[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution||NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-03 18:27:50 EDT --- stk-4.3.1-6.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-10-03 18:35:40 EDT --- stk-4.3.1-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-24 20:01:40 EDT --- stk-4.3.1-6.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update stk'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F8/FEDORA-2008-8185 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-24 20:23:29 EDT --- stk-4.3.1-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update stk'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-8333 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-19 06:39:53 EDT --- stk-4.3.1-6.fc8 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 8. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stk-4.3.1-6.fc8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-19 06:41:07 EDT --- stk-4.3.1-6.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stk-4.3.1-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 10:46:59 EDT --- Package built fine in Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=828097 This package (stk) is APPROVED by me -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 --- Comment #19 from Thomas Moschny [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 14:26:55 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request === Package Name: stk Short Description: Synthesis ToolKit in C++ Owners: thm Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: none Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #20 from Huzaifa S. Sidhpurwala [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-16 23:15:55 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215
--- Comment #14 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-09
12:58:35 EDT ---
Can you split %{_libdir}/libstk.a into another package (-static)
if the static version is really needed. (I expect not...)
Then I think we are good...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 --- Comment #15 from Thomas Moschny [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-09 14:55:54 EDT --- Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/stk.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/stk-4.3.1-5.fc9.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Sep 9 2008 Thomas Moschny ... - 4.3.1-5 - Don't ship the static library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 --- Comment #13 from Thomas Moschny [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-08 03:08:53 EDT --- Thanks, spot. So, for now, I removed them all. Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/stk.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/stk-4.3.1-4.fc9.src.rpm %changelog * Sun Sep 7 2008 Thomas Moschny ... - 4.3.1-4 - Remove all .mid and .ski files from the tarball. - Add README.fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment #10 from Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-02 12:29:46 EDT --- What is the legal concern here? Do you just want me to do a general audit on the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Moschny [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-02 14:27:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) What is the legal concern here? Do you just want me to do a general audit on the package? In short: yes. Long answer: Even after talking to upstream, the legal status of some files remains unclear to me, especially that of the .mdi and .ski files. Quoting Gary Scavone, one of the authors: ... I think there should be no issue with the .ski files because most were originally created by Perry Cook himself. It is possible a few were created by Craig Sapp's MIDI to SKINI converter from MIDI files (though only Bach pieces). As for the MIDI files, I downloaded a few over time, like the bach fugue. I think the copyright notice you see there (David Huron) is for the software that was used to do the MIDI to SKINI conversion. Bach's music is clearly no longer copyright protected. So, if there's any issue, it _might_ be the tango, but I don't know if that has an author. Worst case ... just delete the tango file, since the other stuff is Bach and the rights are clear. ... While the music (composition) itself might not be copyright protected anymore, a certain performance might be, I think. There are three midi files: - bwv772.mid has a notice that says the harpsichord was played by John Sankey. Here's his copyright notice: http://www.sankey.ws/copyright.html. - tango.mid has Copyright 1996 R Finley, might be that one: http://www.classicalarchives.com/info/tango.txt. - jesu.mid has Copyright (C) 1992 MTA All rights reserved. I don't know who/what MTA is. Not sure what to do about these three files, and I think some of the .ski files might be problematic as well. Easiest solution would be to simply remove all of them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 --- Comment #12 from Tom spot Callaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-09-02 16:04:21 EDT --- Agreed. Remove them all. If and only if you can: * clearly determine the copyright holder * explicitly confirm from the copyright holder that we have permission to use the content under an acceptable license. Then, you can include those files on a case-by-case basis. It might not be a bad idea to look for some Creative Commons licensed mid or ski files as possible replacements, or to ask on some of the Fedora lists if any musicians want to make some for you. Only thing you need to avoid are any of the files which are marked NC or No Commercial. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 Thomas Moschny [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Moschny [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-08-10 08:38:59 EDT --- Current status of this package: Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/stk.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/stk-4.3.1-3.fc9.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Jul 31 2008 Thomas Moschny ... - 4.3.1-3 - Remove src/include/dsound.h, and src/include/*asio* files from the tarball, for legal reasons. Only used on windows anyway. - Remove src/include/soundcard.h (explicitly forbids modification) and disable OSS support. - Build and pack Md2Skini. - Build and pack the examples. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-21 02:51 EST --- (In reply to comment #7) There is a list of undefined-non-weak-symbol that are usually the sign of a missing LIB_ADD Flagh at linkig time. -ljack -lpthread and others Theses symbols will be resolved at runtime if not specified are linking time. And may silently break if they are not found. Do you really see that with my latest version, 4.3.1-2 (see comment #4)? stk.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 4.3.1-1 4.3.1-1.fc8.kwizart Hmm, seems you checked on old version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-20 06:57 EST --- for src/include/dsound.h I expect it shouldn't be ship in this release. Instead win32 users will need to download this file separely. for src/include/soundcard.h, This file explicitely prevent modification. As such we cannot allow this. But there is another soundcard.h (licensed as GPLv2 only) that can be downloaded from http://www.4front-tech.com/developer/sources/stable/ There is others license available, but I think linux support will need the GPLv2 version. So i think there is two solutions: - repack the sources with soundcard.h Gplv2 version (and remove src/include/dsound.h will be needed anyhow). - Or disable OSS support with the filed removed. Fedora doesn't use OSS anyway (only emulated from alsa), so if needed, it could be possible to have a replacement version (in _libdir/stk-oss ). My guess is that ABI compatibility will be preserved in the dependent applications (but maybe i'm wrong). For the ski,mid file, it would be fine to have the respective authors to be aware of providing a free license (Creative commons?) when they are provided within FOSS. Not all files have an Author but there is at least: ///YEM: Rights to all derivative electronic formats reserved. in projects/examples/scores/bachfugue.ski If unsure, they can still be removed... Anyway it would be nice to ask upstream for advices on each cases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-20 17:17 EST --- There is a list of undefined-non-weak-symbol that are usually the sign of a missing LIB_ADD Flagh at linkig time. -ljack -lpthread and others Theses symbols will be resolved at runtime if not specified are linking time. And may silently break if they are not found. stk.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 4.3.1-1 4.3.1-1.fc8.kwizart stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_pcm_hw_params_set_channels stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_pcm_hw_params_set_period_size_near stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_pcm_readi stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 jack_on_shutdown stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 jack_port_name stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_pcm_hw_params_set_rate_near stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_seq_port_info_get_name stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_seq_free_event stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_seq_port_subscribe_free stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 jack_connect stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_seq_port_info_get_client stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_seq_event_output stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_pcm_state_name stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_seq_port_info_set_port stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 jack_port_by_name stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_seq_client_info_sizeof stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_midi_event_init stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_pcm_hw_params_set_access stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 jack_set_process_callback stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_strerror stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_seq_client_id stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_pcm_format_cpu_endian stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_pcm_info_set_device stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_seq_event_input stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_pcm_close stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 jack_deactivate stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 jack_client_new stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 jack_port_register stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_seq_create_simple_port stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 jack_set_xrun_callback stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_pcm_info_set_subdevice stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_seq_port_subscribe_set_time_real stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_pcm_hw_params_set_periods_near stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_pcm_writen stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_seq_drain_output stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_card_get_name stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 jack_port_get_buffer stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_seq_port_info_set_timestamping stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_pcm_state stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_seq_query_next_client stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_seq_queue_tempo_set_tempo stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 jack_get_ports stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_pcm_hw_params_get_channels_min stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_seq_unsubscribe_port stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_seq_open stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_midi_event_resize_buffer stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libstk.so.4.3.1 snd_midi_event_free stk.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-16 04:11 EST --- Spec URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/stk.spec SRPM URL: http://thm.fedorapeople.org/stk-4.3.1-2.fc9.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Jul 15 2008 Thomas Moschny .. - 4.3.1-2 - Update sharedlib patch, fixes alsa problem. - Fix path for include files in -devel. - Change path for docs in -devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-16 04:15 EST --- Here's the list of files with (at least to me) unclear legal status - src/include/dsound.h - src/include/soundcard.h - projects/demo/scores/*.ski - projects/examples/scores/*.ski - projects/examples/midifiles/*.mid - doc/html/tutorial/*.ski It would be nice if someone could comment or help me sorting this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED] Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag||fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-08 12:33 EST --- That' very strange, they use an autotools configure script but the Makefile.in isn't automake compliant. Is there any reasons not to move to an plain Makefile.am file (using automake and probably libtool also)? Do you know if there is problem while realtime is enabled and if it will lead to ABI changes ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-08 14:27 EST --- (In reply to comment #1) That' very strange, they use an autotools configure script but the Makefile.in isn't automake compliant. I think it is perfectly alright to use autoconf but not automake. Is there any reasons not to move to an plain Makefile.am file (using automake and probably libtool also)? That'd be an upstream decision, and it would probably alleviate building the shared lib for us. But honestly, my sharedlib patch isn't that complicated, and as far as I see, it's working. So I'm not going to waste my time struggling with autotools, unless I can clearly see what gain that could have. We don't care whether it's portable or something, as long as it works on Fedora. Other way round, do you see anything not working properly the way it is now? Do you know if there is problem while realtime is enabled and if it will lead to ABI changes ? Can you rephrase, please? I don't understand that question. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||443771 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
[Bug 454215] Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: stk - Synthesis ToolKit in C++ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454215 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn|443771 | OtherBugsDependingO||443771 nThis|| --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2008-07-08 14:39 EST --- Ops. Wrong order of bug dependency, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@redhat.com http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
