Re: [Fink-devel] fvp changes
Global $config is fine in this situation (UseFinkModules compartmentalizes the handling of some initialization, and it does export some Fink::Services functions into the main namespace). Is --apt ode fixed for this new more-detailed output in standalone mode (when /sw/lib/perl5 (or in whatever @BASEPATH@ is defined) doesn't exist? I have fink in /sw, and the finkaptstatus data looks unchanged by this patch when I move aside my /sw/lib/perl5...still has the old format not the extra fields you are adding. dan On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 19:36:40 -0600, TheSin the...@southofheaven.org wrote: Okay now it works, standalone, --apt and --dpkg all tested, hopefully declaring $config as a global isn't bad ;) - --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! On 2013-06-22, at 7:30 PM, TheSin the...@southofheaven.org wrote: I take it back it only worked with out --apt :\ Fetched 1072 kB in 4s (222 kB/s) Can't locate Fink/Config.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /Library/Perl/5.12/darwin-th I'll keep working on this :\ --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! On 2013-06-22, at 7:27 PM, TheSin the...@southofheaven.org wrote: okay now that I have inet back and hopefully stable, I fixed it so that I get the right arch now. Package: 64bit-cpu Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Architecture: darwin-x86_64 Version: 0-1 Maintainer: Fink Devel fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Description: [virtual package representing the 64bit capability of the CPU] The presence of the 64bit-cpu package indicates that the CPU on which we are running is 64bit capable. . Web site: http://www.finkproject.org/faq/usage-general.php#virtpackage . Maintainer: Fink Devel fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Here is the new patch, hopefully I did it right I couldn't figure out what or why UseFinkModules() was for or did since it returns and exports nothing. If this is wrong please let me know. fvp.patch --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! On 2013-06-21, at 11:56 PM, Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org wrote: On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:11:20 -0600, TheSin the...@southofheaven.org wrote: The new apt is much more strict on the fields in status files, to get it to work I need to make a few minor changes to f-v-p, I spent lots of time working on apt 0.9.82 trying to figure out why girts weren't working and it turns out the parser was considering them invalid due to missing fields like arch and priority. So I made a quick patch which is in my pull request and i'll attach it here as well. I'd add it myself but I'm not sure which branch and if it'll affect anything else that uses f-v-p the current output looks like Package: 64bit-cpu Status: install ok installed Version: 0-1 description: [virtual package representing the 64bit capability of the CPU] I'd like to change it to look like Package: 64bit-cpu Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Architecture: all Version: 0-1 Maintainer: Fink Devel fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Description: [virtual package representing the 64bit capability of the CPU] The presence of the 64bit-cpu package indicates that the CPU on which we are running is 64bit capable. . Web site: http://www.finkproject.org/faq/usage-general.php#virtpackage . Maintainer: Fink Devel fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net This change to --apt output looks reasonable to me. I talked to TheSin in #fink yesterday, who confirmed that old apt would also accept it, so I don't see harm in sending this to master now (rather than later as part of the large apt upgrade work) (would also benefit anyone who's experimenting with new debian tools of any sort). Technical question: Is this really Architecture:all, given that it's generated by a fink that is single-arch? dan -- Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel - -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev - ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive:
Re: [Fink-devel] fvp changes
I don't believe I messed with the standalone version, though it could easily be added, my only focus was the --apt output. Since im not sure what relies on the standalone I couldn't test if it would break anything. --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! On 2013-06-24, at 12:05 AM, Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org wrote: Global $config is fine in this situation (UseFinkModules compartmentalizes the handling of some initialization, and it does export some Fink::Services functions into the main namespace). Is --apt ode fixed for this new more-detailed output in standalone mode (when /sw/lib/perl5 (or in whatever @BASEPATH@ is defined) doesn't exist? I have fink in /sw, and the finkaptstatus data looks unchanged by this patch when I move aside my /sw/lib/perl5...still has the old format not the extra fields you are adding. dan On Sat, 22 Jun 2013 19:36:40 -0600, TheSin the...@southofheaven.org wrote: Okay now it works, standalone, --apt and --dpkg all tested, hopefully declaring $config as a global isn't bad ;) - --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! On 2013-06-22, at 7:30 PM, TheSin the...@southofheaven.org wrote: I take it back it only worked with out --apt :\ Fetched 1072 kB in 4s (222 kB/s) Can't locate Fink/Config.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /Library/Perl/5.12/darwin-th I'll keep working on this :\ --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! On 2013-06-22, at 7:27 PM, TheSin the...@southofheaven.org wrote: okay now that I have inet back and hopefully stable, I fixed it so that I get the right arch now. Package: 64bit-cpu Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Architecture: darwin-x86_64 Version: 0-1 Maintainer: Fink Devel fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Description: [virtual package representing the 64bit capability of the CPU] The presence of the 64bit-cpu package indicates that the CPU on which we are running is 64bit capable. . Web site: http://www.finkproject.org/faq/usage-general.php#virtpackage . Maintainer: Fink Devel fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Here is the new patch, hopefully I did it right I couldn't figure out what or why UseFinkModules() was for or did since it returns and exports nothing. If this is wrong please let me know. fvp.patch --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! On 2013-06-21, at 11:56 PM, Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org wrote: On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:11:20 -0600, TheSin the...@southofheaven.org wrote: The new apt is much more strict on the fields in status files, to get it to work I need to make a few minor changes to f-v-p, I spent lots of time working on apt 0.9.82 trying to figure out why girts weren't working and it turns out the parser was considering them invalid due to missing fields like arch and priority. So I made a quick patch which is in my pull request and i'll attach it here as well. I'd add it myself but I'm not sure which branch and if it'll affect anything else that uses f-v-p the current output looks like Package: 64bit-cpu Status: install ok installed Version: 0-1 description: [virtual package representing the 64bit capability of the CPU] I'd like to change it to look like Package: 64bit-cpu Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Architecture: all Version: 0-1 Maintainer: Fink Devel fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Description: [virtual package representing the 64bit capability of the CPU] The presence of the 64bit-cpu package indicates that the CPU on which we are running is 64bit capable. . Web site: http://www.finkproject.org/faq/usage-general.php#virtpackage . Maintainer: Fink Devel fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net This change to --apt output looks reasonable to me. I talked to TheSin in #fink yesterday, who confirmed that old apt would also accept it, so I don't see harm in sending this to master now (rather than later as part of the large apt upgrade work) (would also benefit anyone who's experimenting with new debian tools of any sort). Technical question: Is this really Architecture:all, given that it's generated by a fink that is single-arch? dan -- Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel -
Re: [Fink-devel] fvp changes
I'd really like to get this committed before the next release if possible, any other objections or can I go a head and commit it to master? --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! On 2013-06-22, at 7:36 PM, TheSin the...@southofheaven.org wrote: Okay now it works, standalone, --apt and --dpkg all tested, hopefully declaring $config as a global isn't bad ;) fvp.patch --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! On 2013-06-22, at 7:30 PM, TheSin the...@southofheaven.org wrote: I take it back it only worked with out --apt :\ Fetched 1072 kB in 4s (222 kB/s) Can't locate Fink/Config.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /Library/Perl/5.12/darwin-th I'll keep working on this :\ --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! On 2013-06-22, at 7:27 PM, TheSin the...@southofheaven.org wrote: okay now that I have inet back and hopefully stable, I fixed it so that I get the right arch now. Package: 64bit-cpu Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Architecture: darwin-x86_64 Version: 0-1 Maintainer: Fink Devel fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Description: [virtual package representing the 64bit capability of the CPU] The presence of the 64bit-cpu package indicates that the CPU on which we are running is 64bit capable. . Web site: http://www.finkproject.org/faq/usage-general.php#virtpackage . Maintainer: Fink Devel fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Here is the new patch, hopefully I did it right I couldn't figure out what or why UseFinkModules() was for or did since it returns and exports nothing. If this is wrong please let me know. fvp.patch --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! On 2013-06-21, at 11:56 PM, Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org wrote: On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:11:20 -0600, TheSin the...@southofheaven.org wrote: The new apt is much more strict on the fields in status files, to get it to work I need to make a few minor changes to f-v-p, I spent lots of time working on apt 0.9.82 trying to figure out why girts weren't working and it turns out the parser was considering them invalid due to missing fields like arch and priority. So I made a quick patch which is in my pull request and i'll attach it here as well. I'd add it myself but I'm not sure which branch and if it'll affect anything else that uses f-v-p the current output looks like Package: 64bit-cpu Status: install ok installed Version: 0-1 description: [virtual package representing the 64bit capability of the CPU] I'd like to change it to look like Package: 64bit-cpu Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Architecture: all Version: 0-1 Maintainer: Fink Devel fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Description: [virtual package representing the 64bit capability of the CPU] The presence of the 64bit-cpu package indicates that the CPU on which we are running is 64bit capable. . Web site: http://www.finkproject.org/faq/usage-general.php#virtpackage . Maintainer: Fink Devel fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net This change to --apt output looks reasonable to me. I talked to TheSin in #fink yesterday, who confirmed that old apt would also accept it, so I don't see harm in sending this to master now (rather than later as part of the large apt upgrade work) (would also benefit anyone who's experimenting with new debian tools of any sort). Technical question: Is this really Architecture:all, given that it's generated by a fink that is single-arch? dan -- Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] fvp changes
the arch was the only thing I was a little on the fence about, I used all cause i knew it'd work and give the least amount of grief but really I think it should be the system's arch, but I wanted to talk to you about that, what is the best fink function to return x86_64? Sorry I haven't been reachable this flood in AB is affecting my internet, I'm tethered at the moment to check email. --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! On 2013-06-21, at 11:56 PM, Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org wrote: On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:11:20 -0600, TheSin the...@southofheaven.org wrote: The new apt is much more strict on the fields in status files, to get it to work I need to make a few minor changes to f-v-p, I spent lots of time working on apt 0.9.82 trying to figure out why girts weren't working and it turns out the parser was considering them invalid due to missing fields like arch and priority. So I made a quick patch which is in my pull request and i'll attach it here as well. I'd add it myself but I'm not sure which branch and if it'll affect anything else that uses f-v-p the current output looks like Package: 64bit-cpu Status: install ok installed Version: 0-1 description: [virtual package representing the 64bit capability of the CPU] I'd like to change it to look like Package: 64bit-cpu Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Architecture: all Version: 0-1 Maintainer: Fink Devel fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Description: [virtual package representing the 64bit capability of the CPU] The presence of the 64bit-cpu package indicates that the CPU on which we are running is 64bit capable. . Web site: http://www.finkproject.org/faq/usage-general.php#virtpackage . Maintainer: Fink Devel fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net This change to --apt output looks reasonable to me. I talked to TheSin in #fink yesterday, who confirmed that old apt would also accept it, so I don't see harm in sending this to master now (rather than later as part of the large apt upgrade work) (would also benefit anyone who's experimenting with new debian tools of any sort). Technical question: Is this really Architecture:all, given that it's generated by a fink that is single-arch? dan -- Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] fvp changes
Okay now it works, standalone, --apt and --dpkg all tested, hopefully declaring $config as a global isn't bad ;) fvp.patch Description: Binary data --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! On 2013-06-22, at 7:30 PM, TheSin the...@southofheaven.org wrote: I take it back it only worked with out --apt :\ Fetched 1072 kB in 4s (222 kB/s) Can't locate Fink/Config.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /Library/Perl/5.12/darwin-th I'll keep working on this :\ --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! On 2013-06-22, at 7:27 PM, TheSin the...@southofheaven.org wrote: okay now that I have inet back and hopefully stable, I fixed it so that I get the right arch now. Package: 64bit-cpu Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Architecture: darwin-x86_64 Version: 0-1 Maintainer: Fink Devel fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Description: [virtual package representing the 64bit capability of the CPU] The presence of the 64bit-cpu package indicates that the CPU on which we are running is 64bit capable. . Web site: http://www.finkproject.org/faq/usage-general.php#virtpackage . Maintainer: Fink Devel fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Here is the new patch, hopefully I did it right I couldn't figure out what or why UseFinkModules() was for or did since it returns and exports nothing. If this is wrong please let me know. fvp.patch --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! On 2013-06-21, at 11:56 PM, Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org wrote: On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:11:20 -0600, TheSin the...@southofheaven.org wrote: The new apt is much more strict on the fields in status files, to get it to work I need to make a few minor changes to f-v-p, I spent lots of time working on apt 0.9.82 trying to figure out why girts weren't working and it turns out the parser was considering them invalid due to missing fields like arch and priority. So I made a quick patch which is in my pull request and i'll attach it here as well. I'd add it myself but I'm not sure which branch and if it'll affect anything else that uses f-v-p the current output looks like Package: 64bit-cpu Status: install ok installed Version: 0-1 description: [virtual package representing the 64bit capability of the CPU] I'd like to change it to look like Package: 64bit-cpu Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Architecture: all Version: 0-1 Maintainer: Fink Devel fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Description: [virtual package representing the 64bit capability of the CPU] The presence of the 64bit-cpu package indicates that the CPU on which we are running is 64bit capable. . Web site: http://www.finkproject.org/faq/usage-general.php#virtpackage . Maintainer: Fink Devel fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net This change to --apt output looks reasonable to me. I talked to TheSin in #fink yesterday, who confirmed that old apt would also accept it, so I don't see harm in sending this to master now (rather than later as part of the large apt upgrade work) (would also benefit anyone who's experimenting with new debian tools of any sort). Technical question: Is this really Architecture:all, given that it's generated by a fink that is single-arch? dan -- Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
Re: [Fink-devel] fvp changes
On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 22:11:20 -0600, TheSin the...@southofheaven.org wrote: The new apt is much more strict on the fields in status files, to get it to work I need to make a few minor changes to f-v-p, I spent lots of time working on apt 0.9.82 trying to figure out why girts weren't working and it turns out the parser was considering them invalid due to missing fields like arch and priority. So I made a quick patch which is in my pull request and i'll attach it here as well. I'd add it myself but I'm not sure which branch and if it'll affect anything else that uses f-v-p the current output looks like Package: 64bit-cpu Status: install ok installed Version: 0-1 description: [virtual package representing the 64bit capability of the CPU] I'd like to change it to look like Package: 64bit-cpu Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Architecture: all Version: 0-1 Maintainer: Fink Devel fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Description: [virtual package representing the 64bit capability of the CPU] The presence of the 64bit-cpu package indicates that the CPU on which we are running is 64bit capable. . Web site: http://www.finkproject.org/faq/usage-general.php#virtpackage . Maintainer: Fink Devel fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net This change to --apt output looks reasonable to me. I talked to TheSin in #fink yesterday, who confirmed that old apt would also accept it, so I don't see harm in sending this to master now (rather than later as part of the large apt upgrade work) (would also benefit anyone who's experimenting with new debian tools of any sort). Technical question: Is this really Architecture:all, given that it's generated by a fink that is single-arch? dan -- Daniel Macks dma...@netspace.org -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev ___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
[Fink-devel] fvp changes
The new apt is much more strict on the fields in status files, to get it to work I need to make a few minor changes to f-v-p, I spent lots of time working on apt 0.9.82 trying to figure out why girts weren't working and it turns out the parser was considering them invalid due to missing fields like arch and priority. So I made a quick patch which is in my pull request and i'll attach it here as well. I'd add it myself but I'm not sure which branch and if it'll affect anything else that uses f-v-p the current output looks like Package: 64bit-cpu Status: install ok installed Version: 0-1 description: [virtual package representing the 64bit capability of the CPU] I'd like to change it to look like Package: 64bit-cpu Status: install ok installed Priority: optional Architecture: all Version: 0-1 Maintainer: Fink Devel fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Description: [virtual package representing the 64bit capability of the CPU] The presence of the 64bit-cpu package indicates that the CPU on which we are running is 64bit capable. . Web site: http://www.finkproject.org/faq/usage-general.php#virtpackage . Maintainer: Fink Devel fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net fvp.patch Description: Binary data --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev___ Fink-devel mailing list Fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List archive: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.os.apple.fink.devel Subscription management: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel
