[Bug 488173] Package Review: ibus-table-erbi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488173 --- Comment #14 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-04-07 02:03:12 EDT --- FYI it couldn't be built atm because dependency problems of its depending packages. Tested in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492990] Review Request: zynjacku - LV2 synths and plugins host
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492990 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493638] Review Request: kcometen4 - An OpenGL screensaver with exploding comets for KDE4
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493638
--- Comment #2 from nucleo alekc...@googlemail.com 2009-04-07 02:25:44 EDT
---
(In reply to comment #1)
MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9]
NOT_DONE
This package doesn't includes any translations files in %{_datadir}/locale/*
%find_lang is useless in this package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files
MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. (see line 34 and 38,
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT ond ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}
This style of defining the rpm Build Root can be used.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging
/Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488173] Package Review: ibus-table-erbi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488173 --- Comment #15 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-04-07 02:28:34 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-erbi-1.1.0.20090407-2.fc11.src.rpm Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-erbi.spec Description: A split from ibus-table-chinese, which was sub-package of ibus-table. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492113] Review Request: mingw32-glibmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492113 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-07 02:29:08 EDT --- mingw32-glibmm24-2.19.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-glibmm24-2.19.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #39 from Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com 2009-04-07 02:35:20 EDT --- Can you post complete spec files instead of patches? It's too hard to track what's a patch to a spec file, vs a patch to the source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491884] Review Request: atasm - 6502 cross-assembler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491884 --- Comment #3 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2009-04-07 02:39:30 EDT --- Thanks for the review, I will update the spec before importing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491884] Review Request: atasm - 6502 cross-assembler
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491884 Dan Horák d...@danny.cz changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2009-04-07 02:40:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: atasm Short Description: 6502 cross-assembler Owners: sharkcz Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #40 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name 2009-04-07 02:49:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #39) Can you post complete spec files instead of patches? It's too hard to track what's a patch to a spec file, vs a patch to the source. http://till.fedorapeople.org/files/xmonad-0.8.1-8.fc10.src/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458402] Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458402 Rahul Sundaram sunda...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(sunda...@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #7 from Rahul Sundaram sunda...@redhat.com 2009-04-07 02:53:27 EDT --- Sorry for the delay folks. This one required quite a bit of reworking http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/griffith.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/griffith-0.9.9-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491694] Review Request: Anyterm - Web based terminal emulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491694 --- Comment #11 from Gianluca Sforna gia...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 02:58:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) Some updates (new spec / srpm has been uploaded) Ok, please remember to bump the release number when you upload a new spec/srpm so I can be sure I'm looking at an updated spec file. - been working w/ the anyterm upstream community to get some changes committed, including some necessary bugfixes, new features, and integration w/ httpd. After this no patches / additional changes should be needed for this Great - because of the previous I don't think anyterm 1.1.29 tarball from the site will cut it, so we'll need to either source this from the version control checkout tarball, or (less preferably) wait for the next release Packaging a SVN checkout is OK; what is (still) not good is that I can't verify your tarball matches upstream. If you want to stick to a svn snapshot until the next release, please pick a suitable revision from upstream, then package it with svn export -r and be sure to update the package version field according to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492974] Review Request: calf - Audio plugins pack
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492974 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mmasl...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com 2009-04-07 03:10:34 EDT --- rpm -ivh /home/marca/calf-0.0.18.3-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \error: Failed dependencies: liblash.so.1()(64bit) is needed by calf-0.0.18.3-1.fc11.x86_64 Shouldn't be lash in requirements for calf package? Also I can't check md5sum because on the upstream page is for download version 0.0.17. Could you send me a link for download 0.0.18? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #16 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala huzai...@redhat.com 2009-04-07 03:13:47 EDT --- So here is what i have done: 1. Bumped to newer upstream 0.8.0.1 after applying the patch Sindre sent. 2. Split the huge rpm into smaller sub-rpms making sure that only those sections which have a dependency [ e.g firefox etc ] would be in a separate rpm. Someone please check if this condition is fully satisfied. SPEC: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/gnome-do-plugins.spec SRPM: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/srpms/gnome-do-plugins-0.8.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm I tried doing a scratch build in koji however it seems that monodevelop does not exists for f11. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1281705name=root.log However it has been built for F11 at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=95516 So most probably it did not end up in the build root. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493957] Review Request: skyviewer - Program to display HEALPix-based skymaps in FITS files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493957 Bug 493957 depends on bug 492164, which changed state. Bug 492164 Summary: Review Request: healpix - Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelization of a sphere https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492164 What|Old Value |New Value Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492164] Review Request: healpix - Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelization of a sphere
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492164 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-04-07 03:17:02 EDT --- Thanks for the review and enhancements, Jussi. Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493530] Review Request: perl-Data-Dumper-Names - Data::Dumper::Names module
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493530 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com 2009-04-07 03:32:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: perl-Data-Dumper-Names Short Description: Data::Dumper like module for printing and eval data structures Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #17 from David Nielsen gnomeu...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 03:33:33 EDT --- Why are you doing all those excludes? They are listed in the subpackages, it should be enough to have them be owned that way. you may also want to move specific buildrequires into the subpackages, that way we can do some neat stuff with flags Shouldn't it depend on monodevelop-devel, not that it would make a difference in finding it. This one smells like a koji error to me, we may need to contact the koji guys if it presists or ask the mailing list. Does it happen in a local mock build as well? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492164] Review Request: healpix - Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelization of a sphere
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492164 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-07 03:53:32 EDT --- healpix-2.11c-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/healpix-2.11c-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #18 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala huzai...@redhat.com 2009-04-07 03:54:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) Why are you doing all those excludes? They are listed in the subpackages, it should be enough to have them be owned that way. Well if you see the file list in the gnome-do-plugin rpm it includes all the files, So if i dont put excludes the files would go into both the sub packge as well as the gnome-do-plugin package. Reference: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/beagle/devel/beagle.spec?revision=1.165view=markup you may also want to move specific buildrequires into the subpackages, that way we can do some neat stuff with flags Make sense, will do that. SPEC: http://huzaifas.fedorapeople.org/spec/gnome-do-plugins.spec However my question is, when the rpm is build from source, you have to build all the sub rpms right? So what is the point in splitting the BRs? Shouldn't it depend on monodevelop-devel, not that it would make a difference in finding it. This one smells like a koji error to me, we may need to contact the koji guys if it presists or ask the mailing list. Does it happen in a local mock build as well? Yeah mock is fine. Opened a ticket with buildsys at: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1315 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494494] Review Request: hyphen-kn - Kannada hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494494 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494494] New: Review Request: hyphen-kn - Kannada hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-kn - Kannada hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494494 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-kn - Kannada hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caol...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-kn.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-kn-0.20081213-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Kannada hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494493] New: Review Request: hyphen-gu - Gujarati hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-gu - Gujarati hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494493 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-gu - Gujarati hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caol...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-gu.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-gu-0.20081213-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Gujarati hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494495] Review Request: hyphen-ml - Malayalam hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494495 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494495] New: Review Request: hyphen-ml - Malayalam hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-ml - Malayalam hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494495 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-ml - Malayalam hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caol...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-ml.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-ml-0.20090118-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Malayalam hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494498] Review Request: hyphen-pa - Punjabi hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494498 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494497] Review Request: hyphen-or - Oriya hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494497 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494497] New: Review Request: hyphen-or - Oriya hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-or - Oriya hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494497 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-or - Oriya hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caol...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-or.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-or-0.20081213-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Oriya hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494498] New: Review Request: hyphen-pa - Punjabi hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-pa - Punjabi hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494498 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-pa - Punjabi hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caol...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-pa.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-pa-0.20081213-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Punjabi hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492122] Review Request: mingw32-cairomm - MinGW Windows C++ API for the cairo graphics library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492122
Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ka...@smartlink.ee
Bug 492122 depends on bug 492110, which changed state.
Bug 492110 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libsigc++20 - MinGW Windows port of
the typesafe signal framework for C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492110
What|Old Value |New Value
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Resolution||NEXTRELEASE
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
--- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee 2009-04-07 04:12:55 EDT
---
Koji scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1281702
Rpmlint is quiet:
$ rpmlint mingw32-cairomm-1.8.0-1.fc11.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint mingw32-cairomm-1.8.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
+ OK
! needs attention
+ rpmlint output
+ Package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines
+ Specfile name matches the package base name
+ Package follows the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines
+ License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
LGPLv2+
+ License matches the actual package license
It is also the same as in the corresponding Fedora cairomm package
+ The package contains the license file (COPYING)
+ Spec file is written in American English
+ Spec file is legible
+ Upstream sources match sources in the srpm
15c0f56eee57bb418c38463a6297d715 cairomm-1.8.0.tar.gz
15c0f56eee57bb418c38463a6297d715 SRPM/cairomm-1.8.0.tar.gz
+ Package builds in mock (Fedora Rawhide i586)
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun
+ Does not use Prefix: /usr
+ Package owns all directories it creates
+ No duplicate files in %files
+ %files has %defattr
+ %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ Consistent use of macros
+ Package must contain code or permissible content
n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ Files marked %doc should not affect package
n/a Header files should be in -devel
Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package
n/a Static libraries should be in -static
+ Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files
Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files
n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ Filenames must be valid UTF-8
Note: I am not in packager group, so I cannot set fedora‑review+ flag.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494499] Review Request: hyphen-ta - Tamil hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494499 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494501] Review Request: hyphen-te - Telugu hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494501 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494499] New: Review Request: hyphen-ta - Tamil hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-ta - Tamil hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494499 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-ta - Tamil hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caol...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-ta.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-ta-0.20081213-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Tamil hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492122] Review Request: mingw32-cairomm - MinGW Windows C++ API for the cairo graphics library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492122 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rjo...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-04-07 04:19:02 EDT --- setting fedora-review+ on the basis of kalev's review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494503] New: Review Request: hyphen-sa - Sanskrit hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-sa - Sanskrit hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494503 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-sa - Sanskrit hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caol...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-sa.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-sa-0.20081010-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Sanskrit hyphenation rules (also usable for Bengali) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494501] New: Review Request: hyphen-te - Telugu hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-te - Telugu hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494501 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-te - Telugu hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caol...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-te.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-te-0.20081213-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Telugu hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494493] Review Request: hyphen-gu - Gujarati hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494493 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 04:21:40 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1281831 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM is hyphen-gu.noarch: W: no-documentation == can be ignored as there is no document files and license is added in hyph_gu_IN.dic + source files match upstream. c0d49e2c424e38cc20351b7c56ad087a hyph_gu_IN.dic + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494495] Review Request: hyphen-ml - Malayalam hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494495 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 04:21:28 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1281829 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM is hyphen-ml.noarch: W: no-documentation == can be ignored as there is no document files and license is added in hyph_ml_IN.dic + source files match upstream. c21f722bb896b9cc23db6e4b42141d0e hyph_ml_IN.dic + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494494] Review Request: hyphen-kn - Kannada hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494494 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 04:21:53 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1281827 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM is hyphen-kn.noarch: W: no-documentation == can be ignored as there is no document files and license is added in hyph_kn_IN.dic + source files match upstream. fe518ce2a504598a5490f4537c0cef5a hyph_kn_IN.dic + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494493] Review Request: hyphen-gu - Gujarati hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494493 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-04-07 04:25:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: hyphen-gu Short Description: Gujarati hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: F-11, devel InitialCC: caolanm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494495] Review Request: hyphen-ml - Malayalam hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494495 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-04-07 04:24:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: hyphen-ml Short Description: Malayalam hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: F-11, devel InitialCC: caolanm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 --- Comment #3 from Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee 2009-04-07 04:29:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mingw32-libp11 Short Description: MingGW Windows libp11 library Owners: kalev rjones Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494494] Review Request: hyphen-kn - Kannada hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494494 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-04-07 04:29:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: hyphen-kn Short Description: Kannada hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: F-11, devel InitialCC: caolanm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494493] Review Request: hyphen-gu - Gujarati hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494493 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492164] Review Request: healpix - Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelization of a sphere
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492164 --- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola jussi.leht...@iki.fi 2009-04-07 04:03:19 EDT --- There's something wrong with the import (and your SRPM!). The SRPM spec sources are still revision 3 instead of 5! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 488173] Package Review: ibus-table-erbi
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488173 Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||RAWHIDE --- Comment #16 from Caius kaio Chance ccha...@redhat.com 2009-04-07 04:03:10 EDT --- built to rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494339] Review Request: hyphen-hi - Hindi hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494339 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-04-07 04:00:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: hyphen-hi Short Description: Hindi hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: F-11, devel InitialCC: caolanm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-04-07 04:37:06 EDT --- I think you first need a sponsor, then get a fedora account, before you can request CVS... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rjo...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494498] Review Request: hyphen-pa - Punjabi hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494498 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 04:35:27 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1281835 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM is hyphen-pa.noarch: W: no-documentation == can be ignored as there is no document files and license is added in hyph_pa_IN.dic + source files match upstream. 9115f6afb94ac8a0daa261958ef1070a hyph_pa_IN.dic + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494501] Review Request: hyphen-te - Telugu hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494501 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 04:34:56 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1281838 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM is hyphen-te.noarch: W: no-documentation == can be ignored as there is no document files and license is added in hyph_te_IN.dic + source files match upstream. 44309696cb5528709decc81344c27248 hyph_te_IN.dic + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494497] Review Request: hyphen-or - Oriya hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494497 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 04:35:19 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1281843 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM is hyphen-or.noarch: W: no-documentation == can be ignored as there is no document files and license is added in hyph_or_IN.dic + source files match upstream. e3ae59d397fe5baf5f9a6bc785ac4b15 hyph_or_IN.dic + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494499] Review Request: hyphen-ta - Tamil hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494499 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 04:35:08 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1281836 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM is hyphen-ta.noarch: W: no-documentation == can be ignored as there is no document files and license is added in hyph_ta_IN.dic + source files match upstream. 0626a05dcb71b96bd2f56ccfb2277cb9 hyph_ta_IN.dic + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494499] Review Request: hyphen-ta - Tamil hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494499 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-04-07 04:40:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: hyphen-ta Short Description: Tamil hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: F-11, devel InitialCC: caolanm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494501] Review Request: hyphen-te - Telugu hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494501 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-04-07 04:40:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: hyphen-te Short Description: Telugu hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: F-11, devel InitialCC: caolanm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494497] Review Request: hyphen-or - Oriya hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494497 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-04-07 04:41:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: hyphen-or Short Description: Oriya hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: F-11, devel InitialCC: caolanm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 --- Comment #5 from Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee 2009-04-07 05:03:42 EDT --- Thanks for your very fast review, Thomas. Richard Jones said he is not familiar with how the sponsorship system works and that he'll try setting fedora‑cvs? flag for me. That's why I requested CVS without being sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #8 from Denis Arnaud denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org 2009-04-07 05:11:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) Consider joining forces with the Debian package maintainer. I've sent an email to Debian QA team for that purpose. However, since that package has been orphaned (http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/soci.html and http://packages.debian.org/source/sid/soci), there is no longer an individual maintainer for it. Once I'll have a pristine SOCI v3.0.0-derived Fedora-compliant package, I'll talk again with the upstream development team, in order to see whether (at least) SONAME can be added. Right now, with the RPM packages I delivered, software using SOCI (for instance, OpenTREP, http://sourceforge.net/projects/opentrep) works almost seamlessly on both installations (either RPM-based or pristine one). So, it should not be a burden for them (SOCI developer team) to accept a few changes so that packages can be cleanly prepared for the major Linux distributions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494503] Review Request: hyphen-sa - Sanskrit hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494503 --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-04-07 05:35:05 EDT --- The package provides hyphen-bn at the moment, so you should be able to do that already, i.e. rpm -qp --provides hyphen-sa-0.20081010-1.fc10.noarch.rpm |grep hyphen-bn hyphen-bn = 0.20081010-1.fc10 The (small) catch to making a physical subpackage called hyphen-bn is that it will contain only a link to hyph_sa_IN.dic (and have a Requires: on hyphen-sa) and then rpmlink will complain about dangling links. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492122] Review Request: mingw32-cairomm - MinGW Windows C++ API for the cairo graphics library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492122 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-04-07 05:39:18 EDT --- Thank you, Kalev and Richard, for the quick review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492122] Review Request: mingw32-cairomm - MinGW Windows C++ API for the cairo graphics library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492122 Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-04-07 05:38:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: mingw32-cairomm Short Description: MinGW Windows C++ API for the cairo graphics library Owners: sailer rjones Branches: F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #19 from David Nielsen gnomeu...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 05:37:45 EDT --- Maybe that is the case, it is my impression that using flags one could specifically tell rpmbuild to build things like --with-evolution and so on so you could build the separated plugins. However that would require being able to run the configure script in such a way as to disable the undesired plugins and knowing the gnome-do guys this will not be possible. I doubt we can do this on second thought. Also regarding the excludes, I rewrote the spec you referenced for greater flexibility and I don't remember doing that.. maybe I did and forgot about it. I'll chuck this up to rpm being suboptimal for maintainers here and not doing the right thing by default. Doesn't this contain language files? Regardless I can do a proper review on Thursday, I had my account reenabled so I should also be able to approve it. A quick overview looks very good though. Why is the banshee exclude commented out? Aside that there's a cosmetic enhancement ensuring an equal amount of newlines between the the main package and the plugins packages file listings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-07 05:45:32 EDT --- globus-common-10.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-common-10.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014
--- Comment #20 from Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal sindr...@fedoraproject.org
2009-04-07 05:43:35 EDT ---
You don't need the excludes, but you do need to use %dir in the -plugins
package. You see, if you do %{_datadir}/gnome-do/plugins/ in %files that
package will own all subdirectories and files of that dir, but if you use %dir
%{_datadir}/gnome-do/plugins/ it will only own the dir in question, without the
subdirs.
As for the monodevelop issue, monodevelop is not available for ppc* for some
reason, the following works around that:
# ppc* not supported: needs monodevelop which is not built for ppc*
ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64 ia64 armv4l sparc alpha
in the long run monodevelop should be fixed to run on ppc though, file a bug
against monodevelop.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494518] New: Review Request: dontzap - Allows users to set the DontZap option in xorg.conf
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dontzap - Allows users to set the DontZap option in xorg.conf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494518 Summary: Review Request: dontzap - Allows users to set the DontZap option in xorg.conf Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sunda...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/dontzap.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/dontzap-0.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: DontZap is an application written in Python which relies on X-Kit and allows users to set the DontZap option in xorg.conf. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494517] New: Review Request: x-kit - A simple, transparent and easy to extend xorg parser
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: x-kit - A simple, transparent and easy to extend xorg parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494517 Summary: Review Request: x-kit - A simple, transparent and easy to extend xorg parser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sunda...@redhat.com QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/x-kit.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/x-kit-0.4.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A simple, transparent and easy to extend xorg parser -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 453851] Review Request: globus-common - Globus Toolkit - Common Library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453851 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-07 05:45:39 EDT --- globus-common-10.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-common-10.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491694] Review Request: Anyterm - Web based terminal emulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491694 --- Comment #12 from Alexander Boström a...@kth.se 2009-04-07 05:33:46 EDT --- Looks pretty good! My comments: * The typical use case for this is a multiuser machine where you'd usually not completely trust all users. Since Apache is configured to proxy to port 8080 then if anytermd is not running for some reason any user will be able to listen to that port and have other users' passwords sent there. So I still think using a port 1024 by default is the way to go. * In anyterm-cmd: read U ssh $...@localhost Here the user could enter any ssh client option into $U, and I'm pretty sure it's possible to do evil that way, for example by causing ~anytermd/.ssh/config and ~anytermd/.ssh/known_hosts to be replaced. I suggest something like this: while :; do echo -n Username: read U # Make sure it does not start with a - and only contains valid # username characters. if [[ $U =~ ^[A-Za-z0-9_] ! ( $U =~ [^A-Za-z0-9_-] ) ]]; then exec ssh $...@localhost fi echo Bad username. done * I'd package the static content in /var/www/anyterm to make it easy for admins to customize it and cut down on proxy traffic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Sailer t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch 2009-04-07 05:22:05 EDT --- Please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Before you are sponsored, you do not have a fedora account (kalev does not exist), and therefore you cannot be owner of a package in CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481159] Review Request: ocaml-autoconf - Autoconf macros for OCaml
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481159 Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com 2009-04-07 06:42:37 EDT --- Somehow this bug got overlooked, sorry about that ... New Package CVS Request === Package Name: ocaml-autoconf Short Description: Autoconf macros for OCaml Owners: rjones Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491027] Review Request: fb-contrib - Extra findbugs detectors
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491027 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com 2009-04-07 06:48:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) H... I'm not sure how to handle this. The name of the upstream project is fb-contrib. The findbugs developers often tell people to go to that project for extra detectors. So those who have seen a reference to it on the findbugs web site will look for the name fb-contrib in Fedora. On the other hand, naming it findbugs-contrib would list it with the other findbugs packages, so those browsing the package names would be more likely to find it there. I'm really not sure what to do. It would be nice if the upstream name were findbugs-contrib. I'd also like a pony. :-) How about naming the package findbugs-contrib, but having it Provide: fb-contrib? Would yum find it then if someone did yum install fb-contrib? Yeah, it will install it. But I would say just name it findbugs-contrib. I don't think that the additional provide is needed, but it's up to you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #15 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 07:34:24 EDT --- Koji scratchbuild: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1282233 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494503] Review Request: hyphen-sa - Sanskrit hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494503 Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Caolan McNamara caol...@redhat.com 2009-04-07 07:54:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: hyphen-sa Short Description: Sanskrit hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: F-11, devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 srinivas srinivas_ramana...@dell.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||needinfo?(matt_dom...@dell. ||com) --- Comment #15 from srinivas srinivas_ramana...@dell.com 2009-04-07 08:07:20 EDT --- Review: Fix all rpmlint warnings: [r...@localhost ~]# rpmlint gpxe-* gpxe.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 12, tab: line 10) gpxe-bootimgs.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized gPXE - bootable USB, CD, floppy images and GRUB format gpxe-roms.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized gPXE - boot roms in .rom format gpxe-roms-qemu.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized gPXE - boot roms supported by QEMU, .rom format naming: ok spec file name matches: ok license = GPLv2 and BSD: ok license tag: ok spec in english: ok spec legible: ok no prebuild binaries: ok no packager, vendor, copyright, tags: ok summary and description tags: ok no rpaths: ok no config files: ok no initscripts: ok no desktop files: ok consistent use of macros: ok no makeinstall: ok no lang files: ok scriptlets: ok no conditional deps: ok builds with a normal user account: ok not relocatable: ok code, not content: ok directory ownership: ok users and groups: ok not a web app: ok conflicts: ok no kmods: ok no files under /srv: ok source matches: ok calls ldconfig appropriately: ok no duplicate files: ok file permissions: ok libtool archives removed: ok %clean section: ok no large docs, no need for -doc subpackage: ok %doc usage ok no static libs: ok no pkgconfig files: ok all libtool .la files removed: ok dir ownership correct: ok %install does rm: ok filenames UTF8: ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494503] Review Request: hyphen-sa - Sanskrit hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494503 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 05:00:06 EDT --- I think if hyphen-bn subpackage added to hyphen-sa then we can list that in comps under bengali-support language group -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492164] Review Request: healpix - Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelization of a sphere
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492164 --- Comment #18 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-04-07 04:40:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) There's something wrong with the import (and your SRPM!). The SRPM spec sources are still revision 3 instead of 5! Uff. I suck. I'll fix that and respin the update you've created. Sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 493232] Review Request: redir - Redirect TCP connections
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493232 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-04-07 06:47:26 EDT --- redir-2.2.1-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/redir-2.2.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 492164] Review Request: healpix - Hierarchical Equal Area isoLatitude Pixelization of a sphere
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492164 --- Comment #19 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-04-07 04:47:00 EDT --- That was probably since [1] pointed at the old package. I copied it from -3 and intended to rsync -5 there, but probably the rsync was not successful. [1] http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/healpix-2.11c-5.el5.src.rpm Anyways, the correct version in builds now. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494520] Review Request: cdf - The NASA Common Data Format implementation
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494520 Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lkund...@v3.sk AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lkund...@v3.sk Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494546] New: Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494546 Summary: Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@redhat.com ReportedBy: rpach...@redhat.com CC: nott...@redhat.com, mchri...@redhat.com, pm-r...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Clone Of: 489929 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #489929 +++ Spec URL: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi.spec SRPM URL: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libHBAAPI-2.2-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Package contains HBA API library, used as a wrapper for other vendor specific libraries. Package will be used as a connector between FCoE Utilities and libhalinux. --- Additional comment from d...@danny.cz on 2009-03-30 10:13:18 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: BAD source files match upstream: BAD package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK* rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK headers in -devel OK pkgconfig files in -devel OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - full URLs for Sources are missing - the %name tag should be all in lowercase to be consistent with archive name (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines) - it's preferred to have the Requires for the devel sub-package on separate lines - rpmlint complains a bit: libHBAAPI-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license SNIA libHBAAPI-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license SNIA libHBAAPI.src: W: invalid-license SNIA libHBAAPI.x86_64: W: invalid-license SNIA = SNIA license was recently added to the list of good licenses and is not yet known to rpmlint libHBAAPI.src: E: invalid-spec-name = package name and spec filename are not in sync libHBAAPI-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation = can be ignored - you can apply the includes patch supplied by the hbaapi_build archive instead of using an own copy --- Additional comment from jzel...@redhat.com on 2009-03-31 05:42:35 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi.spec Updated SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi-2.2-3.fc10.src.rpm --- Additional comment from d...@danny.cz on 2009-03-31 06:34:22 EDT --- - the hbaapi_build_2.2.tar.gz tarball differs between this package and upstream URL (length 674018 vs. 672470) - the %description for the main package could be more verbose --- Additional comment from d...@danny.cz on 2009-03-31 06:37:04 EDT --- link to the thread about the SNIA license on fedora-legal mailing list - https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-February/msg00033.html --- Additional comment from jzel...@redhat.com on 2009-04-01 09:09:11 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi.spec Updated SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi-2.2-4.fc10.src.rpm I added one line to the description. It's not much, but hopefully it's enough for now. --- Additional comment from d...@danny.cz on 2009-04-01 10:15:39 EDT --- All issues are fixed, this package is APPROVED. --- Additional comment from jzel...@redhat.com on 2009-04-02 03:40:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: libhbaapi Short Description: Package contains HBA API library. It will be used as a connector between FCoE Utilities and libhbalinux. Owners: jzeleny Branches: InitialCC: --- Additional comment from ke...@tummy.com on 2009-04-03 16:41:57 EDT --- I used SNIA HBAAPI library as the Short Description as that seems more correct. cvs done. -- Configure
[Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 --- Comment #7 from Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee 2009-04-07 07:28:27 EDT --- I am familiar with the HowToGetSponsored page and I do have an FAS account for a while now. Please see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/kalev So far I have posted 3 packages for review (and they all block FE-NEEDSPONSOR). Besides the mingw32-libp11 I have: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=mingw32-opensc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=powwow I have also done a few unofficial reviews and commented in some bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491617 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492165 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492122 In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=mingw32-cairomm I did the official review. Richard Jones checked on my review and set the fedora‑review+ flag for me. Regarding this package here, I discussed the situation with Richard Jones and he suggested that he could try setting the fedora‑cvs? flag as I still don't have a sponsor, that's the reason I posted the CVS request too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 458952] Review Request: SEMS - an extensible SIP media server
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458952 --- Comment #14 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 07:33:51 EDT --- Ver. 1.1.0-2 http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sems.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/sems-1.1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm * OpenSER specific code is disabled (It's no longer necessary since OpenSER can control SEMS via SIP-headers). * Fixed installation of DSM-plugin The issue with python still not resolved. I'll try to fix ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494546] Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494546 Ronald Pacheco rpach...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||188271(RHEL5.0-NEW) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 470703] Review Request: links 2 - text mode browser with graphics
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #27 from Ondrej Vasik ova...@redhat.com 2009-04-07 08:32:34 EDT --- Sorry for few days delay... + package builds in mock (development i386). + rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM links.src:37: W: unversioned-explicit-provides webclient links.src:38: W: unversioned-explicit-provides text-www-browser - common for those provides in existing packages - could be ignored links.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 37) - should be fixed + rpmlint is NOT silent for RPM. links.i586: W: non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/links 0644 - I guess this is just rpmlint noise, as /usr/bin/links is only via alternatives and should be ignored links.i586: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/links.desktop - links.desktop: error: required key Encoding not found + source files match upstream. bf5b20529a2a811701c5af52b28ebdd4 links-2.2.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. - License text is NOT included in package. - COPYING file should be shipped + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc files. + no .la files. + menu translations are available in binary + Does own the directories it creates (none special created) + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate (ignoring false-positive rpmlint warning about ghosted touched file/future alternative symlink). + GUI app with desktop file (expecting addition of Encoding line) and icon Required to fix: - Add Encoding=UTF-8 line to desktop file - Do ship COPYING in %doc - fix mixed tab/spaces and previously mentioned things in spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494549] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494549 Ronald Pacheco rpach...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||494550 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494546] Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494546 RHEL Product and Program Management pm-r...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||pm_ack? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494546] Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494546 Ronald Pacheco rpach...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||494548 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 489962] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489962 Ronald Pacheco rpach...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||494549 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494546] Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494546 --- Comment #1 from RHEL Product and Program Management pm-r...@redhat.com 2009-04-07 08:36:44 EDT --- This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. If you would like this request to be reviewed for the next minor release, ask your support representative to set the next rhel-x.y flag to ?. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494549] New: Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494549 Summary: Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@redhat.com ReportedBy: rpach...@redhat.com CC: nott...@redhat.com, mchri...@redhat.com, pm-r...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Depends on: 489962 Blocks: 188271 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Clone Of: 489962 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #489962 +++ SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhalinux/libhbalinux-1.0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhalinux/libhbalinux.spec This is HBAAPI vendor library to manage Fibre Channel Host Bus Adapters. Review request for libHBAAPI: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489929 --- Additional comment from jzel...@redhat.com on 2009-04-03 09:23:38 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbalinux/libhbalinux.spec Updated SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbalinux/libhbalinux-1.0.7-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494550] New: Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494550 Summary: Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: distribution AssignedTo: pm-r...@redhat.com ReportedBy: rpach...@redhat.com QAContact: release-test-t...@redhat.com CC: nott...@redhat.com, mchri...@redhat.com, pm-r...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Depends on: 494549 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Clone Of: 494549 Ronald Pacheco rpach...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||pm_ack?, devel_ack?, ||qa_ack? +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #494549 +++ +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #489962 +++ SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhalinux/libhbalinux-1.0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhalinux/libhbalinux.spec This is HBAAPI vendor library to manage Fibre Channel Host Bus Adapters. Review request for libHBAAPI: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489929 --- Additional comment from jzel...@redhat.com on 2009-04-03 09:23:38 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbalinux/libhbalinux.spec Updated SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbalinux/libhbalinux-1.0.7-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494548] New: Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494548 Summary: Review request: libhbaapi - SNIA HBAAPI library Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: distribution AssignedTo: pm-r...@redhat.com ReportedBy: rpach...@redhat.com QAContact: release-test-t...@redhat.com CC: nott...@redhat.com, mchri...@redhat.com, pm-r...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Depends on: 494546 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Clone Of: 494546 Ronald Pacheco rpach...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||pm_ack?, devel_ack?, ||qa_ack? +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #494546 +++ +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #489929 +++ Spec URL: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi.spec SRPM URL: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libHBAAPI-2.2-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Package contains HBA API library, used as a wrapper for other vendor specific libraries. Package will be used as a connector between FCoE Utilities and libhalinux. --- Additional comment from d...@danny.cz on 2009-03-30 10:13:18 EDT --- formal review is here, see the notes below: BAD source files match upstream: BAD package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK* rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK headers in -devel OK pkgconfig files in -devel OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - full URLs for Sources are missing - the %name tag should be all in lowercase to be consistent with archive name (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines) - it's preferred to have the Requires for the devel sub-package on separate lines - rpmlint complains a bit: libHBAAPI-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license SNIA libHBAAPI-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license SNIA libHBAAPI.src: W: invalid-license SNIA libHBAAPI.x86_64: W: invalid-license SNIA = SNIA license was recently added to the list of good licenses and is not yet known to rpmlint libHBAAPI.src: E: invalid-spec-name = package name and spec filename are not in sync libHBAAPI-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation = can be ignored - you can apply the includes patch supplied by the hbaapi_build archive instead of using an own copy --- Additional comment from jzel...@redhat.com on 2009-03-31 05:42:35 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi.spec Updated SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi-2.2-3.fc10.src.rpm --- Additional comment from d...@danny.cz on 2009-03-31 06:34:22 EDT --- - the hbaapi_build_2.2.tar.gz tarball differs between this package and upstream URL (length 674018 vs. 672470) - the %description for the main package could be more verbose --- Additional comment from d...@danny.cz on 2009-03-31 06:37:04 EDT --- link to the thread about the SNIA license on fedora-legal mailing list - https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-February/msg00033.html --- Additional comment from jzel...@redhat.com on 2009-04-01 09:09:11 EDT --- Updated SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi.spec Updated SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/libhbaapi/libhbaapi-2.2-4.fc10.src.rpm I added one line to the description. It's not much, but hopefully it's enough for now. --- Additional comment from d...@danny.cz on 2009-04-01 10:15:39 EDT --- All issues are fixed, this package is APPROVED. --- Additional comment from jzel...@redhat.com on
[Bug 493958] Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493958 Ronald Pacheco rpach...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||494553 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494553] Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494553 Ronald Pacheco rpach...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||494555 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494553] New: Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494553 Summary: Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@redhat.com ReportedBy: rpach...@redhat.com CC: nott...@redhat.com, mchri...@redhat.com, pm-r...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Depends on: 493958 Blocks: 188271 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Clone Of: 493958 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #493958 +++ SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/fcoe-utils/fcoe-utils-1.0.7-2.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/fcoe-utils/fcoe-utils.spec Fibre Channel over Ethernet utilities: fcoeadm - command line tool for configuring FCoE interfaces fcoemon - service to configure DCB Ethernet QOS filters, works with dcbd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494555] New: Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494555 Summary: Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Version: 5.4 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: distribution AssignedTo: pm-r...@redhat.com ReportedBy: rpach...@redhat.com QAContact: release-test-t...@redhat.com CC: nott...@redhat.com, mchri...@redhat.com, pm-r...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Depends on: 494553 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Red Hat Target Release: --- Clone Of: 494553 Ronald Pacheco rpach...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||pm_ack?, devel_ack?, ||qa_ack? +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #494553 +++ +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #493958 +++ SRPM: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/fcoe-utils/fcoe-utils-1.0.7-2.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://jzeleny.fedorapeople.org/packages/fcoe-utils/fcoe-utils.spec Fibre Channel over Ethernet utilities: fcoeadm - command line tool for configuring FCoE interfaces fcoemon - service to configure DCB Ethernet QOS filters, works with dcbd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494553] Review request: fcoe-utils - utilities for fibre channel over ethernet
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494553 RHEL Product and Program Management pm-r...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||pm_ack? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 491805] Review Request: django-sct - A collection of Django applications for building community websites
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491805 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazquez...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazquez...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 05:32:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: django-sct Short Description: A collection of Django applications for building community websites Owners: ivazquez Branches: F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494503] Review Request: hyphen-sa - Sanskrit hyphenation rules
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494503 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com 2009-04-07 07:06:05 EDT --- Thanks for the above info. Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1281841 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM is silent. + source files match upstream. b34adf4185eb8f46773627c240b24806 hyph-sa.tex + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494549] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494549 RHEL Product and Program Management pm-r...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||pm_ack? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 494549] Review request: libhbalinux - SNIA HBAAPI vendor library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494549 --- Comment #1 from RHEL Product and Program Management pm-r...@redhat.com 2009-04-07 08:46:53 EDT --- This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion, but this component is not scheduled to be updated in the current Red Hat Enterprise Linux release. If you would like this request to be reviewed for the next minor release, ask your support representative to set the next rhel-x.y flag to ?. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
