Re: [FFmpeg-user] MPEG-DASH
Thank you very much for your recommendations! Mirek -Původní zpráva- From: Werner Robitza Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 9:50 PM To: FFmpeg user questions Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-user] MPEG-DASH On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Knapek Miroslav kna...@mmsw.cz wrote: I would like to kindly ask you for help. I try to encode my first mpeg-dash video using these steps: http://www.dash-player.com/blog/2014/11/mpeg-dash-content-generation-using-mp4box-and-x264/. I use panasonic camcoder MTS fullHD file as source. I am able to pass all three steps, but there is missing audio track in MP4 video after first conversion by x264.exe. This is more of a question to ask on the respective MP4Box / GPAC channels. Is somewhere any “tutorial” how to prepare MPEG-DASH content by ffmpeg? Not yet. There is an undocumented dashenc muxer. I requested a bit of information on how to use it here: http://mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/ffmpeg-user/2015-January/025046.html -- but until then, I would consider its functionality extremely limited. You can of course check the source file if you want. All in all, I would stick to using MP4Box for now. You may find other software here: http://dashif.org/software/ ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Re: [FFmpeg-user] Duplication of time stamps when concatenating .mkv files
Did you try to use the reset_timestamps segment option? Thanks for responding. I tried this but got the same result. As you can see from the output I provided in the first post, I used this command when splitting the video up. This time, I used it when merging (which I'm guessing is what your suggestion was) and got the same result. Any other ideas? ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
[FFmpeg-user] filterstats broadcast legal report
Hi all, I'd like to set up a command to find out if a video is broadcast legal. I've tried to understand how signalstats works but I need some help. I tried the examples in the ffmpeg filter documentation, like the one pasted below, but I'd like to customize it to my needs. Ideally It would output a list of frames that do not meet broadcast specs. FWIW, the video is Quicktime wrapped DNxHD. Thank you! $ ffprobe -f lavfi movie=INPUTFILE.mov,signalstats=stat=brng -show_frames ffprobe version 2.4.2 Copyright (c) 2007-2014 the FFmpeg developers built on Oct 28 2014 17:39:46 with Apple LLVM version 5.1 (clang-503.0.40) (based on LLVM 3.4svn) configuration: --prefix=/usr/local/Cellar/ffmpeg/2.4.2 --enable-shared --enable-pthreads --enable-gpl --enable-version3 --enable-nonfree --enable-hardcoded-tables --enable-avresample --enable-vda --cc=clang --host-cflags= --host-ldflags= --enable-libx264 --enable-libfaac --enable-libmp3lame --enable-libxvid --enable-libfreetype --enable-libtheora --enable-libvorbis --enable-libvpx --enable-librtmp --enable-libopencore-amrnb --enable-libopencore-amrwb --enable-libvo-aacenc --enable-libass --enable-ffplay --enable-libspeex --enable-libschroedinger --enable-libfdk-aac --enable-libopus --enable-frei0r --enable-libopenjpeg --extra-cflags='-I/usr/local/Cellar/openjpeg/1.5.1_1/include/openjpeg-1.5 ' libavutil 54. 7.100 / 54. 7.100 libavcodec 56. 1.100 / 56. 1.100 libavformat56. 4.101 / 56. 4.101 libavdevice56. 0.100 / 56. 0.100 libavfilter 5. 1.100 / 5. 1.100 libavresample 2. 1. 0 / 2. 1. 0 libswscale 3. 0.100 / 3. 0.100 libswresample 1. 1.100 / 1. 1.100 libpostproc53. 0.100 / 53. 0.100 Input #0, lavfi, from 'movie=INPUTFILE.mov,signalstats=stat=brng': Duration: N/A, start: 0.00, bitrate: N/A Stream #0:0: Video: rawvideo (Y42B / 0x42323459), yuv422p, 1920x1080 [SAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], 25 tbr, 25 tbn, 25 tbc [FRAME] media_type=video key_frame=1 pkt_pts=0 pkt_pts_time=0.00 pkt_dts=0 pkt_dts_time=0.00 best_effort_timestamp=0 best_effort_timestamp_time=0.00 pkt_duration=1 pkt_duration_time=0.04 pkt_pos=577024 pkt_size=4147200 width=1920 height=1080 pix_fmt=yuv422p sample_aspect_ratio=1:1 pict_type=I coded_picture_number=0 display_picture_number=0 interlaced_frame=0 top_field_first=0 repeat_pict=0 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.YMIN=12 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.YLOW=58 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.YAVG=74.9742 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.YHIGH=84 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.YMAX=241 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.UMIN=36 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.ULOW=145 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.UAVG=150.074 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.UHIGH=158 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.UMAX=166 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.VMIN=47 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.VLOW=98 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.VAVG=106.101 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.VHIGH=112 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.VMAX=174 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.SATMIN=0 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.SATLOW=24 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.SATAVG=32.6906 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.SATHIGH=42 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.SATMAX=99 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.HUEMED=313 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.HUEAVG=308.107 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.YDIF=0 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.UDIF=0 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.VDIF=0 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.BRNG=0.00231144 [/FRAME] etc ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Re: [FFmpeg-user] IVTC with pullup filter
Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote marcjn gmail.com writes: I could submit sample and logIf you don't submit them, help is extremely unlikely afaict.(This is of course not pullup related.)Carl Eugen___ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user I don't see my recent mails to the list posted here so I will try from my browser (I am new to this mail list format).I have been trying to convert a telecined clip (29.97 fps) to a progressive one (23.976 fps).The clip I am using for test purpose is here: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71351606/TermSample2.mp4 https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71351606/TermSample2.mp4 The sample contains a x.264 video stream and an AAC 2-channel audio stream. I first tried to use -vf pullup, fps=24000/1001: The log is here https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71351606/pullup_fps.log The result was a 23.976 fps clip, showing up as 'progressive' with MediaInfo, but with 2 progressive frames, followed by 2 frames each blending 2 fields (combing). I also tried -vf pullup -r 24000/1001 as some users mentioned that this worked for them:Here is the log: here https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71351606/pullup_rate.log The result was the same: 2 progressive frames followed by 2 blended ones. I then tried -vf fieldmatch,decimate: The log is here https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71351606/fieldmatch_decimate.log Different result here: most of the time, we have 3 progressive + 1 blended frame, but on occasion 2 progressive + 2 blended.I do hope someone knows how to make IVCT work under ffmpeg.Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://ffmpeg-users.933282.n4.nabble.com/IVTC-with-pullup-filter-tp4661581p4669243.html Sent from the FFmpeg-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Re: [FFmpeg-user] IVTC with pullup filter
On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 3:24 PM, Nicholas Robbins nickrobb...@yahoo.com wrote: On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 3:21 PM, Nicholas Robbins nickrobb...@yahoo.com wrote: I think your problem is that your media is not actually 29.97 fps. ffprobe reports 28.97 fps, multiplying that by 4/5 gives 23.76 Try just -vf pullup,fps=23.176 no fps argument. Don't know why I said no fps argument. Try -vf pullup,fps=23.176 Or try a different output format. If you use mkv as the output it seems to work, and counting frames gives a fps of 22.109 fps. Where are you getting this video? 28.97 fps is very strange. --Nick ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Re: [FFmpeg-user] IVTC with pullup filter
On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 3:21 PM, Nicholas Robbins nickrobb...@yahoo.com wrote: I think your problem is that your media is not actually 29.97 fps. ffprobe reports 28.97 fps, multiplying that by 4/5 gives 23.76 Try just -vf pullup,fps=23.176 no fps argument. Don't know why I said no fps argument. Try -vf pullup,fps=23.176 -Nick ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Re: [FFmpeg-user] IVTC with pullup filter
Nicholas Robbins-2 wrote On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 3:24 PM, Nicholas Robbins lt; nickrobbins@ gt; wrote: On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 3:21 PM, Nicholas Robbins lt; nickrobbins@ gt; wrote: I think your problem is that your media is not actually 29.97 fps. ffprobe reports 28.97 fps, multiplying that by 4/5 gives 23.76 Try just -vf pullup,fps=23.176 no fps argument. Don't know why I said no fps argument. Try -vf pullup,fps=23.176 Or try a different output format. If you use mkv as the output it seems to work, and counting frames gives a fps of 22.109 fps. Where are you getting this video? 28.97 fps is very strange. --Nick ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user My mistake. I can't believe I did that and overlooked it . Thanks for looking at the sample. The reason for the strange frame rate: I created that clip from a 29.97 fps telecined recording, and to be sure I had a constant 29.97 fps, I wrote -r 29000/1001 instead of 3/1001. I am adding a hopefully 'correct' 29.97 fps TermSample3.mp4 sample here https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71351606/TermSample3.mp4 Now, using -vf pullup,fps=23.177 on the original sample still gives me 2 progressive + 2 blended frames when runnning the command (see log here https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71351606/pullup_fps20.log ) Using -vf pullup,fps=24000/1001 on the new 29.97 fps sample (TermSample3.mp4), I still get the same result (see log here https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71351606/pullup_fps3.log ) I will look at mkv as well but it seems that my frame rate error doesn't explain the issue at this point. -- View this message in context: http://ffmpeg-users.933282.n4.nabble.com/IVTC-with-pullup-filter-tp4661581p4669248.html Sent from the FFmpeg-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Re: [FFmpeg-user] IVTC with pullup filter
On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 1:34 PM, marcjn windbr...@gmail.com wrote: Carl Eugen Hoyos wrote marcjn gmail.com writes: I could submit sample and logIf you don't submit them, help is extremely unlikely afaict.(This is of course not pullup related.)Carl Eugen___ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user I don't see my recent mails to the list posted here so I will try from my browser (I am new to this mail list format).I have been trying to convert a telecined clip (29.97 fps) to a progressive one (23.976 fps).The clip I am using for test purpose is here: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71351606/TermSample2.mp4 https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71351606/TermSample2.mp4 The sample contains a x.264 video stream and an AAC 2-channel audio stream. I first tried to use -vf pullup, fps=24000/1001: The log is here https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71351606/pullup_fps.log The result was a 23.976 fps clip, showing up as 'progressive' with MediaInfo, but with 2 progressive frames, followed by 2 frames each blending 2 fields (combing). I also tried -vf pullup -r 24000/1001 as some users mentioned that this worked for them:Here is the log: here https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71351606/pullup_rate.log The result was the same: 2 progressive frames followed by 2 blended ones. I then tried -vf fieldmatch,decimate: The log is here https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71351606/fieldmatch_decimate.log Different result here: most of the time, we have 3 progressive + 1 blended frame, but on occasion 2 progressive + 2 blended.I do hope someone knows how to make IVCT work under ffmpeg.Thanks. I think your problem is that your media is not actually 29.97 fps. ffprobe reports 28.97 fps, multiplying that by 4/5 gives 23.76 Try just -vf pullup,fps=23.176 no fps argument. Worked here. -Nick ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Re: [FFmpeg-user] IVTC with pullup filter
On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 4:40 PM, marcjn windbr...@gmail.com wrote: My mistake. I can't believe I did that and overlooked it . Thanks for looking at the sample. The reason for the strange frame rate: I created that clip from a 29.97 fps telecined recording, and to be sure I had a constant 29.97 fps, I wrote -r 29000/1001 instead of 3/1001. I am adding a hopefully 'correct' 29.97 fps TermSample3.mp4 sample here https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71351606/TermSample3.mp4 Now, using -vf pullup,fps=23.177 on the original sample still gives me 2 progressive + 2 blended frames when runnning the command (see log here https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71351606/pullup_fps20.log ) Using -vf pullup,fps=24000/1001 on the new 29.97 fps sample (TermSample3.mp4), I still get the same result (see log here https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/71351606/pullup_fps3.log ) I will look at mkv as well but it seems that my frame rate error doesn't explain the issue at this point. I can't reproduce the error. Leaving off the fps command, I get something that looks fine. Using ffmpeg -i TermSample3.mp4 -vf pullup out.mkv I compare the frames in the original that were not combed, they appear to be identical to the new one. I don't see the problems you are seeing. The only problem is that this produces 24 fps material that claims to be 30 fps. Adding in -r 24000/1001 fixes the 30fps claim. Now the material claims to be 24fps. Only 2 frames are dropped as a result of the -r output option. -vf fieldmatch,decimateproduces material that looks identical to me. Could you double check that the orginal isn't blurred. Those amo belts or whatever he is swinging are blurred in the original because they are moving quickly. -Nick ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Re: [FFmpeg-user] filterstats broadcast legal report
Hi Carles, On Feb 11, 2015, at 1:45 PM, Carles Vila cvi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I'd like to set up a command to find out if a video is broadcast legal. I've tried to understand how signalstats works but I need some help. I tried the examples in the ffmpeg filter documentation, like the one pasted below, but I'd like to customize it to my needs. Ideally It would output a list of frames that do not meet broadcast specs. FWIW, the video is Quicktime wrapped DNxHD. Thank you! $ ffprobe -f lavfi movie=INPUTFILE.mov,signalstats=stat=brng -show_frames ffprobe version 2.4.2 Copyright (c) 2007-2014 the FFmpeg developers built on Oct 28 2014 17:39:46 with Apple LLVM version 5.1 (clang-503.0.40) (based on LLVM 3.4svn) configuration: --prefix=/usr/local/Cellar/ffmpeg/2.4.2 --enable-shared --enable-pthreads --enable-gpl --enable-version3 --enable-nonfree --enable-hardcoded-tables --enable-avresample --enable-vda --cc=clang --host-cflags= --host-ldflags= --enable-libx264 --enable-libfaac --enable-libmp3lame --enable-libxvid --enable-libfreetype --enable-libtheora --enable-libvorbis --enable-libvpx --enable-librtmp --enable-libopencore-amrnb --enable-libopencore-amrwb --enable-libvo-aacenc --enable-libass --enable-ffplay --enable-libspeex --enable-libschroedinger --enable-libfdk-aac --enable-libopus --enable-frei0r --enable-libopenjpeg --extra-cflags='-I/usr/local/Cellar/openjpeg/1.5.1_1/include/openjpeg-1.5 ' libavutil 54. 7.100 / 54. 7.100 libavcodec 56. 1.100 / 56. 1.100 libavformat56. 4.101 / 56. 4.101 libavdevice56. 0.100 / 56. 0.100 libavfilter 5. 1.100 / 5. 1.100 libavresample 2. 1. 0 / 2. 1. 0 libswscale 3. 0.100 / 3. 0.100 libswresample 1. 1.100 / 1. 1.100 libpostproc53. 0.100 / 53. 0.100 Input #0, lavfi, from 'movie=INPUTFILE.mov,signalstats=stat=brng': Duration: N/A, start: 0.00, bitrate: N/A Stream #0:0: Video: rawvideo (Y42B / 0x42323459), yuv422p, 1920x1080 [SAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], 25 tbr, 25 tbn, 25 tbc [FRAME] media_type=video key_frame=1 pkt_pts=0 pkt_pts_time=0.00 pkt_dts=0 pkt_dts_time=0.00 best_effort_timestamp=0 best_effort_timestamp_time=0.00 pkt_duration=1 pkt_duration_time=0.04 pkt_pos=577024 pkt_size=4147200 width=1920 height=1080 pix_fmt=yuv422p sample_aspect_ratio=1:1 pict_type=I coded_picture_number=0 display_picture_number=0 interlaced_frame=0 top_field_first=0 repeat_pict=0 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.YMIN=12 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.YLOW=58 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.YAVG=74.9742 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.YHIGH=84 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.YMAX=241 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.UMIN=36 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.ULOW=145 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.UAVG=150.074 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.UHIGH=158 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.UMAX=166 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.VMIN=47 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.VLOW=98 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.VAVG=106.101 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.VHIGH=112 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.VMAX=174 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.SATMIN=0 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.SATLOW=24 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.SATAVG=32.6906 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.SATHIGH=42 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.SATMAX=99 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.HUEMED=313 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.HUEAVG=308.107 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.YDIF=0 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.UDIF=0 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.VDIF=0 TAG:lavfi.signalstats.BRNG=0.00231144 [/FRAME] This means that 0.00231144% of the frame is outside of broadcast range (Y within 16-235 and U/V within 16-240) which in your file is about 4,793 pixels. I vaguely remember someone referring a broadcast standards document which referred to broadcast legal not considering 100% of pixels to be within that range, but considered broadcast legal to mean somewhat less than 100% of the pixels had to be in the stated ranges. Unfortunately I can't remember what amount of outliers was tolerated or what the spec was. The output of ffprobe -f lavfi movie=INPUTFILE.mov,signalstats=stat=brng -show_entries frame_tags=lavfi.signalstats.BRNG -of flat may be easier to parse in your scenario since the output will include the frame numbers, like frames.frame.567.tags.lavfi_signalstats_BRNG=0 frames.frame.568.tags.lavfi_signalstats_BRNG=0 frames.frame.569.tags.lavfi_signalstats_BRNG=0 then you would need to grep out the lines where BRNG exceed some defined threshold. Hope this helps. Dave Rice ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Re: [FFmpeg-user] IVTC with pullup filter
Nicholas Robbins-2 wrote Using ffmpeg -i TermSample3.mp4 -vf pullup out.mkv I compare the frames in the original that were not combed, they appear to be identical to the new one. I don't see the problems you are seeing. The only problem is that this produces 24 fps material that claims to be 30 fps. Adding in -r 24000/1001 fixes the 30fps claim. Now the material claims to be 24fps. Only 2 frames are dropped as a result of the -r output option. -Nick ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user Now I see the same thing: Gives all progressive frames. Good result. Could'nt see the frame rate with MediaInfo, but has to be 23.976 fps All progressive frames: 4 individual frames + 1 duplicate. 29.97 fps. Just need to eliminate the dupes. All progressive frames, 23.976 fps, the dupes have been dropped. Good result. No idea why the behavior is different for the mp4 container and mkv. Also, I need to find out why works perfectly, while Nicholas Robbins-2 wrote Could you double check that the orginal isn't blurred. Those amo belts or whatever he is swinging are blurred in the original because they are moving quickly. The ammo belts are blurred because of the movement. Now, I need to find out why works well, while still creates 3 progressive + 1 blended. Jean -- View this message in context: http://ffmpeg-users.933282.n4.nabble.com/IVTC-with-pullup-filter-tp4661581p4669251.html Sent from the FFmpeg-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
[FFmpeg-user] Răspuns: Cannot install ffmpeg Solaris
I would still try to solve this riddle, how does the following file look like? /usr/include/sys/brand.h Find attached requested file. (You have to confirm that you ran make distclean) I run gmake distclean... After that ffmpeg compiled fine. Thank you for your suport. If you need more info about the udp bug reply. Thanks În Marţi, 10 Februarie 2015 14:29:59, Carl Eugen Hoyos ceho...@ag.or.at a scris: Dustinta Cristian dst_cristi_16-at-yahoo.ro at ffmpeg.org writes: I attached your requested info. Thank you! I would still try to solve this riddle, how does the following file look like? /usr/include/sys/brand.h Also if you can help me with this issue I'll apreciate : I thought I already did: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.ffmpeg.user/55663/focus=55724 (You have to confirm that you ran make distclean) Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user brand.h Description: Binary data ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Re: [FFmpeg-user] IVTC with pullup filter
Sorry if this is now an old topic, but I am still facing exactly the same issue: pullup is always generating 2 progressive and 2 blended frames, whether I use vf pullup, fps=24000/1001 or -vf pullup -r 24000/1001. I could submit sample and log, but I just would like to know if people think this issue has now been resolved satisfactorily in recent ffmpeg releases (I am using one I installed 2 days ago). -- View this message in context: http://ffmpeg-users.933282.n4.nabble.com/IVTC-with-pullup-filter-tp4661581p4669238.html Sent from the FFmpeg-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Re: [FFmpeg-user] IVTC with pullup filter
On 2/11/15, marcjn windbr...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry if this is now an old topic, but I am still facing exactly the same issue: pullup is always generating 2 progressive and 2 blended frames, whether I use vf pullup, fps=24000/1001 or -vf pullup -r 24000/1001. I could submit sample and log, but I just would like to know if people think this issue has now been resolved satisfactorily in recent ffmpeg releases (I am using one I installed 2 days ago). Did you tried fieldmatch decimate filters? -- View this message in context: http://ffmpeg-users.933282.n4.nabble.com/IVTC-with-pullup-filter-tp4661581p4669238.html Sent from the FFmpeg-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
Re: [FFmpeg-user] IVTC with pullup filter
marcjn windbreiz at gmail.com writes: I could submit sample and log If you don't submit them, help is extremely unlikely afaict. (This is of course not pullup related.) Carl Eugen ___ ffmpeg-user mailing list ffmpeg-user@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-user
