[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-13 10:51 EST --- Okay, in the forthcoming 0.1.3 build, xy_XY translations have all been moved to just xy, where they really ought to be. The remaining unowned translation directories will be added to the filesystem package, once I've collected all of them from all the latest beryl components. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-12-12 11:32 EST --- Blah, sorry for the delayed response. I've been completely tied up with another project (my day job deals mostly w/the rhel kernel, not fedora). I hope to be able to look at this today, along with hopefully spinning 0.1.3 packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-28 18:02 EST --- Is there any progress with language directories ownership? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-22 14:11 EST --- (In reply to comment #17) Whoops, yes, been meaning to address that, its still on my todo list. I need to dig up a high(er) resolution beryl icon and throw it in there. I found beryl .svg icon here: http://tinyurl.com/y6xg3e and it seems to me that it may come in useful :) (In reply to comment #17) I also still need to look into the po/mo files being created... I have checked it and I found that: * tr_TR is Turkish * gl_ES is Gallegan (Spain) * sk_SK is Slovakian * sv_FI is Swedish (Finland) These languages dirs without doubt should be owned by another packages, but (I checked it) they aren't. ar_AR is probably Arabic but no idea what my_MY is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-22 14:33 EST --- (In reply to comment #18) I have checked it and I found that: * tr_TR is Turkish tr_TR is for turkish but the translation catalogs for turkish is named tr and installed under /usr/share/locale/tr/ which is owned by filesystem rpm. I guess xx_XX should be renamed to xx and for other translation catalogs directories should be owned. But I'm not sure about the standards of this naming scheme as filesystem installs both fr and fr_FR directories (although on my system only beryl/emerald packages consume the latter). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-22 14:42 EST --- Just pushed a new beryl-manager build with a desktop file added, still need to address the lang stuff. I noticed the same thing -- that some of the xx_XX ones looked like they could simply be renamed to xx, but not sure what's up with the others. Looks like I'll need to talk with the owner of filesystem and/or our translation folks... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-22 16:21 EST --- (In reply to comment #20) Just pushed a new beryl-manager build with a desktop file added, still need to address the lang stuff. I noticed the same thing -- that some of the xx_XX ones looked like they could simply be renamed to xx, but not sure what's up with the others. It may be especially difficult with Swedish language, as there are Swedish Finland and Swedish Sweden language. In fact, I don't think the Swedish Finland is really needed ;) In my opinion these languages need to be updated in filesystem package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-21 22:04 EST --- (In reply to comment #16) Hmmm... are you going to create a desktop file I mentioned above? Whoops, yes, been meaning to address that, its still on my todo list. I need to dig up a high(er) resolution beryl icon and throw it in there. I'll see what I can do on that front tonight or tomorrow. I also still need to look into the po/mo files being created... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-17 06:57 EST --- Are the names of these po/mo files correct? ar_AR, tr_TR, my_MY etc. They are creating new directories under /usr/share/locale that no package own. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-16 10:48 EST --- After a little testing of this package I think that it should have its own desktop file. It is tray application so user should have a possibility to run it from menu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-15 10:38 EST --- Okay, just pushed a build of beryl-core for devel that creates a beryl package that depends on beryl-gnome, beryl-kde and bdock, then beryl-gnome and beryl-kde packages that depend on all their respective bits. Basically, yum install beryl-gnome gives you everything but bdock and aquamarine, yum install beryl-kde gives you everything but bdock and heliodor, and yum install beryl gives you the kitchen sink. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-15 16:05 EST --- Importing into CVS now, requesting branching momentarily. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 Bug 209260 depends on bug 209259, which changed state. Bug 209259 Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 What|Old Value |New Value Resolution||NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-14 14:02 EST --- Latest build, uses upstream tarballs, since they finally started making them: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl-manager-0.1.2-2.fc6.src.rpm As for where to talk about problems with running the software, that would probably be best to take upstream to http://forums.beryl-project.org/, http://bugs.bery-project.org/ or #bery on irc.freenode.net, at least until such time as these packages are actually part of Fedora Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-14 16:43 EST --- MUST items: * rpmlint is quiet * package is named well * spec file name is good * package meets Packaging Guidelines * package is licensed with a GPL open-source compatible license * License field in spec file matches actual license * license file is included in %doc * md5sums are matching (50c0235d59369674827ceaec7d36e53b) * package successfully compiles on x86_64 * BuildRequires listed well (mock builds succesfully) * spec file handles locales properly * no need to %post and %postun sections * not relocatable * package owns directories well * no duplicates in %files * every %files section includes %defattr * proper %clean section * macros used well Package looks almost well. I haven't checked the another beryl packages yet, but you use Provides: beryl in beryl-core package and here you're using Requires: beryl-core. Maybe Requires: beryl would be better? And the another thing: if a normal user type `yum install beryl`, he won't get working beryl environment. He'll get only a beryl-core package which alone is useless. Maybe you should create dependencies differently to make possibility to install all essential beryl packages by simply typying `yum install beryl`? How do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-14 17:21 EST --- (In reply to comment #9) Package looks almost well. I haven't checked the another beryl packages yet, but you use Provides: beryl in beryl-core package and here you're using Requires: beryl-core. Maybe Requires: beryl would be better? I'm thinking stick with beryl-core in the sub-packages, for the reason below... And the another thing: if a normal user type `yum install beryl`, he won't get working beryl environment. He'll get only a beryl-core package which alone is useless. Maybe you should create dependencies differently to make possibility to install all essential beryl packages by simply typying `yum install beryl`? How do you think? I initially did Provides: beryl in beryl-core because it seemed right at the time. It did cross my mind the other day to perhaps switch to a beryl meta-package that Requires: all the beryl components. Only downside with that is that it can suck in a fair amount of stuff now that people may not want if they're running one desktop or another (i.e. kde vs. gnome, where aquamarine Requires: some kde stuff, heliodor Requires: some gnome stuff). Could do three meta-packages, beryl, which in turn Requires: beryl-kde and beryl-gnome, which in turn Requires: packages appropriately for each DE. Some scheme along these lines definitely seems better than beryl-core Provides: beryl, which does indeed provide nothing of use in the case of a user yum installing only beryl. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-14 18:04 EST --- I initially did Provides: beryl in beryl-core because it seemed right at the time. It did cross my mind the other day to perhaps switch to a beryl meta-package that Requires: all the beryl components. Only downside with that is that it can suck in a fair amount of stuff now that people may not want if they're running one desktop or another (i.e. kde vs. gnome, where aquamarine Requires: some kde stuff, heliodor Requires: some gnome stuff). Could do three meta-packages, beryl, which in turn Requires: beryl-kde and beryl-gnome, which in turn Requires: packages appropriately for each DE. It sounds wisely for me, I think it's a good solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-06 18:54 EST --- They work well here, but I think there's still a few bugs to be ironed out. If I set beryl-manager to load on login (Gnome 2.16, FC6, nVidia card) about half the time I get windows that show their contents, but that are unresponsive and the window borders flicker on and off. My CPU monitor applet shows 100% use. Reloading the WM or doing ctrl + alt + F1 and then ctrl + alt + F7 hangs the machine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-11-02 11:09 EST --- From the current repo version, using beryl-manager to switch to compiz fails for me. Could be a gnome-window-decorator bug since it seems the --replace switch is not replacing emerald. Selecting compiz with COW breaks compiz such that it won't actually work again until you reset the /apps/compiz/general/allscreens/options/active_plugins key to default values. I've had these two problems on both intel and nvidia hardware. I'm not sure if these are upstream bugs or FC6 specific ones. Unfortunately for me, beryl on my dual head nvidia box also seems to make many windows just black (firefox particularly). One reason for me to use it is for better xinerama support. I don't see this black window problem on my single head nvidia box or my intel laptop. Is there a place to talk about problems with these rpms on FC6? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-27 06:40 EST --- Yes, it's still needed: checking for intltool = 0.35.0... 0.34.2 found configure: error: Your intltool is too old. You need intltool 0.35.0 or later. It builds fine with intltool 0.34.2 and my patch however. Patch updated here: http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/xgl/beryl-manager-0.1.1-intltool.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-26 11:44 EST --- Aurelien, can you double-check if that patch is still required for beryl-manager 0.1.1? I've just pushed out a 0.1.1 build, but don't have an FC5 machine handy at the moment, nor the time to get one mocked up. :) http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl-manager-0.1.1-1.fc6.src.rpm As for the compiz integration (comment #2), I believe we should have inherited that same support by moving to 0.1.1 (will double-check when I have a chance). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] BugsThisDependsOn||209259 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-08 20:15 EST --- I needed to add this patch to make it build on FC5 : http://gauret.free.fr/fichiers/rpms/fedora/xgl/beryl-manager-0.1.0-intltool.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-06 02:22 EST --- Created an attachment (id=137896) -- (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=137896action=view) compiz integration With this patch it can switch to gnome-window-decorator if compiz is selected -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 209260] Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-manager - Beryl window decorator and theme management utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209260 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-05 15:06 EST --- Just uploaded a -2 build of beryl-manager that fixes a pathless reference to pidof (not in normal users path) and adds gnome-window-manager and compiz to the beryl-manager menu (tested it out, works great, only caveat is that when changing from beryl to compiz, you need to switch from beryl/emerald to beryl/gnome-window-decorator to compiz, or the window decorations in compiz get tanked). http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl-manager.spec http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl-manager-0.1.0-2.fc6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
