So painfully true :)
On Apr 14, 2006, at 5:33 PM, JesterXL wrote:
No one cares, Jim, if their Flash works. Just because we're coder
geeks
doesn't mean we're JavaScript coder geeks, hah!
- Original Message -
From: Jim Kremens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Flashcoders mailing list flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Q: Flash Object vs UFO for flash
detection and
aseolas workaround
Did you ever look at the code?
Jim Kremens
On 4/14/06, bryan.rice [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 14, 2006, at 12:44 PM, elibol wrote:
I don't much like FlashObject
What don't you like about it? I have deployed many sites with it
(using express install) and have never had an issue. I quite like
it, (I used to use Colin's Moock FPI), so I am curious as to why you
don't.
blue skies,
bryan
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
--
Jim Kremens
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
___
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
To change your subscription options or search the archive:
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software
Premier Authorized Adobe Consulting and Training
http://www.figleaf.com
http://training.figleaf.com
