Re: [Finale] Notes EVERYWHERE

2005-10-24 Thread dhbailey

David W. Fenton wrote:


On 22 Oct 2005 at 20:58, Darcy James Argue wrote:


If you need to manually remove system locks, you can do that in the 
Mass Edit tool, by pressing cmd-A (or on Windows, ctrl-A) for Select 
All, and then cmd-U (or, I think, ctrl-U on Windows) to unlock all 
systems. Then you can manually lock only the systems you need locked.



On Windows, unlocking systems is U by itself, whereas Ctrl-U is the 
Update Layout command.




Then there's ctrl-shift-u which not only updates the layout but it also 
unlocks all systems and can totally ruin carefully worked out sections 
if used haphazardly.


I try not to actually lock systems until I'm nearing the end of the 
layout, where I'm working out page turns and don't want the systems to 
be unlocked again.




--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Notes EVERYWHERE

2005-10-23 Thread Johannes Gebauer

On 23.10.2005 Chuck Israels wrote:
I find no disadvantage to having Automatic Update Layout and  
Automatic Spacing turned on all the time.  Perhaps some others may  
be able to describe circumstances in which it is better to have them  
off, but I have yet to run into any.


I always have automatic update layout on and see no disadvantages at 
all, since you will have to update the layout eventually, anyway. 
Otherwise, if you save and quit Finale, then reopen your file you may 
find it doesn't look the same anymore, and also occasionally measures 
get lost if you don't update the layout. (The only disadvantage I can 
see is that it may take more time on a slow machine working on large 
files with many pages, but I never noticed that as a problem).


Automatic music spacing is a different matter. I always have it off, as 
I don't want it to destroy manually spaced notes accidentally. This will 
happen, if for instance you have multiple layers with multiple 
accidentals where quite often automatic spacing is insufficient. I often 
have to give extra space using TGTools, or manually move one note in a 
measure in more than 2 layers. With automatic music spacing (which kicks 
in when you leave a measure in speedy) such work is easily lost.


Johannes

--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Notes EVERYWHERE

2005-10-23 Thread David W. Fenton
On 22 Oct 2005 at 20:58, Darcy James Argue wrote:

 If you need to manually remove system locks, you can do that in the 
 Mass Edit tool, by pressing cmd-A (or on Windows, ctrl-A) for Select 
 All, and then cmd-U (or, I think, ctrl-U on Windows) to unlock all 
 systems. Then you can manually lock only the systems you need locked.

On Windows, unlocking systems is U by itself, whereas Ctrl-U is the 
Update Layout command.

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://www.bway.net/~dfenton
David Fenton Associateshttp://www.bway.net/~dfassoc

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Notes EVERYWHERE

2005-10-23 Thread Mark D Lew

On Oct 22, 2005, at 6:32 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:

Nothing needs to bounces around with Automatic Update Layout on, so 
long as you choose the appropriate Update Layout settings for your 
work (like, for instance, Reflow only within systems).  The 
advantage to leaving Update Layout on is that you are never caught 
looking at measure widths in Page View that are not the real measure 
widths because you haven't updated the layout yet, and you never 
inadvertently print a part with an entire system missing. I still 
don't really see any disadvantage, unless you have a very slow 
computer.


It could be that I'm blurring Automatic Update Layout and Automatic 
Music Spacing in my mind.  AMS definitely bounces stuff around.


Perhaps the only real advantage for me to leaving AUL off is that I'm 
used to it that way and I'm an old curmudgeon who likes things to stay 
the same -- which was my primary point in the other post, anyway.  I've 
never suffered from any of the problems the rest of you describe -- 
checking and updating layout is so much a part of my process that I 
can't imagine accidentally printing a part with the measure spaced 
wrong, much less losing a system -- so I see no reason to start using 
AUL.


I agree that having Automatic Update Layout set by default makes 
perfect sense, but I'm going to gripe if someone deprives me of my 
option to turn it off.  (And ditto for Automatic Music Spacing, Smart 
Word Extensions, etc.)


mdl

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Notes EVERYWHERE

2005-10-22 Thread dhbailey

bill wrote:


Hi gang,

Chuck got it right concerning Update Layout (command-\ on a Mac).  
Being a casual lurker, I must admit that this forum is the best I've 
seen, and those who read the postings here are being given first class 
advice for free.  Bravo!


However, after listening to you all, I am even more leery of 2k6.  I'm 
still on 2k5 and the Update Layout issue should not be an issue since it 
was never a problem since Fin 98 (ish) up until recently.  This is only 
one of many that MM doesn't seem to want to fix or even recognize.  It 
makes me wonder who does their beta-testing.


I am wondering of this group here might band together and lobby to have 
MM spend the paltry 1% of their development resources to get it right 
for us and be done with it.  Or, possibly, encourage them to release a 
Finale Pro version without the stupid garbage they've concentrated on in 
the past few versions.  I'm getting really frustrated with MM, as I'm 
sure most of you are too.  Would it make any sense to compile a master 
wish list and present it to MM as a group?  Sorry to vent...




MM's main focus is to keep on building their market, which means new 
customers as well as keeping continuing customers.  They make far more 
on new sales than upgrades, since we all get the same product but the 
new users pay a lot more for it.


And that means adding more headline-worthy bells and whistles. 
Everybody was so ga-ga over the GPO and how it is integrated into Finale 
that I think a lot of beta-testers must have concentrated on that aspect 
of the program and failed to put it through the normally rigorous testing.


The developers know what's wrong with the program, what bugs are 
longstanding, which annoyances have been there for years, but they don't 
drive what happens with the program.  And this upgrade every year at 
the same time schedule is wreaking havoc with the developers' ability 
to tackle long-standing bugs, since the new features have to at least 
appear to work (has anybody gotten micnotator to work for anything more 
than simple melodies?) so the marketing department can push them at 
trade shows and out in the trenches and in advertising.


Many of us who have been using the program for a long time (I've been 
using it for around 12 years) have sent in lots of bug-fix requests, 
lots of improvement suggestions, and only some of them have gotten any 
attention.


One thing to keep in mind, and this has become obvious every recent 
release -- new code sometimes makes old bugs which have been 
successfully squashed raise their ugly heads again and need to be beaten 
down again in an interim update patch.


Which is long overdue now, and will still probably not resolve all these 
issues.


--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Notes EVERYWHERE

2005-10-22 Thread David W. Fenton
On 21 Oct 2005 at 22:40, bill wrote:

 
 On Oct 21, 2005, at 7:52 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
 
  On 21 Oct 2005 at 18:09, bill wrote:
 
  I'm
  still on 2k5 and the Update Layout issue should not be an issue
  since it was never a problem since Fin 98 (ish) up until recently. 
  This is only one of many that MM doesn't seem to want to fix or
  even recognize.
 
  I'm not understanding your point.
 
  Are you saying that updating the layout *doesn't* update it?
 
  Or that it isn't updating it properly?
 
  Or simply that you believe you shouldn't have to tell Finale to
  update the layout (which you don't, if you turn on automatic layout
  update)?
 
  What exactly is the issue that MakeMusic has not fixed? I don't see
  one here -- all I see is a program design issue that trips up some
  people for about 5 minutes until they realize that they have to do
  something to get the layout updated.
 
 I feel really stupid:  My Automatic Update in 2k5 upgrade was
 unchecked after many years of assuming that upgrading to the next
 invaluable version of Finale would preserve previous and relevant
 settings.

I would agree that an upgrade should not change settings that exist 
in both the older and newer versions.

 However, I *do* have major problems with the direction that MM is
 going, and I feel that you are ignoring and dismissing my sentiments
 with that.  Even though I was incorrect in my last assertion, the
 issue with layout update should *never* occur, and that option should
 never be available, given the results rendered without it.

Well, I definitely disagree with that. I certainly think, as I just 
said, that it's a bug (or a poorly designed feature) that changes 
settings when you upgrade over top of an existing installation, but I 
would *not* want to use a Finale that lacked the ability to turn off 
automatic layout update -- I much prefer to do that myself, and it 
has never been an issue for me in any version of Finale since the 
very early ones (I started with Finale 2.01 in 1991).

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://www.bway.net/~dfenton
David Fenton Associateshttp://www.bway.net/~dfassoc

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Notes EVERYWHERE

2005-10-22 Thread Brennon Bortz
On 10/21/05 10:24 PM, Noel Stoutenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Brennon Bortz wrote:
 
 After opening a new default document and entering notes in Speedy Entry in
 Scroll View, I switch to Page View and suddenly notes have veered off the
 edges of the page on nearly every staff.  Applying any time of music spacing
 only worsens the problem?  Redrawing the screen doesn't fix the problem
 either.  Staff optimization does.  Is optimization the ONLY way to correct
 this?
 
 Sounds like what I had early on, too.  Turned out my problem was too
 many measures per system.  There are a couple ways to solve the
 problem.  One way is to select page view (if you're not already in that
 view mode), then select the mass mover tool, click on the first measure
 of one system, and the first measure of the next system, and respace.
 Another way, also in page view, with the mass mover tool selected, is to
 click on a measure in the middle of the sytem while and press the down
 arrow key.  You might check too, that the reflow measures across
 systems is enabled.  Finally, in page view, select the measure tool,
 select the measures as described earlier in this paragraph, and in the
 measure tool either set the measure width to a smaller value, or
 subtract some quantity form the width of each measure.
 
 ns
 ___
 Finale mailing list
 Finale@shsu.edu
 http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Well, I'm going to have to pick myself up off the floor and rewrite some
material to replicate this problem.  In the meantime, I can tell you that
Reflow Measures Across Systems (Maintain System Locks) is selected, but
Automatic Update Layout is not.  All the emails I've read have me
thoroughly confused...should this be checked or not?  What are the
disadvantages, if any, of checking this?

Thanks again,
Brennon
-- 
B. Christopher Bortz
Graduate Student, Music Composition
University of California, Riverside
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Notes EVERYWHERE

2005-10-22 Thread Chuck Israels

Brennon,

You'll figure this out pretty quickly.

You might want to turn off Maintain System Locks unless you have  
already done some page layout work that you don't want to lose.  In  
my case, I save this part of my work until I have the whole piece  
done in scroll view.  (That's just the way I do things, and you may  
want to work differently, but my way of experiencing music makes  
scroll view a natural way to visualize music.)  I find no advantage  
in setting up system locks until I am working in page view to set up  
the final look of the score (or parts).  Sometimes, when setting up a  
coda section, for instance, you may want to go in to the Measure  
Attributes dialog and select begin a new staff system.  This can be  
done in scroll view and will behave predictably when you switch to  
page view.


I find no disadvantage to having Automatic Update Layout and  
Automatic Spacing turned on all the time.  Perhaps some others may  
be able to describe circumstances in which it is better to have them  
off, but I have yet to run into any.


Chuck




On Oct 22, 2005, at 4:17 PM, Brennon Bortz wrote:


On 10/21/05 10:24 PM, Noel Stoutenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Brennon Bortz wrote:


After opening a new default document and entering notes in Speedy  
Entry in
Scroll View, I switch to Page View and suddenly notes have veered  
off the
edges of the page on nearly every staff.  Applying any time of  
music spacing
only worsens the problem?  Redrawing the screen doesn't fix the  
problem
either.  Staff optimization does.  Is optimization the ONLY way  
to correct

this?



Sounds like what I had early on, too.  Turned out my problem was too
many measures per system.  There are a couple ways to solve the
problem.  One way is to select page view (if you're not already in  
that
view mode), then select the mass mover tool, click on the first  
measure

of one system, and the first measure of the next system, and respace.
Another way, also in page view, with the mass mover tool selected,  
is to
click on a measure in the middle of the sytem while and press the  
down

arrow key.  You might check too, that the reflow measures across
systems is enabled.  Finally, in page view, select the measure tool,
select the measures as described earlier in this paragraph, and in  
the

measure tool either set the measure width to a smaller value, or
subtract some quantity form the width of each measure.

ns
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



Well, I'm going to have to pick myself up off the floor and rewrite  
some
material to replicate this problem.  In the meantime, I can tell  
you that
Reflow Measures Across Systems (Maintain System Locks) is  
selected, but

Automatic Update Layout is not.  All the emails I've read have me
thoroughly confused...should this be checked or not?  What are the
disadvantages, if any, of checking this?

Thanks again,
Brennon
--
B. Christopher Bortz
Graduate Student, Music Composition
University of California, Riverside
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



Chuck Israels
230 North Garden Terrace
Bellingham, WA 98225-5836
phone (360) 671-3402
fax (360) 676-6055
www.chuckisraels.com

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Notes EVERYWHERE

2005-10-22 Thread Darcy James Argue


On 22 Oct 2005, at 7:17 PM, Brennon Bortz wrote:


In the meantime, I can tell you that
Reflow Measures Across Systems (Maintain System Locks) is  
selected, but

Automatic Update Layout is not.  All the emails I've read have me
thoroughly confused...should this be checked or not?


Checked.


What are the
disadvantages, if any, of checking this?


If you have a very slow computer, Finale may become slightly more  
sluggish. But it's really not an issue on any computer with a 1 GHz  
processor or faster.


- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://homepage.mac.com/djargon
Brooklyn, NY


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Notes EVERYWHERE

2005-10-22 Thread Noel Stoutenburg

Brennon Bortz wrote:


In the meantime, I can tell you that Reflow Measures Across Systems (Maintain 
System Locks) is selected,

OK.  Check to see if there is an option for reflow measures across 
systems, (remove system locks):, and try that instead.  Truth to tell, 
at first I though that it seemed oxymoronic to reflow across systems and 
maintain locks, but then I realized that is possible to lock only some 
systems, and not others.


ns

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Notes EVERYWHERE

2005-10-22 Thread Mark D Lew


On Oct 22, 2005, at 5:37 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:


What are the
disadvantages, if any, of checking this?


If you have a very slow computer, Finale may become slightly more 
sluggish. But it's really not an issue on any computer with a 1 GHz 
processor or faster.


It's not only about speed.  Some of us simply prefer to have things 
hold still when we're working on them and not bounce themselves around 
until we ask them, too.  You can call us old-fashioned, or control 
freaks, or whatever, but it's how we prefer to work.


mdl

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Notes EVERYWHERE

2005-10-22 Thread Darcy James Argue

Hi Mark,

Nothing needs to bounces around with Automatic Update Layout on, so  
long as you choose the appropriate Update Layout settings for your  
work (like, for instance, Reflow only within systems).  The  
advantage to leaving Update Layout on is that you are never caught  
looking at measure widths in Page View that are not the real  
measure widths because you haven't updated the layout yet, and you  
never inadvertently print a part with an entire system missing. I  
still don't really see any disadvantage, unless you have a very slow  
computer.


- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://homepage.mac.com/djargon
Brooklyn, NY



On 22 Oct 2005, at 9:20 PM, Mark D Lew wrote:



On Oct 22, 2005, at 5:37 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:



What are the
disadvantages, if any, of checking this?



If you have a very slow computer, Finale may become slightly more  
sluggish. But it's really not an issue on any computer with a 1  
GHz processor or faster.




It's not only about speed.  Some of us simply prefer to have things  
hold still when we're working on them and not bounce themselves  
around until we ask them, too.  You can call us old-fashioned, or  
control freaks, or whatever, but it's how we prefer to work.


mdl

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


[Finale] Notes EVERYWHERE

2005-10-21 Thread Brennon Bortz
After opening a new default document and entering notes in Speedy Entry in
Scroll View, I switch to Page View and suddenly notes have veered off the
edges of the page on nearly every staff.  Applying any time of music spacing
only worsens the problem?  Redrawing the screen doesn't fix the problem
either.  Staff optimization does.  Is optimization the ONLY way to correct
this?

Thanks,
Brennon Bortz
-- 
Brennon Bortz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Notes EVERYWHERE

2005-10-21 Thread Chuck Israels
Is this an update layout problem?  Try going to the edit menu and  
choosing Update Layout, and see if that cures the problem.  If you  
like, you can select Automatic Update Layout further down in the  
edit menu, and Finale will take care of this in the background.  I  
have found no disadvantage to this in my work, though some others  
prefer to do this only when they want it to happen.


Hope this helps.

Chuck


On Oct 21, 2005, at 4:49 PM, Brennon Bortz wrote:

After opening a new default document and entering notes in Speedy  
Entry in
Scroll View, I switch to Page View and suddenly notes have veered  
off the
edges of the page on nearly every staff.  Applying any time of  
music spacing
only worsens the problem?  Redrawing the screen doesn't fix the  
problem
either.  Staff optimization does.  Is optimization the ONLY way to  
correct

this?

Thanks,
Brennon Bortz
--
Brennon Bortz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



Chuck Israels
230 North Garden Terrace
Bellingham, WA 98225-5836
phone (360) 671-3402
fax (360) 676-6055
www.chuckisraels.com

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Notes EVERYWHERE

2005-10-21 Thread Brad Beyenhof
On 21/10/05, Brennon Bortz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 After opening a new default document and entering notes in Speedy Entry in
 Scroll View, I switch to Page View and suddenly notes have veered off the
 edges of the page on nearly every staff.  Applying any time of music
 spacing only worsens the problem?  Redrawing the screen doesn't fix the
 problem either.  Staff optimization does.  Is optimization the ONLY way to
 correct this?

No... when you change music spacing, the next thing to do is always to
update the layout (cmd-\ on Mac, ctrl-u on Win). If you turn on
Automatic Update Layout, manually updating won't be necessary as often
(but it's a good idea to do this fairly frequently when you're working
in Scroll View).

Also, remember that updating the layout only affects the the pages
from the one you're currently viewing through the end of the piece.
Make sure to update layout while viewing Page 1 before printing the
file.

--
Brad Beyenhof
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://augmentedfourth.blogspot.com
Silence will save me from being wrong (and foolish), but it will also
deprive me of the possibility of being right.   ~ Igor Stravinsky

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Notes EVERYWHERE

2005-10-21 Thread bill

Hi gang,

Chuck got it right concerning Update Layout (command-\ on a Mac).  
Being a casual lurker, I must admit that this forum is the best I've 
seen, and those who read the postings here are being given first class 
advice for free.  Bravo!


However, after listening to you all, I am even more leery of 2k6.  I'm 
still on 2k5 and the Update Layout issue should not be an issue since 
it was never a problem since Fin 98 (ish) up until recently.  This is 
only one of many that MM doesn't seem to want to fix or even recognize. 
 It makes me wonder who does their beta-testing.


I am wondering of this group here might band together and lobby to have 
MM spend the paltry 1% of their development resources to get it right 
for us and be done with it.  Or, possibly, encourage them to release a 
Finale Pro version without the stupid garbage they've concentrated on 
in the past few versions.  I'm getting really frustrated with MM, as 
I'm sure most of you are too.  Would it make any sense to compile a 
master wish list and present it to MM as a group?  Sorry to vent...


Bill Duncan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.gwmp.com


On Oct 21, 2005, at 4:49 PM, Brennon Bortz wrote:

After opening a new default document and entering notes in Speedy 
Entry in
Scroll View, I switch to Page View and suddenly notes have veered off 
the
edges of the page on nearly every staff.  Applying any time of music 
spacing

only worsens the problem?  Redrawing the screen doesn't fix the problem
either.  Staff optimization does.  Is optimization the ONLY way to 
correct

this?

Thanks,
Brennon Bortz
--
Brennon Bortz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale



___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Notes EVERYWHERE

2005-10-21 Thread David W. Fenton
On 21 Oct 2005 at 18:09, bill wrote:

 I'm 
 still on 2k5 and the Update Layout issue should not be an issue since
 it was never a problem since Fin 98 (ish) up until recently.  This is
 only one of many that MM doesn't seem to want to fix or even
 recognize. 

I'm not understanding your point.

Are you saying that updating the layout *doesn't* update it?

Or that it isn't updating it properly?

Or simply that you believe you shouldn't have to tell Finale to 
update the layout (which you don't, if you turn on automatic layout 
update)?

What exactly is the issue that MakeMusic has not fixed? I don't see 
one here -- all I see is a program design issue that trips up some 
people for about 5 minutes until they realize that they have to do 
something to get the layout updated.

-- 
David W. Fentonhttp://www.bway.net/~dfenton
David Fenton Associateshttp://www.bway.net/~dfassoc

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Notes EVERYWHERE

2005-10-21 Thread Noel Stoutenburg

Brennon Bortz wrote:


After opening a new default document and entering notes in Speedy Entry in
Scroll View, I switch to Page View and suddenly notes have veered off the
edges of the page on nearly every staff.  Applying any time of music spacing
only worsens the problem?  Redrawing the screen doesn't fix the problem
either.  Staff optimization does.  Is optimization the ONLY way to correct
this?

Sounds like what I had early on, too.  Turned out my problem was too 
many measures per system.  There are a couple ways to solve the 
problem.  One way is to select page view (if you're not already in that 
view mode), then select the mass mover tool, click on the first measure 
of one system, and the first measure of the next system, and respace.  
Another way, also in page view, with the mass mover tool selected, is to 
click on a measure in the middle of the sytem while and press the down 
arrow key.  You might check too, that the reflow measures across 
systems is enabled.  Finally, in page view, select the measure tool, 
select the measures as described earlier in this paragraph, and in the 
measure tool either set the measure width to a smaller value, or 
subtract some quantity form the width of each measure.


ns
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale


Re: [Finale] Notes EVERYWHERE

2005-10-21 Thread bill


On Oct 21, 2005, at 7:52 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:


On 21 Oct 2005 at 18:09, bill wrote:


I'm
still on 2k5 and the Update Layout issue should not be an issue since
it was never a problem since Fin 98 (ish) up until recently.  This is
only one of many that MM doesn't seem to want to fix or even
recognize.


I'm not understanding your point.

Are you saying that updating the layout *doesn't* update it?

Or that it isn't updating it properly?

Or simply that you believe you shouldn't have to tell Finale to
update the layout (which you don't, if you turn on automatic layout
update)?

What exactly is the issue that MakeMusic has not fixed? I don't see
one here -- all I see is a program design issue that trips up some
people for about 5 minutes until they realize that they have to do
something to get the layout updated.

--
David W. Fentonhttp://www.bway.net/~dfenton
David Fenton Associateshttp://www.bway.net/~dfassoc



I feel really stupid:  My Automatic Update in 2k5 upgrade was unchecked 
after many years of assuming that upgrading to the next invaluable 
version of Finale would preserve previous and relevant settings.


However, I *do* have major problems with the direction that MM is 
going, and I feel that you are ignoring and dismissing my sentiments 
with that.  Even though I was incorrect in my last assertion, the issue 
with layout update should *never* occur, and that option should never 
be available, given the results rendered without it.


I am happy to debate you.  You decide whether or not you want to debate 
here in the open or privately, or not at all.  That's up to you.


I have owned my copy of Finale from the very beginning (very low 
3-digit serial # back when putting a staccato on a note took more than 
10 menu selections).  I can be brainless sometimes, as in this case I 
admit, but I am not stupid, and I am trying to find some way to coerce 
MM to spend 10 minutes and fix a long list of problems that they have 
continued to ignore for years.


The most obvious now it the new Text Expression Editor, which looks 
wonderful on the surface (and should have been done 10 years ago), but 
their extremely poor concept of dealing with text still remains, and 
some of the features are lost or poorly done...including baseline shift 
not behaving in the editor window as it does on the page, and, from 
what I hear, line spacing not working in 2k6 at all.


I am happy to give you my list when I have some time to write it, but I 
am busy with a ballet which goes on stage in mid-November.  The list is 
very long, and very nit-picky to some, but I don't think it is 
unreasonable, and easily solvable if MM actually cared about us 
professionals instead of marketing to music wannabes.  Personally, I 
would be happy to pay $2000 for a music notation program that actually 
worked and was stable, than to pay $5000 over the course of 10 years 
for something that is almost OK, and is always slightly better than 
the competition and doesn't really work very well, and with chronic 
problems that are never corrected.


As far as Update Layout is concerned (it used to be called Recalc 
Music in the early days), that should have been included as part of 
updating the preferences with the new version.  In the early days, 
there was no Automatic Update Layout, and I am so used to doing a 
command-\ every few measures that I didn't think about it at this 
later stage of Finale's existence.  I know that it's a small detail, 
but our business is made or broken in the details.


I welcome your comments, as well as those from anyone else.

Bill Duncan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale