[Bug 483045] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies

2009-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483045





--- Comment #10 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com  2009-02-13 03:20:15 
EDT ---
looks ok now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 483045] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies

2009-02-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483045


Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rc040...@freenet.de




--- Comment #6 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de  2009-02-12 08:13:59 
EDT ---
This package suffers from a larger number of clashes with perl-Test-Unit:

(In reply to comment #2)

 + Package perl-Test-Unit-Lite-0.1101-1.fc11 =
 Provides: perl(Test::Unit::Debug) perl(Test::Unit::HarnessUnit)
 perl(Test::Unit::Lite) = 0.11 perl(Test::Unit::Lite::AllTests)
 perl(Test::Unit::Result) perl(Test::Unit::TestCase)
  perl(Test::Unit::TestRunner) perl(Test::Unit::TestSuite)


# rpm -ql --provides perl-Test-Unit
..
perl(Test::Unit::Result) 
.. 
perl(Test::Unit::Runner)  
perl(Test::Unit::TestCase)  
..
perl(Test::Unit::TestRunner)  
perl(Test::Unit::TestSuite)  


I'd suggest to filter these out of perl-Test-Unit-Lite

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 483045] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies

2009-02-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483045





--- Comment #7 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com  2009-02-12 10:32:55 
EDT ---
Ralf,
 Please help me to understand how to avoid such clashes in future perl
package reviews? I think I just looked into code and see what META.yml said as
provides. Also, I successfully installed this package using rpm command where I
have already installed perl-Test-Unit. Did I miss anything in this review for
such clash?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 483045] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies

2009-02-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483045





--- Comment #8 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de  2009-02-12 11:33:04 
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
  Please help me to understand how to avoid such clashes in future perl
 package reviews?
These are hard to catch.

The only semi-systematic approach I am aware about is to iterate through
repoquery --whatprovides 'perl(..)' on all provides a perl package provides.

I only caught these in this particular case, because another package
BR'ed: perl(Test::Unit::TestCase),
which resulted into this:

# repoquery --whatprovides 'perl(Test::Unit::TestCase)'
perl-Test-Unit-0:0.25-4.fc9.noarch
perl-Test-Unit-0:0.25-4.fc9.noarch
perl-Test-Unit-Lite-0:0.1101-1.fc10.noarch

 I think I just looked into code and see what META.yml said as
 provides. Also, I successfully installed this package using rpm command where 
 I
 have already installed perl-Test-Unit.
Right, I am also observing this, but ... 

what is 
BR: perl(Test::Unit::TestCase)
supposed to do?

IMO, to pull-in the actual perl(Test::Unit::TestCase) module, i.e. the version
from perl-Test-Unit, not the lite version from perl-Test-Unit-Lite.

I fear, we are facing the tip of an iceberg of hidden issues.

 Did I miss anything in this review for
 such clash?
Strictly speaking, yes - but we all are humans :-)

I likely also would not have caught this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 483045] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies

2009-02-12 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483045





--- Comment #9 from Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com  2009-02-12 11:59:48 
EDT ---
Hi,

Please take a look in this scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1122217

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 483045] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies

2009-02-06 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483045


Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution||NEXTRELEASE




--- Comment #5 from Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com  2009-02-06 05:56:52 
EDT ---
Builds fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=7656

Closing now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 483045] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies

2009-02-05 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483045


Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+




--- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi ke...@tummy.com  2009-02-05 21:47:10 EDT ---
cvs done.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 483045] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies

2009-02-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483045


Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+




--- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com  2009-02-04 03:55:32 
EDT ---
Review:
+ package builds in mock (rawhide i386).
koji Build = http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1103094
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream url
bad27502bda4377fa6e7e39602b82aab  Test-Unit-Lite-0.1101.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ make test gave
All tests successful.
Files=2, Tests=54,  1 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr  0.00 sys +  0.66 cusr  0.02
csys =  0.71 CPU)

+ Package perl-Test-Unit-Lite-0.1101-1.fc11 =
Provides: perl(Test::Unit::Debug) perl(Test::Unit::HarnessUnit)
perl(Test::Unit::Lite) = 0.11 perl(Test::Unit::Lite::AllTests)
perl(Test::Unit::Result) perl(Test::Unit::TestCase)
 perl(Test::Unit::TestRunner) perl(Test::Unit::TestSuite)

Requires: perl = 0:5.006 perl(Carp) perl(Cwd) perl(Exporter)
perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Copy) perl(File::Find) perl(File::Path)
perl(File::Spec) perl(Symbol) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings)

Suggestions:
1) Take care to remove BR:perl before committing to cvs

Another thing, I see META.yml specifies which provides: this package should
provide which this package already providing so I see no filter required here.

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 483045] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies

2009-02-04 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483045


Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Flag||fedora-cvs?




--- Comment #3 from Allisson Azevedo allis...@gmail.com  2009-02-04 05:27:14 
EDT ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: perl-Test-Unit-Lite
Short Description: Unit testing without external dependencies
Owners: allisson
Branches: F-10 F-9

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 483045] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies

2009-01-30 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483045


Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 AssignedTo|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com
   Flag||fedora-review?




-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review


[Bug 483045] Review Request: perl-Test-Unit-Lite - Unit testing without external dependencies

2009-01-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483045


Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||panem...@gmail.com




--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com  2009-01-29 11:03:21 
EDT ---
Not needed BuildRequires:  perl = 0:5.006

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@redhat.com
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review