[Finale] IExplorer

2005-03-03 Thread Phil Daley
For those of you skeptics that suggested that IE wouldn't be upgraded until 
LongHorn.

http://www.informationweek.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=60403301

Phil Daley   AutoDesk 
http://www.conknet.com/~p_daley

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] IExplorer

2005-03-03 Thread David W. Fenton
On 3 Mar 2005 at 12:41, Phil Daley wrote:

 For those of you skeptics that suggested that IE wouldn't be upgraded
 until LongHorn.
 
 http://www.informationweek.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=60403301

Catching up on the news of two weeks ago?

The reason we said IE wouldn't be updated was BECAUSE MICROSOFT HAD 
EXPLICITLY SAID EXACTLY THAT ON A NUMBER OF OCCASIONS.

The announcement of IE7 was a big deal precisely because it was a 
high-profile reversal of a previous policy that Microsoft had 
trumpeted quite widely.

Of course, the discussion on this list about updating IE was about IE 
*Mac*, and IE7 is *not* going to be created for any OS but WinXP and 
Win2K3 Server. They do not plan to create a version for Win2K nor for 
the Mac.

So, the situation is pretty much exactly as it was before in regard 
to the subject in question, the updating of the Mac version of IE.

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://www.bway.net/~dfenton
David Fenton Associateshttp://www.bway.net/~dfassoc

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale