[Bug 533803] Review Request: libcue - CUE sheet parser library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533803
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||mschwe...@gmail.com
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mschwe...@gmail.com
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com 2009-11-14 04:19:05
EDT ---
* Group tag of base package should be: System Environment/Libraries
* Source URL points at a web page instead of the source tarball. Use this (it
follows the guidelines, too):
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libcue/libcue-%{version}.tar.bz2
%description
Libcue is intended to parse a so called [...]
Correct English IMO would be: Libcue is intended for parsing a so-called [...]
W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libcue.so.1.0.3 e...@glibc_2.0
Not good, since this is a library. Libraries ought to return error values
instead of terminating the process. This exit call is in a fatal error function
inside the generated flex scanner code.
* Two source files rem.c and rem.h contain a BSD license header and the name of
the current developer. According to Fedora's Licensing Guidelines, this must be
reflected in the License tag plus a comment in the spec file:
# Files libcue/rem.{c,h} contain a BSD header
License: GPLv2 and BSD
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios
The project's file COPYING comments on the two licences and explicitly
acknowledges that the whole libcue project uses the GPLv2. Preferably, the
current developer removes the ambiguity and explicitly applies the GPLv2 inside
the rem.c/rem.h files, too.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 520569] Review Request: uboot-mkimage - U-Boot mkimage utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520569 --- Comment #6 from Dan Horák d...@danny.cz 2009-11-14 05:09:26 EDT --- New release is available, now based on the official U-Boot sources. It includes both mkimage and the environment r/w tool. This is really a work-in-progress and the final look of the package should be discussed between the interested parties. Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/uboot-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/uboot-tools-2009.08-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 531255] Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-14 05:50:19 EDT --- CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 531255] Review Request: CGSI-gSOAP - GSI plugin for gSOAP
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531255 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-14 05:50:25 EDT --- CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/CGSI-gSOAP-1.3.3.2-2.20090920cvs.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com 2009-11-14 06:13:18 EDT --- Ping, Dave. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter...@redhat.com Flag||fedora-review? --- Comment #27 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-11-14 07:12:35 EDT --- Thanks for the update and continued effort on this package. I think we are getting nearly there. :) (In reply to comment #22) The intention was GPLv2. The license block in the Cabal says GPL, but the License file it points at is the GPLv2. Likely Neil (the author) is not familiar with the Fedora's distinction of GPLv2 vs GPLv2+, but I will try and find what the Haskell/Cabal approved way is to mark GPL versions in the license field. AFAIK there isn't one :-( so we should probably complain to cabal/hackage about it, and request adding of GPLvN but getting it fine-grained enough for Fedora will probably be hard I suspect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #24 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-11-14 06:49:26 EDT --- I think it is better just to move haskell-mode-init.patch into Source1: haskell-mode-init.el - doing it as a patch doesn't really make sense. Have you submitted the Makefile patch upstream - it looks pretty sane and non-fedora specific to me. Otherwise I think the package looks pretty reasonable to me. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Emacs#Template_for_a_add-on_package_for_GNU_Emacs_only -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 530688] Review Request: ghc-language-c - Haskell language-c library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530688 Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|b...@serpentine.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #28 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-11-14 07:36:42 EDT --- I see 1.6.12 is out: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/hlint Also I tried a scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1806154 which failed since you should BR ghc-cpphs-devel not cpphs. (Would be nice to update the deps for f11, so that it will build there too.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #29 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-11-14 07:43:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) I see 1.6.12 is out: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/hlint Though it seems to require haskell-src-exts =1.3. which failed since you should BR ghc-cpphs-devel not cpphs. However even after it still fails for me mysteriously: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1806161 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 537563] New: Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of portable game related libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of portable game
related libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537563
Summary: Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of
portable game related libraries
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: fgfs.ste...@gmail.com
QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://riemens.org/fs/mingw32-plib.spec
SRPM URL: http://riemens.org/fs/mingw32-plib-1.8.5-0.fc12.src.rpm
Description:
This is a set of OpenSource (LGPL) libraries that will permit programmers
to write games and other realtime interactive applications that are 100%
portable across a wide range of hardware and operating systems. Here is
what you need - it's all free and available with LGPL'ed source code on
the web. All of it works well together.
This is the fedora mingw cross-compiled version
rpmlint output:
mingw32-plib.src: W: macro-in-%description %{_mingw32_description}
I believe this one can be safely ignored
mingw32-plib-debuginfo.noarch: E: empty-debuginfo-package
I'm not sure what to think of this one...
mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibsm.a
mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibpsl.a
mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibul.a
mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibssg.a
mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibnet.a
mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibsl.a
mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibjs.a
mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibpw.a
mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibpuaux.a
mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibsg.a
mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibfnt.a
mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibpu.a
mingw32-plib-static.noarch: E:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libplibssgaux.a
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 14 errors, 1 warnings.
These can all be ignored, as they are normal for static mingw packages
Mingw packaging guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW
Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1806163
PS, I'm still in need of a sponsor...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 537563] Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of portable game related libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537563 --- Comment #1 from Stefan Riemens fgfs.ste...@gmail.com 2009-11-14 07:59:07 EDT --- I forgot to mention that these binaries work fine with a x-compiled flightgear Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 537563] Review Request: mingw32-plib - Fedora mingw set of portable game related libraries
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537563 Stefan Riemens fgfs.ste...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora-mi...@lists.fedorapr ||oject.org Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 533302] Review Request: rst2pdf - Tool for transforming reStructuredText to PDF
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533302 Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com 2009-11-14 08:03:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: rst2pdf Short Description: Tool for transforming reStructuredText to PDF Owners: sergiopr Branches: F-12 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-14 08:20:11 EDT --- metadata-extractor-2.3.1-5.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/metadata-extractor-2.3.1-5.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-14 08:21:18 EDT --- metadata-extractor-2.3.1-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/metadata-extractor-2.3.1-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-14 08:22:30 EDT --- metadata-extractor-2.3.1-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/metadata-extractor-2.3.1-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 516343] Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #32 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2009-11-14 08:23:57 EDT --- Built. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 Bug 508351 depends on bug 516343, which changed state. Bug 516343 Summary: Review Request: metadata-extractor - JPEG metadata extraction framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516343 What|Old Value |New Value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527241] Review Request: libvtemm - C++ bindings for vte
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527241 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-14 08:24:48 EDT --- libvtemm-0.22.1-4.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libvtemm-0.22.1-4.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351
--- Comment #17 from Andrea Musuruane musur...@gmail.com 2009-11-14 08:32:26
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #16)
I have updated to last josm tested revision and change $RPM_BUILD_ROOT by
%{buildroot} in SPEC file.
http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/josm.spec
http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/josm-snapshot-2255svn.1.fc11.src.rpm
You cannot use snapshot as a Version and Release is wrong. Please read again
the following guideline:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513775] Review Request: pyfuzzy - Python framework for fuzzy sets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513775 --- Comment #8 from René Liebscher r.liebsc...@gmx.de 2009-11-14 08:46:43 EDT --- Hi, I am always working on new releases, but you might have missed the last one from 2009-10-18, see https://sourceforge.net/projects/pyfuzzy/files/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large photo wall
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 Edwin ten Brink fed...@tenbrink-bekkers.nl changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Edwin ten Brink fed...@tenbrink-bekkers.nl 2009-11-14 09:11:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request === Package Name: picturetile Short Description: Tiles a bunch of images into one large photo wall Owners: edwintb Branches: F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #30 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com 2009-11-14 09:49:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #29) I see 1.6.12 is out: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/hlint Though it seems to require haskell-src-exts =1.3. Ok I went ahead and built ghc-haskell-src-exts-1.3.0 in dist-f13. However even after it still fails for me mysteriously: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1806161 Fixed in same build adding missing Requires: ghc-cpphs-devel. So hopefully hlint-1.6.12 should build there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479763] Review Request: seam - The Simple Extensible Abstract Machine
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479763 Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution||WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-11-14 09:54:04 EDT --- Upstream doesn't seam to be active any more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-11-14 10:50:51 EDT --- This builds but does not seem to install due to a missing dependency on perl(Test::Dynamic). It's odd that anything in Test would be required at runtime; can you explain why the three dependencies under #testsuite would need to be runtime dependencies instead of build-time dependencies, or why Test::Dynamic is required for anything? It doesn't seem to appear in the source at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527706] Review Request: mingw32-libgeotiff - MinGW port of libgeotiff Georeferenced image library
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527706 --- Comment #12 from Dave Ludlow d...@adsllc.com 2009-11-14 11:03:29 EDT --- Sorry, was out of town. Will get to this shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #28 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-11-14 11:04:53 EDT --- So would you change the release number? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532874] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-wacom - Xorg X11 wacom input driver
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532874 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-14 11:26:46 EDT --- Peter, I have the hp touchsmart tx2 and on some webpages, there is mentioned, that this is a wacom tablet pc, so it should be working with this driver... But I can't get it working with F-12. Is there anything I can help with testing? Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but shouldn't the display be autodetected anyway, when this driver is installed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 524379] Review Request: gscribble - A desktop blogging client for GNOME
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=524379 --- Comment #29 from Roshan Singh singh.rosha...@gmail.com 2009-11-14 11:38:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) So would you change the release number? As of now, let it be like this, if I need to make any further changes to the spec file, I will definitely change the release number. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 513775] Review Request: pyfuzzy - Python framework for fuzzy sets
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513775 --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter fab...@bernewireless.net 2009-11-14 11:44:13 EDT --- Hmmm, I missed that. I will provide a new package soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 533302] Review Request: rst2pdf - Tool for transforming reStructuredText to PDF
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533302 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-11-14 11:40:24 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large photo wall
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-11-14 11:42:22 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 536737] Review Request: yum-langpacks - langpacks plugin for yum
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=536737 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu 2009-11-14 12:17:09 EDT --- Is this related to bug 512663 in any way? Does one depend on the other? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 530301] Review Request: bmpanel2 - NETWM compliant panel for X
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530301
--- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-11-14
12:23:42 EDT ---
Well, still I cannot launch bmpanel2 on GNOME, it launches
on XFCE, so I will continue this review request.
For -0.4:
* Source
- For source, please write the URL of the original source as a
comment, and rename the stripped tarball to like
%{name}-%{upstream_version}-stripped.tar.gz or so.
* icon cache updating
- Please follow
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache
( You are using the old template )
- As you are using %{_datadir}/icons/gnome/ (not %_datadir/icons/hicolor),
the scriptlet should also be using this directory.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 533558] Review Request: gtkwhiteboard - GTK Wiimote Whiteboard
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533558 Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||richmat...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Rich Mattes richmat...@gmail.com 2009-11-14 12:26:39 EDT --- informal review: * You're supposed to put up the rpmlint output: $ rpmlint gtkwhiteboard.spec ../RPMS/noarch/gtkwhiteboard-1.3-2.fc11.noarch.rpm gtkwhiteboard.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib gtkwhiteboard.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/gtkwhiteboard-1.3/linuxWiimoteLib.py 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. There's a couple errors there that you can fix. To find out more, do rpmlint -I error (i.e. rpmlint -I explicit-lib-dependency) * There's no LICENSE file provided in the %doc section -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 537585] New: Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537585 Summary: Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: m...@v3.sk QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/intellij-idea/picocontainer.spec SRPM URL: http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/intellij-idea/picocontainer-1.3-5.fc11.src.rpm Description: Lightweight and highly embeddable inversion of controll container for components that honour dependency injection. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508518] Review Request: Meiga - Easy tool for file sharing and content publishing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508518 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-14 13:17:41 EDT --- Review: - Sources match upstream - $ rpmlint meiga.spec meiga-0.3.1-1.fc12.src.rpm x86_64/meiga-0.3.1-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm x86_64/meiga-debuginfo-0.3.1-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. - file permissions ok - %files section ok - properly install locales - license GPLv2+ ok - package works as expected Issues: - Gnome users are currently forced to install kde-filesystem. If you split the .desktop files for kde into a subpackage, this would help a lot. But this is no requirement. - When installing there is a gtk-update-icon-cache: No theme index file. Don't not how to eliminate this, but not a blocker atm. - When building, there is a intltoolize: 'po/Makefile.in.in' exists: use '--force' to overwrite So please add --force to intltoolize This are only minor issues, so this package is: ___ APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 537585] Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537585 --- Comment #1 from Michal Ingeli m...@v3.sk 2009-11-14 13:17:22 EDT --- Builds in mock and koji [1], rpmlint quiet. [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1806166 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 512608] Review Request: mozilla-noscript - Javascript whitelist extension for Mozilla Firefox
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512608 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-14 13:20:12 EDT --- Ping, Andreas, any update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 520637] Review Request: mdk - GNU MIX Development Kit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520637 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-11-14 13:27:43 EDT --- Well, for unknown reason, currently I can run gmixvm on F-12 i686 system without any problem. Now I will restart this review ticket. Then for 1.2.5-1: * BR - Add BuildRequires: intltool. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1806518 Otherwise okay. By the way, as this is needsponsor ticket, I want to wait for the approval of this ticket until you update bug 528108. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532306] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-debug - Faster implementation of the standard Debugging
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532306 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-11-14 13:29:54 EDT --- (Just putting a note that I postpone reviewing this review request until bug 533725 is completed) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Resolution||NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(meta...@gmail.com | |) | --- Comment #33 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-11-14 13:31:41 EDT --- Once closing. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please open a new review request and mark this package as a duplicate of the new one. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 537587] New: Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 Summary: Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nob...@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nathan...@gnat.ca QAContact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: nott...@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.gnat.ca/dspam.spec SRPM URL: http://www.gnat.ca/dspam-3.9.0-BETA4.src.rpm Description: The DSPAM agent masquerades as the email server's local delivery agent and filters/learns spams using an advanced Bayesian statistical approach (based on Baye's theorem of combined probabilities) which provides an administratively maintenance-free, easy-learning Anti-Spam service custom tailored to each individual user's behavior. Advanced because on top of standard Bayesian filtering is also incorporated the use of Chained Tokens, de-obfuscation, and other enhancements. DSPAM works great with Sendmail and Exim, and should work well with any other MTA that supports an external local delivery agent (postfix, qmail, etc.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 533302] Review Request: rst2pdf - Tool for transforming reStructuredText to PDF
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533302 Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 531391] Review Request: gwsmhg - hg/mq GUI
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=531391 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(m...@kiilerich.co ||m) --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-11-14 13:36:39 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(kana...@kanarip.c ||om) --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-11-14 13:35:46 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509936] Review Request: tortoisehg - Mercurial gui tools and nautilus plugin
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509936 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(m...@kiilerich.co ||m) --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-11-14 13:37:37 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 506100] Review Request: opennhrp - An NHRP implementation for Linux
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506100 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||needinfo?(tja...@gmail.com) --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-11-14 13:37:06 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-11-14 13:54:15 EDT --- ( From the message of the submitter on fedora-devel-list blocking needsponsor ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 527549] Review Request: osm2go - A simple openstreetmap editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527549 Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status Whiteboard||NEEDSWORK --- Comment #5 from Martin Gieseking martin.giesek...@uos.de 2009-11-14 13:55:57 EDT --- Ok, fine. I think it's better to wait for an upstream release that also works with the upcoming F-12 and the devel branch rather than approving the current package for F-11 only. Please clear the whiteboard when a new release/revision is ready to be reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 537587] Review Request: dspam - bayesian filtering daemon, client, library and web ui
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537587 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lvill...@binaryhelix.net --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-11-14 13:56:58 EDT --- *** Bug 435121 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 435121] Review Request: dspam - Scalable and open-source content-based spam filter
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435121 Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #33 from Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2009-11-14 13:56:57 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 537587 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #31 from Conrad Meyer kon...@tylerc.org 2009-11-14 14:05:53 EDT --- Ok, I've made these changes, but I can't build it locally due to not being able to find haskell-src-exts-devel = 1.3. I've got to run, but here is the new spec/srpm: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/hlint.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/hlint-1.6.12-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 503336] Review Request: newsbeuter - console based feed reader
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503336 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-14 14:19:26 EDT --- newsbeuter-2.0-8.fc12 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 12. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/newsbeuter-2.0-8.fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 478806] Review Request: simh - A highly portable, multi-system emulator
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478806 --- Comment #14 from Lucian Langa co...@gnome.eu.org 2009-11-14 14:36:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) I did try to test these, but honestly I've no idea what I'm doing so I can't really do that. I did run simh-altair and entered go; it segfaulted immediately. Looks like a valid bug there, I will address it upstream. I've updated the files with regard to above comments. http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/simh.spec http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/simh-3.8.1-3.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 532309] Review Request: rubygem-net-ldap - A full-featured pure-Ruby LDAP client
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532309 Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|needinfo?(kana...@kanarip.c | |om) | --- Comment #3 from Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com 2009-11-14 14:55:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) - The srpm name must be rubygem-ruby-net-ldap, not rubygem-net-ldap ( even if the name seems rather redundant ), because * the installed gem name is actually ruby-net-ldap, not net-ldap ( actually gem list -b foo or ruby -e require 'rubygems' ; gem 'foo' shows it ). Removing ruby- part from srpm is more confusing. Fixed. - Please use the defined macro and remove unused macro definition. Fixed. - Usually gems' source URL are: http://gems.rubyforge.org/gems/gemname-version.gem Fixed. - Mark document files as %doc properly - Please enable test program. These tests will mostly fail because; 1) there isn't any adequate testing 2) tests do not have an LDAP server to connect to I enabled them anyway and made sure they would hold back the rpm build New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-ruby-net-ldap.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-ruby-net-ldap-0.0.4-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 534061] Review Request: hostname - Utility to set/show the host name or domain name
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=534061 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pa...@hubbitus.info --- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) pa...@hubbitus.info 2009-11-14 15:18:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) Those two rpmlint warnings are completely bogus; I'll report a bug against rpmlint. If you read explanation of rpmlint you undarstand what all correct: hostname.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install You should clean $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in the %clean section and in the beginning of the %install section. Use rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. Some rpm configurations do this automatically; if your package is only going to be built in such configurations, you can ignore this warning for the section(s) where your rpm takes care of it. hostname.src: W: no-buildroot-tag The BuildRoot tag isn't used in your spec. It must be used in order to allow building the package as non root on some systems. For some rpm versions (e.g. rpm.org = 4.6) the BuildRoot tag is not necessary in specfiles and is ignored by rpmbuild; if your package is only going to be built with such rpm versions you can ignore this warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509965] Review Request: snmptt - SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509965 --- Comment #10 from Gary T. Giesen gie...@snickers.org 2009-11-14 16:37:20 EDT --- Updated URLs: http://giesen.fedorapeople.org/snmptt/snmptt.spec http://giesen.fedorapeople.org/snmptt/snmptt-1.3-0.1.beta2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509965] Review Request: snmptt - SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509965 --- Comment #11 from Gary T. Giesen gie...@snickers.org 2009-11-14 16:39:05 EDT --- Still waiting for a 1.3 from the author, I'll ping him. In the meantime, the packaging shouldn't change from 1.3b2 to 1.3 release so I think a review is still worthwhile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 --- Comment #10 from Greg Sabino Mullane g...@endpoint.com 2009-11-14 16:42:14 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=369554) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=369554) Cleaned up spec for 4.4.0 Removed some duplicated modules, changed Mail::Sendmail to Net::SMTP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 537585] Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537585
Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lkund...@v3.sk
AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lkund...@v3.sk
Flag||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel lkund...@v3.sk 2009-11-14 16:39:41 EDT ---
1.) BuildRoot, please fix it up according to guidelines.
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root
2.) No useless comments please
#setup -q -c -n %{name}-%{version}
3.) Please don't do the jpackage javadoc magic:
ln -s %{name}-%{version} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadocdir}/%{name}
%ghost %doc %{_javadocdir}/%{name}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 509965] Review Request: snmptt - SNMPTT (SNMP Trap Translator) is an SNMP trap handler written in Perl
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509965 --- Comment #9 from Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi 2009-11-14 16:34:06 EDT --- Gary: ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351
--- Comment #18 from Cédric OLIVIER cedric.oliv...@free.fr 2009-11-14
16:46:11 EDT ---
I was misunderstanding %{name}-%{version}.jar will be josm-0 for a long
time. I wonder if you should call it like upstream josm-snapshot-svn_version.
It's now corrected :
http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/josm.spec
http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/josm-0-0.1.2255svn.fc11.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 515898] Review Request: imapfilter - A flexible client side mail filtering utility for IMAP servers
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515898 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i...@ianweller.org --- Comment #15 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2009-11-14 17:02:03 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 528108] Review Request: Vuurmuur - Firewall manager built on top of iptables
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528108
Stjepan Gros stjepan.g...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|needinfo?(stjepan.g...@gmai |
|l.com) |
--- Comment #4 from Stjepan Gros stjepan.g...@gmail.com 2009-11-14 17:06:30
EDT ---
Ok, here is the changed packet. There are few clarifications/notes:
C. %install
I'm removing .keep files in %{_buildroot} because they are not installed with
the usual 'make install' command but those directories are marked as %doc.
Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/vuurmuur/Vuurmuur.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/vuurmuur/Vuurmuur-0.7-2.fc11.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 --- Comment #11 from Greg Sabino Mullane g...@endpoint.com 2009-11-14 17:27:41 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=369558) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=369558) Improved version of replica script to test Bucardo Minor tweaks: avoids direct SQL calls -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 479527] Review Request: synfigstudio - Vector-based 2D animation studio
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479527
Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org 2009-11-14
18:18:48 EDT ---
Further review:
+ Each files section is include in %deffrag{...} and permission are properly
set.
+ Header files are in -devel package
+ On spec file, base package is required in -devel package
+ Filenames are valid UTF-8
Since synfig version is 0.62 on Koji, using koji will fail on this current
version. However, the resulting built from previous version synfig used for
review was successful on my local machine. the application is fully functional
and can be removed without issue.
In conclusion, synfigstudio fully complies with Packaging Guideline.
Make sure to update this package in 0.62.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 481528] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481528 Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br changed: What|Removed |Added Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Itamar Reis Peixoto ita...@ispbrasil.com.br 2009-11-14 18:25:11 EDT --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-DBIx-Safe New Branches: EL-5 Owners: itamarjp InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 465159] Review Request: tcexam - A Web-based Computer-Based Assessment (CBA) software
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465159 --- Comment #3 from Oron Peled o...@actcom.co.il 2009-11-14 19:39:17 EDT --- Wow, this is ancient. Are you still interested in contributing this package? Yes, I am. I rebuilt an updated package, NOT to be pushed to Fedora as is, but to be used as a working reference while we work on resolving the different issues. It is located in: SPEC: http://oron.fedorapeople.org/tcexam/tcexam.spec SRPM: http://oron.fedorapeople.org/tcexam/tcexam-9.0.035-1.fc11.src.rpm Work plan: * Package tcpdf.org: - Font issues -- started with Fedora font SIG: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-fonts-list/2009-November/msg00013.html - Maybe need to package ttf2ufm and/or afm2pfm - Coordinate with moodle packager. During my search for ttf2ufm upstream I found that tcpdf and its fonts are bundled with moodle (including in the Fedora package :-O * Verify selinux policy with dwalsh * Finally package tcexam.org itself. Can you review all this stuff, step by step, as I move along? - If yes, I will start working on the items. For every new package needed, I will add here a link to its bug report so you can easily find them. - If you do not have the time for this, I will regretfully have to return to my numb mode until someone find this bug report... Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 533725] Review Request: rubygem-linecache - Caches (Ruby source) files
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533725
--- Comment #2 from Jeroen van Meeuwen kana...@kanarip.com 2009-11-14
20:21:03 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Some notes:
* We now prefer to use %global rather than %define.
Fixed.
* Defined %ruby_sitelib macro is not used and seems unneeded.
Fixed.
* License tag should be GPLv2
Fixed.
* Make build.log more verbose (gem -V should do this), so that
we can check if Fedora specific compilation flags are correctly
honored.
Fixed, and it does.
* Please don't strip binaries by yourself and create debuginfo
rpm correctly.
Fixed.
* Enable %check, because this gem contains test/ directory
Fixed.
* Mark %geminstdir/AUTHORS or so as %doc properly.
Fixed this file, and other files as well.
* This package should not own the directory %{ruby_sitearch}/
itself.
Fixed.
* I don't think %{geminstdir}/lib can be removed.
Fixed.
* Please use defined macro (especially %geminstdir) also
in other place (like in %files)
Fixed.
New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-linecache.spec
New SRPM:
http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f12/SRPMS/rubygem-linecache-0.43-2.fc12.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 537585] Review Request: picocontainer - Dependency-injection container
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537585
--- Comment #3 from Michal Ingeli m...@v3.sk 2009-11-14 21:22:28 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #2)
1.) BuildRoot, please fix it up according to guidelines.
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root
Looking at [1], buildroot seems to be rather valid and according to guidelines.
2.) No useless comments please
#setup -q -c -n %{name}-%{version}
Right, removed that one.
3.) Please don't do the jpackage javadoc magic:
ln -s %{name}-%{version} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadocdir}/%{name}
%ghost %doc %{_javadocdir}/%{name}
Removed.
Also decided to removed -target 1.5 and -encoding param for javac as it is may
be better not force thing. And forgotten -verbose.
Spec URL: http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/intellij-idea/picocontainer.spec
SRPM URL: http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/intellij-idea/picocontainer-1.3-6.fc11.src.rpm
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 517366] Review Request: emacs-haskell-mode - Haskell editing mode for Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=517366 --- Comment #25 from Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com 2009-11-14 22:51:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) I think it is better just to move haskell-mode-init.patch into Source1: haskell-mode-init.el - doing it as a patch doesn't really make sense. Moved the haskell-mode-init.patch to source1 SPEC : http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/emacs-haskell-mode.spec SRPM : http://sagarun.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/emacs-haskell-mode-2.5.1-2.fc11.src.rpm koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1807135 Have you submitted the Makefile patch upstream - it looks pretty sane and non-fedora specific to me. Not submitted, but asked the maintainer about the Makefile his reply was I tried to package emacs-haskell-mode addon ( http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~monnier/elisp/haskell-mode.tar.gz ), when i examined the Makefile, it didn't really compile haskell-ghci.el and haskell-hugs.el. Is there any specific reason for not compiling those files? They're obsolete, only left there for those few people who insist on using them. I will send the patch to the maintainer. Otherwise I think the package looks pretty reasonable to me. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Emacs#Template_for_a_add-on_package_for_GNU_Emacs_only Thanks for the review, hope someone sponsors this package ; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #31 from Arun SAG saga...@gmail.com 2009-11-14 22:59:54 EDT --- Yesterday i built version 30.11 , Same ,local mock build hangs running /usr/bin/idn. Thanks Peter for adding the license file :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 530090] Review Request: emacs-goodies - Miscellaneous add-ons for Emacs
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530090 --- Comment #32 from Peter Galbraith p...@debian.org 2009-11-14 23:15:14 EDT --- Thanks Peter for adding the license file :) No problem! Just uploaded 31.0-1 today. It adds vm-bogofilter.el in vm-bonus-el. Up to you whether you want to add it... There's a patch for it under debian/patches Peter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 483421] Review Request: apophysis-j - Fractal flame editor and creator, based on Apophysis
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483421 Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution||NOTABUG --- Comment #9 from Ian Weller i...@ianweller.org 2009-11-15 00:06:35 EDT --- Giving up. I don't know enough Java to understand what's necessary here. Hopefully someone can pick this up in a new bug and deal with the licensing problems there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 508518] Review Request: Meiga - Easy tool for file sharing and content publishing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508518 Rajeesh rajeeshknamb...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flag||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Rajeesh rajeeshknamb...@gmail.com 2009-11-15 02:17:30 EDT --- Hi Thomas, Thanks for the review and approval! Your comments are addressed in the new build, except the gtk-update-icon-cache issue. I guess this is due to running gtk-update-icon-cache on /usr/share/pixmaps. I don't know how to fix it, or can it be simply omitted? http://rajeeshknambiar.fedorapeople.org/meiga.spec http://rajeeshknambiar.fedorapeople.org/meiga-0.3.1-2.fc11.src.rpm http://rajeeshknambiar.fedorapeople.org/meiga-0.3.1-2.fc11.i586.rpm http://rajeeshknambiar.fedorapeople.org/meiga-kde-0.3.1-2.fc11.i586.rpm I am requesting for the CVS access. New Package CVS Request === Package Name: meiga Short Description: Easy to use tool to share selected local directories via web Owners: rajeeshknambiar Branches: F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
