Re: [Fink-devel] Initial 0.3.2a complete

2002-01-16 Thread Finlay Dobbie


On Wednesday, January 16, 2002, at 05:50  pm, Gordon Messmer wrote:

 ghx still doesn't build.

As I said before, the problems you are encountering have been fixed for 
months now, in ghx-0.1.39-2.

  -- Finlay


___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] Initial 0.3.2a complete

2002-01-16 Thread Max Horn

At 18:21 Uhr + 16.01.2002, Finlay Dobbie wrote:
On Wednesday, January 16, 2002, at 05:50  pm, Gordon Messmer wrote:

ghx still doesn't build.

As I said before, the problems you are encountering have been fixed 
for months now, in ghx-0.1.39-2.

but that is not in stable. You might want to move it there...


Max
-- 
---
Max Horn
Software Developer

email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: (+49) 6151-494890

___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] Initial 0.3.2a complete

2002-01-16 Thread Max Horn

At 9:50 Uhr -0800 16.01.2002, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Thanks Max!  My updated report on the main branch:

gnome-games 1.4.0.3-4: installation fails when chown is not in the path,
   which it normally is not.  gnome-games should refer to the full
   path of the binary

There seem to still be old versions of povray, rasmol, and xfce in the
finkinfo tree.

What do you mean with old ? Not fixed since your last report? Well, 
the maintainers may not yet have gotten around fixing them in stable 
(hint, hint, Jeremy and Andrew =)

ghx still doesn't build.

Hm, too late to remove it from stable now, oversight by me :/


There are two versions of automake, which like the versions of autoconf,
might be required, but they should have different package names so they
are both 'dselect' and apt-get-able.

Actually, that is not a mistake. You only should need to install 
automake 1.4 if you are a developer and specifically need it, then I 
don't think it's too much asked to enter fink install automake-1.4, 
is it?



I'm going to build the crypto branch now.  I'll report again if there's
any problems.

Thanks a lot :)


After that, I'm going to try my hand at a CD based installer.  :)

heheh ok :)



Max
-- 
---
Max Horn
Software Developer

email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: (+49) 6151-494890

___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] Initial 0.3.2a complete

2002-01-16 Thread Max Horn

At 10:14 Uhr +1100 17.01.2002, Jeremy Higgs wrote:
On 17/1/02 5:54 AM, Max Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  At 9:50 Uhr -0800 16.01.2002, Gordon Messmer wrote:
  Thanks Max!  My updated report on the main branch:

  gnome-games 1.4.0.3-4: installation fails when chown is not in the path,
  which it normally is not.  gnome-games should refer to the full
  path of the binary

  There seem to still be old versions of povray, rasmol, and xfce in the
  finkinfo tree.

  What do you mean with old ? Not fixed since your last report? Well,
  the maintainers may not yet have gotten around fixing them in stable
  (hint, hint, Jeremy and Andrew =)

The version of xfce in stable is old... I have compiled the unstable version
of xfce fine, and I have had successful reports, but someone complained of a
bus error, I think.

Bit late to move it to stable now, though, to be included in 0.3.2.a :-/

Considering that 0.3.2a is out for almost 24h, yes, it's a bit later :)


I'll still move it if you want, though! :)

Of course, we'll want it in 0.3.3, don't we?


BTW, I am not sure if everybody is on the fink-announce list - do you 
guys think I should also send the announce mail to fink-user  
fink-beginner?


Max
-- 
---
Max Horn
Software Developer

email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone: (+49) 6151-494890

___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel



Re: [Fink-devel] Initial 0.3.2a complete

2002-01-16 Thread Jeremy Higgs

On 17/1/02 10:29 AM, Max Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 The version of xfce in stable is old... I have compiled the unstable version
 of xfce fine, and I have had successful reports, but someone complained of a
 bus error, I think.
 
 Bit late to move it to stable now, though, to be included in 0.3.2.a :-/
 
 Considering that 0.3.2a is out for almost 24h, yes, it's a bit later :)
 

Just out of interest... What's the best way to move something from unstable
to stable?

Also... (while I'm on the topic of CVS), if you want to 'resurrect' a file
that you've removed (cvs remove), what's the command to do that? I've seen
it done before...

Thanks!


___
Fink-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/fink-devel