Re: [Flashcoders] What does this PATENT mean??

2006-02-24 Thread Ron Wheeler
The US Patent Office is a mess and I suspect that most software patents 
like this one are not valid since their are lots of examples of prior 
art. This patent would be challenged by every big company if the owners 
ever tried to enforce it. They would have a hard time proving that they 
were the first to build a RIA.


There is a bigger problem in the making.
The proposed US law to move the patent process to a first-to-file 
basis will be the end of open source development and be a big impediment 
to any custom software work.


This is a serious issue and the American business community had better 
get their act together and put a stop to that proposed law.


What the new law appears to do is to say that it does not matter who 
invents something, it only matters who files for the patent first.
This will mean that anyone can monitor open source projects looking for 
new ideas and then file patents on them.
They only have to extract the core of the idea, describe it and go. They 
do not have to disclose how they discovered it and only have to worry 
that someone else is applying for the same stolen idea at the same time.
The original author then has to notice that the patent application has 
been filed and protest to the Patent Office within some delay (60 days 
or some relatively short period). This means that every open source 
project will have to employ a full-time patent lawyer to protect the 
work. Every little detail will have to be patented to protect your right 
to use the code that you write and you will have to monitor each day's 
patent filings and prepare a legal objection to each patent that is 
filed on ideas already in common use.


This is obviously being backed by the big companies(IBM, Microsoft,SCO) 
and patent squatting operations that can afford to set up a poaching 
operation to find new ideas from open source projects and patent them 
before the authors realize that the idea is worth patenting.


The impact on American business will be huge over the long term., if you 
think of all of the software that is based on open source and the 
chilling effect that this will have on custom software development.
You will not be able to write a program for a client or within an IT 
department without patenting everything that you suspect might be 
innovative for fear of waking up in 2 years to find out that someone is 
knocking on your door saying that they patented the process long after 
you wrote the program and that you or your employer or your customer are 
in violation of their patent even if you wrote the code long before they 
applied for a patent.
You can not be sure when you write the code even if you check for 
existing patents.
Each programmer will have to provided with a patent lawyer to do the 
searches and prepare the documentation to file patents and to negotiate 
license agreements for ideas already patented. The cost for business 
will be huge.


This law is slowly being pushed through the US Congress - drug companies 
seem to be behind this as well.


If you are an American or have American clients, urge them to write 
their elected representatives to warn against this law.
If you are outside the US, write to your elected representatives to urge 
them to protest to the US government and start the process to cease to 
recognize US Patents based on this proposed law.


If we wait for the law to be passed, there will be years of chaos and 
endless litigation before the law can be repealed.


This document promotes first-to file.
http://www4.nationalacademies.org/news.nsf/isbn/0309089107?OpenDocument

This is a blog that discusses the progress of the bill through Congress.
http://promotetheprogress.com/archives/2006/01/more_smoke_sign.html

Ron

stefano wrote:


I found it while browsing, read it and remained stuck...

Take a look, please

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1Sect2=HITOFFd=PALLp=1
u=/netahtml/srchnum.htmr=1f=Gl=50s1=7,000,180.WKU.OS=PN/7,000,180RS=P
N/7,000,180

...It sounds strange to me (I am from Italy)...but...If this
applies...wow...Will we have to pay for royalties ??

I know the above is not CODING MATTERS but...

Bye

Stef


___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


 


___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


[Flashcoders] What does this PATENT mean??

2006-02-24 Thread Mauro Di Blasi


http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/it/m/intro/index.html
http://www.attivazione.org/wp/?p=70
http://www.ffii.org/
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com


RE: [Flashcoders] What does this PATENT mean??

2006-02-24 Thread Merrill, Jason
This is another silly attempt at making money - filing a patent after
the technology existed and was in wide use - Adobe and Sun and others
will respond.   

The patent covers all rich media technology implementations including
Flash, Flex, Java, AJAX and XAML and all device footprints which access
rich-media Internet applications including desktops, mobile devices,
set-top boxes and video game consolesIt's possible that Balthaser
may struggle to enforce its patent, because of prior art - the process
where a patent is invalid if it can be proven that the innovation in
question already existed before the patent was filed.

http://news.zdnet.co.uk/business/0,39020645,39253949,00.htm 

Also, see: http://www.ip-wars.net/


Jason Merrill   |   E-Learning Solutions   |  icfconsulting.com






NOTICE:
This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged or 
confidential information. If you have received it in error, please notify the 
sender immediately and delete the original. Any other use of this e-mail by you 
is prohibited.
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders

Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com