Re: [Finale] MakeMusic CEO John Paulson resigns

2008-11-26 Thread dhbailey
While I have no idea what sort of person John Paulson is nor 
what his role has been as CEO, I would say that all the 
officers share responsibility for any negative aspects of a 
company or that company's products.  They're the ones in 
charge, and they're the ones taking home the biggest 
paychecks.  I've never understood why a company has both a 
president and a CEO, since what I understand a CEO to be 
doing is what I had always thought a president was supposed 
to do. It's that sort of top-heavy management in many 
companies these days which might be the reason for nobody 
ultimately having responsibility for seeing that anything is 
done properly.


If the CEO is really the Chief Executive Officer, what does 
the president do?  Sit around and say Gee, it's good to be 
the president.  or are there responsibilities in the 
day-to-day operation of the company?


Reading such a press release makes it sound as if Paulson 
suddenly got spooked and is jumping ship, but in reality 
there are many reasons he may be leaving, none of which 
would make it into such a terse announcement.  All such an 
announcement really means is that Paulson is resigning. 
Nothing more, nothing less.


I think we simply have to wait and see if the corporate 
culture changes and if any major alterations in the product 
lines or in the way bugs are fixed or not fixed will occur.


Personally, I'd be a lot more spooked if the announcement 
said the entire development team had resigned.  ;-)


David H. Bailey


shirling  neueweise wrote:


is the CEO responsible for these problems you have articulated? has he 
contributed to the improvement or decline of the company or to the 
product (i assume you are referring to finale) in your view?  or is he 
honestly dedicated to the product but bailing ship because of an 
unresolvable pestilence in the development and marketing department that 
will ultimately lead to the downfall of the company?


i don't know, your comments sound a bit simple to me, for a situation 
that is surely fairly complex.


Perhaps the myopic vision that has been prevalent in the company will 
finally be cured? Maybe they will fix bugs, listen to long time users, 
address problems, add features people actually want?


NawI didn't think so either.


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale




--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] MakeMusic CEO John Paulson resigns

2008-11-26 Thread dhbailey
On the other hand, the growth and continued positive actions 
by the Sibelius leadership (even after having been purchased 
by Avid) may only be showing that the only reason Finale was 
the leader was because the only other competition was Score, 
which isn't now and never has been the sort of versatile, 
anybody-with-a-computer-can-use-it program which Finale and 
Sibelius are.  Encore gave it a run for its money for a 
short while, but once that company went belly-up Encore has 
never been anything for Coda/Net-4-Music/MakeMusic to worry 
about.  But once Sibelius arrived on the scene, Finale's 
we're the best philosophy which didn't fully take into 
account that it left off a phrase and should have been 
we're the best because we're the only one hasn't worked as 
a corporate motto.  It should have changed into We're the 
best and we're going to stay the best because we'll define 
the market.


Is that the CEO's responsibility?  Sure, equally shared with 
the president and the chairman of the board and all the 
other directors.  Of course, MakeMusic is such a relatively 
small company, maybe the problem is that there are too many 
directors all trying to have a say in what happens. 
Chairman of the board and president and ceo?  Who's really 
in charge?  Nobody knows, which makes it harder to pin blame 
on anybody and also makes it harder to have any sort of 
unified vision of corporate direction or product development.


It would be interesting to know what the ratio of directors 
and officers to rank-and-file employees is.


David H. Bailey


Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Fairly complex? Not really. Is the CEO responsible for the focus of a 
company? And it's products? And the quality of its products?  If the 
product isn't living up to expectations, you are not going to give a 
free pass to the CEO and blame some employee who is actually coding the 
product. You are going to blame the CEO for allowing the product to be 
shipped out in the first place.


I for one would welcome change within MakeMusic. They have been behind 
the curve (Sibelius) for the last bunch of years, and hopefully new 
leadership will help them become the leader they once were.



shirling  neueweise wrote:


is the CEO responsible for these problems you have articulated? has he 
contributed to the improvement or decline of the company or to the 
product (i assume you are referring to finale) in your view?  or is he 
honestly dedicated to the product but bailing ship because of an 
unresolvable pestilence in the development and marketing department 
that will ultimately lead to the downfall of the company?


i don't know, your comments sound a bit simple to me, for a situation 
that is surely fairly complex.


Perhaps the myopic vision that has been prevalent in the company will 
finally be cured? Maybe they will fix bugs, listen to long time 
users, address problems, add features people actually want?


NawI didn't think so either.


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale




--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] OT

2008-11-26 Thread dhbailey
Copy the pictures to a memory card in a reader attached to 
your computer and then place the memory card in the digital 
photo frame.


David H. Bailey


Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Hmmm ... I would hope that I could access files already in my iPhoto, 
not only ones just created in the camera. Seems like there must be a way ..


Thanks,

Dean

On Nov 25, 2008, at 8:03 PM, Allen Fisher wrote:

With most of them (at least the last time I looked...), you take the 
memory card out of the camera and stick it in the frame.


On Nov 25, 2008, at 3:17 PM, Dean M. Estabrook wrote:

Inre digital picture frames ... I'm totally a tyro on the topic, can 
one of you multi-talented listers let me know how, exactly, does one 
transfer JPEG files from a Mac to such a device?  Directly via USB, 
or via a flash drive up to which such images have been loaded ?   ... 
any favorites in mind?


Thanks,

Dean


Dean M. Estabrook
http://deanestabrook.googlepages.com/home

When I am working on a problem, I never think about beauty. But 
when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it 
is wrong. 


R. Buckminster Fuller






___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Allen Fisher
Founder and Principal Developer
Fisher Art and Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]






___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Dean M. Estabrook
http://deanestabrook.googlepages.com/home

When I am working on a problem, I never think about beauty. But 
when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it 
is wrong. 


R. Buckminster Fuller






___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale




--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale]Multiple time signatures = was Beaming problem

2008-11-26 Thread dhbailey
Speaking as a conductor of a community band, I can tell you 
that if you want more than a couple of collegiate ensembles 
to be interested in your band transcription, don't have that 
sort of multiple-time-signatures-at-once.


My band (and my conducting skills) have no problem with 
switching between various meters as long as the relationship 
is clear to the brain and the ear.  So moving between 3/4, 
4/4 and 5/4 is no problem.  Moving between various x/8 
meters is no problem.  Trying to have some of the band play 
in x/8 while others are playing in x/4 simply won't work for 
any but the most advanced (read that as military or 
collegiate/conservatory) ensembles.  We can handle the 3/4 
vs 6/8 of Holst's Fantasy on the Dargason (final movement of 
the Second Suite in F for Military Band) but in that case 
one measure of one meter equals one measure of the other 
meter so beat 1 always lines up (intellectually and visually 
and aurally).  Anything else will be too complex for 
once-a-week-rehearsal groups to master.


Good luck!
David



Jane Frasier wrote:

   No.
   Here is the other challenge. I am transcribing my piano sonata for band.
   There are sections of this where the left hand is playing a waltz type
   pattern but switching from 3/4 to 5/4 to 4/4, etc. The melody in the right
   hand is written as 6/8, 10/8, 8/8 with various groups of 2 or 3 eighth
   notes. I think this works ok for piano, but what will the conductor do with
   this? I think it should be one of the other but I am not sure which meters
   would be easier to conduct and follow.
   Any ideas?
   Jane
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

A Balkan folk-dance beat, perhaps? :)

ajr



I am using Finale 2008 on Mac, OS 10.5.5.

I want a time signature to say 8/8 but I want it beamed 3+3+2. I created
a composite time signal of 3+3+2/8+8+8 and then a different time
signature 8/8 to display. When I put in the notes all the eighth notes
have separate stems -- no beams. I tried rebeaming according to time
signature and got the same result.

What am I missing?

Thanks so much.

Jane
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[3]http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale




___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[5]http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

References

   1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   2. mailto:Finale@shsu.edu
   3. http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
   4. mailto:Finale@shsu.edu
   5. http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale




--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Hymn Lyrics

2008-11-26 Thread Noel Stoutenburg

noel jones wrote:
I think I have layout and everything under control when doing hymns 
except lyrics.


Multiple verses end up making me manually drag staves around, and I 
end up with a sloppy looking book of hymns. 
I've done several hundreds of hymns, and here's what I did early on. I 
found a spacing between the bottom  of the top staff and the first line 
of lyrics, a spacing between lines of lyrics, and a spacing between the 
last lyric, and the top of the bottom staff that I liked. I set up a 
template file, and with all the settings I prefer, spaced to accommodate 
6 verses. When I do a hymn with more or fewer, I simply set the space 
between the bottom lyric and the top line of the bottom staff as needed.


ns
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale]Multiple time signatures = was Beaming problem

2008-11-26 Thread Christopher Smith

There are a lot of opinions on this, but here is mine.

The time signature should reflect the GROUND beat, not any hemiolas  
or incidental accents that may crop up. The melody is not always the  
best indicator of metre (what would you do with Fascinating Rhythm,  
for example, or any jazz or latin tune that has syncopations AGAINST  
the ground beat?) The tipoff for me in your situation is that you say  
the left hand has very simple rhythms. This is your ground beat, and  
this is what the conducting pattern will be. Let the melody do what  
it needs to do in opposition to the ground beat, using any accents or  
odd beamings that you must to communicate it.


8/8 is not very informative as a time signature, and it should be  
accompanied by a 3+3+2 expression over it or else be actually  
written that way. I am suspicious of 8/8 in general. Why not 4/4 and  
we can just perform the hemiola-type pattern as the parts require,  
either through Q. Q. Q or 3E 3E 2E with contours or accents as required?


10/8 as well does not have any performance practice associated with  
it, and should be written as something more recognisable. Clear and  
quick communication is the strongest argument in these cases, I  
think. Stravinsky rewrote part of the Rite of Spring a few years  
later because of lack of clarity in the original metre changes, and  
even at that he didn't clean it up as much as I think he could have  
(but he was on the cutting edge then, so we can cut him some slack!)


As for how to accomplish this in Finale, you can manually set  
beamings in Speedy with the / key, copy the passage to other staves  
and re-pitch using the Simple Entry repitch tool and hitting the  
notes on your MIDI keyboard. This is the only thing I use Simple  
Entry for, and it is marvelous.


Christopher


On Nov 25, 2008, at 10:31 PM, Jane Frasier wrote:



   No.
   Here is the other challenge. I am transcribing my piano sonata  
for band.
   There are sections of this where the left hand is playing a  
waltz type
   pattern but switching from 3/4 to 5/4 to 4/4, etc. The melody in  
the right
   hand is written as 6/8, 10/8, 8/8 with various groups of 2 or 3  
eighth
   notes. I think this works ok for piano, but what will the  
conductor do with
   this? I think it should be one of the other but I am not sure  
which meters

   would be easier to conduct and follow.
   Any ideas?
   Jane
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

A Balkan folk-dance beat, perhaps? :)

ajr



I am using Finale 2008 on Mac, OS 10.5.5.

I want a time signature to say 8/8 but I want it beamed 3+3+2. I  
created

a composite time signal of 3+3+2/8+8+8 and then a different time
signature 8/8 to display. When I put in the notes all the eighth notes
have separate stems -- no beams. I tried rebeaming according to time
signature and got the same result.

What am I missing?

Thanks so much.

Jane
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[3]http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale




___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[5]http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

References

   1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   2. mailto:Finale@shsu.edu
   3. http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
   4. mailto:Finale@shsu.edu
   5. http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


RE: [Finale] metrical change notation question

2008-11-26 Thread Stu McIntire
No, I should have indicated that I'm on WinFin 2006. Thanks, though -

 Are you using Finale 2009? If that's the case, this is easy to do
 with the Expression Tool:
 
 Choose the Tempo Marks category and click on Create Tempo Mark. In
 the Expression Designer for tempo marks, you'll see insert note on
 a drop-down menu. Just choose the dotted quarter from the menu, type
 the equal sign and choose the quarter from the menu.
 
 Michael
 
 
 On 25 Nov 2008, at 19:58, Stu McIntire wrote:
 
  In a piano piece, at the transition of a 6/8 section to one in 4/4,
  I want
  to put a [dotted quarter note] = [quarter note] indication above
  the staff,
  using the actual notes, obviously, not descriptive text as I did
  here.  Do I
  have to find the symbols in a font and put them in a text box or is
  there an
  easier way?
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale]Multiple time signatures = was Beaming problem

2008-11-26 Thread John Howell
I second David's comments completely, also 
writing from a community band/community orchestra 
viewpoint.  In fact, in the Holst David cites he 
includes careful instructions where to beat 1 to 
a bar (in the superimposed 3/4:6/8 sections) and 
where to go back to 2 to a bar (everything else). 
Interestingly enough, Holst included the same 
movement (not note for note, but VERY close) as 
the last movement of his St. Paul's Suite for 
Strings, which we also played this fall, and it 
has the same instructions.


Our band played the Holst under 2 different 
conductors this fall.  Our own conductor did not 
follow those instructions and beat 2 to a bar 
throughout, while our guest conductor did change 
to follow the instructions (as did a third 
conductor with our community string orchestra). 
Both approaches worked fine, once the players 
understood what was happening.


Jane:  If I read your explanation properly, you 
are writing in such a way that 1 bar still equals 
1 bar, so your problem is with shifting 
subdivisions within each bar, right?  If I were 
writing anything similar, I would probably ask 
that the large-scale beat remain constant (as 
David suggests), and indicate the shifting note 
groupings within each bar through beaming, 
slurring, possibly bracketing if necessary, or 
perhaps even using articulations to define the 
subgroupings.  I would probably NOT use different 
time signatures within a given bar.  Would that 
work in your piece?


But David is completely correct.  Few (if any) 
community bands will attempt the more 
rhythmically-complex Stravinsky, let alone music 
with overlapping or competing time signatures 
that lack a unifying large-scale beat pattern. 
You have to understand that we have community 
musicians who lack advanced training in complex 
music and do their best at a Grade 3 difficulty 
level (and in our case we have some--mostly 
retired engineers, I'm sad to admit--who simply 
can't count rests properly!).  In a collegiate 
wind ensemble restricted to music majors or 
others equally competent, you might actually find 
some whose musicianship is as high as the average 
6th grader in a good Kodály program in Hungary!!!


Just curious, but were you asked to transcribe 
your piece for band by someone who believes that 
it will be playable and effective?  If so, you 
have a great conductor to work with!


John


At 4:21 AM -0500 11/26/08, dhbailey wrote:
Speaking as a conductor of a community band, I 
can tell you that if you want more than a couple 
of collegiate ensembles to be interested in your 
band transcription, don't have that sort of 
multiple-time-signatures-at-once.


My band (and my conducting skills) have no 
problem with switching between various meters as 
long as the relationship is clear to the brain 
and the ear.  So moving between 3/4, 4/4 and 5/4 
is no problem.  Moving between various x/8 
meters is no problem.  Trying to have some of 
the band play in x/8 while others are playing in 
x/4 simply won't work for any but the most 
advanced (read that as military or 
collegiate/conservatory) ensembles.  We can 
handle the 3/4 vs 6/8 of Holst's Fantasy on the 
Dargason (final movement of the Second Suite in 
F for Military Band) but in that case one 
measure of one meter equals one measure of the 
other meter so beat 1 always lines up 
(intellectually and visually and aurally). 
Anything else will be too complex for 
once-a-week-rehearsal groups to master.


Good luck!
David



Jane Frasier wrote:

   No.
   Here is the other challenge. I am transcribing my piano sonata for band.
   There are sections of this where the left hand is playing a waltz type
   pattern but switching from 3/4 to 5/4 to 4/4, etc. The melody in the right
   hand is written as 6/8, 10/8, 8/8 with various groups of 2 or 3 eighth
   notes. I think this works ok for piano, but 
what will the conductor do with

   this? I think it should be one of the other but I am not sure which meters
   would be easier to conduct and follow.
   Any ideas?
   Jane
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

A Balkan folk-dance beat, perhaps? :)

ajr



I am using Finale 2008 on Mac, OS 10.5.5.

I want a time signature to say 8/8 but I want it beamed 3+3+2. I created
a composite time signal of 3+3+2/8+8+8 and then a different time
signature 8/8 to display. When I put in the notes all the eighth notes
have separate stems -- no beams. I tried rebeaming according to time
signature and got the same result.

What am I missing?

Thanks so much.

Jane
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[3]http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale




___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[5]http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

References

   1. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   2. mailto:Finale@shsu.edu
   3. http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
   4. mailto:Finale@shsu.edu
   5. http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Re: [Finale]Multiple time signatures = was Beaming problem

2008-11-26 Thread Jane Frasier
Thanks for all the advise. I think I will just use the 3/4, 4/5, etc. 
time and beam and use slurs and accents to get the rhythmic sense of the 
melody.


I am the one that wanted to transcribe it. It was performed on piano on 
my graduate recital by an incredible pianist and composer and her 
comment after the performance was It isn't very pianistic so I thought 
perhaps it would work for band. As I get more into it I think I disagree 
and I am not sure how it will work. I might abandon it. I did finish the 
slow movement and it is easy. I'll bet your community bands could play 
it. I knew before I started that the first and last movements would only 
be appropriate for a college band or a semi-professional group.


I am wondering if any of you community band conductors would be 
interested in playing an arrangement I did of a traditional folk song. 
Email me if you are interested.


Thanks.

Jane

John Howell wrote:
I second David's comments completely, also writing from a community 
band/community orchestra viewpoint.  In fact, in the Holst David cites 
he includes careful instructions where to beat 1 to a bar (in the 
superimposed 3/4:6/8 sections) and where to go back to 2 to a bar 
(everything else). Interestingly enough, Holst included the same 
movement (not note for note, but VERY close) as the last movement of 
his St. Paul's Suite for Strings, which we also played this fall, and 
it has the same instructions.


Our band played the Holst under 2 different conductors this fall.  Our 
own conductor did not follow those instructions and beat 2 to a bar 
throughout, while our guest conductor did change to follow the 
instructions (as did a third conductor with our community string 
orchestra). Both approaches worked fine, once the players understood 
what was happening.


Jane:  If I read your explanation properly, you are writing in such a 
way that 1 bar still equals 1 bar, so your problem is with shifting 
subdivisions within each bar, right?  If I were writing anything 
similar, I would probably ask that the large-scale beat remain 
constant (as David suggests), and indicate the shifting note groupings 
within each bar through beaming, slurring, possibly bracketing if 
necessary, or perhaps even using articulations to define the 
subgroupings.  I would probably NOT use different time signatures 
within a given bar.  Would that work in your piece?


But David is completely correct.  Few (if any) community bands will 
attempt the more rhythmically-complex Stravinsky, let alone music with 
overlapping or competing time signatures that lack a unifying 
large-scale beat pattern. You have to understand that we have 
community musicians who lack advanced training in complex music and do 
their best at a Grade 3 difficulty level (and in our case we have 
some--mostly retired engineers, I'm sad to admit--who simply can't 
count rests properly!).  In a collegiate wind ensemble restricted to 
music majors or others equally competent, you might actually find some 
whose musicianship is as high as the average 6th grader in a good 
Kodály program in Hungary!!!


Just curious, but were you asked to transcribe your piece for band by 
someone who believes that it will be playable and effective?  If so, 
you have a great conductor to work with!


John


At 4:21 AM -0500 11/26/08, dhbailey wrote:
Speaking as a conductor of a community band, I can tell you that if 
you want more than a couple of collegiate ensembles to be interested 
in your band transcription, don't have that sort of 
multiple-time-signatures-at-once.


My band (and my conducting skills) have no problem with switching 
between various meters as long as the relationship is clear to the 
brain and the ear.  So moving between 3/4, 4/4 and 5/4 is no 
problem.  Moving between various x/8 meters is no problem.  Trying to 
have some of the band play in x/8 while others are playing in x/4 
simply won't work for any but the most advanced (read that as 
military or collegiate/conservatory) ensembles.  We can handle the 
3/4 vs 6/8 of Holst's Fantasy on the Dargason (final movement of the 
Second Suite in F for Military Band) but in that case one measure of 
one meter equals one measure of the other meter so beat 1 always 
lines up (intellectually and visually and aurally). Anything else 
will be too complex for once-a-week-rehearsal groups to master.


Good luck!
David



Jane Frasier wrote:

   No.
   Here is the other challenge. I am transcribing my piano sonata 
for band.
   There are sections of this where the left hand is playing a waltz 
type
   pattern but switching from 3/4 to 5/4 to 4/4, etc. The melody in 
the right
   hand is written as 6/8, 10/8, 8/8 with various groups of 2 or 3 
eighth
   notes. I think this works ok for piano, but what will the 
conductor do with
   this? I think it should be one of the other but I am not sure 
which meters

   would be easier to conduct and follow.
   Any ideas?
   Jane
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

A Balkan 

Re: [Finale] OT

2008-11-26 Thread Dean M. Estabrook
OK ... Thanks gentlemen.  I already use a flash drive with my Mac for  
backing up files, so it sounds as if the whole thing is workable.


Thanks again for the input ...

Dean

On Nov 25, 2008, at 10:21 PM, Dick Hauser wrote:



On Nov 25, 2008, at 9:58 PM, Richard Yates wrote:


I don't know Mac, but in Windows the camera chip that you read in the
computer is just another memory device to which you can save  
files. Files
from any source can be saved to the chip and the chip then plugged  
into the

frame.


Right, same on the Mac.  So if the frame uses a flash card, you  
need to mount it on the computer in some way.  The computer needs  
to have some kind of card reader interface.  Might be a camera,  
printer, could be one of those usb flash drives.  Then its just a  
drag and drop thing.   Look for flash drive on Amazon and other  
places like it.  I bought one for about $10 and used an extra card  
from a camera.  It mounts just like a one gig drive via a usb port.




___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Dean M. Estabrook
http://deanestabrook.googlepages.com/home

When I am working on a problem, I never think about beauty. But  
when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know  
it is wrong. 


R. Buckminster Fuller






___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] MakeMusic CEO John Paulson resigns

2008-11-26 Thread Tyler Turner



--- On Wed, 11/26/08, dhbailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 While I have no idea what sort of person John Paulson is nor
 what his role has been as CEO.

He invented Finale and SmartMusic and made them both successful. He's an 
outstanding musician/composer, a strong leader and a great person to know.


  
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] MakeMusic CEO John Paulson resigns

2008-11-26 Thread David W. Fenton
On 26 Nov 2008 at 11:12, Tyler Turner wrote:

 --- On Wed, 11/26/08, dhbailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  While I have no idea what sort of person John Paulson is nor
  what his role has been as CEO.
 
 He invented Finale and SmartMusic and made them both successful. He's
 an outstanding musician/composer, a strong leader and a great person
 to know. 

Um, Phil Farrand had something to do with the invention of Finale, I 
think.

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://dfenton.com
David Fenton Associates   http://dfenton.com/DFA/

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] MakeMusic CEO John Paulson resigns

2008-11-26 Thread Eric Fiedler

Didn't Phil Farrand invent Finale sometime back in the late Middle Ages?
But as far as making it _successful_ you may be right ... ;-)
eff

Habsburger Verlag Frankfurt (Dr. Fiedler)
www.habsburgerverlag.de
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



On 26.11.2008, at 20:12, Tyler Turner wrote:





--- On Wed, 11/26/08, dhbailey  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



While I have no idea what sort of person John Paulson is nor
what his role has been as CEO.


He invented Finale and SmartMusic and made them both successful.  
He's an outstanding musician/composer, a strong leader and a great  
person to know.




___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] MakeMusic CEO John Paulson resigns

2008-11-26 Thread Fiskum, Steve
Well yes but that isn't his most noted achievement per Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Farrand

Phil Farrand (born November 5, 1958) is an American computer programmer,
webmaster and author. He is best known for his Nitpicker's Guides, in which
he nitpicks plot holes and continuity errors in the various Star Trek
television programs and movies, and for the creation of Nitcentral, a
website devoted to the same activity.

It's hard to believe that this is the main paragraph in Wikipedia. Although
I love the true geekiness of it all.

Steve


11/26/08 2:06 PM, Eric Fiedler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Didn't Phil Farrand invent Finale sometime back in the late Middle Ages?
 But as far as making it _successful_ you may be right ... ;-)
 eff
 
 Habsburger Verlag Frankfurt (Dr. Fiedler)
 www.habsburgerverlag.de
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 On 26.11.2008, at 20:12, Tyler Turner wrote:
 
 
 
 
 --- On Wed, 11/26/08, dhbailey
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 While I have no idea what sort of person John Paulson is nor
 what his role has been as CEO.
 
 He invented Finale and SmartMusic and made them both successful.
 He's an outstanding musician/composer, a strong leader and a great
 person to know.
 
 
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] MakeMusic CEO John Paulson resigns

2008-11-26 Thread Tyler Turner
I stand corrected. John invented SmartMusic, but not Finale. He is however, as 
you suggest, the person perhaps most directly responsible for its success and 
its movement towards becoming a viable solution for publishers.

Tyler

--- On Wed, 11/26/08, Eric Fiedler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 From: Eric Fiedler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Finale] MakeMusic CEO John Paulson resigns
 To: finale@shsu.edu
 Date: Wednesday, November 26, 2008, 2:06 PM
 Didn't Phil Farrand invent Finale sometime back in the
 late Middle Ages?
 But as far as making it _successful_ you may be right ...
 ;-)
 eff
 
 Habsburger Verlag Frankfurt (Dr. Fiedler)
 www.habsburgerverlag.de
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 
 On 26.11.2008, at 20:12, Tyler Turner wrote:
 
  
  
  
  --- On Wed, 11/26/08, dhbailey
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
  While I have no idea what sort of person John
 Paulson is nor
  what his role has been as CEO.
  
  He invented Finale and SmartMusic and made them both
 successful. He's an outstanding musician/composer, a
 strong leader and a great person to know.
  
  
  
  ___
  Finale mailing list
  Finale@shsu.edu
  http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
 
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


  
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale