[firebird-support] FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-08 Thread raja_s_patil
Hello Friends,

We have been using Firebird since v. 1.5 on Linux as well on windows
for Delphi application running on Win and server on Lin/Win as per
needs in Lan environment. Now Client wants to have centralized
database with two way Replication at HO. The branch database size
varies from 200MB to 1.2GB and estimated combined database will be
about 10GB to 15GB. On centralized database except replication
connections (which will be Batch running as per Branch convenience and
not real time) there will be 10 to 15 users always connected plus a
small web application may have 30 to 40 simultaneous users as a
primary estimate and may be on higher side. As far as Branches are
concerned we are very happy with performance and Stability of database
not a single instance of any data corruptions have been noticed in
last 7 to 8 years inspite of very rough usage by Branch users so
client wants to stick to FB at Branches for sure. But for centralized
database they have doubt that whether it will sustain the volume of 10
to 15 GB and how it will perform and have given indication that they
can Try first FB and if it fails they can go for some other Commercial
Database. As far as we are concerned we would like to stick to FB but
our confidence level is low since we dont have any experience of FB
stability and performance on such large database. To make FB
successful in this scenario please guide w.r.t. Following queries.

1. Whether FB 2.1 SS / FB 2.5 ??  on 64 bit Linux (Kubuntu) will be
able to handle 15GB database ?
2. What version should be selected FB 2.1, 2.5 and which architecture?
3. What precautions should we take like Processor, RAM, Linux FS
selection etc. etc. so that FB  will run with maximum efficiency and
stability.

Thanks and warm regards.

R. S. Patil.



Re: [firebird-support] FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-08 Thread Alexey Kovyazin
08.10.2011 9:37, raja_s_patil:
 But for centralized
 database they have doubt that whether it will sustain the volume of 10
 to 15 GB 

:

One of our customers' databases (not the biggest :) - excerpt from daily 
report from DataGuard, pay attention to database size

==cit=

Regular backup was done successfully

Backup [D:\_backup\bckp_vlm_wtl_20111007_22-00.fbk] 98 Gb was created at 
10:00:00 PM took 01h:45m:51s.534 to complete.

Backup:
[OK] Backup [D:\_backup\bckp_vlm_wtl_20111007_22-00.fbk] 98 Gb done 
successfully at 11:45:51 PM, taking 01h:45m:51s.534.

Restore:
[OK] Restore [D:\_backup\restore.fdb.tmp] 105 Gb done successfully 
at 1:22:48 AM, taking 01h:36m:56s.710.

==cit=

1Terabyte database - http://www.ib-aid.com/articles/item104

And also there is 700Gb beast in production - case study is coming soon :)


Regards,
Alexey Kovyazin
IBSurgeon (www.ib-aid.com)


Re: [firebird-support] FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-08 Thread Dmitry Kuzmenko
Hello, raja_s_patil!

Saturday, October 8, 2011, 9:37:06 AM, you wrote:

r client wants to stick to FB at Branches for sure. But for centralized
r database they have doubt that whether it will sustain the volume of 10
r to 15 GB and how it will perform and have given indication that they

10-15 GB databases now are the most average database size for
Firebird.

r 1. Whether FB 2.1 SS / FB 2.5 ??  on 64 bit Linux (Kubuntu) will be
r able to handle 15GB database ?

it will be able to handle even 1TB database with ~500 concurrent
users.

r 2. What version should be selected FB 2.1, 2.5 and which architecture?

Of course, the newer is better, so, 2.5.1. Architecture - Classic or
SuperClassic, because only these architectures supports SMP.
SuperServer does not support SMP, but can be used for ~20 or more
users, if applications are not mix with OLTP and DSS queries.

r 3. What precautions should we take like Processor, RAM, Linux FS
r selection etc. etc. so that FB  will run with maximum efficiency and
r stability.

efficiency and stability depends on hardware. Pay attention to disks,
use raid 10. At most systems hardware is very different, because of
differen Firebird load, so, it's a bit hard to give exact suggestions.

Since you already have Firebird with 1.5gb databases and ~10-15 users,
I don't think that you need to look at hardware that, for example, 10
times faster than current.
15 users or 40 users - not a big difference, until you use 1-2 core
processor and 1 hard disk (which is usually considered as a desktop
computer).

BTW, 1TB test, that Alexey mentioned, was intentionally made
on desktop computer, not server.

-- 
Dmitry Kuzmenko, www.ib-aid.com



[firebird-support] Re: FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-08 Thread raja_s_patil


--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Dmitry Kuzmenko kdv@... wrote:

 Hello, raja_s_patil!
 
 Saturday, October 8, 2011, 9:37:06 AM, you wrote:
 
 r client wants to stick to FB at Branches for sure. But for centralized
 r database they have doubt that whether it will sustain the volume of 10
 r to 15 GB and how it will perform and have given indication that they
 
 10-15 GB databases now are the most average database size for
 Firebird.
 
 r 1. Whether FB 2.1 SS / FB 2.5 ??  on 64 bit Linux (Kubuntu) will be
 r able to handle 15GB database ?
 
 it will be able to handle even 1TB database with ~500 concurrent
 users.
 
 r 2. What version should be selected FB 2.1, 2.5 and which architecture?
 
 Of course, the newer is better, so, 2.5.1. Architecture - Classic or
 SuperClassic, because only these architectures supports SMP.
 SuperServer does not support SMP, but can be used for ~20 or more
 users, if applications are not mix with OLTP and DSS queries.
 
 r 3. What precautions should we take like Processor, RAM, Linux FS
 r selection etc. etc. so that FB  will run with maximum efficiency and
 r stability.
 
 efficiency and stability depends on hardware. Pay attention to disks,
 use raid 10. At most systems hardware is very different, because of
 differen Firebird load, so, it's a bit hard to give exact suggestions.
 
 Since you already have Firebird with 1.5gb databases and ~10-15 users,
 I don't think that you need to look at hardware that, for example, 10
 times faster than current.
 15 users or 40 users - not a big difference, until you use 1-2 core
 processor and 1 hard disk (which is usually considered as a desktop
 computer).
 
 BTW, 1TB test, that Alexey mentioned, was intentionally made
 on desktop computer, not server.
 
 -- 
 Dmitry Kuzmenko, www.ib-aid.com


Thanks Dmitry for precise point to point reply,

We had a meeting with Client today. I showed FB tech. specs page to client 
which was mentioning 980 GB production database and suggested that we will 
consolidate all the branches Data and run tests on that to see how it performs 
which was readily accepted by Client. Added to this some confidence inspiring 
posts I found here. So slowly our confidence is building.

Regarding FB version I read some performance test data on INTERNET which 
indicates that FB 2.5 is slower compared to 2.1 SS. However you as a active 
member of FB team is suggesting I will try FB 2.5 for test data and experience 
the performance. Few years ago another active member Phill Shrimpton suggested 
me FB and I tested it and till today not only I am with it but extremely 
satisfied with it. I found it Most reliable and frugal on hardware/Maintenance 
requirements. Most of sites where even though  1GB database is there no 
dedicated DBA is available but both performance and stability is extra 
ordinary. Long Live Firebird.

Is there any Memory requirement thumb rule depending upon DB size and No of 
concurrent users ?

Any precautionary measures should I take to have brilliant performance figures 
to Impress the Client ? 

We are going to use a 64 bit Desktop with 8 GB Ram and OS is 64 bit Kubuntu as 
database server. A XP dektop with 4 GB RAM will be used as Client. Tests will 
be few frequently used queries run From IBexpert and Timings will be measured 
on Consolidated Database. These Timings are expected to be reasonable and 
practically acceptable.

Thanks to all who posted and warm regards

Raja



Re: [firebird-support] SQLSTATE 28000

2011-10-08 Thread Thomas Clarke
Raymond,

To connect through isql the command is:

connect ''h:\KKR.FDB' user 'sysdba' password 'masterkey';

You have left out the user name and password.

Thomas.

On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 9:07 AM, raym...@ymail.com raym...@ymail.com wrote:

 **


 Hello,

 This is my first time trying to use Firebird. I am required by a client to
 write an application that extract data from Firebird. Here is what I have
 done so far:
 1. I copied the .FDB file from my client's live application
 2. Installed Firebird
 3. Tried to access the database using ISQL: connect 'h:\KKR.FDB';

 And it returned:
 Statement failed, SQLSTATE = 28000
 Your user name and password are not defined. Ask your database
 administrator to set up a Firebird login.

 What am I missing?

 Any help would be great.
 Thanks.
 Raymond

  




-- 
Thomas Clarke
Cyber Sea Incorporated
#6 Kingston Terrace
Flint Hall
St. Michael
Barbados BB11070

voice: (246) 234-9692
email: tcla...@cybersea.biz
web: http://cybersea.biz


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





++

Visit http://www.firebirdsql.org and click the Resources item
on the main (top) menu.  Try Knowledgebase and FAQ links !

Also search the knowledgebases at http://www.ibphoenix.com 

++
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/firebird-support/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/firebird-support/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
firebird-support-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
firebird-support-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
firebird-support-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



[firebird-support] creating a database in ubuntu

2011-10-08 Thread sir_wally_lewis
OK,

I use ubuntu lucid ( 10.04 )
I have got all the way to 

installing and running firebird 2.1 super
installing and running flamerobin

every time i try to create a database i get this:

Engine Code: 335544344
Engine Message :
I/O error for file /opt/data/firebird/blank/blank.fdb
Error while trying to create file
Permission denied

i have no idea.

Kind Regards,

Robert.





Re: [firebird-support] creating a database in ubuntu

2011-10-08 Thread Helen Borrie
At 05:27 PM 9/10/2011, you wrote:
OK,

I use ubuntu lucid ( 10.04 )
I have got all the way to 

installing and running firebird 2.1 super
installing and running flamerobin

every time i try to create a database i get this:

Engine Code: 335544344
Engine Message :
I/O error for file /opt/data/firebird/blank/blank.fdb
Error while trying to create file
Permission denied

i have no idea.

The permission you are being denied is the write permission to 
/opt/data/firebird/blank/.  With su privileges, make yourself a member of the 
firebird group and make sure to give rwx permissions to the firebird group in 
/opt/data/ and any subdirs beneath it where you will want to create or restore 
databases.

./heLen