[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Version|devel |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-28 05:48 EST --- Ok. initng and initng-ifiles are now built against FE devel. I also requested a FC-5 branch for initng-ifiles. My problem now is that initng allready has a FC-5 branch since I erroneously imported initng 0.4.7 into cvs december last year. What do I do about this? Simply replace the files in the FC-5 directory with proper ones? Or request a new FC-5 branch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-28 10:29 EST --- I'd say simply replace the old files with the new ones. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-26 14:32 EST --- (In reply to comment #339) Ask on fedora-extras-list about getting cvsextras membership back. *sigh* It's a wonder any packages at all make it into FE. On fedora-extras-list I got the suggestion that whoever sponsored me the last time could do it again. Gauret, you around? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-26 17:57 EST --- Yes, I'm around. But since Enrico reviewed your package, it would be best for him to sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-25 09:48 EST --- So this means I'm free to commit initng against FE svn and request a build? That's good news indeed! Another completely different questions to the folks here: I just noticed that I had a process nash-hotplug running 100% all the time. Is this something init(ng) is supposed to kill? I find some rows in rc.sysinit which seems to do this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-25 13:46 EST --- Also, I noticed that I'm suddenly not member of cvsextras anymore (which I was when I looked a few hours ago). I don't really know what went wrong this time, but I guess I need someone to sponsor me again... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #136952|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-24 07:50 EST --- Created an attachment (id=137015) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=137015action=view) initng 0.6.8-3 spec file - Fix up permissions of .so files - Remove the rpath stuff that works out-of-the-box with recent cmake - Include Enrico's patch to check if there is any selinux (Thanks a lot for that one Enrico!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-24 09:06 EST --- ok, both initng and initng-ifiles are ACCEPTed - remaining rpmlint warnings can be ignored - basic checks on my system show that 'initng' works -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-23 08:34 EST --- #332 known problem. have reported it various times in this thread. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-23 09:31 EST --- Created an attachment (id=137000) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=137000action=view) check whether selinux is available before trying to use it Should fix the issues on systems not having SELinux. Please try it on SELinux enabled systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #136626|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-22 13:18 EST --- Created an attachment (id=136952) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136952action=view) initng 0.6.8-2 spec file (In reply to comment #327) while I think about it... SELinux scripts and requirements should be removed completely. FC5 policy contains already | /sbin/init(ng)? -- system_u:object_r:init_exec_t:s0 so that initng will be labeled correctly by 'rpm' itself. Something like this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] ||chemnitz.de OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-22 14:28 EST --- initng + initng-ifiles -- GOOD: * package follows naming guidelines * spec-file name is ok * I do not see a violation of packaging guidelines; it builds in mock and BuildRequires: are satisfying * license is ok and consistent * COPYING is shipped in package * I do not see a violation of Americon English (does not mean very much...;) ) * spec-file is ok * builds on i386 * package does not have locales which must be handled * scripts of -lib are calling 'ldconfig' * package owns all used directories resp. they are shipped by a dependency (except of the man-dir but this is accepted) * %clean section is ok * paths are macro'ized as far as possible; special paths like /boot or /sbin must be written literarily * content is ok * documentation is ok * headers/.so are in -lib * no pkgconfig issues * inter-(sub)package dependencies are ok * there are no .la archives * no desktop files needed and shipped initng -- BLOCKER: * permissions of plugins are bad; rpmlint complains with | W: initng unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/initng/libunneeded.so | W: initng unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/initng/libsysreq.so like messages. You should add 'chmod +x /%_lib/initng/*.so' initng-ifiles - BLOCKER: * fail to build: | [ 0%] Building C object tools/CMakeFiles/install_service.dir/install_service.o | distcc[3688] ERROR: compile (null) on localhost failed | /var/tmp/sessiondir-ensc.1158090336.eM4348/redhat/BUILD/initng-ifiles-0.0.6/tools/install_service.c:34:26: error: initng-paths.h: No such file or directory | /var/tmp/sessiondir-ensc.1158090336.eM4348/redhat/BUILD/initng-ifiles-0.0.6/tools/install_service.c:73: error: 'INITNG_PLUGIN_DIR' undeclared here (not in a function) | distcc[3687] ERROR: compile /var/tmp/sessiondir-ensc.1158090336.eM4348/redhat/BUILD/initng-ifiles-0.0.6/tools/install_service.c on localhost failed Probably an issue in 'initng' (unverified). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-22 15:13 EST --- initng -- MINOR (non-blocker): * the -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=ON is not needed anymore with cmake 2.4; see 'NOTE' section at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/cmake. I will accept it as-is, but it should be evaluated whether it works without this option too. BLOCKERS: * the permissions-problem affects -lib subpackage too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-21 02:21 EST --- I would prefer when the | Requires: policycoreutils would be in an own subpackage. 'policycoreutils' is badly packed (brings in 'initscripts', 'python' and 'pyxf86config' dependencies) and would bloat up 'initng'. Having the SElinux %script in an own subpackage with | %package selinux | Requires(pre): initng = %name-%version would allow people without SELinux to keep a small system. Alternatively, core stuff (content of the current main package) could be moved into a '-core' subpackage which is an 'Requires(pre):' of the main-page. The main-page would require and execute the heavy-weighted SELinux stuff only. This alternative has the advantage that 'yum install initng' would do the thing which is correct for 90% of users while special environments (e.g. chroots) can install the -core package with reduced dependencies. 'policycoreutils' are not required by much packages and it would be not good when 'initng' would bring it in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-21 02:38 EST --- while I think about it... SELinux scripts and requirements should be removed completely. FC5 policy contains already | /sbin/init(ng)? -- system_u:object_r:init_exec_t:s0 so that initng will be labeled correctly by 'rpm' itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-19 02:45 EST --- (In reply to comment #316) The last comment from the submitter has been made 4 months back. I guess we will give it a week and close this review request. I'm very much alive. The reason I haven't committed anything is there has been nothing to commit. I was starting to think this project was quite dead. So it's a big surprise with a new release! Anyway, I'll look into fixing the spec file up for the new release later today. Another addition to the happy news is that I've got a brand new 64 bit machine (with a C2D processor!), which means I'll be able to try the rpm's out in that environment as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #129911|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-19 08:18 EST --- Created an attachment (id=136626) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136626action=view) initng 0.6.8 spec file ...and here's the spec file for 0.6.8. Works as a charm for me, both on i386 and x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #129900|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-19 08:22 EST --- Created an attachment (id=136627) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=136627action=view) initng-ifiles 0.0.6 spec file ...and the accompanying ifiles... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-19 08:30 EST --- summary of problems left i found: 1. suspend doesent work yet (no clue why) 2. squid daemon doesent shutdown properly (needs to be zapped) 3. if vga= kernel boot param is not set tty1 shows cyrillic letters at some point of bootup (no exact clue why) 4. selinux support works but in past versions i tried there was a problem with booting up if selinux is detected to be installed but disabled. besides those small problems id really say its very useable at this point. is there a chance to get it approved now? it doesent break sysvinit and it can peacefully coexist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-19 08:51 EST --- (In reply to comment #322) summary of problems left i found: 3. if vga= kernel boot param is not set tty1 shows cyrillic letters at some point of bootup (no exact clue why) This one is really a pain in my *ss. No idea whatsoever what's wrong with it. Note that it only seems to affect stuff that's not printed out in white, ie it could have something with the ansi colour stuff to do? 4. selinux support works but in past versions i tried there was a problem with booting up if selinux is detected to be installed but disabled. This seems familiar. I'm quite sure though that this was fixed months ago. Right, Dragoran? I'm not sure though what happened to the policy stuff (#179761)? besides those small problems id really say its very useable at this point. is there a chance to get it approved now? it doesent break sysvinit and it can peacefully coexist. Well, you all know my opinion on this one... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |176581 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-19 18:30 EST --- Something bad happened to the blockers on this bug. I think it's supposed to block 176581 (the fnord review) but now it's blocking both FE-NEW and FE-REVIEW, which is obviously bogus. It's not assigned to anyone, so I don't think FE-REVIEW is accurate. I've set things the way I'm guessing they're supposed to be; if that's not correct then please set it properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-19 20:19 EST --- My bad, no cookies for me. Thanks for fixing. Considering this review has near 350 (!) comments, it should probably be assigned to someone (with sponsor privileges). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-18 06:05 EST --- new release just happened 30 seconds ago: http://download.initng.org/initng/v0.6/initng-0.6.8.tar.bz2 http://download.initng.org/initng-ifiles/v0.0/initng-ifiles-0.0.6.tar.bz2 testing has been done... its working fine for me so far. known problems: squid doesent terminate properly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-18 13:07 EST --- The last comment from the submitter has been made 4 months back. I guess we will give it a week and close this review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-18 13:10 EST --- Folks might want to look at upstart as an alternative to initng. http://www.netsplit.com/blog/work/canonical/upstart.html Supposedly it is fully compatible with existing service scripts while working very well... at least according to Ubuntu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-18 16:30 EST --- #317 been there tried that :) lets talk again once someone invested the time to create a proper jobs package and when it has selinux support. i got basic upstart spec files around if there are any takers. initng actually just wfm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 08:45 EST --- actually since theres a release scheduled on monday i did some tests with yesterdays svn of inting and ifiles. initng svn: builds without warnings on x86_64 but has rpath problems: http://rafb.net/paste/results/MdPv0942.html initng-files: doesent boot with freshly generated runlevel configs fails to mount virtual filesystem for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-06-04 10:07 EST --- additionally in case selinux is turned off it still tries to switch selinux contexts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-26 10:00 EST --- going to do another 64 bit test build with svn then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-25 07:46 EST --- (In reply to comment #309) (In reply to comment #307) #define SEND() (send(fd, rep, sizeof(bp_rep), 0) == (signed) sizeof(bp_rep)) whitout a if this does not make any sense... Fixed in upstreams svn now. still broken: cc1: warnings being treated as errors /home/dragoran/rpm/BUILD/initng-0.6.7/plugins/bash_parser/runiscript.c: In function 'main': /home/dragoran/rpm/BUILD/initng-0.6.7/plugins/bash_parser/runiscript.c:50: warning: ignoring return value of 'getcwd', declared with attribute warn_unused_result -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #129307|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-24 02:06 EST --- Created an attachment (id=129900) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129900action=view) initng-ifiles 0.0.5-1 spec file (In reply to comment #297) 0.0.5 ifiles have been release since a while now... http://download.initng.org/initng-ifiles/v0.0/ I know that. I should've uploaded it directly if just bugzilla had been working. Here goes. Nothing changed but the version number... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #129723|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-24 03:23 EST --- Created an attachment (id=129901) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129901action=view) initng 0.6.7-3 spec file Fixing what was pointed out in #294 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: initng
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459
[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #129901|0 |1
is obsolete||
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-24 08:05 EST ---
Created an attachment (id=129911)
-- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129911action=view)
initng 0.6.7-4 spec file
(In reply to comment #300)
-DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS:STRING='%{optflags}'
is stupid becuase initng is written in C you should use (or at least add)
-DCMAKE_C_FLAGS:STRING='%{optflags}' here.
You're quite right. Noticed that I'd missed Rudolfs #293, now fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-24 08:31 EST --- #300 was more or less a copy and paste typo i missed in my first comment like #301 says i corrected myself already in #293 atleast with that added at all 64 bit builds are actually real 64 bit builds :) initng 0.6.7 with 0.0.5 ifiles work quite fine here. can you confirm on 32bit that the loop module never gets probed? i have to look up where in the sysvinit stuff that is done. cant atm though... sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: initng
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-24 09:48 EST ---
Just like to note that with -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS:STRING='%{optflags}' 0.6.7 doesn't
build at all for me, I get the following:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
/home/danielm/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.7/src/initng_main.c: In function
'initng_main_segfault':
/home/danielm/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.7/src/initng_main.c:547: warning:
ignoring return value of 'write', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
/home/danielm/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.7/src/initng_main.c:559: warning:
ignoring return value of 'write', declared with attribute warn_unused_result
...whereas I don't get any warnings at all without the extra flags. I fixed the
warnings in svn by just checking the return value of write() and then doing
nothing with it, which might not be the prettiest - but working - solution.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-24 10:22 EST --- Created an attachment (id=129936) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129936action=view) plugins/selinux/initng_selinux.c here is the new initng_selinux file please test and report if it builds at all and if yes if it works better (less avcs) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #129936|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-24 10:24 EST --- Created an attachment (id=129937) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129937action=view) sorry wrong file attached again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-20 05:42 EST --- Forgot: when following the -lib suggestion you should prevent version mix either by: | Requires: %name-lib = %version-%release in main; or by | Conflicts: %name %version-%release | Conflicts: %name %version-%release in -lib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #129586|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-20 07:21 EST --- Created an attachment (id=129723) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129723action=view) initng 0.6.7-2 spec file (In reply to comment #290) 1. core package contains development files (*.so); write Did I get you right now? | Requires(post): procps | ... | init=$(ps --no-headers -o '%%c' 1) | test x$init != xinitng || /sbin/ngc --quiet -c || : Thanks! That's a lot nicer! in -devel. Alternatively (I would prefer that), you should create a '-lib' subpackage with only the libraries and require this subpackage by -devel. Something like this? 2. the | if [ -x /usr/sbin/semanage ]; then | /usr/sbin/semanage fcontext -a -t init_exec_t /sbin/initng 2/dev/null || : | fi can be expressed shorter as | /usr/sbin/semanage fcontext -a -t init_exec_t /sbin/initng 2/dev/null || : Ok. The check was introduced since you pointed out that semanage doesn't exist in FC4... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: initng
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-20 10:01 EST ---
#289
i have to correct myself. id suggets building it with:
cmake . -DBUILD_SELINUX:BOOL=ON -DCOUNT_ME:BOOL=OFF -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=ON
-DLIB_INSTALL_DIR:STRING=/%{_lib} -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS:STRING='%{optflags}'
make %{?_smp_mflags} VERBOSE=1
without the explcit setting its getting built 32 bit on x86_64 and the default
optflags should be used anyways to build it.
VERBOSE=1 with the make line will print the real output of the build. its
contraproductive to hide that because you cant see if its building right.
a hardcoded path makes a plugin yet segfault on x86_64 will be fixed in svn
soon.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: initng
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-20 11:10 EST ---
1. core package contains development files (*.so); write
Did I get you right now?
sorry, not completely ;)
* you should add
| %post lib -p /sbin/ldconfig
| %postun lib -p /sbin/ldconfig
and remove the /sbin/ldconfig from main's %scriptlets
* I am not sure about the plugins (/%{_lib}/initng); I would see them
as part of the main-package and would not ship them in -lib.
Beside the devel-ifiles chicken-egg problem, the purpose of -lib is
to avoid heavy dependencies e.g. for GUIs which are using the initng
ifiles-parser.
| if [ -x /usr/sbin/semanage ]; then
|/usr/sbin/semanage fcontext -a -t init_exec_t /sbin/initng
2/dev/null || :
| fi
can be expressed shorter as
| /usr/sbin/semanage fcontext -a -t init_exec_t /sbin/initng 2/dev/null
|| :
Ok. The check was introduced since you pointed out that semanage doesn't exist
in FC4...
My comment #239 was about a
| /usr/sbin/semanage fcontext -a -t init_exec_t /sbin/initng
statement *without* the trailing '|| :'
Current spec is ok regarding this issue.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #128936|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-19 03:43 EST --- Created an attachment (id=129586) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129586action=view) initng 0.6.7-1 spec file Biggest change is that selinux now compiles and actually seems to work! A minor drawback in this release is that it seems to require c++ devel files to build (because of a glitch in the makesystem that's already fixed in svn). Should I add a temporary build requirement in the spec file for this? Is there any opinions about how stable initng is now? Any major stuff that needs fixing? Are we getting ready for a full review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-19 04:00 EST --- #276 1. speedstep script causes an oops on shutdown 2. iptables script is suboptimal 3. iptables seems not to be started with default generated runlevels 4. #277 yeah i reported that already. its a fact that fedora seems to need a special presetup for the gettys according ot the infos i collected from the initng mailinglist. 5. chicken egg dep problem will be problematic for doing clean mock builds of both packages (main/ifiles) for future relaeses i will help testing initng before baselines/releasetags are made. yet we all seem to have been running after it... we gotta run ahead :o) personally i think with the above issues fixed its ready for release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-19 08:47 EST --- (In reply to comment #280) 4. the full explanation is somewhere on the initng mailinglist. somewhere in the 2005 archives if i am not too wrong. After a whole lot of searching in the archive I give up. The only mails I find regarding the issue are the ones where I try to solve it :-/ Back in november I was trying to make a plugin for it. What I still can't figure out is why Fedora is having these troubles when other distro's just work right out of the box. Something with utf stuff set up in the kernel? (In reply to comment #281) suspend / resume doesent work in fc5 with initng should be looked into Do you file it upstreams? I have no idea if this work with other distros... as for the chicken egg problem... not having initng depend on the ifiles would make it build in mock. Yep. And it would also mean that a whole lot of people would just do a yum install initng, reboot and then blame us when it doesn't work. Initng needs the ifiles to do any good. But do initng-devel really need initng? Or is it just common practice that foo-devel depends on foo? I noticed btw that initscripts depends on SysVinit but not the other way around. Seems strange to me... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-19 08:58 EST --- (In reply to comment #282) hah... just figured out that swap is noted used ... swapon isnt really executed and/or working at boottime. has to be investigated. Looked into it, turned out system/swap wasn't added to default runlevel. Fixed in svn. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-19 09:02 EST --- #283 well thats what i meant i think... if the comments from around nov 2005 are from you then sorry for misreferencing you. for suspend resume i am going to file it upstream once i figure out more why it barfs... anyone is invited to help me though. swsusp2 works if i swapon manually. maybe the whole not swap mounting issue hsa to do with the facts that i use LABEL for the swap partition. to be investigated. i will also discuss the issue with upstream... i am quite often on freenode #initng with nick che inconvenience vs not beeing able to build it for extras at all. you pick ;) i agree that it would be nicer if ifiles would be installed automatically if initng is pulled but currently that just cant happen. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-19 16:23 EST --- (In reply to comment #285) #283 well thats what i meant i think... if the comments from around nov 2005 are from you then sorry for misreferencing you. for suspend resume i am going to file it upstream once i figure out more why it barfs... anyone is invited to help me though. swsusp2 works if i swapon manually. maybe the whole not swap mounting issue hsa to do with the facts that i use LABEL for the swap partition. to be investigated. i will also discuss the issue with upstream... i am quite often on freenode #initng with nick che inconvenience vs not beeing able to build it for extras at all. you pick ;) i agree that it would be nicer if ifiles would be installed automatically if initng is pulled but currently that just cant happen. it would be easier to drop the initng - initng-devel dep -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: initng
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-19 22:01 EST ---
spec file issue:
add the default opt flags to the cmake line... like:
cmake . -DBUILD_SELINUX:BOOL=ON -DCOUNT_ME:BOOL=OFF -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=ON
-DLIB_INSTALL_DIR:STRING=/%{_lib} -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS:STRING='%{optflags}'
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #128740|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-17 06:26 EST --- Created an attachment (id=129307) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=129307action=view) initng-ifiles 0.0.4-1 spec file New upstreams ifiles. Nothing new in the spec. Biggest change upstreams seem to be that require_network now is gone in favour of a better solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-17 15:41 EST --- with 0.0.4 ifiles and cleanly regenned runlevels the agettys dont spawn for me. just investigating the problem. can anyone confirm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-17 17:22 EST --- #274 tested head and its already fixed there -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-13 06:50 EST --- #272 wierd... yesterdays when i sent it here upstream told me that its fixed in head already. still 0.6.6 needed the patch to package up cleanly so i thought cant hurt to submit to here :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #128844|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-12 09:13 EST --- Created an attachment (id=128936) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128936action=view) initng 0.6.6-1 spec file - New upstream version - Once again commented out the selinux stuff since I can't get it to work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-13 01:41 EST --- (In reply to comment #270) Created an attachment (id=128966) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128966action=view) [edit] 64bit libprovide libdir patch against inting-0.6.6 to be applied with -p0 I fixed this upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #128739|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-10 08:39 EST --- Created an attachment (id=128844) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128844action=view) initng 0.6.5-1 spec file - New upstream version - Removed the hardcoded /lib path New in this release is that the selinux stuff moved to a plugin, which will hopefully be an enhancement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-10 08:48 EST --- (In reply to comment #267) New in this release is that the selinux stuff moved to a plugin, which will hopefully be an enhancement. Yeah, right! Discovered that I hadn't even enabled selinux (since the way to enable it changed when it became a plugin). Enabling it (by enabling BUILD_SELINUX instead of SELINUX) broke entire build process. It's noted in upstreams bz. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #128252|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-05-08 08:30 EST --- Created an attachment (id=128739) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128739action=view) initng 0.6.4-1 spec file - New upstream version - Added lib config flag to cmake - Removed CODING_STANDARDS and FAQ that doesn't exist anymore Anyone got any solution to the chicken-egg problem? Does initng-devel really need initng? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #128253|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-27 02:05 EST --- Created an attachment (id=128285) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128285action=view) initng-ifiles 0.0.3.1-3 spec file (In reply to comment #250) 1. initng-ifiles %post doesent generate the required files... the generate script actually only does something if the -all switch is used. I really wonder why that was changed. Well, I'll add -all to it then... 3. and initng %post requires grubby to be installed. (post requires) Check again. Grubby is run from %triggerin -- mkinitrd now. (In reply to comment #251) #250: 2. audit wasnt installed on my fc5 test system (fresh install with updates) i have to look into that. not an initng problem really unless maybe of the runlevel gen... why did it add it when its not present. Hmmm... I thought audit was one of those fundamental things that was installed on all recent fedora systems? (In reply to comment #252) at some point of booting up initng output becomes russian for me. someone has to figure out what script triggers that. (probably wrong encoding?) it switches back at the end of the booting process. This one is really a pain in the ass. I tried hard to fix it a while back (check #84 above) without any success. You could try running with interactive on the grub prompt, I guess it would make it easier to determine where the problem is. (In reply to comment #259) This spec file fixes the x86_64 build issues and the rpath issues. Is this really a good idea? Hardcoding stuff in our spec file because they're hardcoded upstreams? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #128240|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-26 06:24 EST --- Created an attachment (id=128245) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128245action=view) initng 0.6.3-1 spec file From the changelog: - New upstream version - Removed selinux version check from spec, this is now upstreams - Hot reload initng in %post -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-26 08:27 EST --- just as an addition. someone posted a nice bsah-completion file on the initng mailinglist. works nicely for me and i guess some of you been waiting for beeing able to properly autocomplete ngc etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-26 08:50 EST --- you forgot to specify cmake as buildrequries in the latest 0.6.3 spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-26 08:52 EST --- RPATH Problem when building with cmake in a userbuild env: ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libhistory.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libnetprobe.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/liblockfile.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libfstat.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libcritical.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libsimplelauncher.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libreload.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libchroot.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libenvparser.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libpause.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libsyslog.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libstcmd.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libinitctl.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libfind.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src]ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/liblast.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src]ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/librlparser.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libdebug_commands.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/librunlevel.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libbashlaunch.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libunneeded.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libnge.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libinteractive.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libsyncron.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libalso.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src]ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libidleprobe.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/liblogfile.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libstdout.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file '/lib/initng/libcpout.so' contains an invalid rpath '/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src' in [/home/rkl/rpmbuild/BUILD/initng-0.6.3/src] ERROR 0002: file
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-26 08:57 EST --- initng-ifiles 0.0.3.1 needs initng-devel as buildrequires. if you do test builds with mock you wont miss such buildrequires problems in the future. sorry for the amount of posts... but since i tested cvs shortly before release i didnt expect that many problems to pop up... i still used autotools for building though back then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-26 09:05 EST --- damn... another one... initng-0.6.3 %post scriptlet always fails if initng isnt installed. the scriptlet should only be executed at update not at install time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #128245|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-26 09:47 EST --- Created an attachment (id=128252) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128252action=view) initng 0.6.3-2 spec file - Only hot reload initng if there is a initng process - Add cmake back to buildrequires And yes, those rpath errors are back. Anyone knows what to do this time? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #128142|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-26 09:51 EST --- Created an attachment (id=128253) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128253action=view) initng-ifiles 0.0.3.1-2 spec file Added initng-devel to buildrequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-26 10:00 EST --- thanks for your quick fixes. i have another 3 things that need fixing though: 1. initng-ifiles %post doesent generate the required files... the generate script actually only does something if the -all switch is used. 2. system/auditd doesent start because /etc/init.d/auditd doesent exist 3. and initng %post requires grubby to be installed. (post requires) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-26 10:12 EST --- #250: 2. audit wasnt installed on my fc5 test system (fresh install with updates) i have to look into that. not an initng problem really unless maybe of the runlevel gen... why did it add it when its not present. with all the stuff fixed above everything is running quite fine. one of the things i dont like though is the current iptables script in initng... maybe it would make sense to patch it to use the existing init scripts of the sysvinit for start and stop. would be better and easy to maintain. just a suggestion that has to be discussed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-26 10:35 EST --- at some point of booting up initng output becomes russian for me. someone has to figure out what script triggers that. (probably wrong encoding?) it switches back at the end of the booting process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 173459] Review Request: initng
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=173459 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-04-26 13:06 EST --- Created an attachment (id=128268) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=128268action=view) new spec file This spec file fixes the x86_64 build issues and the rpath issues. The only porblem that I have is that gen_system_runlevel does not seem to generate a runlevel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
