comment #19 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-21
13:22:35 EDT ---
Hi,
I just asked on fedora-legal-list about the licence of the fonts within root:
It's not a 'Good Licence', so possibly there is no chance of a positive
review!!!
It could be a solution, if we use the X11 Rendering and not the truetypes.
In scientificlinux this package is called 'cernroot'. I like this name, because
there is also a cernlibs package in fedora. Consider a rename ;-)
I have tried to build my on root.spec with much more enabled features, but am
not yet ready to publish it. I'll do so, if it's finished…
ATM %dir %{_datadir}/root/fonts does not work as a result of the bad licence…
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486804] Review Request: libferrisloki - customized build of Loki library from Modern C++ Design for libferris
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486804 --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net 2009-03-21 13:45:05 EDT --- Haven't had a look at the update rpms yet, so just some answers: If possible I'd like to continue using the same spec in Fedora and in the OBS to make openSUSE rpms too. I'm not aware of any policy that disallows this. However, history has shown that it's more convenient to keep spec files distribution-specific and clean. Often distribution-independent spec files are expanded with many conditional sections, which reduce readability and sometime even cause side-effects. This can get really ugly in places where you must use Fedora-specific macros or scriptlet fragments. And also in the %changelog. License: LGPLv2+, Boost, Copyright only I'm not sure how to chain them though. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios %makeinstall https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Ankur Sinha sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|sanjay_an...@yahoo.co.in|sanjay.an...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 225945] Merge Review: jfsutils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225945
--- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-03-21 14:07:44
EDT ---
While you're at it, add %{?dist} to the release tag.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #20 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-21 14:12:23 EDT --- I'm giving up for now... This is my fist try to create a .spec. Earlier, I had anything in one package, and installing and running worked. Now to fullfil the guidelines, I had tried to create a -devel package, too. This spec is not working anymore, but maybe you can get some usefull parts of it... http://www.students.uni-mainz.de/spurath/public/fedora/root.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #21 from juanucl...@gmail.com juanucl...@gmail.com 2009-03-21 14:40:42 EDT --- Hi, So true type fonts are not allowed at all, or just not the MS ones? At some point I found the place where the fonts are called, and I patched the code so that it can call the Liberation Fonts instead. It seemed to have worked, and then I just removed the MS fonts from the package. Is this not an option, according to the legal team? --Juan Carlos -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #19 from Philippe Makowski makowski.fireb...@gmail.com 2009-03-21 15:03:07 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=336173) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=336173) new pec file I made majors changes please check this new version if need, the rpms is there : http://ibphoenix.fr/fichiers/firebird-2.1.1.17910-4.fc10.src.rpm don't hesitate to contact me, I'm a member of the Firebird admin team but please use pmakowski AT ibphoenix DOT com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #336173|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489728] Review Request: kcheckers - Checkers board game
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489728 nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alekc...@googlemail.com --- Comment #2 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com 2009-03-21 15:24:28 EDT --- May be it would be better to install icon in /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/ and update of icon cache. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488124] Review Request: gnubik - 3D interactive graphics puzzle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488124 nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alekc...@googlemail.com --- Comment #15 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com 2009-03-21 15:31:05 EDT --- gnubik desktop icon is not shown. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-03-21 15:34:52 EDT --- Joseph: Can you spin a new package with the deps again and I will look at doing a review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488124] Review Request: gnubik - 3D interactive graphics puzzle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488124 --- Comment #16 from Alexey Torkhov atork...@gmail.com 2009-03-21 15:50:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) gnubik desktop icon is not shown. Icon was put in wrong location. Thanks for catch! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #22 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2009-03-21 16:25:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) So true type fonts are not allowed at all, or just not the MS ones? The MS ones have a 'Bad Licence'. They are not allowd, any other true type fonts with a 'Good Licence' should be allowd. At some point I found the place where the fonts are called, and I patched the code so that it can call the Liberation Fonts instead. It seemed to have worked, and then I just removed the MS fonts from the package. perfect ;-) Is this not an option, according to the legal team? I did't tell them the context, only asked if the MS licence in the folder of the fonts is a 'Good Licence' - No. After removing them, anything else should be allowed (- completely GPLv2 AFAIK) Thomas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #18 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-03-21 16:56:35 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491490] New: Review Request: ghmm - A library with data structures and algorithms for Hidden Markov Models
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: ghmm - A library with data structures and algorithms
for Hidden Markov Models
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491490
Summary: Review Request: ghmm - A library with data structures
and algorithms for Hidden Markov Models
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: kon...@tylerc.org
QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/ghmm.spec
SRPM URL:
http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/ghmm-0.7-1.svn2251.fc10.src.rpm
Description:
The General Hidden Markov Model library (GHMM) is a freely available
LGPL-ed C library implementing efficient data structures and algorithms
for basic and extended HMMs.
It is developed by the Algorithmics group at the Max Planck Institute
for Molecular Genetics.
Features:
* Discrete and continuous emissions
* Mixtures of PDFs for continuous emissions
* Non-homogenous Markov chains
* Pair HMMs (contributed by Genoscope)
* Clustering and mixture modelling for HMMs
* Graphical Editor HMMEd
* Python bindings
* XML-based file format
Note: This is a SAGE package
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/SciTech/SAGE).
Rpmlint output:
ghmm.spec:72: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep -e 's|$(PYTHON) setup.py
install.*$|$(PYTHON) setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root
${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}|' \
ghmm.src:72: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep -e 's|$(PYTHON) setup.py
install.*$|$(PYTHON) setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root
${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}|' \
These are used so that when python libs are built/installed during the make
process, they use the correct flags. RPM_BUILD_ROOT is not defined here, it's
just reference when the makefile is run in %build/%install.
ghmm.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libghmm.so.1.0.0
e...@glibc_2.2.5
Poor programming practice, not a packaging problem.
ghmm-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ghmm-static.x86_64: W: no-documentation
Ignorable.
This builds in koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1252576
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226557] Merge Review: xfig
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226557 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-03-21 17:53:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) should not this bug be close now ? No, Patrice hasn't reviewed the package yet. Patrice: could you finish the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226160] Merge Review: mpage
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226160 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 485596] Review Request: phoronix-test-suite - A Comprehensive Linux Benchmarking System
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485596 --- Comment #10 from Joseph Smidt josephsm...@gmail.com 2009-03-21 18:00:53 EDT --- Thanks for continuing the review. Here are the new packages: Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/phoronix-test-suite.spec SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/phoronix-test-suite-1.6.0-3.fc10.src.rpm Also, the upstream author had this to say: PHP FPDF and PHP Ming aren't external dependencies, but if either of those packages are available in Fedora, they should be Requires for the PTS package. The FPDF package allows the user to save the results to a PDF file and the Ming package allows the user to render Adobe SWF graphs. These aren't required unless you want to use those features, but they should be included if available in Fedora. I do not see either of those packages in Fedora. If I am wrong let me know. Thanks again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226376] Merge Review: rootfiles
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226376 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226376] Merge Review: rootfiles
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226376
--- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-03-21 18:16:02
EDT ---
rpmlint output:
rootfiles.noarch: W: no-documentation
rootfiles.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /root/.bashrc
rootfiles.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /root/.cshrc
rootfiles.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /root/.tcshrc
rootfiles.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /root/.bash_logout
rootfiles.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /root/.bash_profile
rootfiles.noarch: W: no-url-tag
rootfiles.noarch: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile /root/.bash_logout
rootfiles.noarch: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile /root/.bash_profile
rootfiles.noarch: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile /root/.bashrc
rootfiles.noarch: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile /root/.cshrc
rootfiles.noarch: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile /root/.tcshrc
rootfiles.src: W: no-%build-section
rootfiles.src: W: no-url-tag
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 14 warnings.
All of these except the url tag warning are fine due to the special nature of
the package.
- For the url tag, add the disclaimer available at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#We_are_Upstream
to the spec file.
- Add %{?dist} to the release tag.
- Preserve time stamps with install -p.
After these are fixed the package is good to go.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226443] Merge Review: switchdesk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226443 Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jussi.leht...@iki.fi AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jussi.leht...@iki.fi Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #37 from Stephen Lau ste...@songbirdnest.com 2009-03-21 18:26:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #35) Yes, I am aware of this and another bug. Please see the following threads: http://bugzilla.songbirdnest.com/show_bug.cgi?id=15401 http://bugzilla.songbirdnest.com/show_bug.cgi?id=15432 I have been using the gstreamer system library all along, and continue to do so. Even with the latest 0.10.22 gstreamer package the freezing issue is still there. At this point we're going to have to wait on the upstreamed patches. Stevel, comments? Yeah - I'll try to find out more detail this week on what exactly our upstreamed patches are that are missing from the 0.10.22 packages, and what the ETA is on landing them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #23 from Joseph Smidt josephsm...@gmail.com 2009-03-21 18:23:50 EDT --- At some point I found the place where the fonts are called, and I patched the code so that it can call the Liberation Fonts instead. It seemed to have worked, and then I just removed the MS fonts from the package. Do you still have the patch to do this? This, and building on F11 with the gcc-4.4 compilers is what's holding me up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491491] New: Review Request: python-Jinja - A sandboxed python templating engine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-Jinja - A sandboxed python templating engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491491 Summary: Review Request: python-Jinja - A sandboxed python templating engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kon...@tylerc.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/python-Jinja.spec SRPM URL: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/python-Jinja-1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Jinja is a sandboxed template engine written in pure Python licensed under the BSD license. It provides a Django-like non-XML syntax and compiles templates into executable python code. It's basically a combination of Django templates and python code. Note: This is a SAGE (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/SciTech/SAGE) package. Rpmlint output is clean. Builds in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1252615 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490462] Review Request: rpmorphan - List the orphaned rpm packages
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490462 leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||leigh123li...@googlemail.co ||m --- Comment #7 from leigh scott leigh123li...@googlemail.com 2009-03-21 18:36:34 EDT --- Can you add Requires: perl-Tk [r...@localhost Desktop]# rpmorphan -gui WARNING can not find Tk perl module -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 226443] Merge Review: switchdesk
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226443
--- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-03-21 18:40:07
EDT ---
rpmlint output:
switchdesk.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot A desktop environment switcher for
GNOME, KDE and AnotherLevel.
switchdesk.noarch: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog
switchdesk.noarch: W: no-url-tag
switchdesk.src: E: non-utf8-spec-file
/tmp/switchdesk-4.0.9-4.fc10.1.src.rpm.25649/switchdesk.spec
switchdesk.src:31: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes %{name}-kde
switchdesk.src:32: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes %{name}-gnome
switchdesk.src:33: W: unversioned-explicit-provides %{name}-kde
switchdesk.src:34: W: unversioned-explicit-provides %{name}-gnome
switchdesk.src:187: W: macro-in-%changelog _datadir
switchdesk.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot A desktop environment switcher for
GNOME, KDE and AnotherLevel.
switchdesk.src: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog
switchdesk.src: W: no-url-tag
switchdesk-gui.noarch: W: no-documentation
switchdesk-gui.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/switchdesk/backend.py
switchdesk-gui.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot A graphical interface for the
Desktop Switcher.
switchdesk-gui.noarch: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog
switchdesk-gui.noarch: W: no-url-tag
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 12 warnings.
- Need to fix the above errors warnings.
* Summary is inexact: switchdesk also works for Fluxbox, FWVM, Icewm etc.
Maybe generalize it to A desktop environment switcher? Fix also description.
* Since url is missing and we are upstream add disclaimer from
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#We_are_Upstream
- Missing %doc: AUTHORS COPYING Changelog
- Enable smp make or add note if it doesn't work.
- Remove blank space from end of spec file.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491029] Review Request: perl-Data-Denter - An alternative to Data::Dumper and Storable
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491029 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 2009-03-21 19:31:58 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491497] New: Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491497 Summary: Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: m...@flyn.org QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/dmapd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/dmapd-0.0.8-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The dmapd project provides a GObject-based, Open Source implementation of DMAP sharing with the following features: o Support for both DAAP and DPAP o Support for realtime transcoding of media formats not natively supported by clients o Support for many metadata formats, such as those associated with Ogg Vorbis and MP3 (e.g., ID3) o Detection of video streams so that clients may play them as video o Use of GStreamer to support a wide range of audio and video CODECs o Caching of photograph thumbnails to avoid regenerating them each time the server restarts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491425] Review Request: R-RODBC - An ODBC database interface for R
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491425 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490580] Review Request: faust - Compiled language for real-time audio signal processing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490580 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-03-22 01:27:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488359] Review Request: dcbd - daemon and configuration tool for data center bridging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488359 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-03-22 01:30:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 490562] Review Request: renameutils - A set of programs to make renaming of files easier
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490562 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-03-22 01:32:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491201] Review Request: ninvaders - Space Invaders clone written in ncurses for cli gaming
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491201 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-03-22 01:38:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479799] Review Request: ghc-uniplate - Uniform type generic traversals
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479799 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-03-22 01:40:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486390] Review Request: simspark - Spark physical simulation system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486390 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-03-22 01:39:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 469569] Review Request: latex2rtf - LaTeX to RTF converter that handles equations, figures, and cross-references
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469569 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-03-22 01:45:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478365] Review Request: perl-Verilog-CodeGen - Verilog code generator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478365 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-03-22 01:44:32 EDT --- Strange. Try now, I think it's working... not sure what happened there. ;( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470702] Review Request: L-function - L-function calculator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470702 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-03-22 01:46:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 486584] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application - Framework for building reusable web-applications
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486584 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-03-22 01:48:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 476720] Review Request: beteckna-sfd-fonts - Beteckna fonts
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476720 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-03-22 01:49:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489026] Review Request: auto-buildrequires - Work out BuildRequires for rpmbuild automatically
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489026 Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com 2009-03-22 01:50:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
